Key Takeaways
- •The Digital GI Bill program's cost has doubled to over $2 billion, with VA ending MITRE's contract for cost estimates, potentially bringing this function in-house.
- •Mr. Smith (VA) claimed the Digital GI Bill delivered "tremendous results," automating 65% of claims and decommissioning eight legacy systems, despite cost expansions due to new legislative mandates.
- •Rep. Pappas (D-NH-1) pressed Mr. Smith (VA) on the VA's failure to communicate Chapter 35 payment delays to veterans in fall 2025, which Smith attributed to the Anti-Deficiency Act.
- •While both parties agreed on the need for accountability, Democrats criticized the hearing's narrow focus and lack of key witnesses, contrasting with Republican emphasis on VA's systemic IT failures.
- •Rep. Van Orden (R-WI-3) suggested Congress might legislate a contingency fund to ensure veterans receive payments during future VA IT system failures, citing the VA's poor track record.
Read the full transcript
Starting at $350/mo
- Full hearing transcripts
- Speaker timestamps with video verification
- Organization & competitor mentions
- Same-day delivery
- Personalized summaries
30-day money-back guarantee on all paid plans.
Hearing Analysis
Overview
The House Veterans' Affairs Subcommittee on Technology Modernization and the Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity held a joint hearing on February 4, 2026, to investigate the ongoing challenges facing the Digital G.I. Bill (DGIB) program. The hearing focused on significant cost overruns, which have seen the project’s life-cycle estimate balloon from hundreds of millions to over $2.6 billion, and systemic payment delays that left thousands of student veterans and survivors in financial distress during the Fall 2025 semester. Chairmen Tom Barrett (R-MI-7) and Derrick Van Orden (R-WI-3) led the inquiry, emphasizing a lack of accountability within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and a history of failed IT modernization efforts.
The hearing opened with sharp criticism of the VA’s management of the DGIB contract, originally intended to modernize education benefit delivery by replacing 50-year-old legacy systems like the Benefits Delivery Network (BDN). Chairman Barrett noted that while the system was meant to reduce bureaucracy, it has instead become a barrier, forcing veterans to navigate backlogs and housing instability. Ranking Member Nikki Budzinski (D-IL-13) and Ranking Member Chris Pappas (D-NH-1) echoed these concerns, though they specifically highlighted a failure in leadership and communication during the Fall 2025 payment crisis, rather than a purely technical or contractor-driven failure.
Policy Proposals
Mr. Kenneth Smith, Executive Director of Education Service at the Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA), defended the program’s progress, noting that 65% of all education claims are now automated and processed within an average of 5.6 days. He attributed the rising costs to "cost expansion" rather than "overruns," citing unplanned requirements from legislative mandates such as the Johnny Isakson and David P. Roe Act and the Elizabeth Dole Act, as well as court decisions like Rudisill v. McDonough. Mr. Smith was joined by Mr. Robert Orifici of the VA’s Office of Information and Technology (OIT), who confirmed the successful decommissioning of the BDN legacy system in August 2025.
Overview
A significant portion of the hearing addressed the Fall 2025 delays in Chapter 35 (Survivors' and Dependents' Educational Assistance) benefits. Rep. Pappas challenged Mr. Smith on why the VA failed to communicate with beneficiaries for over 70 days while payments were stalled. Mr. Smith claimed the VA was prohibited from communicating during the government shutdown due to the Anti-Deficiency Act, a justification Rep. Pappas rejected, noting that the Secretary of Veterans Affairs continued to use social media during that period and that education benefits were funded programs. The delays were reportedly caused by a manual data reconciliation process that VA planners estimated would take five minutes per file but actually required up to three hours, creating a massive backlog during the peak enrollment season.
Key Testimony
On the second panel, industry and policy experts provided a broader view of the acquisition failures. Mr. Justin Parke, Managing Director at Accenture Federal Services, testified that Accenture had met its contractual obligations, delivering eight major releases and achieving high automation rates. He argued that the $1.08 billion Accenture contract ceiling was appropriate given the expanded scope. Mr. Troy Mueller, Managing Director at MITRE, presented the most recent Life Cycle Cost Estimate (LCCE), placing the 10-year program cost at $2.6 billion in then-year dollars. Mr. Mueller recommended that the VA establish an independent, enterprise-level cost-estimating office to provide more accurate baselines for future large-scale IT projects.
Mr. William Hubbard, Vice President for Veterans and Military Policy at Veterans Education Success (VES), provided testimony on the human impact of these technical failures. He shared accounts of student veterans facing car repossessions and evictions due to missing housing stipends. Mr. Hubbard urged Congress to mandate that the VA treat education benefit delivery as an "essential function" during shutdowns and called for a prohibition on major system updates during peak academic windows (August/September and January).
Overview
Partisan dynamics were largely unified in frustration with the VA’s performance, though Republicans focused more on "bureaucratic paralysis" and the need for private-sector-style accountability, while Democrats emphasized staffing shortages and the dissolution of internal oversight offices like the Strategic Acquisition Management Initiatives (SAMI). Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-IL-3) specifically questioned why the VA eliminated SAMI before its mission to improve cost-estimating capacity was complete.
The hearing concluded with Chairman Van Orden demanding a clear organizational chart and a "line and block" accountability structure for the DGIB program. He criticized the VA for having a "zero percent success rate" in large-scale IT infrastructure and suggested that Congress might need to legislate contingency funds to ensure veterans are paid via paper checks or alternative means when IT systems fail. No specific follow-up deadlines were set, but the subcommittees indicated that oversight would continue until the VA demonstrates a consistent ability to deliver benefits without disruption.
Transcript
Check, check, one, two, three. Mike check. Check, check, one, two, three. Check, check, one, two, three. We're good.
Read the full transcript
Starting at $350/mo
- Full hearing transcripts
- Speaker timestamps with video verification
- Organization & competitor mentions
- Same-day delivery
- Personalized summaries
30-day money-back guarantee on all paid plans.
Not ready to subscribe?
Get a free daily digest with hearing summaries ranked by relevance.
Already have an account? Log in
