Senate seal

Senate · Hearing transcript

Proposed FY 2027 Department of Health and Human Services Budget Hearing

Tuesday, April 21, 2026

Summary

  • Reserve chiefs testified that Guard and Reserve provide over 30% of Operation Epic Fury forces while seeking $1 billion equipment account in FY27 base budget.
  • Steven S. Nordhaus (Chief of the National Guard Bureau, National Guard Bureau) said the Guard comprises 20% of the joint force while operating on less than 4% of defense spending.
  • Tammy Baldwin pressed Robert D. Harter (Chief of Army Reserve and Commanding General, U.S. Army Reserve Command, United States Army) on unequal post-deployment medical care for Army reservists.
  • Sen. Coons (D-DE) and Mitch McConnell jointly backed $400 million Ukraine aid and criticized slow adaptation to drone warfare lessons from Ukraine.
  • Leaders will compile Operation Epic Fury costs for an expected supplemental to avoid absorbing combat expenses into baseline readiness accounts.

Morning digest

Get hearings like this in your inbox

Free weekday email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Hearing Details

Witnesses

Members Who Spoke

View on Congress.gov

Transcript

Sen. Capito (WV)12:47 – 13:20

we're still waiting for one alright good morning yeah there's no one else so we're good i was just with the archbishop

Sen. McConnell (KY)13:26 – 19:33

ok this subcommittee will come to order with the fiscal year twenty seven appropriations process now underway we're here today to receive testimony on the posture of the national guard bureau and reserve components thanks all of you witnesses for being here general nordhaus chief of the national guard bureau lieutenant general robert harter chief of the army reserve rear admiral richard lopkin acting chief of the navy reserve lieutenant general lonnie anderson commander of the marine force reserve and lieutenant general john p hailey chief of the air force reserves this will be general hailey's final posture hearing with the subcommittee so i wanna thank him his wife kathy for decades of dedicated service to our nation and the lasting impact he'll leave on the force so gentlemen welcome we look forward to candid discussion about the president's budget request for fiscal year twenty twenty seven the president's intention to significantly increase overall investment in national defense is certainly good news but the details beneath the top line will determine whether the us military can train equip deploy and sustain a force capable actually capable of deterring serious threats the guard and reserve are critical to the homeland defense security cooperation with allies and partners in readiness to meet aggression with an overwhelming response obviously ongoing operations in the middle east offer a tragic reminder a majority of the service members killed in action since march first have been members of the guard or reserve and i know the subcommittee's deepest sympathies are with their comrades and their families of course current conflicts also offer urgent lessons about the future warfare this is not just a responsibility of the active component secretary visco observed last week that ukraine has quote fundamentally altered how humans engage in conflict and that quote we are learning a lot from them end quote i think the secretary's observation is spot on but the value of these lessons will hinge on our own ability to actually apply them our adversaries for their part are applying them iran has used lessons from russia's war and applied them against us in the middle east us on the other hand been slow uh to adapt why could that be well in part because two administrations in a row have limited the number of military advisers who could visit ukraine it's hard to learn if you do not observe it's also hard to deepen cooperation with ukraine while cutting assistance at the same time that's why republican majorities in congress voted both to authorize and to, more importantly, appropriate four hundred million dollars in assistance for fiscal year twenty-six this year. And we expect that the department will obligate and expend those funds in accordance with congressional intent. The current strategic landscape suggests that the demand for highly trained well-equipped citizens in uniform like the ones currently operating in centcom isn't likely to decrease anytime soon but the garden reserve's ability to perform these official missions to answer the call depends on your access to modern capabilities and stable funding so i'll be curious to hear what lessons you're deriving from current complex and what you're doing to implement them across your commands. I was encouraged that the president's budget request includes increased funding for military personnel operation and maintenance and most notably the national guard and reserve equipment account. Congress has historically carried the water for this account which helps to modernize the equipment available to card to both the guard and the reserve but it is included in the base budget request. actually for the first time these are important requests of commitment but you know better than anyone that it'll be hard to meet multi-year modernization targets without stable funding and on that front i've repeatedly repeatedly warned the department and even more importantly omb that one time shots of reconciliation dollars simply cannot stand in for continuing annual appropriations. So, we owe it to the men and women of our armed forces to reliably provide ample funding for the common defense, year after year, by strong bipartisan support. With that, let me turn to Senator Coons.

Sen. Coons (DE)19:34 – 25:25

Thank you so much, uh, Chairman, uh, and I wanna thank all of our witnesses today. uh and echo uh a number of the things the chairman just said you'll hear them in my remarks we have worked closely and well together as have our staff and we agree on many of the core points um that the chairman just raised in particular the four hundred million appropriated for ukraine uh and the importance of the state partnership program in connecting american uh guard uh elements to uh some of the countries around the world as they sought to emerge from the warsaw pact or as they sought to develop a modern military uh they were great partnerships um let me also join in a special thank you to lieutenant uh general healy at his final appearance before our subcommittee i'm sure you're relieved uh but frankly um you and your family i just wanted to thank you uh for your service your components all do an extraordinary job of balancing uh both civilian lives and a military career uh and i think that does not get enough recognition so let me begin by thanking all the men and women who you represent of the Guard and Reserve, uh, who are a critical part, um, of, uh, the full U. S. military. Uh, many of us, uh, became, were reminded once again, uh, of that balance, uh, when shortly after the President, uh, launched, uh, Operation Epic Fury, uh, components of our home state, uh, Guard and Reserve were mobilized or put on notice for deployment as were two units from Delaware. Um, while we have policy differences, uh, on this war, Um, this was just the latest demonstration of the larger point that the Garden Reserve are absolutely essential uh to uh our US military. Um, I joined um the Chairman in um grieving over the loss of thirteen Americans, um, so far and the hundreds who've been wounded. Um, and not only do our prayers go to their families, but um our hope for um success in the peace negotiations are currently underway. Um, today's hearing is on the Garden Reserve's fiscal year twenty-seven budget. uh and it comes in the much larger context of a one point five trillion dollar uh defense budget request submitted by the president the pentagon is just starting literally just starting today uh to put details of this budget online um but what we know so far is that the overall request shows in my view a misunderstanding of the balance um that our nation requires uh the twenty seven budget request is for a record forty four percent increase in defense Um, and there are many programs and initiatives across uh munitions and shipbuilding, um space and cyber, uh effective procurement strategies that have widespread bipartisan support. Um, and in my view we have to respond to the increasing collaboration and partnership between our adversaries the PRC, Russia, Iran, the DPRK across the globe. Um, but this top-line number did not emerge from a thoughtful policy-making approach from the Pentagon. planning staff, it was a demand tweeted by the president. Um, and I'll join with the chairman in saying this, last year the OMB chose to request a critical part of the defense budget inside the budget reconciliation process, which is not a guarantee and is a partisan process. Um, and that choice last year and the timing of it produced billions of dollars in mistakes. And OMB rather than recognizing um that error, um this year has tripled the size of that bad idea to three hundred and fifty billion. And that uncertainty will not give our defense industrial base the predictability to plan. Um, we've also seen uh defense programs added at the last minute or nicknamed simply to please the president uh which I don't think helps the department differentiate between genuine core needs nice to have items and vanity projects. Um, I I also have uh concerns about how the department proposes this record request, which includes cuts to programs and services all Americans rely on. Um, but let me uh move forward. Um, I firmly believe that Chairman McConnell, Chair Collins, Vice Chair Murray, myself and all the others can figure out a responsible way to fund the government without leaving to our children trillions uh in debt and deficits, uh and without harming healthcare, transportation and education. But that is a broader conversation. Before us today um is how we support the Guard and Reserves. I'm a very strong proponent of the Guard and Reserves, um especially folks in my home state uh who have deployed uh repeatedly. Um this subcommittee has to ensure each of the components testifying today are trained, equipped and ready to answer that call. Uh and I am concerned about some ideological choices made over the last fourteen months that have hit uh your components with a one-two punch as your O and M accounts have been diverted to pay for operations abroad and at the southwest border um and as the administration has shown some real hostility to the civilian members um through a hiring freeze, no pay raise and OPMs on and off literally personally approving every new hire. No private business would run their company that way, and you don't deserve uh this distraction and chaos. On the positive side, and again I agree very much with the Chairman, the billion dollars for the National Garden Reserve equipment account is a welcome addition and I look forward to hearing how you're planning to use those forces to modernize and protect yours and in closing the state partnership program, I think dollar for dollar punches way above its weight. All of us know our our home state partner, whether it's ecuador and jibouti in the case of kentucky uh or it is trinidad and tobago in the case of delaware i've seen it on the ground i've heard about it from combatant commanders uh and i think it pays great dividends so i look forward to hearing about ways we can support many valuable programs through the guard and reserve uh and to work in partnership with our allies in cyber and medical and combat specialties and others our nation needs um and deserves and appreciates the the service and support of the components you represent Mister Chairman, I very much look forward to this morning's hearing.

Sen. McConnell (KY)25:27 – 25:45

Thank you very much, uh, Senator Grins. Um, now turn to the panel. Beginning with General Nordhus. And I'd like for each of you to limit your remarks about three minutes would give us a maximum chance for Q and A. And General, would you like to lead off?

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)25:47 – 29:08

Thank you. And before I provide my opening remarks, I ask that we remember our fallen service members across the joint force who have made the ultimate sacrifice for our country they will always be remembered. Uh, Chairman McConnell, Ranking Member Coons, esteemed members of the subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to testify today on the strength of your locally based, globally engaged National Guard. I thank our fifty-four Adjutants General and Senior Enlisted Advisor John Raines who is with me today uh for their counsel. Moreover, I want to thank you, Congress, for your support that underpins everything we do, ensuring a stronger and more secure tomorrow. It's an honor to represent four hundred and thirty five thousand soldiers and airmen of the National Guard. Today nearly forty four thousand guardsmen are engaged worldwide securing our homeland and supporting every combat commander around the globe. Your National Guard has had a remarkable year defined by the scale and simultaneity of our operations. We are powered by our core advantage, the citizen-soldier. they combine the warrior ethos and civilian acquired skills creating an organization that is as innovative as it is lethal a force that is community-based and engage worldwide defending the homeland is the department of war's number one priority this is the national guard's foundational mission our dual mission serving as the primary combat reserve of the army and the air force while also serving as a military first responder in domestic crises This is a challenge we proudly accept. Without hesitation during Operation Midnight Hammer and Epic Fury, National Guard crews delivered decisive blows to Iran in lockstep with our joint force partners. Your National Guard is an indispensable return on investment for America. We represent twenty percent of the joint force, yet we operate on less than four percent of the department's budget. Our decisive capabilities are only possible if our citizens, soldiers and airmen train with modernized equipment, fully interoperable with the joint force. To sustain strategic dominance, we must modernize concurrently with our services to aggressively outpace and overmatch tomorrow's threats with robust investments for today. This year I remain laser focused on sharpening our warfighting edge to increase our guards' readiness and bolster our capabilities and our core missions for homeland warfighting and partnerships. When we serve our citizens in a state active duty status, current policy sends those reimbursement funds back to the treasury. We ask for your support in restoring those state active duty funds that get spent back to our readiness and back to our formations. Our war fighters are our most critical asset, and to support their service, we must enact duty status reform and compensate equal work with equal pay and benefits. In closing, I want to again thank this committee for your unwavering support. Let us pray and continue to support our warfighters in harm's way. Let us stand by them and their families, and we are thankful for their service. We will always keep our promise to our nation and to our citizens to be always ready and always there. Thank you, and I look forward to your questions.

Sen. McConnell (KY)29:08 – 29:15

Thanks, General. Well, let's take the word. This is an Following order, Anderson, Lofgren, Harder and Healy.

Lonnie Anderson (Witness)29:19 – 32:11

Great, thank you, Chairman McConnell. Vice Chair Coons, distinguished members of the subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to testify on behalf of the Commandant of the Marine Corps about your Marine Corps reserve. I'm honored to be here with my incoming senior enlisted leader, Sergeant Major Patrick Fey. Marine Corps reserve is a critical component of our nation's defense. We provide thirty percent of our total force capabilities with three point two percent of the Marine Corps's budget. We are not a strategic reserve held for a distant crisis. We are a globally engaged operational force that provides the Marine Corps strategic depth and the ability to augment and reinforce the active component, at a moment's notice. Our relevance is defined by our readiness. Providing combat-ready units to global operations, the reserve is seamlessly integrated with the total force. In fiscal year twenty twenty five, we activated reserve Marines Across five combatant commands. Today, we have Marines activated in every geographic combatant command to include combat operations in CENTCOM and afloat on our Marine expeditionary units. These deployments are not just a measure of our readiness, but it's how we build it. We are growing a more capable, combat-seasoned reserve force that's going to be prepared for high-end conflict. This level of readiness and modernization is directly enabled by your support. We thank the subcommittee for its continued support especially through the National Guard and Reserve equipment account. For the Marine Corps Reserve, Negria is not just a funding line. It's a war-fighting requirement and the primary tool that enables enables our modernization. These funds allow us to field the modern platforms and systems our Marines need to train as they fight. With ninety-nine percent execution rate across recent fiscal years, the Marine Corps has proven its ability to execute with discipline and reserve, and speed while maintaining our services clean audit for the last three years. Reserve readiness requires modern infrastructure. The Marine Corps Reserve occupies one hundred and forty-eight reserve training centers across forty-seven States, and the average condition in our portfolio is poor. While we aggressively pursue efficiencies through programs like facility sustainment restoration and modernization and military construction, Navy Reserve, to slow this decline, the disparity between our requirements and resources is growing. Continued support for our military construction and sustainment accounts is essential to provide safe, secure, and modern facilities where our Marines train. Because at the heart of the success is our Marines, sailors, and families who serve with unwavering dedication. They are the foundation of our readiness. With your continued support, I'm confident that the Marine Corps will remain what our nation expects us to be, an elite, combat-ready force, prepared to answer a call, any time, at any place. Thank you for the opportunity to testify today. It's a great time to be a Marine Reservist. I look forward to your questions.

Richard Lofkin (Witness)32:14 – 35:31

Good morning, Chairman McConnell, Ranking Member Coons, and distinguished members of this committee. For a hundred and eleven years, the Navy Reserve has provided critical strategic depth for the fleet and the joint force. When our nation calls, we answer, ready, lethal, and all in to fight and win today. We are building the Navy of the future and defining the era of American sea power. Today we are a a resilient, agile, globally present, and combat critical force that is fully integrated into the Navy's mission. With me today is our Force Master Chief Nikki Rios, a tireless advocate for our sailors and their families. Forrest and I thank you for the opportunity to address this committee on behalf of our incredible Navy Reserve sailors. Over the last couple of months in support of Operation Epic Fury, our Logistics Port Wing, flying the C-forty and C-one-thirty aircraft, have evacuated over twenty eight hundred personnel, including families, out of harm's way and demonstrated critical aerial refueling capabilities for the Navy all while supporting critical carrier strike group logistics. These same squadrons have delivered thousands of pounds of ord- of critical cor- cargo and tactical airlift support to SouthKom, protecting our homeland and safely relocating our teams out of the path of Hurricane Melissa. When our nation calls and our fleet calls, the Navy Reserve answers, delivering logistics when and where they're needed. Your support for the KC one thirty J and the President's budget will ensure we can continue to answer that call with the capability and capacity our nation requires. Our North Star is clear. We are unambiguously focused on war fighting readiness. Today, fourteen thousand of our fifty-nine thousand Navy Reserve sailors are on active duty orders, serving in every area of responsibility. Our sailors are deployed twenty-four seven, three sixty-five, restoring peace through strength. while advancing the foundry, the fleet, and how we fight. We continue to modernize our force and align our resources to war-fighting priorities ensuring we're ready to fight and win, today, tomorrow, and well into the future. Our most significant contribution to the nation's defense and the very foundation of our deterrence posture is our people. A lethal, ready, and resilient force is not built to steal in circuits alone. It's forged from the talent, training, and motivation of our sailors. Therefore, I ask for your full support in funding the RP N, the OMNR, and degree appropriations at the President's budget level. Our investment in our sailors is critical to enabling a mobilization and combat ready force. Every drill weekend, every exercise, every mobilization must sharpen our edge and must be matched by investment in modern equipment. To this end, we're posturing our force to deliver advanced combat focused capabilities that the fleet demands. Replacing our aging C-one-thirty Tango fleet with the modern KC-one-thirty J Super Hercules meets the fleet's demand to enable contested logistics and sustain maritime power. As I've shared with many with you uh many of you, our C-one-thirty Tango fleet, operated exclusively by the Navy Reserve, is the Navy's only long-range intra-theater lift of oversized cargo. Last year, this wing s- moved over seventy-two thousand passengers and twenty-two million pounds of cargo. However, this fleet is aging and lacks modern survivability and communication equipment needed for contested environments. We're grateful for the strong bipartisan alignment on this priority. Chairman McConnell, Ranking Member Coons, and members of the committee, thank you for the continued support of the Navy Reserve, the sailors, the civilians, and the families who make our mission possible. I look forward to your questions.

Robert D. Harter (Witness)35:34 – 38:23

Good morning. Chairman McConnell, Ranking Member Coons, and distinguished members of this committee. Thank you for the opportunity to be here today. On behalf of Command Sergeant Major Gregg Betty, and the more than one hundred and eighty thousand soldiers and civilians, of your army reserve thank you for your support of our warrior citizens and their families. For just six percent of the total army budget, the army reserve provides over half of the army's maneuver support forces, including the majority of theater level medical engineer and sustainment units, and more than ninety-five percent of the army's total bulk fuel distribution capacity in support of the joint force. You go, we go. That's my message to my active duty teammates. Right now nearly nine thousand Army Reserve soldiers are deployed, supporting Army and joint force requirements at home and around the globe, to include support to Operation Epic Fury and operations on our su- our southern border. Our soldiers are in the fight. To keep pace with emerging threats and to prepare for large-scale combat operations or LISCO, we are transforming. The foundation of this transformation is our shift to a geographic mission command, a model that replaces a C-two structure, Built for predictable GWAT deployments. With the geographic alignment that better supports building readiness for LISCO. To ensure our soldiers and units remain ready. I ask for your help in three key areas. First, predictable funding. Continuing resolutions and government shutdowns have huge readiness impacts. And the part-time nature of our force makes missed training days nearly impossible to recover. Second, continued support of our OMAR and RPA funding. In a major conflict, more than thirty-five thousand Army Reserve soldiers are required within the first sixty days. We must be ready. Third, continued support of the much appreciated National Guard and Reserve Equipment Account, or NEGRIA, which allows for the flexible flexible procurement of critical equipment. On seven March, my Command Sergeant Major and I were on the tarmac in Dover, Delaware, greeting our six fallen Army Reserve heroes as they returned home from the CENTCOM AOR. More than thirty Army Reserve soldiers were wounded in that same attack, Chueba in Kuwait. We honor their sacr- sacrifice, and it affirms our resolve to ensure every Army Reserve soldier receives counter-drone equipment and training at pace with the Army in joint force. To that end, we've dedicated nearly a third of our degree of appropriation to counter UAS systems that will cont- and will continue to invest in these lifesaving technologies. In closing, while we are your Army reserve, We are not a force in reserve. We are in the fight. The resources you provide are critical to ensuring the young men and women our army in our army reserve stay combat ready. Thank you for your time today, and I look forward to your questions.

John P. Healy (Witness)38:27 – 41:27

Chairman McConnell, Frankie Memmer-Kunz, distinguished members of the subcommittee, it's an honor for me one last time to be here with my senior enlisted advisor, Chief Master Sergeant Nunes, representing sixty seven thousand Air Force Reserve airmen. We are a strategic advantage and a cost-effective investment, not a back-up force. Our airmen's unmatched experience provides the strategic depth to deter our adversaries. Our partnership builds interoperability with our allies and partners. Our recent surge for Operation Epic Fury proves we're always ready and accessible to respond to any crisis, in less than seventy-two hours. This is the Air Force reserve advantage in action. When properly resourced, we're a cost-effective solution for all DAF mission areas. We operate our installations twenty-eight days a month on just twenty-five percent of our force delivering mission-ready airmen for only thirty cents on the dollar. FY twenty-five's closeout was our best on record. Your support and our data-driven tools enable precise resource management and risk-informed decisions. The Air Force Reserve is efficient, experienced, accessible, and lethal in every mission set. We need your support to maintain this maintain this advantage. Currently, seventy-seven percent of our fleet is over thirty-nine years old. Supply chain shortages, threatened aircraft availability, and a one point five billion dollar backlog means requirements are rapidly outpacing our resources. And Greta is a critical modernization agility in maximizing an opportunity to maximize purchasing power. I look forward to the discussion on the change from a dedicated congressional appropriation to the presidential budget. We are currently hollowing out our nation's future combat capability through disproportionate divestment. Over the fight up, the Air Force Reserve is projected to lose twenty point one percent of our inventory, a significant imbalance compared to the other components. Our number one priority has been and will remain concurrent and proportional fielding of advanced aircraft. As our crews prove their value right now in epic fury, disproportionate divestment is unnecessarily adding risk to national security. That security hinges on our seamless interoperability with our allies and partners. Recent operations have proven this is an urgent necessity, not an option. Now in its second year, our Reserve Allies and Partner program continues to build global interoperability. While operating on a near-zero budget, we've conducted seventy-one engagements last year, including formal partnerships with the United Kingdom and France, while establishing new security pathways with the Netherlands and the Philippines. prioritizing this program as a cost-effective investment that enables our allies to share the burden of strategic deterrence. I'd like to take this last opportunity to thank you and this body for your continued support of the Air Force Reserve and our war fighters. I'd also like to thank my wife, Cathy, whose unwavering support to the men, women, and families of the Air Force Reserve, and to me, uh, deserves note in this record. Thank you very much, and I look forward to your questions.

Sen. McConnell (KY)41:28 – 43:45

thank you general good luck we know that drones are gonna play an increasing role in modern warfare i remember recently reading that someone described ukraine as follows the silicon valley of drone development in other words the leader in the world in this new advanced technology that becomes increasingly important in warfare yet i'm having a hard time finding american military people or civilian military leadership who fully understand the significance of continuing to support our friends and allies in ukraine so let me ask each of you in terms of your own experience have you ever been to ukraine any of you no one ok well i'm not blaming you but that underscores part of the problem we're running into in getting proper attention attention by the civilian leadership that you all ultimately report to to understand the importance of avoiding at the end of the conflict the headline that says russia wins america loses not a headline that i think does us any good in our efforts continue to provide the leadership that we need uh not just for our own country but to have a stable world, America needs to be in the leader on the cutting edge of the biggest problems. What are you doing to make sure the Guard Reserve is best postured to adopt the lessons learned from Ukraine?

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)43:49 – 44:46

Chairman, uh, to start off with, uh, just last month I went down to Indiana uh at camp atterbury where they're working with uh t rex uh and t rex stands for technology readiness experimentation and exercise and so uh some of the drones that you've seen admiral cooper use over in uh san com have been built uh through that incredible uh partnership i recently uh passed on the tag of indiana to the tag of uh north dakota uh to make sure that they're taking a look at uh how we're doing that and how we're testing and uh bringing that capability to the next level uh the national guard is incredible on building innovative and individuals and new capabilities and we look forward to working with the department the joint staff uh giada four O one uh the joint uh inter-agency task force on uh how we get the next level of uh drones uas's and counter uas systems

John P. Healy (Witness)44:48 – 46:12

sorry yeah The Air Force Reserve has also participated from the onset of the, of the conflict in Ukraine, while not directly in Ukraine, but providing quite a bit, bit of technological experience and help with month-to-month advancements in terms of what the Ukrainians are using. Uh, on a separate note, we are learning quite a, quite a bit from how to counter these drone drones as well. Last year, the Air Force Reserve, with our ten unit equipped bases that we're responsible for, used seventy eight million dollars at the end of year to purchase a counter SUAD system uh which is being deployed month to month right now we've got two of them deployed currently in addition to this we also have a counter SUADs a rapidly deployable counter SUADs system and in the uh in the early days of epic fury there was quite a bit of incursions into some of our bases uh from drones and our rapidly deployable version of this kit was sent to barksdale within thirty hours of request Uh, and in that first night we actually had our first drone knockdown as well. So, uh, we are certainly taking advantage of what the, what we're learning from a defensive perspective, but in a, at the small level, at the one, two, three, four person level, we're, we're making sure that our best and smartest are in Germany and best helping out what they're advancing month to month in Ukraine.

Lonnie Anderson (Witness)46:13 – 46:59

If I could share, it's a daily conversation in the Marine Corps, uh, on the lessons that are being learned and particularly for marine forces reserve our drone attack team in the marine corps is led by two reservists the talent that we have uh in the reserves uh rises to the top and in fact they were just promoted meritoriously to staff sergeant by the department of war due to their efforts in uh how do we use attack drones in the marine corps and second over the next uh four years we're standing up our our what we're calling our fourth lad our low altitude air defense so we have our counter uas uh and ballistic missile capabilities and detection in the marine corps uh, and Marine Corps Reserve because we've seen that through force design. You've seen it in the current conflict where long-range precision fires, and the counter-UAS is gonna be a priority for our forces in the field. So, we're, uh, we're getting it after in that way. Mister Chairman, thank you.

Robert D. Harter (Witness)47:00 – 47:42

Mister Chairman, we're, uh, in the Army Reserve, we're driving on that in my opening statement. Obviously not only what happened in Ukraine or what's going on in Ukraine, but what happened in Kuwait, uh, to - to our Army Reserve formation. Uh, to that end, I mean, we are procuring, uh, anti-drone qui- kit using the GRIA. We will be testing seventeen technologies at our integrated exercise this June, Operation Sentinel Justice, to include running our first ever kinetic drone range, where we will have expendable drones coming in and soldiers with their weapons in the proper site kinetically engaging and being able to defend themselves. So the Army Reserve, we take this very seriously. We're nested with the Army and and Joint Task Force four O one to make sure we have the latest technology.

Richard Lofkin (Witness)47:45 – 48:11

Mr. Chairman, I would add that, uh, for the Navy in a forced design standpoint, we are investing in, uh, in billets that, uh, support both, uh, undersea warfare and, uh, and and surface assets from a, uh, from an unmanned perspective. Critical for us is the, uh, in that degree of funding as well as, uh, is using that to, uh, to fund, uh, unmanned systems, uh, and some of the, uh, other assets that we'll use both for, uh, aerial refueling and, uh, expeditionary logistics. So it ties in together, sir.

Sen. McConnell (KY)48:14 – 49:25

i have one more question yeah directed uh uh directed general harter that i admit has a kentucky connection but it's i think important to move in the direction of where the warfare is headed kentucky manufactures and produces ultra lightweight camouflage net system commonly referred to as all cans both ukraine and russia have placed a high priority on passive defenses like modern camouflage against drones given the vulnerability of legacy camouflage systems against modern sensors and drones we're likely to face in the future to what extent is the army accelerating fielding of olcans at the speed of relevance does the current procurement strategy adequately address the requirements of the army reserve

Robert D. Harter (Witness)49:27 – 50:00

oh thanks chairman we we are tied into uh to the army's procurement of olcan that that is a game changer for us we're getting rid of all of our legacy systems we still have some of those And I think what the battlefields of Ukraine will show, that some of the basics of just getting back to cover and concealment, overhead cover, uh, and systems like Alt-Kan that is, defeats IR and helps per- defeat some of the sensing systems, uh, goes a long way towards insurance survivability on the battlefield. So the, the Army Reserve is synched with the Army in changing out our legacy systems for systems like Alt-Kan.

Sen. Coons (DE)50:03 – 52:41

Thank you so much, uh, Chairman. Uh, I could not agree more with your first question. Um, have you been to Ukraine? Um, Senator Shahin led a bipartisan uh delegation um, through which I recently had the chance to visit Odessa, uh, and to see deployed counter drone systems that had been provided uh several years ago to the Ukrainians who are defending Odessa, uh, to see deployed uh naval assets that had been donated by the United States, and to talk to um, to uh really critical um US leaders uh from the army who are helping learn the lessons of Ukraine. Uh, and I think, uh, what I've seen and observed both in briefings and on the ground is that Ukraine is not just uh fighting uh bravely and with great determination against Russian brutality and aggression but they are innovating into the next generation of warfare, and it is our dramatic loss if we fail to embrace and learn those lessons and to stand with those defenders uh my first event this morning was with the Archbishop of the Ukrainian Catholic Church um in a bipartisan uh breakfast. And I spent Sunday uh at a Ukrainian church in Delaware uh and met a double amputee, a veteran uh of the Ukrainian armed forces and a an American mother whose son, with no ties to Ukraine, uh volunteered, deployed and was killed uh by Russians in combat. So I recommend to you uh the Chairman's insight. Um on Negria, uh I am encouraged that the DOD has finally included in the base budget request a billion dollars. Um, a- and, but I am concerned about one thing. Um, one of the most important features historically about how we have appropriated Negria funds, is our requirement that all of you, as the chiefs of the reserve components, administer the funds. Um, this ensures the garden reserves actually prioritize their own requirements, because at times there is a disconnect. Um, are you aware of any proposed changes to this process, any of you? No. Um, then let me simply say on the record, um, it is my hope and intention that the Garden Reserve will remain uh, in control of the procurement and deployment decisions being made uh through that. Um, one of the reasons I pay attention to this um, is that at times um, big army, big air force uh does not make the same deployment decisions as the garden reserves. Um, this is a parochial question, but General Nordhaus, can you describe uh the operational benefits of completing the C one thirty J updates across all the guard units who are not currently so equipped.

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)52:43 – 53:32

Um thanks thank you member Coons uh Senator um the C one thirty uh is just a great aircraft uh all the way across the board for moving tactical airlift and things uh across not only the battlefield but across the homeland in response uh the C one thirty J adds another pallet position so it uh has extended range and has extended ability to take equipment and people and capabilities to where they need to go so we appreciate the incredible funding of the c one thirties uh from congress uh we have um uh moab twelve uh that we will push out shortly so there's three units left with the h models and then arkansas which has the uh training uh and then uh the lcs up in uh new york So we appreciate Congress's support on the C-one-thirties.

Sen. Coons (DE)53:32 – 53:39

And we have heard directly from Ofgren about the importance, uh, of updated C-one-thirties, uh, for the Navy Reserve as well.

John P. Healy (Witness)53:39 – 53:41

Sir, sir, if I could inject as well, with the,

Sen. Coons (DE)53:41 – 53:41

Those.

John P. Healy (Witness)53:41 – 54:07

we have three remaining squadron of C-one-thirty H's in the Air Force Reserve. And while they're very capable and modernized with new engines, they're still a thirty year old aircraft and not included in any relevant O plans, uh, for the Department of War, which leaves, which leaves us in the position of if we wanna participate, we have to bring our own maintenance associated with it. So, very keen on, on the Air Force Reserve perspective as well to get modernized and into those Js as well.

Sen. Coons (DE)54:07 – 55:02

Thank you. That's helpful. And your earlier testimony about the disproportionate divestment of platforms across all of your components, uh, is something I keep in mind. Um, the Guard and Reserve Forces have been tasked with expensive operational requirements, uh, that are including operations on the southern border and deployments, um, to Washington DC and other states. Um, all of you plan your O and M needs uh for the year without these unexpected additional requirements. How has the increased operational tempo impacted your readiness? Every one of you, but you started this. Uh, " your readiness is your relevance", that is a memorable sentence. What trade-offs are you having to make in terms of uh maintenance, training, flying hours, uh, as for example guardsmen and reservists are deployed to um, patrolling Washington DC and beautification projects, rather than being truly trained, equipped and ready for participation uh in combat. General.

Lonnie Anderson (Witness)55:02 – 55:48

And thank you for the question. If readiness off the top, just as uh if I could, you know, we we normally get our reservists thirty-nine days a year. That's how much we get to train with them. So anytime I can get them on orders, I'm gaining readiness, whether or not it's medical, some other training, we'll find a way as Marines to get some additional tactical training regardless of the mission. Although yet we have not been tasked with Southwest Border or - or - or other missions, what we do in the Marine Corps, and because of the commandant's drive to optimize the use of the reserves, we plan our deployments across the FIDEP. We know what units are going out to twenty thirty, twenty thirty-one, that helps them plan their lives, helps them plan their career and their families. So, so far, everything that we've been conducting in the reserves was already budgeted. Now we're working on POM twenty eight and twenty nine in the out years. Uh, but for the Marine Corps, we have yet to see an impact on our, uh, overall operating funds.

Sen. Coons (DE)55:48 – 55:52

Mr. Chairman, if I could ask General Nordhaus to answer the question as well, then we'll move on.

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)55:53 – 56:20

I'm Senator Coons. Yeah, as we work uh with the training that we do across the border statutory requirements, uh we continue to get after that across the fifty-four. Uh, we are seeking reimbursement from the Department of War, and they're working with MOUs with Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security. So we continue to work to get after our training and make sure that our our soldiers and airmen are always ready and always there and we'll continue to work with the department, on those reimbursements.

Sen. Coons (DE)56:21 – 56:35

I look forward to hearing back from you about those reimbursements. I think it's important that you have the equipment, the training, the resources you need to carry out your core mission and that there be comp- that there be reimbursement for um unexpected and additional missions. Thank you, Mister Chairman.

Sen. McConnell (KY)56:36 – 56:37

Senator Oven.

Sen. Hoeven (ND)56:37 – 57:32

Thank you, Mister Chair. Uh, thanks to all of you for being here and for the incredible work that you and all the members of our uh Department of War are doing, it's just it's unbelievable. And we're behind you a hundred percent and we appreciate you so much, all of you. Uh, General Nordhaus, two quick items, uh, right off the top. One is, uh, we've got an Air Guard unit now that actually works in the missile fields with the Mounted Air Force Base uh, security police, great operation, ongoing, working with the active duty on a full-time basis. Incredible example of how you guys are, yeah, in the fight every day. Want to commend you on that and emphasize it. And the other is our Jamestown readiness, uh, our Jamestown facility for the eight seventeenth Combat Engineer's they've been operating out of the civic center there for a long time the a facility for them has to be a priority they're often deployed unit you know that just wanna hear uh your thoughts as far as supporting that

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)57:33 – 57:48

uh senator hovind thank you for uh the question and for the support uh it's my understanding it's currently in design expected thirty five uh percent design by august and will continue to work uh with congress and with uh army national guard on on funding it

Sen. Hoeven (ND)57:48 – 58:31

Thank you, sir. You referenced the T-REX program, and as you know, uh, our uh, uh, air, Army Guard uh base, Camp Grafton, North Dakota is a T-REX site. And we're looking forward to exercises there in August. We've already uh emphasized the importance of drone warfare. Uh, we've been at all thr- all things UAS and counter-UAS down our state for over twenty years. And so talk to me about what can be accomplished at that T-REX site, and then I'm gonna ask our reserve members the same thing. because this is a DOD designation and this drone effort is DOD wide uh department of war wide so your thoughts and the other members thoughts on what can be accomplished with these T-rex sites for drones and counter drones

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)58:31 – 59:21

thanks senator uh when i went to add a barrier i got to see and talk with fifteen uh people from industry as they integrate each of the pieces and parts uh in capabilities into drones along with about a hundred of our guardsmen who are bringing the capabilities and understanding uh the impacts from the ukraine conflict and then across the board for counter-us and uh and us systems so each of the uh defense industrial base experts they really appreciated how this t-rex is going because they can fail fast they can then go back make adjustments to whatever their system is and then integrate it with all the other players to make sure those drones or drone systems are top of the notch So, our Department of Defense can take a look at what capabilities they bring, and then buy the right systems, best in breed.

Sen. Hoeven (ND)59:22 – 59:27

Thank you, sir. Let's go to the Corps, and then just down the line. Uh, what can we do on these TREK sites for the Corps?

Lonnie Anderson (Witness)59:27 – 59:41

Yeah, Senator, for uh the TREK sites, while I I don't have uh the depth of knowledge that General Nordhaus does, where we do our primary work is the dog, the Defense Autonomous Working Group. That's where we spend a lot of our time developing our drone tactics is through, uh is through that lane.

Sen. Hoeven (ND)59:41 – 59:42

'Kay, Navy.

Richard Lofkin (Witness)59:43 – 1:00:12

Senator, we're spending most of our time right now with the USV RONs and UUV RONs, both uh uh ma- or unmanned uh surface vessels and uh undersea vessels as well. I think one of the critical things that uh that all of the Reservers bring to the fight is is not just their military skill sets, but also uh their industry civilian skill sets that they can bring to the fight as well too. So the things that we're seeing is that innovative uh spirit and can-do attitude that comes uh every time that uh we have the opportunity to train and uh and bring uh bring those people uh into and execute uh missions and operations.

Sen. Hoeven (ND)1:00:13 – 1:00:14

Thank you. Army?

Robert D. Harter (Witness)1:00:14 – 1:00:35

Senator, any opportunity that we have to train uh especially in this type of environment with drones and technology, uh the Army Reserve's all in. I know one of our challenges, and we did, we've got some clearance at some of our training locations, the FAA clearance to be able to operate, you know, drones uh to enable our counter drone efforts. So if we have that in North Dakota, the Army Reserve's all in.

Sen. Hoeven (ND)1:00:36 – 1:00:51

So that's great comment. and that's one of the unique things about north kota is we have it statewide now we're the only state that has the uh fa raw data data uh radar feed so we can do exactly that's one of the reasons we've been designated uh the t-rex site

Richard Lofkin (Witness)1:00:51 – 1:00:51

right

Sen. Hoeven (ND)1:00:51 – 1:00:52

so thanks for bringing that up

John P. Healy (Witness)1:00:54 – 1:00:55

yeah senator lincoln

Sen. Hoeven (ND)1:00:54 – 1:01:01

air force only appropriate that you baton clean up here cause you're doing a ton out there at grand forks and and we appreciate it

John P. Healy (Witness)1:01:01 – 1:01:34

i appreciate that sir uh well we we're unfamiliar generally with the t- t-rex system uh, absolutely, if there's an opportunity for us to get better training, better equipment, better exercises. Currently, in our Air Force generation model that we're currently using, our expeditionary wings, uh, are getting a certification event to authorize the organic nature of a unit to pick up and deploy. And part of that includes, uh, counter drones, counter UAS training. So, anything that might actually accelerate that a bit more, we'll more than welcome to join in on. Thank you.

Sen. Hoeven (ND)1:01:34 – 1:01:38

again thanks to all of you gentlemen we appreciate it very much thank you mister chair

Sen. McConnell (KY)1:01:40 – 1:01:42

senator Baldwin and then senator Capito

Sen. Baldwin (WI)1:01:43 – 1:02:23

thank you mister chairman um lieutenant general harder we have had thousands of active duty and reserve soldiers participate in combat operations against iran over the last several weeks and thirteen us service members have been killed Hundreds more have been injured since the war began. So I would like you to please identify and explain any differences between how soldiers in the active duty and reserve components are screened for injuries and given medical care as they return from combat deployments, like those in the Middle East.

Robert D. Harter (Witness)1:02:24 – 1:03:16

Uh, thank you, Senator Baldwin, for that question. Good talking to you last week. So, I think when it comes to our soldiers on the battlefield, We're treated as one team. We we we're we're treated uh by the way, phenomenal treatment, what I'm getting anecdotally from uh from our wounded that came back, also by Kuwait medical care and then going up through Landstuhl, uh and then getting back here to the United States. Two quick points I I would offer is i- it's bringing the family members into that process quicker. I think some of our skill sets have atrophied on how we notify families of wounded soldiers. Obviously our fallen we're pretty good at, so making sure family members are tracking the status of their soldier. Um, and then once we get back to our mobilization site, my biggest concern is that soldiers are screened, they've been in a pretty kinetic environment,

Sen. Baldwin (WI)1:03:16 – 1:03:17

Mm-hmm.

Robert D. Harter (Witness)1:03:17 – 1:03:39

and then they go back to home station. And so how do we maintain contact and make sure those soldiers continue to get the care they need? And we're nested with the - the - the uh medical community, our soldier recovery units, SRU's, to continue to maintain that. And then, ma'am, it's just leadership, making sure squad leaders, platoon leaders, and commanders at Echelon are tracking by name.

Sen. Baldwin (WI)1:03:39 – 1:04:05

Thank you, uh, General. I've heard directly from, uh, some army reservists from Wisconsin who returned from the war and said that they initially received less timely and thorough medical services than their active duty counterparts. Has the army reviewed the care reservists are receiving? after deploying in the war against iran and have you identified any problems

Robert D. Harter (Witness)1:04:07 – 1:04:38

so ma'am we are reviewing as is the army exactly what care our soldiers receive uh we we've met with some soldiers as as they've come back through fort hood and back through washington d. c. here and there there were some perceptions i believe and perceptions are pretty important uh that they weren't receiving the same level of uh attention uh We think they have and we're gonna, but we will continue to follow up to make sure that they get the care they need. I'm flying to to Fort Hood in the not so distant future to be to talk to some more of our young men and women.

Sen. Baldwin (WI)1:04:39 – 1:05:12

Thank you. Um, my next question is for you, General Nordhaus. Um, given that members of the National Guard do not receive full and premium free tri-care benefits like their active duty counterparts, Guardsmen can struggle to pay for medical care necessary to keep themselves ready for combat. Can you describe some of the medical readiness challenges that are faced by the National Guard, and how that impacts your ability to deploy?

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)1:05:14 – 1:06:05

Uh, Senator Baldwin, thanks for the question. Uh, all of our National Guardsmen, all four hundred and thirty-five thousand, they're ready to go. Always ready, always there, means something. uh and so as we look at their medical care uh as traditional soldiers and airmen they don't get you know that full-time tricare and so what we see is that probably the largest uh section of readiness comes in the dental health and so when we send soldiers to an mfgi mobe station they don't return or get returned to unit because they're not ready or they're not trained it's because they're not dental ready right And so dental readiness is readiness for our National Guard, and so I think that's very critical. As we look across all of our health care, look forward to working with Congress on incremental approaches to this, so that all of our members can have the health care they need to be always ready and always there.

Sen. Baldwin (WI)1:06:05 – 1:06:31

Thank you. Given how much our military relies on our Guardsmen and reservists for operations, it seems clear that we need to take further action to get the reserve component better access to health insurance and health care. what can congress do to help and do you think it would improve readiness to expand tri-care access including dental to the reserve component

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)1:06:33 – 1:06:40

any health care is great for the national guard we look forward to working with congress but i'd also like to open it up to the other uh reserve chiefs

John P. Healy (Witness)1:06:40 – 1:07:41

yes ma'am uh uh uh absolutely tri-care reserve select right now as a uh as an option was recommended in twenty twenty but it's not scheduled to act put in action until twenty thirty anything we can do for our reserve technicians decreases in individuals cost uh per month of about two hundred and sixteen dollars decreases a family members about three hundred and fifty dollars as they're currently paying through the fe h b in addition to that dental there's a fifteen hundred dollar cap on an individual in terms of what they're authorized when they're not on an order status so put one root canal on the books and you're not qualified to deploy during a normal deployment cycle a hundred and eighty days ahead of a rot- uh a rotation deployment they've got the opportunity to get on orders and get that fixed but in this last execution of epic fury we mobilized our people in seventy-two hours and there's no chance that we're gonna get those people needing that additional care that type of that level of care for that cost benefit

Sen. Capito (WV)1:07:42 – 1:07:42

thank you

Sen. McConnell (KY)1:07:45 – 1:07:49

senator capito followed by senator schien

Sen. Capito (WV)1:07:49 – 1:09:19

Thank you, Mister Chairman, thank all of you for your service and for being here. Before I begin my question, uh, I wanted to acknowledge a tragedy within the Guard community, obviously, um, and I do express my condolences to those who have had, uh, issues with this latest incursion, but we lost two Guard members, uh, from the West Virginia National Guard community the day before Thanksgiving, Specialist Sarah Beckstrom and Staff Sergeant Andy Wolf, was twenty-four were attacked here in Washington DC, while volunteering to make our streets safe. We lost Sarah on Thanksgiving day, and we continue to send prayers to her family in West Virginia. I'm proud to report that Andy has made a a miraculous recovery, not full but miraculous, so far and he threw out the first pitch at the WVU baseball game just recently. So it's a testament I think to the service and sacrifice of our National Guard members and I just want you all to keep them and their thoughts. And their families and their thoughts and prayers and General Nordhaus, thank you for uh everything that you've done. Um, Admiral Lufkin, Gruff Lufkin, excuse me, it's great to see you again, f- and thank you for coming to uh your visit to West Virginia to see the Lockheed Martin uh facility that uh is uh makes significant portions of not just the Navy's KC one thirty J, but also this uh C one thirty variants across all the other services. Now we've already kind of covered ground here on the one thirty J, but I just wanted to give you an opportunity to talk about the significance of that aircraft for for the Navy Reserve.

Richard Lofkin (Witness)1:09:20 – 1:11:09

Senator, I appreciate the question, uh, and thank you for, uh, for the time, uh, in, uh, in West Virginia. Uh, the KC one thirty J as a look at it, it's not just another aircraft for the Navy. Uh, th- really it's the connective tissue for maritime operations, moving people, fuel, and equipment across these vast domains and distances, and, and being able to support the, uh, combatant commanders. In a fight defined by distance, the logistics really is combat power and uh the k c one thirty j delivers on that brings critical refueling capabilities we're seeing that right now in theater right uh uh at the uh at the mouth of the uh state of hormuz that's refueling the air wing it's the first time that the uh navy reserve has uh has refueled aircraft uh uh in a uh in a combat zone and helped evacuate nearly three thousand family members and uh and personnel so it's a real world example of that speed the capability and the capacity under pressure but it also highlights the real challenge that we've got right now that k c one thirty fleet, the tangos right now that we're flying, they're aging, they're thirty five years old. The reliability, the survivability, and really the long-term sustainment are problems, and they're real, and they're growing concerns. So that's exactly why we need to recapitalize and and replace those right now with a more survivable platform. I'll tell you what stood out to me on on our in uh during my time in West Virginia, was this made it real. I mean, I we met somebody that was working uh on that uh on that assembly line, second generation of his family, to work on those aircraft. And he said something that really has stuck with me is that every single American C one thirty that's flying right now has been touched by West Virginians. And what we really felt was that expertise, that pride, and the precision that's built into every single tail that we rely on. So, I mean, for us, bottom line, I mean, that KC one thirty is closing that credibility gap and that capability gap that we need right now. And so the support for uh from you and the rest of the committee is uh critically important as we think about replacing those tails.

Sen. Capito (WV)1:11:09 – 1:11:58

Thank you. Thank you for recounting that story, cuz if you hadn't, I was gonna remind you. of that. Uh, thank you. So, General Nordhaus, thank you for your visit and our exchange in my office just recently. We wou- there's been a lot of talk about dr- uh, drone warfare and there's uh, the the Admiral talked a little bit about, well all of you did, about the innovation that comes from the war fighter, the ones that are in the in the uh in the theater. Um, and there's a lot of soldier inspired innovation that goes on that they bring from their own maybe jobs that they have outside of the reserves. Uh, and I, I would say the Ridge Runner Irregular Warfare Exercise Laboratory, which is uh hosted by our West Virginia National Guard is, is provide some of that. Uh, General, how is the National Guard harnessing that innovation from citizen soldiers to address the new age of warfare? Could you give us a couple examples?

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)1:12:00 – 1:12:09

Uh, Senator Capito, uh, thank you also for highlighting our soldier and airman. Um, as we look at uh Ridge Runner, I'll be there tomorrow,

Sen. Capito (WV)1:12:09 – 1:12:10

Mm-hmm.

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)1:12:09 – 1:13:10

so I'm excited to see that. as we look at innovation our guardsmen uh work out an industry and they bring all that innovation technology on the cyber side they bring those skill sets uh as we look at taking innovation out at the air national guard um and air force reserve test center they take innovation and are taking the angria dollars that we get and are getting eighty percent of the capabilities at twenty percent of the cost cause they're innovating those tools and systems in uh as we go across uh i do appreciate uh the discussion on the uas's and one of the things that we continue to do is innovate with uh how we can protect and defend our bases and on the national guard air national guard and army national guard side we're often operating in a title thirty-two status which doesn't have the same protection and benefits as title ten so we look forward to working with congress on those authorities so that when we're operating for counter us within our defenses also that we have the right authorities

Sen. Capito (WV)1:13:10 – 1:13:12

Thank you. Thank you all very much.

Sen. McConnell (KY)1:13:14 – 1:13:20

OK, Senator Shaheen, following by, followed by Moran, Bozeman and Markowski.

Sen. Shaheen (NH)1:13:20 – 1:15:13

Well, thank you, Mister Chairman, and thank you to each of you for the great job you do representing our National Guard, which are s- the men and women of the Guard are critical, not just to the national security of this country, but to our individual states, and all of us appreciate that. So thank you. Um, and Let me s- start by agreeing with Senators McConnell and Coons in their comments about Ukraine. Um, I hope we are doing everything possible to, um, learn from what is happening in the war in Ukraine and how it's affecting the future of war. Um, I also, General Nordhouse, appreciated your comments about dental care. I don't know why the policies of the government and sadly my home state of New Hampshire, have failed to recognize that the math is part of our health care and it should be treated as such. Um General Nordhaus, thank you for visiting New Hampshire. Um it's the home of the one hundred and fifty-seventh air refueling wing and uh as I'm sure you were told often when you were there, it's the only KC forty-six wing in the country to reach initial operating capacity. And you won't be surprised to learn that I um am concerned about the logistic composite model study at Pease and ultimately I understand that that study has revealed that the wing needs more maintenance billets than are currently um there permanently I I understand that General Pirak had a very good meeting with um our tag and he talked about the importance of maintaining the temporary billets until they can become permanent but can I get your commitment that the one hundred and fifty-seventh is gonna receive those maintenance billet supports that they need um as determined by general pirak and the lcom study

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)1:15:15 – 1:15:49

senator schahin first off thank you for the visit uh last year i planned on visiting uh and flying the uh kc forty six uh just prior to epic fury but uh that's delayed it but i'll be up there to fly the kc forty six um i have spoken with general michelates and uh general pirak uh over the last uh day um to make sure that this is going in the right direction uh i know that the lcom study added ten positions so we will make sure those go in um we're also added the uh twenty nine temporary agrs to make sure that we're moving in the right direction

Sen. Shaheen (NH)1:15:47 – 1:15:47

mmm

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)1:15:49 – 1:16:26

um but we're also continuing that work with the air force and k c forty six as a whole as that platform is so capable and credible going forward we do also uh appreciate that uh what's authorized on the agrs because that full-time resource critical that it's also appropriated uh as well so that we can have those agr so that we can push not only at the one fifty seventh but across the national guard both army and air agr uh and our full-time resources are critical because they build the readiness for our guardsmen to come in on the on not only the weekends but when they come in on their drill status to be always ready and always there

Sen. Shaheen (NH)1:16:27 – 1:17:14

well thank you and thank you for helping to make that argument which the subcommittee will have to take up when when we get to that point in the appropriations process. Um, I also wanna ask you about the remote vision system that it's we know has been an ongoing problem with the KC forty-six. Um, what we're hearing is that Boeing hopes to integrate the um, the revised RVS two point O system into the new builds beginning in twenty twenty seven, but they don't have a timeline for retrofitting k c forty-sixes that are already in service so can you um talk about your understanding with respect to that and do you expect to advocate for that and perhaps general healy might wanna weigh in on that as well

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)1:17:15 – 1:17:56

uh senator so uh i flown the f sixteen for twenty three years and the f thirty five um uh for a little bit of time and air refueling is the most critical thing and you're seeing it play out in epic fury where the national guard has a very large percentage of tankers both k c one thirty-five's and the k c forty-six over there and so we have to be able to do that back and forth so certainly i'll be very focused with the air force in working with uh general healy to make sure the systems that come onboard that we can have the best uh systems capable for our airmen that are out there flying those mission sets and i've never completed a combat mission without refueling either before after or both

Sen. Shaheen (NH)1:17:56 – 1:18:13

and and so again i know that boeing's talking about getting the new um remote vision systems into the planes after twenty seven but how how are you talking to them about what's gonna happen with those already in service

John P. Healy (Witness)1:18:16 – 1:18:28

ma'am i know that there's pressure from the air force for retrofitting the rvs systems on those existing kc forty sixes we've got two units in the air force reserve we're classically associated with one and we have a unit equipped one that's even more

Sen. Shaheen (NH)1:18:35 – 1:18:45

well thank you i'm sure the chair and ranking member will be very interested in what we might do in the defense appropriations bill to help address that as well thank you all

Sen. McConnell (KY)1:18:50 – 1:18:51

peter moran

Sen. Moran (KS)1:18:52 – 1:19:54

chairman thank you um let me join senator Shaheen in expressing concern about uh casey forty six uh uh a's and uh i'm sorry casey forty six one thirty five's and forty six's they matter greatly in kansas both in the active duty and the guard and um i wanna start by asking uh questions about that uh certainly about the safety issue of of uh of of boeing and we're anxious for all of the fleet to be updated with the latest and safest technologies and we saw the need for that epic fury. Um, but our KC forty s- KC one thirty-fives are relied on significantly, but they are an aging fleet. Modernization of that force, um, needs to take place quickly. And I'm asking you, General Nordhaus, about recapitalization plans, uh, particularly for our our Air Air Guard National Guard refueling wings.

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)1:19:56 – 1:20:46

Uh, Senator Moran, thanks for the question. As we look at uh the National Guard, we're in the in the fight every day. Uh, and so when we look at what we're doing over in Epic Fury, we're thirty percent of the operational air force and we're over thirty percent of that air power over in Epic Fury right now. So, critical capability like you said that uh we need for our nation and for our joint force. Uh, we know that we have MOB nine getting ready to go out for all the KC one thirty five. uh wings to uh be able to apply for the next uh k c forty six uh fielding as you know that process is uh is run through the air force corporate process it's uh transparent repeatable and defendable and we'll make sure that uh all wings uh compete fairly for that and we look forward um to mode nine being pushed out uh when those planes come on board

Sen. Moran (KS)1:20:46 – 1:20:48

what what's the time frame you expect general

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)1:20:49 – 1:21:12

uh i don't have the exact time frame right now but i believe it's in uh you know or twenty thirty to early twenty thirties um but we need to modernize the rest of the fleet as well so fourteen of our seventeen kc one thirty five wings are flying uh the um those kc one thirty fives and and they were built in the sixties and the seventies and so they they need to be uh uh modernized as well

Sen. Moran (KS)1:21:13 – 1:22:24

general um uh this is it sounds like an aside it's more than an aside i when when i learned of the difficulties that tankers were having in in uh theater uh a few weeks ago i immediately thought of kansas and kansas family's um both guard and active duty and i would just highlight for you all i had insufficient capability at that time to learn about what planes and what units and whether national guard or kansas was involved in those accidents. And I couldn't get an answer, either in state or in Washington DC. And I think that's a error that needs to be corrected, uh, for the future. Uh, there just was no information for days, and I learned finally mostly from the public press as to what, uh, units, uh, and National Guard, uh, members were involved. Uh, I'd I'd just welcome your help in making certain that in the case of epic fury and and future engagements that we have the capability of learning what's going on for the information of family members back home.

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)1:22:25 – 1:22:37

Absolutely, Senator. We'll we'll take that on. And as uh each week right now, I'm currently speaking with all fifty-four Adjutant's Generals every Monday and Thursday and so we'll continue to work that and make sure that we get timely information to you.

Sen. Moran (KS)1:22:37 – 1:23:08

Uh, thank you very much. I'm I'm getting interested uh again in and engaging in this uh issue of duty status reform. Uh, I'd welcome any support uh that you'd like to make this morning for our efforts to uh address this issue, how can this process be streamlined to provide guard and reserve uh with the efficacy it needs in response and missions, and how do we make sure that our guard members uh and their families uh know what they're entitled to under what status.

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)1:23:10 – 1:23:41

Uh, Senator, I'm I'm gonna speak very quickly, cuz I know my other reserve chiefs are very focused on this as well, but Duty status reform is critical. It simplifies over thirty statuses, uh, down to nine and then in four categories. It helps guarantee, uh, parity with equal pay and benefits for service members, uh, serving side-by-side. It speeds mobility. It increases National Guard readiness and reduces air. And then it creates less frustration for, uh, our service members and their families, and it provides the health care that they need on time.

John P. Healy (Witness)1:23:42 – 1:24:03

Sir, I'd just add onto it. This is clearly and simply a retention issue. Uh, make it easy for our members to serve. We've been working and looking at duty status reforms since I was a Lieutenant Colonel. So that's twenty years we've been looking at this. We finally got some options and opportunities coming up through the House side. So we gladly welcome anything on the Senate side to to coordinate with that.

Sen. Moran (KS)1:24:03 – 1:24:18

We, um, uh, we intend to lead on this issue and would inform my colleagues of the, the value of their support and we welcome their input on how best we can write legislation that gets uh duty reform accomplished. Thank you, Mister Chairman.

Sen. McConnell (KY)1:24:19 – 1:24:20

Thank you, sir. Well, I turn both of them.

Sen. Boozman (AR)1:24:22 – 1:25:06

Um, thank you, Mister Chairman, and thank you uh, Senator Coons, for having this important hearing, and we appreciate you all so very much, and uh, your service to our country. Uh, I also would echo uh, Senator Moran's concern about duty status reform. Uh, I visited with uh several of you about this and know how important it is um general north house congress funded the national guard to purchase gray eagles in fiscal year twenty three and twenty six we understand these platforms are still pending a basing decision um can you explain the tactical advantage of the national guard having the u. a. s. program

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)1:25:08 – 1:26:10

um thanks senator bozeman and it was uh a pleasure visiting uh, Evingfield and Arkansas about a week ago. Uh, you have a terrific uh, Adjutant General and General uh, Chad Bridges. Um, thank you to Congress for three uh, sets of great eagles. The first one has been identified to be bedded down in Arizona. There are two units to be stationed. As we look at the National Guard, the Army National Guard, out of the Army's eighteen divisions, eight of those divisions are in the Army National Guard. And so we need to be interoperable, plug and play, and so as those divisions go down range to plug back in for division that's coming out it needs to have those isr platforms and so the gray eagle provides uh one of those platforms um platform agnostic though and so isr capability and capability like we're seeing being used over in iran right now in the mq nine is critical to the war fight and so it's critical to our divisions that uh our divisions are plug and play into the army uh other divisions

Sen. Boozman (AR)1:26:10 – 1:26:14

Very good. Do you have any idea when the basing decision will be made?

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)1:26:15 – 1:26:20

Um, I don't have a specific, we'll have to get back to you, but it'll be in the, hopefully in the coming year.

Sen. Boozman (AR)1:26:20 – 1:26:43

Good. Thank you. General Healy, uh, we are grateful for our Reserve Airmen and their continued readiness and availability. We understand that you all have done a tremendous job in executing resources given you by Congress. What specific areas should this committee prioritize in the fiscal year twenty-seven budget to preserve the advantage that the air force reserves delivers.

John P. Healy (Witness)1:26:44 – 1:27:44

i appreciate the question, sir, and uh i believe i'm contractually obligated to say fully funding our onm and rpa request would be the simplest answer but obviously i'll go more than that uh we executed our twenty-five funding roughly four point two billion dollars in onm down to eleven million dollars, which was unheard of level of accuracy on our behalf our reserve personnel appropriation of just under three billion dollars, we executed down to just over six million dollars at the end of the year. So, it, with that, with our execution of our flying hour program of a hundred and one point one percent, we essentially created the readiness that we said that we would. Mm-hmm. So, when we asked for, uh, fully funding our current requests for O and M and RPA, we have a, a proven track record that that readiness is what allowed us to generate that mobilization in a ready fashion in seventy-two hours for Operation Epic Fury. So I would ask for that fully funding of O and M and RPA.

Sen. Boozman (AR)1:27:45 – 1:27:48

So, that's your biggest challenge, is the funding?

John P. Healy (Witness)1:27:49 – 1:28:07

Any time a decrease in funding, it creates subsequent challenges along with it. We've got, uh, whether it's, you know, we've talked about already the TRICARE Reserve Select and, uh, with regard to the, the dental as well. Our, our biggest challenge is that and concurrent infielding of uh weapons systems.

Sen. Boozman (AR)1:28:08 – 1:28:31

Very good. Uh. General Harder, I understand the Guard and Reserve continue to rely on the National Guard and Reserve equipment account to update legacy systems. We were happy to see it in, funded for the first time ever in this year's presence budget request. Can you tell us how you use this funding and maintain parity with the active duty components?

Robert D. Harter (Witness)1:28:31 – 1:29:03

No, I appreciate the question, Senator, so we get less than one percent. of the army's modernization budget. So, Negree is critical, it provides almost forty percent of our uh modernization capabilities for us. And so, we will use that to continue after protection systems, counter UAS, as well as modernizing our fleets. Again, we're ninety-five percent of bulk petroleum distribution for the joint force. So as we can modernize our truck and fuel fleets, we use Negree to get after that as well. So it's critical to driving readiness for your army reserve.

John P. Healy (Witness)1:29:06 – 1:29:40

uh i'd just add our concern and and uh not concern but open to the discussion with regard to the change to presidential budget for angria this year versus uh the independent appropriation uh concern for a hundred for for instance in the air force reserve a hundred and fifty five million is what we've executed in the most recent years but as that's programmed out for five years that becomes flat uh due to inflation i would say And quite honestly, our biggest concern with the PB authorization for Ingria is that it never gets to the reserve. So, we're we're concerned about that as well, sir.

Sen. Boozman (AR)1:29:41 – 1:29:54

General Nordhaus, can you very quickly, we talked about this in the office, the importance of the, uh, state partnership program. Can you explain very quickly the importance of funding the partnership program?

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)1:29:54 – 1:30:35

Uh, Senator Bozeman, thank you very much. So the National Guard has a hundred and sixteen partnerships globally. uh it started in nineteen ninety three with thirteen and now we're at a hundred and sixteen uh around the globe the combat commanders love it for the capability that it provides the nations that we partner with love it because it's building partner capacity uh it's building burden sharing we learn as much from them as they do from us and as we continue to grow this program we need the supporting funding so that we can have the bilateral affairs officers we can do key leader engagement and we can continue the robust exercises and partnerships with the nations uh globally.

Sen. Hoeven (ND)1:30:36 – 1:30:37

Thank you, sir.

Sen. Murkowski (AK)1:30:39 – 1:32:28

Thank you, Mister Chairman, gentlemen, thank you for for being here, thank you for your leadership. Uh, I wanna start off my questioning, I'm focused on the uh combat search and rescue um and personnel recovery. I think we all recognize that this is this is an essential capability that has to be maintained. Um, and it's also one of these niche areas where, um, pretty amazing, pretty amazing what, uh, what we see in this capacity. Uh, it was reported, um, in the FY twenty-seven program objective memoram memorandum, uh, cuts to the Air Force combat search and rescue enterprise, particularly the planned elimination of the HC one thirty J combat King two fleet. Um, I have received a a commitment in person from General Wilsbach that uh he will not cut the HC one thirty J's. Uh the budget appears to reflect that. Um but in fairness the fact that it was even up for consideration was was concerning. So General Nordhaus the the National Guard has of course rescue components in Alaska but also in Kentucky, Oregon, New York, California um and General Healy the the Air Force Reserve has these rescue components. um in Oregon, Arizona and and Florida. Um I am assuming that you would agree that cuts to these missions would would severely impair our our not only our operational um abilities but um uh I'm I'm worried about the signals that it would send to our forces if we were to make these cuts, and I just would like some reinforcement from the two of you this morning as to the imperative. for the combat search and rescue mission.

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)1:32:29 – 1:32:37

Uh, Senator Murkowski, uh, it is a pleasure to visit Clear, Eilson and JABRE over the last eighteen months.

Sen. Murkowski (AK)1:32:37 – 1:32:38

Thank you for that.

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)1:32:38 – 1:33:11

Uh, I know the criticality of the search and rescue mission as a previous um, CFAC um, where you're looking at airmen hundreds of miles off the coast of Alaska to intercept, uh, adversary uh, aircraft or to be able to search and rescue. or what we just saw in epic fury where we had to go in and retrieve two downed airmen search and rescue aircraft are critical um general wills bach and i are close we're both committed uh on the c one thirty uh rescue up in alaska and it there's no plan in the president's budget to divest

Sen. Murkowski (AK)1:33:11 – 1:33:13

excellent general healy

John P. Healy (Witness)1:33:13 – 1:33:37

yes ma'am i'd echo that that uh general wills bach's position is unequivocal that he does not support any cuts whatsoever to the czar Uh, I think we're seeing that, uh, by the investment in the HH sixty whiskies that the Air Force Reserve is currently going through and potential for more. I think also yesterday's news about the A ten's extension for two years, critical role in CISAR over in Operation Epic Fury, uh, lends to that as well.

Sen. Murkowski (AK)1:33:37 – 1:34:19

Very good. Thank you, gentlemen. Um, I wanna ask, uh, about the costs that are being incurred, um, in the ongoing Operation Epic Fury. Uh, we anticipate, uh, seeing a relatively large supplemental uh coming before us and so uh trying to understand what it is that um that is being incurred in terms of of the costs um i think general nordhaus you just mentioned that perhaps that the um the guard and the reserve are thirty percent of the of the uh capability in in operation epic fury currently is that correct

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)1:34:18 – 1:34:26

On the international guard side, um the air national guard is at least uh over thirty percent of those forces

Sen. Murkowski (AK)1:34:27 – 1:35:16

so so let me ask you that because that is that is considerable in terms of uh the air guard's um uh contribution um i don't know if it's possible for you all each of you to uh share with the committee your component's contribution to operation epic fury uh and and the cost um for engagement to date. My my interest in this is is I wanna make sure that that cost will be fully captured in the supplemental request, cuz I worry that some of it may be absorbed into the baseline budget um in ways that could degrade your readiness for years to come. So uh General Nordhouse, if you wanna start with that.

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)1:35:18 – 1:35:23

Um, thanks, Senator, and I'll also say our Army National Guard is doing amazing work over there as well.

Sen. Murkowski (AK)1:35:22 – 1:35:23

They are.

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)1:35:24 – 1:35:34

Um, so we are capturing that data right now and we're pulling that in. We're working with the Department of War and we'll provide those those data and funding, uh, up to the committee, uh, as appropriate.

Sen. Murkowski (AK)1:35:35 – 1:35:47

Do you do you share my concern that, um, that that some of this may be absorbed into the baseline? I'm I'm I just want us to know what it is that we should be looking for here.

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)1:35:47 – 1:36:04

Senator, I don't have specifics on that, but certainly all of our aircraft and army formations and and uh guardsmen down range, as we bring that equipment back, we need to make sure we capture all the costs so that we can uh build that readiness back up and rebuild the military uh as we continue to do.

Sen. Murkowski (AK)1:36:05 – 1:36:18

Fair enough. I appreciate that and will look forward to further information, but I truly appreciate the efforts of of all of our services in in this operation as we're moving forward so thank you very much. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Sen. McConnell (KY)1:36:24 – 1:36:28

I'm gonna skip a possible next round and turn to my colleagues. They're good.

Sen. Coons (DE)1:36:29 – 1:37:09

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Um, just one quick concluding question for me, if I might, and then an observation. Um, on the state partnership program, which, uh, Senator Bozeman also asked, um, i- we added twenty-six million dollars, uh, above the president's budget request last year. uh, to improve training and exercise and expand these partnerships. General Nordhaus, I think if I heard you right, uh, from thirteen, today there's a hundred and sixteen, uh, we've heard from several combatant commanders in our recent, uh, hearings just how much they value them. Um, can we work together in the year ahead to expand their scope, their reach, um, and their striking cost-effectiveness?

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)1:37:10 – 1:38:17

Um, ranking member Coons, uh, Senator, absolutely, and what we see is we today another partner will go out to the fifty four to uh possibly uh to partner with and we'll go through our normal process but as we look to each of the combat commands it's just uh incredible capability uh sixty percent of the globe is partnered with the state at less than one percent of the theater security cooperation budget uh it's a force exponential that uh our countries every country i meet with they go on and on about it uh when i was over in um finland sweden and norway with the adjutants generals from each of those you could see the immense amount of pride and connectivity um one of the uh chiefs of defense said that uh they had been partnered with one of our states um not officially through a state partnership program for fifty years but in the last three years where they were partnered it was game changing was his term uh about how it helped them with their capability And we're learning from their military readiness and ours, uh, how we're growing together.

Sen. Coons (DE)1:38:17 – 1:39:42

O- outside of my state's thirty year partnership with Trinidad and Tobago, the very first time I was really, uh, educated on it was in Ukraine, uh, in twenty sixteen. I got to visit with the then new leader of the Ukrainian National Guard. And as they were transitioning from a Soviet, uh, Warsaw Pact style military, um, to a more, uh, NATO style military, um, the routine deployments and training and the joint exercises that emphasize not just military doctrine but also civilian control of the military transparency and accountability uh anti-corruption efforts uh local investments. Um, the the leaders I met with who were Ukrainian uh, Ukrainian military leaders said that their partnership with guardsmen from California over years had made a transformational difference. I've since seen and heard the same thing. in Latvia, in Lithuania, in Nigeria, in Djibouti, uh, I mean in a dozen places around the world. Um, uh, let me just close with an observation you made at the outset. Twenty percent of the joint force, four percent of the budget. I think y- you said general thirty percent for three. Unbelievable value for the dollar. And reinforcing, uh, the values that founded us as a republic, um, you do incredible things with very modest amounts of money, the least we could do. is to honor that service and sacrifice by investing you thank you mister chairman for letting me go on a few more minutes and thank you for your service.

Steven S. Nordhaus (Witness)1:39:42 – 1:39:43

thank you senator coons

Sen. McConnell (KY)1:39:44 – 1:40:13

and uh i wanna thank all of our witnesses thank you for service and your testimony today members of the subcommittee will have a week to submit additional questions for the record senators may submit additional written questions and we ask each of you if you get some of those to respond within thirty days of receiving them subcommittee now stands in recess so it's the call of the chair

Morning digest

Start every morning briefed on yesterday’s hearings

A free weekday email covering yesterday’s hearings and transcripts newly unlocked in the archive.

Free weekday email. Unsubscribe anytime.