House seal

House · Hearing transcript

Subcommittee Rosters, GSA Resolutions and Water Resources Development Act

Tuesday, July 14, 2026

Summary

  • Committee approved revised subcommittee rosters adding James Gallagher and advanced GSA optimization resolutions and H.R. 9497 WRDA toward final recorded votes.

  • No witnesses testified; Mike Collins, Dina Titus, and others described district water needs driving bipartisan support for WRDA including drought resilience, ports, and flood control projects nationwide.

  • John Garamendi opposed the GSA resolution as dismantling Education, while Eleanor Norton countered Education moves to 500 D Street regardless.

  • Sam Graves and Rick Larsen collaborated on bipartisan WRDA while members split over Scott Perry's firearms provision and GSA resolutions.

  • Postponed recorded votes on GSA resolutions, Perry firearms amendment, and Onder cost-share amendment must still occur before WRDA advances to House floor.

Transcript PDF

Download the full transcript as a PDF

Ready to print, read offline or share, with the summary, everyone who spoke and the video time of every paragraph.

Your PDF downloads right away. We also email you a link to it, for another device.

Hearing Details

Members Who Spoke

View on Congress.gov

Transcript

Unknown30:28 – 30:30

I think the thing the framework is

30:30 – 30:32

He's hearing things that run counter to his narrative, anything like that.

Unknown30:31 – 30:32

Oh.

30:35 – 32:58

I call the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure to order. Pursuant to Committee Rule six F, House Rule eleven, clause two HF, the Chairman may propone further proceedings today on any question of approving any measure or matter or adopting an amendment which recorded vote of the yeas and the nays are ordered. I'd ask unanimous consent that the Chairman be authorized to declare recess at any time during today's meeting without objection that is so ordered. All rosters and checks have been distributed electronically, and paper copies are also available here in the hearing room. As a reminder, the committee may use an electronic voting system for any requested recorded votes. And today the committee is considering approval of updated subcommittee rosters due to changes on the minor majority side. two general service administration capital investment and leasing program resolutions, and an amendment in the nature of a substitute to H R ninety-four ninety-seven the Water Resources Development Act. Finally, I'd ask unanimous consent for the committee to use an amendments roster for any items under consideration by the committee, and without objection. Um, that is so ordered. Our first item in business today is the approval of revised subcommittee roster due to membership changes on the majority site, so I call up The subcommittee roster is for consideration. Without objection, the rosters will be considered as read and I recognize myself for a quick statement. Pursuant to House Resolution thirteen eighty-one, Congressman James Gallagher of California was appointed to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, following Congressman Shreve's resignation from the committee to move to the Committee on Appropriations. I'm pleased to welcome the newest member of the House of Representatives, Congressman James Gallagher from California to the committee. Mr. Gallagher will be joining the subcommittees on aviation, highways and transit, and railroads, pipelines, and hazardous materials. Mr. Gallagher recently won a special election to fill the seat, previously held by our good friend, Doug LaMalfa, for whom Mr. Gallagher served as a fellow. He also spent more than ten years in the California State Assembly, and is a fifth generation rice and walnut farmer. This committee still has a lot of important work to do this Congress, Mr. Gallagher, we are glad to have you. uh join us on the uh on the committee. Any further discussion? Go ahead, Mr. Gallier, you wanna say a few words?

32:58 – 33:50

Uh, thank you, Mister Chairman, for that very nice introduction, and uh thank you for your leadership and thank you to all the members of the Transportation Infrastructure Committee for the support you've already shown, since I joined the committee just a few days ago. I'm grateful uh for that warm welcome and I look forward to working closely with all of you throughout the years we advance uh responsible bipartisan policies. I also want to acknowledge Congressman LaMalfa's long and effective service on behalf of the North State in California. He set a strong foundation for advocating for our water, our infrastructure, and rural community needs, and I'm committed to building on that uh great legacy as I step into this role. I'm excited to roll up my sleeves and get to work on aviation, rail, and highway subcommittees. And I want to thank the chairman and members for this Great opportunity. We're just getting started and I'm eager to contribute wherever I can. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and I yield back.

33:50 – 35:10

Thank you. Is there any further discussion? Seeing none, I'd ask unanimous consent for the approval of revised subcommittee rosters due to membership changes on the majority side without objection. That is so ordered and the revised subcommittee roster has been approved. Our next item consideration are two resolutions for projects in the GSA capital investment and leasing program. And I'd ask unanimous consent to call up the resolutions in block, and they're now considered as read and open for amendment at any point, without objection. That is so ordered. I recognize myself real quick for a statement. So the two GSA resolutions we are considering today include optimization programs for fiscal years twenty twenty-five and twenty twenty-six. These prospectuses will fund critical projects that will ultimately reduce liability to the taxpayer, realize a return on property sales, and ensure space usage is consistent with requirements set in the public buildings reform that we enacted in WERDA twenty twenty four. I want to thank subcommittee chairman Perry for his work on ensuring that these projects make sense to the taxpayer and with that, I'd urge my colleagues to support these resolutions and I now recognize uh Rick for his statement.

35:11 – 36:08

Thank you, Mr. Chair, uh, Mr. Chair, I support the two GSA resolutions before us today. Both resolutions support GSA's optimization program, which GSA introduced in FY twenty-five to fund the work needed to maximize the federal union portfolio and dispose of underutilized space. Products to be funded, uh, include building renovations, space re- reconfiguration, and agency relocations. One of these resolutions amends a resolution passed by this committee in fiscal year twenty-five. for a uh one hundred and fifty million dollars in ads and additional um hundred and four million seven hundred ten thousand which is equal to the amount already appropriated by congress. The other resolution before us today provides um about well these are big numbers I'll let you read it uh a lot more which is less than GSA requested in FY twenty six but equal to what's already been appropriated by congress to ensure that optimization fund cannot be used to fund priorities not supported by this committee as well these resolutions include a new clause requiring GSA to

36:22 – 36:24

Any other members wish to be heard? It's Gary Mindy.

36:26 – 39:26

Uh, Mister Chairman, on the resolution, I I rise in strong opposition to this GSA resolution. And let's be very clear about what we're considering today. This isn't just about moving offices around. federal buildings. This is about whether Congress is going to rubber stamp another stamp in the Trump administration's effort to dismantle the Department of Education. The administration has already illegally cut more than fifteen hundred employees in the Department of Education's and moved various functions to other agencies the department's own Inspector General says these cuts have undermined its ability to do Cong- the job Congress has assigned it. Now they're using these cuts as an excuse to take away the department's headquarters. Let's be clear. If they close their offices, we may not be able to rebuild the Department of Education, even if the Democrats win back Congress and the White House. That's not good governance. That's not cost savings. That's manufacturing a problem just to justify an op- an outcome that they wanted all along. That is the destruction of public education in this country. Taxpayer dollars are aren't being used to strengthen the nation's education systems. or to help our students in to succeed. They're being used to make it harder for any future Congress and administration to restore the Department of Education to its full strength. This year's, the president's budget requests includes billions of dollars in cuts to America's public schools and universities. Meanwhile, the president has requested a thirty-five percent increase for nuclear weapons programs in the Department of Energy which is the department, that is to move into the Department of Education's headquarters. This year the administration's requested ninety-eight billion dollars for nuclear weapons and only seventy-five billion for the entire Department of Education. Should we compare that? Yes, we should. We consider we should consider our priorities. It's bad enough that Trump wants to spend more money on weapons than on education, but we should not be complicit. in this process. We should also be very much aware that there's discussion that the Department of Ed's will move to some other building somewhere else in this city. Well, maybe that's true, but that's not in this resolution. It's not anywhere near it. So let's be very, very clear about this. This administration wants to dump the books, burn the books, and build the bombs. That's where this is all going. So step back for a moment, take a look at what we're doing here. we are eviscerating the dep- the education role of the federal government in the universities, in support for students, and in a- and in research and beyond. If this committee approves this resolution, we've allowed one more irreversible step towards dismantling the Department of Education. I urge my colleagues to oppose this resolution for those reasons. I yield back.

39:31 – 41:23

Eleanor. i strongly support this resolution i have worked for more than a decade to dispose of the department of energy for headquarters to facilitate the development of the southwest federal center into a thriving mixed use neighborhood which will generate tax revenue housing and amenities for the district of columbia this resolution is necessary to begin the disposal of the department of energy's headquarters while i strongly oppose the trump administration's illegally dismantling of the department of education this resolution is about the department of energy not the department of education the department of education will be leaving its headquarters and moving a block away into a federal leased vacant twelve story class a office building at five hundred d street regardless of whether the department of energy leaves or stays in its current headquarters the forestal building the general services administration confirmed in writing yesterday that it has existing funding and authority to move the department of education to five hundred d street and that the department of education's move is not contingent on the outcome of this resolution in short voting no on this resolution blocks the department of energy not the department of education from moving i urge members to vote yes on this resolution

41:26 – 41:27

Uh, Representative Larson.

41:26 – 41:27

Uh, Representative Larson.

41:28 – 41:48

Yeah, just to just clarify something. The the resolution in particular is they're we're we're we're addressing these en bloc, uh, but the one in particular that they're discussing is, um, listed as, uh, PLP zero zero one MU twenty six, the second one, just for members' clarification on that. Thanks. Thank you.

41:50 – 42:05

Anyone else wish to be heard? Saying no one. Are there any amendments to the GSA uh resolutions en bloc? Hearing Yeah.

42:06 – 42:08

Are you proposing an en bloc vote here?

42:08 – 42:12

Yeah. We've already adopted that. Nobody objected.

42:12 – 42:12

We did.

42:15 – 42:21

Hearing none, the question is now on adoption of GSA resolutions en bloc. All those in favor, signify by saying aye.

42:22 – 42:22

Aye.

42:22 – 42:24

All opposed, signify by saying nay.

42:25 – 42:25

Nay.

42:26 – 42:27

The opinion of the chair, the ayes have it.

42:28 – 42:32

Why don't we have a vote here? Recorded vote.

42:33 – 43:22

Gentleman requests to record a vote on GSA resolutions on block. As previously announced, presenta- to committee rule six F, further proceedings on the question um will be postponed. Our next item for consideration is H R ninety four ninety seven, the Water Resource Development Act. of twenty twenty six. This is our word of bill. I'd ask unanimous consent to discharge the subcommittee on water, resources and environment from further consideration of H R ninety four, ninety seven without objection. Um, that is so ordered. I now call up the bill for consideration. Without objection, the first reading of the bill is dispensed with. The bill is now considered as read and open for amendment at any point. Recognize myself to offer an amendment in the nature of a substitute Clerk, please designate designate

Clerk43:23 – 43:27

An amendment in the nature of a substitute to HR nine four nine seven, offered by Chairman Graves.

43:29 – 46:26

Without objection, the amendment in the nature of substitute shall be considered as read and shall be considered as the base text for further amendment. I recognize myself for uh five minutes for a quick statement. Today we are considering the Water Resources Development Act of twenty twenty six, proudly continuing the tradition of advancing WERDA bills in this committee. As Congress marks the seventh consecutive Congress to consider WERDA legislation since returning to a regular two year schedule in two thousand and fourteen I'm proud that this committee continues to find common ground and work together to develop this very crucial um piece of legislation. Consistent WERDA authorizations allow for the Army Corps of Engineers to build and maintain safe and reliable water infrastructure Across the country, keeping the nation's waterways navigable, our neighborhoods protected, and maximizing the benefits of water resources for all Americans. WERDA is a member-driven process, and I'd like to recognize the nearly three hundred and fifty members that submitted requests for this year's WERDA process. This year we received over two thousand member submissions, and these submissions are an essential part of the process that guide the committee in developing a bill that addresses the water infrastructure needs across the country. This bill maximizes the Corps' ability to work with non-federal sponsors to study and construct wa- or major water infrastructure projects across the country by streamlining the Corps' processes empowering local stakeholders and enhancing infrastructure resilience throughout our nation's inland and coastal waterways from Missouri this bill takes action to strengthen our flood control system by expanding the ways our levee owners can work with the Corps to provide resilient flood risk infrastructure for our communities along the inland waterways. Board of twenty twenty-six provides necessary streamlined assistance to levee districts facing realignment and maintenance changes. Further, the bill strengthens Missouri's representation in Missouri river management through interstate collaborations like a new upper Missouri river basin sedimentation study. What if twenty twenty six makes targeted and common sense reforms to allow the Corps to deliver resilient infrastructure through the country that will enhance our nation's navigable waterways solidify our flood risk management, infrastructure, and protect our waters. Our nation just celebrated its two hundred and fiftieth birthday and this bill authorizes the Corps to make important investments in building and expanding our nation's infrastructure prepare for the next two hundred and fifty years. And I'd like to reiterate my thanks to uh, subcommittee chairman Mike Collins and ranking member Larson, and subcommittee ranking member Wilson, for their work in continuing the bipartisan tradition of considering word of bills in this committee. And I now recognize Rick for his statement.

46:27 – 46:45

Thank you. Um, in the interest of of time, moving things along, I have a excellent seven, we're a seven page statement that I will send to anybody who wants a copy of it. Um, uh, Marilyn Strickland's on the record for that. Uh, but I would encourage folks to, uh, support the bill. And, uh, let's get moving. Gotta yield back.

46:48 – 46:50

Anyone else? Representative Collins.

46:55 – 50:20

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Uh, thank you for your leadership and support also in developing this important piece of legislation. I, uh, I'd also like to thank my colleagues, Ranking Member Larson and Ranking Member Wilson for their partnership in developing the Water uh Resources Development Act of twenty twenty six. Um, this bill would not be possible without the input from my colleagues throughout the House of Representatives. And I'm proud to say that this bill addresses the water resource needs of communities throughout the country, from Lake Lanier in Georgia to the Port of Long Beach in California. As Chairman of the Water Resources and Environment Subcommittee, I've had the opportunity to travel across the country to visit dozens of core projects learn firsthand what it is to take to build resilient infrastructure, and hear what these projects mean to local communities. I stood atop the Attics and Barca Reservoirs in Texas. I walked through the Rio de la Plata in Puerto Rico, and I toured the Chickamauga Locking Dam in Tennessee. These experiences have reinforced my understanding of the Corps' mission and the importance of ensuring our nation continues to invest in safe, resilient, and future-ready infrastructure. The water process is a grassroots effort. At its heart, this bill starts with our local communities. And we thank all of the nearly three hundred and fifty congressional offices that did the outreach and made their constituents' voices heard in developing this bill. Following the Trump administration's historic announcement, building infrastructure, not paperwork, Water Twenty Twenty-six makes targeted improvements to the Army Corps limiting the federal overreach and empowering local communities to make resilient infrastructure investments. American ports, harbors, and intercoastal waterways are the nation's economic backbone. Water twenty twenty six empowers the Corps to enhance our waterways, which are the are vital for the nation's economic strength, reliable supply chains, and commercial navigation. Water twenty twenty six delivers for Georgia and the country as a whole. This bill strengthens several programs and establishes an office to expand alternative delivery methods within the Corps. Alternative delivery methods provide non-federal sponsors greater fle- flexibility to work with the Corps and get projects done faster. Further, this bill protects our economy and reduces the risk of interruptions to commuter uh commercial navigation by providing the Corps necessary flexibility in implementing dredge material managed projects. I'm especially proud that this bill expands on the core's ability to contract with local law enforcement to help protect life and property in recreation areas, such as campgrounds. By empowering local communities, we are shifting power away from Washington and toward the states, local sponsors, and property owners. H. R. ninety-four ninety-seven makes targeted reforms to reduce federal bottlenecks and gives locals a seat at the table to drive proj project priorities. These are just a handful of the many ways Water twenty twenty six invests in America. Again, I want to thank Chairman Graves, Ranking Member Larson, and Ranking Member Wilson for their hard work in putting this bill together. I also want to thank my fellow committee members for their contributions to the water process. And I urge my colleagues to support this bill and yield back my time.

50:21 – 50:22

Miss Titus.

50:25 – 54:09

You know. I'm sorry, I didn't understand you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Uh, thank you, Chairman, Ranking Member Larson, and your staffs for working to negotiate this strong bipartisan bill. It does address, as you heard, water challenges in all regions. I'm especially concerned about the arid Southwest. I represent the heart of Southern Nevada, and if you're familiar with my district, you know that water is the cornerstone of lives and livelihoods. But both are at risk now because of the prolonged drought. and increasing aridity in the Colorado River Basin. On average, natural flows from the tributaries of the Colorado River are twenty percent less today than they were in the last century. Year after year, the communities along the river consume more water than is available. And despite that truth, states have yet to come to an agreement for what will happen when the operating guidelines for the river expire this year. So we need to use all the tools that we have to conserve water and mitigate this crisis. While this may be seen as a Western issue today, more and more communities are gonna be experiencing prolonged droughts and water insecurity as the climate continues to change. That's why I'm glad that Water Twenty twenty six strengthens the Army Corps of Engineers' role in protecting our s- water supplies. For example, provisions I champion to create an office of water supply, water conservation, and drought resilience. Having dedicated staff at the Army Corps focused on water supply issues will make a world of difference going forward. The bill also establishes a new continuing authority for the Corps to carry out small scale projects for drought resiliency. And it directs the Army Corps to consider the impact of data centers on water supply and conservation. This is an increasingly uh important issue that we see in the news today. Consider that about two thirds of the upcoming data centers are slated to be built in regions uh experiencing drought. Communities want transparency about how this influx of data centers is impacting their water supply. Just last week the Bureau of Land Management managed to green light a data center in my congressional district without any public engagement. Now while the bill before us today is not a silver bullet to deliver on transparency, it certainly starts the conversation at the federal level. I'm also pleased the bill includes provisions I championed to create a pilot program on using natural infrastructure in dryland streams in arid and drought prone regions. This pilot program will be beneficial in Nevada where eighty-eight percent of streams are ephemeral. That includes our Amigoosa River, which was recently labeled one of the country's most endangered rivers. I'm also proud to have carried provisions that made it in the bill that will help projects currently underway in Nevada, including the Truckee River Flood Management Project. Uh, also in our provisions to add projects that mitigate aquatic and invasive species to the list of authorized projects under the Tahoe Section one O eight program. Invasive species like the New Zealand mud snail threaten Lake Tahoe, and its bustling tourism and outdoor recreation area. Uh, in closing, I think there are great provisions in here that will impact all of our districts. It's word of twenty twenty-six is a major step forward for our water policy, and I'm proud to support it, and I yield back.

54:11 – 54:12

Mister Webster.

54:14 – 54:22

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I just uh would like to ask for unanimous consent to include a letter of support for the water bill from the Port of Tampa Bay.

54:22 – 54:28

Without objection. Mister Carbajal.

54:30 – 57:16

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I want to add my voice in support of the Water Resource Development Act of twenty twenty six, before us today. Water is an important bipartisan bill we consider in this committee because it is how Congress helps make real investments in our communities. For my district in the central coast of California, I am proud that this bill delivers meaningful results. All five of the section two nineteen environmental infrastructure projects I submitted were included in this legislation, totaling sixty-six point five million dollars for communities across my district. That includes thirty million for the Los Olivos Community District to modernize critical wastewater infrastructure, twenty-five million for the City of Ojai to improve water reliability and environmental sustainability, six point three million for the City of Lompoc for essential water infrastructure improvements, three point two million for the Summerlin Sanitary District to upgrade aging was- wastewater systems, and two million for the City of Solvang to strengthen local water infrastructure. These may not be flashy projects, but they make a difference for everyday Central Coast residents. They mean cleaner water, safer communities, stronger drought res- resilience, and better quality of life for the people we represent. I am also pleased that this bill authorizes the Army Corps to move forward with repairs to the Morro Bay revetment and seawall. This is a critical infrastructure that protects Morro Bay Harbor, supports maritime commerce, and safeguards the local economy. In addition, this legislation includes a directive to the court to prioritize the city along folks' stormwater improvement study, which is essential to addressing flooding risks and improving public safety. Despite all the noise and posturing that happens in Washington, I am glad to be part of a process that shows that when we work together, we can bring federal resources home to help local communities. This is why I came to Congress, to deliver results for my constituents. At a time when families are facing higher utility bills and local water systems are struggling with aging infrastructure, we cannot afford to delay these investments. By helping communities modernize their water infrastructure now, WERDA can reduce costly emergency repairs, improve system efficiency, and help keep water costs more affordable for American families. I want to thank Chairman Graves, Ranking Member Larson, Chairman Collins, Ranking Member Wilson, and all of the staff for their work in putting together this strong bipartisan bill. I urge my colleagues to support its passage. Miss Chair, I yield back.

57:18 – 57:18

Dr. Babin.

57:25 – 1:00:02

Thank you, Mister Chairman and Ranking Member Larson, for your leadership, for holding today's mark-up. I also want to thank Chairman Graves uh for his continued work on this legislation and his commitment strengthening our nation's water resources infrastructure. We are here today to consider the Water Resources Development Act of twenty twenty six, a bipartisan bill that reflects Congress's long-standing commitment to investing in America's ports, waterways, flood control systems, and other critical infrastructure. Through WERTA, we provide the US Army Corps of Engineers with the direction and tools that they need to keep our economy moving and our uh communities protected. This legislation has a significant impact on southeast Texas. My district is home to some of the nation's most critical energy and maritime assets, including Port of Houston, the Houston Ship Channel, Cedarport area, and communities that rely on efficient navigation, infrastructure, and strong flood protection. These assets support thousands of jobs, strengthen our nation's energy security, and help keep American commerce moving. I'm very pleased that this bill includes several provisions that will directly benefit Southeast Texas. By clarifying harbor maintenance trust fund allocation requirements for donor and energy transfer ports, authorizing the review of excess federal lands in Chambers, Galveston and Harris counties, and expediting the Cedarport feasibility study, this legislation will strengthen our region's infrastructure, support economic growth, and ensure Southeast Texas remains a critical engine of a of American commerce. These are meaningful improvements that will help move critical projects forward, strengthen our ports, and better serve the communities and industries that depend on them. Beyond Texas, this legislation strengthens the Corps' ability to streamline project delivery, reduce unnecessary bureaucracy, increase accountability, and give non-federal partners greater flexibility to advance locally driven projects. Strong ports and inland waterways are essential to our economy and vital to our nation's energy security, supply chain resilience, and long-term competitiveness. For years, Werder has been one of Congress's most successful bipartisan efforts because it focuses on practical infrastructure investments that deliver lasting benefits to communities nationwide. I appreciate the work that has gone into this legislation. And I look forward to supporting its advancement today, and I yield back, Mister Chairman.

1:00:06 – 1:00:06

Mister Stan.

1:00:07 – 1:03:29

Thank you very much, uh, Mister Chairman, and to Chairman Graves and Ranking Member Larson and Committee Chairman Wilson, uh, and actually Committee Chairman Collins and Ranking Member Wilson, I apologize. I appreciate your leadership in shaping this important legislation for our nation's water resources infrastructure. Our nation's infrastructure needs a shot in the arm. That's true for dams and washes, as it is for roads and bridges. Nowhere is that clearer than in my home state of Arizona. Far too long, the federal government has failed to deliver long-term investments we needed to address decades-long drought and aging infrastructure. And Arizona's water security is tied up now more than ever in the ongoing Colorado River Compact negotiations. Colorado River, a critical piece of our water supply portfolio, is nearing a crisis point. The river's reservoirs are at historic lows due to hotter temperatures and little snow, putting critical hydropower infrastructure at risk. And even though Arizona uses less water today than it did sixty years ago, we'll have to make new sacrifices and significant investments to protect our water supplies and help communities hit hard by drought. I'm the only one from Arizona on this important committee. I'll make sure the federal government is a full partner as we address the challenges ahead. Word of Twenty-six offers us a real bipartisan opportunity to put that partnership to work. The bill advances strong drought resiliency provisions, a new office of water supply and drought resilience, a new continuing authority program for small drought projects, and new authorities to tackle invasive species and restore wa- restore water storage capacity. It includes thirty Arizona-specific projects from Phoenix's Trace Rio's ecosystem restoration work and to flood control efforts in Pinal County. This bill also builds on Arizona's own environmental infrastructure authority that I created six years ago. This EI program extended a lifeline for our communities and tribal nations that are facing increasing uncertainty over their water supply. Today we're adding another a hundred and fifty-one million to that authority. Our communities are investing in water lines, wells, wastewater systems, aquifer recharge projects to stretch every drop of water as far as it can go. We funded two dozen projects under the Arizona Environmental Infrastructure Authority and according to the Corps there's forty more communities, hoping their projects move forward next. But here's the frustrating reality. Of the more than two dozen projects Arizona Environmental Infrastructure Authority funded, less than ten have broken ground. That's unworkable. Our communities cannot wait years for projects that are needed today. The Corps has begun to streamline NEPA processes and expand categorical exclusions for EI projects. I'm committed to ensuring permitting processes do not delay and drive up costs for critical works. I've also thought for rural and tribal communities to have greater access to those investments. While this key while this bill expands key partnerships, Congress must do more to eliminate barriers across programs and lower federal cost shares for communities that need assistance most. Speed, efficiency, and equity must be our standards as we go forward. So I look forward to working with the chair and ranking member to advance these common sense reforms. Arizona is facing a once in a century challenge. WERTA twenty twenty six is the water infrastructure boost that our communities need.

1:03:29 – 1:03:29

Four.

1:03:30 – 1:03:43

So thank you to ranking member Larson, Chairman Graves, the Water Resources Subcommittee for your important work on this bill, and I'm glad to keep working together to make sure all Arizona communities, city, tribal, rural, can make the most of their water supply. Thank you. I yield back.

1:03:45 – 1:03:46

Chairman yields, Mister Nels.

1:03:46 – 1:08:04

Mister Chairman, thank you for recognizing me. The the Water Resources Development Act has long been one of the best examples of Congress working to invest in America's infrastructure, strengthen our economy, and ensure the US Corps Army Corps of Engineers has the tools necessary to keep our waterways, ports, flood control projects, and navigation systems functioning safely and efficiently. For Texas, this bill couldn't come at a more important time. The Gulf Texas Gulf Coast is one of the most economically significant regions in the United States. Our ports move hundreds of billions of dollars in commerce every year, support millions of jobs, strengthen our nation's energy security, and serve as critical gateways for both domestic and international trade. The Port Houston complex alone is one of the busiest ports in America, handling record volumes of cargo while serving as the backbone of our nation's petrochemical and energy industries. Our ports are essential to the strength of both the Texas and nation economically. That's why I work to ensure word of bill delivers meaningful results for Texas. Reliable water supply is essential to our nation's economy, our manufacturers, our communities, and our future. In Texas, we understand that firsthand. Approximately thirty-three percent of the U uh nation's US Army core water supply storage space is in Texas. and is vital to meet growing water demands across the state and in my district. Anyone who has worked with the Army Corps of Engineers knows that projects can take decades to move forward. And I know the agency is taking steps to try to speed up these timelines with their new Building Infrastructure Not Paperwork initiative. The following provisions further support that. Section one O one B creates a dedicated office of water supply, water conservation, and drought resiliency to coordinate policy, improve communication with local partners, like the Brazos River Authority in my district, and help ensure the Corps fully implements the important water supply authorities Congress enacted in subtitle B of order twenty twenty four. Section one thirty two reinforces the need to maximize the use of existing authorities while explicitly recognizing municipal, industrial, and agricultural water supply, water conservation, and drought resiliency along the Corps's other missions. Together, these sections helped turn this committee's vision of Water twenty twenty-four into real action for our communities. They elevate water supply and the national conservation, make the Corps a better partner to communi- uh to communities across the country and ensure we're using every available tool to strengthen American prosperity. I was proud to also secure several important priorities in this word of legislation. The bill directs the Army Corps of Engineers to expedite the feasibility study for the Matagorda ship channel, helping insure the port of Port Lavaca, Point Comfort, can support continued commercial growth. It also clarifies Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund allocations to better insure donor and energy transfer ports, uh, including many in Texas, receive a fair return on the funds they generate. The legislation further requires a comprehensive study of the nation's inland and intercoastal waterways, establishes a new office of inland navigation construction management to improve project delivery and encourages uh more efficient multi-year contracting priorities. It also reauthorizes key poor civil works authorities uh through twenty thirty and provides new environmental infrastructure authority for Bessaria Fort Bannock Galveston counties, while increasing existing authority for Armarillo to strengthen critical water infrastructure across Texas. Mister Chairman, Texas continues to lead the nation in population growth, energy production, manufacturing, exports, international commerce. Our infrastructure must keep pace with that success. This word of bill makes smart investments that will strengthen navigation, improve project delivery, support economic growth, and ensure our ports of waterways remain globally competitive for decades to come. I appreciate the collaborative work that went into this legislation, and I look forward to supporting its passage. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I yield back.

1:08:11 – 1:08:13

Mrs. Sykes is recognized.

1:08:19 – 1:11:36

Thank you, uh, to the Chairman and the ranking member for holding Today's mark-up and also uh a special shout-out to Chair Collins and Ranking Member Wilson for their work on the subcommittee. Strong water infrastructure is something every community depends on, and I'm proud to have fought for the seventh consecutive bipartisan Water Resources Development Act reauthorization that will help address critical needs in Ohio's thirteenth congressional district as well as across the nation. Chief among the policies in this bill is an additional fifty million dollar authorization for environmental and infrastructure authorities in my district. This investment will allow the US Army Corps of Engineers to provide their expertise to critical water and sewer infrastructure projects that improve our local communities and strengthen our economic competitiveness. Under the Summit County Environmental Authority, fifty million dollars has been authorized to fund projects such as the Village of Lakemore stormwater pond and water treatment system programs. Vi- the Village of Richfield's new stormwater catch basin project the City of Fairlawn Chokolog Run Fish Passage Restoration Project, and the City of Monroe Falls Cuyahoga River Sinage Project. Under the Stark County new authority, forty-nine million dollars has been authorized to fund projects such as the Canton, Kromer, Water Storage Reservoir Replacement Project. There are also improvements to the Ohio Erie Canal, Loch Fore Park, and North Lawrence's sanitary sewer project. This bill also includes a language ensuring the Army Corps of Engineers prepare the city of Massillon sluice gates under section under the section eighty-one fifty-two program. This will resolve the flooding issues caused by the gates deteriorating condition, an issue that the city has been trying to rectify for many years. Parts of my water transf- water reservoir transparency act that is being co-led with Rep. Skelton also made it into the bill. It would protect and strengthen water resources in Ohio and across the country by requiring the Army Corps of Engineers to assess how new commercial and industrial uses, data centers are impacting water reservoirs. I thank Congresswoman Skuldin for her leadership in this bill in addressing an issue that is impacting all of our congressional districts and communities across the country. Finally, the bill would expedite the Corps's finalization of beneficial use for the Port of Cleveland. That will speed up the creation of the one hundred acre parkland and habitat greenway along Cleveland's Lake Erie shoreline bringing additional construction jobs and economic activity to Northeast Ohio. While there's much to celebrate in this word, I want to convey my to my colleagues that the authorization bills alone do not bring funding home to my district or yours without the necessary appropriations. And while I know it is not the jurisdiction of this committee to appropriate funds, I would encourage the Appropriations Committee to actually appropriate the funds that we authorize as not funding it will push back the development and job growth of our communities by years and sometimes decades. This is not the end of the road, and I will continue to urge the House Appropriations Committee to fully fund the Summit and Stark County environmental infrastructure authorizations, as well all of the others that increase jobs, development, and affordable clean water. Thank you, Mister Chairman, for the opportunity, and I yield back.

1:11:37 – 1:11:38

Thank you.

1:11:37 – 1:11:40

General Lady yields. Mister R- Raelser is recognized.

1:11:40 – 1:13:48

Thank you, uh, Mister Chairman. Water is one of the most important bills this committee considers. as it directly impacts communities across the country, especially coastal and flood prone communities like mine in southeastern North Carolina. Water bills produced on a consistent two year cycle ensure the Army Corps of Engineers has the direction needed to implement the objectives of Congress to protect life, property, and strengthen our maritime infrastructure. So I'm especially pleased provisions for North Carolina's seventh district are in this bill including authorization of the Surf City coastal storm, Risk Management Project. This long awaited beach nourishment project will help protect the Surf City community from future storms flooding and erosion. The project has been decades in the making, and after extensive study, review and continued advocacy at the local, state and federal levels, today's bill is a major milestone. So I especially want to commend Surf City's local leaders for their tireless commitment and advocacy. The bill also authorizes flood risk management feasibility studies for the Waikama River Basin around Whiteville, which continues to experience flooding issues in their lower downtown area, the Cross Creek watershed in Fayetteville, a major flooding risk through residential areas of that city, and the town of Topsel Beach to combat inland flooding from flood tides. The bill also authorizes a feasibility study for the water supply of the Cape Fear River and ecosystem restoration around Cumberland County. Additionally, the bill authorizes forty million for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure in White Lake. All these provisions will help protect homes, businesses, and communities throughout my district while strengthening resilience for the long term. I especially want to thank the Chairman, the Ranking Member, the Subcommittee Chairman, and the Subcommittee Ranking Member for their great leadership to produce yet again another great water bill holding true to the biennial process that has served this nation so well. I urge my colleagues to support this critical legislation and I yield back.

1:13:49 – 1:13:52

Gentlemen yields, Miss Skelton is recognized.

1:13:53 – 1:14:11

Thank you, Chair Graves and uh Collins, Ranking Members Larson and Wilson, for your hard work in putting together a strong bipartisan WERDA. I am thrilled to support a seventh consecutive WERDA uh to address local water resources uh that are needed while tackling a

1:14:14 – 1:14:14

Hmm?

1:14:14 – 1:14:18

One look at a map or a satellite image of our state

1:14:17 – 1:14:17

Yeah.

1:14:18 – 1:16:26

will tell you that water is truly a way of life in Michigan. Families and friends come together to enjoy our great lakes. Communities are supported by jobs at our hard-working ports. Farmers need water to grow our famous specialty crops, like Michigan cherries, blueberries, and apples. And this bill will protect Michigan's water resources for generations to come, something that benefits the entire country. I'm so proud of what I've been able to accomplish in this bill. Word of twenty twenty-six includes a whopping a hundred and fifteen million in new environmental infrastructure authorizations between Kent, Ottawa, and Muskegon in my district, these these counties in my district, as well as the state of Michigan to invest in drinking water, wastewater, storm water, and related infrastructure. I'm so proud of my Water Reservoir Transparency Act to assess commercial and industrial impacts uh on the core, uh particularly with respect to data centers. The bill also also authorizes a critical watershed study for Muskegon River, expedites the completion of an erosion and shoreline protection projects in Muskegon Heights. Word of twenty twenty six ensures local collaboration on water resource projects, which will boost communication. between the s- the core state and local governments during maintenance dredging. This is essential for communities like Grand Haven, Michigan, where potential dredging delays have risked local jobs and potential detrimental impacts on our supply chain. The bill additionally looks after our Great Lakes communities by adjusting wage rates for employees at the Sioux Locks, reauthorizing the Great Lakes Commission, and tackling invasive species and plants. Finally, the bill reauthorizes FEMA's high hazard potential dam program, which is particularly important after Michigan's statewide flooding this year. Again, I am so proud of this committee's work on Word of Twenty twenty six. I'm s- excited to support this bipartisan effort and to ensure generations to come can enjoy more affordable resilient water in the future. Thank you, and I yield back.

1:16:28 – 1:18:05

General lady yields, I'll recognize myself for a brief. statement. Uh first I wanna thank Chairman Graves and Ranking Member Larson for holding this mark up today. And I'm proud to speak in favor of the Water Resources Development Act of twenty twenty six. As this bill delivers sound investments to our nation's water infrastructure. In southeastern Ohio, some communities continue to face challenges in obtaining the necessary water infrastructure to supply running water in their communities. I'm proud that in the underlying bill there are over thirty-two million dollars in authorizations across southeastern Ohio which, once funded, will help local communities with water supply, water storage, and wastewater treatment plant upgrades. This bill also establishes categorical categorical permissions allowing for projects modifying Army Corps infrastructure to be constructed without the normal lengthy bureaucratic process. After many communities in my district struggled to obtain these permits from the Corps, I am proud to see these provisions included. I represent several counties along the Ohio River, which is one of the most vital inland waterways for the United States' supply chain. Each year, the Ohio River transports roughly two hundred and seventy million tons of cargo, and connects critical energy markets to the Mississippi River, the Gulf of America, and the world. Water Resources Development Act of twenty twenty six makes sound investments in water infrastructure across southeastern Ohio, establishes programs vital to the Ohio River, like the Office of Inland Navigation Construction, and reforms the Army Corps operations to speed up project timelines. I'm proud to support the A and S, I urge my colleagues to support this vital piece of legislation. I yield back and will now recognize Ms. Wilson.

1:18:18 – 1:22:37

Chair Graves, Ranking Member Larson, and Subcommittee Chair Collins, I'm proud to stand with you. as we present the Water Resources Development Act of twenty twenty six to the committee. When I discussed the Water Resources Development Act to my colleagues, I highlight the consistency and bipartisanship. When I first got to Congress in twenty eleven, I noticed something about WERDA. There was no consistency. We saw WERDA in nineteen ninety nine, in two thousand, but not another until two thousand seven, and then not another until twenty fourteen. This inconsistency was unacceptable. So I gathered my fellow Floridians, Democrats and Republicans, and we formed the Florida Ports Caucus. We, as Floridians, advocated for our deep water ports, the Everglades, and a consistent Werder cycle. We sat in the committee as one of the largest delegations, so I worked with Representative Posey and we launched the caucus. Today, our bipartisan Florida ports caucus continues now with Mister Herodopoulos, as my co-chair. Now, twelve years after Werder, twenty fourteen, We see her having passed a bipartisan word uh into law every single Congress since twenty fourteen I've seen the spirit of our partisanship ensure that we can tackle big goals. In Florida, we have seen the importance of word up as we watched the creation of the comprehensive Everglades restoration plant in word uh two thousand. And we saw we see how far we have come in the last twenty-six years. And in this quarter, I continue to see the commitment to the Everglades. We see additional commitments to the Everglades, including authorizations for the Lake Okeechobee Watershed restoration and the Central Everglades planning project. I see commitments for both of my counties. with the Broward County Back Bay study, the Central and Southern Florida flood resiliency efforts, and an authorization for North Miami. And I saw commitments to my port with both Port Everglades and Port Miami, seeing key commitments in this bill. This word uh delivers for all communities, large, small, Rural and urban. In this bill, we are authorizing the next generation of projects and studies. We are addressing affordability by supporting our economically disadvantaged communities. And we are actively addressing the res- resiliency needs that we are seeing nationwide. As this will be my last word on I am extremely grateful for this committee. Being a member of TNI has allowed me to deliver for my community. As this committee plans for the next quarter, both data centers and PFAS must be in focus. Around the country, we are seeing water resources at risk due to major data center construction. And with PFAS, the forever chemicals, we cannot continue to allow new forever chemicals while attempting to improve our environment. Still, I want to thank you all for this successful bill. And, Mister Chair, I yield back.

1:22:39 – 1:22:42

General Lady Yields, Mister Fuller is recognized.

1:22:44 – 1:24:42

Thank you, Mister Chairman. Chairman Graves, ranking member Larson, Chairman Collins, Ranking Member Wilson, and and colleagues, thank you for your leadership on maintaining the regular two-year water cycle. I speak today in support of sections one O one B and one thirty-two, two provisions that elevate the role of water supply within the US Army Corps of Engineer engineers. As our home state of Georgia has seen during its growth in recent years, reliable water supply from core reser- reservoirs isn't a nice to have, it's a must-have. Um, Allatoona Lake and Lake the Lake Lanier districts and my district in our state have provided the foundation for our continued growth. These provisions help ensure the Corps has the tools to support growing communities, strengthen our economy, and secure America's water future. Unfortunately, Corps projects in recent years haven't been found been known for their speed. These provisions help change that. Section one O one B creates a dedicated office of water supply, water conservation, and drought resiliency. Section one thirty-two reinforces the need to maximize the use of existing authorities, while explicitly recognizing municipal, industrial, and agricultural water supply, water conservation, and drought resiliency alongside the Corps' other missions. Together, these sections help turn WADA twenty twenty-four into action. They elevate water supply and the national conference conversation. make the Corps a better partner to communities across the country, and ensure we're using every available tool to strengthen American prosperity. We all rely on the staff here, and I appreciate Ryan Hamilton and his team at Water Resources and Nick Christensen and the full committee staff. I thank both Chairman Graves and the ra- and Ranking Member Larson for their bipartisan leadership, and I urge my colleagues to support these important provisions. Mr. Chairman, I yield back.

1:24:44 – 1:24:46

The gentleman yields. Miss Poe is recognized.

1:24:47 – 1:28:05

Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Ranking Member Larson, and committee staff for your work to bring this uh legislation before us today. I strongly support this bill. Whether it's flooding, pollution, or treating wastewater, water policy impacts everyone. This is why it is vital that we pass reauthorization, which provides over six billion dollars in critical water investment. This bill provides funding for flood mitigation, environmental cleanup and wastewater management, all issues that are critical in for New Jersey. This bill also includes my cleanup act, contaminated waterways like the Lower Saddle River Basin in my district, has long been avoided by the Army Corps of Engineers through federal help is absolutely desperately needed. My cleanup act allows the Army Corps of Engineers to finally tackle contaminated waterways so long as the projects comply with EPA's plan for each site. The flooding has continued too long, and I am proud that my bill will help resolve this while protecting our community and the conservation of our natural water uh waste. At the same time, this broader bill will also direct the Army Corps of Engineers to speed up the flood flood controls and mitigation projects for at least eight projects in my district. In addition to expediting projects in the city of Clifton and the Hackensack Meadowlands as well. I am also excited that we were able to include the in the manager's amendment, the Hat's East Riser construction authorization. This is a critical flood risk reduction project for New Jersey, and I am glad that we were able to secure this win. Prioritizing delayed projects like these in communities, Struggling with flooding is essential for families and businesses living with this threat. Additionally, today we are establishing a new office of water supply, conservation and drought resiliency, which will help the roughly seven point three million New Jerseyans in drought prone areas. This office will increase water supply, bolster an uh emergency drought, operations and connect state and local governments to federal funding. For towns like mine with schools and homes bordering Passaic and Hackensack rivers, they know that when storms roll through, rivers surge, water levels rise, and it is ultimately residents who pay the price. This bill is a strong first step to make sure this doesn't keep happening. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I yield back.

1:28:07 – 1:28:09

General Lady yields. Mister Gallagher is recognized.

1:28:11 – 1:34:02

Yes, thank you, Mr. Chairman. Uh, it is my honor to support this word of the day, uh, as this is exactly why I came to Congress in the first place, to put a real focus on the rural communities of Northern California. Uh, it also highlights the real need to have representation, true representation in in Northern California, so that these many communities have that focus and have real results. Someone who knows the issues and who lives and breathes the Sacramento Valley. Doug LaMalfa was that man, and I am happy to continue that work, uh, in in this role. Uh, at the heart of Northern California, the lifeblood is the Sacramento River, uh which I grew up on. I grew up fishing those waters. Uh, our farm relied on those waters to irrigate our crops. Um, and this WERDA helps invest one hundred and fifty-five million dollars in that Sacramento River Basin, much needed projects, uh from water and waste water infrastructure that will help support water reliability, certainty that we will have that water in the future. Uh, because all too often in California our water rights are under attack. In fact, they currently are uh by the California government, by the Water Resources Control Board, by regulations. But this WERDA helps ensure those co-equal goals of ensuring water reliability and environmental restoration and sustainability on the Sacré-Vivre are met by authorizing these investments. It also ensures surface water protection and long overdue upgrades in our rural communities. One of those rural communities is the town of Robins. Uh, most people probably wouldn't be able to pick it out on a map, but it's an important community. It's one of these small rural communities that needs investments. I started working with that community when I was a county supervisor. Today, this word helps ensure wastewater uh sewer line replacement can happen in that community. Much, much needed. uh and for rural communities across the state of California, across this great nation who need that investment. This bill directs the Corps to begin forecast informed reservoir operations. What does that mean? It means better management of our water by ensuring that when we operate our dams and reservoirs, we're ensuring that we're using the latest technology and weather forecasting to ensure that we store as much of that water as possible but also to be ready for releases when we have uh a large snowpack that could threaten communities downstream, as happened with Oroville Dam uh when we had a very wet season and that dam fell apart. This WERDA helps ensure that won't happen again, that we won't have those kinds of issues because it is making an investment, for instance, in Black Butte Dam to ensure that those dam safety reviews, are done on time and timely to ensure that our existing infra- infrastructure, one, is maintained, but it's also operated to the maximum ability to make sure that we have water when we need it. I'm also proud that this WERDA ensures that that lifeblood will be there for the great crops of Northern California. I heard my colleague talk about some of the crops uh in her district, but peaches, prunes, walnuts, almonds, rice, tomatoes, alfalfa, all grown in that great northern California, uh that the world relies upon. Uh we, this WERDA helps ensure that that investment maintains, and that doesn't just help my district, it helps people across this great world, uh have food and nourishment, uh now and into the future. Um, I also wanna highlight that this, this WERDA puts a focus on wildfire and on drought resiliency. Uh, we have had countless wildfires, uh, in Northern California. All over this word uh is is a focus on wildfire, on resiliency, on ensuring, um, that we have drought relief as well, that we put a focus on making sure that we can be more resilient in droughts, in these dry conditions. Uh, so many different fronts where this word of bill helps insure investments uh in my district, but certainly throughout this great nation. And what I wanna thank the chairman and the ranking member for is, is to, is for making those investments, for hearing from all of us, but from hearing from this representative from Northern California, where many, for where where all too often we are overlooked, uh, and and especially by our state government many times. Uh, but by having a voice here in this building, by having a true representative, we're able to secure these investments in rural California. And I, I am greatly thankful for this. This, this order reflects what this committee does best. Practical, community-driven solutions that strengthen infrastructure, that improve resiliency, and deliver real value to the people we represent. So I thank you, Mister Chairman. Um. and and the ranking member and all the subcommittee chairs and staff who have put their work into this package. I'm proud to support it and I look forward to continuing to work with you as we advance WERDA and the rest of the committee's agenda this coming year. Thank you and I yield back my time.

1:34:04 – 1:34:07

Gentlemen, his time's expired, this chair recognizes Mister Figures.

1:34:08 – 1:39:08

Thank you, Mister Chair, and thank you to Chairman Graves, Ranking Member Larson, Chairman Collins, and Ranking Member Wilson for spearheading uh, as my colleague, uh, Representative Gallagher, uh, just mentioned, uh, what is best about this committee. Uh, this bill, uh, is a reflection of just that. Uh, look, WERDA has long been one of Congress's best examples of bipartisan legislation and I appreciate the committee's continuing of that tradition, uh, here in my first term. For Alabama's second congressional district, this bill invests in water infrastructure initiatives that will help the Army Corps and our state and local partners continue to uh strengthen our economy. Um, I uh, I have the privilege now of representing uh the city of Mobile, uh, which is now home to the l- deepest port uh in the Gulf after a recent dredging uh project w- was recently completed. And with that, um, the port already generates uh nearly one hundred billion dollars annually in economic activity um for the state of Alabama, and that is only going to increase with the port's uh new capacity. And so now more than ever, uh, it is critical uh that we are here making the uh necessary investments uh in sustaining not just the port um but all of our water resource needs across the district uh that's why I was uh very happy to be able to secure uh provisions that authorizes nearly fifty million dollars or approximately fifty million dollars in critical water and wastewater infrastructure improvements uh across my district as a whole this will be in counties like Barber and Bullock and Butler and Crenshaw and Macon and Montgomery County Pike County Russell County. Uh this responds to urgent water infrastructure the district and the surrounding region. Uh, this will be funds that will be able to be utilized to help address, uh, the water challenges, the persistent water challenges in Pritchard, Alabama, uh, which residents there, they - they - they lose sixty percent of their fresh drinking water before it ever reaches a tap. Uh, and so being able to secure resources to help fix that issue is something that is necessary and something that we are pleased to be able to do. Uh, but also persistent storm water management issues across the district and critical water and infrastructure. uh needs in places like Bullock and Butler uh counties and and some significant sewer issues that we have in my district. Uh I have parts of my district uh that are too rural for public sewer service, yet the soil concentration is too dense for traditional septic systems to work. Uh and so what that leads to is is is people literally running sewer lines out into the woods. Uh and as primitive as that sounds, it is something that is uh pervasive across uh not just my district but adjoining in the state of Alabama. So addressing those issues due to the health and environmental concerns raised by them is something that is significantly important uh and something that we're uh grateful to be able to do. Uh we're also able to secure um investments in studies, uh studies that will help uh uh hopefully put us on the pathway to righting some historical wrongs uh in issues that have long been uh overdue to be addressed in in in this district uh one of them is a study to identify the source of contamination affecting wa- the water surrounding the Africatown community. Uh, for people that are not familiar with the Africatown, listen, uh, the Clotilda was the last known slave ship to arrive in the United States of America over five decades after the slave trade had been banned uh and this community is where some of those survivors um set up after uh after the Civil War it has long been plagued with industry uh that has developed in that area and in fact uh that part of um the community now is incorporated into the city of Mobile. Um, one of the issues uh that led to people supporting incorporation efforts back in nineteen sixty was that well water was already contaminated then. Um, and so being incentivized to get onto the city's public water uh source even back in nineteen sixty. So these same issues that we're addressing now. And one of the studies that we've authorized is being able to determine uh the sources of contamination in the public water surrounding the Africatown communi- uh, community because there are still persistent warnings not to consume fish uh from the public waters that surround that community. And so uh figuring that out will hopefully uh allow us to to write some environmental injustices that have been happening there for far too long, uh but also a study to evaluate dredge material placement into Pinto Island and Blakely Island. Um listen, we are um also very, very happy uh to secure a provision in this uh year's uh word uh that will effectively stop the dumping of thin-layer dredged material into Mobile Bay. Um, this is the process where dredged material to keep the port depth, uh, where it's supposed to be, uh, is has literally just been spread into the bay. And - and any outdoorsman knows that that is a threat to wildlife, it's a threat to fishing, oysters, uh, and just general outdoors enj- enjoyment. And so being able to have the opportunity here in this bill, uh, to effectively ban that practice, uh, is something that is - that is very important to us locally in the Mobile Bay Area, uh, and something that is just good practice. And so Uh, I'm looking forward to uh supporting this building. I encourage my colleagues to do the same. Thank you, Mister Chair, and I yield back.

1:39:09 – 1:39:11

Gentleman yields. Chair recognizes Mister Burleson.

1:39:14 – 1:43:04

Thank you, Mister Chairman. I'm very grateful to be on this committee, and particularly the water subcommittee. Because I don't, I've been able to deliver wins for my district, um, that have taken years and years in effort. The the Water Resources Development Act is especially important to my district because it includes a provision that provides certainty for the hardworking property owners around Lake Tenecomo and Table Rock Lake in Missouri and Arkansas. Table Rock Lake is more than just a body of water, it is a treasured landmark in Southwest Missouri and a crown jewel of the Ozarks. Home to generational family homes, vacation cabins and retirement homes, that have been a part of this community for decades. Unfortunately for many of these homeowners, living on a core managed lake has caused unnecessary challenges and headaches. Some property owners, through no fault of their own, built portions of their homes or placed their septic systems on core land due to unclear property lines at the time of the construction and purchase. Decades later, with satellite imaging, they were informed that the corps, by the corps, that they must demolish or relocate these structures, a process that would have been both expensive and deeply disruptive to their lives. I've literally been in the homes of retirees who put their entire retirement fortune into a beautiful property on, sitting over the lake, only to find out that they have to spend more than the entire value of their home just in these um in in in um these costs. As one can imagine, relocating a septic system which costs hundreds of thousands of dollars or in some cases relocating part of their entire home is not a simple undertaking. For some of these constituents, the cost of compliance was estimated to be hundreds of thousands of dollars. And to address this, last Congress I secured language in the word of Bill to protect these homeowners from this kind of undue hardship, without affecting any lake levels whatsoever. However, the bill was enacted and after the bill was enacted, the Corps adopted a very narrow interpretation, literally telling the attorneys of this staff of this committee and the Senate staff committee that they disagreed with our attorney's interpretation of the provisions of a language, which left many of my constituents in the same position that they were before the passage. After working closely with the assistant secretary of the Army Corps, Civil Works Adam Tell and his team, we developed a more comprehensive and durable solution to address these issues without provok provoking undue hardship on these homeowners. Section two two seven and two two eight of this legislation build upon section thirteen twenty-three of Thomas R. Carpenter or Carper Water Resource Development Act to make Congress's intent unmistakably clear. These provisions ensure that the structures and septic systems that homeowners have long relied upon can remain on core managed land providing certainty for families while preserving the integrity of the lake and its project. And I wanna thank, I wanna deeply thank Chairman Graves and Chairman Collins for their dedication to this issue and for their commitment to it advocating for Missourians while ensuring a lasting and reasonable solution. I also wanna thank Assistant Secretary Tell, General Graham and General Walter of the Southwestern Division for working with me to develop a solution that protects homeowners while ensuring the integrity of the Corps' mission. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I yield back.

1:43:07 – 1:43:08

Mr. Stauber.

1:43:09 – 1:47:10

Uh, thank you, Mr. Chair, I rise in support of the Water Resources Development Act of twenty twenty six. I want to start by thanking the Chairman uh, Chairman Graves and Ranking Member Larson for their leadership on this bipartisan legislation. Army Corps projects are especially critical to the Great Lakes maritime economy. The Great Lakes generate three point one trillion dollars in gross domestic product and employ roughly twenty-five point eight million people. The Port of Duluth Superior and the Sulox transport millions of tons of Ameri- of American mine taconite and iron ore every year, ensuring that the water infrastructure in this region can support such commerce is essential to both our economy and our strategic national security. Further, Minnesotans fish, recreate and spend time with their loved ones in lakes throughout the eighth district. These hallowed places are part of our way of life. It is important that they are maintained so future generations can enjoy all they have to offer. WERDA twenty twenty six uh dutifully recognizes these realities. However, I especially appreciate the inclusion of several priorities advanced by my office. First, This legislation includes language requiring the Corps to establish a shoreline management plan for Big Sandy Lake in my district. Corps activities involving surveying and boundary stakes have sparked title disputes in this area. This provision will ensure that the Corps works closely with local stakeholders to determine the best use of this land while developing a means for landowners to purchase certain federally owned parcels in the future. Second, the bill requires the core employees who operate, repair or maintain lock and dam equipment at the Soo Locks, be paid from the special wage rate schedule. This provision will help this important asset recruit and retain dedicated skilled employees who keep commodities moving throughout the Great Lakes. Finally, word of twenty twenty-six includes fifty-six million dollars for the Northeastern Minnesota Environmental Infrastructure program. an essential program that assists non-federal interests in northern Minnesota. This includes the counties of Cook, Lake, St. Louis, Cochichang, Itasca, Cass, Crow Wing, Aiken, Carleton, Pine, Kenebec, Mille Lacs, Ossantee, and Chisago in my district. Importantly, this section of the bill updates section five sixty-nine of the word of n- nineteen ninety-nine to expand eligibility for Environmental Infrastruct- Infrastructure Assistant in northeastern Minnesota to include Lake of the Woods County. When the provision was originally enacted, the eligible counties aligned with boundaries of Minnesota's eighth congressional district. Following twenty twenty-two redistricting, however, Lake of the Woods County became part of current Minnesota eight leaving the statutory language outdated. This technical correction has significant real world consequences. The city of Budette is working to replace failing water and sewer infrastructure serving the county's only affordable housing development. Despite years of coordination among the city, its Housing and Redevelopment Authority, engineers, funding partners and regulators, the project has faced repeated delays. Ongoing sew sewer failures and backups have forced some housing units to be vacated even as more than twenty families remain on a waiting list for affordable housing. By restoring Lake of the Woods County's eligibility, this provision re-establishes the legal authority needed Corps to move forward with a partnership agreement and construction, helping deliver reliable infrastructure and expand access to safe affordable housing for the families who need it. Overall, this bill takes meaningful steps to help the Corps expedite projects, deliver on time for our constituents, and reduce the bloated bureaucracy that kills progress. It makes meaningful investments that support our infrastructure and economy while making sure those funds

1:47:28 – 1:47:39

Anyone else wish to be heard on? The bill? Seeing no one, we're now considering the bill for amendments, and I recognize myself

Clerk1:47:44 – 1:47:49

A manager's amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute to H R nine four nine seven, offered by Chairman Graves.

1:47:50 – 1:48:22

Without rejection, the amendment will be considered as read, and I recognize myself real quick for a statement. The manager's amendment makes various technical corrections and some conforming changes to the bill. It incorporates more than twenty-five amendments filed by members that were agreed to through bipartisan collaboration between ranking member Larson and myself. And I wanna thank Rick for working with me on uh this package, and I would also like to thank all the members whose amendments were incorporated. Um with that, I yield back and recognize uh Mr. Guermendi for his statement.

1:48:23 – 1:48:53

Uh thank you, Mr. Chairman. Uh it's the Ranking Member, Lawson, and I support the Manager's amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute. The Manager's amendment includes over thirty amendments that were filed and then negotiated and added to the bill, as well as several technical corrections. Importantly, this package also includes six new projects for construction authorization that the Corps submitted to Congress since the introduction of the base bill. With that, I yield back.

1:48:55 – 1:48:56

Mr. Van Drew.

1:48:59 – 1:53:18

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I rise today in strong support of the manager's amendment. Before I begin, I want to thank Chairman Graves, Ranking Member Larson, and the outstanding team on Transportation Infrastructure for their tireless work on this bipartisan word of bill in general. And for including several priorities that are so important to the State of New Jersey and the United States of America and particularly to coastal communities across this great country. First, I'm glad to see the inclusion of language to address one of the most persistent challenges facing our coast. hot spot erosion. For years, the Army Corps has watched places like the north end of Atlantic City, where we continue placing millions of cubic yards of sand on our beaches, only to watch much of it washed away later, literally in the same season. This is not a long-term solution. It's an expensive cycle that costs taxpayers millions of dollars, while still leaving communities vulnerable, and not curing the situation. The language included in the manager's amendment ensures the court can fully evaluate the engineering solutions needed to address these chronic erosion problems, so we fix the underlying clause. Instead of simply replacing the same sand over and over and over again. This means better protection for our communities and significant savings for taxpayers over the long term. That's a great combination. The manager's amendment also helps protect one of New Jersey's greatest historic treasures, the East Point Lighthouse. By expanding the ongoing Morris River feasibility study to include the lighthouse in surrounding shoreline erosion, the Corps can evaluate long-term solutions to preserve this irreplaceable piece of America's maritime history before we lose it, and it's too late. I've been working for for years with my friend and colleague, Congresswoman Dina Titus, to address dam safety, and I'm very happy to see our dams act, including in the underlying bill. I know she is as well. It's also s- great to see an additional provision, included in the management amendment that f- that directs FEMA to evaluate how high hazard potential dam projects are prioritized. Ladies and gentlemen, this is a serious business and it's important for the safety of our nation. Communities deserve confidence that limited resources are being directed where they will be provide the greatest absolute benefit to public safety. Hearing directly from the states and identifying ways to improve that process is just simply good efficient government. Finally, I appreciate the inclusion of my provision with my friend Congresswoman Laura Gillen to study the creation of a coastal storm risk management trust fund. We need an ultimate cure and a real, solvable situation, I believe, if we do it the right way. Our coastal infrastructure is our first line of defense, protecting homes, businesses, critical infrastructure, and local economies. We need a dedicated, reliable funding, permanent funding source, let me put that word in there, permanent funding source to strengthen these projects before disais- disaster strikes, not after disaster strikes. Mister Chairman, this manager's amendment reflects exactly what Werder should be about. Practical solutions, fiscal responsibility, real infrastructure, stronger infrastructure, safer communities, and preserving the places that define our nation. Again, I thank Chairman Graves, Ranking Member Larson, my legislative partners, Reps Titus and Gillen, and the committee staff for all the amazing hard work they do, and for their partnership, all of us together. I strongly urge my colleagues to support the Manager's Amendment. And, Mr. Chairman, I yield back.

1:53:20 – 1:53:20

Ms. Gillen.

1:53:23 – 1:56:35

Uh, thank you, Chairman Graves and Ranking Member Larson, for holding this up in for your bipartisan collaboration on this very important twenty twenty six water resources development act i'm proud to support the bill and the underlying manager's amendment which includes language I secured to expedite the crucial Nassau County Back Bay's coastal storm ricks management project to protect Long Island's south shore from flooding mister chairman hurricane sandy devastated Long Island and our communities in New York's fourth congressional district causing billions of dollars worth of damage. As we deal with rising sea levels and stronger, more frequent storms, we must provide the coastal communities I represent with the federal resources we need to enhance our resiliency and protect our residents and our property. For a decade, the Army Corps has been engaged in a study to examine how we can reduce storm damage, flooding and coastal erosion in Nassau County's back bays. Some of the most vulnerable areas, Freeport, East Rockaway, Oceanside, Island Park, the five towns, Long Beach, Lido Beach, Point Lookout lie within this area and deal with severe flooding on a regular basis. As supervisor of the town of Hempstead, I fought to keep federal dollars flowing to this project and to support resiliency of our coastal communities. In twenty twenty one, the Army Corps released a draft report with recommendations to reduce the risk of flood damage. However, since twenty twenty one The Army Corps has not completed the final feasibility study, nor has it issued the chief's report, the crucial steps necessary to begin the next stage towards construction. My amendment would require the Army Corps to report on the current status of the project and to expedite and advance this crucial project, one step further to protect us from the next storm. I'd also like to take a moment to highlight some other major wins for Long Island in this package that I was proud to help secure. These include eleven million dollars for Garden City to address lead pipe replacement, twenty-five million dollars for water main upgrades in Long Beach, three point three million dollars for storm water pumps in Freeport, a hundred and thirty thousand for flood mitigation in Lawrence, and tens of millions more for water and wastewater infrastructure across Nassau County. This bill also authorizes new studies to mitigate flooding in Reynolds Channel and Atlantic Beach, to dredge Bannister Bay and Lawrence. And I am proud that this package includes my bipartisan pill, the Coastal Infrastructure Improvement Act, which would authorize the Army Corps to carry out research and development on innovative coastal erosion technologies to protect our environment, prevent erosion, and save taxpayers' dollars. Thank you so much to my Republican colleague, Mister Van Drew, for working with me on this very important legislation. Mister Chairman, together these investments and policy proposals represent a comprehensive commitment to Long Island and to the South Shore's water infrastructure and coastal resilience. In closing, I encourage all of my colleagues to join me in supporting the Manager's Amendment and the underlying legislation and with that I yield back.

1:56:35 – 1:56:39

And a light of yields. Do you recognize Mister Brian Mask? Five minutes.

1:56:40 – 2:01:42

Thank you, Mister Chairman. Uh, Mister Chairman, we've worked a lot on this committee to deal with South Florida, Washington, and I think we can reflect back and say that for over a century, the water management in South Florida was an absolute disaster. For Lake Okeechobee, for the Florida Everglades, for the estuaries on the east and west coastlines of the state, it killed wildlife, it triggered public health emergencies, shut down businesses up and down my Treasure Coast area. It was a disaster. And so what did this committee do? This committee has gone to work year after year on the Water Resource Development Act to to find ways to to mitigate and fix these problems. In two thousand seventeen, we secured a hundred and fifty million dollars for Everglades restoration as we went into the appropriation cycle. Uh, eighty-two million to rehabilitate the Herbert Hoover dike so that the Corps of Engineers couldn't go and tell us every single year that this dike may fail so we have to dump this dirty, toxic water on you. And we delivered seventy six and a half million for the South Florida ecosystem restoration to to help repair the damage done to the Florida Everglades. And we put money behind restoring the Kissimmee River, which long before any of us was here, the US Army took a a river that l- snaked like a river and they turned it into a channel, uh again destroying a another ecosystem. And we undid that damage and made it look like a river again. And in two thousand and nineteen we delivered sixty million to raise up the Tamiami Trail so that water could flow south uh you know into the Everglades where it belongs. We year after year, just more and more work, we worked uh to redo the the broken management plan known as uh the the Lake Okeechobee regulation schedule and and moved towards a new one called the Lake Okeechobee System Operating Manual. Just year after year through this committee, we have worked to fix the water issues uh of South Florida. And this year with President Trump's support, we delivered the highest ever uh, Everglades restoration. So I'm thankful to everybody's work, uh, for for dealing with these issues. Now, back in two thousand and eighteen, when we drafted the same bill, I pushed the Army Corps to write a new rule book, which I just mentioned, uh, for how they manage water in Lake Okeechobee. It's called the Lake Okeechobee System Operating Manual, or LOSEM. And the whole point of that was to get the Corps to stop dumping lake water into our east and west coast estuaries like the St. Lucie River. Now, why? The St. Lucie is a saltwater estuary. It's salt. And the seagrass is different than the seagrass in the lake, in the freshwater lake. And when the core dispenses all of that fresh lake water into the saltwater estuaries, the seagrass dies. And as the seagrass dies, the ecosystems follow and they die as well. And Losem was supposed to prevent that from happening any longer. But seagrass grows in Lake Okeechobee, as I said, like I said, a different kind, fresh water seagrass. And in that management plan, they put in something known as lake recovery operations. And that was just a justification to again dump the fresh water from Lake Okeechobee out into the coastal estuary. Uh, and and there's only one way to lower that lake, and it's to dump water out of it. And when that water has to go somewhere, they open up a levee, separating the lake from the St. Lucie River on my coast as an example, and they pumped that water out. So the core floods are estuaries for a patch of grass in the lake, a different kind of grass. And on the other side of the levee, they kill off acres of seagrass that we're not looking for that fresh water that it kills off. This is exactly what the new rule book was written to stop, but it's still taking place. So. What does my amendment do? It makes the Corps come back and show us their work. Why did they pull the trigger? When did they pull the trigger? How much water went through each structure? And where did it go? And did it actually recover seagrass that it was supposed to? Or did it do more harm than good? Because it makes no sense to grow grass in the lake if you're killing off even more grass on the other side of the levee. Uh, this is robbing Peter to pay Paul and it should make no sense to So I'm grateful this was included in the manager's amendment, and I wanna thank the chairman for working with me on it. I also wanna thank uh for the work on the Atlantic intercoastal waterway, uh one of the most important inland navigation routes in the country, uh the Jupiter inlet. Uh we are doing an examination to study should the Jupiter inlet be a part of that that intercoastal waterway system. Uh it is a a huge system for marine navigation across our area, and I wanna thank the committee for working on a provision to examine adding that to the intercoastal waterway system as well, very important for my community, uh, and I thank the committee for the work on it. Mister Chairman, I yield back.

2:01:42 – 2:02:03

Gentlemen yields, are there any other speakers on this amendment? Seeing none, are there amendments to the amendment? Seeing none, the question is on the amendment. All those in favor, signify by saying aye. All those opposed, signify by saying nay. The ayes have it and the amendment is agreed to.

2:02:20 – 2:02:21

All right.

2:02:23 – 2:02:29

We're now considering the bill for amendments. What purpose does Mister Stanton seek recognition?

2:02:29 – 2:02:32

Mister Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.

2:02:32 – 2:02:34

The clerk will designate the amendment.

Clerk2:02:35 – 2:02:41

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute to H R nine four nine seven, offered by Mister Stanton, number one two five.

2:02:41 – 2:02:48

Without objection, the amendment will be considered as read. Mister Stantman is recognized for five minutes to speak on his amendment.

2:02:48 – 2:04:55

This amendment would reduce the non-federal costs share down to ten percent for economically disadvantaged communities Under the section five nine five Western Rural Water Program, increasing access to this program to those who need it most. This isn't a handout, this is establishing parity, equal treatment for communities across environmental infrastructure programs. We've done this before in a bipartisan fashion. Word of twenty twenty four lowered non-federal cost share for Ohio and North Dakota, and parts of Virginia, Missouri, California, and Washington State. There's a great need for water infrastructure investments in Arizona and the rest of the Western States. Our small, rural, and tribal communities often have the greatest needs but the fewest financial resources. Like the city of Globe, Arizona, which suffered a devastating flood last fall but never received an emergency declaration. This left a small town surrounded by federal land, unable to raise millions to rebuild their downtown and repair the stormwater infrastructure to prevent future flooding disasters. A twenty-five percent federal match is a heavy lift for Globe and many others. I've heard time and time again for local leaders that the cost share can be the difference between moving a worthy project forward or leaving an infra- infrastructure need unmet. Uh, Cha- Chairman Ucapasillo of the Pasquayacui tribe in Arizona previously testified before this committee. While they were able to break ground on a critical water supply project through my En- Arizona Environmental Infrastructure Authority the tribe called this committee's attention to the fact that only a small number of tribes in EI eligible states have applied for, and received aid through the program. These programs are essential to securing reliable water supplies, but still, too few tribes and disadvantaged communities can overcome the financial barriers. As wor- wor- negotiations continue with the Senate, I urge my colleagues to join me in recognizing the need for parity across the programs and support the addressing the barri- these barriers that every eligible community can participate. Thank you very much. Now, out of respect for the bipartisan agreement made between the chair and the ranking member, and some slight arm twisting by the raking member, I will withdraw my amendment.

2:04:55 – 2:04:56

Without objection.

2:04:56 – 2:05:04

Without objection. For what purpose does Mister Crawford seek recognition?

2:05:05 – 2:05:06

I have an amendment at the desk.

2:05:06 – 2:05:08

The clerk will designate the amendment.

Clerk2:05:08 – 2:05:15

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute to H R nine four nine seven, offered by Mister Crawford, number zero seven four.

2:05:15 – 2:05:20

Without objection, the amendment will be considered as read, Mister Crawford is recognized for five minutes

2:05:21 – 2:08:21

Thank you, Mister Chairman, and we'll start by thanking you and the staff and your leadership of helping move certain counties within my district out of Little Rock district to the Memphis and Dixburg districts. This is an important step forward as it lays the groundwork for ultimately placing the Little Rock district under the Mississippi Valley division where its mission and responsibilities are more appropriately aligned. My amendment is common sense and practical. It specifically focuses on the Mississippi River Basin and proper leadership within the basin. The realignment of the Little Rock district from the Southwestern division to the Valley Division is a logical and strategic decision that will strengthen mission mission execution without creating adverse effects. This proposal does not alter the mission of Little Rock District, its workforce, its responsibilities, or its policies. The only change being made is transferring operational oversight to a core division that is more closely aligned with the district's day-to-day mission. The Little Rock District's civil works portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to the Mississippi River Basin. Majority of the district civil works' responsibilities involve managing the Arkansas River, the White River, and numerous other rivers and tributaries that directly influence the Mississippi River system. These waterways don't operate independently. They function as one interconnected watershed that requires coordinated planning, water management, navigation, flood risk reduction, and ecosystem restoration. Because these river systems are so interconnected, decisions made on one portion of the basin frequently affect conditions elsewhere. Managing managing them effectively requires unity of effort across the entire watershed. The Mississippi Valley Division was created with the exact mission in mind. It possessions it it possesses the institutional knowledge, technical expertise, and operational focus necessary to oversee the Mississippi River and its tributaries as one integrated system. By placing the Little Rock District under the Mississippi Valley Division, the Corps would improve coordination, streamline decision making, and strengthen management of the entire basin. In contrast, the Southwestern Division's primary operational focus is centered on the watersheds such as the Brazos River, and the Rio Grande, and other Southwestern River systems, not the Mississippi River and its tributaries. While those missions are critically important as well, they are fundamentally different from the operational challenges associated with the Mississippi River Basin. Realigning the Little Rock District would ensure that operational priorities, hydraulic management, navigation responsibilities, and flood risk management are overseen by a division that specializes in those areas within the Mississippi River watershed. In the end, the mis- missions remain the same, the people remain the same, the policies stay the same. The only thing that changes is placing the Little Rock District under the division whose mission priorities and expertise are already centered on the watershed it serves every day. That said, although this policy change is necessary and provides significant benefits not only to my constituents in the state of Arkansas, but to the entire Mississippi River system and the Corps of Engineers, I will be withdrawing the amendment. I will remain committed to working with the Chairman and Ranking Member to advance this important realignment and that said, I will yield back.

2:08:22 – 2:08:36

Without objection. The amendment is withdrawn. What purpose does Mister Davi- Miss Davis seek recognition?

2:08:38 – 2:08:40

Uh, Mister Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.

2:08:40 – 2:08:42

The clerk will designate the amendment.

Clerk2:08:43 – 2:08:49

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute to H R nine four nine seven, offered by Miss Davids, number zero seven eight.

2:08:50 – 2:08:56

Without objection, the amendment will be considered as read. Miss Davids is recognized for five minutes to speak on her amendment.

2:08:57 – 2:10:23

Thank you, Mister Chairman. Uh, as many know, engineering and architectural services are critical to the work of the US Army Corps of Engineers. These professionals provide essential services, production and delivery of designs, plans, drawings, and specifications for public works and utilities. The Corps relies on private sector engineering companies like those in Kansas City to support their internal capacity and provide specialized skills. A six percent fee limitation for architectural and engineering services on federal projects was first introduced in nineteen thirty-nine as a cost control measure to support the nation's urgent defense build-up ahead of World War Two. However, I've heard from my constituent companies that the outdated fee cap is not representative of the cost of architecture and engineering which vary greatly depending on the project and scope of services we address this issue through section twenty eight eighty-one of the NDAA for fiscal year twenty twenty four raising the cap to ten percent for the departments of army navy and air force according to some experts this increase better reflects the value of innovation in this space and allows firms to cover the rising costs of labor among other business costs. I'd like to commend the committee for including a GAO study in the base text of this bill to analyze this issue, but I offer this amendment to create parity with a law we've already passed. Parity, our constituent companies have told us they need to remain competitive. Mister Chairman, I yield back.

2:10:25 – 2:10:29

You have a lot of yields? Did you offer withdrawal?

2:10:32 – 2:10:32

Mm.

2:10:33 – 2:10:41

uh mister chairman i i plan to withdraw the amendment but um would certainly love to have the committee's assurances that we can keep working on this issue

2:10:41 – 2:10:43

absolutely without objection

2:10:42 – 2:10:45

thank you mister chairman i i withdraw my amendment and yield back

2:10:45 – 2:10:46

without objection

2:11:06 – 2:11:06

Five minutes.

2:11:06 – 2:11:07

Who?

2:11:07 – 2:11:08

Miss Poe.

2:11:08 – 2:11:11

Without objection, Miss Poe, will you recognize for five minutes?

2:11:13 – 2:12:45

Thank you, Mister Chairman, um, first I want to take this opportunity to thank my colleague from Kansas for offering this amendment. When Congress puts a fee cap on architectural and engineering services for federal projects, It was in nineteen thirty nine, nearly ninety years ago. Like the times, themselves engineering and architectural efforts were a bit simpler back then. But today we're in a more complex world which requires more complex engineering and planning. I understand that the defense department has has increased the engineering feed limitations to ten percent in the military setting above the six percent that currently applies to the cores. and civil uh work projects. While we appreciate that the committee included language to study this disparity, this amendment would put a finer point on ensuring fairness and balance. We want to ensure that the Army Corps can access high quality innovative design and planning mitigating risks later uh while also improving performance in the life cycle of needed projects. I am committed to working with Representative Davis uh and the committee on this issue in addressing disparity for our engineers. Our communities rightly want high quality project designs with high returns on investment. Thank you, Mister Chairman. I yield back.

2:12:46 – 2:12:49

General, uh yields, for what purpose does Miss Strickland seek recognition?

2:12:50 – 2:12:52

Mister Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.

2:12:52 – 2:12:54

The clerk will designate the amendment.

Clerk2:12:55 – 2:13:01

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute to H R nine four nine seven, offered by Miss Strickland, number zero eight nine.

2:13:01 – 2:13:07

Without objection, the amendment will be considered as read. Miss Strickland is recognized for five minutes to speak on her amendment.

2:13:08 – 2:16:03

Thank you, Mister Chairman, this amendment authorizes the Northwest Regional Commission, which Congress already funded in the fiscal year twenty twenty-six appropriations law. This commission will help deliver critical infrastructure and drive economic development in distressed communities across the states of Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and Montana. It focuses on rural communities. As many members of this committee know, regional commissions are not new. They already exist. So far we have the Appalachian Regional Commission, Delta Regional Authority, Denali Commission, Northern Border Regional Commission, Southwest Border Regional Commission, to name a few. A January twenty twenty-five report from the Brookings Institution found that regional commissions are uniquely effective at delivering critical infrastructure in rural underserved communities reaching places that traditional federal programs may struggle to serve and doing so with modest budgets. Many communities across Washington State and the Pacific Northwest face long-term economic challenges. They are the hardest hit by the transition away from traditional industries and As you all know, aging infrastructure, such as wastewater systems that are in poor condition or deficient broadband infrastructure is both a contributor to economic distress and an obstacle to growth. It holds back the people who live in those communities. Many of these communities lack the capacity to develop infrastructure projects. They may not have the borrowing capacity or the tax base to finance them and meet matching requirements. Recognizing these challenges, Congress has already appropriated one million dollars to establish a Northwest Regional Commission serving these distressed communities in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and Montana. But because this committee never authorized again, because this committee did not authorize, those funds that Congress approved cannot be spent. My amendment provides the authorization needed to stand up the commission that Congress funded. I'm disappointed that this did not make it past negotiations, and what we heard was that despite evidence to the contrary, regional commissions are in fact money well spent. Congress should not create new commissions. That's what we were told. But Congress has already acknowledged the need for Northwest Regional Commission by already committing money towards it. So instead, this money is sitting idle instead of being put to work for the rural communities that Congress intended to help. Mister Chair, it's unfortunate that there's no path forward for this today, so I'm going to withdraw my amendment, but I encourage my colleagues in the Senate to ensure that this investment can finally reach the communities in the Northwest, especially those who need our help the most. I yield back, Mister Chair.

2:16:04 – 2:16:07

General, I yield, Chair, recognizer, Mister Lawerson, for five minutes.

2:16:07 – 2:17:15

Thank you, Mister Chair. I asked the Chair to um not recognize or offer to withdraw until I bespoke on it um uh representative, but I just want to note this amendment would establish a Northwest Regional Commission to support local economic development in the Pacific Northwest, including Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana. And I support the creation of this commission, uh, that is modeled after existing regional commissions. Uh, such commission would enable states within the Pacific Northwest to fund coordinated economic development initiatives that range from workforce development to salmon habitat restoration. This commission, as noted, has already been funded by uh one million dollars by a previous interior environment appropriations bill. And now Congress needs to pass the authority that will allow the Northwest to access this funding. Unfortunately, this amendment is outside the scope of the Water Resources Development Act. And, uh, therefore, I do need to oppose it pursuant to a Big Four agreement. However, I do want to thank Representative Strickland for her work to advocate for the establishment of this commission and for bringing the matter before us today and we'll have opportunities in the future. to address the uh creation uh of the commission without a yield back.

2:17:15 – 2:17:18

Gentlemen Yales, Miss Strickland, do you still intend to withdraw the amendment?

2:17:20 – 2:17:23

I'll ask my ranking member. Do I intend to withdraw my amendment?

2:17:24 – 2:17:25

Yes, you do.

2:17:25 – 2:17:26

Without objection.

2:17:26 – 2:17:28

Yes, Mr. Chair, I intend to withdraw my amendment.

2:17:28 – 2:17:29

Without objection.

Clerk2:17:29 – 2:17:29

That's good.

2:17:37 – 2:17:40

For what purpose does Mister Babin seek recognition?

2:17:41 – 2:17:43

Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.

2:17:47 – 2:17:49

The clerk will designate the amendment.

Clerk2:17:50 – 2:17:56

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute to HR nine four nine seven, offered by Mr. Babin, number zero three six.

2:17:57 – 2:18:03

Without objection, the amendment will be considered as read. Mr. Babin is recognized for five minutes to speak on his amendment.

2:18:03 – 2:19:51

Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and I want to thank uh not only you, but uh ranking member Larson. for your work uh on this very important legislation. I offer this amendment today to improve how Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund dollars are distributed to our nation's energy transfer ports. The Water Resources Reform and Development Act of twenty fourteen allocated Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund funds to t- energy transfer ports that move millions of tons of energy products through our ports each and every year. The Port of Houston, located in my district, is among the nation's largest energy transfer ports and plays a vital role in America's energy security and economy. Unfortunately, the current allocation formula is based on a per-state distribution rather than on the actual volume of energy commodities that are handled by each port and as a result the ports that handle significantly more energy products are not being treated proportionally under the current law. My amendment would simply provide a more equitable distribution by allocating these funds based on the total energy co- uh commodity tonnage handled at each energy transfer port and ensuring that funding better reflects the critical role that these ports play in supporting our national economy, and our energy dominance. I appreciate the committee's willingness to continue discussing this issue, Mister Chair. Uh, if I can get your commitment to continue the conversation and work with my team to potentially revisit this proposal as Werger continues to move through this legislative process, I will withdraw my amendment for now to avoid delaying this mark-up.

2:19:52 – 2:19:53

No objection.

2:19:53 – 2:19:54

Do I have your

2:19:55 – 2:19:57

Yes, we'll work, yes, yes, we will, we'll work with it.

2:19:55 – 2:20:01

water? Okay, thank you very much. I wanna say thank you and I will withdraw my amendment.

2:20:01 – 2:20:11

Without objection. For what purpose does Mister Boss seek recognition?

2:20:14 – 2:20:17

Thank you, Mister Chairman. I have a speaker at the d- I have a amendment at the desk.

2:20:18 – 2:20:19

The clerk will designate the amendment.

Clerk2:20:20 – 2:20:26

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute to HR nine four nine seven, offered by Mister Boss, number zero three five.

2:20:27 – 2:20:33

Without objection, the amendment will be considered as read. Mister Boss is recognized for five minutes to speak on his amendment.

2:20:33 – 2:22:56

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. First, I want to thank the ranking member, uh, Larson, and and the the Chairman's leadership in bipartisan Water Resource Development Act. I appreciate the tremendous amount of work that has gone into this legislation. I strongly support uh advancing the bill forward. Today, though, I am offering an amendment related to my bill, H. R. eighty twelve eighty-five, the Water Infrastructure, Subcontractor and Taxpayer Protection Act. I believe we have both the an opportunity and a responsibility to strengthen protections for taxpayers, subcontractors, and the federal government on all water infrastructure projects. As many of my colleagues know, payment and performance bonds have protected federal construction projects for nearly a century. They ensure taxpayers receive the projects they pa- they paid for, while also protecting the small businesses and subcontractors that perform the work for bearing uh and bearing the financial consequences if a prime contractor fails. While new and in innovative delivery methods have become more popular for protecting delivery, not all are required by law to have bonding protection, posing a significant threat to taxpayers, workers, and small businesses. It is critical that the long-standing protection offered by p- by payment and performance bonds are in place on all projects where taxpayer dollars are at stake regardless of the pr- pr- procurement vehicle selection. Selected. I'm recognized that this is an issue that deserves thoughtful consideration and continued discussion with the committee. I also recognize that this legislation has garnered significant bipartisan and bicameral support that warrants additional attention from this committee. Mister Chairman, I understand that you and the ranking member intend to continue the committee's work on additional water infrastructure protection later this year. and that there were will be other opportunities for the committee to consider measures that could be accommodated in today's mark-up. I appreciate your willingness to continue to work and to and today I would like to get a commitment from you and ranking member Larson in agreement to hold an additional mark-up this year on water infrastructure priorities to give H R twelve eighty-five the full consideration it deserves as part of the process.

2:22:57 – 2:22:58

We commit to working together.

2:22:58 – 2:23:09

With that understanding, and in in in interest of moving forward with the Werner bill uh today on a bipartisan basis, I wanna withdraw my amendment and I thank the chair and I yield back.

2:23:09 – 2:23:20

Without objection. For what purpose does Mister Vandrews seek recognition?

2:23:24 – 2:23:26

Mister Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.

2:23:26 – 2:23:27

Clerk will designate the amendment.

Clerk2:23:28 – 2:23:34

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute to H R nine four nine seven, offered by Mister Van Drew, number one two nine.

2:23:35 – 2:23:41

Without objection, the amendment will be considered as read. Mister Van Drew is recognized for five minutes to speak on his amendment.

2:23:41 – 2:26:34

Thank you, Mister Chairman. This amendment addresses the Hereford Inlet and Cape May Inlet coastal storm risk reduction project in Cape May County, New Jersey. I would like to ensure that the first phase of the project takes place entirely within the jurisdiction of North Wildwood, and that the sand used for the project comes from the Hereford Inlet, Hereford Inlet Beach, or other local sources. North Wildwood has experienced years of severe and problematic erosion. Every major coastal storm brings renewed concern for the residents, the businesses, and critical infrastructure that depends on a healthy protective beach th- mister chairman this is simply not about rebuilding a beach it is about protecting lives it's about protecting homes it's about protecting businesses it's about ensuring this community has the same level of protection that so many other coastal communities have already received this project is intended as a regional solution But that approach has faced significant implementation challenges. Meanwhile, North Wildwood continues to experience substantial severe shoreline loss, while the ongoing general re-evaluation program and report works towards a long-term solution for the entire project area. This amendment addresses immediate public safety and public safety concerns, while the Corps completes its broader planning efforts. I've had productive conversations with this committee, and I appreciate, sincerely appreciate their willingness to engage on this issue. I look forward to continuing to work with the committee, the core of engineers and all interested stakeholders, to pursue other avenues that can advance this project, whether through the ongoing general re-evaluation report, future word of legislation, administrative actions or any other appropriate mechanisms that are needed. We have to deal with this. Everyone involved in this project shares the same objective, to get meaningful coastal projection delivered to the people of North Wildwood as quickly as possible they deserve, no less. The people of North Wildwood have waited long enough, and I will continue to working until they receive the protection that they deserve like everyone else. With that understanding and the spirit of continuing to work collaboratively with the committee to find the best path forward, I ask the Chairman if the Chairman and staff and ranking member will work with me on this very important issue.

2:26:35 – 2:26:35

Yes, we will.

2:26:36 – 2:26:45

I thank the Chairman. I thank you, Mr. Chairman. And in that case, I will be withdrawing my amendment for future work. And I yield back, Mr. Chairman.

2:26:46 – 2:26:57

Without objection. For what purpose does Mr. Perry seek recognition?

2:26:58 – 2:27:00

Thanks, Mr. Chairman. I have an amendment to desk.

2:27:00 – 2:27:02

Clerk will designate the amendment.

Clerk2:27:03 – 2:27:08

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute to HR nine four nine seven, offered by Mr. Perry, number three two seven.

2:27:09 – 2:27:14

Without objection, the amendment will be considered as read. period recognized for five minutes to speak on his amendment.

2:27:15 – 2:28:18

Thank you, Mr. Chairman, this amendment would stop the U S Army Corps from promulgating or enforcing any firearm prohibitions at water resources development projects, so long as the person is not otherwise prohibited from owning a firearm and subject to state law. This would harmonize USACE's treatment of firearm possession with those of other federal land agencies such as the National Park Service and Bureau of Land Management. USACE's proposed rollback proposed rolling back its broad-based firearm possession prohib prohibition during the end of President Trump's first term but this action was never completed this language mirrors the provision included in the house version of the Energy and Water Appropriations Act every fiscal year since we reclaimed the majority, FY twenty-four, five, six and seven. This amendment simply restores the second amendment rights of Americans if they are on Army Corps property. The God-given rights of Americans shouldn't end just because they cross an arbitrary line into USACE's jurisdiction or property without urge adoption and yield the balance.

2:28:19 – 2:28:22

Gentlemen Yales, chair recognize Miss Davids, five minutes.

2:28:24 – 2:29:05

Thank you, Chairman. Uh, the ranking member opposes the amendment offered by Mister Perry. For decades, the Corps has allowed law enforcement and hunters to freely possess loaded firearms on Corps property, but has required others to obtain written permission to possess a firearm. This reasonable regulation recognizes two critical realities. One, that core park rangers do not have law enforcement authority, and two, there is a security risk in having unrestricted firearms close to critical national infrastructure, such as dams, navigation locks, and hydroelectric facilities. The ranking member opposes this amendment and encourages all members to do the same. Mister Chairman, I yield back.

2:29:08 – 2:29:16

Do any members wish to speak on this amen- be recognized on this amendment? Mister Hurd, you wanna be, you wanna speak on this?

2:29:16 – 2:31:14

Yes, sir. Uh, thank you, Mister Chairman. I do support this amendment, but I'd like to use my time to speak in support of the underlying bill. I'm proud to support this important legislation that provides critical support to America's water infrastructure and helps support the growing economy in Western and Southern Colorado. Uh, amid increasing partis- partisanship uh that we see in this body, the fact that Congress has been able to move WERDA every two years since twenty fourteen is a testament to the serious bipartisan nature of this legislation. This bill modernizes our nation's waterway infrastructure through a bottom-up approach, consulting our local US Army Corps districts and the project owners they work with on which projects are ready and in need of feasibility studies or construction authorization. This ensures that we craft a WERDA bill that fully supports our local needs, and relies on the feedback of people who are closest on the ground in dealing with these issues every single day. I'm particularly proud that this bill includes my request to include Colorado among states eligible for section five ninety-five environmental infrastructure authority which supports water infrastructure development in rural western states while authorizing up to a hundred and fifty million dollars in project authority for projects within the centennial state. While Colorado is the headwater state for many western states already included in the program, Colorado has not been eligible to access the same section five ninety-five core authorities as these other states have. The section five ninety-five program provides design and construction assistance for projects that deal with critical issues such as flood risk management, wastewater treatment, and drought resilience, which are all important for rural communities in my district in western and southern Colorado. I'm proud that this bill helps support these communities and ensures that they have access to these federal resources. I want to thank Chairman Graves, Ranking Member Larson, Water Resources and Environment Subcommittee Chairman Collins and Ranking Member Wilson, as well as the amazing TNI committee staff for putting this strong legislation together, and I look forward to advancing it. Thank you, Mister Chairman. With that, I yield back.

2:31:14 – 2:31:40

Gentlemen yield. Do any members want to be wished to be recognized on this amendment? Are there any further speakers on this amendment? Seeing none, are there Any amendments to the amendment? Seeing none, the question on the amendment is all in favor by signify by saying aye. All opposed say no.

2:31:40 – 2:31:40

Nay.

2:31:41 – 2:31:44

The nays have it and the amendment is not agreed to.

2:31:46 – 2:31:48

Mr. Chairman, I request a recorded vote.

2:31:49 – 2:32:06

Recorded vote is requested. The gentleman requests a recorded vote on the amendment as previously announced, pursuant to committee rule six F, further proceedings on the question are postponed. For what purpose does Mister Owens seek recognition?

2:32:06 – 2:32:18

Mr. Chairman, I'd br- uh, like to briefly flag an amendment, uh, that I will not be offering to the vote today. It would extend to the Army Corps' uh civil works, the same construction um construction

2:32:18 – 2:32:22

Clerk needs to designate. Oh, just a second. The clerk will designate the amendment.

Clerk2:32:23 – 2:32:29

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute to H R nine four nine seven offered by Mister Owens number zero five one.

2:32:30 – 2:32:35

Without objection, the amendment will be considered as read. Mister Owens is recognized for five minutes on his amendment.

2:32:35 – 2:33:00

Thank you, Mister Chairman. I'd like to briefly flag an amendment I won't be offering to to vote today. It would extend to the Army Corps' civil works, the same construction authority the Department of War already has, speeding up uh projects while keeping full completion and full bonding protections in place. At the end of the day, it's about speed. Accelerating delivery and much needed infrastructure for communities across the country. We work closely with stakeholders on both sides of the issue to get the language

2:33:25 – 2:33:39

Without objection, the amendments Thank you. withdrawn that the committee will work with you in going forward. The committee will now stand in recess.

Unknown3:26:50 – 3:26:52

for this passage you just say there

3:26:52 – 3:26:59

according to ok so we'll postpone to see proceedings the and then we'll do gsa and then we're done the board i mean he's the board because he's the board

3:26:59 – 3:27:01

i don't have to say that we've already said

3:27:01 – 3:27:41

and other other one we are Station infrastructure reconvene the previously recessed mark-up. For what purpose does Mister Mask seek recognition?

3:27:42 – 3:27:45

Thank you, Mister Chairman, I'd like to speak on uh an amendment I have for a moment.

3:27:46 – 3:27:46

Destinate.

Clerk3:27:48 – 3:27:54

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute to H R nine four nine seven, offered by Mister Mass, number one seven eight, revision one.

3:27:55 – 3:27:58

Without objection, the amendment will be considered as read. Mister Mass, you're recognized.

3:27:59 – 3:30:34

Thank you, Mister Chairman. In two thousand eighteen, members of this committee authorized what was known as the Everglades Agricultural Area Reservoir massive project seventeen thousand acre project stores seventy eight billion gallons of water to clean water and send that water south through Florida into the Florida Everglades and into the Florida Bay. Uh, and it had to be cleaned before it goes into the Everglades because that lake water that comes out of it's so dirty it was it was uh making the Everglades very dirty. So we voted to authorize it. We voted to fund it with every federal dollar that we've spent and had it matched by the state government as well. So great project. Uh, this has been a partnership for more than two decades, no matter who was in charge. Uh, everyone from the US Army Corps of Engineers, the state of Florida, Governor DeSantis, the South Florida Water Management District, who is the local sponsor, have all made it very clear in their own words what this project is and why it's being funded. Uh, and I would uh appreciate the opportunity for Congress to do the same. This puts in writing exactly what we authorized and exactly what we spent money on. It's not my words, it is the words of the Corps of Engineers, it is the words of the Florida Governor why this project exists, and it's a number of important reasons. Eliminate harmful transfers to the St. Lucie Estuary is one. Reducing harmful transfers of water to the Caloosahatchee River is one. Reducing harmful transfers to the Lake Worth Lagoon is one. Uh, and sending water south so that it doesn't cause any harm. Uh, that is a, you know, these are the project purposes, uh, you know, that water that comes out of Lake Okeechobee while also protecting and meeting water supply goals south of the lake consistent with congressionally authorized project purposes, which have been long-standing. This is what we voted for and that's what we spent billions billions of taxpayer dollars on. And years from now, we don't want anybody to rewrite that history. We spent nearly a decade and billions on this, on building this, and again, every federal construction contract has been now signed, including a two point eight billion dollar contract to build the embankment. Uh, this year we've delivered a record four hundred and sixty-one million in Everglades restoration funding, so again, great work. uh, by this committee, by the appropriations committee, uh, bipartisanly appreciate everybody's work. And, uh, I would just say it would be, uh, moronic for us to build this and not use it. And, uh, so glad to see that it's being built. This plan is in place. Uh, we will keep the pressure on until we're over the finish line. And again, I urge my colleagues to support, and I thank you for their support, and I yield back.

3:30:35 – 3:30:36

Mr. David.

3:30:37 – 3:31:22

Thank you, Chairman. One of the reasons the Corps' efforts to restore the Florida Everglades have been so successful is because of the tradition of elected leaders local stakeholders and the Corps working hand in hand to address the unique needs of the region in a nonpartisan manner. The ranking member is glad to hear that we have found a consensus approach to the amendment from Mister Mast and the ranking member would like to thank all members, for working together on this one. This amendment is a sense of Congress on the Everglades Agricultural Area Project, which we know many members on and off the committee strongly support. As such, the ranking member supports the revised amendment from Mister Mast. I yield back.

3:31:24 – 3:31:24

Mister Webster.

3:31:26 – 3:31:26

Thank you.

3:31:26 – 3:32:02

Thank you, Mister Chairman. Uh, this sense of Congress amendment uh reflects a high level of goals and no way is intended to change the the how federal authorized programs and projects relating to SERP and and to Lake Okeechobee um are managed by the Corps. It's uh I'd also like to say that uh we wanna make note that we worked with Representative Mass' office to uh uh for the report language amendment which was in the uh which was in the compromise bill and the manager's amendment so yield back.

3:32:05 – 3:32:35

Does anyone else wish to be heard on the amendment? I might say that I appreciate both sides um working together on this. Um, both sides came a long way and uh it is very much uh appreciated. Seeing no one else. Are there any amendments to the amendment? Seeing none, the question is on the amendment, all those in favor signify by saying aye.

Clerk3:32:35 – 3:32:35

Aye.

Unknown3:32:35 – 3:32:36

Aye.

3:32:36 – 3:33:05

All opposed signify by saying nay. The ayes have it, the amendment is agreed to. For purpose of Mr. Ronderer's rise. By the way, before you speak, Mr. Ronderer, we're getting ready to vote, so make sure everybody um staff, make sure your members back in uh the committee room, cuz we're going to uh uh vote on the postponed uh amendments here pretty quickly and bills. Mister Onder.

3:33:05 – 3:33:07

Uh thank you Mister Chairman, I have an amendment.

3:33:08 – 3:33:09

Doesn't it?

Clerk3:33:09 – 3:33:12

An amendment to the amendment in the nature of a substitute to

3:33:10 – 3:33:10

It is

Clerk3:33:12 – 3:33:16

H R nine four nine seven offered by Mister Onder number zero three one.

3:33:17 – 3:33:19

Without objection, the amendment would be considered as read, Mister Onder, you're recognized.

3:33:20 – 3:35:26

Thank you Mister Chairman. My amendment makes a straightforward clarification to the definition of a ma- of a major rehabilitation project. within the Inland Waterways system. It clarifies that Inland Waterways Trust Fund uh is used to rehabilitate navigation locks while dam features continue to be to be treated under long-standing federal policy. This is a technical clarification, but it has important implications for how rehabilitation costs are shared. The distinction matters because navigation users are currently the only beneficiaries of the inland waterways system who are required to help pay for rehabilitating these dams. Even though the dams provide benefits that extend far beyond navigation, they provide flood control, municipal, industrial and agricultural water supply, hydroelectric uh generation, recreation and fish and wildlife habitat, they are public benefits enjoyed by communities across uh the country. The federal dam safety projects have traditionally been funded through general revenues because a dam failure can have catastrophic consequences. Inland waterway dams perform these same critical public safety functions and should be treated consistently. Earlier this year, I joined at least twenty-nine members of Congress from both sides of the aisle, including members on and off this committee in requesting that this clarification be included in word at twenty twenty six. Although I'm disappointed that it wasn't included in the bill or the manager's amendment i appreciate the committee's willingness to continue discussing this issue at the end of the day this is an issue of fairness navigation users should not be expected to bear the cost of rehabilitating infrastructure that in serves the entire public uh not just navigation i look forward to continuing to work with the committee and my colleagues uh to find a solution And with that, I I move I move the adoption of the amendment.

3:35:27 – 3:35:28

Mr. Larson.

3:35:29 – 3:36:18

Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Uh, I oppose the amendment that Mr. Anders offered. This amendment amounts to a cost share shift for projects on the inland system, which this committee has already acted on in the last three word of bills. To continue shifting these costs onto the Corps' general fund would mean taking funds away from other critical projects for flood risk reduction or ecosystem restoration. It also means less funds for essentially any project that is not on the inland waterways system. Further, we have no firm estimate on the dollar amounts we would be shifting, so the range of impacts on core funds could be larger than anticipated. And for those reasons, um and I'll with all due respect to Mister Andra and the needs of the of the uh inland waterway system, uh I do oppose this amendment without a yield back.

3:36:20 – 3:36:33

Does anyone else wish to be heard? On the amendment? Seeing none, are there any amendments to the amendment? Seeing none, the question is on the amendment. All those in favor, signify by saying aye.

3:36:34 – 3:36:34

Aye.

3:36:34 – 3:37:02

All opposed, signify by saying nay. It appear the nays have it. The gentleman has requa requested a recorded vote. It's previously announced pursuant to committee rules. Six F. Further proceedings on the question will be postponed. Again, as noted, there are recorded votes to amendments requested. So, pursuant to committee rule six F further proceedings on the measure

3:37:02 – 3:37:05

We've four minutes, I think. One minute left.

3:37:05 – 3:37:05

Oh.

3:37:08 – 3:37:08

Got to postpone.

3:37:09 – 3:37:09

Are postponed.

3:37:11 – 3:37:11

Mm-hmm.

3:37:12 – 3:37:38

Are there any mem- let's see, where are we? All right. Right, the committee previously postponed proceedings on the GSA resolutions in block.

3:37:39 – 3:37:39

Yep.

3:37:40 – 3:38:00

The question is now on the GSA resolutions in block, which are agreed to by voice vote, is recorded vote still requested? The recorded vote is still requested. So, we're going to um we're gonna hold this vote open for a little while till we get um everybody in here will go ahead and open the board the channel will be voting aye.

3:38:01 – 3:38:02

Ranking to vote aye.

3:38:15 – 3:38:16

So I can go behind the picture.

3:38:16 – 3:38:17

This is the one.

Morning digest

Start every morning briefed on yesterday’s hearings

A free weekday email covering yesterday’s hearings and transcripts newly unlocked in the archive.

Free weekday email. Unsubscribe anytime.