House seal

Promoting Access to Credit for Everyday Americans

Thursday, April 16, 2026

Key Takeaways

  • Rep. Barr (R, KY-6) championed legislation to reform the Fair Credit Reporting Act by capping civil liability and requiring perjury attestations for CFPB consumer complaints.
  • Dan Smith (President and CEO, Consumer Data Industry Association) argued uncapped liability deters furnishers, while Chi Chi Wu (Director, National Consumer Law Center) warned reforms eliminate accountability.
  • Rep. Foster (D, IL-11) questioned Wu on the CFPB's current management, leading Wu to allege the agency is posting false information to discourage consumers from filing complaints.
  • Republicans argued that removing negative data reduces credit accuracy, while Democrats contended that the Trump administration has illegally dismantled the CFPB’s ability to protect consumers from errors.
  • This hearing sets the stage for legislative battles over the FCRA Liability Harmonization Act and the future of the CFPB’s role in overseeing the credit reporting industry.
Hearing Details

Witnesses

Members Who Spoke

Top 5 Organizations Mentioned

View on Congress.gov

Read the full transcript

Starting at $350/mo

  • Full hearing transcripts
  • Speaker timestamps with video verification
  • Organization & competitor mentions
  • Same-day delivery
  • Personalized summaries
Start reading

30-day money-back guarantee on all paid plans.

Hearing Analysis

Overview

This hearing examined the functionality and integrity of the U.S. credit reporting system, focusing on the balance between consumer protection and the "completeness" of data required for lenders to assess risk. Lawmakers and witnesses debated the effectiveness of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) in the modern economy, specifically addressing the rise of alternative data, the impact of medical debt on credit scores, and the surge of disputes within the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) complaint database. The session highlighted a sharp partisan divide over the current administration's management of the CFPB and whether legislative reforms should focus on reducing industry liability or enhancing consumer rights.

Key Testimony & Policy

The testimony centered on several pieces of legislation aimed at reforming the FCRA and the credit reporting ecosystem. Dan Smith, President and CEO of the Consumer Data Industry Association (CDIA), and Rebecca Kuehn, a partner at Hudson Cook, advocated for H.R. 5775, the FCRA Liability Harmonization Act. They argued that the current uncapped statutory and punitive damages in class-action lawsuits incentivize "frivolous" litigation rather than correcting data errors. Smith emphasized that the voluntary nature of the credit reporting system is threatened when the legal risks for "furnishers"—the banks and creditors providing data—become too high, potentially leading to a less complete credit picture.

Celia Winslow, President and CEO of the American Financial Services Association (AFSA), highlighted the threat of "credit washing," where scammers use automated tools to flood the system with false disputes to temporarily remove accurate negative information. She expressed support for the Ending Scam Credit Repair Act (H.R. 306) to curb predatory credit repair organizations. Veneshia Ferdinand, representing the American Bankers Association (ABA), testified that banks rely on complete data to meet "ability to repay" requirements under the Truth in Lending Act. She argued that suppressing accurate information, such as medical debt, forces lenders to tighten credit standards or raise prices to account for hidden risks.

In contrast, Chi Chi Wu, Director of Consumer Reporting and Data Advocacy at the National Consumer Law Center (NCLC), strongly opposed the Republican-led bills. She argued that H.R. 5775 would "shred" consumer protections by capping damages and attorney fees, making it impossible for harmed individuals to find legal representation. Wu advocated for the Comprehensive Credit Act, a Democratic proposal that would ban medical debt from credit reports, shorten the time negative information remains on a file, and provide a public option for credit reporting. She contended that medical debt is not predictive of creditworthiness and is often the result of a dysfunctional healthcare system rather than financial irresponsibility.

The hearing also addressed H.R. 5402, the Credit Access and Inclusion Act, which would allow for the reporting of "alternative data" such as rent, utility, and telecom payments. While proponents argued this would help "credit invisible" Americans build a history, Wu and Rep. Nydia Velázquez (D, NY-7) warned that reporting negative utility or rent data could lead to homelessness or utility shutoffs for struggling families.

Notable Exchanges & Partisan Dynamics

A significant portion of the hearing was dedicated to the leadership of the CFPB under Acting Director Russell Vought. Rep. Bill Foster (D, IL-11) and Rep. Maxine Waters (D, CA-43) criticized the Trump administration for "gutting" the bureau's budget and enforcement staff. They cited reports that consumer relief rates for credit reporting complaints dropped from 20% to 0.1% under Vought’s tenure. Rep. Waters characterized the administration's actions as "lawless" and demanded Vought appear before the committee to testify under oath.

Chairman Andy Barr (R, KY-6) defended his legislation, H.R. 7588, the Eliminating Fraud in the CFPB’s Consumer Complaint Database Act. He argued the database is being "weaponized" by social media scammers and AI-driven bots to inundate the system with fraudulent claims. Barr and Smith engaged in a dialogue about the need for consumers to attest to the accuracy of their complaints under penalty of perjury to "reduce the noise" and allow legitimate disputes to be resolved faster.

The debate over medical debt also saw a sharp exchange. Chairman Barr argued that "imagining debt away" through non-disclosure is a "fiction" that undermines market safety. Rep. Joyce Beatty (D, OH-3) and Ms. Wu countered that medical debt is fundamentally different from voluntary consumer debt, noting that even the National Bureau of Economic Research has found it lacks predictive value for future defaults.

Organizations Mentioned

- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB): The central regulator discussed regarding its consumer complaint database and recent budget/staffing cuts under the Trump administration. - National Consumer Law Center (NCLC): Represented by Chi Chi Wu, the organization led the opposition to industry-backed reforms, advocating instead for the Comprehensive Credit Act. - Consumer Data Industry Association (CDIA): Represented by Dan Smith, this trade group advocated for liability harmonization and the protection of the voluntary data-furnishing system. - American Financial Services Association (AFSA): Represented by Celia Winslow, the group focused on the rise of "credit washing" and the need to regulate predatory credit repair companies. - American Bankers Association (ABA): Represented by Veneshia Ferdinand, the ABA emphasized the importance of data completeness for bank underwriting and regulatory compliance. - New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA): Mentioned by Rep. Velázquez as an example of a public entity that lacks the resources to implement unfunded mandates for rent reporting. - FICO and VantageScore: Discussed in the context of credit score competition and the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s (FHFA) move to allow alternative scoring models in the mortgage market. - Federal Trade Commission (FTC): Cited as a primary agency for handling identity theft reports and investigating fraudulent credit repair schemes.

What's Next

The subcommittee is expected to move toward a markup of the discussed bills, including H.R. 7588 (CFPB database reform), H.R. 5775 (liability harmonization), and H.R. 5402 (alternative data). Democrats signaled they will continue to push for the Comprehensive Credit Act and the Ending Scam Credit Repair Act (H.R. 306). Additionally, Ranking Member Waters and other Democrats indicated they will continue to demand that CFPB Acting Director Russell Vought testify before the full committee regarding the agency's reduced enforcement activities and budget restructuring.

Transcript

Rep. Barr (KY-6)

The Subcommittee on Financial Institutions will come to order. Without objection, the chair is authorized to declare a recess of the committee at any time. Today's hearing is titled Promoting Access to Credit for Everyday Americans. Without objection, all members will have five legislative days within which to submit extraneous materials to the chair for inclusion in the record. I now recognize myself for four minutes for an opening statement. I want to thank our witnesses for appearing before us today, and I look forward to a constructive discussion on access to credit and the future of our credit reporting system. Access to credit is fundamental to economic mobility. It is the foundation that provides families the opportunity to buy homes. It gives Main Street small businesses leverage to grow, and it provides individuals the flexibility to manage through both opportunity and hardship. At the center of that system is the Fair Credit Reporting Act, a law that for decades has aimed to balance two core objectives: consumer protection and enabling the responsible flow of reliable information that lenders rely on to provide credit. For decades, that balance has helped create one of the most robust and accessible credit markets in the world. But today, that balance is being tested. We're seeing increasing pressure to weaken the completeness of credit reporting, whether by removing entire categories of debt or by promoting reporting systems that only consider positive information. Let's be clear: a credit reporting system that ignores real obligations is not more fair. It's simply less accurate. And when accuracy suffers, access to credit suffers with it. Lenders rely on a full picture of risk. If that picture is incomplete, they don't simply absorb more risk without consequence. They pull back, raise prices, or both. That ultimately hurts the very consumers these proposals claim to help. It also threatens the safety and soundness of our financial institutions, who no longer understand the risks on their balance sheet. At the same time, the system is facing growing strain from another direction: the rise in questionable and duplicative complaints in the CFPB's consumer complaint database. Consumer protections are essential, and dispute mechanisms are a cornerstone of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, ensuring the accuracy that is the center of our robust consumer reporting system. But when furnishers and consumer reporting agencies are flooded with frivolous or even fraudulent submissions, it undermines their credibility, slows down the resolution of legitimate claims, and increases costs across the system. If we want these tools to work for consumers, they must be rooted in accountability and good faith. Strengthening the integrity of the CFPB's consumer complaint database, as my Eliminating Fraud in the CFPB's Consumer Complaint Database Act would do, is not about limiting consumer rights; it's about preserving them. We also should be focused on expanding opportunities in ways that are consistent with safety and soundness. Millions of Americans are credit invisible, not because they lack fiscal responsibility, but because the system doesn't fully capture it. Responsible use of additional alternative data, like rent, telecom, and utility payments, positive information about performing on credit, can help bring more people into the financial system without distorting risk. I look forward to hearing from our witnesses and working with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to get this right, to make sure that we are advocating for completeness and accuracy in credit reporting so that lenders have the confidence to deploy credit into the economy and help Americans achieve their God-given potential, help them achieve the American dream of upward mobility. Thank you. And I now recognize the ranking member of the subcommittee, Dr. Foster, for four minutes for an opening statement.

Read the full transcript

Starting at $350/mo

  • Full hearing transcripts
  • Speaker timestamps with video verification
  • Organization & competitor mentions
  • Same-day delivery
  • Personalized summaries
Start reading

30-day money-back guarantee on all paid plans.

Not ready to subscribe?

Get a free daily digest with hearing summaries ranked by relevance.

Already have an account? Log in