Building an AI-Ready America: Higher Education in the Age of AI

The Subcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce Development will come to order. I know the quorum is present. Without objections, the chair is is recognized to call recess any time. Good morning and welcome. I want to thank our witnesses for joining us today as we examine one of the most consequential developments in higher education the rise of artificial intelligence, AI. In just a few years, AI has grown dramatically across every segment of campus life. Students are using it to study, write, and problem solve. Faculties are are using it to redesign courses and to rethink instruction. And administrators are using it to reduce paperwork burdens. This is not a passing trend. It's a seismic shift in how learning happens and how institutions operate. This shift begins extraordinary opp- uh brings extraordinary opportunities. AI can personalize instruction in ways that a single instructor teaching many students simply cannot do. It can identify students who are struggling before they fall behind. It can reduce the administrative burdens that consume faculty, and staff, freeing them to focus on students. AI also helps better align academic programs with knowledge and skills employers need. The students in the classroom today will need to understand not only how to use AI, but also how to evaluate its critically uh critically It recognizes limitations and exercises the kind of judgment that that automation cannot replace. At the same time, the challenges of AI are significant, if students can produce polished work without genuine learning, the value of credentials is diminished for employers, institutions, and students. Academic integrity framework built around built for built for the previous era are under significant strain, and institutions still working out how to respond. Concerns about bias, data privacy, cyber security remain unsolved. And many educators are rightly ask asking what widespread use of AI could mean to foundational skills like writing, critical thinking, and problem solving. The right's response is neither a knee-jerk prohibition nor a careless adoption. It is a thoughtful leadership grounded in a commitment to student access. Some st- some institutions are already demonstrating what it looks like, uh with AI literacy initiatives. faculty development programs, and partnerships with employers designed to to work around evolving workforce needs. Our global competitors are investing heavily in AI and integrating it into their educational systems. Employers are building their operations around it. Higher education has both opportunity and obligation to help lead this transition, rather than simply endure it. Today's hearing gives us an opportunity to examine how education can rise to the challenge uphold the core mission of higher education and ensure students are prepared to succeed in AI driven world. I look forward to the testimony and I yield to anything you can remember.

Thank you, Mister Chairman, and thank you to our witnesses for being here today. Artificial intelligence i- is no longer theoretical. Students are using it, faculty are using it, universities are adopting it, employers are expecting familiarity with it. The question before us is no longer whether AI will shape higher education, it already is. The real question is whether we will shape it responsibly. Right now, students across the country are trying to decide whether pursuing higher education is still worth it in a rapidly changing economy, largely driven by AI. New graduates entering the workforce here every day, that automation may replace the jobs for which they are trained. Faculty and educational professionals are being asked to adopt tools overnight, even as they evolve faster than institutions can respond. Fear and uncertainty are growing because there are few clear rules, few protections, and limited coordinated federal leadership. AI can absolutely be a tool that that helps Americans progress. It can support learning, expand access to tutoring and research, assistance and can help institutions better serve students. But these tools must remain tools. They cannot replace instruction, replace educators, or or undermine the student learning. We need clear guardrails to ensure AI strengthens education rather than weakens it. Unfortunately, the current administration's policy is moving us in the wrong direction. At a moment when stronger oversight is needed, we are seeing hesitation, fragmentation, and the weakening of the very institutions responsible for protecting students and educational professions, professionals. Uh, as private companies rapidly collect data and expand AI systems into classrooms and and campuses, students and institutions are increasingly at risk. And what makes this moment especially concerning is that the Trump administration is weakening the very institutions responsible for protecting students while simultaneously pushing to rapidly expand the use of AI. This administration says it wants to unleash a AI, yet it has supported efforts to dismantle and weaken the Department of Education, reduce capacity within the Office of Civil Rights, eliminate the office responsible for educational technology guidance and support, and has scaled back workforce preparation, including the Office of Career Technical and Adult Education. That is deeply counter-productive. These gaps matter because AI systems are are not neutral. They can reinforce bias, misuse student data, and create discriminatory outcomes that directly impact access to education, financial aid, disability accommodations, and an academic opportunity. And without strong federal oversight, students, faculty, and educational workers are left vulnerable with little recourse when their rights are violated by these systems. And that is why it is our job to step in. We need strong guardrails and infrastructure that match the scale of this technological s- shift. And that means restoring and strengthening federal educational technology leadership. It means uh rebuilding uh OCR's capacity uh so that complaints involving AI discrimination and data misuse can actually be investigated. It means establishing clear accountability standards around transparency, data protection, auditing, and oversight for AI systems used in higher education. But most importantly, higher education institutions need coordinated federal guidance instead of being left to navigate this alone campus by campus. AI is already here. Ignoring it will will not stop it. But but failing to govern it responsibly will deeply uh deepen inequality and weaken trust in education and leave students unprotected during one of the most significant technological transitions of our time. We have an obligation to ensure that AI is used ethically and responsibly to serve students, educators, and the public interest. And with that, Mr. Chairman, I yield back.

Thank you. Pursuant to Committee Rule eight C, all members who wish to insert written statements into record may do so by submitting them to the committee clerk electronically in Microsoft Word format by five p m fourteen days after this hearing without objection the hearing record will remain open for fourteen days to allow such comments and other materials noted during the hearing to be submitted for the official hearing record. I would now like to turn to introduction of our four distinguished witnesses. Um, our first witness is Jonathan, uh, Fosard, Chief Information Officer of Florida State University in Tallahassee, Florida. Uh, our second witness is, is Doctor Dave Duke, uh, Chief Product Officer for Higher Education at McGraw Hill in Chicago, Illinois. The third witness is Doctor Bridget Burns, uh CEO at University Innovation Alli- uh Alliance in Temple uh, Tempur, uh uh, Tempur, Arizona, sorry. And our fourth witness is Michael Horn, an author and adjunct professor at Harvard Graduate School in Education in Cambridge, Mass- Massachusetts. We thank the witness for being here today and look forward to your testimony. Pursuant to committee rules, I will ask each of you to limit your oral presentation to three minute summation in your written statement. Uh, the clock will count down for three minutes as committee members have m- many questions for you. However, uh, pursuant to community rule eight D in comi- committee practice, we will not cut off your testimony until you reach the five minute mark. I would also like to remind the witnesses to - to be aware of your responsibility f- to provide accurate information to the subcommittee. Uh, I first would like to first recognize Mister Buzard for your testimony.

Thank you, Chairman. Chairman Owens, Ranking Member Adams, and members of the subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to testify today on an important topic of AI ready America. My name is Jonathan Fosard and I am the Chief Information Officer at Florida State University. I am honored to appear before you and grateful for the opportunity to share the higher education perspective on one of the most consequential issues facing our country. Artificial intelligence is not simply another emerging technology. It is quickly becoming a defining capability that will shape the economic competitiveness, national security, scientific discovery, education, health care, public service, and the future of our work. The United States right now is a global leader in artificial intelligence, and we must remain at the forefront. This is a pivotal moment. Institutions, organizations, companies, and nations have a choice. They can embrace AI responsibly, or they can choose not to use it at all. That decision will increasingly differentiate who is leading and who is falling behind at an exponential rate. That is why education must be central to America's AI strategy. America's AI leadership will not be secured by technology companies alone. It will require national education and research pipeline that begins in K through twelve and continues through higher education, expands into the workforce training and lifelong learning, and is strengthened by meaningful partnerships among university government and our industries. At Florida State University, we see this responsibility very clearly. Higher education must prepare students not only to use AI, but to understand it, to question it, to improve it, secure it, and apply it in ways that serve people and strengthen our nation. I have many ways uh of change and have seen many ways of change as a technology practitioner for more than twenty-six years. As a father of two children who will soon enter the workforce, this topic is also very personal to me. I want my children and students across this country to inherit a nation that continues to lead, continues to innovate, protect its values, and create opportunities for generations to come. I believe that five priorities should guide our nation's approach as we move forward. First, I believe that we must treat AI literacy as a national workforce priority. Second, we must support secure and responsible access to AI tools so that students are prepared for the future. Third, we must invest in hands-on learning and workforce development programs. Fourth, we must strengthen the K through twelve to higher education pipeline. And fifth, we must continue investing in research infrastructure. At Florida State University, we stand ready to do our part. We are preparing students, we're supporting faculty, we're enabling researchers, we're modernizing our infrastructure, we're protecting data, and we're building partnerships that expand access to AI tools and training across all disciplines. We are doing this because AI readiness is not optional. It is central to our students' future, our workforce, our research enterprise, our natural competitiveness, and our responsibility to the country. The United States has the talent, the institution, the the innovation ecosystems, and the values needed to lead in a world of artificial intelligence. But leadership is not guaranteed. It must be built, protected, renewed, sustained, and invested in education, research, infrastructure, security, and most importantly people. This is the moment for urgency but also for optimism. Higher education stands ready to help build the next generation of AI leadership and innovation. Working together, we can ensure that the United States remains at the forefront, not only for our own future, but for the future of our allies, our partners, and the democratic values we all share. Thank you for your time, for your service to our country, and for your commitment to building this AI-ready America. I look forward to your questions later.

Thank you. Now I'd like to recognize Doctor Duke for your testimony.

Thank you. I wanna talk about something more uncomfortable than AI adoption rates, a gap that is opening in American higher education right now that our institutions are not yet equipped to close. Two things are happening simultaneously. Employers across every major sector of the American economy now expect AI proficiency from college graduates. It's showing up in entry-level job descriptions. And hiring managers, many of which are not yet adept at using AI themselves, are expecting graduates to work with AI tools productively and responsibly within a specific professional domain. And this is also true. Most institutions of higher education are not preparing their graduates to meet that expectation. The response to AI on campus across the country has been fragmented and inconsistent. The gap between what higher education is producing and what the economy now requires is real. and it is growing and it is a structural challenge. And I call this the proficiency dilemma, and it has two sides that are in tension. On one side, students are using AI constantly. They've developed a practical fluency through daily use, but fluency through unsupervised use is not the same as cultivated professional competency. They've not developed the critical thinking or domain expertise that AI will demand of them as professionals, and they have learned to produce outputs without developing the capacity to evaluate them. On the other side, academic institutions that have responded to AI primarily through restriction and detection are producing a different kind of graduate altogether, one who has been taught that AI is something to be managed and avoided, rather than understood and used with skill and judgment. And so the right answer is neither unrestricted use nor aggressive restriction. It is intentional, structured, pedagogically sophisticated integration, teaching students not only how to use these tools, but when, why, and with what critical judgment. Very few institutions are doing this well, and I want you to know that. Faculty are making individual decisions in a policy vacuum, often without guidance, without professional development, and without the time to think through what responsible AI integration requires. And let me explain what is at stake if we get this wrong. We will produce a generation of graduates who are simultaneously over-reliant on AI and under-prepared to work with it professionally. We will widen, not narrow, the gap between students who receive structured AI education and those who do not. And we will perpetuate a disadvantaged workforce that has a difficult time competing in the global economy. Higher education has always been America's mechanism. for translating individual potential into national strength. And if we allow it to fall behind the economy it is meant to serve, we are not just failing students, we're failing ourselves. And I'll leave you with three recommendations. First, treat AI proficiency as a core educational competency, a nationwide commitment built into accreditation standards and general education frameworks to clarify the expectation of an AI ready America. Second, initiate the development of institutional AI frameworks that create actionable guidance that faculty and administrators need but currently lack, so the individual educators are not left to navigate this transformation on their own. And third, examine the variation in AI readiness among all institutions explicitly well-organized and better positioned universities have advantages in AI adoptions that smaller regional and community colleges do not. and the benefits of ai in higher education should be broadly shared. So the question before American higher education is not whether ai will transform the experience of learning and working, it already has. The question is whether our institutions will lead that transformation. The students sitting in classrooms today will spend the most consequential years of their careers in an ai-shaped economy. They deserve an education that prepares them for that reality. McGraw-Hill is committed to that work and we're grateful for the subcommittee's attention to it. Thank you and I welcome your questions.

Thank you. And I'd like to recognize Doctor Burns for your testimony.

Chairman Owens, uh, Ranking Member Adams and members of the subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to testify today. My name is Bridget Burns and I serve as the CEO of the University Innovation Alliance, which is a national consortium of nineteen large public research universities across the country, serving more than half a million students. Over a decade ago, the UIA was formed by our presidents and chancellors who were trying to respond to a national challenge. We needed to increase the number of college graduates to strengthen the economic competitiveness of our country. And over the past twelve years, our member institutions have stepped up and produced more than a hundred and eighty thousand additional graduates above their stretch capacity in that time, while simultaneously increasing their graduates from low income backgrounds by fifty one percent. We did this by doing something higher education rarely does, which is we innovated together and we shared openly what we learned in real time. Our campuses have leveraged AI, machine learning, chatbots, and predictive analytics to improve student outcomes for more than a decade. That experience has d- directly shapes how we view artificial intelligence. It's tempting to treat AI as a technology challenge, But it is far more all encompassing than that. It is rapidly reshaping teaching and learning, workforce preparation, research, advising operations, and student support. In less than two years, institutions have gone from asking whether a student would use these tools to manage a reality where their use is every day. One of the reasons uh navigating AI transformation is so challenging is that it does not neatly fit into any traditional organizational structure. It cuts across every aspect of the institution. Institutions across the country are trying to answer the exact same questions responsibly around workforce preparation and privacy and governance and learning. But most institutions are not actually resisting AI. They are trying to navigate it, but most of them are navigating it alone. That is the problem. My concern is that we are approaching AI a primarily as an institutional challenge when it's increasingly becoming a national competitiveness challenge. If America wants to lead in an AI-enabled future, we need to be organizing around national priorities and leveraging the full capacity of our higher education institutions to help achieve them. That requires coordinating infrastructure that does not exist. Right now, thousands of institutions are independently evaluating vendors and developing governance frameworks piloting tools and creating policies. And too often, the lessons learned are remaining in one place and not going to another institution. We're duplicating effort at a moment when we should be accelerating learning across the country. We also need to not leave under-resourced institutions behind. Whether a student benefits from responsible AI adoption should not depend on where that student happens to enroll. Students attending rural institutions, regional universities, community colleges, HBCUs, all of them deserve access to the same opportunities at the wealthiest institutions in the country. America's economic competitiveness depends on developing talent everywhere. Our campuses are already demonstrating what responsible AI adoption looks like. At Arizona State for U- uh University, for example, they developed something called the triangulator, which streamlines credit transfer credit evaluation, a process that any other institution that traditionally requires staff manually weeks to compare catalog courses by d- you know, course by course. The tool uses AI to identify likely equivalencies, and present recommendations for staff review, with a human expert always making final decisions. AI open-sourced this solution, and already many institutions, including seven of my own, are working to scale it. Purdue University was the first institution in the country to m- integrate AI literacy into their graduation requirements. At UC Riverside, the writing faculty have designed a Socratic tutoring tool that coaches students through the work via questioning rather than rewriting. It preserves authentic learning while provi- per- providing the personalized learning and support they need. And at University of Utah, they're piloting AI-enabled tools that help students connect academic pathways to career opportunities. Importantly, these institutions are not treating AI innovation as a proprietary competitive advantage. They are openly sharing what they learn so other institutions can adapt and benefit from the work. What concerns me is that we are doing so while campuses are operating under significant strain. Leadership turnover, staffing shortages, financial pressure, and uncertainty around research infrastructure are making it harder for institutions to build the capacity required to navigate this moment successfully. Federal policy has spent decades rewarding institutions for developing innovation. The AI era requires us to also re- reward institutions for sharing them. One of the most effective ways to do that would be to prioritize multi-institutional partnerships and federally funded AI initiatives. I'm looking forward to it. Thank you so much for your questions, and I look forward to your time.

Thank you. Last, lastly, I'd like to write now as Mr. Horn for your testimony.

Chairman Owens, Ranking Member Adams, and members of the subcommittee, thank you for inviting me today. My central message today is simple. AI alone will not improve higher education. What matters is whether colleges redesign their resources, processes, and priorities around it. The analogy is electricity. Early factories adopted electric motors but saw little productivity gain. because they kept the same organizational designs and processes in place. Only later, when they redesigned themselves around electricity, did produ- productivity surge. Higher education is at a similar moment. Today, faculty and students are already using AI at scale. Adoption has, in a sense, been quite rapid. Yet most colleges, with a few uh exceptions named earlier, have seen few learning leaps, few dramatic improvements in student success, and few efficiency gains. Most campuses remain somewhere between a wait-and-see approach and a patchwork of siloed experiments. The outcome is frankly predictable. In every sector, when organizations treat the adoption of technology as a problem of technology, progress is slow and uneven. Indeed, organizations that frame the challenge as one of often perceive it more as a threat than an opportunity. Hence how AI is exacerbating cognitive automation on the part of students, and faculty overwhelmingly report concerns around plagiarism and cheating. The challenge is actually the operating model itself, and the opportunity is redesign. We can in fact use AI to increase academic river, rigor, and reinvent assessment. If AI can complete an assignment, perhaps the assignment itself is in need of change. Oral defenses, presentations, demonstrations, and rigorous feedback can help ensure that students are still doing the hard work of learning. We can use AI to boost student success by connecting data around academics, finances, and well-being to offer more meaningful support. We can also streamline processes and reduce administrative overhead. and we can better connect learning to work. As AI rapidly ch- changes jobs and the half-life of skills shrinks, students need opportunities to do real work in real-world settings, and use AI in the course of that work. Employers are not asking whether employees should use AI. They are expecting it. That means that schools must offer embedded projects and simulations and courses. externships, paid internships, co-ops, or apprenticeships. All the better when these experiences both pay, count for credit, and connect students to working professionals to help them build social capital. Many universities are stepping up on this front, from Northeastern University with its co-ops to Minerva University, where I'm a trustee, with its combination of online seminars and in-person, in-country projects, to reach university with its apprenticeship degrees. Finally, because it is difficult to redesign existing institutions, we should encourage experimentation from both existing schools, as well as new AI native colleges and university. That will require accreditation reform that lowers barriers to entry, while strengthening the focus on student outcomes. Something counts as innovative only if it creates true progress

Thank you. Under Committee Rule nine, who will now question witnesses under five minute rule, I will recognize myself for five minutes. Mister Puzard. Uh Florida State has partnered with companies like uh Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Web Services to expand access to AI tools and training. How do partnerships like these bridge the gap between classroom learning and skills employers employees employees are seeking? And how can universities and uh cons uh s- how can universities structure themselves to give students work first relevance uh uh to experience while preserving institutional independence and academic priorities?

Thank you, Chairman. I I think that this is a um this is a a a great question because it's a partnership. Uh, higher education, we don't view that AI will replace instruction or replace the classroom, but the partnership will prepare um will prepare our students uh to be able to uh have exposure to the tools and the the the workforce and the platform that they will use in their future careers so for us these partnerships with companies like Google, Microsoft, with with Amazon, is to give them access, that ubiquitous access across all disciplines, across all fields, to have exposure to these tools in a secure and reliable way. And our framework that we've developed is um is called RISE, and it's built on uh research and instruction for R, innovation modernization for I, security and compliance for S, and engagement and student success. And we really feel like our AI strategy has to be built on those four pillars, to be successful with any partnership that we do, but we do feel like that there's a classroom component that we have to have um foundational access foundational knowledge but we also have to expose our students to the tools that they're going to use in the workforce. And so Florida State University has taken the approach of of building these partnerships and having secure environments where their data's protected they can experiment with our instructors with our researchers, in a secure environment.

Very good, thank you.

Thank you sir.

Uh, Doctor Duke, uh, you spent many years working in educational technology. The rapid rise of artificial intelligence since twenty twenty-two has transformed the conversations around uh teaching and learning technology. From your perspective, how has educational technology landscape changed during that during that time? And what are the biggest uh implica- implementations of that shift for students faculty and institutions?

Thank you for the question. It it's true, the landscape has changed significantly, uh, as we sit here today, AI is has been embedded uh in every daily workload for students, instructors and administrators. The vast majority of students are using artificial intelligence. Faculty adoption uh is uneven, but it is accelerating. Everyone from admissions counselors, financial aid representatives, other administrators all using generative ai in the work that they do virtually every education infrastructure company like mcgraw-hill has included ai enabled products into their ecosystems and so ai as we sit here today is now a requirement to provide the best learning possible it is increased personalized learning it is increasing efficacy and if we don't invest more and and um put more resources behind this, we won't see the full value of artificial intelligence.

Great, thank you. Uh, Mister Horne, the rise of artificial intelligence has led some students and families to question the value of co- college education. What must colleges and universities do to demonstrate their value in the AI driven economy?

It's true that many uh people are increasingly questioning the value of college. I think what it's incumbent upon colleges to do is really show the

Thank you so much. Uh,

Thank you.

I now recognize um the ranking member for purpose of questioning witnesses.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Uh, uh, Doctor Burns, um, as you may be aware, HBCU's play a major role in expanding educational opportunities, especially in STEM-related fields. A joint report from UNCF, Houston Tillotson University, and Ekluglen Ekluglen highlighted that AI could transform the role of our education at HBCU's by creating new opportunities for innovation. However, sim- simultaneously many HBCUs continue to face challenges with funding and resource constraints, that can limit their efforts to access AI technologies to the extent that these schools decide to use them. And that matters because AI readiness can cannot only be available uh to the institutions with the largest endowments, the strongest vendor relationships, or the most staff capacity. If if we're not careful, AI could become uh one more area where well-resourced institutions move forward, while under-resourced institutions are asked to do more with less. Mister Chairman, I'd like to um uh to uh for unanimous consent to enter this article, uh HBCU's Artificial Intelligence and a New Vision for Higher Education Interface. Thank you. Doctor Burns, uh what are some of the opportunities and challenges that HBCUs are encountering with AI innovation?

Thank you, uh, Ranking Member Adams. I would say first, uh, the UIA includes the largest HBCU in the country, North Carolina A and T, and so we have some familiarity with the challenges and they are quite relatable. We're seeing this across the sector where it's a, I would just say broadly, the lack of broader coordination across higher education to ensure that all institutions are benefiting in real time when institutions are actually figuring out some of these similar challenges around illiteracy and Um that is disadvantaging, HPC is is disadvantaging under-resourced institutions broadly. Um I observe that the indirect cost uh challenge around uh their research enterprise is definitely made it very difficult for institutions to navigate we're asking them at a moment when we need American ingenuity which I our academic research is really the heart of, um is is operating in a time where it's been relatively uh de-stabilized, I would say, financially. Um but these HBCUs broadly are an incredible uh STEM talent activator. They are uh they generate incredible talent and we just believe that broadly for the competitiveness of our country that we need to activate all the talent that we have.

Thank you. And and thank you for mentioning North Carolina A and T. That is my alma mater twice. Uh, Dr. Byrne's uh colleges and universities now have access to to many different AI tools. Some come with packages of other technologies such as Microsoft three three six five. while others require specific subscriptions. Given that larger institutions have more resources for new tools, under-resourced institutions may have a harder time providing these tools and developing faculty understanding, therefore creating disparities in our students' academic careers. And I wonder that if if uh if in if students at one institution are receiving strong AI literacy hands-on experience and access to tools employees are already using, while students at another institution or not, then we're not preparing students equally for the future of work. So given that large uh larger institutions are at the forefront of developing AI curricula and competency, what impact do you think that this will have on student access and the digital achievement gap?

I'm I am deeply concerned about students who are being left behind across the country. Uh we noticed early on You know, it's it's not like we have a ton of expertise with navigating AI, right? Everyone is as new as a couple years at this technology. And so, one of my institutions were first trying to diagnose how they decide to sign any of these agreements. A ASU, for instance, was the first institution to sign a enterprise level contract with open AI. Um, we started in that moment sharing what are the questions you ask, how do you interrogate it? Because this expertise doesn't exist. Normally, it wouldn't be just like the legal counsel knows how to navigate something so complex. And it's worth definitely seeing at HBCU's and there are some resources out there, but I think there need to be more in terms of information.

Thank you. A few more seconds. What what can under-resourced institutions do to provide additional access to these tools despite limited capacity?

Uh, ranking member Adams, I believe that institutions need to be broadly sharing what they're learning in real time. They're lack we currently lack the coordinating infrastructure where one campus is tinkering and others are gonna ask the same question. and it's actually going to harm students. I'm most concerned about institutions that um are i- in a moment where they don't have that capacity, they will freeze. That in a risk is is too, we're too uncertain and we can't delegate um the responsibilities to our student, to a vendor. So as a result, there are some institutions who will resist, who will just freeze because they are waiting for more clear direction.

Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman, uh you're back, I'm out of time.

Thank you. I would now like to recognize the Chairman of full committee. I'm a good friend from Michigan, Mr. Warburg.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thanks to the panel. And I wish uh there had been a miracle today and all of the committees that are meeting would have not met except this one. Uh, because frankly, it would have been great, and, Mr. Chairman, thanks for your wisdom in holding this this hearing. It is so important, but I think that if we all had been here on either side of the aisle, there'd be a great amount of discomfort on our faces. at what we are hearing because of the challenges that we are forced to face. But um, Miss Burns, thank you for giving us some examples of hope and opportunity. Also, the opportunity for me to say, this is a time of disruption. And higher education needs to find ways of doing things without always more money, but being creative and setting priorities. So, I appreciate the examples and um, again, I wish we all had had a chance to hear because These are great times, uh, but the challenge is there and we don't wanna miss it. Uh, um, and uh, um, Mister Horn, I was taken by your example of electricity and uh, taken that wonderful thing and and just doing the same old, same old, until finally we woke up, and I think that'll be the case with AI. Uh, but the Chinese Communist Party isn't waiting for us. And uh, we had better be the ones that are using it well. So, Could you go on a little bit further, uh, Mr. Horn and, or Doctor Horn, and um, tell us what it would mean for a college to redesign itself around EI, on AI rather than simply adding AI as a tool.

Absolutely. On our, on our research on innovation, what's become clear is that institutions need freedom, uh, to free up the how they do their work, to be able to actually rethink the resources, processes, the financial formula in some cases to your point about doing things with less, uh, and really reinvent themselves. And that requires unconstrained, uh, in terms of the inputs and what we're looking for in the institution, but an absolute rigor on what the outcomes are on the other side. And I believe what we would see, and we are seeing in many pockets already, is a plurality of different designs, uh, where we know, for example, Western Governors University is already creating a native AI university experiment, we know that UMass Global is doing the same thing right now. And so we're seeing existing institutions literally carve out separate areas where they can rethink the fundamental first principles of what these universities look like and frankly we've done this before with on-line education as well. Many institutions just used on-line education to layer over their existing models, but some institutions, again like Western Governors, started thinking from principles and they have a very different model as you know with taking the faculty role and unbundling it into five different roles uh to create a much more robust web of support but also a very affordable model for students, that has a very high success rate.

Good, and again an example of where the consortiums and joining together and sharing this is so important. Um uh Mr. Fassard um how should universities respond when students are making decisions based on uncertainty about AIs effect on future employment.

I I think that's a question that all universities should be asking. We're having these conversations with our leadership, our our uh provost, our faculty are having these. I th I think that it is every discipline, no matter what discipline it is, will need some type of AI literacy and AI skill set. Um there will be degrees and and programs that we will have to think through, uh the curriculum, and we're going to have to evaluate what those programs look like, but I strongly believe that that every discipline, every field, every degree that we have will need some component of artificial intelligence, baseline literacy, and use.

Just plan on it.

I - I - I wholeheartedly agree,

Yeah.

um, that that is the future for America.

Doctor Duke, what kinds of evidence do you look for before concluding that an AI tool is truly improving learning? And how do you ensure those tools are helping students build lasting understanding rather than completing assignments?

Yeah, thank you for the question. This is something we do pretty well, efficacy research. uh and we approach this uh with regards to gen ai in a similar way, um in terms of backwards designs, we do pre and post test measures, basic statistical analysis, said differently, we have an idea in mind what learning outcome we want to create and we work backwards, did we create a learning experience that produced that. The new layer though with generative ai is who did the work. Uh so when gen gen ai is involved we have to make sure we have preserved the productive struggle of students. so that we can assess whether or not they did the work, and therefore we had the outcome we wanted.

Well thanks again for scaring me, but all also exciting me, and uh my grandkids are gonna have an interesting life ahead because of things that we can use and learn from screwing up with electricity originally. Move on. I yield back.

Thank you. I'd like now to recognize my friend from California, Mr. Takano.

Thank you, Mister Chairman. Uh, Doctor Burns, uh thank you for mentioning uh the university in my district, the University of California, Riverside, uh in your testimony. As you point out, instructors at uh UCR are using AI to prompt students to learn how to be better writers, rather than to do their work for them, without using AI to kind of, you know, coast or or or to make it look like they they wrote um uh a product um uh but they're actually using AI to teach the students to actually be better writers um the innovations like this one are one of the many reasons why UCR is the top university in the country for social mob mobility what I mean by that is that uh students of lower economic means come to this university and they they gain the capacity to actually uh increase their economic situation,

Right.

and there are measures out there on social mobility and UCR is one of the universities where the students who go there make incredible gains. Um uh now innovations like the one we just mentioned are one of the so uh I Doctor Burns what I wanna know is do you foresee more examples like the one you gave in which AI technology could lessen the gaps in student achievement?

Um uh Uh, Congressman Takahano, yes, in cra- in fact, I had a difficult time winnowing my testimony greatly because there were so many examples across our institutions. There is so much creativity and innovation that has been unleashed by this technology. I was just on UCR's campus two weeks ago, and you would be blown away at the incredible way that we are unleashing the creativity of faculty to reimagine how they can support students. And really for us, when you think about closing gaps and thinking about how you can help all students, the you know the the holy grail we're looking for here is personalized learning. And this is going to enable us to possibly achieve personalized learning at scale

Okay.

with the small pilots and experiments the faculty are doing in real time. And um and we are measuring not just by the degree outcomes, but rather we're moving to that post-college mobility as being the measure of our success, um something that UCR has been a leader on.

So as a former teacher um at the secondary level, um and having been a substitute teacher at the at the primary level, the individualized learning is what I see as the greatest potential of AI, not replacing the int- the teacher. Um, you'll need teachers to for that human interaction, um, and that human connection. Um, but a teacher with thirty kids or a hundred and eighty kids, uh, at the higher level, but it doesn't change much from like twelfth grade to like freshman year, uh, when students have gotta pass uh usually the expository writing requirement and uh the university math, university level math. Um and one of the things that I, as a former community college trustee, that I encountered a lot, what was an ongoing theme is is the cost of remediation. Um when students either, you know, they enter straight into the four year university or that it's a struggle for the community colleges to get students um to not to to retain them. Uh What uh what are you what are what's what sorts of things are going on in sort of addressing this remediation? Cuz I think I kind of think of that as one of the gaps. Would you agree with me?

Uh, yes, I I think this is one of the things where you really need um as much uh of the capacity and technology is a is a ma is a really supportive tool when when used well, um to insure that we can understand what a student knows, what they don't know. Otherwise it's very difficult if you're teaching in a course to actually know where every student is coming in from. So this is definitely one of the ways we're thinking about it. We uh just wrapped up a complex project to try and address uh DF and withdrawal rates on campus um especially in gateway courses and we applied an intervention that made a huge difference uh adding supplemental instruction and near-peer coaching uh so that students actually had that support and some campuses are experimenting with using AI as a coach, as actually using that Socratic method to be able to probe students. it's actually helping with learning and that's where we need more studies is to understand how we're gonna actually be able to measure the learning improvement. But we already saw that it increased uh normally when a student retakes a course, if they've uh take if they've gotten a D or an F in the past, they've only passed at about fifty percent uh that second time. Ours were up to eighty percent, they were passing the course. So we're seeing incredible gains, there are lots of experiments happening. Um I would say that our institutions are are what really matters is not just the number of experiments, But how do you make sure that the ideas are spreading? The scale of learning and how we accelerate ideas across the sector so that every institution can benefit from the experiments and the innovation that are underway.

Well, thank you. I wish we could spend more time together, but um I gotta be respectful, I yield back.

Thank you. I would like to uh recognize my friend from North Carolina, Mr. Harris.

Thank you, Mister Chairman, and uh thank you to all of you on the panel today for your expertise. And and Mister Chairman, I appreciate you uh calling this uh this hearing. You know, over the last several years, we've seen a dramatic increase, obviously, in the use of AI programs, and this increase has been apparent in academic settings from K-twelve institutions, to secondary schools, to colleges and universities. And while many students have used AI to complete coursework, there has been a need across the workforce for students to have more of an in-depth knowledge of how to use AI technology in professional settings as you all have, have touched on today. closing that knowledge gap between students using AI for course work and the young professionals entering the workforce where proficiency with AI programs is necessary, for creating work products is absolutely critical. And Doctor Duke, I I just noticed in reading your written testimony, you explained the ability to work with AI tools productively, critically, and responsibly within a specific skill domain is an expectation that is shown in job descriptions for in- entry-level jobs across the country, I would ask how can we help prepare students to transfer their AI knowledge from basic AI proficiency learned in school to the skills that our workforce are actually looking for.

Thank you for the question. I think one of the um missteps we can make is to synonymize enabling a workforce with artificial intelligence and applying ai to the learning journey they're not the same thing in the workforce you want people to be very very efficient work efficiently make very few mistakes when

right

people are learning you actually want that to be inefficient sometimes you want them to make mistakes that's where the best learning happens and there is the dilemma along the way these students have to establish proficiency while

hmm

also managing learning and so one way we can do that is to integrate it into the curriculum we could define the set of skills that students need and make sure that they get them along the way they get some of this uh proficiency through daily use but it's not the same as cultivated professional competency and this is where i think the learning science actually needs to catch up and how we need to change concept mastery and how a student marches toward not knowing anything and graduating and being in the workforce.

and and you also discussed the importance of treating ai proficiency as a quote " core educational competency", just like information literacy, quantitative reasoning, or financial literacy. What would you, in your opinion, treating AI proficiency as a core educational competency look like in the higher education setting?

One, we would have to say that. We would have to determine that it is a core competency or something that is, um, expected. Right now, I don't think that we do that. We do that in other areas like financial literacy and information literacy. as you point out. But until we do that, institutions aren't going to be able to design their curricula around that. And also, um, making it a core competency, I think, will accelerate some of the thinking, the experiments, and the testing that we've talked about on the panel today, um,

Mm-hmm.

and will help us improve in this area.

Thank you. On January twenty-third, twenty twenty-five, President Trump issued an executive order titled Removing Barriers to American Leadership. and artificial intelligence. And although that EO does not specifically address higher education, the goal of the order was to revoke restrictive policies and promote innovation. And, Mister Bizarre, I just want to ask in your experience working at Florida State University, what impact does removing restrictive policies and promoting innovation have on the way AI is developed and utilized on college and university campuses like your own?

I I think that artificial intelligence has to have the ability um to be integrated into curriculum be uh accessible to our students um a a case in an example is, we partnered on a design sprint, it was a twenty-four hour design sprint with students across multiple disciplines to solve a real world problem. AI didn't do the job for them, they had to come together, they had to collaborate, they had to use AI in these in these uh new and innovative ways to solve a problem, so there was a problem, You get a team together, they have twenty-four hours to work around the clock to solve it. It's something that they're gonna do in the real world setting too, in their careers. And I think that we have to allow the space for innovation um to take place.

Mm-hmm.

The other thing that I would say is we have been heavily investing in uh the material science space, the engineering space, the quantum technology space at Florida State University. And that's under the leadership of our president because that will differentiate us too to have that infrastructure and we must be able to research that and to invest in that. um to be able to really be a leader in the world in artificial intelligence.

Well, thank you very much and, Mr. Chairman, I yield back.

Thank you. I'd like to uh to recognize a friend from Oregon, uh Miss. Bon- Bonavici.

Uh thank you, Mr. Chairman, thank you to the witnesses, uh Doctor Burns thank you for all the work you've done in higher education in Oregon and now of course with the alliance. Um AI we know is shaping classrooms and workplaces uh faster than many schools and employers can respond. I'm also on the early childhood K twelve uh subcommittee and we're having similar conversations there. Uh but I tell you many educators at all levels are concerned about a decline in their students' creativity and critical thinking skills. Doctor Rebecca Winthrop from the Brookings institution calls this cognitive stunting. And if it's happening at the K twelve level, it's definitely gonna be affecting higher education. It's the impairment of cognitive development that results from an over-reliance on AI tools in the learning process. I'd like to submit for the record a recent article by Doctor Winthrop that's in the New York Times titled " What three hundred and seventy thousand college essays tell us about AI's effects on creativity?" Uh Doctor Winthrop discusses the importance of the brainstorming process for building creative thinking skills and generating new and innovative ideas and offloading the act of brainstorming is one of the many ways that despite its numerous promises, AI can do more harm than good for students in the long run. So I'd like to submit that Article for the record, Mr. Chairman.

Objection.

Uh and and UC Berkeley School of Law has a new policy, the restricting the use of AI in academic work, submitted for credit. They want students to use their cognitive skills. The policy prohibits AI in conceptualization, revision, translation, and exams. A recent article about the California state system just out uh discussed a survey that a majority of students and faculty are skeptical of the benefits and worry about what AI will do to not only job security and creativity, but also the environment. Um, and there's a lot of questions about AI grading. Um, I'm a parent who paid college tuition for two students for many years. Uh, when students are paying tuition, do they not deserve human feedback? And so there's questions about AI grading as well, uh, privacy, security, bias. Um, so I just wanna to p- to put that out there as the AI continues to integrate in higher education, I think it's more important that institutions put appropriate safeguards in place to protect students from the risks, including from the misuse and harmful effects and protect against bias, protect privacy and security, and also, uh, the uh the decline of critical thinking skills. So, Doctor Burns, what safeguards should be in place to protect students from the risks associated with AI including cognitive stunting?

Uh, thank you, Congressman, uh, Kwanamichi. I uh, I share your concerns. These are things that our institutions are wrestling with right now in real time, every institution in the country is. And again, I'm most concerned about under-resourced institutions navigating this, because these are things that are absolutely on the frontier of science. We're trying to figure out the learning effects, um, the the mental uh uh effects, the cognitive load. Um, I would say that you want more exp- you want more testing, you want more validation, and you want the s- a thoughtful uh process where institutions are evaluating. materials but I think in terms of privacy we know that um and and the protections for students that we absolutely are responsible and uh we cannot delegate that um responsibility for the student privacy to uh a vendor which is where you create the problem because we should always be

Right, right, and and I hope that responsibility is is shared among all institutions of higher education. The World Economic Forum's Future of Work report just forecasted that AI literacy creative thinking and curiosity will all be core skills in in twenty twenty, but AI literacy involves more than just learning how to write prompts. People need to know how to critically evaluate AI through ethical and linguistic and social perspectives that reinforce that critical thinking. I I'm thinking of the example of the when we we we recently spoke with Doctor Winthrop she was talking about how like a tenth grade student will write a paper using AI and then put it through a humanizer to make it look like a tenth grade student wrote it so they take out sophisticated language and put in some typos and then if then if the ai is grading it i mean we what what are we doing uh in in education so what is the current state of ai literacy in higher education and how are institutions integrating ai literacy across fields of study especially among the humanities which remain important

uh so our institutions uh like i shared purdue already has put this into their graduation requirements as ai literacy um other institutions are following we believe that it is critical fluency, so you need an understand how it works and why, when to use it, uh but it also has to have those durable human skills as a as the back-end. You need the critical thinking and the judgment to work alongside AI.

Absolutely, and and I've mentioned this before, I'm working on a comprehensive human-based framework to to strengthen uh teaching learning and dignity of work in an AI-enabled economy. I look forward to working with my colleagues, hopefully on both sides of the aisle, to really promote that critical thinking, which will remain important. going forward to improve literacy and professional development, which there is not enough of in not just in the higher ed system but also in the K-twelve system and also protect privacy safety and civil rights. So thank you very much, Mister Chairman, thank you to the witnesses, and I yield back.

Thank you. I would like to um recognize my friend from Missouri, Doctor Hunter.

Thank you, Mister Chairman, and thank you to the witnesses for coming before this subcommittee today. Um, it's no secret that our students are increasingly outsourcing their cognition to generative AI platforms like chat, be, GPT. An October twenty twenty five nati nationwide survey of college students showed that sixty four percent of students used AI to get help with coursework and thirty six percent used AI to write their papers. Uh, there is concern that student outcomes are worsening because AI thinking is replacing student thinking. A September twenty twenty five survey of employers revealed that only twenty-two percent of hiring managers believed that entry-level employees were prepared to do their jobs. Um, the reason, according to most of these employers, is that the upcoming generation lacked the skills needed to thrive in the work p work place because their heads were buried in their cell phones. Constant phone usage, uh, decreases attention spans and leads to poor d- poor academic performance. A study A study monitoring the cell phone usage of university students in Brazil showed that for every one hundred minutes of daily cell phone usage, there was a corresponding drop of six point three percent in academic ra- ranking with with uh with with usage uh during class nearly doubling that drop. And when young people are simultaneously addicted to technology and performing poorly in class they search for an easy way out and they may use AI chat bot to write their papers for them or give them answers to test questions. They can outsource critical thinking skills uh instead of working through problems or asking teachers or peers for the help that they might need. Um I commend institutions like UC Berkeley, School of Law that adopted an AI policy prohibiting students from using AI except to identify sources for research papers. I think it's worth reading a few sentences of that policy aloud. Quote, " Future lawyers may need to use AI fluently, but the current state of technology requires AI use to be coupled with the cognitive skills necessary to strategically deploy the technology, uh, to critically assess its work product, and to uphold ethical obligations to clients and to the legal system. In short, thinking remains the scenic one-on of good lawyering and of a quality legal education. This policy seeks to ensure our courses focus on requisite cognitive skills. It provides students with the opportunity to develop their skills that they need to conceptualize outline draft, revise and edit their work by forbidding use of AI for purposes in connection with work submitted for credit. Uh, this policy was crafted specifically for legal education, but I think uh it can and should be applied in other academic settings. Um, Mr. Horn uh what policies do you think institutions of higher education can adopt uh applicable to any academic discipline that uh student that um ensure that students are not outsourcing their thinking to ai

yeah first i wanna say i appreciate the uh point that you have made and the concern i think it's a very real one at the current moment and i think it speaks to the importance of building foundational knowledge

and i said a lot about cell phone use but i think ai has the potential of these harms we see from cell phone use on steroids.

A hundred percent. And what I would say is this is where we need nuance in the conversation, right? We need, as opposed to an all or nothing, intentional use where it's supporting the kind of personalization we heard earlier? Great. When it's to do the cognitive automation where you're not doing the work, that's a huge problem.

Right. Right.

And so I think building knowledge, foundational knowledge, so you can do the critical thinking and judgment and understand when it's going wrong and right, uh, is critical.

Yes.

and having a clear set of what's the learning objective, what are the tools allowed for it, how are we going to assess it, often that should be real-time oral defenses, real-time conversations with faculty where you can't rely on the crutch. But then conversely, I know many uh uh recent graduates, for example, I I was recently talking to someone uh who produces uh uh uh graduates in film studies. They were applying to entry-level jobs that were expecting them to use AI tools in their production and they had no experience with it from their education.

Yes. Right. Very good.

That's a problem on the flip side.

Thank you. Uh, Mister Fusard, uh, does Florida State, uh, have any any, uh, plans or recommendations in this in this area?

So we so we freely and openly share. We actually have guidelines that are posted that we worked with our faculty, our students, our our university leadership to post, uh, across all disciplines. So, um, we freely and readily share. We also have three, uh, K through twelve, uh, kind of laboratory charter schools. So we're not just a higher education institution, we're looking at this through the whole lens of the K through twelve all the way into higher education and then those that enter the workforce after graduation.

Thank you, I yield back.

Thank you. I'd like to uh recognize my friend from Arizona, Miss. Grehalda.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Um, as the representative for Arizona's seventh congressional district, serving the University of Arizona, Pima Community College, and a diverse student body, I believe that innovation is only progress if it expands opportunity for everyone. Crucially, we must recognize that if we do not provide proper guardrails, AI can quickly turn from a tool for success into a weapon used against our most vulnerable students. I'm concerned that while institutions are being pushed to adopt these new tools, the current administration is dismantling the very federal offices meant to protect students including the Office of Educational Technology and the Office of Civil Rights. These are entities responsible for providing the guidance schools need to prevent documented harms. And also as a school board member for twenty years, these offices were very critically important to the work we did at a very local level. Like a and like the Stanford University study showing AI tools falsely flagging non-native English speakers for plagiarism. This shows that these risks are not rhetorical, they're happening right now. We cannot ask our colleges to be AI ready, while the federal s- government is stripping away the oversight meant to ensure equity and justice in the classroom. Doctor Burns, it's a pleasure to have you here, especially given your ties to our state's higher education system through your time at the uh at Arizona State University. Given your leadership scaling student success across the country, I'd like to start with practical ways we're seeing these technologies implemented on our campuses. Um, colleges and universities are navigating how to integrate AI into academic and student support functions, including academic advising and other student success supports. Reports indicate that some colleges and universities are seeking out strategies to integrate AI into curricula and instruction to advance student success. Could you share some examples of how some colleges and universities are scaling student success initiatives and support uh through AI?

Uh, thank you. Congressman, uh yes, we actually this is one of the challenges is there is so much happening in this space. Um I shared earlier about uh one example where the writing faculty, which was the first department that was most impacted by AI initially, it was the writing departments, they started seeing it uh when ChatGPT was first released. Um they had to s- immediately figure out how you were gonna adapt and how do we make

Mm-hmm.

it so that this is not going to address some of that cognitive burden challenge. Um so figuring out how you use tools as a as a cratic learning tool, how you actually can create ways that it's a prompt that's actually stimulating more creativity and more uh learning from students that's happening in real time across all of my institutions um and i would say the number of experiments is is quite significant and they are sharing in real time part of the challenge is uh that they're we they're literally using ai in so many different facets of the institution and trying to find and develop the coordinating infrastructure that brings those different entities together which did not previously exist is part of the complex

hmm So building on those concerns, I wanna specifically um look specifically at the accountability vacuum left by the loss of federal oversight I mentioned earlier since the federal government has eliminated the offices that once provided safety tool kits and civil rights guidance were often leaving institutions and students defend for themselves when technology fails um with the loss of these centralized federal oversight bodies and the guidance they provided, what entity is currently responsible for holding institutions or private tech vendors accountable when their ai systems produce these types of discriminatory results. And that's for Doctor Burns.

Uh, Congressman, what we are we're very clear that this is actually something that is the responsibility of our own institutions. We cannot actually we uh delegate the responsibility for um, when it comes to students' uh privacy protections, um which w- is part of where the challenge is, is that we're having to evaluate every single vendor individually. Um, in general, uh, there need to be privacy protections that are very clear, enforceable, and modern, and no matter where that enforcement is happening, I know there is transition currently, we just need that, I would say that institutions need the capacity to evaluate the tools, and someone needs to provide that kind of enforcement mechanism, uh, regardless of where they're located. They need to be able to help guide institutions as they're navigating the constantly changing environment.

Yeah, thank you. Beyond just identifying these risks, what specific pathways for recourse currently exists for a student who's been unfairly penalized or academically disciplined due to biased algorithm.

Um, congresswoman, again, we we are very clear that this is not something that we can delegate uh the responsibility for enforcement to any company and so we take that responsibility very seriously and uh we believe very strongly that a human must be in the loop on any consequential decisions and so uh in any of the examples I'm sharing if a decision is made, there has to be a human. brought in and that's how we're building from the ground up.

Okay. Thank you. I yield back.

Thank you. Now I'd like to recognize my friend from Wisconsin, Mister Groffman.

Thank you.

Um, we'll start with Mister Horn, you emphasized that students need real-world work experience because A I is rapidly is rapidly changing the nature of work. How can internships, apprenticeships, and employer-connected projects help ensure students graduate with the necessary skills and experience.

I think when you think about uh building student understanding of what the workplace will look like, there's three modes to think about, is learning about work, learning through work, and then learning at work. And so a college program that starts in the early years with bringing exposure to students so they can understand, hey, this is something I actually want to do, this is something I don't want to do, and rule it out, that iterative nature is important. secondly when they're actually interacting with employers uh in these settings through projects apprenticeships internships and the like they're actually building real world connections real social capital real mentors that can help guide them and get them into jobs in the future one of the myths i think that the younger generation often has is that you get a job by applying online when research shows upwards of fifty percent maybe as high as eighty five percent of jobs are filled by someone in your network And then thirdly, you actually get to experience the real ways that technology is used in these jobs and what professionalism and the durable skills that you need to bring to bear look like in these roles, and you build that fluency while you're in school. That's the, uh, entry-level experience you need to get that first job.

OK. What barriers do you think students face when trying to just start out with an internship or apprenticeship related to AI?

Yep.

I think the biggest thing right now is that schools are not providing the instru- uh infrastructure nearly enough to actually make that a default option. What I hear from a lot of the schools that I talk to is, oh we offer that, but only our top students take advantage of it. This should be the default for every single student, so no one's falling through the cracks. They should be doing it on the front-end of the academic planning, so it's part of the process. Career services shouldn't be the afterthought that's at the end of the process.

Okay, Mister Fosard, one of my concerns about AI is that it could lead to a decrease in human involvement in the workplace due to over-involvement on technology. How is Florida State's Information Technology Services internship program ensuring that human oversight is not removed?

Uh, thank you for that question. I actually was a product of a student internship. Um, I got into my career in technology because of that. And, uh, we have a hundred and fifty student interns. that go through each semester, hands-on experience, hands-on learning with artificial intelligence and how we can use it at the university. And those are positions from cyber security to helping assisting with our enrollment, to uh doing student support services. And our results in those internships show because we have a ninety-nine percent uh fall to uh spring uh retention rate in our university and we're using these students not just as uh workers that are grabbing coffee or making copies, but actually using the technology and having hands-on experience before they graduate. Um, we're seeing these students not just succeed but thrive in their careers.

Okay. Uh, this is a broader question. One of the things that concerns me about AI, when you look at other pa- uh platforms, even in the past, even if you just Google something, uh, when you begin to look over time, you see an ideological bent to what comes back. And as it is, you know, you read articles generated by A I. And over time you begin to see a little bits of ideological bias as well, in which maybe things in history disappear, and things that were minor in history all of a sudden are exaggerated. It becomes a very, very scary thing. Um, and I don't know what to do about it, but would any of you like to take a shot on what we can do to make sure in the future, i can trust if i use ai that i'm getting something that is factual not ideologically tilted

hello

i uh just just briefly i think that this is where education has to play a major role the critical thinking skills cannot be replaced by artificial intelligence and this is where k through twelve education and higher education must be present and we must equip our students with those critical thinking skills um to be able to leverage those tools and to be able to question those tools

but but my question is i think people what they learn is gonna be based on what ai gives them right we already have the schools i believe overwhelmingly biased because we have overwhelmingly biased faculty now if you have overwhelmingly biased ai or even a little bit biased ai in which irrelevant parts of history are you know you can you can create a world view I don't see how we do that, no matter how good the student is, if his reference becomes AI.

Okay.

I I wou- I would just argue that um, you know, any technology, any media, anything that we have access to, we have to use critical thinking skills to be able And twenty nine. to determine and to differentiate fact from fiction. And so I view AI as a technology and a tool. It's not a a magic eight ball. Um, it has to use data and it has to have um compute power to be able to give and provide answers and i think that if we view ai through this lens of um being kind of the sole source of truth we negate the human aspect which i think is so so important to be able to differentiate fact from fiction

okay thank you thank you um now i'd like to whoops now i'd like to recognize my friend from california uh mr uh mr doctor sonia

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Um, well I wanna thank you all for being here. It's fascinating. Uh, I'd like to talk first of all to Mr. Burns about, um, the behavioral health a health aspect of kids as they develop and go to college. I think r- uh, where am I? So, Dr. Burns. Um, I just flew in, so forgive me. I'm jet lag. Uh, I'd uh, speaking of jet lag, so the University of California I think recently over the weekend was talking about reestablishing te- standardized testing because so many of the students that they're getting are the the professors uh just don't feel like they're noticeably not prepared um so when it comes to behavioral health in kids we've got a lot of good research now developing about the effect on cognitive development and social media in general um but particularly with ai is quite frightening i just had a meeting with the authors of the aicon and and it's just uh it's a combination of marketing and as a member from the Bay Area who has friends in tech who warned me that uh we're doing the same thing with AI, that we did with social medias, we're marketing. Um and unfortunately, caveat emptor, I don't think kids are prepared to be aware of particularly the sophistication of how their brains are being developed when they're on um on this AI. So could you speak a little bit about that as first do no harm, how are we dealing with cognitive development and A I and how do we get at least a s- a standard of first do no harm before we really know how bad this is, particularly by the time they get to higher education.

Uh Congressman, I uh I think your concerns are shared broadly, um not just within the academic environment, we're seeing that this is gonna create long-term effects because this is a workforce readiness challenge as well. Um I think this is a place where we need more investment in federal research, because we need to have far more testing uh to happen, not just you know bef- like on the actual models as they're developing, but the the short, medium and long-term effects on students. It is happening so quickly and um I would say this is a space where there is a a need for not just a federal research investment but to have it be multi-institutional, so that we're actually pulling together the expertise across the country, because I think this is not something that you want one institution or one entity to figure out how we do it better. You want this to actually spread broadly.

And I have a bill just um that I have with some other members, just it's like a warning um bill uh that would just tell parents that when you go online, this is just for social media, but make it stronger for AI. Just sort of like tobacco or liquor, make parents and kids be aware that when you go on here you really don't know the power, um and how sophisticated it is. Could you respond to that? Now anyone else would respond to it. And the gist, the gist of everything I'm trying to get at is, is having spent a lot of time on this, having spent a lot of time with experts in the Bay Area at Stanford, particularly both pediatric uh neuro neurological pediatricians and people in the education school there is and their relationship with artificial intelligence um and with s- technology. How do we have a discussion about we don't wanna inhibit innovation, but the other hand we've gotta slow it down so we make sure the full and the fact that most people don't realize how targeted these algorithms are becoming.

Um, Congressman, again, I I just wanna reinforce that um your your concerns are shared broadly for parents, everywhere, young people and our faculty are contemplating this on a daily basis as students are coming into the classroom we're trying to analyze exactly what is happening and to really study the learning effects I would say that this field is somewhat nascent that this is a space where we need to do more research we need to actually um interrogate this uh all along the way but again it also is just so clear to me the lack of broader coordination to ensure that institutions are pulling together on this. This is not a challenge that any one human being will be able to to tackle or one institution will tackle you need the entire higher education sector to be enrolled in figuring out how to use AI responsibly because we take protecting our students very seriously and we don't delegate that responsibility anyone else. The real thing is who's missing up here are the AI providers.

Right.

And that's these models are being released so quickly, and the question of whether or not they're having the level of efficacy testing prior to release is something that definitely needs to be paid attention to.

And I hear that in the Bay Area when I go out and talk to people, they're like, oh, you're inhibiting innovation. I said, that's what you told me fifteen years ago. And I don't wanna inhibit infe innovation, but we've gotta be careful of the consequences. you can make a lot of money, but we're not fully aware. And one of the best stories on this, and I'll wrap up, sorry I didn't get to have you respond, is the YouTube story about pre-adolescent adolescent girls being targeted by their algorithm so that thirty percent of them were predisposed to suicidal, uh uh, ideation and depression, to the point where the YouTube algorithms would bring them all the way to a YouTube that showed them how to commit suicide. And if it wasn't for a reporter, we might not have found that f- that out at all. So with that, I will thank you, I apologize for not having been giving you enough time to talk uh answer my questions. And thank you, Mr. Chairman, now you're back.

Thank you. I'd like to recognize my friend from Florida, Mr. Fein.

Well thank you, Mr. Chairman. Um for the last couple of weeks I've been having a lot of nostalgia. My my oldest son um graduated from high school two weeks ago and I've thought about how his high school and junior high career has changed as he gets ready to go to college. He was one of the kids who went home for spring break in sixth grade and then had the longest spring break ever because they never went back to school because of COVID. And then his junior high was ruined because of many of the terrible decisions the government made about how to deal with COVID, something that the kids graduating now about to go off to universities are probably behind forever because of the decisions that were made. But now I've gotten to watch over the last year how AI has affected his senior year. And fortunately, he was smart enough to realize that if you had AI write your paper, Um, there might be AI that could figure out that you used AI to write your paper as some of his classmates learned the hard way. So we have seen that these technologies are changing how the world works. And I I apologize to other three witnesses, my questions are gonna be for the home for the home state, um, Florida State, where my son did apply and was admitted, but I'm sorry, he he's going out of state. I won't say where. But um um I I wanted to ask you though a question about a bill I've introduced. H R eighty-seven forty-seven, the K-twelve AI Literacy and Readiness Act. So, the bill recognizes that AI is becoming as foundational as computers and the internet. It fundamentally modernizes schools to help integrate new this new technology, equip teachers, and prepare students to compete in an AI-driven economy in a safe and responsible way. Do you believe that if if K-twelve schools, um, begin preparing students with AI concepts and tools, will those Florida students be better prepared to succeed at places like Florida State, and in the economy shaped by AI.

I uh Congressman, I think that you have to have those baseline skills um in the K through twelve space to translate into higher education and translate into the workplace. I think the earlier that we can get those skills in a safe, secure environment with our students, the more likely that they'll be successful in using the the the technology. And to the other Congressman's question, they'll be able to evaluate it um in the right ways on how they're using it with the critical thinking skills and and what what works and what doesn't.

And my bill, to be clear, isn't just about training students. Students to some degree can figure it out faster than we can because they're younger. My my son is much more advanced in the use of AI than his fifty-two year old father, who by the way spent twenty-two years building software companies, so I see how fast the world world has changed. But I wanna talk about what all this means. Um, people worry that AI is gonna replace the jobs on which we rely and depend on. Um, frankly, for many of I I think particularly some of my colleagues, I think the people who used to write their speeches are replaced by AI. Um, unfortunately not me. But without exaggeration, whether we welcome it or not, we should we should welcome this inevitable reality. Technology has changed how the world works since the horse and buggy, and we didn't look back, we looked forward, and we have to do that here as well. Um, our education system, though, has a challenge to prepare them for the reality, to not train them for the jobs that will no longer exist, but to train them for the ones that will. So what can universities do? What could Florida State do, the other universities in our number one in America state university system in Florida? Uh, what can we do to ensure students don't lose the critical thinking, the problem solving, the communication, and other foundational skills that many believe could be eroded by AI?

I I think it it it comes down to access. We have to give ubiquitous access across all disciplines, not just one discipline. It's not just computer science majors. It has to be every major that goes through a collegiate system, has to have access to the technologies in a secure environment. I would also offer that Florida State University, we are giving a um AI kind of foundational certification that every student has access to take to build those skill sets up. And it's regardless of discipline, regardless of program, everybody has access to that to build those skills. I think it's very important to lead, not follow.

All right, well since I have a few minutes left, I'm gonna let someone from my alma mater actually answer the question, even though he's not from Mr. Horn, I don't know if you've got any thoughts on these questions.

I think this is why it's so uh critical to frankly build knowledge, right, as we uh start uh the the uh progress up and recognize that the use of AI in different domains is going to look differently in different places. And so each domain is gonna have to be very intentional about how it uses AI and what are the foundational knowledge building blocks and then, what are the skills of integrating AI. The one analogy I would say is when we had calculators introduced several decades ago, we still learned how to add, subtract, do multiplication and frankly memorize multiplication tables. Then you could use the calculators to help you, but otherwise you're uh

As I've had to remind my fourteen year old.

And it's an important fact uh that we still need to build those uh cognitive literacies.

Well thank you. Look, I think the key thing is this is going to change incredibly fast. It's not just that the world is changing, the rate at which it is changing is changing faster and we've all gotta be prepared to deal with that to make sure our kids are prepared for the future. Thank you, Mister Chairman, and I yield back.

Thank you. I'd like to now recognize my friend from Virginia, Mrs. Scott.

Thank you, thank you, Mr. Chairman. Um, Mrs. Burns, you indicated, m- Dr. Burns, you indicated um that well-resourced institutions need to disseminate the information they gain to lesser-resourced information uh resour- uh institutions. Exactly how would they do that?

Uh, Congressman, thank you for the question, uh, so this is my biggest concern, is that it's shouldn't be left on the responsibility of the institutions themselves. They can make decisions about how they build things. The example I shared from ASU of they actually built the entire triangulator outside of ASU's system so others could use it. Um the real question is who is or what i- infrastructure is missing uh in terms of ensuring coordination that that institutions across the country are able to know what experiments are happening what have you learned um can I can I borrow that that language that you used in that contract how do how is this a good vendor to use or not? All of these questions right now are lying on just people happening to know who to talk to and given that AI who's the actual professional responsible for AI is adapting in real time this is a huge space that has challenges K twelve has uh something called the EdSafe alliance which has played a critical coordinating function so that uh uh lessons learned about literacy safety and privacy are spreading we think that something similar needs to exist in higher ed.

Thank you. Uh, Mister Fassad, um, how is uh student data protected and not misused? And how do you make sure that students know how their data is being collected?

Uh, that's a great question and thank you for asking it. A one of the the frameworks that we have at Florida State University is to make sure that we sign agreements with companies to make sure that our data isn't used, to train models. Um, it's one of the foundational aspects at Florida State University, and I think every university should ensure that, that there's

And uh AI can be used for administration in colleges as well as the teaching. How would it be used in admissions and administration? And perspe particularly how would you avoid racial discrimination in this application?

Uh you could you could you repeat I sorry.

You're using uh if you can use AI in admissions?

Uh correct, yeah, we use it across the universe.

In administration, and how would you make sure that racial discrimination isn't embedded in those algorithms?

Yeah, so we we still believe strongly in a human in the loop, and I think it needs to be

So there'd be no um loophole or uh for racial discrimination just because you're using A I. Okay. Uh, Mister Horne, how is the graduate school preparing teachers to use A I?

Uh it the candid answer is it's uneven across different faculty and classes at the moment, uh and we're we're all trying to figure it out right now in different ways.

All right. Um, Sudhak, you've indicated that um AI is used and um job skills, what kind of jobs do you see AI well-prepared AI students doing much better on the job than those that are poorly at

Well certainly knowledge work um is is one of the most impacted domains uh for AI ready job skills so I would say any knowledge work that you can think of whether you're going to be an accountant or a consultant students who can leverage AI to create work products the first day on the job are gonna do better than students who do not um students who are going into more hands-on jobs in the trades are less affected by that Um, but that's the domain, uh, that we see impacted the most.

Is that the kind of thing that you can, uh, pick up by job training?

I- in the knowledge base sector?

Right.

Uh, it is, however, you're gonna have a hard time competing against a student that already has those skills on day one.

Thank you, Mister Chairman.

Thank you. I can now recognize my friend from Guam, Mr. Moreland.

Thank you, Mister Chairman, uh, panel. Thank you for your testimonies. And uh, Doctor Duke, first question for you, in your written testimony you stated access to higher education in the United States has always been shaped by geography, economics and the ability uh of support structures. Uh, I totally agree with you and I don't think anyone knows this better than the people of Guam and the millions of Americans who call the territories home. Small economies and geographic isolations often mean that territorial development lags behind CONUS. So, how is McGraw-Hill and other private entities working to expand access to higher education and critical workforce skills in geographically isolated parts of the US?

Great question, and thank you for calling that out in my testimony. The f- the first way that we're doing that is is integrating AI-enabled product experiences into our products and so if you buy our products you are getting that access baked in. One of the things I wanted to talk about earlier I wasn't able to get in is that we keep bringing together the idea that an LL M is the same as AI enabled product experiences embedded into an existing platform that a student might use. They're two different things, they're managed in different ways and so in terms of access and our ability to make those kinds of features whether it is um uh features that help a student translate content into their native language whether it is the ability for a student to get extra support after a faculty member is is not around late at night we bake those into our products so the access extends to anyone using our platforms that's primarily how we do that

thank you doctor dude uh mister horn uh you used electricity and factories analogy uh to describe using AI in the workplace and how innovation requires us to rethink traditional processes. But it's also true that AI should not come at the expense of human dignity. Uh, Pope Leo recently stated, work is not considered simply as a problem to be dealt with or means of generating income, but a fundamental good for the person, a principle of economic activity, key to the entire societal questions. Through work, human beings bring their freedom, creativity, and the capacity for cooperation into play, contributing to the cultural and moral evaluation of society. Thought and creativity should not be replaced with chat, GBT, nor should we see humans display displaced because of mass adoption. Instead, AI should enhance learning outcomes, job performance, and see our country become more competitive rather than complacent. So how can institutions, industries, and government come together to work towards measurable progress to keep the US and the leader in education and innovation?

Thank you for your question. I share the concern and what I would say is a few things. Number one, fundamentally in education we are about building human capital and the human dignity dignity of each individual and that's the center. of the enterprise. And so everything should start from that, uh, point. The second one I would say is there is a view of the future of work where it becomes, uh, uh, fewer people working. I don't share that view. I think that what we have seen throughout history is that when technology makes something abundant, the things around it all of a sudden seem scarce and human ingenuity leans into that. And so much so the importance of making sure that individuals in education institutions have opportunities to do real work with real employers, build those connections, build that understanding of work, what work looks like, so that they can become the creators of those jobs and companies and uh processes in the future that will power the American economy. And I think the more we give those opportunities, the more we will continue to signal that the human is the center of that.

Thank you. Oh, one final final question for you, sir, Mr. Horne. Building off your point that colleges need to redesign their models as AI reshapes education and the workforce for students in places like Guam, where geography can limit access to specialized programs and employer-connected learning opportunities. How can AI help overcome geographical barriers and prepare students for careers and opportunities of the future?

It's really interesting. When online learning burst on the scene, it all of a sudden created much more access regardless of where you were to expertise. What I think AI is now doing is uh, for the first time we've heard a lot about virtual reality simulations and things like that over the years. We can actually now create those at scale that bring it to people wherever they may be, uh, and give them access to those real embedded opportunities, regardless of what the local ecosystem looks like.

Thank you, panel. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Thank you. Uh, we'll now move toward, uh, move to our closing re- uh, r- closing remarks. I'd like to recognize, uh, Dr. Adams for her closing remarks.

Thank you, mister. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Um, let me just um first of all thank all of the witnesses uh again for testifying today. Uh, today's discussion has reinforced a a simple reality. AI is is not a future issue. It's already affecting how students learn. how faculty teach, how institutions operate, and how employers evaluate skills and qualifications. The decisions we make now will - will shape whether this technology expands opportunity or deepens existing inequities. No one is suggesting that we should ignore innovation or try to stop technological progress. The question is whether we will put in place the - the nes- the safeguards necessary to ensure that that innovation serves the the public interest. Students should not have to worry that that an opaque algorithm w will determine their educational opportunities. Faculty should not be left without guidance as as these tools become more integrated in classrooms, and institutions should not be forced to navigate these challenges alone. As AI continues to evolve, guardrails become more important, not less, We need transparency, accountability, strong protections for student data, robust uh enforcement of civil rights laws, and clear guidance that helps institutions use these tools safely and responsibly. Higher education has always been about preparing people for the future. I spent forty years uh in the classroom uh at Bennett College in Greensboro, North Carolina. And I know that our responsibility is to ensure that

Thank you. Um, I'm I'm going to to highlight what the uh chairman of full committee said. Uh, this is a a hearing I wish all of my colleagues Um and also can see the bipartisanship we have here. We we all have concerns uh of make sure there's a balance between opportunities and also the dangers of this process, but uh I I I came across a a quote just just couple uh just couple days ago, productivity, productive capacity is power. Um I'm so excited uh for teachers like my parents. My dad was a professor at Floyd Inn for forty years, mom was a high school teacher. And they th- their eyes, they just were so excited about seeing the the eyes of their kids, that are teaching, that just open up, their confidence grow, and that was their mission. I'm so excited about teachers like that, in the future we have as we produce really I think one of the most productive generations coming if we make sure we down-balance this right. Uh, I I wrote down just a couple words as we were going through this, I just wanted to share with you guys. Uh, words like this disruption, sharing of open AI uh uh open AI, we even got into electricity, we talked about paradigm shift of electricity. Um, personalized learning at scale, uh, ubiquitous access, and we talk about colleges like the HPUs that uh, that would need this, uh, knowledge work, uh, critical thinking, human dignity dignity. Uh, this, these are all words that we can now say we have a great opportunity to to embrace. Uh, I cannot wait to see the the protect- the productivity we're gonna have our kids coming in their futures. They, they begin to understand how to critical think and and work in this process. And I wanna thank you also, you and your industry. Um, this is a remarkable time, and we need to have people that are smart, that are passionate, that have the intelligence, the wisdom to know the difference and, and also to know that you can lean in and, and uh, and um, and, and have this collaborative effort to make sure that we all grow as a country. This is a very important time for our country's future. And this process you're gonna go through right now and what you represent, well, we'll make sure we're leading in a in a good w- good way. So I wanna thank you uh for all the work you're doing, for work that we'll be seeing in the near future. Um And I'd like to again thank the witnesses for taking the time to testify before the subcommittee committee today without objections and there being no further business the subcommittee stands adjourned. Thank you.

John's changing. Thank you, they call.

I know, it's allergy, oops.

Always.