House seal

House · Hearing transcript

Field Hearing on Discussion Draft of Great American Outdoors Act 250

Friday, June 12, 2026

Summary

  • Westerman and Huffman advanced the bipartisan Great American Outdoors Act 250 to reauthorize nearly two billion dollars annually as deferred maintenance exceeds 40 billion dollars.

  • Katharine MacGregor (Deputy Secretary, US Department of the Interior) said only 14% of Legacy Restoration Fund dollars funded completed projects averaging over four years.

  • Ranking Member Huffman pressed MacGregor on keeping funds for deferred maintenance, not vanity projects, and avoiding immigration enforcement at park entrances.

  • Both parties backed reauthorization, but Democrats emphasized staffing losses and protecting historic interpretation while Republicans stressed permitting reform and energy revenues.

  • The bill would sustain gateway economies like Hot Springs ahead of America 250, with the hearing record open ten days for follow-up questions.

Transcript PDF

Download the full transcript as a PDF

Ready to print, read offline or share, with the summary, everyone who spoke and the video time of every paragraph.

Your PDF downloads right away. We also email you a link to it, for another device.

Hearing Details

Witnesses

Members Who Spoke

View on Congress.gov

Transcript

6:17 – 10:52

The hearing will come to order. Good morning and welcome to the Natural Resources Committee field hearing here in my hometown of beautiful Hot Springs National Park Arkansas I'm gonna take a moment of personal privilege just to explain a little bit about the Natural Resources Committee and the work that we're doing here today. This is a standing committee in the United States House of Representatives. My name's Bruce Westerman. I'm the uh congressman from this area, born and raised in Hot Springs, and I got the great honor of being the chairman of the committee uh this year. Uh the Natural Resources Committee has a broad jurisdiction over uh all of our federal lands, which includes the the Park Service, and everything in the Department of Interior with the uh Bureau of Land Management, the US Fish and Wildlife. Also we have some jurisdiction over the Forest Service, uh hundreds of millions of acres of public land across our country that uh we all love. This committee has jurisdiction over. We also have jurisdiction over uh a lot of water, over two billion acres of off-shore water falls under the jurisdiction of our committee. We have jurisdiction over energy and mining, so oil and gas and minerals falls under the jurisdiction of our committee, uh water, wildlife and fisheries falls under our committee, so uh fishing regulations and uh wildlife protections, if you look at the uh some of the major legislation that falls under our committee, uh you get things like the uh National Environmental Policy Act, the Endangered Species Act, the Historic Preservation Act. Those things fall under our committee jurisdiction and we also have jurisdiction over what's called Indian and insular affairs. So all the the tribal issues in our country as well as the five territories of uh Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam, Northern Marianas and American Samoa. Uh as I mentioned this committee travels a lot. Uh we a a few years ago did a bipartisan uh exercise called the Compact of free association with Micronesia, Palau and the Marshall Islands, and we held a field hearing in Guam when we did that. We've also, we've held field hearings in Yosemite. We've held uh field hearings in the national parks in Utah. And just last September we held a field hearing in um uh in Wyoming and on the Great American Outdoors Act at Grand Tetons National Park. And today we're in Hot Springs. as we work on the Great American Outdoors Act two fifty, which is H R ninety two fifty. That my friend Jared Huffman, uh the ranking member on the committee from California and I are uh co-sponsors of that bill and that's the reason we're here today is to have a hearing on on the bill. I do wanna thank the National Park Service, the Department of Interior, uh this beautiful Arlington Hotel and Resort for making their lobby available for us. and uh providing such a wonderful setting for today's discussion. Uh I'm grateful again to be joined by Ranking Member Huffman from California. He's again my Democrat co-lead on the bill. We're also joined by several bipartisan colleagues on the Natural Resources Committee including Representative Cliff Bence from Oregon uh Representative Harriet Hagerman from Wyoming Representative Jeff Crank of Colorado, Representative Teresa Ledger-Fernandez from New Mexico, uh Val, Representative Val Hoyle from Oregon and Representative Maxine Dexter of Oregon. Oregon is well represented. Oregon has a lot of federal lands as well. Uh I do want to, before we begin, remind everybody about the rules of decorum for official congressional proceedings. I ask that there not be any kind of disruption regarding the testimony given here today. It is important that we respect the rules of the committee and of the house and to allow the members and the public to hear our proceedings. Now we will begin hearing um uh we we will begin today's hearing like every day of Congress begins with the prayer and the pledge and I want to uh invite my pastor uh Doctor Chuck um Devane from Lake Hamilton Baptist Church to come to the stage and also Miss Bobby Wilson who is a retired school teacher. Chuck will lead the prayer. Then we have the Hot Springs High School Color Guard who will present the colors. And Bobby will lead us in the pledge. So if we can all stand.

10:57 – 12:00

Thank you, Chairman. Let us pray. Our Heavenly Father, we begin today by bowing before you to acknowledge you as our creator, our sustainer, our father, and our friend. We thank you for your amazing grace and for the abundance of beauty and natural resources and parks that you have surrounded us with in this community. in this great country. We pray that today we'll prove to be good stewards of them. Lead in God our Chairman, Congressman Westerman, and all of his colleagues today to act in a true bipartisan spirit, to collegiality, to act in ways and means that are honorable to you and in the best interest of all concern. We pray for those who testify and speak, their words will be honest and heartfelt and helpful. And we pray as the deliberations unfold and decisions are made that they will reflect a simple faith in you. a sincere love and respect for one another and a steadfast hope for future generations. And I offer this prayer to people of all faiths, and even to those of no faith, in faith in my great God and Savior Jesus Christ, in whose name I pray. Amen.

12:01 – 12:01

Amen.

12:03 – 13:01

Here we go. And we bow. Oh, word. Work though, work. Build a guard, hold. Left face. Present, build a guard. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Okay. Go, Liz.

13:42 – 21:29

Thank you. Let's Give a big round of applause to the Hot Springs Hospital Junior OTC. Before we begin our official business, I uh need to announce uh that a few housekeeping items under committee rule four F, any oral opening statements at hearings are limited to the chairman and the ranking minority member. I therefore ask unanimous consent that all members' opening statements be made part of the hearing record. if they are submitted in accordance with committee rule three O. Without objection, so ordered. I now recognize myself for an opening statement. And again, welcome. Uh, we're so glad you're here today. Welcome to all of my colleagues who traveled across the country. Thank you to all the witnesses who made time in their schedule to be here to talk about such um important piece of legislation. Like many Arkansans, Some of my favorite memories were made outdoors on Arkansas's three million acres plus of public land, whether that was floating down the Buffalo, camping, hunting and fishing in the Ouachita and Ozark National Forest, maybe duck hunting at first light in our wildlife refuges, or hiking and mountain biking here and in around Hot Springs and across our beautiful natural state. These experiences taught me firsthand why our public lands matter. and why it's so important that we steward them well for future generations. Under the leadership of Governor Sarah Sanders and First Gentleman Brian Sanders, more and more people are discovering the natural state as a premier world-class destination for outdoor recreation activities, like mountain biking, rock climbing, hunting, fishing and more. Arkan- Arkansans know that long before Yellowstone was designated as the first national park, Congress protected thermal waters here in Hot Springs in eighteen thirty-two, creating America's first federal reservation of a natural resource, making Hot Springs the birthplace of what a lot of people call America's best idea. Today, Hot Springs serves as a powerful example of what can happen when federal investment, local leadership and private partnerships come together. Thanks in part to the original Great American Outdoors Act, we're seeing historic assets restored, visitor experiences improved, and new economic opportunities created throughout this community. The rehabilitation of the Maurice Bathhouse will vitalize an important piece of Arkansas history while creating new opportunities for public use and private investment. It's this model that makes our national park the perfect backdrop for what we are here to discuss today. Legislation that would maintain and modernize our national parks and our public lands, called the Great American Outdoors Act two fifty. I was proud to support the original Great American Outdoors Act five years ago when it was signed into law by President Trump. It represented the largest investment in public lands infrastructure in generations and provided long overdue resources to address deteriorating trails, campgrounds, visitor facilities, and historic structures across the country. The results have been significant across the Department of Interior, The program has funded hundreds of projects, improved thousands of assets, supported jobs and addressed billions of dollars in deferred maintenance. Here in Arkansas alone, more than fifty-two million dollars has been invested in projects at Hot Springs National Park, the Buffalo National River, the Del Bumpers Wa- River National Wildlife Refuge, and the Washington National Forest. Those investments have improved visitor access, strengthened recreation opportunities, and supported some of our state's most treasured public lands. But six years later, it is clear there is still more work to do. Deferred maintenance across federal lands now exceeds forty billion dollars. Record visitation continues to place new demands on aging infrastructure. While inflation and rising construction costs make needed repairs even more expensive, we have also learned important lessons about how these funds are allocated, how projects are selected, how agencies measure deferred maintenance, and how we can better leverage partnerships to stretch taxpayer dollars even further. That's why we came together as Republicans and Democrats to set aside partisan differences and craft the Great American Outdoors Act, two fifty. This bipartisan legislation builds on the successes of the original law, while addressing lessons learned through implementation and ensuring funding is focused on improving the visitor experience. The legislation includes significant reforms that create new public access, strength in public-private partnerships. prioritize improvements to outdoor recreation infrastructure, improve transparency and accountability, modernize project selection, support sportsmen and women, and streamline project delivery. This legislation also creates a new outdoor recreation and sportsmen's access pilot program, giving flexibility to agencies to invest in high priority projects across the nation that may not meet the textbook definition of deferred maintenance. For Arkansas, This means restoring overnight camping in the Ouachita National Forest, restoring public access and outdoor recreation after the Forest Service has decommissioned roughly one-fourth of the forest campsites since twenty-ten. This pilot program will also help us restore wildlife habitat in our national wildlife refuges. This builds on the successful Red Cockaded Woodpecker restoration project in the Felsenthal National Wildlife Refuge, which not only restored the Red Cockaded Woodpecker but created new public improved outdoor recreation, and restored habitat for a host of other species. One of the best parts of this legislation is that it builds on the model of hot springs, by recognizing the federal government can accomplish this alone. We need partnerships with non-profit organizations, private partners and gateway communities. These partnerships not only stretch federal dollars further, they make projects move more quickly and efficiently. But that's not the only benefit of this bill. The last iteration of the Great American Outdoors Act created more than seventy-two thousand five hundred new jobs contributed fifteen point nine billion dollars in economic output and supported the one point three trillion outdoor recreation economy in Arkansas our outdoor recreation economy has an economic impact of nearly five billion dollars in sports, more than forty-three thousand eight hundred jobs. Gateway communities like Hot Springs will benefit from these investments through increased tourism, new construction jobs and spending both inside and outside the park. On the eve of our nation's two hundred and fiftyth anniversary celebrations, we have an opportunity to leave America's public lands better than we found them. Because the American people deserve national parks and public lands that not only meet but exceed their expectations when they visit with their families and create lifelong memories. Through the Great American Outdoors Act two fifty, we have an opportunity to uplift places like Hot Springs National Park, restore campgrounds, trails and recreation infrastructure across our forest and public lands, and ensure that future generations can enjoy the same experiences that so many of us were fortunate to grow up with. That is what stewardship looks like, and that is what this legislation is designed to accomplish. Again, I want to thank all the members and witnesses for traveling to Hot Springs today. It is an honor to welcome you to my hometown, and I look forward to discussing how we continue to together to steward America's public lands for the next two hundred and fifty years. And with that, I'll now recognize the ranking member of the Natural Resources Committee, Representative Jared Huffman of California, for his opening statement.

21:30 – 26:49

Thank you, Chair Westerman, and good morning, everyone. I wanna start by expressing my sincere gratitude to Chairman Westerman for hosting us today in this beautiful place, his home state of Arkansas. Uh, this is actually the second time I've had uh the opportunity to travel here and spend some time with Bruce. Last time we went mountain biking, we toured a forest, uh we saw some of these historic uh bath houses. It was a great visit and uh I got a chance to experience a lot of what the natural state has to offer. Uh this really is a marvelous place. And uh we are gonna return the favor by bringing uh Chair Westerman to the North Coast of California, my district. where I look forward to showing him some of the beautiful places that I have the honor of representing. But, uh, I wanna also extend my deepest thanks to this community of Hot Springs, the staff here at the park, and the people of Arkansas for their incredible hospitality and welcoming us so warmly. Hot Springs, uh, is a good place to have this conversation, uh, with its rich, long history of conservation, uh, the place to talk about the future of the Great American Outdoors Act and also the Legacy Restoration Fund. When the Great American Outdoors Act first passed six years ago, uh, it really was a historic bipartisan win. It proved that we can still come together to protect the places that define our nation. Um, at that time Congress made a promise to fix our parks and to tackle decades of deferred maintenance throughout the park system. And we also locked in permanent funding of the Land and Water Conservation Fund which is one of the most successful conservation programs this country has ever had. The LWCF has uh a strong connection to the conservation story right here in Hot Springs, contributing over fourteen point seven million dollars to protect critical inholdings inside park boundaries. That promise is still uh something that both parties believe in, but we have a lot of work to do to make sure we continue to keep it. Our parks and public lands are more popular than ever as Chair Westerman noted, visitation keeps climbing. And it's clear that Americans know these places are worth protecting. So fixing them is a debt that I think we should see as something that we owe, not just to ourselves, uh, but to the generations who come after us. That's what the Legacy Restoration Fund is all about. It has delivered real results in every corner of the country and helped us start chipping away at this maintenance backlog that has weighed on our land agencies for decades. As we look toward the future and the upcoming uh America two fifty celebration, Great American Outdoors Act two fifty gives us a chance to build on five years of progress. But how we spend this money matters, and we need to be very deliberate. So I look forward to the conversation today to begin um the the direction that we need to make good on this promise. It is tempting of course to chase high profile ribbon cutting projects. Uh those do matter. But the work that keeps our parks running often goes unseen. Essential infrastructure like wastewater treatment facilities, upgraded utility systems, and structural repairs may not always be visible to the average visitor. But these things are absolutely vital. These investments keep people safe. They keep the gates open. They keep our parks ready for the crowds that show up every year. And the Great American Outdoors Act two fifty will make sure that those things are prioritized. Our national parks We're built on a simple idea. These are places that belong to all of us. They are meant to be common ground where we come together to celebrate our shared heritage where we reckon with our complicated history and we all stand, on equal footing. It only works if our parks stay open and welcoming to everyone. And it only works if the people who run them are still on the job, telling the full and honest story of our country, and certainly not a narrow, sugar-coated slice of it. Before I wrap up my remarks, Chair Westerman, I just wanna take a moment to talk about the importance of staff. Since the beginning of last year, the National Park Service has lost roughly a quarter of its permanent workforce. It's hard to overstate what that means on the ground. The rangers, the geologists, the historians, the archaeologists, officers, engineers, these are all people who hold our parks together. Programs like the Legacy Restoration Fund only work if the right people are there to get the job done. So why I, while I welcome the new flexibility in streamline, a streamlining that we've built into this bill, uh, the commitment to these people is also very, very important. And legislation is no substitute for a fully staffed agency. You can't fix a park without people who care for it. We owe it to Hot Springs and to every treasured place across this great country to keep investing in the future. As we mark our country's two hundred and fiftieth birthday, we have a chance, a bipartisan chance, to make sure that our public lands stay what they always were meant to be, places that bring us together as one nation. And I look forward to a constructive bipartisan conversation here today. Thank you, Chair Westerman, and I yield back.

26:52 – 27:32

Thank you, Ranking Member Huffman. We will now move on to our panel of witnesses, and I'll remind the witnesses that under committee rules, uh, you'll have five minutes for an oral opening statement, but your entire statement will appear in the hearing record. To begin your testimony, press the on button on the microphone, we use uh timing lights, when you begin the light will turn green, at the end of five minutes the light will turn red, and uh that'll be time to to wrap up your statement. Uh again thank you to the witnesses, I will now recognize our first witness, the Honorable Chris French, Associate Chief of the US Forest Service, Associate Chief French. You're recognized for five minutes.

27:33 – 32:11

Good morning. Thank you so much, Chairman Westerman, Ranking Member Huffman and members of the committee. Thank you for the opportunity to appear before the committee today and travel to the historic hot springs to celebrate the success of the Great American Outdoors Act and the ideas and the continued work for addressing the mountain def- the mounting deferred maintenance across America's extraordinary public lands. My name is Chris French. I serve as the Associate Chief of the USDA Forest Service. And across the Forest Service, nearly a hundred and s- sixty million visi- visitors recreate our national forests each year. They visit our lands to hike, camp, ski, hunt and fish, boat and ride bikes and off-highway vehicles. These recreationists, as well as loggers, ranchers, firefighters, emergency responders, energy companies, outfitters, and guides, and others, rely on the nearly three hundred and sixty-eight thousand miles of roads, the thirty thousand recreation sites and the bridges and trails and more that compromise the National Forest System infrastructure portfolio. As we s- as stewards of these lands, it's our job to ensure that visitors to the national forest, whatever their objective, stay safe and are able to undertake what they came to do to connect with these lands. Achieving this goal has been an ongoing challenge. Forest service infrastructure is deteriorating faster than the funding can maintain it. But while this challenge persists, the Great American Outdoors Act for the last five years has significantly expanded the forest service's ability to address our maintenance backlog. Through the LRF fund, we have funded more than twelve hundred projects across forty-three states. This work is improving critical infrastructure that supports public access, forest management, wildfire response, and direct tangible ways. We're very proud of these outcomes and of the way that we've worked with partners and the broader public to implement the work. From the start, input from our external stakeholders has shaped our implementation, strategy, and ensuring that our execution reflects the desires of the American public. To date, we've collaborated with local partners on more than three hundred and forty projects nationwide, leveraging more than a hundred million of funding beyond the Great American Outdoors Act. To ensure transparency, we've also developed a public phasing dashboard that charts each of these projects uh across the nation and the outcomes of our work. Just here in Arkansas, on the Ouachita National Forest, they received nearly two million dollars in funding to re- rehabilitate a campground loop in the Shady Lake Recreation Area. A civilian concert conservation core site that was developed in the nineteen thirties with infrastructure for camping hiking swimming and picnicking. With LRF funding, we've redesigned the campground layout, replaced roadways and campsites, improved drainage, add utility connections, and repaired a CCC era bathhouse. Construction's complete and the site is once again a local economic driver and valued resource for residents and visitors including scout troops. who visit Shady Lake to earn their merit badges and build leadership and outdoor skills. While the positive impacts of LRF on the agency cannot be overstated, the challenge of deferred maintenance is ongoing. At the Forest Service, an estimated eleven point three billion in deferred maintenance is still outstanding across the entire system. Um, the reauthorization of the Great American Outdoors Act is a lifeline for continuing to address the backlog of deferred maintenance we have It would allocate up to two hundred and eighty-five million dollars a year to the forest, and it would expand the scope of funded activities. This bill would also cap spending uh cap spending on transportation network projects at forty-five percent, which is an increase. Forest service roads and bridges represent more than a seven billion of our deferred maintenance. And this increase would allow additional flexibility to address needed repairs on our highest priority assets and access to the American people. We know that under the twenty-seven bu- President's budget, it does propose the reauthorization of the Great American Outdoors Legacy Restoration Fund and USDA looks forward to continued work with this committee and Congress on reauthorizing this important legislation. Thank you for the opportunity for being here today to testify. I look forward to taking any questions that you have. Thank you.

32:14 – 32:27

Thank you, Associate Chief French. I'll now recognize the Honorable Kate McGregor. Deputy Secretary of the US Department of the Interior. Uh, this is not her first time to Hot Springs either. Welcome back. Deputy Secretary McGregor, recognized for five minutes.

32:29 – 36:58

Good morning. Thank you, Chairman Westerman and Ranking Member Hoffman, for inviting the department to beautiful and historic Hot Springs yet again, for a field hearing on reauthorizing the most game-changing investment into our nation's public lands in a lifetime, the Great American Outdoors Act, which was signed into law by President Trump in twenty twenty. As a former committee staffer, I know all about the effort it takes to bring hearings like this on the road, so I also would like to thank all of the staff who worked so hard to make this hearing today possible. Although we have a lot more people here today, I wonder why. This is my second tour serving as Deputy Secretary in the Trump Administration, and I've had the distinct honor of now working for three secretaries of the interior to help get this legislation legislation across the finish line. I think it's important to remind the general public what public this historic bill did. It created the Legacy Restoration Fund, which allocates funding generated by the Department of the Interior from oil, gas, coal and other mineral development, and it reinvests a portion of those dollars to address deferred maintenance in the American people's assets. Old visitor centers, seawalls, water treatment facilities, bathrooms. It does this without touching the revenue-sharing disbursements that go to energy-producing states like Wyoming and Louisiana. which we know are very important. It's interesting returning to the department over six years from when President Trump first signed this bill and Secretary Bernhardt put together the first secretary's order creating the organization to smartly move those dollars out the door six years later we have deferred maintenance bill that it's significantly grown and only fourteen percent of all the funds have been spent on actual closed or completed projects the average time frame for a project is over four years And even that figure may not truly reflect the time it takes to move these important dollars out the door and into your districts. This is why the Department of the Interior believes that any reauthorization must include meaningful reforms that help us smartly deploy capital faster for the benefit, enjoyment, and the accessibility of the American people. What you need to know is deferred maintenance maintenance has grown because this historic funding mechanism has completely changed the way the Park Service, BLM, Fish and Wildlife and BIA steward the people's assets. Rather than saying, " Hey, we're good. We can put in more window units and some ceiling fans to address a decades-old HVAC system that's held together with duct tape and prayers." And instead say, " Yes, this needs to be addressed properly. Put it on the list." Two, we need projects to flow faster, and we believe that we can do this by working with state and local governments who do this work every day in their unique landscapes. as well as organizations willing to put forward matching dollars. Three, we understand that while many groups may find this type of funding attractive, deferred maintenance must remain the absolute focus. And four, we are absolutely here to constructively work with both the House and the Senate to align on what will be the final version of this landmark reauthorization. Before President Trump's Great American Outdoors Act, the National Park Service could only afford one big project every one to three years. subject to appropriations. Our largest Great American Outdoor project to date is the full replacement of the El Portal water treatment plant in California. It would never have been feasible without GOA. It was first identified as a massive need in twenty twelve, but it was built in the nineteen seventies. And for years the park wrestled with how to cobble together the different funds needed to address it in different phases. Today, the full project is underway, and it's an example of how these monies will put Yosemite Valley, and all of our treasured public spaces on safer and stronger footing. We believe small but common sense refinements to this reauthorization will ensure that the LRF functions as Congress and Interior originally envisioned it, that these energy revenues flow faster to rebuild our aging infrastructure for the benefit and enjoyment of your constituents, the American people, especially as we celebrate our nation's two hundred and fiftieth birthday. The American people treasure their public lands, parks, battlefields, fields and especially our beautiful memorials. Interior is so proud to bear the duty to make sure they're safe, well-maintained and beautiful. We are so grateful for your help today in ensuring that we honor our nation's treasured public lands together. Thank you.

37:01 – 37:30

Thank you, Deputy Secretary McGregor, and and for the work you do at Interior, and I'm glad you mentioned that you used to be a staffer on the House Natural Resources Committee. Good, good training grounds. Uh, I now uh recognize Mr. Kevin Costner, an actor and director with deep ties to Hot Springs and our national parks across the country, a true uh spokesperson for those parks, and we're pleased to have you here today. Mr. Costner, you're recognized.

37:33 – 37:34

Yeah.

37:34 – 52:56

This this reminds me of a high school a little bit. Um, I uh m- maybe I should explain that. Um, having two really smart women to my left and right, I would have never graduated without them. Um, all the men and women up here, um, who are talking on behalf of us. Um, my presence here is I'd like to talk for us. I'd like to think that my experiences are similar to everyone that's out in the audience and maybe You know, that explains a few things besides how difficult it was to find this place on one single road. And get the tie right, my God. Um, members of Congress, Cha- and by the way, Chairman Westerman said this clock doesn't apply to me, so don't have it beep. Members of Congress, uh, Chairman Westerman, uh, Members of the Hot Springs community, thank you for opportunity to testify before you today. I didn't do anything wrong. Um, honest to God. My name is Kevin Costner. I have spent much of my life telling stories about the American landscape, uh, our wildlife, the people who understood in some mythical way that this would become a mission in our life like many of the people on this stage a passion worth protecting. My involvement in conservation has largely come through my work as a filmmaker. My goal has remained the same, to simply help people understand the history, value and importance of preserving our natural landscapes. My introduction to the environment came early as a result of my family's economic status. We didn't have a lot and we didn't have much time. the one week vacation was it for us. It was something I looked forward to my entire year. We didn't have the money to fly to Paris or to s- trip to New York to see the Statue of Liberty, the Empire State Building, or the Brooklyn Bridge. But we could afford the gas to get us to the mighty Sequoias, the High Sierras, to Yosemite, It was better than Paris, at least for a kid with my imagination. We could fish in a lake, sleep n- in a tent next to a stream, wake up to the smell of bacon and open fire, it seemed wild. Never mind that there were other tents and people sharing the same area. It was always worth the wait. But what always struck me, but I couldn't articulate as a child, was that it never changed. It was undisturbed. It was comforting to know when I came back it would look the same every time. It was perfect. But why was it so perfect? Nature doesn't need a lot of help being perfect. But getting to this spot would have been impossible without a road, a marked trail. perfect distance from the next camper. So how did that happen? And then it hit me. It was created by people I would never meet, people I would never be able to thank for taking the time, the effort to make it so perfect for me. Something so simple as a road, a trail, as thoughtful as a rail, that would keep me from out of danger as a child. that would lead to a lifetime of memories. Now I'm now I'm saying it to the men and women of the n- national parks. My God, thank you. Sometimes we think we know the story, but do we really? Do we know the struggle, what it really took? Perhaps we think of Teddy Roosevelt and the mythical relationship he had with John Muir. and their connection to Yosemite. But do we really know the forces that stood in their way? Do we know that these same great men, so celebrated in history, stood on the shoulders of a young boy named Ferdinand Hayden, who lost his father at the age of nine in eighteen thirty eight. His mother would abandon him and he went to work for his uncle. It couldn't have been easy. But at the ripe age of sixteen, he left and he would teach school. Two years later, this same young man would walk three hundred miles to Oberlin College in southern Ohio, and without introduction walked into the president's office and told him straight up that he didn't have any money. But if he allowed him to enroll, that he would do something special one day. In eighteen seventy-one, our country was struggling. It was rapidly expanding and still trying to recover from that terrible civil war. Our economy was in trouble. In response, an expedition was formed to go into an area that had only been seen by one white man. His description of it, however, was at best a rumor, so wild and so unbelievable that no one really took him seriously. They thought of him as perhaps a drunk. But like any good rumor, it would eventually make its way back to Washington. And out of it, an expedition was formed. The mission would be two-fold. One would be to look for gold and silver and any other minerals that could benefit the country. The second would be to find a train route that would connect St. Louis to San Francisco. It would be led by Ferdinand Hayden, the boy who couldn't afford to go to college, who is now man. It would be funded not only by the government, but also the most wealthy and powerful interests of the time, all eager to exploit its resources if they did exist. But what would happen during the course of that exploration would be so profound, so unexpected, that it would cause a shift in our country and eventually the world. and how we would value the land. There was little doubt that these resources were there and would be found. But what Ferdinand Hayden would see was not gold or silver or even a route to San Francisco. What stood out was the majestic waterfalls, the gli- the geysers blowing hot steam hundreds of feet into the air, pools of colored water. What the thirty-two members of this expedition were experience- were were experiencing was not just the rantings of a crazy man. What they were all seeing was Yellowstone. And slowly but surely, Ferdinand Hayden began to feel a shift in his own life, his own mission. And against all odds, Hayden would report back to a Congress that was violently divided, with little ability to agree on anything, and that, yes, there was good news. All the minerals were there, and the route to San Francisco could be built. All the things that he was charged to find were there. But after a deep breath, standing before him, They also, he also told them the truth. The single man standing without benefit of a single lobbyist, telling him that what he had seen could not be matched anywhere else in the world, and that it should be spared, left untouched for everyone to see, now and forever. The room was stunned. But that bill would somehow magically pass that day in a house that couldn't agree on anything. Ulysses S. Grant would sign it into law. And America would have its first national park. A country divided came together that day for a higher good. a testament to the boy who said he would do something special if given a chance to go to college. The odds of that happening in the area and the era lived and the forces that stood against it at a time when America's natural resources were up for grabs, free to be exploited, with little or no regard, for the future. It was zero. But he did it. He had a vision and the courage to champion preservation over profit. We have that chance today. Thank God for these people that would put it forth. We have that chance today. And nature, nature doesn't ask much from us. But think about what it does for us, our souls. But nature sits in silence. It's beautiful. It's awe-inspiring. And it's also vulnerable to our worst instincts. It's a patient that can't speak for itself. That's who we have to be. That's why we're here today. It's our opportunity. We have to stand up for it. And it's not enough to draw lines on a map. and call a pace a place protected. It requires real stewardship. Millions of Americans visit our national parks every year. Families travel across the country to experience experience these landscapes. Veterans. Veterans find peace on these trails. Children see wildlife in its natural habitat for the first time. Visitors from around the world come to witness what America has chosen to preserve. And yet while visitations continue to grow, many of our parks are struggling with aging roads, deteriorating trails, outdated water systems, historic buildings in need of repair, and staffing shortages that make it increasingly difficult to protect these resources and serve the public. We need the people who care for these places. We need the rangers who educate visitors, protect wildlife, maintain those trails, respond to emergencies, and preserve the stories these parks tell. If anything, the demands of our parks today demand more support, not less. Our nation does approach the two hundred fiftieth anniversary. And there's really no better time for us to reaffirm our commitment to these places that tell America's story. Conservation can't afford to b- t- it just can't afford to be a partisan issue. If it wasn't that day that Ferdinand I don't even know what I write sometimes, I just make it up. You know, when so much is at stake, it it becomes an American responsibility. It's our legacy and our solemn promise to the people and generations we will never meet. The Great Americans Outdoor Act represents one of the most important conservation achievements in recent history, because it recognizes that protecting our public lands requires more than good intentions. It requires action. This act will help address decades of deferred maintenance through our national park system. But the work is not finished, the needs remain substantial, the responsibility is ours. So as we think about the future of our national parks and the public lands, We should also recognize that conservation and public access are strengthened when the public and private sectors work together. And when thoughtfully structured, these partnerships can help deliver world-class opportunities and create new experiences that will s- res- inspire people to return again and again. Hot Springs National Park sits at the intersection of conservation, recreation, history and community. It shows how local communities, park leaders, non-profit organizations and private partners can work together to enhance public access while preserving the character and integrity of the resource itself. That's why I'm here today to urge Congress to reauthorize the Great American Outdoors Act, We have to live up to the vision that was created. So as we celebrate our two hundred and fiftieth anniversary, our na- of our nation, I think it's important for us to honor the foresight of those people who protected these places before us, by ensuring they remain protected for generations to come. That responsibility belongs to all of us. I believe we can all become Ferdinand Hayden. Thank you.

52:59 – 53:04

Thank you, Mister Costner, your your remarks were so captivating, I I forgot to look at the clock.

53:05 – 53:06

What did he say?

53:11 – 53:19

Thank you for sparing me, honestly. Really, I pr- I appreciate that. I I don't know how to make a point, I just know how to tell a story.

53:20 – 53:29

Thank you, thank you for telling the story. We now uh go to our next witness and it's my pleasure to introduce Catherine Andrews,

53:24 – 53:25

Thank you.

53:29 – 53:36

the Director of the Office of Outdoor Recreation at the Arkansas Department of Parks, Heritage and Tourism. Miss Andrews, you're recognized.

53:37 – 58:34

Thank you. It's not fair to have to follow that, but I'll do my best. Good morning, Chairman Westerman, Ranking Member Pathmen and members of the committee, thank you for inviting me to be here with you today. My name is Catherine Andrews and I'm Director of Arkansas's Office of Outdoor Recreation within the Department of Parks, Heritage and Tourism. It's an honor to appear before this committee in support of the Great American Outdoors Act and particularly before Chairman Westerman, a fellow Arkansan and steadfast champion for our public lands, outdoor recreation opportunities and the natural state. From the towering bluffs of the Buffalo National River, To the rugged peaks of the Ouachita Mountains, from the Cypress-lined waters of the Delta, to the hills and streams of the Ozarks, Arkansas offers some of the most diverse outdoor recreation opportunities in America. We are home to the mountain biking capital of the world, the duck hunting capital of the world, and the trout capital of the United States. We have the start of the world's longest bayou, the highest waterfall between the Rockies and the Appalachians, and the nation's first national river, the Buffalo. Arkansas is al- also the only state where you can naturally hunt both an elk and an alligator in the same state. These places are more than just destinations. They are part of who we are, our culture, our legacy. Outdoor recreation is one of Arkansas's greatest strengths. It supports jobs, drives tourism, attracts businesses and workforce talent, improves public health, and creates opportunities for all of our communities. Visitors and residents alike are drawn to places where they can spend time outdoors and those experiences create real economic impact. In twenty twenty four alone, visitors to Arkansas's National Park Service sites generated more than three hundred and one million dollars in economic activity for local communities, and that impact is felt right here in Hot Springs. Those visitors supported local restaurants, outfitters, lodging providers, retailers and countless other small businesses that depend on strong outdoor recreation assets. Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders has made outdoor recreation a priority for Arkansas and has challenged us to think bigger about how our natural assets can drive economic growth improve quality of life and strengthen communities across our state. One of the central ideas behind that effort is simple. Outdoor recreation is an industry, and like every industry, it depends on infrastructure. We often think of infrastructure as highways, bridges, utilities, and industrial sites. For the outdoor recreation industry, infrastructure looks different. It's trails, campgrounds, boat launches, visitor facilities, and public lands. Without places to recreate, there is no outdoor recreation economy. Recreation access and public lands are infrastructure for the outdoor recreation industry. They are the foundation upon which the outdoor economy is built. In Arkansas, we've seen firsthand that access drives participation. Participation drives economic activity and economic activity supports jobs businesses and communities. Through the Great American Outdoors Act nearly thirty-eight million dollars has been invested in projects across Arkansas, helping improve almost a hundred and fifty public land assets throughout the state. As of March twenty twenty five, these investments have supported projects at Hot Springs National Park, the Buffalo National River, and Dale Bumpers White River National Wildlife Refuge. one of the most important waterfowl habitats in North America. These investments are not simply about repairing buildings or roads. They're investments in family fishing trips. They're investments in duck hunters, hikers, paddlers, campers, birdwatchers, and outdoor enthusiasts. They are investments in gateway communities and rural economies. And most importantly, they're investments that ensure that future generations can enjoy the same outdoor experiences that have shaped so many of us. As Director of Arkansas's Office of Outdoor Recreation, I often say that our office serves two groups. First, we serve our outdoor recreation industry partners, manufacturers, outfitters, guides, retailers, hospitality businesses and entrepreneurs. We help them grow, create jobs and overcome barriers to success. Second, we serve our communities, cities, counties and non-profit partners that are working to leverage outdoor recreation as a tool for economic development and quality of life. The Great American Outdoors Act supports both. In Arkansas, we have set an ambitious goal of doubling our outdoor recreation economy, and achieving that goal will require continued investment in our outdoor recreation assets. This year, as our nation celebrates America's two hundred and fiftieth anniversary, we have an opportunity to reflect not only on our history but our responsibility. On behalf of the Arkansas Office of Outdoor Recreation and the Department of Parks, Heritage and Tourism, thank you for your commitment to America's lands and our outdoor recreation opportunities. Thank you for you. Thank you for the opportunity to testify today, and I look forward to answering your questions.

58:35 – 58:57

Thank you, Miss Andrews, and thank you for the great work you're doing to kind of get you to, yeah, thank you. Uh, with the outdoor recreation here in the state, it is uh, it's amazing how fast that's growing here. And I recognize Mister Mike Ward, an executive council member of the Coalition to Protect America's National Parks. Mister Ward, you're recognized.

58:58 – 1:04:41

Chairman Westerman, Ranking Member Huffman, and members of the committee, thank you for the opportunity to be with you today, uh, to testify at this important hearing. My name is Mike Ward and I am testifying on behalf of the Coalition to Protect America's National Park, that's, uh, made up of over five thousand members, all of whom are current, former or retired employees and volunteers of the National Park Service. Our goal is to continue continue to supporting the National Park Service mission and National Park Service employees for national park solutions, find advocating for national park solutions based on law and sound science. I spent nearly four decades working for the National Park Service in many roles, including Deputy Regional Director in the Midwest Region, uh, Superintendent of Ulysses S. Grant National Historic Site, uh Superintendent of Voyagers National Park on the boundary of Canada and Superintendent of Gateway Arch National Park where I was uh privileged to complete uh probably one of the largest public-private partnerships in the history of the National Park Service at over three hundred and eighty million dollars worth of work on the national at the National Park site. I'm honored to testify in strong support of the reauthorization of the Great American Outdoors Act a critical investment in the long-term health of the American America's public lands and specifically on the draft legislation titled the Great American Outdoors Act two fifty. America's national parks are often called crown jewels, places of inspiration, recreation and reflection. They are more than scenic landscapes and a collection of historic sites. They are physical embodiment of our shared history, culture and natural heritage. While that legacy has been at risk due to decades of underinvestment in infrastructure, over the last five years it is a clear, it is clear that projects funded through GOAS LRF are making a difference. Hundreds of park units are benefiting from this fund. We're grateful to Congress for passing the law, and I'm here to tell you today that it's critical to extend it in order to bring more park assets into good condition. The LRF has been called a game-changer for good reasons. For the first time in decades, NPS has the access to consistent, dedicated funding to tackle the backlog in a strategic, comprehensive way. In just five years, the LRF has funded hundreds of projects across the country. It is clearly working. It has helped NPS and other public land agencies turn the tide on decades of deferred maintenance. Reauthorizing it will help ensure the future generations can enjoy safe, accessible and inspiring public lands. And of course, all you need to do is look out the windows uh down the street to see the success of the LRF in progress here at Hot Springs National Park, which preserves a key part of American history. The recent groundbreaking at the Maurice Bass House shows progress by ensuring public access, enhancing safety, and ensuring the preservation of that history. Recently my wife and I visited Hot Springs and learned about the thermal water system here. An extremely complex collection and distribution system for the very resource that inspired the creation of one of our oldest national parks. If I understand it correctly, the system is over a hundred years old. The replacement of a system that complex and and this vital to the community is not a small project. It is a project of the size and magnitude that most likely LRF is the only way it may be accomplished. I would like to move to a concern I have that I feel is important for you to sit to for you all to consider. I've witnessed um in my retirement travel to NPS sites and in my previous work experience I've witnessed the effects of si- the serious decline in staffing at the National Park Service. And I'd like to address this in two ways very quickly. The first is regarding the operation of national park service units and the second is staffing at regional and national service centers that support the parks operationally and directly on project support. From the operational standpoint, I can tell you that my own personal experience is that NPS employees will show up every day and do whatever is necessary to protect the resources in their park, and to serve the visitors as well as they can. This will this, pardon me. This w- they will and have been doing two to three jobs because they simply will not fail. They will not let themselves fail in delivering a strong customer service. While this is valiant in nature, it is not sustainable. From the project perspective, our parks rely heavily on the regional and national service centers to support large construction and rehabilitation projects. Loss of staff in areas related to design, compliance, quality control, contracting and structure management has a direct effect on the capacity to m- for the park to make these projects. Take these projects on. It is clear to me that everyone here today values our national parks, and I believe Americans across the political spectrum do. We must recognize that protecting these places requires investing in the people who make that protection, the operation, and the improvement of these incredible places as possible. Thank you for your leadership. I look forward to questioning.

1:04:42 – 1:05:22

Thank you, Mister Ward. We now move to our our last and certainly not least uh t- witness today, Mister Cole McCaskill, the Interim President. You can turn your microph- you're okay, thank you. The Interim President and CEO of the Greater Hot Springs Chamber of Commerce, Cole has been very instrumental. Um, if you know Hot Springs National Park, if you go down Central Avenue, you got the National Park to the left and you've got the city and businesses to the right, and Cole's done a tremendous job making sure those buildings are filled up with with businesses. Cole, you're recognized for five minutes.

1:05:24 – 1:10:41

Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. Uh, Chairman Westerman, Ranking Member Huffman, committee members, congratulations on the bipartisan nature of the work that we are talking about today. It's extremely important. Uh, my name is Cole McCaskill with the Hot Springs Chamber of Commerce. Uh, welcome to all of our distinguished guests and thank you for being here. On behalf of everyone from Hot Springs, let me tell you how proud we are to have Hot Springs National Park as our front yard and Ouachita National Forest as our backyard. These are world-class public lands. If this is your first trip to Hot Springs, it doesn't take long to figure out that this national park is quite a bit different than most. Uh, the first question most visitors ask is, " Where's the park entrance?" Hot Springs National Park and the city of Hot Springs are intertwined. They grew up together. It's a very symbiotic relationship. I cannot overstate how influential public lands are on the economy of Hot Springs. Let's look just at the National Park for a moment. two and a half million visitors per year. It's the second smallest national park by area, but the fifteenth most visited in the entire system. Two and a half million visitors bring with them a tremendous demand for goods and services. The park provides for a fraction of that demand, but can't provide for the majority. Travelers need lodging, food, shopping, entertainment, transportation, souvenirs. I mean, did you even visit a national park if you didn't get a fridge magnet? The tourist hierarchy of needs are lodging, food, frig ma- fridge magnets, and in and in Hot Springs, water jugs, because our water is very special and it's the reason why we're all here today. The businesses of Hot Springs and the city of Hot Springs and Garland County meet that demand of the millions of visitors. They provide tourism infrastructure. The employees of downtown businesses are front-line ambassadors for the national park. They're the ones that get the question, " Where's the park entrance?" And likewise, uh National Park Rangers are front-line ambassadors for the businesses of Hot Springs when people say, " Hey, where's a good good place to eat around here?" Hot Springs National Park has no parking. Two and a half million visitors a year and no parking. The city provides the parking. I work in economic development. In this industry, we know that investment and job creation is what makes the world go round. We also know that private investment follows public investment, and the Great American Outdoors Act two fifty is policy that promises that public investment. As as Congressman Westerman mentioned, we've had an incredible amount of growth downtown over the last twelve years. Two hundred and sixty businesses have opened to over two hundred and thirty million dollars has been invested just in these ten blocks of downtown Hot Springs creating over twelve hundred new jobs. Much of this growth was to meet the demand brought here by all the visitors to the National Park. Uh, new hotels, new restaurants, new boutique shopping is the majority of what we've seen. It hasn't always been this wonderful. Bathing demand declined in the mid-nineteen hundreds and all but one of the bathhouses closed for decades. And when the shopping mall was built, all commerce moved out to another part of town, and the park and downtown struggled together. Can you imagine all the lights being turned off at bathhouse row and trying to do economic development and recruit businesses down here but thankfully the national park service invested in the park and that public investment spurred private investment and now we have this thriving economy that we're all so proud of today what a novel idea invest in your community and business will follow or in other words as a wise man once said build it and they will come well if if you have a national park they will come Uh, I love national parks, I've visited quite a few, and I've seen this phenomenon, all of them. You drive in usually in the middle of nowhere and you come up on a town of businesses, and you know the park entrance must be close. I'm thinking uh Estes Park, Colorado, Springdale, Utah, Gatlinburg, Tennessee, Hot Springs, Arkansas. Businesses and cities providing the tourism for ins- inf- for providing the infrastructure for tourism. Without it, the visitor experience would be a disaster. Parks can't provide everything that's needed. And Hot Springs hasn't set idle on the tourism of National Park. We've leveraged it. We've added diverse attractions to bring more people to town and give people a longer a reason to stay in town longer. Maybe you came to town for the National Park and you stayed to enjoy thoroughbred horse racing at Oak Lawn Park. Maybe you come for Mid-America Science Museum, uh, and stay for Magic Springs theme park. We've we've grown tourism to a billion dollar industry in Hot Springs on the foundation of the thermal water. We are so proud of our public lands here in Hot Springs, and we're excited about the thirty million dollar restoration going on at the Maurice Bathhouse right now. It's sure to attract more private investment, new businesses and jobs when it's complete. If we maintain our natural assets, they will thrive and the local economies will thrive. If we do the opposite, we will get the opposite result. The bottom line is, if we want economic growth, we have to invest, and we need to grow. because it's a heck of a lot better than the alternative. Thank you.

1:10:43 – 1:11:15

Thank you, Cole, for your testimony and for the the marvelous work that's been going on here in Hot Springs. We will now move to the uh questioning part of our hearing. At this point, uh members will be recognized to question the witnesses for five minutes and I want to we're gonna have to test our coordination. If you're speaking, have your microphone on. If you're not please turn it off because we get a lot of feedback if they're on at the same time. Uh first I'll recognize the gentleman from Oregon, Mister Bentz, you're recognized.

1:11:17 – 1:12:39

Thank you Mister Chair, and and let me let me thank the Chair for setting up this hearing and also for his incredible work in promoting this in in important legislation. I've had the privilege of being on his committee now for, this is my sixth year, and I've been uh uh impressed uh at every meeting with his work ethic and his focus on trying to help uh help a help America in general and and Arkansas in particular, uh you folks are so fortunate to have him as your representative. Uh uh I and I wanna I wanna thank um Mr. Costner for being here. Yeah, his his ability to bring attention to what we need to do to protect uh these things that are so important is incredible and we're very very fortunate to have him here. here today. My questions uh are first for Deputy Secretary McGregor and I know the administration uh for whom you work has uh has indicated that they support the one point nine billion annually for five years that this bill would bring and could you perhaps revisit just for a moment why this amount, although absolutely welcome, is is going to be a small step in the right direction uh of the incredible need that our parks uh and other public uh uh lands uh illustrate.

1:12:40 – 1:13:04

Sure, I think it was also echoed by one of the other um one of the other folks on this uh great panel that the parks for longest time relied upon cobbling together line item construction um and other various forms including for floria dollars, to be able to undertake large projects. Having dedicated large funding streams and the ability to draw from them and know and have certainty that those dollars are

1:13:14 – 1:13:59

It it seemed to me in setting up for this hearing, uh, that the, uh, need right now is around forty billion dollars collectively and that if we're if we're going to go in the right direction, we have to continue the good work that was done during the first, uh, Trump administration and that this reauthorization would do that. Um, one of the things that's of great interest to me is the source of the money that's going to help pay the bills. And and and it's going to come from, as I understand it, uh uh some uh royalty uh uh from oil and gas uh development. And I've always looked, as we mine and as we drill, we are depleting that asset. What is the best way to use at least a portion of that money to offset that which we are using?

1:14:00 – 1:14:44

I think it's to call attention to that. I mean, most of the money, as you saw a couple of weeks ago, we had a record-breaking sale in Carlsbad, New Mexico, where we generated four billion dollars, um, from a relatively low percentage of acreage of the federal estate. And that's the kind of money that not just importantly will be shared with the state of New Mexico and most of it I do believe per state policy flows into the public school system but those dollars separately will go into general receipts. And this allows Interior to have access to those dollars we never have before and reinvest them into the bu- this uh multi-billion dollar backlog as you suggested but it also echos and it underscores the importance of the energy dominance mission which is funding this entire endeavor.

1:14:45 – 1:15:36

And and it's interesting to see that we are taking from the land but we are giving back to it. And so to me that is uh part of the genius of of the bill uh that Cher- Chairman Westrom is bringing to us today. Um my My last question is really of the audience and it's really what are you going to do to help us get this legislation passed and it's not just the audience here it's the audience online that's listening and I would just say that these bills uh are difficult and it's it's uh incumbent upon all of us n- to do our best to reach out uh to s- the senators and others uh that aren't here today and say hey this is important. So but it's not up just to us up here um it's up to you also. So I just wanna say thank you again, uh, Chair Westerman, for this opportunity and, um, well, yeah, th- this is this is a this is a great district. Yeah. Yield back.

1:15:38 – 1:15:45

I might give you more time after those comments. Represent Benis. And now I recognize the gentleman from California, Mister Huffman, you're recognized.

1:15:46 – 1:17:39

Thank you, Mister Chairman. Uh, folks, you you wouldn't know it from the collegiality and the goodwill here on this panel today, but that's not what most hearings of the House Natural Resources Committee look like. We have spent a good part of the last sixteen months uh doing political battle on some very controversial things. And what's so extraordinary about the work that Chairman Westerman is leading and that I am partnering with him on, is we're trying to take this critical funding for our federal public lands, the uh Land and Water Conservation Fund and this Legacy Restoration Fund and we're trying to insulate it. from all of that conflict and controversy so that we can move it through the House and the Senate and on to the President's desk. And uh my job uh as the Democratic partner in this duo is to deliver the Democratic votes to try to make sure we keep it protected and keep it on that strong, bipartisan track. And so Deputy Secretary McGregor, I'm gonna ask your help in that regard. Uh there's a little bit of nervousness about the legacy restoration fund where we are making some technical changes to this fund to broaden, you know, very carefully broaden, uh, the potential uses of it. There is some nervousness among some of my colleagues that some of the fights we've had these last few months over what we would call vanity projects for the president, the east wing ballroom, the two hundred and fifty foot arch, the use of recreation fees for the reflecting pool, and so forth, um, that this funding could somehow be redirected and appropriated toward those ends. Can you help me out here by just giving me an assurance that we're gonna keep this in the box, that this, uh, will be used for the deferred maintenance purposes that are explicitly articulated uh in the legislation?

1:17:40 – 1:17:57

Uh, ranking member, I would not refer to those projects as vanity projects. I would say that they serve as an example to the American people through the use of a Maytalk, which is a multiple award task order contract. of getting efficiency in a process to improve our beautiful

1:17:55 – 1:17:55

Mm-hmm.

1:17:57 – 1:18:22

places for the American people's enjoyment in DC this summer. So if you think about it, twenty-two different fountains, two water bodies, I think the merits of the purpose is that if you wanna ask, done in one year, done in one year. you'll assure me that this will be for deferred maintenance. This will be for however you determine in the law you would like us to spend it, but for the longest time over the past five years, we have used it wisely for deferred maintenance. which some of those fountains are.

1:18:24 – 1:19:04

The next piece of this is the international um visit visitor fund fee. Not a radical concept, lot of other countries do this, uh and the administration is piloting it this year. I assume that you've begun to get some data and some insights into how it's going so far. But uh as I try to deliver these democratic votes to keep this thing on a path for success, there is a little bit of nervousness about the park entrance becoming a a point at which we turn our rangers and park personnel into immigration enforcers. Um, can you give me any assurance that that is not the intent and that that is not where this is heading?

1:19:05 – 1:19:16

I can just say that per Mister Costner's testimony when he said, this is not Paris, the Louvre assesses Americans a higher a higher entrance fee than any other European.

1:19:14 – 1:19:14

Sure.

1:19:17 – 1:19:19

So we simply borrowed that idea from many of the different

1:19:48 – 1:20:48

Alright. Uh, last thing I wanna touch on in in my time is the importance of um the history that is preserved by our natural parks. Um, Mister Costner did a great job talking about these spectacular landscapes and these special places that we've had the foresight to preserve. But many of our parks also uh are historic. Uh, Battlefield, so many other places here in Hot Springs, it's a mixture of course of a really beautiful uh iconic place, but also some really rich history. that is told uh by the National Park Service. We've uh had some controversies in the past year uh about attempts to sort of politically filter some of that history, and uh we are having a bit of a reckoning uh over some of our disagreements in that regard. I hope we can leave the story of America to the historians, to the docents, to the rangers, to the documentary filmmakers uh who are really good at this stuff, and keep the politicians out of it. And with that, Mr. Westerman, I will yield back.

1:20:49 – 1:20:54

Thank you, Ranking Member Huff- Huffman. The chair now recognizes the gentlelady from Wyoming, Miss Hagerman, you're recognized.

1:20:54 – 1:21:38

Thank you, Mister Chair, thank you, Mister Costner, for telling just some of the history of Yellowstone National Park, which is located in my great state of Wyoming. And I am also going to turn to you, Deputy Secretary McGregor, for my questioning as well. This administration has had numerous successes comes to protecting and managing our incredible natural resources, including passage and implementation of the Great American Outdoors Act, and also through investing in our national parks, the BLM, lands, Bureau of Reclamation projects, and others. Could you please describe some of the successes that you believe really highlight the dedication that this administration has p- has uh, demonstrated for uh, protecting our natural resources?

1:21:38 – 1:22:47

Absolutely. I think the historic investment of President Trump's Great American Outdoors Act has proven to be beneficial across this great nation in so many different ways. And that bill ultimately was signed into law by him. Ultimately, we are also using floria dollars to make DC safe and beautiful. And one of the more recent ones where I had the opportunity to attend the ribbon-cutting with Secretary Burgum, we saw Columbus Circle Fountain, which was built in nineteen twelve on dirt. The foundation, when they pulled the marble up, was dirt. Um, so that contractor had to painstakingly remove every piece of marble and put it back perfectly and get that fountain if you think about it a fountain built in nineteen twelve how many permits did that go through probably not a lot um and get that in good working order and it had not been running in fifteen years which of course is harder to get back in working and if you look at the t that today, is a good example. It's now on a firm, newly poured strong foundation for the benefit of everyone who steps off the train station and walks towards the House and Senate. And if you drive by it, I hope you do.

1:22:45 – 1:22:45

Uh

1:22:47 – 1:22:50

Um, I hope you see that is what we wanna do everywhere.

1:22:50 – 1:23:06

It it is very beautiful. I was there just two days ago. The first five years of the Legacy Restoration Fund, under the original Great American Outdoors Act, delivered substantial progress on deferred maintenance across the national forest system. Can you share some lessons learned from that process?

1:23:07 – 1:24:08

Yeah, I think um we have different gating criteria where parks, BLM, Fish and Wildlife Service and BIA all individually make an assessment on what gets sent up but then it can get stuck in the region and then it can go up to DC and get stuck again and then go to a different person in a different office and say, is this really a good investment, and then we move forward. Then you move into construction and um and design and construction, which you'd want to take, you know, a year maybe less and it doesn't always do that. And then it just moves through so much process and we just hit a wall with getting these dollars out and that's why you see a project four years or longer. So that is why we're asking for provisions that look like can we work with our state and local partners our gateway communities um sort of what we were hearing from the chamber of commerce to move faster because they understand their local environment better and often have a good line towards who are the best folks doing this kind of work on a road, on toilets, et cetera?

1:24:09 – 1:24:22

Well, and Associate uh Chief French, I'm going to ask you the same question. What are some of the lessons that we have learned in terms of attempting to get this money to the projects that need to be constructed or uh implemented?

1:24:23 – 1:25:07

Uh, thank you, Congresswoman. I think for us, what we one of the central things we learned was ask people what they want. And so for us, we focused on smaller projects across the entire system. You know, it it is walking into a campground and not having water and people saying, just fix this. Um, we focused on those sorts of things, working with counties, working with others to say what are those those key things. I completely agree that our ability to move things faster, reforms in our purchasing and our our acquisition processes are really important to get these things done. I also think it's important to get all the permitting done before you start a project and before you commit money to make it go faster.

1:25:07 – 1:26:14

One of the things that I think that we need to do, and I I I've learned this in in a t- in both in private practice before I came to Congress as well as the the work that we've done on the Natural Resources Committee. But part of the challenge we have with permitting is that it seems that so much of the work is done consecutively rather than concurrently. And what I would like to see both at the state and federal level and that state federal and local partnership between the federal agencies and the state agencies, and even more local agencies, but also within the various agencies themselves. We need to figure out how we can be moving projects forward with the various agencies, the various touchpoints, being able to move move concurrently so that it doesn't take that amount of time for the permitting. So I'm excited about some of the permitting reform that we're doing because I think it is going to help to us to provide the kind of experience, Mister Coster, that you had as a child. and that you continue to enjoy as an adult and that you recognize is so important in terms of our legacy as well as uh the future of the United States and our recreating community. So thank you for your testimony, thank you all for being here and thank you for the work that you do. I yield back.

1:26:16 – 1:26:23

Thank you Rep- Representative Hagerman. The chair now recognizes the representative from New Mexico, Miss Ledger Fernandez, you're recognized.

1:26:24 – 1:28:59

Thank you, chair, and thank you to everybody. And I need to say it's really appropriate that we have one of the country's best and greatest storytellers with us here today because America has been on a hero's journey to create a more perfect union. America's journey, like all riveting stories, has been difficult, it's been blood-stained, there've been moments of great loss, but also moments of glory and inspiration. And one of those visionary and inspirational chapters in our story was the creation of the national parks, a recognition that we must protect not only the beauty, but the history that is America. But as Mister Costner noted, uh I loved it when you said nature doesn't help need help being perfect. But we all know that a park cannot take care of itself without funding and people. The thermal springs need plumbing, maintenance in roads and trails is true for almost every single park we have. And the great American Outdoors Act was key to the survival of the national park system. But today, we're writing the next and essential chapter of our story as we reauthorize that essential bipartisan achievement. Cuz every community in America has jewels like Bathhouse Row. In my district, the Legacy Restoration Fund is helping replace water systems at Bandelier National Monument and rebuild campgrounds in the Rio Grande del Norte, National Monument. In contrast, Chaco Canyon has a long list, about twenty-four million dollars of deferred maintenance. It needs the Legacy Restoration Fund to be continue and to be used for deferred maintenance, which is where this fund is supposed to go, deferred maintenance at our park. We need it. But funding alone will not maintain and restore these sites. We also need the people. And we heard earlier in the testimony that the National Park Service has lost one in four of the permanent staff. Um, Deputy Secretary McGregor, uh, can you commit to us that the National Park Service will restore permanent positions so that we can actually carry out all of the important work that we're discussing today.

1:29:00 – 1:29:32

Thank you for this opportunity to talk about the authority you recently gave us which is local hire authority. We are hiring in the Park Service and making sure that those positions are filled, especially in the field so that um the parks have everyone they need. And the most important thing I want to say is that local hire authority We've used it already for over a hundred people. It allows us to hire from the local communities. And those are often the people who are are most passionate about the lands they wanna talk about and share the stories with all of our visitors.

1:29:34 – 1:30:01

Uh, well, I didn't get my mike off, but now I'm just asking a question. Uh, Mister Ward, if you could quickly um d- Are you concerned about hiring? And I also would point out in your testimony that we need to make sure we keep funding construction projects and not rely solely on the largest project, I think there was a cut of almost uh fifty percent for construction projects. But are you concerned about, Will, uh the fact that we've lost so many people, if you can just say yes or no?

1:30:01 – 1:30:29

I am and I and I am uh concerned in two ways as I tried to express in my testimony. The uh the first way is just the operation of the parks themselves. They don't have the capacity to do large projects like this. They have always relied on the regions and the service centers. to provide that capacity to them. The regions and the service centers are uh, you know, the professionals, the architects, the engineers, the landscape architects, that that parks don't have those positions at all.

1:30:29 – 1:30:49

Right. Thank thank you so very much, and Mister Costner, uh thank you for very much for pointing out that we need both the people and the infrastructure. And is it true that we need to keep this alive, to keep telling our American story? Uh through the parks. Why is it important that we have both the funding and the people?

1:30:54 – 1:33:14

I play rock and roll, so sometimes I don't hear everything. The um, the um, it's it's it it's just an obvious thing. You know, there are things that that have to be protected and it just seems, it just seems obvious. I don't, I don't come here even on my own, just as someone who's pointing out things that we almost all intuitively know what we have to do. And, you know, and it's not just our life. It's a extension of things. It also speaks well of a people who know what to save and what prot- to protect. It - it - it should - it should help define us, how we deal with this specific thing we're talking about. Um, but I - I'm here today as someone who ev- a- as a - as a - a person who comes as business um uh to to to create opportunities in in hot springs that have either faded away, or have never been here. The hot water is exclusively in the purview right now of of of of the bathhouses, which is incredible, and those Art Deco buildings are are incredible, but what's been missing in hot springs for a hundred and fifty years is the ability of people to actually see it in its natural state. So I come as a, try to come as a problem solver as a as a businessman, and you see the opportunities do exist here. Um, and, and I explore them in that way. And, and certainly that is why I'm here in Hot Springs. I've kind of fallen in love with it. It's kind of hard not to. It's just, it's one street. You don't get that lost. It's pretty great. But the history is extraordinary. And things have fallen into disrepair. And there's these beautiful mountains on either side of this street. But they're hard to get into. And I think that from a b- a business standpoint, developing here, the idea of helping to create access is what I'm, uh, is why I'm here as well. It's just, I think, in common with everyone in the room is Yes, we have to protect. It is a no brain situation. It may cause us a little pain. Really? The pain is in not doing what's right.

1:33:15 – 1:33:35

Thank you very much and uh uh, Mister Chairman, before I yield back, I just wanna recognize that the uh the the wonderful uh youth we see out here in the maroon shirts are from the Arkansas Conservation Corps, and they work on many of our legacy restoration projects, so thank you so very much for being here. And with that, I yield back.

1:33:36 – 1:33:41

Young lady yields back. The chair now recognizes the gentleman from Colorado. Mister Crank, you're recognized.

1:33:42 – 1:34:30

Thank you, Mister Chairman, and thanks to your great community for their hospitality. Been been wonderful to be here. And I'm very pleased to support the bipartisan, uh, Great American Outdoors Act of, uh, two fifty to reauthorize the legacy restoration fund. And, you know, when the Great American Outdoors Act was signed in a law, deferred maintenance in the Department of Interior was twenty-two billion dollars. That's doubled in five years to about forty billion dollars. And that's evidence that Interior needs more tools to tackle the backlog. And so, um, I would ask, uh, Secretary McGregor, what extent does project planning and environmental review, uh, procurement requirements affect the speed at which maintenance projects can move forward uh from concept to conservation?

1:34:28 – 1:34:29

All Sorry.

1:34:30 – 1:34:30

Yeah, sorry.

1:34:30 – 1:35:54

Sorry, sorry, all of it. all of it does and I think um I like to use El Portal in California as a quick example um with no offense to ranking member Hoffman, California is not known to being a quick permitting state. There it has some of its unique uh own state laws such as CSA and CEQA that you have to go through as well as ESA, NEPA, NHPA, working with your state SHPO office for historic preservation. But El Portal, which is I think now at two hundred and thirty million dollars, the largest project they were were solving for a wastewater facility, it was done under a categorical exclusion. It might be the only Cad-X in the history of our country for a wastewater treatment plant. But if you think about it, it's built on the same footprint. It's serving the same purpose. It's impacting the same waters. Um, it has that the landscape has potentially changed, but it's still providing that same service but better. And I think that we need to be sensible about looking at a lot of these projects. When you talk about hot springs, I imagine looking at that bath house or any other facility that is on the same footprint. It would be nice to have a way to go faster, knowing that it's still on that same footprint. And the environmental analysis, um, in many cases has been done time over time on these footprints over and over again.

1:35:54 – 1:36:06

So, the, talking about the Cat- uh, Cat-X or category Considering the bulk of the maintenance backlog in the is in the park service, how could the authority help them with the deferred maintenance prob problem?

1:36:06 – 1:37:02

I think um that and many other provisions, it's ultimately up to you and where you all land on your final legislation. I'll just say that we do run into issues we can get through NEPA, but oftentimes we'll run into NHPA issues or a local SHPO. And and ultimately everyone loves these different park structures, BLM structures, forest service structures, and they have a vision for what they'd like to see for that structure. Sometimes we have discussions on should we rebuild them so that they're more fire-ready because we have a wildland urban interface issue and we need to protect these sites from fire and that's where it can get into a little bit of debate on what kind of shingle are we using so I think giving us authorities to responsibly use it and remember it's not us it's going to be superintendents who can make use of those authorities to build back in a stronger, more durable way, but faster.

1:37:03 – 1:37:20

And let me ask you about that. This uh this bill has a revenue uh retention, a revenue retention framework in the bill. Does it give the parks that have uh, you know, higher uh visitors, visitor use, does it give them the ability to kind of deal with some of this maintenance issue?

1:37:20 – 1:37:58

Yeah, and revenue retention always helps, it especially helps those larger parks who have greater visitorship. Um, I think about Floria and the top ten parks that receive the eighty percent of retained revenue and reinvest those. Um, but, you know, the great leveling factor about the Great Amer- American Outdoors Act is finding a way to get these dollars. Well, they'll make a difference in some of the smaller parks that are equally as precious to the people who get to enjoy them, whether it's, um, Valley Forge National Park, uh, where I grew up playing on cannons, or some of the other smaller parcels that might not always get that retention, because they don't have as much visitorship.

1:37:58 – 1:38:08

Yeah. Uh, Chief French, just I'm almost out of time, but wanted to ask you about uh how this, the deferred maintenance that we currently have um limits access for sportsmen.

1:38:10 – 1:38:43

Great question. Uh, hear it all the time. If, you know, for our sportsmen, what do they, what do they need? They need roads that can get them into the places where they wanna hunt and fish. They need boat ramps. they need facilities to park. And as soon as those sorts of things are no longer available, we just hear about it. The other thing is we're starting to see over time, uh, historic access that used to go to public lands, um, being being changed. And so we work with partners to ensure that long-term access to public lands continue.

1:38:44 – 1:38:46

Thank you, Mister Chairman, I yield back. Thank you.

1:38:47 – 1:38:51

Chairman yields back. Chair now recognizes the General Lady from Oregon, Miss Hoyle, you're recognized.

1:38:51 – 1:41:03

Oh. Thank you, Chair Westerman. First, I I wanna thank you and your staff and the community of Hot Springs for your hospitality. Um, this is truly a special place. I represent the Central and South Coast of Oregon, so I know special places, and this is one. Um, budgets are a reflection of our values and priorities, and when we do it right, they are the values of our constituents. And I am certain that being good that's doing it right. And uh that means investing in our federal workforce, in the people who work so hard to keep our petal public lands accessible, and to provide the upkeep to the infrastructure that allow millions of visitors to get around our park safely and to enjoy the tremendous splendor of this great country. In Oregon alone, over a hundred and fifty million dollars in the Great American Outdoors Act funding has supported twenty-five projects. I invite you all to come to Oregon to see those projects. Um, we have no sales tax, so you should bring your wallets. Um, we still have significant deferred maintenance needs that we have a responsibility to address in our national parks, which is why I'm so heartened to be here with this bipartisan group of legislators, committing to, committed to getting the great American outdoor two-fifty act across the finish line. Our public lands are a treasure, and investing in keeping these lands public and accessible is something that political people across the political spectrum agree that we should protect and ensure that they're available and accessible for the next generations. Um, my first question is to Deputy Chief French. Uh, many of the communities I represent are located right next to federal lands and recreation sites. Given the increasing frequency and severity of wildfires with, uh, climate change and extreme drought in my district and across the West, could you share how the agency takes wildfire emergency response and or evacuation access into consideration when identifying priority deferred maintenance projects?

1:41:05 – 1:42:06

Uh, great question. Um, there's a couple things you wanna think about is is you wanna ensure that the folks that are using your national forest, they're safe. There's only, there's so many, so many things that we can control, but one of the things we control is their egress, the roads they're on, that they're passable, that they can carry the volume of visitors that we have in those places. And so when we think about the, the work that we need to do to bring things up to standard, we are always considering wildland fire danger in those areas to ensure that the design and the the prioritization of those things is addressing that. Um, we don't always get it right, but it's certainly a consideration. I would also say that, you know, one of the things we know is that if you do have a a catastrophic or high severity wildfire that hits one of these areas, people don't use it anymore in the same way they did. And it's as important to be doing those up front fuel treatments to ensure the safety of people going into those areas, because the majority of fires we get are human related.

1:42:07 – 1:42:36

Thank you, I agree a hundred percent. And that's where um Job Corps and our federal workforce are absolutely critical in making sure there's less to burn. Um, Mister Costner, question for you. So, I have the honor of representing four of um Oregon's nine federally recognized tribes and the citizens of many other tribes. So one of my top priorities in Congress is working with um our tribal nations on increasing co-management opportunities and

1:43:03 – 1:44:41

Um, I think we, uh, as human beings, we, we move towards the things that interest us. Sometimes we move towards the things that interest us that we know nothing about. And when we choose to do a deeper dive and understand something deeper, uh, our appetite for it grows. So when I, when you're a child growing up in public school, you're, you're, uh, you're taught one thing about the country, but the deeper dive doesn't always exist, that that there was a uh a whole world that was here before us. Um it didn't start in uh you know seventeen seventy six and it didn't start in fourteen ninety two. Um and I'm thrilled with history so I'm I just gravitate towards it. I'm not the only one. I think we can all but when they're be presented in a real way they become more exciting. When they be are treated in a real way they can become more horrific. that can be equally il- illuminating to us about how we behave going forward. And we look back and we understand it's very difficult to pass judgment on people who lived in another century how they did it. But it's incredibly easy to see what was right and what was wrong about it. Um, I'm, I'm thrilled with our history. I like to, uh, uh, deal with it. I wasn't good in math. um, wasn't good in a lot of things. But I, I love what has come before us and how we choose to leave it afterwards.

1:44:43 – 1:44:44

Thank you, I yield back.

1:44:46 – 1:44:51

Young lady yields back. The chair recognizes the young lady from Oregon. This is Dexter for five minutes.

1:44:51 – 1:46:42

Thank you, Mister Chair, and thank you so much for your hospitality and the work of your team to bring us all here today and for our witnesses making the trip. some longer than others, obviously. And, Mister Costner, I'm sure I'm not alone when you were telling your story of your family camping trips. I felt like you were telling my family's story. Um, this is a bipartisan American effort. First, I'm very supportive of reauthorizing the Legacy Restoration Fund. Oregon residents have benefited enormously from this program, and I wanna see that work continue. Last August, I set out with my team to hike the Timberline Trail. the iconic forty mile route that circumnavigates Mount Hood, the pointy mountain in Oregon that you hopefully know. Along the way, I took time to hear directly from hikers, the forest service tribal leaders, trail volunteers and local stakeholders about the real world impact of the Great American Outdoor Act, and programs like the Legacy F- Restoration Fund on our communities. What I heard reinforced why this bipartisan legislation matters. Iconic projects like the Trillium Lake Boardwalk, which has already received legacy restoration fund dollars, are visible proof of what this program delivers. But there is so much as we have heard to be done, and the communities surrounding Mount Hood are counting on reauthorization of this work. Those benefits have real measurable value. In twenty twenty four, Oregon's recreational sites generated one hundred and thirty-one million dollars in economic output. including through visitor visitor spending at hotels, restaurants or ski areas, small businesses and some in our gateway communities. Mister French, how does funding infrastructure upgrades in national forests through the legacy restoration fund further support local economies and create jobs, uh in those communities in areas like Mount Hood?

1:46:43 – 1:47:48

Thank you. Uh, great question. I think one of the things about the national forest system is how rural it's footprint really is across the system. The recreation economy, it it it creates almost one point three trillion dollars in revenue for gateway communities. We know from our data that nearly forty percent of the visitors that that are visiting National Forest have traveled at least a day, and have spent a night outside of their homes in a place that's in a gateway community. That translates to like a hundred and sixty thousand jobs that are just created by having those places to go to. So the importance of this is people stop coming to places if you don't provide the customer service or the infrastructure they need to enjoy those places. And that's the critical part about the Grand American Outdoors Act. It ensures that when they go to that place, they have the campsite, they have the water, they have the trash pickup services, I mean, that's you want people to continue to connect with this great legacy.

1:47:49 – 1:48:50

Thank you for that. I also wanna make sure that we all recognize that it's not just the dollars, it's the people who in empower us to do that, so we have to address the staffing shortages as well. But it's also the economic uh impact is why I also wanna raise a concern as my ranking member um raised earlier about one provision in this bill it codifies the one hundred dollar minimum entrance fee for foreign visitors at federal recreational sites. And unlike the current administrative policy, which applies to the eleven high visitation parks, the statutory language extends that floor to every federal site that charges any entrance or amenity fee. At a time when Oregon's tourism industry is already facing headwinds and we get many visitors from our northern neighbor, I am concerned about the signal that this sends to international visitors who bolster our local especially in these gateway communities. So Deputy Secretary McGregor, how is the implementation of the international visitor fees progressing in this early phase?

1:48:51 – 1:49:25

I I understand your concern, but I was just reviewing data yesterday or the day before where um after um several months of having this higher visitor fee, we um are reaching record attendance at some of our high our largest parks. So we still believe um people are coming, they're not hindered, they're just paying more. And that money, we have to remember, is eighty percent of it staying in that park and being reinvested into cleaning up the trash fixing the bathrooms making sure you have offset costs for plumbing, et cetera.

1:49:26 – 1:49:44

Understood, and I also know that those visitor fees are a small fraction of it, but important nonetheless. Have you observed measurable impacts on overall visitation specific pressure points in the parks and there has been wide-spread reporting on delays coming into the parks and and visitors being turned away.

1:49:44 – 1:51:26

Thank you for that question, because this is something that's so incredibly important to secretary Burgum. Um, when he came in, he's like, we gotta fix this, um, this obstacle of tr- of people sitting in line trying to get into our national parks. And we, at a certain point, it does require increased infrastructure. Um, we do have to have a conversation of do we have enough gates? And if we're gonna build a new gate, how much, how many years is it gonna take to build that gate, expand that road and get people in? So we're having that discussion now. Um, hopefully you see in some of your parks that we're using different pilot projects. We call it the, I probably have to be careful, um, but we do call it the Chick-fil-A model. Like, can we use some of these, um, different technologies to walk through the line and get people in? And then make sure that the flat hats who are, and just for the park service, um, who are at the gate, they might wanna be used to answer more questions for families who are like, what's the best place for us to take our kids right now between four and six years old, that will the, where they will get the best experience. Not everyone coming in has the same desire to speak and and some just wanna get in fast. We're looking at everything that we can to get people in faster and enhance their experience so they're not sitting for three hours and I think we had a recent, I hate to go back to Yosemite, Um, but our superintendent there is doing a great job, and as we all know, Yosemite, you're coming in through that very s- the architecture of Yosemite, we're not changing that portal view, right? So we have to be creative in how we get people in faster, and we h- we hit a record a couple weeks ago with a lower number, and lower um yield time for people sitting in line. We're able to better track that now.

1:51:27 – 1:51:31

Thank you, I recognize my t- time has expired. Thank you, Mister Chair.

1:51:31 – 1:51:50

I now recognize myself for five minutes. Miss Andrews, you uh are doing a great job with the state of Arkansas, outdoor recreation is growing in Arkansas. How can the state of Arkansas and the federal government uh partner together more to improve the the visitor experience and the outdoor recreation economy?

1:51:52 – 1:53:01

Thank you for the question. That is something that we're seeing in Arkansas is the increase in partnership between both private entities and our public entities. One example of that is the uh Trails at Mena Bike Park. So once it's done and once it's created, it will be the largest downhill gravity-fed lift-served mountain bike park in the country. And that is a partnership between Arkansas State Parks, the City of Mena, and the Forest Service. I see Dan here, he's been a huge and pivotal part of that. Um and continued collaboration on projects monumental projects that will set Arkansas up for success are what we need to see more of. And I think that is in the world of of funding and and needs and deferred maintenance does not become less expensive. When you postpone it, it becomes more expensive. And so with rising costs and and funding considerably continuing to be a needed uh thing in our economy, we have to consider better collaboration with all of our partners to get some of these big projects across the line.

1:53:01 – 1:53:24

Thank you. That is an exciting project over at MENA. Uh, Mister McCaskill, you've seen a tremendous growth in the private businesses in Hot Springs. Uh, what more could happen to create a better partnership between the federal government and private businesses who are looking to provide those services that you talked about - refrigerator magnets among others?

1:53:25 – 1:54:20

Great question. Um, as I said, uh, the the attraction brings the people to town and the businesses service the demand that they bring with them. Uh, so I think the the existing maintenance of the public lands and making sure there's continued investment in the public lands and that they have what they need, to to continue continue operating um is probably the biggest the biggest thing that I can think of. You know, I've been looking at lots of issues in the in the future and and how we address and make decisions about those uh issues are either a threat or an opportunity. And so one of my big goals is trying to turn threats into opportunities right now. Obviously we have a a very large Army, Navy, former hospital complex that sits on the on the federal lands that that our community has been grappling with over the last six years or so since it has been vacant. Um but but there's a lot of opportunity um for the future there on that piece of property.

1:54:22 – 1:55:20

Thank you, Mister McCaskill, and uh my final question is to Mister Costner, and again appreciate your stories. I'm especially like the story about how you talked about going to this familiar place, and you had an expectation. And you testified that the experience of your expectation matched. And I know that's something that's important to you. We've you've heard how the state of Arkansas wants to work with private entities with the federal government. how the city of Hot Springs wants to work with federal government and private entities. You mentioned you're you're looking at a potential project here in Hot Springs. Can you talk more about how we need the experience to match the expectation and how we can partner together and leverage private money with uh working with the federal government to create a better experience for everyone.

1:55:22 – 1:55:23

Yeah, I mean, yeah.

1:55:23 – 1:55:27

Yeah, this button. The thank you.

1:55:27 – 1:55:27

Thank you, Alvin.

1:55:28 – 2:00:34

I'm gonna graduate, I just know it. Um, I think you come to a place not looking to change it, but to see why people come here. And I think if you, you start at the very beginning, if you think historically, let's just talk about hot springs, this - this place exists and it has a colorful, colorful history and you know, I - I - I come here and I see things that are - that are - that look like they're opportunities. I mean, I'm not - I'm an entrepreneur. I'm kind of a - a unicorn in my own business. I pay for my own films. I - it's not - you know, there's one thing to have dreams and there's another way to approach that dream and it's a fairly practical way. So when I come to Hot Springs with a person I partnered with, Rick Williams, we look at the things that maybe are missing from Hot Springs and when you identify those, then you can actually see how it integrates here. And then the thing that perhaps you're even thinking about starts to touch with the the national park, starts to p- touch with the state park. And lo and behold, if your thinking is correct, if it's about a quote unquote customer experience and expectation of coming here, and it touches on that, then it c- has the potential to be a win-win situation. What a terrible uh phrase, I hate it. It was win-win. That's bullshit, I don't think. It has to be in sync. It has to be in line. And so, um, parking was mentioned and one of the projects that we're talking about, it's not just one project, uh, you know, um, My imagination caught fire here. But we'd, we, uh, a project that we're thinking of, we wanna do, involves parking. It involves some practical things, but the people that come from around the world, and they do, to come to Hot Springs, they have an expectation. When I was a little boy, it looked perfect. It didn't change. It made me excited to bring my friends, because I would secretly look out this side of my face to see the wonder when they saw how perfect it was. And we s- when we know what's imperfect about a place, it's a choice to either fix it, improve it, or whatever. But when you have the namesake of Hot Springs, you w- you want it to live up to the expectation. When you go through that portal at Yosemite, it exceeds it. Um, Hot Springs can over-deliver ultimately for people who come here. I think sometimes there's like If you think about salmon, okay, here I go, story. Hate it. But if you think about sometimes salmon that hang out in front of a in the ocean in front of a river, waiting to go up streams, but it's been blocked through construction, through jams, we block that. But we know that salmon have come for the last fifty years wondering with the expectation of going up to a place that they went for time immortal. And they gather hot springs unbelievably. It has nine million people a year or more come here. And there's this single street and it's more than not a street. Forgive me, it's more than a street. But there's an expectation and I think the parks wanna live up to it. The parks wanna have access in there. And so I believe in what, I believe in what is here. And I believe in what can be improved, and I think uh that's the promise of the national parks, that they're never gonna really be touched. This infrastructure is a very real thing. It's very real to decide, " Yeah, we gotta make the road wider." Why? Well, we need to think practically why. It's just because there are so many. So then it becomes a solve. And and and it's not always easy. But it's it's it's a it's good stewardship to s- to - to do this, to - to - this - this has - this work has to be done. These national parks exist. It - Are people getting the right access? Can they enjoy it? Are they getting off this boulevard and in a short amount of time into God's green world? So, uh, I come at it with a practical standpoint, uh, completely. It starts with a dream, but then the work begins. And the work has begun. with this reauthorization. I'm - I'm really - as an American, I'm really - I have very l- I have - sometimes I get way too much credit for doing shit. I'm just here supporting what is a really profound and obvious good work. It's obvious what we're talking about. And th- thank you for letting me be a part of it. And um, and hopefully speaking for people sitting out in the chairs.

2:00:36 – 2:02:12

Thank you very much. I ask unanimous consent to enter two letters of support for GAO A two fifty into the record from the Outdoor Recreation Roundtable, and Western Energy Alliance. I'd also like to enter into the record a statement from Representative French Hill, our co-sponsor of the bill, who was not able to join us today without objection. So ordered. Again, I want to thank the witnesses for your time, for your uh effort to come to Hot Springs, to my colleagues who traveled from DC and will be soon dispersing to various places all around the country. Thank you so much for being here. As with any hearing, members of the committee may have some additional questions for our witnesses, and we will ask that the witnesses respond to those in writing. Under committee rule three, members of the committee must submit questions to the committee clerk by five PM on Wednesday, June seventeenth, twenty twenty six. The hearing record will be held open for ten business days for these responses. I'd like to direct any ar- interested members of the public to fill out one of our comment sheets which are available on the table by the exit you can also pick up a postcard which has more information about how to follow the committee's efforts to advance the Great American Outdoors Act two fifty finally I encourage everyone to visit the committee on natural resources' web site, natural resources dot house dot gov we we will post a video recording of this hearing. You can also find information there about the committee's work to expand. and improve recreational access to our national parks and public lands. If there is no further business, without objection, the Committee on Natural Resources stands adjourned.

2:02:13 – 2:02:13

Right.

Morning digest

Start every morning briefed on yesterday’s hearings

A free weekday email covering yesterday’s hearings and transcripts newly unlocked in the archive.

Free weekday email. Unsubscribe anytime.