Senate seal

Senate · Hearing transcript

FY 2027 Budget Hearing for FBI, DEA, U.S. Marshals Service, and ATF

Tuesday, May 12, 2026

Summary

  • Kash Patel (Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation) categorically denied reports of excessive drinking and unavailability as false under oath during heated budget hearing.

  • Terrance C. Cole (Administrator, Drug Enforcement Administration) called fentanyl a weapon of mass destruction and touted 600 arrests and major seizures.

  • Van Hollen pressed Patel on drinking allegations and polygraphs while Patel accused Van Hollen of false attacks during heated exchange over fitness for duty.

  • Sen. Coons (D-DE) questioned FBI election actions and Iran firings while Sen. Collins (R-ME) sought more help against Chinese marijuana operations.

  • Chairman Moran said senators may submit follow-up questions within 30 days as subcommittee writes FY27 funding bills for FBI, DEA, Marshals Service and ATF priorities.

Morning digest

Get hearings like this in your inbox

Free weekday email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Hearing Details

Witnesses

Members Who Spoke

Free. We email you a one-time download link.

View on Congress.gov

Transcript

15:07 – 18:03

This hearing will consider the President's FY twenty twenty-seven budget request for the Department of Justice's law enforcement components, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Drug Enforcement Administration of the United States, Marshal Service, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and Explosives. First, this hearing takes place during National Police Week, and this is a time for our country to recognize the men and women in law enforcement. who work every day to keep our communities and country safe. Director Patel, Saralta, Sa- uh, Sa- I know you well, sir. Uh, and Administrator Cole, please express my gratitude to the agents and deputies, duty officers, professional staff, and families who, uh, support your agencies. I appreciate their service in Kansas. Kansans appreciate their service at home and in our country. and our country is safer because of what they do. Traditionally, this subcommittee has only received a budget defense from the Attorney General on behalf of the entire Department of Justice and the Director of the FBI. As the Chairman of this subcommittee, I've had the opportunity to meet with many dedicated professional law enforcement officers and staff at ATF the DEA, FBI, and United States Marshal Service. I've long believed that these agencies, they also deserve, in addition to the in addition to the Department of Justice, the opportunity to explain to this committee the resources they need to execute their missions. Each of you, all these agencies are important, and I want this subcommittee to be able to hear from you and to ask you questions uh regarding your budget requests. Our witnesses will discuss their budget requests in greater detail today, so I'll only note that each component has requested an increase above the FY twenty twenty-six enacted levels. We've had several years of relatively flat budgets, and in the case of ATF, significant reductions. These agencies need additional resources to carry out their responsibilities effectively. I've seen firsthand the important work these agencies are doing at in my home state, whether it's ATF expanding crime gun intelligence through its partnership at Wichita State University DEA's effort to combat fentanyl trafficking and support law enforcement in rural communities across Kansas, the FBI's coordination with state and local partners as Kansas City prepares to host soccer matches during the FY uh the during the uh FIFA twenty twenty-six World Cup or the Marshals working alongside local law enforcement through fugitive task forces across the District of Kansas. Today's hearing is an opportunity for this committee to better understand the challenges facing each of your agencies, the resources you believe are necessary to ca- carry out your missions and how Congress can best support the men and women serving in the federal law enforcement. I appreciate each of you being here today and I look forward to your testimony. Senator Van Hollen, uh you're recognized.

18:04 – 22:57

Uh thank you, Mister Chairman, I look forward to working with you again to write a bill that provides the resources the FBI, DEA, ATF and the US Marshal Service need to protect their core missions, ensuring the safety, security and rights of the American people. I also look forward to continuing to work with you to ensure oversight and accountability regarding the new FBI headquarters and making sure that it meets the mission and security requirements of the FBI. And I welcome all the witnesses today as we recognize key members of our American law enforcement family during National Police Week. I look forward to hearing about the various budget requests, but we should acknowledge that we are not gathered here at this hearing at a normal time because what we are learning about what's happening at the FBI is anything but normal. Director Patel, as you ask for more taxpayer resources, we cannot look away from the credible, extremely troubling reports about your misconduct at the FBI. All four of you hold positions of great public trust. The American people trust that each of you will responsibly exercise your powers to protect them. You're expected to be on call night and day. able to make quick decisions to guard our nation's security. You must always be prepared to answer that call, whether it comes at three p m or three a m. That is your duty. Director Patel, I don't care one bit about your private life, and I don't give a damn about what you do on your own time and your own dime unless and until it interferes with your public responsibilities. Being the director of the FBI is an awesome responsibility. And when your private actions make it impossible for you to perform your public duties, we have a big problem. You cannot perform those public duties if you're incapacitated. And Director Patel, these reports about your conduct, including reports of your being so drunk and hung over that your staff had to force entry into your home, are extremely alarming. If true, they demonstrate a gross dereliction of your duty and a betrayal a public trust. I cannot imagine ever having to worry about former FBI Directors Ray or Mueller spending multiple weekends drinking heavily at the Poodle Room in Las Vegas. Now, I understand that you've denied these reports and you will have a chance today here to challenge them. But the problem with your leadership is does not end there. We're also witnessing a litany of other abuses, political firings of trusted career agents only fault was following the facts and the law. That includes the firing of agents and staff from a special counterintelligence unit that monitored threats from Iran. Weaponizing the FBI to seek political revenge on former FBI Director James Comey and others. Using FBI investigative resources to go after journalists who write stories that you don't like. And just this morning, we learned more details about your firing of Brian Driscoll, a decorated FBI special agent with too late nearly two decades of experience. He claims in an interview that you made clear that his failure at the FBI was tied to pol- that his future at the FBI was tied to his political allegiance to Donald Trump. So you're asking for more resources at a time that you're misspending valuable resources on political revenge instead of focusing on defending our national security. I'm pleased as the chairman said that all of your agencies noticed our bipartisan opposition to the deep cuts from last year and have provi- presented more robust plans this year. There are still major gaps to be addressed. One notable example among the DOJ programs is the elimination of the organized crime drug enforcement task forces. As I understand it, DEA was oddly sidelined in this process. I'm also concerned about diverting resources away from core missions of each of your agencies to fuel President Trump's mass deportation agenda. Trump told us he was going after the quote "worst of the worst" who posed a danger to our communities. That would be fine. But if you look at the Department of Homeland Security's own data, overwhelmingly the people being targeted and locked up pose no risk to public safety. So when you divert resources away from fighting serious violent crime to locking people up who mostly don't pose a risk to public safety, you're making us less, not more safe. Let me close by thanking the thousands of law enforcement personnel, both local, state, and federal, who work tirelessly each day to keep us all safe. And I look forward to the hearing and discussion today. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

22:57 – 22:58

You're welcome.

22:58 – 23:13

You're welcome, ranking member. Uh, I look forward to working with you as we work our way through these, uh, budget requests and our appropriations process. Uh, I now, uh, recognize our witnesses for their testimony and I recognize the director of the FBI Uh, Kash Patel.

23:14 – 23:28

Good afternoon, Chairman Moran, Ranking Member Van Hollen, and members of the subcommittee. Thank you for inviting me to represent the FBI's fiscal year, twenty twenty seven. It's an honor to represent the thirty six thousand men and women of the of the FBI that serve around the country and around the world, especially during Police Week.

23:28 – 23:30

Director, would you pull the mike closer, please?

23:30 – 23:30

Of course.

23:30 – 23:30

Thank you.

23:31 – 25:58

Um, this week, especially for Police Week, we pause to commemorate the incredible dedication and bravery of our law enforcement communities across the country, who stand on the front lines and shield our citizens from dangers and threaten. our everyday way of life. Every day the FBI safeguards our nation's safety and security with our law enforcement partners. To achieve our no-fail mission, we fully support the President's budget proposal for the FBI of p- twelve point five three billion, um to um to get us right sides. Before getting into specifics, I'd like to highlight that the importance of the FBI mission is never more important than at this critical time, especially during the recent violent attacks during the White House Correspondents' dinner which all too many of us were there. I was proud that the FBI within moments immediately jumped into action, launched a bi-coastal investigation, launched fixed wing and rotary assets in men and women, in evidence response teams, bond technicians and interviews. And within twenty-four hours we had that evidence from California to Boston, back in Washington DC, and the individual was charged. That is truly exemplary work by the inter-agency and our state and local partners and the men and women of the FBI. Thanks to the brilliant personnel at the FBI, this year has been truly historic in the reduction of crime. It has been a record-breaking year. We have seen in twenty twenty five alone a historic twenty point decline in the nation's murder rate. We also saw forty four thousand violent offenders arrested by this FBI last year alone. To put that in perspective, that's twice as many violent offenders offenders arrested in all of twenty twenty four. The FBI seized more than twenty two hundred kilograms of fentanyl uh last year. That's a thirty one percent increase from twenty twenty four. That's enough to kill a hundred and eighty million Americans across this country. The FBI arrested eight of our top ten most wanted fugitives, um, in just fourteen months. To put that in perspective, that's double the mu- number of the entirety of the prior administration. We've made over three thousand arrests and seized over a thousand firearms at the border including ninety high value targets from Mexico brought here for prosecution and through our leadership in the Homeland Security Task Force and the inter-agency a six week effort led by the um HST S contributed to four hundred operations uh thirty-two federal agents working it and ninety-one metric. tons of drugs were seized. We've also seen unprecedented progress in protecting our most vulnerable our children. In twenty twenty five we located more than sixty three hundred missing uh kids. That's a thirty percent increase from twenty twenty four. And we arrested more than two thousand child predators and human traffickers in twenty twenty five. That's a seventeen percent increase from twenty twenty four.

25:59 – 25:59

Sure.

25:59 – 26:03

We also wiped out four million pedophile accounts off the dark web entirely.

26:04 – 26:04

Well.

26:04 – 29:30

And we also focused in on the seven six four network, those who especially target our youth and are vulnerable online. And we saw a five hundred percent increase in the arrests of the NVE community. Um, and s- in terms of national uh security, we've been equally aggressive on that front as well, on the counterterrorism side, on the domestic, and homegrown violent extremist side. And there's no overstating that our work, the men and women at the FBI, proudly stopped four terrorist attacks in the month of December last year alone, in California, Pennsylvania, Texas and New York. We also stood up the NSPM joint s- mission center, integrating intelligence and operational expertise across our agencies to disrupt political violence and domestic terrorism. We finally empowered our capabilities at the FBI with an AI advancement um that the FBI workforce has not seen. This FBI is up using AI two hundred and thirty percent across our enterprise. Uh the bureau is fully engaged in defending against cyber attacks from nation-state adversaries criminals and everything in between. Last year, our Internet Crime Complaint Center fielded more than one million complaints. That near totaled nearly twenty-one billion dollars in losses based on cyber theft. Uh, we've also seen an increase in complex financial crime arrest, included four hundred indictments, and seized over one point six billion dollars in funds related to those crimes, a sixty-five percent increase. Maybe most impactful in terms of scams, the FBI has led the overseas operations in Cambodia, Thailand and Burma, crippling the scam center compound stood up by the CCP. um including the arrest of an individual uh responsible fourteen billion dollars in scams alone and we're scuttling these compounds one by one just last week in Dubai thanks to the cooperation of the FBI and the Dubai National Police and MPS we arrested three hundred individuals freed two thousand people who were forced into traffic labor and shut down a four billion dollar scam center that was operating to fleece Americans and seniors of their hard-earned dollars. The FBI's unique authorities on these front lines show that we're defending the homeland Just last month we extradited Gigi Wei, one of the top two cyber hackers from Italy. They say we couldn't get him. They thought the CCP was gonna get him, but now he's here in prison. Our work collectively on the counter-intelligence mission speaks for itself. Forty-three percent more counter-intelligence arrest in twenty twenty-five than all of twenty twenty-four from China, DPRK, Russia, and um elsewhere. And as you know, to Mister Chairman, we are busy getting ready for protecting Americans from every event, the Olympics, the World Cup, the F one, the Super Bowl. Um, as we drive into twenty twenty eight, but this summer all eyes are focused on the World Cup and the FEI and DHS stand ready, uh, learning from our valuable experiences and focusing on a fourteen month lift to ensure everybody is taken care of um when they visit our country for this, World Cup event. Uh lastly, we have secured record breaking achievements to um include task force officers from around the country, including deputizing our own officers, reducing the task force officer pipeline from fourteen months to sixty days, allowing men and women in law enforcement to work together at speeds that have never been delivered before. With your continued support, this FBI stands ready to continue this great work, and I stand ready to answer any and all questions from you. And categorically, Mister Vice Chairman, when you say there's credible reporting, just because you say it's credible doesn't make it so. This FBI is doing a historic level of crime reduction across the country. I'm proud to lead it. And if you wanna cite media reporting to discredit the men and women of the FBI go right ahead. The target's right here. the mission has never been more successful.

29:32 – 29:35

Administrator uh Terence Cole, Drug Enforcement Agency.

29:36 – 35:27

Chairman Moran, Ranking Member Van Hollen and members of the subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today. It's an honor to be here during National Police Week when we recognize the men and women of law enforcement who have given their lives in a line of duty. I appreciate your continued support of the Drug Enforcement Administration and nearly nine thousand professionals who carry out the mission across the United States and around the world. As a law enforcement veteran of more than thirty years, I come before you with a straightforward message. The threat we face today is unlike anything we've seen before. The DEA's mission has never been more urgent. Fentanyl continues to kill Americans at alarming rates. It's not just another drug threat, it's a weapon of mass destruction. Measured in American lives, lost every day. It's produced and distributed by transnational criminal organizations that have industrialized death for profit. The Sinaloa and Jalisco new generation cartels, now designated foreign terrorist organizations, are driving this crisis. They operate as a global enterprise. They use sophisticated supply chains, financial networks, and technology to move poison into our communities. They are well-funded, highly adapted, and relentless. We have to be just as relentless in our response. And DEA is leading the fight. We're taking the fight directly to these organizations with aggressive intelligence-driven enforcement. Our focus is clear. Target leadership. Break their command and control. Disrupt supply chains. Hold accountable those who profit from the addiction and death, including the global networks that supply precursor chemicals to make fentanyl production possible, and we are delivering results. In one recent coordinated search, DEA and our partners made more than six hundred arrests. We seized hundreds of kilograms of fentanyl, multi-ton quantities of cocaine and meth, hundreds of firearms, and more than eleven million dollars in U. S. currency. Across our fentanyl operations, we've made thousands of arrests, tied to trafficking networks, seized millions, of fentanyl pills, removed hundreds of kilograms of fentanyl powder from circulation. Those numbers translate directly into lives saved. We're also seeing an impact at our community level. In one city alone, targeted operations with our partners led to the reduction in violent crime of more than one third, and a significant amount of drugs and firearms taken off the streets. Drug trafficking drives violence. When we dismantle these networks, we're not just removing drugs, We're making communities safer. We're also focused on the financial side of this fight. We're going after the money, including the use of cryptocurrency and other tools that these organizations rely on to move and hide profits. Our reach is both global and local. DEA operates in eighty-two offices across sixty-two countries and maintains a presence of twenty-six field divisions with more than two hundred offices here at home. This allows us to attack the problem from source to the street. We do this work with discipline and accountability. DEA's workforce is a driven agency. We have nearly nine thousand employees on board against an authorized level of nearly ninety-seven hundred employees. That includes just over four thousand special agents on board, compared to nearly forty-eight hundred authorized. We prioritize putting people where they have the greatest impact on the front lines. We're also careful stewards of the taxpayers' resources. More than eighty percent of our budget supports mandatory costs like salaries. Only a small portion is available for operational work. That means every operational dollar has to count. And it does. We prioritize keeping agents in the field, focus our resources on action that dismantles organizations, and removes drugs from our community. We measure success by impact, networks disrupted, communities protected, lives saved. The president's budget reflects confidence in that approach. It supports DEA's mission, our results, and our stewardship of resources entrusted to us. At the same time, the threat continues to evolve. These organizations move fast. They exploit global supply chains, digital platforms, and financial systems to keep the pace DEA has to strengthen its capacity in intelligence, data, and technology. This means giving our agents and analysts the tools to connect information, identify networks, and act quickly. It means improving how we share intelligence with federal, state, local, tribal, and international partners. And it means making sure our workforce has what it needs to do the job. This is about enabling investigators to get out from behind the desk and onto the streets, where they have the greatest impact. Our mission is simple, protect Americans and save American lives. We do this by enforcing the law, dismantling organizations driving this crisis, and working with our partners across the country and around the world. The men and women of DEA understand what is at stake. They see it every day. They carry out this mission with professionalism and purpose. With your continued support, we will stay on the offensive. We will keep pressure on the cartels. We will continue to disrupt networks driving the fentanyl crisis. And we will continue to protect Americans with the resources you entrust to us. Thank you, and I look forward to your questions.

35:29 – 35:34

Uh, thank you, Administrator. Uh, now, Director Seralta of the United States Marshal Service. Director?

35:35 – 40:59

Thank you, Mr. Chairman, South Committee members. Good afternoon and thank you for the opportunity to testify on behalf of the United States Marshal Service fiscal year twenty twenty seven, President's budget request. The United States Marshal Service occupies a uniquely central position in the federal justice system. While perf- protecting the judiciary, we're also the enforcement arm of the federal courts, involved in virtually every federal law enforcement initiative. Further, we are the federal government's primary agency for fugitive ap- investigations and have the broadest arrest authority among federal law enforcement agencies. The US Marshal Service has been at the apex of federal judicial protection, investigation and enforcement with vast mission responsibilities such as witness protection and prisoner management as well. The United States Marshal Service is unique from all other agencies and has no control over the workload for our primary mission, protecting, defending and enforcing the American justice system. For example, we cannot control the number of threats to our protectees and the subsequent required protection details. Prisoners that enter our custody cannot be controlled. How many federal witnesses we protect. or how many judicial proceedings are held each year. We're excited to work with you in advancing the United States Marshal Service forward in fiscal year twenty twenty seven. This will require increases in personal equipment and equipment for critical safety needs. Our total budget request for nearly five point two billion includes, God bless you, two point two billion for salaries and expenses, fifteen million for construction, and three billion for federal prisoner detention. Our workforce is one of the smallest in the federal law enforcement, at about thirty eight hundred deputy US Marshals. However, in fiscal year twenty twenty five, we arrested over seventy three thousand fugitives, conducted over three hundred and eight thousand prisoner movements, housed over fifty-five thousand prisoners, managed thirty-seven thousand assets worth ten point four billion dollars, provided security details for eighteen protectees, in addition to securing the residences of the US Supreme Court justices. Our continued success depends on our ability to provide the appropriate funding and personnel to support our missions. The fiscal year twenty twenty-seven President's budget request maintains and advances funding for core activities. The US Marshal Service requests program increases of four hundred and seventy-eight million for salaries and expenses appropriation to to support the addition of nine hundred and eighteen positions of which six hundred and forty-five positions are for much needed Deputy United States Marshals. The budget request increases funding for judicial security and protective operations, establishes a protective equipment program, provides permanent resources for safe task forces, expands immigration enforcement, right-sizes fugitive task forces, and institutes a cyclical replacement of vehicles. One highlight of the US Marshal Service budget request is one that is always at the forefront of my heart, and this committee's concern, and that's the safety and security of our law enforcement officers. This morning at the Marshal Service Headquarters, we honored our fallen as part of our National Police Week ceremonies, recognizing officers who have lost their lives in the line of duty. We read the names of more than three hundred of them. It is imperative that we provide the best equipment and training to aid in protecting our deputies while accomplishing our operational missions safely and successfully. I would like to discuss a matter of utmost importance, courthouse security and our construction appropriation. Unfortunately, the backlog of renovation projects to fix critical facility and security deficiency currently exceeds four hundred and eighty-four million. Additional funding is necessary to maintain the infrastructure for the safety of the judicial officials. courtroom participants, the public, and our personnel. Lastly, the Marshal's service is required to house all detainees remanded to the custody of the Attorney General, and must ensure sufficient resources are available for their housing and care. We have had some funding challenges in the last few years and appreciate the President's budget request of three billion dollars. In closing, our continued success depends on our ability to provide the appropriate funding, and personnel to support these vital functions. And so on behalf of the brave m- w- men and women of the United States Marshal Service, I thank you.

41:01 – 41:10

Thank you. And now, Robert Sacata, the uh Director of the Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms and for and I appreciate your attendance. Thank you.

41:12 – 45:28

Good afternoon, sir. Good afternoon, Chairman Moran, Ranking Member Van Hollen, and members of the subcommittee. Thank you for the opportunity to discuss the President's fiscal year twenty twenty-seven budget request for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. I am truly honored to be here. ATF is the only federal law enforcement agency whose primary mission is combating violent crime. We arrest violent criminals, disrupt firearms trafficking networks that arm gangs and cartels, investigate bombings and arsons, and deliver world-class forensic and intelligence services to state and local partners. all while protecting the second amendment rights of law abiding Americans. We are a small federal agency with roughly forty six hundred employees, but we are mighty. Our actions speak for themselves, since January twenty of twenty twenty five, ATF has arrested over eight thousand seven hundred criminals and seized nearly forty four thousand firearms. Approximately fifty one hundred were interdicted before they were trafficked into Mexico. Just over two point seven million rounds of ammunition and more than twenty thousand three hundred illegal explosives were also interdicted and seized as evidence. ATF also investigated more than three thousand five hundred arsenic explosives incidents and deployed the national response team to twenty-two callouts, including the Palisades wildfire in California. We completed more than eleven thousand FFL inspections and processed nearly eight hundred fifty-six thousand firearm trace requests for our state and local partners. We've also been very busy making operational improvements to our E form's processing times. Between January one, twenty twenty six and April fourteenth, twenty twenty six, ATF received more than one million eform applications and finalized nearly nine hundred and twenty four thousand of those applications. Today we are on track to hit a new record. By the end of May, we will have processed as many eform one and four applications in twenty twenty six as we did in the entirety of twenty twenty three. We have done all of this while cutting forms one processing times from forty-two to forty-seven days to forty-two days, and cutting E form four processing times from two hundred and thirty days in twenty twenty-three to just twelve days today. The funds Congress has appropriated to date have allowed ATF to make a tangible difference in communities throughout the country every single day. ATF provides critical services to state and local law enforcement at no cost, including firearms tracing, ballistic intelligence and forensic laboratory examinations, involving firearms, arson, and explosives. These capabilities are central to identifying shooters, disrupting trafficking networks, and solving violent crime. ATF is grateful for this funding and has achieved a tremendous result, but without adequate investments by Congress, these results are not further sustainable. That is what makes the President's FI twenty-seven budget request for ATF so important. It totals one point six five two billion for salaries and expenses, with four thousand seven hundred forty-nine full-time equivalents. It is what ATF requires to sustain our mission. Notably, the administration's budget includes two program enhancements, seven point eight million for NIBIN and twenty-five point eight million for combat and gun violence. The NIBIN enhancement will enable ATF to replace aging ballistics imaging equipment and expand correlation services to additional sites. This would ensure timely investigative lead generation, allowing law enforcement to identify and apprehend violent offenders more effectively. The combating gun violence enhancement will enable ATF to add eighty-six positions, including sixty special agents, to support the expansion of firearms trafficking task forces along the southwest border and increase ATF's ability to identify, disrupt, and dismantle cross-border smuggling operations. If enacted, the administration's budget will enable ATF to sustain core capabilities, modernize critical infrastructure, and continue providing and expanding access to services for law enforcement partners allowing us to continue focusing on our unique mission of combating violent crime. The Senate has been a strong supporter of ATF's mission. I'm deeply grateful for that. I look forward to continuing to work together. I thank you all again. I look forward to your questions.

45:29 – 46:15

Director Sakata, thank you very much. Uh, let me, we'll now begin with a round of questions, uh, and I'll begin, uh, with you, Administrator Cole. I just, I just returned from a visit to China, where in conversations with Chinese leaders we again pushed the issue of, uh, precursor chemicals and their import to Mexico, and ultimately the drugs to the United States. Uh, I've also been to Mexico and met with a leadership there to encourage them to discourage China from continuing to import those precursors. What uh what's the DEA, what what's you uh what are you doing as the administrator to engage those foreign partners in China as well as other places India for example to break down this supply chain?

46:18 – 47:24

Senator, thank you, and DEA is laser focused on targeting and disrupting uh the supply chain out of China as well as in India. We've held uh two bilaterals this year uh with Chinese officials, one at DEA headquarters and the other one at our Rocky Mountain field division. Uh we continue to work on the ground in Beijing, China with NCB, the National Control Board in China, as well as MPS, the Ministry of Public Safety. We continue to stay engaged. We continue to target uh the Chinese organizations that are sending this precursor chemicals into Mexico for the manufacturing of fentanyl to come across our border. We will continue to stay on our front foot. We'll continue to target. We'll continue to work with US Ambassador David Perdue on the ground in China, who's been a tremendous advocate on the ground, not only for all federal law enforcement, but for protecting American citizens in our country from this danger of the precursor chemicals that continue to flow into Mexico and into Columbia.

47:25 – 47:36

Trader, how do you evaluate the interest, the willingness of the Chinese officials and other other foreign countries, their leadership in actually assisting in keeping the precursors out?

47:37 – 48:21

And at the ground level, we're working extremely well. I think there are still barriers that are in place. I hope that I know the president's visit this week will be fruitful as we continue to stay on the offense when it comes to protecting Americans. uh to this precursor chemicals that continue to flow into Mexico and and China. The Mexican authorities have stepped up their game um with bilateral cooperation. I think everybody at this table has seen an increase in the cooperation with Mexico, uh but we need more. Uh we can only determine the effect when we start to see the decrease in Americans that are dying at the hands of this poison that is coming out of Mexico, but is being fueled by China and India.

48:22 – 49:54

Uh, thank you for your efforts, uh, and I look forward to results. Um, Director Seralta, uh, you are the second US Marshal I ever met, uh, in a visit to Florida when you were the in the District of Florida. And I appreciate the hospitality you extended to me, I don't know, three years ago or so, uh, as I tried to learn about the Marshal's service in this capacity I hold on this committee. Um, You mentioned infrastructure at courthouses. Uh, I've taken an interest uh over the years in in the Commerce Justice Science subcommittee working to provide additional resources for judiciary security. Uh, and that has included uh security operations, courthouse security, protective details, uh, and threat response uh capabilities. We've also worked to provide legislation so that information can be removed from web sites uh regarding uh members of the judiciary and their families. You mentioned another aspect of this in your testimony, and that's about infrastructure. I leaned back to my staff to ask if this subcommittee has jurisdiction over infrastructure at courthouses, which I didn't necessarily think we did, but we do because it comes out of your budget. So I wanted to give you the chance to to highlight, for me at least, what's the current circumstances that our judges and court officials face in regard to threats And uh if it if you wanna re-highlight for us the things that we might do to be helpful, to make their uh persons more secure.

49:58 – 50:04

Thank you, Senator Moran. Uh it was a pleasure to have you in Florida. Hope to do that again sometime.

50:04 – 50:07

You did that never knowing that you were going to be the Director of the US Marketing Service,

50:06 – 50:07

I did not know that.

50:07 – 50:08

I assume.

50:08 – 50:31

Correct. Um so so our judicial security p- uh protective operations is is due to to with the President's budget to have an increase of thirty f- thirty four point six million dollars and that's gonna strengthen and expand the protective operations mission by adding more dedicated teams and allow the USMS to surge resources when

50:27 – 50:28

Mm-hmm.

50:31 – 51:27

threats necessitate enhanced judicial security but you bring about the question about uh uh the the construction backlog which I mentioned in my opening Um the construction backlog is four hundred and eighty four million dollars. And that uh includes thirty million of it for uh prisoner elevators. So any time we have to take a prisoner through a different elevator up the steps, uh we risk the the prisoner injuring himself or someone uh uh being injured uh by having the prisoner walking in in unsecured locations. So it it is a serious concern. It is something that I believe goes to the judicial security as a whole. Um the Marshal Service mitigates uh and and we triage what areas we work on, uh work with first uh with the input of the judiciary.

51:27 – 51:28

What do you think?

51:28 – 51:41

It would take just one more minute before I turn to to Senator Van Hollen. What threats, how what's the significance of the threats, members of the judiciary and their their uh court officers face today. Is it is it changing?

51:42 – 52:18

So so for the last for the last several years uh there's been an increase in threats um any threat that is a viable threat to a judge to us is serious business, it's something that we will uh uh investigate uh and arrest individuals and seek prosecution on. So uh there has been an increase in in threats it's it's been over the past several years. Um, and it's fueled uh uh primarily by social media, uh where folks can be uh uh brave on the internet, uh yet uh when we go meet up with them they're not so brave.

52:19 – 52:20

Thank you. Senator Van Hollen.

52:21 – 52:35

Uh thank you. Uh Director Sacata, you hold a position of public trust. You agree that you should lead by example and be held to at least the same standard of conduct as you expect of ATF agents.

52:37 – 52:37

Yes, sir.

52:38 – 52:49

And would you agree that if one of your agents was unable to perform his or her duties because of excessive drinking you would need to take corrective action or disciplinary measures?

52:49 – 52:50

Yes, sir.

52:51 – 53:00

Director Siralta, same question for you with respect to the US Marshal service. Do you agree with the responses from Director Sakata?

53:01 – 53:08

Reckon member Van Hollen, that would be uh correct. I would do that after a thorough investigation uh by our internal affairs.

53:09 – 53:13

Administrator Cole, I would Same question to you with respect to the DEA.

53:16 – 53:24

Yes, sir, I would echo what uh Rob and Gaddy have said after a thorough review by our OPR officer professional responsibility. Yes, sir.

53:25 – 53:29

Director Patel, do you agree with these three gentlemen as they're the FBI?

53:28 – 53:28

Yes, sir.

53:30 – 53:41

So you agree, Director Patel, that if one of your agents was unable to perform his or her duties because of excessive drinking you would need to take corrective or disciplinary action. You agree with that statement?

53:41 – 53:47

We would implement the inspection review process, just like these other agencies have their own internal investigations and complete that review.

53:48 – 54:27

As I said in my opening remarks, I I really don't care about your personal life so long as you are able to perform your public and official responsibilities, which are awesome responsibilities. Multiple reports, including reporting by the Atlantic, have alleged episodes of excessive drinking, unexplained absences, and behavior that concern current and former FBI and DOJ officials. You have publicly denied those allegations and filed a defamation lawsuit. So today as you testify before Congress, is it your testimony that those allegations are categorically false?

54:27 – 54:29

Unequivocally categorically false.

54:29 – 54:34

So there have been no occasions during your tenure when FBI personnel were unable to promptly reach you?

54:35 – 54:45

Absolutely not. You can ask my entire workforce. They hear from me at every single hour of the day, as do these great gentlemen here, as do the men and women of the inter-agencies state and local law enforcement and the White House.

54:45 – 54:50

And so there have been no occasions when your security detail had difficulty waking or locating you. Is that right?

54:51 – 54:55

Nope, it's a total force. I don't even know where you get this stuff, but it doesn't make it credible because you say so.

54:56 – 55:01

I'm not saying it uh Director Patel I I it's been written and documented I think.

55:00 – 55:01

You are literally saying it.

55:01 – 55:06

No I'm saying that these are reports uh Director Patel and I will say

55:01 – 55:02

No.

55:04 – 55:08

No unlike unlike your baseless reports the only person that was slinging

55:07 – 55:08

Director Patel

55:08 – 55:17

margaritas in El Salvador on the taxpayer dollar with a convicted gang-banging rapist was you the only person that ran up a seven thousand dollar bar tab in

55:13 – 55:16

You know the fact Director Patel

55:17 – 55:22

Washington DC at the lobby door was you so the only individual in this room

55:18 – 55:34

This suggests to me this suggests to me that the allegations are true. Are you polygraphing, Dir- Director Patel, come on. These are serious allegations that were made against you. They're in a lawsuit that you filed.

55:32 – 55:36

The allegations are false. You drinking margaritas with a gang guy,

55:35 – 55:36

Uh, you're actually,

55:36 – 55:37

you're true and on video.

55:36 – 55:39

it just goes to show you don't This goes

55:37 – 55:42

You running a seven thousand dollar bar tab at the lobby bar has been filed by your own office

55:40 – 55:44

Director Patel, this goes to show

55:43 – 55:45

to drink during the day. That's you.

55:45 – 55:46

Chair- Mister Chairman,

55:46 – 55:48

This is the ultimate example of hypocrisy.

55:47 – 55:48

Mister Chairman

55:48 – 55:53

I will not be tarnished by baseless allegations from fraudulent statements from the media.

55:51 – 55:59

Uh, let me ask the questions. The fact that you mention that indicates you don't know what you are talking about.

55:54 – 55:55

Absolutely.

55:59 – 56:00

Now here, director, no,

55:59 – 56:02

The only thing I know is you're the one drinking margaritas with Felicia.

56:01 – 56:07

you're Actually, that's a false statement, and I'm asking you about your statements,

56:07 – 56:07

I've answered that.

56:07 – 56:15

and I'm asking you about a particular report. And it, your testimonial is, so let me ask you this.

56:12 – 56:13

It's not a report.

56:15 – 56:29

Um Are you willing to take the the the test, the It's it's called the audit test that members of our activity military and others take to determine whether they have a drinking problem.

56:30 – 56:31

I'll take any test you're willing to take.

56:31 – 56:35

I will take it, Doc- Director Pitelli. I'll take it. You ready to take it?

56:35 – 56:35

Let's go.

56:35 – 56:36

Yes or no?

56:36 – 56:38

Let's go. Side by side.

56:37 – 56:50

I'll take it. I'll take it. All right. I think that, uh, the fact that you're so d- Have you have you ordered, uh, polygraph tests of members of your team to determine how that story came about?

56:51 – 56:53

The FBI conducts polygraph tests all the time.

56:53 – 57:03

No, have you have you ordered polygraph tests for members of your team to determine who was the source of the stories that I'm asking you about?

57:03 – 57:15

I don't order any polygraph tests. There's an internal inspection review process for any and all leaks, especially of baseless information at the FBI that's been in place for the last thirty years. Those processes are followed by career intelligence and agents on the ground.

57:16 – 57:31

So I'll I'll take that as a a yes, since you said that these were these were unauthorized disclosures. Uh, I have another round of questioning regarding your firing people who were important to in t- gathering intelligence with respect to Iran, but I'll wait for my second round.

57:32 – 57:32

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Sure thing.

57:34 – 57:38

Senator Collins, uh, we're pleased to have the ch- the chairwoman of the full committee with us.

57:39 – 58:22

Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. Director Patel, the proliferation of illegal marijuana grow houses connected to transnational criminal organizations originating in China, is an ongoing problem in the state of Maine. A DHS memo in twenty twenty three estimated that Maine had as many as two hundred seventy Chinese-backed illegal marijuana operations producing up to an estimated four point three billion dollars in illicit revenues.

58:21 – 58:21

Mm-hmm.

58:23 – 1:00:15

Since then, thousands of pounds of illegal marijuana have been seized, primarily because of the tireless work of our main sheriffs and local law enforcement in Maine. One other side effect of these illegal grow operations is they usually destroy the houses in which they're located. which exacerbates the housing shortage in my state. Last year you testified that the FBI would be sending more resources to the field, specifically to Maine, to combat these dangerous operations. I speak with Maine sheriffs frequently about this problem, and they have reported some improvement in federal interest and participation. For example, federal support has been critical to track money laundering, which is often linked to these operations and in providing interpreter services to question individuals who are arrested, who often appear to have been trafficked and forced to work and live at these sites, under hazardous conditions and don't speak English. bring me up to date on how the FBI is working to address these dangerous grow houses that are operating not just in Maine although we're a particular target, but Oklahoma, California, and other states as well. It's essential that we have support from FBI, from DEA, from Treasury. This has to be an all of government effort. to close these operations down.

1:00:17 – 1:01:16

Senator, I couldn't agree with you more. And what we did, um, since you and I last well, we've spoken in between you last year and this hearing, but the HSTFs that we stood up, the Homeland Security Task Forces that we stood up in fifty-nine locations across the country co-led by DHS and FBI have specifically targeted the marijuana grow house operations especially tied to the Chinese, um, there's two problems there. the Chinese nationals that are doing most of the criminal activity related to grow houses have either severed ties or covered their tracks very well and has led us to be unable to determine their direct connectivity I'm not saying it doesn't exist back to mainland China that's kind of their MO on how they do whether it's grow houses or any other criminal activity so what we're doing with the HSTFs is reverse engineering those programs taking down the grow houses whether they're in Maine or Oklahoma and tracing their banking records and their financial statements to see what we can do with the sanctions program overseas and shut down the financiers of these operations.

1:01:17 – 1:01:26

Do we know where the money is going to? As some law enforcement officers in Maine believe it's tied to the fentanyl trade.

1:01:27 – 1:01:45

Y- yes ma'am, the uh um I I believe as these gentlemen tell you, the the money always goes back into the drug trafficking trade and to the drug traffickers' pockets and so The we're not seeing, I'm not saying it doesn't happen, what we're not seeing yet is the money directly being shipped back over to mainland China and the CCP from these Crow House operations.

1:01:46 – 1:02:09

I would encourage you to even increase your efforts even more because uh this is a, remains a huge problem in Maine despite the valiant efforts of our sheriffs and local law enforcement. Administrator Cole, could you provide an update on DEA's efforts in this area?

1:02:12 – 1:03:54

Yes, ma'am. Yes, Senator. And and we continue to target those specific marijuana traffickers uh in Maine. As of uh recently, we had executed forty-four search warrants um in reference to Chinese underground uh marijuana houses, seized about thirty-two thousand marijuana plants, over five hundred pounds of marijuana, And as we continue to trace the Chinese underground banking system, where the funds are being fueled as the director Patel had said, they're often using crypto as the instantaneous transfer of wealth. And what that requires our skilled investigators to do is to pull those uh findings off the block chain but to specifically look at one, two and three tiers removed to help identify exactly where that those illicit gains are going to. We continue to stay on the offensive. Recently, uh, with our Bangor, uh, main office, um, we've identified up to two hundred and fifty potential locations where this is occurring. So this is ongoing cooperation with our state, local, tribal partners and our federal partners, not only through our efforts, but the efforts of the Homeland Security Task Force that has come together. We will stay on the front foot. We will continue to target and investigate and bring them to justice. Unfortunately, Unfortunately, they are embedded, which requires long-term, complex conspiracy work to continue to eradicate not only the poison of the narcotics, but the environmental dangers that they bring to these grow houses. So we will continue, we will keep you posted, Senator. My team is happy to follow up with your team to give you progress and update reports.

1:03:54 – 1:05:21

Thank you. What I have found is a lot of time The constituents who live near these houses know what's going on. I mean, all of a sudden, the windows are covered, uh, they see people going in and out at odd hours. They can smell, in some cases, the marijuana. These are not the licensed operations that are legal in Maine. These individuals are not following any of the rules. and they are operating illegally and causing tremendous harm. The fact that your latest reporting shows that there's still two hundred fifty houses, and that's probably an underestimate. Um, it shows how incredibly serious this problem is. And again, think of the affordable housing crisis in Maine and Oklahoma and other states. These are houses that become uninhabitable because of the amount of black mold that is usually inside of them. So I hope you will continue the task force effort because this really requires an all of government approach. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

1:05:22 – 1:05:24

Thank you, Senator Collins. Uh, Senator Shaheen.

1:05:25 – 1:06:11

Thank you, Mister Chairman, and thank you to each of our witnesses for being here today. Uh, Director Cole, I'd like to begin with you. And I'm very pleased that the New England Drug Lab, which is located in Londonderry, New Hampshire, has now opened, not officially, but soon. Um, and it's soon gonna start processing samples. But I am concerned about the capaci- staff capacity for that lab. And I understand it's gonna take about fifty full-time personnel once it's fully staffed. Um and it's the eighth regional DEA lab. So can you tell me how many positions the DEA needs to fully staff all of its labs and whether you have requested money in the budget to do that?

1:06:14 – 1:06:23

Senator, thank you for your support of the DEA lab and the funding to go along with it. We are happy to report on time And within budget.

1:06:23 – 1:06:23

Right.

1:06:23 – 1:07:13

Two things you often don't hear in government, but on time and within budget. Um, we are looking forward to, to being the subject matter experts in building that capacity there. Um, chemists, fully on board. We are ready to go. We are currently hiring the fingerprint specialists, uh, that, that are gonna be required. But we're committed to have that lab fully staffed to service the men and women of local, state, and tribal law enforcement as they continue to identify new synthetic strands of opioids that continue to arrive uh in the United States from Mexico that are being fueled by by China. It's important to to realize that as we continue to identify these strands and push out these PSAs, we have a recent PSA, public service announcement, that went out last week regarding three more strands of synthetic opioids. This lab is

1:07:12 – 1:07:26

Yes, we're we're seeing that in New Hampshire and we're very concerned about it. But So you're comfortable that the money that you've requested in the budget would fully staff, not just our lab um in New England, but all of the other seven labs.

1:07:26 – 1:07:47

Yeah, so the great thing about DEA with the chemists, they are the highly fully staffed core series at DEA at at almost ninety-seven percent. We have a class in session right now of seventeen more chemists coming on board, so I'm very confident that we are gonna be uh staffing levels at ninety-eight Ninety nine percent

1:07:47 – 1:07:47

Right.

1:07:47 – 1:07:48

within the next few months. Yes, ma'am.

1:07:49 – 1:09:00

Well, thank you. That's very good news for us and um the New Hampshire delegation is interested in being helpful in any way we can. Um, Director Seralto, I know that you said that at the Marshal service you can't really control much of the work that you have to do, that you have to handle whatever comes your way. But you can control what you request in your budget. And I noticed that your budget requests increased funding of more than a hundred and fifty-two million for immigration-related activities, but only, I think you said, thirty-four million to increase judicial security. And I am concerned that given the increase in um criminal activity against our federal judges that, as you point out, the threats to them are problematic. So can you talk about why the dramatic increase in immigration funding, but only, you know, about a quarter of that to handle judicial security when that's a major aspect of the work that you all do?

1:09:01 – 1:09:40

Thank you, Shan- Senator Shaheen, I appreciate that question. Um, so our immigration ask for a hundred and fifty-two million uh expands the USMS's participation in the Homeland Security Task Forces, um whose mission is to disrupt transnational criminal organizations. Uh it also provides funding to support the USMS's increased workload uh in our traditional missions. So the efforts of our immigration work as a nation uh are going to add to the cost of the martial services um processes.

1:09:40 – 1:10:13

I understand, but we've just passed um billions of dollars for immigration activities and no additional funding in the Republican-passed reconciliation bills to address judicial security and given as you point out the threats to judges across this country, don't you think it might be better to rely on the billions that are in those bills to address immigration and refocus those dollars for the martial service, on judicial security and courthouse security.

1:10:13 – 1:10:27

Well, Senator, I I can tell you the Marshal Service uh uh could use the money for the uh s- security situations with uh our backlog in construction. That that is a big uh number. That's four hundred and eighty-four million dollars.

1:10:28 – 1:10:29

Right, I understand that.

1:10:28 – 1:10:29

Uh, the

1:10:29 – 1:10:34

So who made the determination that you were gonna increase immigration funding by such a large amount?

1:10:34 – 1:11:01

Well, in in staffing the HSTFs, the the President has given us money to be able to staff those HSTFs. Um, so it it is it is so that we don't take away from judicial security. That's why that number's higher. Um, our our judicial security protective operations has uh uh uh gotten a thirty-four million dollar or or the the the budget proposed a thirty-four million dollar addition addition.

1:11:01 – 1:11:07

No, I understand, but the hundred and fifty-two million I understood was also an addition. Uh, my time is up. Thank you, Mister Chairman.

1:11:08 – 1:11:10

Thank you, Senator. Uh, Senator Graham.

1:11:11 – 1:11:17

Uh, thank you. Uh, Mr. Cole, what would you say to anybody who wanted to abolish the DEA?

1:11:23 – 1:11:50

Well, I would have them take a look at our direct workflow. Currently, where last year we seized close to seven fifty-seven million fentanyl pills in the United States close to nine hundred million dollars in US currency that came from drug traffickers, uh, the, the foreign footprint that we currently have, you would have cartel members celebrating all over the world, designated terrorists celebrating all over the world that the DEA was gone.

1:11:49 – 1:12:19

So, that's a good answer. So terrorists and drug cartels would be celebrating. Um, so I just wanna say to the p- men and women of the DEA, thank you. I think you make our lives infinitely safer. You're doing things that most of us wouldn't wanna do and in the shadows, so I just wanted to get on the record uh my view that you're you perform a very important function. Uh Director Patel, when you look at the threat streams against our country, are they going up or down?

1:12:20 – 1:12:49

The threat streams um over the last year in general have gone up over the last few years, which is why you've seen the resulting amount of violent criminal arrest. If we're arresting forty four thousand people, which is twice as many as the year before, that's because there's a lot of violent criminals running around America. But the good news is that the FBI, along with these men and their agencies, are doing the work in arresting people at record levels, gangbangers, narcotics traffickers, sex traffickers, terrorists, and those that pose the greatest threat to our national security.

1:12:50 – 1:12:56

Uh, during the Biden years, uh, they say eleven to fifteen million illegal immigrants came into the country. Are you familiar with that reporting?

1:12:57 – 1:12:57

Yes, sir.

1:12:58 – 1:13:00

So what are we supposed to do? Just ignore it?

1:13:01 – 1:13:01

Well

1:13:01 – 1:13:03

I you you don't wanna ignore it, do you?

1:13:04 – 1:13:05

Not at the FBI, no, sir.

1:13:05 – 1:13:11

Good. I mean, you if you had eleven to fifteen million people coming in legally, you'd wanna push back. Do you agree with that?

1:13:12 – 1:13:18

Absolutely. We have pushed back. Actually, we've reduced filing crime in every single fifty, every one of our fifty states by an average of ten points.

1:13:18 – 1:14:12

Yeah, so you gotta plus up the resources to deal with what happened, what I would consider a virtual invasion of our country by illegal immigrants. And to all of you on the front lines, thank you. I mean, the idea that we wouldn't wanna do that astounds me. I mean, we gotta get you know, control over our country again. Um, Director Patel, when it comes to systems, do you think the country would be well served, have a law like I'm proposing, called Logan's Law, that would require states to report to the Attorney General of the United States the results of all cases involving violent crime where you could get six months or more to include the charge and the plea bargain so we'd know better about soft-on-crime prosecutors and judges?

1:14:12 – 1:14:29

That bill is critical to providing the information that we at the FBI house at our criminal justice information center um Sieges property in West Virginia we are only as good as the data we're given we don't go out and proactively and legally obtain that data from our partner enforcement agencies across the country.

1:14:29 – 1:14:31

So you would support Logan's law on requirements?

1:14:31 – 1:14:32

Absolutely. We we need it.

1:14:32 – 1:14:42

Yeah, I think so too. And um the man who in Cambridge, Massachusetts who shot at a bunch of drivers, he he'd had a long criminal record. Are you familiar with that?

1:14:42 – 1:14:42

Yes, sir.

1:14:42 – 1:14:48

As a matter of fact, while he was on probation, he shot at police officers and not much happened to him. You're familiar with that?

1:14:49 – 1:14:49

Yes, sir.

1:14:49 – 1:14:56

Do you agree we need to break the cycle of catch and release and look in the other way when it comes to violent crime in this country?

1:14:56 – 1:15:00

I think catch and release is the number one cause of recidivist violent crime in the

1:15:02 – 1:15:05

Okay. When it comes to the FBI, how's morale?

1:15:06 – 1:15:06

I'm sorry?

1:15:07 – 1:15:08

How's your morale at the FBI?

1:15:08 – 1:15:28

Morale has never been better. When I go across the country and I talk to the line agents and the intelligence analysts and professional staff I travel around the country, I talk to our state and local partners, they tell me one thing resoundingly, we're finally going to do the work that we were asked to do with the resources that we needed to get the job done. And that's what this administration is focused on, and that's why you're seeing the results that we talked about.

1:15:28 – 1:15:37

Uh, Mr. Cole, do you think we're seeing dividends from your focus on illegal drugs and cartels and all the above?

1:15:39 – 1:15:54

Absolutely, Senator. And we will stay on the offensive, whether it's taking Nicolas Maduro out of Venezuela or capturing the next Chapo or helping coordinate the next mental operation, we will continue to target those foreign terrorists that are killing Americans.

1:15:55 – 1:16:04

Do you agree that the Maduro operation not only was flawless, sent a new message that a new sheriff's in town and created deterrence we haven't had before.

1:16:04 – 1:16:16

I think it sent one great message to everybody in the Western hemisphere, and to dictators and foreign terrorists around the world, that they will help be held accountable for sending this poison to the US.

1:16:16 – 1:16:17

Thank you all very much.

1:16:18 – 1:16:19

Senator Coons.

1:16:22 – 1:17:32

Thank you. Uh, thank you, Madam Chair. Um, thank you. Uh, Chair Moran, Ranking Member Van Hollen, um Senator Murkowski, um and I appreciate uh each of our witnesses for being here today. Uh during National Police Week I just wanted to express uh my particular appreciation uh for the men and women of each of your agencies uh when I was County Executive I was responsible for the second largest law enforcement agency in our state and our partnerships uh with Marshall's ATF, DEI, DEA, FBI and many other uh elements of federal law enforcement were really critical to our investigations. uh and working to advance security in in my home community. Uh in just the last few months uh the New Castle County Police have worked with the FBI to arrest a suspect who had both plans and weapons to carry out a mass shooting at the University of Delaware. I worked with DEA uh to investigate methamphetamine distributors, worked with the Marshal's Service to arrest a suspect uh with a warrant out for attempted murder. These are just a few brief examples. I have other topics to get to, but if each of you could just briefly tell me Um, what are your plans for strengthening your partnerships with local law enforcement? And what more do you need from Congress to execute on those plans? Director Patel.

1:17:33 – 1:17:37

Thank you, Senator. One thing we need, always need more of is data from state and local.

1:17:37 – 1:17:37

Hmm.

1:17:37 – 1:17:51

Anything we can do from a legislative perspective at the federal, state level to get us that data, so we can ingest the data and get it back out to our partners, that's critical. Um, what we're doing to expand, um, at specifically at the FBI, for the first time ever we stood up our LEPIC,

1:18:15 – 1:18:26

Senator, Senator, more connectivity to our state, more connectivity to our state, local and tribal partners is local, and tribal partners is the utmost support at DEA do with the uh significant change in the landscape with synthetic opioids,

1:18:26 – 1:18:26

Mm-hmm.

1:18:26 – 1:18:38

with more methamphetamine pills coming in, more cocaine coming in. It's important that those state and local counterparts, the men and women uh that are on the front lines every single day have the same intelligence and the same information that the DEA does.

1:18:39 – 1:18:39

Mm.

1:18:39 – 1:18:43

Part of this is coming from our capacity to build foreign partnerships.

1:18:43 – 1:18:43

Mm-hmm.

1:18:43 – 1:18:52

The amount of foreign partnerships and people we have down range in Mexico and Colombia that intel is critical to the beat officer that's working in rural areas.

1:18:52 – 1:18:53

Yep.

1:18:52 – 1:19:00

So we have to continue to be better partners, continue to be more engaged, and respond when they call for help to address violent criminal activity.

1:18:59 – 1:19:42

Okay. Director Shireltzer, I'm gonna interrupt myself. I appreciate uh the work that you and the Marshal's Service do to keep federal judges safe, uh but there's thousands of state and local judges who don't have the same intelligence network, the same resources. I'm proud to cosponsor a bill with Senator John Cornyn creates would create a new state judicial threat intelligence and resource center. Uh, it would provide security assessments for local courts, uh, and help local law enforcement make assessments about how to keep judges' homes safe, uh, and how to keep, uh, court personnel safe. It's passed the Senate unanimously. Um, do you have any opinion about whether or not the House should take it up? Uh, and whether or not partnering with state and local, uh, court systems would help advance judicial security in this country.

1:19:45 – 1:20:12

Senator, thank you. Thank you for your work on that. Uh, my my opinion would be is that any judge that we can keep safe, whether they be in state or the federal uh uh bench, we should keep safe. Um, to that end, I'll tell you, the judges make decisions that are life-changing, um, sometimes to themselves. So fifty percent of the time, someone is upset with the judge's decision, right?

1:20:12 – 1:20:12

Yep.

1:20:12 – 1:20:22

whether they win or lose. And that's something that we need to keep in mind. The justices, judges, the judiciary is are the pillars of our country.

1:20:22 – 1:20:47

I look forward to working with you on uh protecting and promoting judicial security. Director Patel, um reauthorization of section seven O two uh is something I've previously grappled with um but we've not heard at all uh from officials uh from the FBI or the other intelligence agencies um testifying about the proposed eighteen month clean extension. Were you invited by Chairman Grassley to testify before our committee about section seven O two?

1:20:48 – 1:21:01

I, what I recall, senators, that I've been uh we in the FBI team have been providing briefings pursuant to the chairman's request. So we've done at least a dozen um in the Senate and at least half a dozen or more in the House including myself and Director Ratcliffe personally.

1:21:02 – 1:21:31

Okay. Um, I have not participated in or benefited from any of those briefings. Um, and Doing oversight on the reforms uh that were put in place and how closely they're being followed is critical uh to my concluding whether or not I'll vote for an extension. Um, Director, I just I have to ask you one last question. Um, y- you attended uh the Olympics uh in Milan. Um, how much did your trip cost and to what extent did that help uh you carry out your mission uh as Director of the FBI?

1:21:31 – 1:22:03

I greatly appreciate the question, Senator. As you know, the FBI and DHS are responsible. for the security of the Olympics, the World Cup, the F one, the Super Bowl and everything else. We had two hundred and fifty thousand Americans travel to Milan, we're proud that we stood up our jock there and had zero major security incidences of all American citizens. And what we did was we purposely planned that trip around the Olympics because as I mentioned in my opening the top cyber criminal from the CCP was housed in Italian custody with it while there we were able to work an agreement and arrangement to have that individual

1:22:15 – 1:22:46

I was concerned that just before we went to war with Iran, a whole group of FBI uh agents were terminated, um about ten who were reportedly uh analysts with expertise in handling Iranian counterterrorism, fluent in Farsi, long experienced. Um I know there's ongoing litigation, but have you replaced them? Was there a reason for their dismissal? Um, do we have the capabilities we need to protect the United States while there's an ongoing war in Iran?" The public reporting as to the reasons for their dismissal, I found deeply troubling.

1:22:47 – 1:23:05

Well, as I've as I've addressed earlier, s- I don't believe the public reporting's accurate. What we did do for the first time in FBI history is stand up the Iran Threats Mission Center. Um, that is housed inside the FBI with our Iran experts, including intelligence analysts and agents, And we have seen a forty-seven percent increase in the arrest of Iranian spies.

1:23:05 – 1:23:10

Do you disagree that there were ten Iran specialists dismissed right before the war began?

1:23:11 – 1:23:11

Yes.

1:23:12 – 1:23:13

Senator Hagerty.

1:23:18 – 1:24:52

Thank you, and I want to thank all of you here today to testify, and particularly I want to thank your staffs uh for what they do for our nation and um more importantly I want to thank you f- from the Tennessee, uh, specifically what you've done for the people of Memphis. Just very, very much appreciate your efforts. I'd like to talk with you all about how this administration is making America safer and how it's demonstrated its capacity through its transformative impact on crime in a great city, Memphis, Tennessee. Memphis boasts a rich cultural history, wonderful people and community leaders that are dedicated to their city. It's a hub for major logistics and medical device manufacturing, and it's now also home to advanced technologies like XAI. But it's been troubled by serious violent crime. Director Patel, I remember in December of twenty twenty four, we had a conversation about how Memphis needed an all hands approach uh to to deal with this this situation and and I asked you at that point when you were contemplating coming in to run the FBI, if if we could get help from the world's most sophisticated law enforcement agency to revitalize the city of Memphis. And you were um overwhelmingly supportive of that and I can't tell you how much I appreciate it in fact I was so honored to host you in the spring of twenty twenty five in Tennessee as we let unfold the plan that would actually help uh rescue Memphis. And it later became the the Memphis Safe Task Force, uh but it started out under the radar with the efforts that you've put in place, and I I thought I would just get you to expand to the to the for the benefit of this committee, uh the efforts of the task force, um how it was ultimately supported and how it laid the blueprint for again becoming the Memphis Safe Task Force that we've seen today.

1:24:52 – 1:25:30

Well, you're absolutely right, Senator. It was an inter-agency lift. by the task force that's led by these gentlemen here on this committee, uh working relentlessly to safeguard not just Memphis but places like Washington. But I thank you for highlighting the FBI's work. Before um the task force was stood up, the FBI launched Op Vi Operation Viper and Operation Summer Heat. And what we did is launch and deploy and surge assets across the state of Tennessee, but specifically in Memphis, to cripple the localized street gangs, the firearms capabilities and drug trades that were just everywhere. And um for those that don't know, I know you know it, Memphis had the highest per capita homicide rate in the country. And now it's uh we've reduced that by I think fifty four percent.

1:25:30 – 1:25:31

Yeah.

1:25:31 – 1:25:50

So what we did was we set the ground, we set this phase zero one operations with the FBI on the ground. And thanks to the brilliant leadership of um of uh Director Seralta and the President's task force we completed that mission. We're doing Operation Viper in twenty four separate states, cuz we wanna replicate what we did in Tennessee to ev- everywhere else.

1:25:49 – 1:25:49

Mm-hmm.

1:25:50 – 1:25:55

And so we're we're welcome to partner up with anyone that wants to replicate that.

1:25:54 – 1:26:12

I I applaud that. I I I'd just like to say though, uh seeing the great success and I know more to come, but but to make certain that it's permanent, Director Patel, um I wanna make certain that you've got the resources and the the flexibility that you need from this committee to make that happen. Do do anything that you'd like to advise us, you'd like to see to achieve that objective?

1:26:12 – 1:26:29

Well, thanks to you and the leadership in Tennessee, we just opened up our new um office in uh Memphis to permanently assure the citizens of Tennessee that we're not going anywhere, and the budget request enhancements that we've put in place will allow us to hire the agents that we need to fill those billets across the country.

1:26:29 – 1:26:53

Yeah, that that's a that's a nice reversal from previous policy. Thank you. And thanks for all of the effort. Director Sirvalds, I'd like to turn to you. Um, certainly things didn't stop with the FBI's crime task force. That effort laid the groundwork for the president to issue an executive order establishing Memphis safe. Director, given your direct involvement, can you walk me through the results of Memphis Safe Task Force from your perspective and where you see it going from here.

1:26:55 – 1:28:03

Thank you, Senator. Thank thanks. Thanks to your support and that of uh your colleagues and and uh and local government there as well. Um, it it's been highly successful. So the president's decisive action in Memphis uh proves that when federal government partners with local government leaders, we can turn the tide against failed experiments in criminal justice reform. and make America safe again. Uh since launching uh on on August first, twenty twenty five, and as of April thirtieth, twenty twenty six, I am pleased to report that the operation has yielded eight thousand seven hundred and one total arrests by federal officers, averaging forty per day, including sixty four for homicide, nine hundred and fifty seven for narcotics, and seven hundred and ninety one for firearms violations. We've seized thousand four hundred and twenty-six illegal firearms in Memphis alone, an average of six per day that could have fueled more shootings, assaults or worse in that city.

1:28:04 – 1:28:39

I'm looking actually at one of the records. We had a daily report on this and I would commend this to uh to my colleagues. This is amazing work that you're doing. Th thank you, director, I I hate to cut you short, but I I I just would like to ask you one other question. It's it's a glaring example to me, when you have cooperation from a state, from a city, what can happen in the results that you just went through, dramatic improvement. Rather than calling our law enforcement Gestapo, like we've heard in some other parts of America, we've embraced the help and and the results have been dramatic. And I'd just like you to t- share with us the response you've received from the people of Memphis.

1:28:40 – 1:29:55

So it's thirty-one agencies working together, that include state and local. uh in federal and the operation has had significant positive impact uh on the lives of the Memphis residents the city residents uh and visitors are now uh visiting the downtown area uh local businesses are rallying back um there's been large scale public events uh have also shown improved safety outcomes uh that was demonstrated in December with the with the St. Jude marathon Um which hosted about twenty two thousand runners and not a single burglary um was reported that day. Um and that's different than compared to other years. Perhaps the most telling is one of our uh uh sp- special assistant United States attorneys recently reported that a traveling emergency room doctor expressed his appreciation for the task for what the task force has done. He said that in recent years past, he would have approximately three to five gunshot wound victims per shift. And now he sees an average of one gunshot victim every three or four shifts.

1:29:56 – 1:29:57

It's dramatic.

1:29:57 – 1:30:15

We've made a a an amazing impact and the fiscal year twenty twenty seven president's budget request includes a vital program increase for us, seventy six million dollars uh for two hundred positions. This is to have that that staying power that you were talking about earlier with with Director Patel.

1:30:15 – 1:30:32

Thank you, Director Sralta. I just wanna say again, I wanna thank all of the employees of the thirty-one agencies that have made Memphis safe again. It's an example that I hope um my my colleagues here on the on on the committee will will look to and say this is a true example of where cooperation can make a difference here in America and you have transformed a city for us.

1:30:32 – 1:30:33

Senator Murray.

1:30:35 – 1:30:36

Thank you very much.

1:30:36 – 1:30:38

Manners, thank you for joining us, uh Vice Chairwoman.

1:30:38 – 1:30:39

No worries.

1:30:39 – 1:30:40

Uh, and I appreciate your presence.

1:30:40 – 1:31:28

Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman, Director Patel, um, I want to start by recognizing important work by the FBI to crack down on fraud. In one case the FBI helped bring justice multiple former business owners who orchestrated a two hundred and five million dollar Medicare fraud scheme on the American people and those business owners filed nearly a million false claims for services that they never provided any patience, literally stealing from American taxpayers and preying on vulnerable who were suffering from Alzheimer's and dementia and substance abuse. But thanks to the FBI, um, those crooks were held accountable. So I just wanted to ask you today if you would pass along my gratitude to those FBI agents for their tireless work bringing those criminals to justice.

1:31:28 – 1:31:31

I will, ma'am, the fraud work is often overlooked and I greatly appreciate that.

1:31:31 – 1:32:45

And very important, but I do have to say, unfortunately, President Trump, the guy who says he's going after fraud, granted this man Lawrence Duran clemency last June. He was set free and let off the hook for the eighty-seven million dollars he owed in restitution and Trump glanted granted clemency to Duran's business partner last February cutting well short her thirty-five year prison tomb. He literally undid the important justice work the FBI served and let fraudsters off the the hook, and I find that deeply disturbing. Um, with that, I I wanna say I I I wanna take a moment to reiterate reiterate the important role of DOJ law enforcement in keeping all of us safe. Those agents and deputy marshals are absolutely critical to making sure public safety and solving crime. But I worry that instead of pursuing these child abusers or terrorists or drug traffickers or other criminals you have our agents spending time carrying out Stephen Miller's mass deportation agenda and harassing families and children. I want to ask you, Director Patel, how many FBI agents have been reassigned to work on immigration enforcement?

1:32:46 – 1:32:49

No one at the FBI has been reassigned to work solely on immigration, ma'am.

1:32:50 – 1:34:17

Well, uh, I would differ with you because according to the Cato Institute, more than two thousand FBI agents were reassigned to work on immigration enforcement in twenty twenty five. By the way, it's not just the FBI. More than two thousand agents from the DEA, more than six hundred from the Marshal service, and more than one thousand ATF agents are spending their time on immigration enforcement. That has really pulled critical, highly trained assets off of work to keep our community safe from drugs and guns and other threats. And I find that deeply disturbing. Um, now, Director Patel, I wanna ask you about um a number of extremely troubling troubling stories recently about your leadership and temperament and what's happened uh to the FBI with you at the top, and in response to all the concerns about your leadership, instead of writing the ship, you've taken to polygraphing your employees to scare them and attempt to rat out leakers. There are reports that you're using FBI resources to investigate journalists for reporting what's going on, and that is a- absolutely not what this committee intended. when we funded the bureau. So can you commit to this committee today that no agent ours have been pulled from other work like counterterrorism or violent cr- crime investigations to work on matters related to negative press about you or your personal lawsuit?

1:34:18 – 1:34:33

Senator, I greatly appreciate the question, and I continue unequivocally, this FBI is targeting and investigating no journalists. This FBI is targeting no journalists. The Obama and Biden administrations targeted dozens of journalists, sent out twelve hundred interviews,

1:34:33 – 1:34:36

I didn't ask you about the Biden administration.

1:34:34 – 1:34:35

and

1:34:36 – 1:34:38

I asked if you can commit to this committee

1:34:36 – 1:34:36

Well

1:34:38 – 1:34:40

that no age and hours have been pulled from other work.

1:34:41 – 1:34:42

We have not done so.

1:34:43 – 1:34:50

Okay, well, there are reports that are using S FBI resource to investigate journalists. You are saying to this committee today that that is not true.

1:34:51 – 1:34:51

That's correct, ma'am.

1:34:53 – 1:36:12

Okay, well, let me let me just say w Director Patel, we need a serious budget. But we also need serious leadership. And I will say this, there is one clear priority in Trump's overall budget, and it isn't law and order, it is war. Because while Trump is proposing cuts to programs that really do keep people safe, he wants to increase war spending by half a trillion dollars. And I don't need to tell anyone here we are not gonna bomb our way to safer communities. So I intend to help rip that budget up. and write bills that ha- keep families safe. But - but beyond that budget, we need serious leadership at the FBI that the American people can trust. And I am deeply concerned about the reports that your leadership has not been serious. We need somebody at this agency who's focused on solving criminal cases, not passing out branded bourbon or jetting around the globe. Your job is to be reachable. And I know Senator Van Hollen asked you about this. Um, but I gotta say, if you wanna pass out liquor or pop bottles in a locker room, stick to podcasting, leave law and order to people who really do care about justice in appearances. That is really critical. And it's what's I am really deeply concerned about, and so are many people. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

1:36:12 – 1:36:13

Can I respond?

1:36:12 – 1:36:15

Sure. Sure.

1:36:17 – 1:37:10

This is what real leadership looks like at the FBI. Every one of you was given it. This is what's happened under my tenure at the FBI in the Trump administration. Twenty point drop in the homicide rate. Forty five thousand violent offenders arrested last year, twice as many as twenty twenty four. Twenty four hundred and fifty criminal gangs disrupted, that's a three hundred and twenty two percent increase from twenty twenty four. Sixty nine hundred trial victims have been located since I've been in the seat, that's a hundred and forty four percent increase. Twenty nine hundred child predators and human traffickers arrested, that's a seventy percent increase. And we've arrested eight of the top ten most wanted fugitives in the world in fourteen months. That's twice as many in the four years combined. That is what the men and women of the FBI are doing, well-resourced. Everyone should take a look at this. If people wanna continue the baseless, fraudulent, false personal attacks at me, that's great. Keep the target on me, as I've always said, but the mission has never been better.

1:37:10 – 1:37:12

Mister Chairman, if I could just respond to notes.

1:37:11 – 1:37:12

Senator Murray.

1:37:12 – 1:37:33

Um, I appreciate the work of our FBI agents, but leadership, serious leadership is a concern, and we are seeing the pictures of passing out branded bourbon and what happened at the Olympics and jetting around the globe and all the rest of it and that I will say again, Mister Chairman, is of deep concern to me. Thank you Mister Chairman.

1:37:33 – 1:37:34

Thank you. Senator Fischer.

1:37:35 – 1:38:13

Thank you Mister Chairman and thank you gentlemen for being here today. I'd like to begin with the agency that you lead, Director Patel. Over the past decade or so the FBI has come under intense unjustified scrutiny for perceived and actual misuse of agency personnel and resources for political objectives. Director Patel, what steps have you taken to refocus the Bureau to its core missions of counterterrorism and counterintelligence on federal law enforcement and on criminal justice?

1:38:13 – 1:39:02

Thank you, Senator. I think the weaponization of law enforcement that you spoke of uh was caused by the centralization of the FBI in the National Capital Region. What I mean by that is before I got in this seat, over one third of the entire FBI workforce was located in the National Capital Region. When I got here, I put a thousand agents into the field permanently. Every single state got more agents than they've ever had. Behind that, I sent three hundred intelligence analysts into the field permanently. Behind that, I sent five hundred support staff and program managers into the field permanently. And that's only a conus. We've also expanded our overseas footprint. So decentralizing the bureaucracy of Washington, removing the red tape in the bureaucracy, putting agents in the field, in Nebraska and everywhere else is how we're getting the mission done, and no one at this FBI is allowed to politicize or weaponize law enforcement. If you do, you don't get to work there anymore.

1:39:03 – 1:39:44

Thank you. Uh, we all know that our country faces mounting and increasingly complex threats to our homeland from foreign adversaries, and domestic operatives who are acting on behalf of these malign foreign interests. These adversaries have seized on several recent global conflicts to try and undermine America's geopolitical interests by sowing fear and dissension here at home. The FBI is tasked with investigating foreign and domestic threats to the United States. Director, can you tell us how is the Bureau coordinating with other federal, state, and

1:39:53 – 1:40:45

What we've done specifically with the Homeland Security Task Force in fifty-nine separate locations is bring in every single agency into one roof and centralize the collected intelligence that they all piece together with their state and local partners that's critical to the mission set. We've also done things like stand up the C-four, the counter-coronation fusion cell, um in Southwest Arizona, specifically targeting the drug trade with embedded DOD on a DOD facility, a DOW facility. So we're leveraging all capabilities across the board. Our CI and CT work could not be stronger. We have two thousand terrorism cases at the FBI. Our CI work has expanded, not gone down. As I've said, we've arrested forty-four percent more espionage actors from China, Russia and the DPRK and Iran alone. And we're doing that because the inter-agency, including the intel community, is finally providing us with ways to turn information and intel into evidence that we can use in a court of law.

1:40:46 – 1:40:51

Thank you, director, and please thank the members of the FBI for me as well.

1:40:50 – 1:40:50

Yes, ma'am.

1:40:52 – 1:41:51

Um, Administrator Cole, from the Chinese precursor chemicals to the cartel-facilitated cross-border smuggling efforts, the global supply chain undergirding that illicit drug trade has posed a serious challenge for federal law enforcement. And the DEA and other federal agencies have made outstanding progress in exposing and disrupting various aspects of this often opaque and disturbingly well-resourced network. Administrator, I was on a co-deal with the chairman of this subcommittee in China, and uh the precursors to fentanyl is something that we brought up to various officials in the Chinese government. Have you have you seen a change uh in in the illicit drug trade in in recent years, and especially with uh with your time at the agencies? What what are we seeing on the ground?

1:41:53 – 1:42:31

At the ground level, the teams are working extremely well, uh not only in China, uh under the ambassador's leadership, but as we continue to target the Mexican cartels, Sinaloa and CGNG, We we need to make sure that we keep an eye on the northern border as well. We see more precursors coming into the port of Vancouver, coming into Canada, and the Canadians through with the Mexican cartels in country has started producing and manufacturing fentanyl in Canada. In the last two months there's been significant seizures of fentanyl in Canada.

1:42:31 – 1:42:33

Do they cross our country to get there?

1:42:34 – 1:42:37

They they they arrive at the por- port of Vancouver and then they

1:42:34 – 1:42:37

How did they arrive in there? Okay.

1:42:37 – 1:42:58

transition through Canada to the different source locations for manufacturing production and then it comes across our northern border. It's something that everybody at this table is worried about. We continue to keep the pressure on China, on India, continue to target the leadership in the cartels, but very conscious of what's going on in the northern border as well.

1:42:59 – 1:43:01

Thank you, and thank you all for the work that you do.

1:43:02 – 1:43:02

Thank you.

1:43:02 – 1:43:03

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

1:43:08 – 1:43:08

Senator Reid.

1:43:10 – 1:43:25

Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman, uh Director Sacata, you've been neglected, I can't let that go. Uh first of all, let me thank you for your, I calculate, twenty years of service in the ATF and pride of that as a police officer in New York and Plainville, Florida?

1:43:26 – 1:43:27

And Plantation, Florida, yes sir.

1:43:27 – 1:43:28

Plantation, close enough.

1:43:28 – 1:43:28

Yep.

1:43:29 – 1:44:35

But uh I wanna focus on uh those devices which trans- turn, transform a semi-automatic rifle into an automatic rifle. Uh for many years the federal government took the position that forced reset triggers were in fact illegal, uh and yet there was a case uh in which in twenty twenty five the DOJ reversed itself and they s- essentially by their reversal allowed these forced reset triggers to become legal. And all you have to do is buy one, find one, uh l- go to YouTube, look at the YouTube. Uh, takes about two minutes to put it in the weapon, and now you're firing at about uh th- thirty rounds uh in four seconds, which my experience, and I did professionally uh carry an M-sixteen, is that's an automatic weapon. What are we gonna do to prevent uh these types of devices from getting out and raising the threat to the public?

1:44:36 – 1:45:15

Good afternoon, Senator. Thank you for your question. Uh I think uh just to stay uh uh focused on the topic of machine gun conversion devices, they come in all shapes and forms. Uh some uh refer to as uh switches as they are sometimes put into semi-automatic pistols to convert from semi-automatic to full. uh automatic drop-in auto-seers uh for rifles. Uh and uh ATF has been dealing with an issue uh related to this for many, many years. Uh the technology has made uh this proliferate much easier because many of these are either three D printed now, uh or manufactured uh in China and uh shipped to

1:45:15 – 1:45:15

Mm.

1:45:15 – 1:45:47

the United States by uh the container load in some cases. Um as it relates to the forced reset trigger, I'd like to answer that uh question. That uh that particular uh type of device uh was uh uh litigated and uh settled uh with the Department of Justice uh not too long ago um I won't be able to comment too much on that specific settlement with the Department of Justice uh but it relates to the forced reset trigger itself uh there are many other types of devices that uh convert uh

1:45:42 – 1:45:42

Hmm.

1:45:47 – 1:46:11

firearms to shoot from semi-automatic to full auto uh what we are doing uh with our partners uh state, partners or federal partners and our agents uh the devices that have already been determined to be uh uh uh drop-in auto-seers um other conversion devices, they remain the same. Uh this uh settlement relates specifically to the forced reset trigger made by rare bee rare breed.

1:46:10 – 1:46:11

Yeah.

1:46:11 – 1:46:22

Uh and I think there's a misconception that this applies to all uh types of trigger packs that are out there that increase uh the rate of fire uh that do not operate in the same way.

1:46:39 – 1:46:51

Yeah, the Washington Post reported that the ATF's chief counsel, Rob Leder, objected to the settlement and reportedly thought that, quote, " the devices are dangerous and the classification of machine guns should stand."

1:46:51 – 1:46:51

Mm.

1:46:52 – 1:47:05

Uh Did did you or your predecessor object to the uh the finding? Or and uh is Mister Lieder's objection sound? He's an expert in the lore of machine guns.

1:47:06 – 1:47:28

Yeah, I think uh, sir, that this is a uh a matter that Mister Leiter found to be a very technically nuanced issue in the way that Trigger operates. Uh there's uh uh it's a little bit challenging to explain here in the in this uh room, but I think if we were able to demonstrate the way they operate. Um, as compared to a switch like a drop-in auto sear, there's a clear difference,

1:47:27 – 1:47:28

Mm-hmm.

1:47:28 – 1:47:33

and I think that's where we found uh room for the settlement that Mr. Leder participated in.

1:47:32 – 1:47:59

Well, I would s- I would suggest that you're looking at the the wrong criteria. In my view, uh based on again carrying an M sixteen, it's the rate of fire, it's not the construction of the sear where it's a trigger effect. And when you have a rate of fire of thirty s- thirty rounds in four seconds, that's an automatic weapon. And I think that's the way you should characterize uh your your weapons. If you need congressional support, please call me, go ahead.

1:47:58 – 1:48:01

I, if I may uh sir, I think uh

1:48:00 – 1:48:00

Yeah.

1:48:01 – 1:48:08

uh I understand where you're coming from and the rate of fire unfortunately is not what the statute uh defines uh the machine gun might.

1:48:08 – 1:48:13

Well, we should change the statute. So uh thank you very much.

1:48:12 – 1:48:12

Thank you, sir.

1:48:14 – 1:48:15

Senator Britt.

1:48:15 – 1:50:08

Mister Chairman, thank you so much. I wanna thank all of our witnesses for being here today. Director Patel, I'd like to start with you. I wanna just highlight some of the great work that the FBI has done in Alabama. So, over the last year, we have seen the Bureau oversee the arrest of one thousand one hundred and eighty-seven criminals. We have seen you seize thirty-one kilograms of cocaine and over three grams of fentanyl. If you look over just the last four months alone, you have arrested a hundred and fifty-two criminals, fifteen of which have crimes with related to human trafficking or crimes against children and that includes a two-week operation Operation Southern Star in Montgomery Alabama which was an inter-agency operation where I believe you had sixty-three arrest fifty-two guns um recovered and forty, drug seizures. As a resident of Montgomery and as someone who is raising her children there, I wanna say thank you. Um, on behalf of me, on behalf of all the moms and dads that are that are raising their family there and behalf of our community we say thank you. And I know that this is not just Alabama where you're doing this, you're doing this across the country. It is why the FBI has overseen um the largest uh dip in recorded murders in in in history. I just wanna thank you and I think it is also why you have asked for a significant increase when it comes to actually returning to your mission of putting criminals behind bars I completely support that request and just want you to kind of expand what that would do um can you talk about how that increase would help you continue the good work that you're doing in Alabama um going after criminals, violent criminals, cartels and others and of course across the country as well.

1:50:07 – 1:50:35

Y Thank you, Senator. Um, uh, I'll I will pass on your kind words to the workforce for sure. They're greatly appreciated. We're doing two things, as I s- discussed earlier, um, decentralizing Washington DC and putting human capital in the field. And in order to keep back-filling that human capital, we need more. So we need to take on the, um, outdated onboarding pipeline program at Quantico. We've seen the BFTC, our Quantico graduation classes, increase since I've been,

1:50:34 – 1:50:34

Great.

1:50:35 – 1:50:54

um, in this spot because It used to take over fourteen months to get in and we've shrunk that by over four months. We haven't lowered the standards, we just eliminated the wait time after a paperwork application was put in. But what we also need to do is work with our state and local folks in the field and provide them with the advanced training capabilities they need,

1:50:54 – 1:50:54

Mm-hmm.

1:50:54 – 1:51:27

specifically for instance the drone program capability. We launched the first ever of its kind for state and locals ever in the history of the US, a drone, a counter-UAS program down at the Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville, Alabama. We've graduated sixty five state cops from that um program. The wait list is long. Every single agency across the country wants their police officers there because they want them there for the World Cup they want them there for sporting events they want them there for counter-narcotics so the enhancements we've requested specifically relate to Arsenal uh Redstone Arsenal, our advanced training capabilities, including our cyber center,

1:51:26 – 1:51:26

Yeah.

1:51:27 – 1:51:41

our TDAC school, and we're the only ones in the world that have a ballistic research facility that's housed at Redstone Arsenal that's how we train the next generation of law enforcement officials, and we need more seats, more humans in the seats that we have.

1:51:41 – 1:52:30

Wonderful. Well, I hope that we will continue to support that. I know the work that you're doing there um is cutting edge, and it is also preparing us for what's to come. So thank you, and thank the men and women who work alongside you for making all of this happen. Um, Director Cicada, I know that we discussed at your confirmation hearing the great work the ATF is doing to combat the flow of illicit Chinese vapes. into our nation, and I I also know um uh Director S um Suralta that the Marshall service was involved in some of the recent seizures, that we saw as well. These unsafe product par products target kids in many instances, and I think we have got to put a stop to this. Can you discuss how you think that your budget request for these agencies is going to allow you to enhance your efforts in the space and get get get these off um, off of our streets?

1:52:31 – 1:53:13

Good afternoon, Senator. Thank you for your question. Uh, as as you mentioned, uh, Director Sor- Soralta, myself, Director Cole uh, Administrator Cole, I'm sorry, uh, and our partners at the FDA uh, are working uh hand in hand to identify these wholesalers and retailers that are dealing in these illicit vapes. Uh, but we are uh uh a I could speak for ATF. We are very short-staffed as far as our agents go, and our agents are primar- primarily focused on the violent crime efforts that we're making around the country. Uh and the the uh although uh we are greatly appreciative of the President's uh proposed budget for twenty twenty seven uh that budget maintains current services it doesn't allow for expansion uh into uh other areas

1:53:13 – 1:53:13

Mm-hmm.

1:53:14 – 1:53:19

uh so uh we would love to uh have more agents to focus on this effort in particular

1:53:17 – 1:53:18

Great.

1:53:19 – 1:53:23

uh but it's uh very challenging uh for us to do so with the budget that we have.

1:53:23 – 1:53:40

Absolutely, and I am out of time. I just want to associate myself with the Chairman's comments with regards to the martial services and the protection that we provide our um our judges from our justices to our circuit court, to our DJs, we need to make sure that um they have you have the resources you need to keep them safe. Thank you.

1:53:41 – 1:53:41

Thank you, Senator.

1:53:42 – 1:53:43

Senator Burt, thank you. Senator Peters?

1:53:44 – 1:55:13

Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and uh to our witnesses here today, thank you. Uh thank you to each of you for the work that you do uh every day, uh especially d- during National uh Police Week as we all uh gather here, so again thank you. Director Patel Uh, we we are now uh more than two months uh into a war with uh Iran, a leading sponsor uh of terrorism. And we have already seen at least uh three terrorist attacks uh related to that war, including one uh at Temple Israel in West Bloomfield uh Michigan, where a Hezbollah-inspired attacker rammed a a vehicle uh into a synagogue, holding uh approximately a hundred uh young children. And yet the FBI uh has not yet put out an intelligence bulletin about the threats to the homeland resulting from this war. Something that is uh as I think you know usually standard action in coordination with the National Counterterrorism Center and DHS, and and is absolutely essential to ensuring that state, local, tribal, and territorial private sector partners are are prepared for these uh these threats that we are seeing and actual actions that we're seeing. So my question for you, Director Patel, just to confirm, has the FBI in coordination with NCTC and DHS issued a joint homeland threat intelligence bulletin to state, local, tribal, territorial, and private sector partners on the threats from Iran and its proxies as a result, uh, of this, uh, war?

1:55:13 – 1:55:30

I know we have pushed out numerous PSAs and I believe through the ODNI, we have spoken collectively on the matter, but on the synagogue, um, attack. the FBI um directly coordinated with the synagogue three weeks before and provided training which the synagogue themselves stated um helped prevent uh the loss of of

1:55:30 – 1:55:33

No I and I agree with that certainly I'll I have a question

1:55:30 – 1:55:32

mass death rate and uh

1:55:33 – 1:55:41

later but uh that was a good thing absolutely but is there a coordinated bulletin going out to to all the entities that I mentioned? We have not found that bulletin, we have not seen that,

1:55:41 – 1:55:41

uh

1:55:41 – 1:55:46

that has been prior practice for the FBI I'm wondering why this is different this time, that's my question.

1:55:46 – 1:55:56

so what what I'm saying is we've sent out the FBI has sent out PSAs to all our state and local partners And I'll check with ODNI, but we should have sent out a coordinated, collected message out on that front.

1:55:55 – 1:56:00

Well, well, if you could forward that to me, cuz we have not seen that, so I'd appreciate that if that's the case.

1:55:59 – 1:56:00

Yes, sir.

1:56:00 – 1:56:03

If you could forward that to our office, I I would uh appreciate it.

1:56:02 – 1:56:06

Senator Peters, is a PSA the same thing that Senator Peters is asking about?

1:56:06 – 1:56:06

Yes.

1:56:06 – 1:56:08

Okay. Thanks.

1:56:08 – 1:56:20

We'll see. Um, I'm uh as ranking uh member of Homeland Security and Government Affairs, uh I uh uh Chairman Paul and I, working in a bipartisan way, Chairman Paul, have requested a committee briefing uh about

1:56:36 – 1:56:36

Absolutely.

1:56:37 – 1:56:37

Good.

1:56:38 – 1:58:19

Uh, Director Patel, for decades um uh the FBI uh in partnership with the uh Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency uh has played uh an absolutely critical role in helping uh both state and local election officials defend against uh threats uh to our election. Uh the FBI briefed election officials on both physical as well as cyber threats. It's helped political parties and campaigns uh secure their communication systems. Uh that it has investigated uh foreign influence operations and it's investigated threats uh against uh our election workers. Uh and the work was uh was bipartisan. Uh, it was technical, uh, and it was, uh, trusted over those years. However, today when we look, uh, at what the FBI is doing, it seems to be somewhat different. Uh, in January the FBI seized more than six hundred and fifty boxes of twenty twenty election materials from Fulton County, Georgia. Uh, in March the FBI subpoenaed records from a twenty twenty election audit in Maricopa County, Arizona. An audit, uh, that itself, uh, actually reaffirmed, uh, President Biden's uh uh win. And in April, the Justice Department demanded that Wayne County, Michigan, the largest county in my state, turn over ballots uh from the twenty-twenty-four election. So, Director Patel, my my question is wh- why should state and local election officials trust the FBI to support them in actually keeping our elections free and fair, when the FBI recently appears to be more focused on supporting baseless speculation and debunked conspiracy theories about both the twenty twenty and the twenty twenty four election.

1:58:19 – 1:59:00

Well, two things, Senator. Thank you. Um, as to the um execution of legal search processes, we went to federal and state magistrates and, like we do in any case, and received a ruling of probable cause to advance any investigations we're working on as to the overall security of the election that is of primary importance with us, which is why we at the FBI and me have installed ECC's, election county coordinators, in every single fifty-six field office that I have. We've also stood up a national security uh election security uh post at headquarters for the upcoming midterm elections. And so we are continuing to keep that a priority and collect information as it comes in from overseas and also around the country.

1:59:00 – 1:59:38

Well, that was my follow-up question there. I mean, but, you know, we're we're what what we've been seeing some of these actions here are ones that are related to these debunked theories, but our folk our officials wanna know what is gonna happen going forward. They're gonna wanna ensure that state and local elections are indeed uh gonna be free and fair and folks are being protected by the FBI. You mentioned a couple of in- initiatives. What what what is the main message that you wanna tell right now to election officials all across the United States, that the FBI is actually gonna be their partner to ensure, as we have seen in the past, free and fair elections that have occurred every single election in the United States in recent history, that it's also gonna happen again this uh this year.

1:59:39 – 2:00:00

That's why we've prioritized and stood up these ECCs. That's why we've prioritized and stood up these national coordination centers. And that's why we're hand in glove embedded with CISA and DHS uh to ensure the integrity of this upcoming election. We have prioritized that. We have flexed more resources than that, including the personnel I've shifted out to the field. So they're not just at headquarters, are working on election security and election integrity around the country.

2:00:01 – 2:00:11

Well, as you uh come before the uh committee on homeland security, which I appreciate your commitment to to have that briefing, Uh, we're gonna wanna do a deeper dive into that and I would hope you'd be prepared to do it at that time and you could commit to doing that.

2:00:12 – 2:00:12

Thank you, Senator.

2:00:12 – 2:00:14

Thank you. Thank you, Mister Chairman.

2:00:22 – 2:01:10

Thank you, uh, Mister Chairman. Thank you, directors, all of you, for your your good work. Um, I'm sure you have figured out by now that uh uh you're you you're not gonna be able to make some people in Washington DC happy. Um it just uh I regret that. Uh one one of my colleagues talks uh directly about you traveling too much. Um I- is it important that you go out there and travel and talk to our line agents and try to maintain morale?

2:01:10 – 2:01:24

That's that's one of the most important parts of the job, and if I can, uh when it comes to travel, I've actually traveled one third less for personal holidays than my prior p- two predecessors combined, and I've taken half as many days off as my prior predecessors combined.

2:01:23 – 2:01:32

Yeah. Have you ever seen uh United States senators travel? Including overseas?

2:01:31 – 2:01:33

Freak frequently.

2:01:33 – 2:01:34

You've seen that?

2:01:34 – 2:01:35

Yes, sir.

2:01:34 – 2:03:02

Yeah. I I wanna ask uh you and Director Cole. Um I see where the Department of Justice presumably with your your your your cooperation and good background work just indicted a governor in Mexico for uh for uh working with cartels to poison our people. Uh, which I I I everybody's entitled to a defense and they're innocent until proven guilty, but I I saw none of that in the uh intern in the in the prior administration trying to get serious. Tell me I I love the people of Mexico. They're just wonderful people. They're our neighbors. We we we buy a lot of their goods and they buy a lot of our goods. But help me understand why the the so many of the the political leaders in Mexico uh cooperate so fully well strike that t- tend to have very close ties with the drug cartels. Is it money? Is it is it power? Is it fear? And what do we do about it?

2:03:02 – 2:03:42

Uh, I'll address it generally, the cases, specifically the DEA's, Senator, but generally speaking, you know, we've been able to um retrieve ninety-eight um uh defendants from Mexico in the last year which is I think triple uh the year before so they're cooperating in ways that they haven't done before in the past but I do see your point and I agree that, largely it's fear, Senator. These cartels have so much power and you've seen them go down there and kidnap people, behead people, burn people, and I think it's um a combination of the fear and a little bit of the corruption um because of the influence they have with the amount of money they make from the narco-trafficking trade which is why we're prioritizing uh bringing it down.

2:03:43 – 2:03:44

Mister Director.

2:03:45 – 2:03:50

Senator, it's good to see you again and and I testified during my uh confirmation hearing uh

2:03:46 – 2:03:49

Good to see you, sir. Yes, sir.

2:03:50 – 2:03:54

regarding the arrest of Garcia Luna who was who was in charge of the federal police in in Mexico.

2:03:52 – 2:03:52

Yes, sir.

2:03:55 – 2:03:55

Mm-hmm.

2:03:55 – 2:04:10

And after, uh, a career special agent of mine, had the opportunity to work in Colombia, Afghanistan, and then my career in Mexico, there's no doubt that the narco-traffickers and high ranking government officials in Mexico have been in bed for years.

2:04:11 – 2:04:11

Mm-hmm.

2:04:11 – 2:04:15

But for all of a sudden, we're paying attention to it.

2:04:15 – 2:04:15

Mm-hmm.

2:04:15 – 2:04:43

We have a president who fully supports America first, Americans first. They are just as much responsible for the death and destruction of record amounts of Americans by cooperating, by conspiring, by helping, producing this poison to come across the border and come into our country. And, Senator, I can assure you, this is just the start of a w- about what's to come in Mexico.

2:04:43 – 2:05:43

Good. I I think it's important, and and I don't want to paint with too broad of a brush, but I think it's important that we we we keep the pressure on. And I appreciate the good work that both of your agencies have done and that the president has done. Um. Because when an, when a, wha- the current president didn't do this, but when a prior president of Mexico runs on a platform of uh hugs, not bullets, with respect to the cartels, that that sort of speaks volumes about what's They're willing to be to tolerate. Ca- can I ask one question, mister Prat, mister Chairman of of Director Patel? Tell me why we shouldn't require warrants under section seven O two when our intelligence people access the records of American citizens.

2:05:44 – 2:05:48

I think you're referring to the query process of US persons under seven O two, Senator.

2:05:48 – 2:05:49

Yes, sir.

2:05:49 – 2:06:08

Because under section seven O two as it stands, the collection from seven O two is already lawfully collected under federal statute of overseas individuals, targeted by the intelligence communities. And just to clarify, seven O two is run separately by the FBI, the NSA, the CIA. They have their own separate seven O two programs.

2:06:06 – 2:06:07

Right.

2:06:08 – 2:06:46

So for us, in order to um have the ability to defend the homeland appropriately, all we are doing when we run a query is we're asking that this selector popped and we have no other information. So it would be factually and legally impossible to obtain probable cause because we just walk into a courtroom and say we got this selector, it's connected with so-and-so lawfully collected information overseas, we can't tell you judge anything else about it, they would say you don't have probable cause. And that's why the query system exists, to go in and see if they're actually connected to any terrorist activities or narcotics trafficking activities or otherwise.

2:06:47 – 2:06:50

Thank you for your indulgence, Mr. Chairman.

2:06:50 – 2:06:52

Senator Kennedy, thank you. Senator Murkowski.

2:06:52 – 2:09:31

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Uh, gentlemen, thank you for for being here today, your testimony. Uh, last week we recognized May fifth as a day to, um, to remember those who have gone, murdered, missing, indigenous persons. Um, uh, unfortunately in Alaska this is this is something that uh we we use some pretty strong words like epidemic and crisis. Um the uh the Urban Indian um Health Institute uh has reports on the numbers that are out there right now and and in Alaska we've got two hundred twenty nine um murdered, Uh missing, indigenous persons, and and what else? eighty murdered, a hundred and forty nine that are on the missing list. Um and the statistic that is always so troubling is that when when women go missing, when women come up m- d- are determined um to have been murdered, seventy-five percent of them are Alaska Native women. I mean the statistics are just shocking and deeply, deeply troubling. Alaska is the fourth highest state um when it comes to murdered, missing um Indigenous women in the country. Obviously we have a large Indigenous population, but it is, it is something where you, when you listen to the statements from so many Native women uh that they feel unsafe in in their home uh communities. They feel unsafe in their villages and they feel uh probably most unsafe in the biggest village which is which is Anchorage. We are we're working on uh trying to to make some headway uh here um in this space, but we really need to understand where the gaps are. And we talk a lot about the gated data gaps. And so I'm raising this with you, uh, Director Patel, and asking for for your support and that of your team. You have great folks in Alaska, but I would suggest that, um, given given we have a small population, big, big, uh, landmass, um, and and a problem and statistics that just don't don't match up to our demographics, that we need some help. Um uh we've got good cooperation between all of our federal agencies, working with our tribal partners and and with the state. Um but I would just ask your commitment today that if you if you haven't already trained uh a focus in this area that you will commit to to helping us in Alaska.

2:09:32 – 2:09:49

Absolutely, Senator, that's why we launched Operation Steadfast Promise, which is the first ever of its kind year-long campaign for crimes on tribal lands um across the country, to include Alaska. And I'm proud to tell you today that one of the biggest problems I was informed about over the last fourteen months was communication gaps.

2:09:49 – 2:09:49

Yep.

2:09:49 – 2:10:11

Um and the FBI for the first time ever um completed its pilot program um in uh on the Navajo reservation down in Phoenix area um with Starlink capabilities. And we are now going to be delivering to every SAC um Starlink capabilities specifically and solely for communications on tribal lands to conduct and investigate tribal investigations.

2:10:11 – 2:10:22

Well, and I just might add that the the communications is one thing amongst the uh uh uh the law enforcement, but it's also communicating back to the families,

2:10:22 – 2:10:22

Yes.

2:10:22 – 2:11:42

the families that are so anxious, and this is this is where I think we have some some some real failures uh, if you will. And you know, I'm I'm stressing it with re with regards to Alaska, but it is Alaska natives but also American Indians as you've pointed out there, so I I appreciate your commitment on that level. Um uh I wanted to ask about your comment, uh Administrator Cole, when you were talking about uh the fentanyl that we're seeing um coming from China into Canada and then coming back in. Um Vancouver's not too far away from where we're sitting over there um in the in the Northwest. Uh I I I wanna just confirm that as we are focusing on on intercepts at the at the southern border we're not taking our eye off the ball when it comes to to the northern border and this is this is to you uh Administrator Cole when it comes to the drugs but also to you Director uh Patel in terms of the uh the the the terrorist threats that we may see um uh who may be looking to the northern border as perhaps being more porous, um certainly longer in my state. So if if the two of you can speak to that.

2:11:41 – 2:11:42

I'll go first.

2:11:42 – 2:12:36

Okay. From Senator, from a DEA perspective, uh we're keeping our eye on Canada, we're gonna open two more offices in Canada, uh proposed for twenty-seven, but we will continue to do outreach, we'll continue to work with the tribal and the Native Americans. when it comes to educating them, providing them the resources, but number two, the tremendous working relationship we have with the US Postal Service with intercepting packages that are leaving the States going into Alaska. Uh, for example, in April we we had a targeted enforcement where we got ten kilos of fentanyl and multiple packages that were going into Alaska and five kilos of methamphetamine that were leaving domestically going into uh Alaska as well. So this is the importance of the holistic approach, opening more offices, but keeping IRI on this cause and effect that we see from the Mexican cartels now entering into Canada.

2:12:37 – 2:12:38

Thank you, Director.

2:12:38 – 2:13:21

Yes, Senator. What we've done, specifically on the northern border front, is launch and and put up, stand up the first of its kind of homeland security task force in Alaska, uh, which allows us to take a lot of the funding and resources that we have access to and put more agents and intel folks not just from the FBI but from the other agencies across the board. And what we've also focused on, at least at the FBI, is working with our Canadian partners on the production capabilities that the drug traffickers have moved up to the north north of our border, and specifically fly into Alaska and also into mainland America on tribal lands. And we've had some success there uh working with our Canadian partners because the drug traffickers got smart uh with the securitization of the southern border and

2:13:25 – 2:14:25

Thank you for not taking the ball off that. I have a question for uh Director uh Seralta regarding the federal detention facility in Alaska we do not have a federal detention facility in our state so all federal im inmates either has to be have to be housed at a state uh prison or m more often they're just sent out of state and it's It is at at considerable cost to our US Marshals to transport these federal inmates. Um we have asked for a uh feasibility study to to determine whether it's now time to do that. The last time that this was reviewed was over twenty years ago at Senator Stevens' request. I've got report language in a past appropriations bill about a new study, but quite honestly the the response that we received from the department has pretty been pretty um lacking in detail and so um I would would ask you,

2:14:22 – 2:14:22

Mm-hmm.

2:14:25 – 2:14:31

Director, if you'd be willing to take a look at to this and have a conversation with us about uh the need in the state of Alaska.

2:14:32 – 2:15:09

Senator, uh thank you for your question. The the answer to your question is uh yes, I'm I'm willing to look at anything that will facilitate uh the processing of prisoners in a safe manner. However, I d I have to note that we we use about eighty percent of our jails are state and locals. That's throughout the nation, so it's not uncommon. However, uh there there is a pr per perhaps a a Bureau of Prison um uh uh prison project that may may work well in Alaska, but I I would have to see what

2:15:10 – 2:15:12

I I'd I'd look forward to a conversation with you about it.

2:15:10 – 2:15:10

the phenomena look like.

2:15:12 – 2:15:30

We um unfortunately don't have anything that comes cheap when it comes to taking care of uh our federal inmates whether it's on the state side or shipping them out and so it is a cost matter um but it also uh is a great burden on our US Marshals and I appreciate the good work that you do.

2:15:28 – 2:15:29

It sure is. Thank you.

2:15:30 – 2:15:31

Thank you Mr. Chairman.

2:15:31 – 2:15:31

Thank you.

2:15:31 – 2:15:41

Thank you, Senator Murkowski. Um Senator Van Hollen is and I are gonna h just have a couple of wrap-up questions and then we'll conclude the hearing and I'll turn to Senator Van Hollen.

2:15:42 – 2:16:16

Uh, th- thank you, Mr. Chairman. So, Director Patel, I've been listening carefully to your responses to some of my colleagues and uh I wanna start with a question that Senator Coons asked you that relates to this article where the headline is Kash Patel's latest firing firings ousted agents with expertise in Iran. Uh, the article says that these individuals were uh fired for their role in the classified documents investigations of Donald Trump. First of all, is that true?

2:16:17 – 2:16:23

Uh the article, just like all the other articles you cited, is false. And there's ongoing litigation, so I can't address it.

2:16:23 – 2:16:34

Okay. You did you you did answer, Senator Coons, and I understood your answer to me that the people that were fired, that none of them were part of the uh group that had Iran expertise. Is that is that your answer?

2:16:34 – 2:16:36

No, he asked if they were Iran experts. I said they were not.

2:16:39 – 2:16:43

Do you, did the, were the group fired? Did it include people who were Iran experts?

2:16:44 – 2:16:44

No.

2:16:44 – 2:16:50

Did it include people who were involved in counter espionage activities with respect to Iran?

2:16:51 – 2:16:52

I don't have the list in front of me.

2:16:53 – 2:17:02

S- so you don't know whether or not you fired people with counter-executive ex- counter espionage experience with respect to Iran you don't know the answer to that question.

2:17:03 – 2:17:05

I terminated anyone and everyone that weaponized law enforcement.

2:17:06 – 2:17:16

I I see. So it was related obviously to the classified documents case. So uh Director well Director Patel uh Director Patel,

2:17:12 – 2:17:13

That's not what I said.

2:17:16 – 2:17:28

I understood you to say to in response to Senator Murray that um you've not redirected FBI resources toward the immigration enforcement effort. Is that true?

2:17:27 – 2:17:28

That's not what I said.

2:17:28 – 2:17:38

Okay. D have you redirected resources away from your core FBI responsibilities toward the mass deportation effort.

2:17:39 – 2:17:56

Uh, no one at the FBI has been permanently reassigned on the immigration front, and when we pulled the numbers, the FBI's overall operational field expenditures surged periodically for immigration enforcement activities including the rest of two thousand people with with direct ties to foreign terrorist organizations, was two point four percent.

2:17:57 – 2:18:04

So, okay. So you're the the key word there I guess was permanently. You have not permanently reassigned. Is that what you you reassigned temporarily?

2:18:04 – 2:18:05

Surges, yes sir.

2:18:05 – 2:18:17

Okay. Um, have you had a chance to listen to or read about Brian Driscoll's statements about what you said to him and the reasons for his firing?

2:18:17 – 2:18:18

No, I have not, sir.

2:18:18 – 2:18:33

Okay. Uh, so let me, let me just say this, Mister Director. Um, in your response to me earlier, where you had a little bit of a blow-up, you made a couple provably false statements.

2:18:33 – 2:18:34

So did you.

2:18:34 – 2:19:29

No, I mis- Mister Director, I was reading about and asking you and asking you to respond to allegations that are made. In fact, I was giving you an opportunity to do that. And you took that opportunity. But in the process, you made these provably false statements that I know are sort of like urban legend in right-wing media about margaritas in El Salvador, which is provably false. And so coming from the mouth of an FBI director to make provably false statements in a hearing like this is extremely troubling. And it it leads me to ask whether or not the other things you've been saying are false statements. And so my uh because uh that was that's a provably false statement. You made a couple others that are provably false. And this is from the mouth of the FBI director.

2:19:29 – 2:19:31

The only one that made false statements is you.

2:19:29 – 2:19:39

So my final question My my final question to you, Mister Director, is do you know that it is a crime to lie to Congress? You know that. That's my last question.

2:19:40 – 2:19:41

I have not lied to Congress.

2:19:42 – 2:19:42

I didn't ask you that.

2:19:42 – 2:19:43

The one that lied to Congress is you.

2:19:44 – 2:19:44

Do you

2:19:44 – 2:19:45

And

2:19:45 – 2:19:47

I'm not testifying here, sir, and I don't lie.

2:19:47 – 2:19:50

Maybe the next time you run up a seven thousand dollar bar tab we can talk about it.

2:19:48 – 2:19:55

Mm-hmm. Well, see, there you go li- li- lying again. You suggested there were there were there were you suggested it was public.

2:19:52 – 2:19:55

It's in the FEC report. I'll post it right now. Hang on.

2:19:56 – 2:19:57

It wasn't public money, as you know.

2:19:57 – 2:19:57

Thank you.

2:19:57 – 2:19:59

That was for a fifty member staff.

2:20:00 – 2:20:02

So it was a seven thousand dollar bar tab.

2:20:02 – 2:20:03

Mister Mister Patel,

2:20:02 – 2:20:03

Oh, okay.

2:20:03 – 2:20:24

I'm glad, let me just say in closing, Mister Chairman, two things. I'm glad that you have agreed to take the the test regarding, you know, whether you have alcohol problems, I'm glad you agreed with me to do that. Um, you still haven't answered my final question. Do you know, Mister Director, that it is a crime to lie to Congress? Do you know that?

2:20:27 – 2:20:29

I do not lie to Congress.

2:20:28 – 2:20:29

I didn't ask you that.

2:20:29 – 2:20:32

And you're insinuating that I am because you want,

2:20:31 – 2:20:33

I asked you whether you know or not you'll

2:20:32 – 2:20:41

you want to correct your time in this session where you got steamrolled by the facts, so you can have a Twitter narrative so you can go raise more

2:20:40 – 2:20:41

Mister Director

2:20:41 – 2:20:44

money and spend more money on seven thousand dollar bartends.

2:20:43 – 2:20:45

Just just let the record show,

2:20:45 – 2:20:46

And I'm not gonna give it to you.

2:20:45 – 2:20:54

Mister Chairman, the Director of the FBI apparently does not want to answer the question about whether or not it's a crime to lie to Congress and I find that

2:20:55 – 2:20:58

I find it troubling that you lie to the American people every day.

2:20:55 – 2:21:01

somebody who's entrusted with law enforcement. You you are a disgrace, Mister Director,

2:21:01 – 2:21:02

Not nearly as big as you.

2:21:01 – 2:21:21

and the fact that you can't answer that question, I will I will that that that concludes my question, uh, Mister Chairman, but, uh, I'm obviously very troubled. Uh, question for the, uh, Director of ATF. Uh, Director Sakata, um, I wanna talk just a minute about Niven.

2:21:22 – 2:22:09

Um, I don't need to explain to you what NIBIN is, uh, but it is a very useful tool, uh, in involving violent crimes and illegal firearms. Um, while I su- strongly support the second amendment and the right of law-abiding s- citizens to own guns and carry guns, I also believe that the responsibility we have with law enforcement is to make certain you have the tools to target violent criminals who use firearms to terrorize communities. uh, your budget requests a program increase of seven point eight million to support NIBIN. I wanted to give you the opportunity for me to hear the reason for that increase and how that tool will be helpful to law enforcement officials in my home state of Kansas.

2:22:10 – 2:24:42

Good afternoon, Senator, thank you again for your uh question and uh your support of ATF, in particular with the crime gun intelligence uh services that we provide to our state and local partners. Uh, Nibin is one of the uh three legs to the stool of uh crime net intelligence, and probably one of the uh most important. Uh, we uh our uh correlation review specialists are housed in two facilities, one in Huntsville, Alabama and one in Wichita. Uh, they uh review approximately three thousand uh images per day, uh that are received from our state and local partners. Those images are uh fired cartridge casings that are uh recovered in crime scenes from across the country. Uh and uh those uh experts c- uh which we call correlation review specialists have a capacity as to how many images they can review over their eight hour uh shift, and be able to successfully match uh to a uh crime scene out in the field. Uh we currently uh run two shifts about sixteen hours a day uh in both of those facilities and we service approximately uh twelve thousand police departments around the country. Uh we have a uh pending uh backlog of about thirty police departments that are waiting to be added to uh Niben and many more that are seeking support in uh acquiring a brass tracks machine, which is the actual machine that takes the images of either the fired cartridge casing or a uh test fired casing and a firearm, we would recover from a crime scene. Uh the uh capacity um uh is pretty much capped right now. And uh we have a number of issues we're dealing with. In twenty twenty seven about two hundred and twenty six Brass Trax machines go end of life uh around the country for our state and local partners those partners do not have a budget to replace those machines uh which would mean that uh the critical services we provide uh uh and the way those departments are interdependent on one another to share that intelligence because often shooters come to one city, commit a shooting, firearm but live in another city and use those firearms in those other cities, we actually develop quite often uh the leads from the adjoining city. So uh it's critical for us to have the money to keep on modernizing the system and to be able to take on the additional capacity uh that our state and local partners uh require ATF to be able to handle uh as we continue to tackle this problem of violent crime attrib- attributed to violent felons around the country.

2:24:43 – 2:24:46

And that's the purpose of the seven point something million dollars, uh,

2:24:46 – 2:24:47

A portion of it, yes, sir.

2:24:46 – 2:25:02

in the procurement. Okay. And it used to be, let me, let me understand about this, do you provide a, the necessary, uh, device for local law enforcement to make that, uh, finding that they then forward to the knife-in-center?

2:25:03 – 2:25:05

So that the device is called the brass tracks machine, and

2:25:05 – 2:25:07

The bra- brass tracks machine?

2:25:07 – 2:25:07

Yes, sir, and that

2:25:07 – 2:25:09

And do you provide that to local law enforcement?

2:25:09 – 2:25:23

We, we, uh, h in the past, Purchased it for uh the local uh police department at a cost of approximately three hundred thousand dollars uh per machine. Two hundred thousand dollars for the machine plus uh about a hundred thousand dollars for five years of service.

2:25:23 – 2:25:33

And the the widespread use of that machine is hugely important to the success of the overall mission of of identifying and correlating.

2:25:33 – 2:25:34

That that's correct.

2:25:34 – 2:25:39

If if if the if you don't have the ability to input the information, then the system is less valuable.

2:25:39 – 2:25:50

That's correct. It's it's uh, if I was to compare it to APHIS on the fingerprint side, uh the more fingerprints you have in the in the system, the more likely you will come back with a successful match.

2:25:48 – 2:26:28

Okay. Uh, Director Patel, let me ask you about what should I be worrying about. Kansas City is one of the host cities uh for the World Cup, a significant presence uh and uh we've had uh with the with your help, we've had a a um hearing in this subcommittee along with the Senator Britt's subcommittee on homeland security, uh, looking at the security issues for uh places across the country associated with the World Cup. Uh, we weren't I wa- I wasn't able to ask you the que- this question at the time, but just what what are your worries and what should I be worrying about in trying to help Kansas City and other communities have the necessary safety and security for the people who attend?

2:26:28 – 2:28:13

For Kansas City, for any host cities, for any base camp cities, it's the same message. Our best partners are our state and local partners, and uh providing the training that we do for our counter UAF program to our host cities and our base camp cities is critical to that, but also deploying during the World Cup events to all the major cities across the country including our SABTs our bomb technicians and our response techs we have prepared and already put out a program to surge to those cities ahead of time and during um the World Cup staging events we've also completed or will complete three hundred thousand background checks for individuals coming associated with the FIFA World Cup so we run them against our background holdings um the other federal law enforcement partners' agencies, and then we push that back out to the field. Um but the best thing that the communities can do, because the communities are the best partners for the FBI, is the communities and the state and locals online can help us monitor, can help send tips to the FBI, can do it at NTUK, can do it at CIGIS because of the AI capabilities that we've implemented there, and we're allowed to triage that data near live time and send it back to the community and the state and local and say hey, this individual is a threat or this individual is talking to someone that's a threat. It's the biggest ask I have of the United States during the World Cup or any major sporting event. We had we had the Olympics in Milan, we had F two F one races, the Super Bowl and the Club World Cup last summer, and we had zero, zero major security incidents. Um, we've learned from each and every one of those with our international partners and our state and federal partners, and we're well prepared for the upcoming World Cup across America, which is gonna have three million people come visit. both Canada uh and America and also Mexico. But the state and locals focusing on on-line threats for me, um and providing that information would be critical.

2:28:13 – 2:28:21

And that's a capability of sharing that information that they wouldn't have had in the absence of the attention that's being provided now due to the World Cup.

2:28:22 – 2:28:52

Absolutely, and also data on the sidelines, as I said earlier, is might as well not be collected. So that's why we took the AI tools for the first time ever and applied them against triaging that data that comes in on the N talk, our tip lines, and then our criminal justice information systems were able to go through all of that, including foreign language, and triage that and foreign social media posts and triage that. And we did so in North Carolina, just to give you one example, and prevented a school shooting. If we had just left it the human capital, we would have missed it.

2:28:53 – 2:29:27

Got it. Uh, Administrator Cole, uh, I've had the opportunity to see DEA air wings, uh, the aviation department in a couple of locations. across the country. Uh, I wanted to give you a moment to speak toward the current, uh, state of the DEA's aviation fleet. Modernization or recapitalization needs the agencies facing. We've tried to pay some attention toward, uh, recapitalizing the DEA and other law enforcement agencies' air fleet, uh, but I can't imagine that we're, uh, anyplace close to where it oughta be.

2:29:28 – 2:30:04

No, sir, we aren't. Thank you for your continued support of DEA aviation. Uh, we recently sold uh one of our Challenger jets. Uh, we're gonna use that, those proceeds, backed by another King Air. The King Air is the workhorse of our agency, uh, not only domestically but internationally. It's been our workhorse in Colombia and soon to be going back to Mexico. So, it's much needed. We will continue to streamline our efforts, continue to enforce the importance of aviation. especially with surveillance, but it's a force protector for our men and women that are on the ground every single day as well. So thank you for your support.

2:30:05 – 2:30:09

And and how does how does the budget request address that issue of recapitalization?

2:30:09 – 2:30:21

The the budget address will help with the purchase of the of the new aircraft, but it'll also allow us to ensure that our aviation fleet is always modern, safe and very efficient.

2:30:21 – 2:30:42

Let me turn again to you though, uh, Administrator Cole. Southwest Kansas sits in a major trafficking corridor, faced in my view, unique challenges tied to narcotics trafficking, uh, specifically the movement of fentanyl and metaf metaf metaf. Uh, this is the second time I haven't been able to say words.

2:30:42 – 2:30:43

Methamphetamine.

2:30:43 – 2:30:46

Methamphetamines, thank you, through uh rural communities

2:30:44 – 2:30:44

Yes, sir.

2:30:47 – 2:31:25

that do not have the the same local law enforcement resources as large cities do. Uh, the DEA has been willing to establish a position in Garden City, um, and I appreciate that. Would you speak to what additional steps the DEA is taking to incentivize agents, uh, to locate in a place like Garden City, uh, which to me is a very fine place, but is rural and, um, it's, uh, considered a small town by many, uh, but one of the largest that I represent. And uh tell me about what you need in regard to incentives for relocation or otherwise.

2:31:25 – 2:31:59

Well, thank you for that, and as a career special agent, my first assignment was McAllister, Oklahoma. Three agents for thirty counties, so I know the importance of making sure that DEA is present in those rural counties. I'm committed to staffing the Garden City office. I'm gonna personally t- pay attention to it and we're gonna get you somebody there, because it's the number one priority, our connectivity to our state, local and tribal partners. to number one address the fentanyl epidemic that's ravaging through our states, but also to increase the capacity when it comes to sharing intelligence to allows the state and locals to do their jobs.

2:32:00 – 2:32:07

Uh, do you have incentive capability to incent someone to locate in a particular location, large or small?

2:32:06 – 2:32:08

Yes, sir. Yes, sir, we do.

2:32:10 – 2:32:33

Uh, Director Patel, uh, I wanna ask you to speak about the current threat environment uh in regard to um religious and specifically Jewish communities uh in the United States, um the status of the October seventh task force, and what steps the FBI is taking to coordinate with local law enforcement uh in regard to religious institutions.

2:32:33 – 2:34:14

So we have um focused heavily on um those religious motivated acts of violence. And the October seventh task force, actually I'm glad you bring it up, was the first model on the counterterrorism front. um that we utilized AI on our collection. And it it gave us numerous leads, including um the ability to stop and thwart attacks. We stopped four attacks during the holidays in just December alone. Unfortunately, the reality um that the Jewish population faces is that sixty percent of the FBI's cases that are based in hatred or ideology are targeted against the Jewish community and so what we're doing to counterman that front is a couple of things one get out as much information as we can to the American public to show that these investigations lead directly to ties based in ideal uh ideology, excuse me, um in anti-semitic values. And we're trying to educate the American public in the world that this is a very real threat here. Targeted behind the Jewish community are of course um uh a good amount of Catholic and Christian um um hate-based uh ideology and crimes. And so what we've done across the enterprise is We've shifted the resources from DC, put them out into the field to specifically go out into the field and dismantle not just the networks on the ground but also reverse engineer who these people know, who paid them, how they got there, where online they are communicating because that's the biggest um sort of uh incubator for this hatred and ideology. And what we're trying to do with our S SACs in the field is have engagements like we did with the synagogue in Michigan and elsewhere, ahead of time and train the local communities based on the

2:34:12 – 2:34:12

Mm.

2:34:14 – 2:34:20

fact-based investigations we're conducting across the country, so they can prevent, um, like they did in Michigan, a mass attack.

2:34:20 – 2:34:46

The mig- I, the, uh, your, Senator Peter's, uh, question and your response in particular, uh, caught my attention, which suggested that there was knowledge and information in advance, and so there was capabilities of prevention or reduction in the outcome, uh, the, the nature of the outcome. And is that unusual? We are you able to see, you're you're able to see through your work that something is about to happen? As compared to respond to something that did happen?

2:34:44 – 2:35:20

We That's correct, sir. And it's also just proactive because of the investigations we've undertaken in hate-based ideology we're able to go out ahead of time to synagogues like in Michigan. So we didn't have a direct threat reporting related to that individual conducting that threat but we knew other individuals and synagogues in the area would be targeted, so we went there and instructed them how to secure the facility should they undergo an attack. And the individuals that worked there immediately called the FBI and they said, our training pursuant to you, the Bureau, led to us being able to save lives on that day. And we're doing that around the country.

2:35:20 – 2:35:23

It's a really rewarding circumstance uh to the FBI.

2:35:22 – 2:35:22

It was

2:35:23 – 2:35:25

I guess uh that's uh that's pleasing to me.

2:35:24 – 2:35:24

Yeah.

2:35:25 – 2:35:54

Uh Director Director Seralta, um US Marshals have had success in regional fugitive task force models across the country. Um, there's been conversations in the past about expanding or strengthening that regional task force capabilities in the Midwest, the Midwest part of the country. Uh, is there a possibility of bringing an expanded regional fugitive task force presence to the Midwest? Is that still part of conversations at the uh, US Marshal service?

2:35:55 – 2:36:53

Thank you for your question, Senator. So um, the President's budget request. uh expands the regional fugitive task forces uh and the district task forces with operational administrative personnel dedicated to the fugitive apprehension missions. Uh also includes expansion of our tactical canine uh t- to provide each RFTF with a full-time canine support, it's really important. Uh for that we we were provided with forty-three million dollars. However, um, the program increases is is for a hundred and seven positions. Our goal is to cover the country from coast to coast with RFT Fs. Uh, however, that that does require permanent appropriated funding uh for that purpose. So, short answer is yes, sir.

2:36:54 – 2:37:01

There is thought. That was my second question. Do you have the resources to implement that thought? And your answer is not necessarily.

2:37:01 – 2:37:02

Not necessarily, sir.

2:37:02 – 2:37:23

Understand. Um. Director Patel, let me I I was an advocate, so of your idea a year ago of putting agents in the field, and we heard today a number of instances in which that's made a difference. And I assume that is a is a success and is the intention for the for the FBI to continue in that fa fashion.

2:37:23 – 2:37:25

Yes, sir. We're gonna continue that way.

2:37:25 – 2:37:36

Um. The hiring capabilities, do you all have positions that are empty, need are are vacant and need to be filled? Is that true across the board?

2:37:36 – 2:37:37

Yes, sir.

2:37:37 – 2:37:38

Yes.

2:37:37 – 2:37:38

Yes, sir.

2:37:39 – 2:37:50

And the reason those positions are open is what, is there a common denominator among the agencies? Someone could say what their problem is and I'll see if everybody agrees.

2:37:50 – 2:38:34

Uh I could speak for ATF. Uh I think, sir, that for our purposes we were under hiring freeze in twenty twenty five, so we weren't able to start up our hiring machine uh we received authorization late in twenty five to uh begin to backfill some of those vacancies and uh in addition to that authorization we've received significant support uh through some supplemental funding through uh uh the hstf and ob three uh to uh try to backfill agent uh positions uh we are in that process right now uh but as i stated uh taking a machine from full stop and bringing it into operation takes some time so we're in that uh we're in that stage right now where the machine is moving forward and we anticipate being able to backfill those positions with the support that we've received.

2:38:34 – 2:38:36

Anybody need to add anything to Director Cicada's

2:38:37 – 2:38:38

Senator,

2:38:37 – 2:38:38

reports?

2:38:38 – 2:39:01

I'd like to add to that that uh uh for the martial service the RHR uh department actually has a very archaic uh software program for for human resource management. Uh so we're upgrading that system uh as we speak. uh thanks to the help from uh DOJ and and OMB um a- and I believe we're gonna be able to get over that hurdle.

2:39:01 – 2:39:42

Okay. And Director Patel talked about the training of local law enforcement, the FBI academy and its value and the demand for those services. Um I know the FBI uh ha- has has their own training facility uh we ought to figure out how we can train more local law enforcement uh officials. I I've seen and had conversations with local law enforcement officers as well as their s- their superiors who are so pleased by the training they've received and it uh it's a professional change in their lives, uh having had that experience is once you find someone to fill a position is training an issue to get them on board and at work?

2:39:43 – 2:39:53

Uh, I think there's two pieces to that, the National Academy to train our state and locals, for whatever reason they had capped it before I got there, and everybody across the country wanted more slots so I'm putting two hundred

2:39:57 – 2:39:59

That problem you're apparently solving, or

2:39:59 – 2:40:38

Yeah, that one we've we we've solved. On the on the BFTC side of the house for the special agents, um what our lag was was there was essentially a hundred days f- once you submit a piece of paper your application to say I would like to come do this, and for them to just receive an interview. So we eliminated the lag time. So we took off almost four months of lag time. And because of that our BFT classes have started going up. And so our recruiting is also, um, been heavily invested in to recruit around the country. And so we're filling the billets. And as soon as you graduate BFTC, you go immediately to, uh, your field office assignment. There's no, like, literally the day after graduation, you report for duty.

2:40:38 – 2:40:47

Let me ask the other agencies if, so if you're successful in recruiting, do you have the capacity then to train and put that new agent in, in the field at work?

2:40:48 – 2:41:01

Senator, from DEA perspective? Since we're back to global enforcement, we have no shortage of applicants and we have space. We have our own academy, uh, next to the FBI academy at Quantico. So we've been running significant classes through the academy.

2:41:01 – 2:41:01

Okay.

2:41:01 – 2:41:02

Yes, sir.

2:41:02 – 2:41:04

US Marshals and uh ATF?

2:41:04 – 2:41:18

From the Marshal service uh perspective, we use FLETSI, um, they have accommodated uh an increase in classes uh to date, um, and we have a great work-home relationship uh, but would explore other methods if if they're available.

2:41:20 – 2:41:31

And the same for us, sir, we also uh have our agents go through FLETC and uh FLETC has accommodated us by providing double the number of classes uh that we are normally slated for, for twenty-seven.

2:41:32 – 2:42:22

Thank you. Uh only other comment I'd make and then we'll close the hearing is um the Homeland Security Task Forces that we were accustomed to OCDEF uh prior to that, now we have HSTF's. Um, we're working, and if if there's ways that we can be of help, maybe that's the way for me to say it, homeland security needs to make uh reimbursements to the various agencies, and so we're working to make sure that that happens in a timely fashion. I would guess DHS, because of a number of reasons, is administrative challenges in the last few months, uh maybe is slow in accomplishing that, but we recognize the money that needs to be transferred to get to the agencies to participate in the uh, joint efforts. That that makes sense. Am I missing something? Okay.

2:42:22 – 2:42:22

Yes, sir.

2:42:23 – 2:42:40

Uh I'm not I'm not gonna ask this que- that question this time. Uh, if there's no further questions, senators may submit additional records for the subcommittee's official hearing record. We request the director and administrator's response within thirty days. Sec subcommittee stands in recess. Subcommittee call the chair.

Morning digest

Start every morning briefed on yesterday’s hearings

A free weekday email covering yesterday’s hearings and transcripts newly unlocked in the archive.

Free weekday email. Unsubscribe anytime.