Key Takeaways
- •The Trump administration is utilizing bilateral "ART" deals to bypass WTO gridlock, securing commitments from nations like Indonesia and Malaysia to support a permanent e-commerce moratorium.
- •Kelly Ann Shaw (Partner, Akin) argued the U.S. should accept a limited "status quo" for the WTO, focusing on technical standards rather than failed multilateral negotiations.
- •Rep. Jason Smith (R, MO-8) pressed witnesses on whether bilateral negotiations achieved market access that the WTO could not, with Shaw confirming bilateral leverage is currently more effective.
- •Republicans advocated for using Section 301 investigations to counter foreign subsidies, while Rep. Suzan DelBene (D, WA-1) criticized the administration's "reckless" tariffs for increasing costs for families.
- •The 14th Ministerial Conference in Cameroon will determine the fate of the global e-commerce moratorium and test the viability of the U.S. "bilateral-first" trade strategy.
Read the full transcript
Starting at $350/mo
- Full hearing transcripts
- Speaker timestamps with video verification
- Organization & competitor mentions
- Same-day delivery
- Personalized summaries
30-day money-back guarantee on all paid plans.
Hearing Analysis
Overview
The House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Trade convened this hearing to discuss United States priorities and strategy for the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) upcoming 14th Ministerial Conference (MC14) in Yaoundé, Cameroon. Chairman Adrian Smith (R, NE-3) opened the session by emphasizing the need for the WTO to deliver practical outcomes for American farmers and businesses, while expressing support for the Trump administration’s efforts to rebalance global trade through bilateral negotiations and "Access and Reform Trade" (ART) deals. Ranking Member Linda Sánchez (D, CA-38) countered by defending the WTO as a cornerstone of the rules-based international system, criticizing the administration’s use of tariffs as an abuse of the rule of law and warning that withdrawing from the WTO would create a power vacuum for the People's Republic of China (China) to fill.
Key Testimony
The witness testimony focused on the structural failures of the WTO and the specific policy goals for MC14. Ms. Kelly Ann Shaw, Partner at Akin, proposed that the U.S. should accept a "status quo" strategy, treating the WTO as a forum for technical transparency and baseline rules rather than a venue for major new negotiations. She argued that the organization is currently too large and diverse for consensus-based breakthroughs. Mr. Stephen Ezell, Vice President of Global Innovation Policy at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF), emphasized the critical importance of the digital economy, noting that U.S. digital services exports reached $1.15 trillion in 2024. He urged the U.S. to secure a permanent moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions and to rejoin the Joint Statement Initiative (JSI) on e-commerce to counter the "Brussels effect" of European Union (EU) regulations.
Overview
Agricultural interests were represented by Mr. Peter Bachmann, President and CEO of the USA Rice Federation (USA Rice), who detailed how the Republic of India (India) has distorted global rice markets through massive subsidies and public stockholding programs. Bachmann cited a 2025 United States International Trade Commission (USITC) Section 332 study showing that rice imports have displaced $1.5 billion in domestic sales. He called for the U.S. to hold the line against Indian demands for permanent exceptions to market price support rules. Mr. Bruce Hirsh, Founder of Tailwind Global Strategies LLC, highlighted the value of the WTO’s "behind-the-scenes" committee work in resolving trade irritants before they escalate into formal disputes, though he acknowledged the dispute settlement system remains broken due to the vacancy in the Appellate Body.
The hearing featured significant discussion on the Trump administration’s recent trade actions. Several members, including Rep. Suzan DelBene (D, WA-1), questioned the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) regarding its initiation of 76 simultaneous Section 301 investigations into industrial excess capacity and forced labor. Rep. DelBene expressed concern that the five-month timeline for these investigations was unprecedented and aimed at resurrecting tariffs previously struck down by the Supreme Court of the United States. Conversely, Republican members like Rep. Carol Miller (R, WV-1) and Rep. Michelle Fischbach (R, MN-7) praised the administration’s use of bilateral leverage to secure market access in countries like Malaysia, Cambodia, and Indonesia.
Industry Impact
The People's Republic of China (China) and the Republic of India (India) were central to the discussion of WTO reform. Witnesses and members criticized China for continuing to claim "developing country" status despite its economic size, and for failing to notify the WTO of its industrial subsidies. India was frequently characterized as a "hostage-taker" for its habit of blocking the e-commerce moratorium to gain leverage on agricultural issues. Rep. Gregory Murphy (R, NC-3) and Rep. Jodey Arrington (R, TX-19) argued that the WTO has failed to act as a credible referee against China’s state-directed economic model, necessitating unilateral U.S. action.
Partisan Dynamics
Partisan dynamics were sharply divided between the GOP’s preference for bilateral "ART" deals and the Democrats’ preference for multilateral engagement. Rep. Jimmy Panetta (D, CA-19) and Rep. Terri Sewell (D, AL-7) warned that the U.S. is losing influence as the EU strikes major regional agreements with Mercosur and India. Meanwhile, Rep. Blake Moore (R, UT-1) suggested using the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) as a template for high-standard digital trade rules in future plurilateral agreements.
Overview
Notable exchanges occurred regarding the Republic of Uzbekistan (Uzbekistan), with Rep. Miller advocating for the lifting of the Jackson-Vanik amendment and granting Permanent Normalized Trade Relations (PNTR) as the country nears WTO accession. Ms. Shaw supported this as a way to diversify supply chains away from China. Regarding next steps, the committee looked toward the MC14 conference in Cameroon as a deadline for the e-commerce moratorium, with witnesses suggesting that if a permanent deal is not reached, the U.S. should rely on bilateral commitments and Section 301 enforcement to protect its digital exports.
Transcript
Thank you to Ranking Member Sánchez, subcommittee members, and our witnesses for being here today. I appreciate you sharing your time. We meet at an important time for international trade. Next week, the world's economies will meet in Cameroon for the World Trade Organization's 14th Ministerial Conference, which will frequently be referred to today as MC14. Today's hearing reflects Congress's support for strong U.S. leadership to advance our interests at the WTO. I also believe there is significant support in Congress for the Trump administration's top priorities for proposed outcomes at MC14 and look forward to discussing these priorities today. The Trump administration has taken on a significant challenge in seeking to rebalance global trade through increased market access for U.S. exports, removing unfair tariff and non-tariff barriers imposed by our trading partners, and encouraging new investment and production in the U.S. For years, the U.S. has pushed for our trading partners at the WTO to work with us to resolve these issues but has continuously faced significant headwinds. But I believe the tide is shifting under the leadership of this administration. We stand at a critical juncture with respect to the relevance of the WTO in U.S. trade policy. We should not concede core American priorities nor accept complacency. At the same time, I believe the WTO can still have a critical role to play in our global trade relationships. I hope this hearing provides an opportunity for members of this committee to have a constructive discussion on how the WTO can meet the needs of a new generation of global trade policy, delivering positive outcomes for American farmers, workers, and businesses. Certainly, not all of the United States' concerns with the WTO can be resolved in Cameroon and we should be realistic about potential outcomes. During this Trade Subcommittee's hearing two years ago, ahead of the last ministerial conference in Abu Dhabi, I stressed the importance of showing strong U.S. leadership at the WTO, something the Biden administration seemed intent on ceding. As I think most of my colleagues here would acknowledge, given the WTO's requirement for consensus-based decisions, real negotiated outcomes are time and time again undermined by a handful of spoiler countries. This undermines progress at the WTO and most importantly does not allow us to address longstanding priorities such as a stronger agriculture agreement or developing standards for emerging industries. Significant reform therefore is required at the WTO for the sake of its long-term durability and relevance in the global trading system. Even so, I believe that the WTO can still provide value to the U.S. and American industries, including at the upcoming ministerial conference. I am grateful for the Trump administration's clear position on issues like the moratorium on the imposition of customs duties on electronic transmissions, and I'm hopeful we can finally agree to a permanent moratorium in Cameroon. This would benefit American businesses of all sizes and in many sectors, and it also would prevent trading partners from leveraging this issue toward other ends in the future. The work should not end in Cameroon. Moving forward, members should focus their efforts on putting forward concrete proposals for reform at the WTO rather than endless scoping exercises that lead to vague and ambiguous negotiating objectives unlikely to result in real outcomes. I remain optimistic that strong U.S. leadership at the WTO, with support and oversight from the U.S. Congress, can deliver. I urge all our trading partners to engage constructively with U.S. delegation to achieve practical and mutually beneficial outcomes at MC14. With that, I yield to Ranking Member Ms. Sánchez for an opening statement.
Read the full transcript
Starting at $350/mo
- Full hearing transcripts
- Speaker timestamps with video verification
- Organization & competitor mentions
- Same-day delivery
- Personalized summaries
30-day money-back guarantee on all paid plans.
Not ready to subscribe?
Get a free daily digest with hearing summaries ranked by relevance.
Already have an account? Log in
