Senate seal

Senate · Hearing transcript

DOD Comptroller, Deputy Under Sec., NRO Dir., AF Asst. Sec. Nominations Hearing

Tuesday, July 14, 2026

Summary

  • Committee advanced 2,274 military nominations and vetted four Pentagon nominees pledging clean audit by 2028 and faster acquisition reform today.

  • Jules W. Hurst III (Nominee to be Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), Department of Defense) pledged clean audit by 2028 using AI and consolidated reviews.

  • Sen. King pressed Hurst on Iran war costs, and Hurst confirmed his $29 billion estimate excluded military construction and battle damage.

  • Sen. Sullivan urged quick approval of munitions supplemental while Sen. Slotkin and Sen. Kaine demanded full war cost accounting first.

  • Committee will collect written questions within two business days before voting on nominations amid pending $67 billion defense supplemental request.

Transcript PDF

Download the full transcript as a PDF

Ready to print, read offline or share, with the summary, everyone who spoke and the video time of every paragraph.

Your PDF downloads right away. We also email you a link to it, for another device.

Hearing Details

Witnesses

Members Who Spoke

View on Congress.gov

Transcript

15:23 – 16:45

come to order. And um to to begin with um the Senate has lost a um a giant, a a champion, a former member of this committee uh who though he went on to um other jurisdictions um was one of the strongest advocates for american strength and um american uh partnerships around the world um and and peace through strength um and that's the late uh senator lindsey graham of south carolina and so i'd ask all of us to bow our heads for a moment of silence in memory of senator graham Thank you very much. Um, Mister Ranking Member, and fellow members of the committee, since a quorum is now present, we will um ask the committee to consider a list of two thousand two hundred seventy-four pending military nominations. All of these nominations have been before the committee, the required length of time. Mister Ranking Member, is there a motion to report these two thousand two hundred seventy-four pending military nominations to the senate favorably

16:45 – 16:46

i so move

16:46 – 16:47

is there a second

16:47 – 16:47

second

16:48 – 16:51

the motion has been made and seconded all in favor say aye

16:51 – 16:51

aye

16:51 – 22:18

all opposed say no the ayes have it and the motion carries thank you all and this executive session is now adjourned and welcome to our distinguished visitors uh and their families I thank them for being here and for their willingness to serve their country. Um, the Honorable Jay Hurst has been nominated to serve as the Pentagon's Controller and Chief Financial Officer. If confirmed, he'll be responsible for working with Deputy Secretary Feinberg to develop the defense budget. He would oversee financial management and lead the department's effort to achieve a clean financial statement audit by the end of two thousand twenty eight. As we work toward a total defense top-line of one point five trillion dollars, a figure I have strongly endorsed, we'll need an adept controller. This person will manage a complex funding approach, one that combines base, discretionary appropriations, and mandatory reconciliation dollars. I note that some members of this this committee have concerns with the reconciliation process. Excuse me. Some of those concerns are normal. They've been shared by members of both parties, as the party in power used reconciliation to achieve party-aligned goals. But other concerns, again from colleagues on both sides of the aisle, have been about the lack of information on reconciliation from the Pentagon. I acknowledge that there were problematic delays in apportionment and decision-making through the end of calendar year twenty twenty five. However, I think there has been a significant improvement in execution and information flow over the past six months. And I credit Mister Hurst for his work on that front. We are not yet where we need to be, but we are headed in the right direction. So, uh, I think the committee is, um, going to appreciate Mister Hurst's commitment to, uh, continue providing all members of this committee with a full and free flow of information. Mister Matt O'Malley has been nominated to serve as Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment. It confirmed he will be responsible for helping the department as it implements the Forged Act, strengthens cooperation with allied and partner industrial bases and rebuilds American supply chains. The central challenge facing the Pentagon is not only producing more of what we already have, but also fundamentally changing the way the department acquires and sustains capabilities. The United States must do so if we hope to prevail in a protracted fight against a peer adversary. We must harness the uh innovation of our private sector by moving the defense acquisition strategy to a commercial first approach. I look forward to hearing how Mister O'Malley intends to drive that change. Doctor Eric Hernandez Baquero has been nominated to serve as the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Space Acquisition and Integration. In this role he will act as an Acquisition Executive and as a Senior Architect for Space Systems across the Department of the Air Force. He will be responsible for delivering combat-ready space systems to the joint force and for integrating those weapons with commercial capabilities. The President's budget proposes um to more than double Space Force investments in the coming fiscal year. Doctor Hernandez Hernandez-Bacaro would also be responsible for stewarding the Space Force's sweeping transition to a new portfolio acquisition executive structure. I'm interested in how the Pentagon will continue to make our national security space capabilities, resilient, and proliferated, helping them face both kinetic and electronic attacks. And then Doctor Roger Mason has been nominated as Service Director of the National Reconnaissance Office. In this role he will lead the acquisition, launch, and operation of the nation's space-based reconnaissance systems. These systems provide critical imagery, signals, and other information to the Department of Defense and to the intelligence. community. If confirmed, Doctor Mason would help lead the office as it enters a new phase of intelligence data collection. The number of government and commercial satellites continues to grow rapidly. Consequently, we are collecting a dramatically increasing volume of data. We must use artificial intelligence effectively, if we hope to manage, analyze and deliver intelligence from these rapidly growing data sets. the nominee will also have to balance expanding commercial partnerships against the need to protect our most sensitive technologies and capabilities from our adversaries. So, uh, we look forward to hearing how Doctor Mason intends to meet these demands. With that, I welcome our witnesses and our guest, and I turn to my friend and colleague ranking member, Jack Reed.

22:19 – 29:04

Well, thank you very much, Mr. Chairman, and, uh, before I make comments about today's hearing i too wanna recognize lindsey graham um lindsey was um a unique personality i had the privilege of serving with him in the house and then later he joined us in the senate he was an articulate relentless advocate for our soldiers sailors marines airmen and guardians many uh reasons for that one is he himself served as a air force officer Um, he was uh the personification of a passionate patriot. And we miss him a great deal. Mister Chairman, thank you again. Good morning to our witnesses. Congratulations on your nominations. I'd like to welcome you and your family members that are here. Mister Hurst, you are nominated to be Under Secretary of Defense Comptroller. You have been performing the duties of this position since August of last year. If confirmed, you would be the first Senate confirmed Comptroller. in this administration. This committee cannot conduct meaningful oversight of more than one trillion dollars of the defense budget without a comptroller who is direct, forthcoming, and accountable to Congress. At this moment of financial uh issues in the department, uh some of the data is um let me say unclear. Mister Hirsch, you testified in April that the cost of the Iran war had reached thirty-one billion dollars, but acknowledge that figure did not include battle damage which is likely to be tens of billions of dollars and i would ask for an updated accounting today we have also received a supplemental request totaling eighty seven point six billion of which sixty seven point one billion is for the department of defense but not all of the funding is directly related to the operational cost of operation epic fury uh i have serious questions about the details of that request and i would appreciate more information. Similarly, the department's FY twenty twenty seven budget requests assumed an additional three hundred and fifty billion dollars in reconciliation funding for barracks, repair, and munitions, and aircraft procurement, among other priorities. In my view, the outlook for another reconciliation bill is very dubious. Mister Hurst, I wanna know the department's plan if that funding does not materialize. I would note that last year's reconciliation bill provided a hundred and fifty billion to the department of defense and the national nuclear security administration but as of earlier this month only sixty seven point five billion has been obligated this committee needs to know whether the department intends to obligate the remainder of that funding before september thirtieth and i expect a firm commitment to receive regular updates on obligation rates going forward finally on dhs reimbursements Since October two thousand twenty five, the Department of Defense has provided more than two billion dollars in support to the Department of Homeland Security however DHS has not reimbursed a dollar of that money and the impact on military training rotations, exercises, and personnel accounts is significant and growing. I would ask for clearance and when you expect that reimbursement to arrive and how the department is mitigating the impacts. In the meantime. Mister Ramelli, you are nominated to be Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment. This position has broad responsibilities for delivering timely and cost-effective capabilities to our warfighters, maintaining those capabilities over many decades, supervising the defense industrial base, and overseeing the modernization of our nuclear forces. It is a demanding job that requires extensive experience in the acu- acquisition field. And I'm concerned that your background, primarily as an intelligence officer in the Navy reserves, and in investment management, does not provide adequate experience for this position. I would like to explain how you plan to fare for this role. The multi-year procurement negotiations currently underway for key munitions are among the most consequential acquisition decisions the department faces. And I'd like to understand your approach to accelerating munitions production, as well as your ideas for incentivizing industry to contribute more of their own resources to delivering these systems in greater numbers at speed. Doctor Mason, you are nominated to be the director of the National Reconnaissance Office. Your background as Assistant Director of National Intelligence for Systems and Resource Analysis should give you important familiarity with NRO's mission. The NRO is an inf- at an inflection point. For most of its history the agency's primary customers were the National Security Agency and the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency. That is changing. The retirement of the Air Force's JSTAR's aircraft has shifted the air and ground moving target indication mission primarily to the Space Force using proliferated satellites and the NRO is now acquiring most of those systems on the Space Force's behalf. This is a significant expansion of the nro s traditional role and it raises real questions about mission focus and institutional identity i want to understand how you would manage the nro s acquisition role while ensuring the space force retains the clan and acquisition authority the law requires and what priorities you have for nro in this rapidly evolving uh evolving environment finally doctor hernandez baquero you are nominated to be assistant of the air force for space acquisition and integration your experience in optical sciences and your experience at the nro will serve you well in this role however i wanna make sure your nomination will not create any perceived conflict of interest due to your previous employment which overlaps much of the same space force isr acquisition portfolio you would now supervise indeed the space force's isr budget is growing from seven billion last year to twelve billion this year nearly all of it in reconciliation funding that is a significant uh area of exposure and i want us to understand how you've divested yourself and the recusal plans you have going forward in addition i'd like to know your thoughts on this committee's long-standing concern about spacex's near monopoly position in launch and proliferated satellite constellations and how you ensure we have competition in these areas Thank you again to our nominees, and I look forward to your testimony. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

29:06 – 29:15

Thank you and that, and with that we will begin our opening statements. Um, we'll go uh left to right. Mister Hurst, your opening statement, sir.

29:17 – 32:46

Chairman Wicker, Ranking Member Reid, and distinguished members of the Armed Services Committee. Let me start by acknowledging the late Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina. Uh, Senator Graham was a patriot. He devoted his life to service and was a tireless advocate for America's service members in our national defense. I pray that God comforts his loved ones during their time of grief. It is an honor to appear before you today as President Trump's nominee to be the Undersecretary of War Cop-Troller and Chief Financial Officer. I'm grateful to the President, Secretary Haeg-Seth, and Deputy Secretary Feinberg for their confidence and for the opportunity to serve. I'm also grateful to my wife, Elizabeth, and our five children, Henry, Charlotte, victoria augustine and george for their love and support beth has learned more about the department's personnel policies and p p b than i suspect she's ever wanted to learn uh but she tells me she enjoys it she's an incredible wife and mother my family and i continue to owe the us military an enormous debt my grandfather sugar attended college on the g i o bill after serving as a marine during the war my father sunny provided my sister and i a middle class upbringing as an air force officer And I was fortunate enough to attend the College of William and Mary on an Army ROTC scholarship. Our military service made each of us better people, better fathers, and better citizens. Over the last two decades, I've been blessed with a great variety of assignments from the JSOC Intelligence Brigade to the Office of the Speaker of the House. I've held an equal variety of positions in this administration. Since January twenty twenty five, I performed the duties of the Undersecretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, the Assistant Secretary for Readiness, and the Under Secretary Koptschuler. I now serve as the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Manpower and Reserve Affairs. These positions are united by a common thread, my desire to improve the department as an institution to better protect the American people. If confirmed as Under Secretary Koptschuler, I will focus on three main priorities. First, the department must pass a clean financial statement audit by twenty twenty eight. We must prove our fiscal responsibility to the American people. As the PTDO Comptroller, I advanced a new audit strategy, helped create the joint task force audit, and hired an incredible audit leadership team. If confirmed, I will continue this work with the talented service comptrollers to drive towards a clean opinion. We will focus our resources on the largest vulnerabilities in our financial statements and apply artificial intelligence to expedite testing as we consolidate systems and apply controls. Second, the department must continue to construct budgets that align with the ongoing evolutions in warfare. and continue expanding our industrial base. As we build sixth generation aircraft, we must also place equivalent bets on affordable mass, autonomous platforms, and EW space and cyber systems. The fielding integration of manned unmanned systems and high and low-cost platforms is critical to our operational success. Third, I will focus on improving financial management systems and processes across the department. The department of War Management is one of the most complex financial enterprises in the world. We must consolidate resource planning tools, establish data standards, and create systems to see resource distributions in real time to improve decision making. If confirmed, I commit to continuing a full court press to achieve a clean financial statement opinion in twenty twenty eight, budgeting for the evolving character of warfare, and modernizing our financial systems and processes. Thank you for the honor of being here today. I look forward to your questions.

32:47 – 32:51

Thank you very much, uh, Mister Hearst, Mister O'Malley, you're recognized.

32:53 – 37:15

Thank you, Mister Chairman, and please allow me to pass along my condolences to the family, friends and colleagues of Senator Lindsey Graham. May the perpetual light shine upon him. Chairman Wicker, Ranking Member Reid, and distinguished members of this committee, good morning. Thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today and for your consideration of my nomination to serve as Deputy Under Secretary of War, for acquisition and sustainment. I'm deeply grateful to President Trump, Vice President Vance and Secretary Exeith for honoring me with this nomination. I also wish to extend my profound thanks to the Honorable Under Secretary Michael Duffy for his leadership, trust and support. It's confirmed it will be the privilege of a lifetime to support him in a role so critical to the department's mandate to rebuild our military and revitalize our defense industrial base. I would not be sitting before you today without the unwavering support of God and my family. Many thanks to my wife, Carrie, and our children. Ella, Shana, Raleigh, Jake, and Grant. I grew up working on my family's tree farm in Wisconsin. On that farm I learned the value of hard work, resilience, and stewardship, principles that have guided my career ever since. To go from planting trees in those fields to sitting before this esteemed committee is a testament to the exceptional promise of this country. It is a trajectory that can truly only happen in America. My career has been defined by a relentless focus on the intersection of national security and technology. For over two decades, I have served as an enlisted intelligence specialist and intelligence officer in the United States Navy Reserve. In that capacity, I have gained firsthand knowledge of the threat confronting our service members, from Iraq and Syria to the European command. Concurrently, as a small business owner, I founded Looking Glass Investments, a firm leveraging big data and machine learning to create complex risk models. Leading this specialized enterprise gave me a deep practical understanding of how advanced data analytics can solve intractable problems. It also taught me the real-world hurdles the innovative vendors face when attempting to navigate complex requirements to deliver cutting-edge solutions. In government, I've had the privilege of serving in key advisory roles. Prior to serving in my current capacity as Senior Advisor to the Undersecretary for Acquisition and Sustainment which I began in March of this year, I served as Special Assistant to the Secretary of War. In that role, I was honored to sport the Secretary's nationwide Arsenal Freedom Tour. We traveled from the shipyards of our coasts, to the aerospace facilities and factories of our heartland. What was most gratifying for me was meeting the men and women of our defense industrial base, the true lifeblood of our national defense. In every engagement I had the opportunity to convey Secretary Haegseth and Secretary Duffy's primary charge of the department, deliver integrated capabilities to our war fighters quickly and at scale. As Secretary Haegseth has established, we are in a war footing. We must restore the warrior ethos, rebuild our military, and re-establish deterrence. We face a highly competitive strategic environment. We are engaged in a high-stakes competition with adversaries who possess both advanced capabilities and the massive industrial base required to produce them. Under President's Trump, uh, under President Trump's leadership, we have the blueprint to meet this challenge. Executive Order one four two six five mandates that we modernize, acquisitions, and spur innovation, recognizing that a robust factory floor is a critical enabler of battlefield success. If confirmed, I will aggressively support the ongoing transition to a dynamic war-fighting acquisition system ensuring we feel technology at a rate that outpaces our adversaries. To achieve this, we must also prioritize the warfighter in all defense contracting, consistent with executive order one four three seventy-two. If confirmed, I will work to ensure our supply chains are highly resilient, and that capital is effectively managed. These executive actions are essential, and their impact is greatly enhanced by the legislative partnership of this committee. I want to thank the Chairman and the Congress for your vital leadership in passing the FORGED Act. The department is already utilizing this critical legislation to recapitalize our manufacturing base secure our supply chains and revitalize the defense workforce. If confirmed, I look forward to working closely with this committee to maximize the authorities' grants about the FORGED Act to continue uh building our industrial strength. If confirmed, I pledge to work closely and transparently with you. I will be fully accountable to the President, the Secretary, the Congress, and the American people. resource our military arsenal with urgency and precision. Thank you for your time and for your consideration of my nomination. I look forward to your questions.

37:15 – 37:18

Thank you, Mr. O'Malley. Doctor Mason, you are recognized.

37:21 – 42:06

Thank you, Mister Chairman, I also wanna begin by expressing my sympathy uh to the members of this committee for the loss of your friend and colleague, Senator Graham. Senator Graham was a stalwart of the for the defense intelligence enterprise and his leadership will be deeply missed. Chairman Wicker, Ranking Member Reid, and distinguished members of the committee, thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today to consider my nomination to be the Director of the National Reconnaissance Office. I want to thank President Trump and Secretary Hexler for their trust and confidence in me to return to government service and fulfill this important national security position. Family is my bedrock, and I'm grateful beyond words for their support, their sacrifice, and unconditional love. First, I want to thank my parents, who instilled in me the importance of being accountable, the value of hard work, and the promise of education. I'm most grateful to my remarkable wife of thirty years, Colleen. She inspires me every day and sets the example of selfless service to our family. Together, we're incredibly proud of our three cur children, John, Joseph, and Caroline, who are just now beginning their own lives based on those new those same values. I was born only a few miles from here in Alexandria, Virginia, and have since been a lifelong resident of Virginia. Growing up, my parents pressed the importance of education with my sister and I, and we became first generation college graduates. For me, applying science to solve hard problems was the passion for learning. This drive resulted in earning a PHD in engineering physics from the University of Virginia which gave me a strong base to begin a career in national security. In my first job after graduate school, I led teams to develop and deploy remote sensors into a global system, linked by satellites, for national security missions. Simply put, I fell in love with the mission and devoted the next thirty-two years of my career, serving it in both industry and government. Over these three decades, I honed my leadership, experience, skills, and abilities to enable me to bring the right leadership at this moment in time, to the National Reconnaissance Office. As President of a Space and Intelligence Business, I led a multi-billion dollar organization with over forty five hundred employees that provided advanced manufacturing, products, services and solution for every phase of space-based missions. I was honored to serve as the first Assistant Director of National Intelligence for Systems and Resource Analysis, driving strategic capability investments, developing intelligence requirements, and conducting independent cost estimates on every major system acquisition. In that role, I gained valuable insight across all intelligence missions from the strategic to the tactical, from counterterrorism to foreign military combat capabilities and everything in between. Today marks an incredibly exciting time for space, not seen since the interval began, the dawn of space intelligence in the nineteen sixties. We are in a space renaissance, where the pace of technology advancement, the speed of innovation, and the promise of the future has drawn unprecedented investments from many sectors. The future of space and how our nation can use it for good seems limitless. Today, the NRO embarks on a new journey to fundamentally change how space-based intelligence is done. The future of space, however, is also contested. Adversaries are in a race to build their own capabilities, including counter space measures, capable of denying our nation's critical space missions. If confirmed, my priorities will focus on elevating NRO's strengths and emphasizing three major areas. The first, accelerate the next-gen space architecture that integrates proliferated and exquisite capabilities, to produce integrated intelligence data at mission speed. The second, enable NRO to push the leading edge of space technology and evade even faster. And the third, ensure enterprise-wide resilience from space vehicles to the ground and everything that connects the agency. These priorities will only be achieved with a vibrant mission-focused workforce and critical strategic partnerships. The NRO workforce is the heartbeat of the organization and demands the full attention of its leadership to attract develop, grow and retain its world-class talent. To deliver success, in a row, strategic partnerships with the military, intelligence agencies and our allies are essential. And we must continue to work closely with an expanding industrial base. All of these relationships must be built with strong communications, transparent processes, and a spirit of problem solving. Chairman Wicker, Ranking Member Reid, and distinguished members of the committee, I conclude these remarks by giving you my commitment that if confirmed, i will bring the very best of my energy and skills in service to the nation to lead the nro with the strength it deserves and the future vision it demands thank you for your time today and i look forward to answering your questions

42:06 – 42:09

thank you doctor mason doctor hernandez beckero

42:11 – 46:59

good morning chairman wicker, ranking member reed and distinguished members of this committee i want to first express my deepest sympathy to all who mourn the recent passing of senator lindsey graham as a fellow air force veteran I am saddened to see him slip the surly bonds of earth and pray his last high flight brings him the joy of touching the face of God. Senator Graham's lifelong dedication to the nation sets a great example for those called to serve the cause of freedom. I thank this committee for the opportunity to appear before you to answer this call. If confirmed, I would be honored to serve as the second Assistant Secretary of the Air Force, for space acquisition and integration. This opportunity is only possible by the grace of God and his divine providence. I humbly thank President Trump, Secretary Hexeth, and Secretary Mink for their trust and confidence in me. I am eternally grateful to my family, friends and colleagues who supported me through thirty-six years of military service in the Air Force and executive leadership in the space industry. Most especially I thank my wife, Kimberly, and my sons, Curtis and Nathan, who deserve recognition for their steadfast love and patriotism. It is this love and patriotism that brings us here today. Our nation faces rapidly growing threats in and from space. Adversaries are increasing their anti-satellite capabilities attempting to deny our freedom of action in space. Additionally, adversaries seek to hold our homeland at risk with advanced space-enabled weapons systems designed to evade our defenses. To counter these threats, we must move quickly to seize the opportunities made possible by the most innovative and productive industry in the world. To do so, if confirmed, I will focus on three priorities, space acquisition reform, mission integration, and the acquisition workforce. I am excited by the acquisition reform the department and this Congress have started. If confirmed, I will further the implementation of these reforms by optimizing work for speed, harnessing commercial innovations, adopting new business models, and focusing on mission outcomes. I have done this as a military officer and as a business leader, and it works. If confirmed, I will codify this approach in acquisition strategies and implement change through good execution of space programs, emphasizing technical expertise, sound risk management, agile processes, and mission-driven operational support. These changes will foster a culture of excellence and innovation critical to mission success. In recent years, progress has been made in making space acquisitions nimbler through the development of smaller satellites and modular software-driven architectures. Such architectures can be fielded faster and at lower unit cost, but they create significant integration challenges. as no single system can perform the full mission. If confirmed, I will drive mission integration by validating capabilities end-to-end early and often, taking advantage of the new mission-aligned Portfolio Acquisition Executives, PAEs. If confirmed, I will also establish key mission threads, such as pace enable, kill chains, to close gaps, increase efficiency, maximize capacity, and ensure interoperability. Finally, if confirmed, I will partner with stakeholders using the authority that Congress established as chair of the Space Acquisition Council to ensure architectural alignment across the space enterprise. None of these efforts are possible without the professionalism of a talented acquisition workforce. In my experience, we lose talent when people are not empowered with decision authority and are shackled by red tape. If confirmed, I will champion initiatives to revitalize and sustain a vibrant workforce. These include promoting a mission-first culture, proactively managing careers, enhancing training and education, and ensuring programs are staffed with the right people and the right job. Finally, if confirmed, I will personally coach and mentor every PAE, modeling the behavior I expect from them. In the end, the acquisition workforce needs to be recognized for the essential war-fighting function they perform. In summary, if confirmed, I commit to advance space acquisition reform, energize mission integration, and revitalize the workforce, working closely with Congress to accelerate delivery of innovative space capabilities to the warfighter. Thank you and I look forward to your questions.

47:00 – 47:54

Uh, thank you, Doctor Hernandez-Piqueiro. Um, in paying tribute to um my friend, Senator Lindsey Graham, Um, you quoted a few words from High Flight by John Gillespie, John Gillespie McGee, Junior. That is um, a special poem to me and to um, many of my fellow service veterans, and I, I thank you for uh, for doing that and commend that work of literature to um, everyone listening. Um, I'll now ask you a series of standard questions this committee poses. to all civilian nominees and please just answer yes or no um have you adhered to applicable laws and regulations governing conflicts of interest

47:55 – 47:56

yes yes yes

47:56 – 48:03

have you assumed any duties or taken any actions that would appear to presume the outcome of the confirmation process

48:03 – 48:03

no no

48:04 – 48:25

exercising our legislative and oversight responsibilities makes it important that this committee, its subcommittees and other appropriate committees of congress, receive testimony, briefings, reports, records and other information from the executive branch on a timely basis. Do you agree, if confirmed, to appear and testify before this committee when requested?

48:26 – 48:26

Yes. Yes.

48:27 – 48:36

Do you agree to provide records, documents and electronic communications in a timely manner when requested by this committee, its subcommittees,

48:35 – 48:36

Yeah. Yes.

48:36 – 48:44

or other appropriate committees to appropriate committees of congress and to consult with the requester

48:39 – 48:40

yeah

48:45 – 48:47

regarding the basis for any good faith delay

48:45 – 48:46

yes

48:48 – 48:50

or denial in providing such records

48:52 – 48:53

yes yes

48:54 – 49:21

will you you know that is a problem that i think um the distinguished ranking member and members of this of the committee would say that we've had to face Uh, so it's good to hear your answer of uh in the affirmative there. Will you ensure that your staff complies with deadlines established by this committee for the production of reports, records and other information, including timely responding to hearing questions for the record?

49:21 – 49:22

Yes. Yes.

49:22 – 49:24

Will you cooperate in providing witnesses and

49:22 – 49:23

Yes.

49:24 – 49:28

briefers in response to congressional requests?

49:28 – 49:29

Yes. Yes.

49:29 – 49:35

Will those witnesses and briefers be protected from reprisal for their testimony or briefings.

49:35 – 49:36

Yes. Yes.

49:36 – 50:14

Thank you very much. Um, and uh, and now um, we um, we we begin with um, um, a round of questions, um, by members of the committee, and um, and, and i'll begin by, um, by asking this to you, mister O'Malley. The, the last NDAIA that we passed uh shifted a burden um toward what we call commercial first. Is that a term that is uh familiar to you, sir?

50:15 – 50:15

Yes, Senator.

50:16 – 51:17

OK. Well, for the benefit of of uh the the Americans listening, um we shifted the burden from if you're gonna buy commercial you have to get approval. Um um to requiring approvals if you're not going to buy commercial so if uh if you're gonna buy a commercial you don't have to have a prior approval anymore um that that means we made commercial procurement the preferred option in contracting however since the executive order was signed pursuant to legislation passed by the congress and signed by the president of the united states the department has actually reduced its commercial spending by nearly one percentage point. That's going in the wrong direction, according to the statute. So how would you make sure commercial first is taken seriously um and and actually is implemented according to statute?

51:19 – 52:05

Uh, yes, Senator. So, as it relates to commercial first, um, I appreciate that data that you just shared. I had not been aware of that. certainly not heading in the right direction um we know from the discussions of commercial first um that we need to work with the services to accelerate the adoption of of uh commercial first solutions uh there are proven commercial tools we know exist um and this goes to the secretary's emphasis on the speed of relevance commercial first is certainly part of that um there's uh an opportunity here to solve readiness bottlenecks um introduce the department to new and innovative companies. Um, uh, and if confirmed, um, I will certainly focus on statute and executive order to make commercial first a priority.

52:06 – 52:19

No, that, thank you, and that should go without saying, but but let's let's be clear. If you're not going to buy commercial items, they've gotta come get approval. You understand that?

52:20 – 52:20

Yes, senator.

52:20 – 52:53

Alright, OK. Well, um, I I very much appreciate that. Um, now, uh, Mister Hurst, I bet you are aware that, that there is, um, some, uh, some, um, dissatisfaction on the part of Congress, uh, about the slow rates of obligation of funds, uh, provided for in reconciliation. Um, uh, you are aware of, of um frustrations and complaints coming from congress in that regard are you not

52:54 – 52:55

yes chairman

52:55 – 53:03

and um so how uh do you propose that that we resolve um that problem and that frustration

53:05 – 53:13

uh well chairman let me first start by saying that i think the the reconciliation bill that this congress passed has been incredibly important for the department of defense

53:13 – 53:37

thank you thank you OK.

53:37 – 53:37

Uh.

53:37 – 53:55

And and so, uh, uh, do I understand your uh, your position to be that, um, the department understands this that you are are moving in the right direction and that you're gonna continue to provide members of this committee and members of the congress with full and free flow of information in that regard.

53:57 – 54:08

Yes, chairman, and before I left the position of PTO comptroller, I was working with the services to create some visualization tools, which should accelerate the gathering of this data, which would make it easier to share with congress.

54:09 – 54:39

Uh, OK, and and then, doctor Mason, we we uh we're running out of time, but um, You you're gonna have to, as I said in my opening statement, balance um expanding commercial partnerships with the need for um for um keeping sensitive technologies uh and capabilities away from our adversaries. Uh, that's a balancing act. Um, how do you intend to meet these demands?

54:42 – 55:27

uh chairman wicker the uh the heart of that that question is really in the next-gen architecture that um is composed of both proliferated and exquisite technology the exquisite being more reference to uh the the national technical means that you reference in that regard uh we have to do both uh and to do both the commercial element of that is essential it is now integrated part of the architecture And so, uh, as you, as you embark in that, uh, the security to protect secrets, whether those are born from how you use the commercial or the exquisite capabilities are really the same and something looking from the outside in, NRO has done a remarkable job of in the past, and I certainly will be committed to the same, um, in the future.

55:28 – 55:45

Well, thank you very much. Um, as you, as the three of you know, I've mentioned those matters in my opening statement. Um, the fact that I asked My questions about them is, it consists of a foot stomp about the importance of those matters. Senator Reid.

55:45 – 56:48

Uh, thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. First um, Secretary Hurst, I must commend your children for their poise and patience, all of which is attributable to your wife, I'm sure. Um, but with that as an introduction, uh, we have had problems getting information from you and from the Department of Defense. For example, in March I asked for information on the course, the operations in Iran, and my staff followed up numerous times. Uh, we received a response on May eleventh from the Assistant Secretary of Legislative Affairs that referred me to your testimony, but during those hearings you didn't provide details and said you'd get back to the committees, and uh then your nomination intervened. So, uh, our staffs have been asking consistently for this information and uh i don't think we're alone in being uh frustrated if confirmed you commit to respond rapidly to my existing inquiries and also additional inquiries going forward

56:50 – 57:00

uh mister ranking member i'm a former congressional staffer i i believe in congress's oversight role and if confirmed i will work with this committee to provide the appropriate data and answer your rfis

57:01 – 57:39

i can't emphasize enough and you know from your position if we don't know what the is going on then we're not in a position to make judicious decisions so it's absolutely essential and uh this is uh been a consistent hallmark i think of the department uh not giving us the information we're legally entitled to in a timely fashion so thank you uh mister mali uh what do you see as the main levers that DOD can use to get industry industry to invest more of its own money in expanding production and self-funded research and development

57:43 – 58:27

uh mr. ranking member as an incentive to industry to increase their r and d spending um i certainly believe the multi-year procurement um authority that this committee in congress has given has been very helpful and will continue to be helpful r and d and on if if it's ok to say i'd like to add facilitation cost as well um this has been a powerful lever to drive down unit cost um expand industrial capability um and and work on securing our supply chains um it gives the defense industrial base stability um and predictability so they can they can continue to make those investments it's a long-term demand signal for them um and it also allows suppliers to make larger capital commitments uh throughout the process

58:27 – 58:41

um one of the question is that uh there is a debate about defense contractors stock buybacks particularly in situations where they're not meeting budget or and cost uh what's your opinion on that

58:42 – 59:16

um mr. ranking member um i i certainly believe that taxpayer dollars should be used to deliver combat capability um not for financial engineering um and uh as it relates to this the department needs to be a tougher customer co- contractors should not be prioritizing stock buybacks or bonuses um and this is an accountability question and we need to get up get after that up front uh the president expects capability to be delivered to the war fighter um fast and at better cost and if confirmed this will certainly be a priority

59:16 – 59:49

thank you doctor mason uh we're in a transition as you indicated in your testimony uh the jstosh used to be the uh the most significant air and ground movement target indicator system we have now that's moving into space space force has operational command and control but nro is doing a great deal uh in terms of acquisition of the the space the satellites etcetera uh are you worried that nro might become too operationally focused on near term space force requirements

59:51 – 59:55

Ranking member Reid, uh first of all thank you for taking the time to visit, I appreciate that very much.

59:55 – 59:55

Yes sir.

59:56 – 1:01:04

Um let me start by saying that the relationship, the coordination between the United States Space Force and the NRO is essential. It's the cornerstone for space dominance for the for for the nation. Uh at the same time, the roles and responsibilities are quite clear. Space force organized, trained, and equipped, NRO provides space-based intelligence for the IC as well as as the warfighter. when i look at uh from the outside in uh what has occurred in terms of the moving target indicator first ground then airborne i view it as actually a uh a a lesson in good government uh in terms of the gmti the ground mti uh that was a case where uh the department uh took some existing technology that was being developed by the nro and then instead of starting a brand new program adapted that technology which would have been far cheaper and we certainly uh uh got it on orbit a lot quicker. amti as i understand it will take us to the next step that's actually being procured by the space force on a recent uh announcement they made so to me this is a good progression of good government decision in terms of taking strengths and moving them into uh areas where they should be done uh by the military.

1:01:04 – 1:01:17

thank you my time's expired uh doctor herández vacarro thank you uh and i look forward to uh working with you i will also If there are questions, I will just submit them for the record. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

1:01:17 – 1:01:23

Thank you. I do anticipate there'll be a a number of questions for the record. Senator Fischer.

1:01:24 – 1:01:48

Thank you, Mister Chairman, and thank all of you for being here today and for your willingness to continue to serve your country uh if confirmed in these new nominations uh Doctor Mason, are there opportunities for increased collaboration between intelligence and military space programs? And if so, can you tell us one or two that you may have thought of?

1:01:50 – 1:02:40

Cer- certainly. First of all, uh, Senator S- Fisher, uh, I also thank you for the time we spent. I appreciate you making, making that. I found it very valuable. Uh, yes, Senator, I, I think the coordination and collaboration between the warfighter and the intelligence community is essential, and it makes us o- only stronger. Uh, to give you an example in terms of a space base, um, um, program that was done in coordination with the space force and the nro that's public uh a program called silent barker which is really for space situational awareness and again it it follows the same pattern as uh as the moving target indicator starting with some strengths that the nro had in terms of developing these type of spacecraft and instead of developing a whole new system applying resources that were very clear which were coming from the department versus which were

1:02:52 – 1:03:40

i think it's extremely important um that that work continue with with space force to insure that we have that smooth transition of these new capabilities to our war fighters so thank you for that uh decade we've had uh a pretty big revolution in commercial space imagery capabilities and nro has been able to take advantage of that through various contracts uh it's been especially helpful to our combatant commanders i understand nro has finite resources but i would caution against deprioritizing these programs in future budget requests If confirmed, will you commit to working with me and this committee on addressing this issue?

1:03:41 – 1:03:42

Uh, yes, Senator, I will, and

1:03:44 – 1:04:36

Thank you. We spoke about that some in our conversation in my office and um, I think it's extremely important that we address it in the future. Uh, Doctor Hernandez, uh, Beccaro, I appreciated your influence on acquisition reform in your opening statement, but transformative Reforms require more than updating the statutes and regulations that govern the department's acquisition processes. The underlying acquisition culture needs to change as well, so that contracting officers are encouraged to really use uh those new authorities that they've been given. Which acquisition programs concern you the most? As you look at that from a cost schedule, or uh even a technical risk perspective.

1:04:38 – 1:05:36

Senator, thank you uh for that, and absolutely I c- hundred percent agree with you that uh we cannot just rely on statutes and policy documents to really change the culture. We need the people to exercise a new way of doing business every day. Uh, which is why I'm excited about the reorganization around the portfolio acquisition executives, where they will now be resourced with cross-functional teams and have authority over those teams to employ the right contract strategies across all programs. Uh, I'm mostly concerned about our legacy acquisitions that have been ongoing for a number of years. Uh, and if confirmed, one of the first things I'll do is review the progress, uh, what's remaining to be done in those legacy acquisitions. Uh, those are the ones that are gonna be encumbered the most because they weren't born with the new digital engineering techniques. They weren't born, uh, with the intent to integrate into these hybrid architectures. And so that would be the the area that I would be most concerned about.

1:05:37 – 1:06:40

Yeah, there's, um, I think, a a lot of room to improve that accountability in those major acquisition programs. Um, so I hope that we will see some improvement, um, in the delays that we experience. Although I am a proponent of, uh, also taking managed risks, I'd say. in order that we can move faster. We have to move faster. Uh, Mister Hurst, I also appreciated our discussion last month on the department's path to achieve a clean audit by the statutory deadline of twenty twenty eight. I was encouraged by your remarks. Uh, I tend to think you're, uh, overly optimistic, uh, with them. We haven't, we haven't seen, uh, a lot of improvement there. I But I think you might be the guy to get it. Are there areas in which congressional action is needed to strengthen, um, those efforts by the department to get that audit done?

1:06:41 – 1:07:33

Well, Senator, thank you for the question. Uh, I'm optimistic because with a problem this big you have to be. That's the only way you're gonna get after it. Um, the thing we need most is we need to change our accounting rules to reflect the Department of War's mission. We have fortune five hundred accounting standards for a war fighting organization. And I'll give you a quick example. As part of our audit, we have to validate the value of all of our assets on our books to include things like the USS Constitution a two hundred war you know war old warship in Massachusetts. And we have to account for every single modification we've made to that vessel in the evaluation and prove that to our auditors if they decide to sample that. That's simply not helpful for our war fighting mission. We need to know where our equipment is, its condition, a general statement of its value, But having to do the same kind of estimate we would for any kind of other, you know, fourteen five hundred company evaluation is not very helpful. And Congress could help us with that.

1:07:34 – 1:07:35

Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

1:07:36 – 1:07:45

A very good initial answer to that, um, that problem. Thank you very much to both of you. Senator Shahin, you are recognized.

1:07:46 – 1:08:56

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Good morning. Um, congratulations to each of you on your nominations and thank you for your willingness to continue to serve the country. Um, Secretary Hurst, yesterday President Trump announced that he wanted to put a twenty percent fee on cargo going through the Strait of Formuse and he gave us his rationale that we need help if we're gonna police uh operations in the Straits that we need help paying for the cost of those operations. Now, the estimates that I've seen so far suggest that that would result in a fifteen dollar increase on a barrel of oil. Um, and that's after yesterday's highest jump in gas prices in six years in the United States. Last month, Secretary Rubio was asked about this and he said that such fees would violate international law. We've heard both the Vice President and Secretary Hegseth, who also confirmed that this was not something that we were considering or should be doing. So what is the position of the department on tolling commercial vehicles through this vessels through the Strait of Hormuz?

1:08:58 – 1:09:07

Senator, I appreciate the question, but this just falls well outside my expertise or knowledge. Um, so, um, we can take that for the record for the department, uh, but I can't give you an answer today.

1:09:08 – 1:09:47

Well, given that the issue that's cited there is the cost of the operations in Iran, it seems to me that that's something that you ought to be intimately involved with if you're confirmed for this position because it's gonna have a huge impact not just on the amount of money that we're paying but also on how we're being viewed by the rest of the world. As secretary Rubio has said, this would be a violation of international law. So I hope if you're confirmed that you will find out what the department is thinking about this issue. Do I have a commitment that you will do that?

1:09:47 – 1:09:50

Yes, ma'am. If confirmed, I will uh dig into this issue.

1:09:50 – 1:11:05

Thank you. Mister O'Malley, if confirmed, you'll oversee the office responsible for installations and environment, including PFAS remediation. The FY twenty-six NDAA required the department to provide alternative water in communities around military bases with contamination above state and federal maximum contaminant levels for PFAS. But I'm hearing from residents in New Hampshire that a year after this was put into effect, it has still not been implemented for the former Pease Air Force Base. Um, despite the fact that the Air Force has, I think most people would agree, been very supportive of cleaning up PFAS in uh the Portsmouth area around Pease and um so it's disappointing to see that they are not um going along with what's been determined to be practice. So, if confirmed, will you commit to continuing DOD's existing practice of conducting PFAS cleanup at military installations and communities affected by DOD releases of PFAS? Um, and check into this issue why our residents in New Hampshire are not, um, having their water, um, being dealt with.

1:11:06 – 1:11:06

Yes, Senator, I will.

1:11:07 – 1:11:54

Thank you. Um, also, for you, Mister O'Malley, Um, I recently came back from the NATO summit with a number, Senator Rounds and a num- a number of members of the Senate. And while at that summit, the President announced that he would look into an agreement with Ukraine on data sharing for drone procurement. As you know, um, we have a lot of lessons that we can learn from the Ukrainians with respect to, uh, drone technology. The delegation at the summit in Ankara heard that this agreement currently being held up by the Pentagon. So it confirmed, will you commit to looking into this and reporting back to this committee about what the hold-up is and when it's gonna move forward?

1:11:55 – 1:11:55

Yes, Senator, I will.

1:11:56 – 1:12:28

Thank you. Um, Doctor Mason, the NDAA passed out of this committee includes a provision to require intelligent sharing with the Ukrainian armed forces and Russian-occupied territories. It builds on last year's provision that required notifications of any stop to this intelligent sharing. Can you talk about why this continued intelligent sharing with the Ukrainian armed forces is important, and why it would be helpful for us to continue this effort?

1:12:30 – 1:13:19

Senator Shahin, in in terms of the the scope and the and the mission of the NRO, um, uh, the focus that I would have, is ensuring that the data collected is accurate and uh and and relevant and and and timely. In terms of information sharing with either allies or uh or other uh other nations, um the NRO director has to rely on agencies like the functional manager of NGA in this case, if it's if it's emi- imagery. And so uh I would commit to uh underst- uh to taking that on board to make sure that we supply the NRO uh, NGA what's needed in terms of satisfying those requirements from a shareability standpoint. I will also say that from a commercial standpoint, this is one of the benefits of commercial imagery, that it's easily, more easily shareable to satisfy a number of intelligence missions as well as our partners.

1:13:20 – 1:13:22

Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

1:13:21 – 1:13:24

Thank you, Senator Shaheen. Senator Rounds, you are recognized.

1:13:26 – 1:15:22

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Um, first let me just thank all of you for your service to our country. Uh, uh, Mr. O'Malley, I'm gonna ask you a question that I normally wouldn't ask. uh except for the fact that i think it's been brought up uh that that specifically uh it's technical in nature but it's one that i think we wanna bring attention to the portable intermittent fault detector or piffid um this is an aircraft wiring tester achieved authority to operate on the f thirty five program in twenty twenty over the last six years the piffid has been used only to respond to action requests and have resolved over ninety aircraft wiring problems including returning grounded aircraft to operational status according to the department of war and gao data the pifid has increased readiness by more than fifty percent on every aircraft wiring system that it has been applied to a gao report identified that three out of four f-thirty-fives are not mission capable. As it pertains to the F thirty five aircraft wiring, intermittent faults and no fault found tests, results are of significant concern to this air committee due to there being three variants of this aircraft with forty seven different wiring configurations. If confirmed, will you work with me and the committee to determine why the PIFAD has not been fully adopted, and industrialize as a standard piece of support equipment across the F-thirty-five program, and to establish a deadline for the adoption and deployment of the PfID to F-thirty-five maintainers to improve the readiness and sustainability of this critical weapons platform and to facilitate its deployment. Like I say, technical in nature, but pretty important.

1:15:19 – 1:15:42

Uh Uh, yes, Senator, and uh, thank you for being with me to discuss three D printing and the uh, South Coast School of Minds. I appreciated our time. Um, if confirmed, I would welcome the opportunity to work with you on this issue, uh, and this committee, uh, and the joint program office to examine specific engineering, funding, and bureaucratic barriers that have limited, um, PIFID across the F- thirty-five program.

1:15:43 – 1:16:59

This has been recommended not just by the committee, but, uh, by the Pentagon in general. It needs to be implemented. Um, the supplemental sent to Congress includes much needed funding to replenish munitions and cover operational costs. It does not include a request for military construction funds. While the department should review its CENTCOM footprint and possibly reposture for the current threat, I am concerned that not seeking military construction in the supplemental will drive the cost of rebuilding CENTCOM's infrastructure and presence into future base budget requests. that will already be crowded with military construction requirements to support the bed-down of the b-twenty-one, the f-forty-seven, sentinel and other emerging weapons systems for mister hearst um i understand the battle assessments take time as well as figuring out what our partners will pay for and what we will pay for but what are your thoughts on emergency appropriations that provide time for a regional posture review and funds to rebuild our presence, balanced with reporting and consultation, the Congress consultation with the Congress before the department moves out.

1:17:02 – 1:17:14

Senator, let me come back to you after I've given that some thought. Um, you know, this conflict could greatly change our posture in the region, and I think that's something that has to be taken to account. But if you don't mind, I'll come back to you later on.

1:17:14 – 1:17:20

That's fair. Well, matter of fact, if you'd like, I'll put it into a, into a, a question for the record for you.

1:17:20 – 1:17:21

Let's do that.

1:17:21 – 1:17:54

Alright, thank you. Um. Mister Hurst, can you discuss uh some of the internal bureaucratic hurdles that prevent the department from rapidly allocating and executing congressionally appropriated funds? Are there any resources or authorities Congress could provide that would help mitigate those issues? And lastly, in twenty twenty five, the department advocated flexible funding for all software programs. Mister Hurst, do you still believe the department needs this flexible authority for software and similar digital tools and systems?

1:17:56 – 1:18:55

Well, Senator Rounds, I really enjoyed talking about this issue with you in your office. Um, so as many of you know, it takes us a very long time to get funds from appropriation to the actual executing program office or unit, sometimes that's two or three months inside the department. The main reason for that is we don't have a centralized electronic funds disbursement system in fact when Coptriller initially gets we get that via pdf. And then we provide a pdf to the services. That's obviously not acceptable in the twenty first century, and so before I left performing the duties of Comptroller, I put together a tiger team to get after this issue. I would like to see us get funds dispersed across the department within one or two weeks at the most. I will be working towards that. Uh, sir, you mentioned funding flexibility, uh, the PPB commission's been very clear on that, the department probably needs more flexibility in a lot of areas, including software. Uh, but in order to do that properly, we have to make sure we have the appropriate mechanisms to communicate and be transparent with Congress and so that's a conversation I'd like to continue to have with you, if confirmed.

1:18:56 – 1:18:56

Thank you.

1:18:56 – 1:18:57

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

1:18:59 – 1:19:01

Thank you, Senator Rounds. Senator Gillibrand.

1:19:02 – 1:20:57

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Uh, Secretary Hearst, thank you for your service. Uh, you have an incredible career, and I want to thank you and your family for continuing to dedicate your time and talent to the defense of this country. It's a significant undertaking. Um, you have a very important job as controller. Uh, your job fundamentally is gonna be about transparency and accountability. And, uh, one of the burdens I think of this job you're going to have right now is that the American people are very concerned about the lack of transparency and accountability when it comes to this war. From their perspective, it's an unauthorized, illegal, unwanted war. Um, the amount of spending is astronomical. I think you've just uh recently given us the sixty seven billion dollar number. If they had a choice, they'd rather sixty seven billion dollars fund Medicaid in their health care. They'd rather have sixty seven billion dollars fund to get the cost of groceries down, to get the cost of fuel down. And with the constant um uh problems in the Strait of Hormuz, and the continuing and the escalating of this war, people are very distressed about the cost of uh fueling their cars fueling their homes the cost of diesel for truck drivers and the cost it's having on everything because of that increase so transparency is something that we care very much about and in your budget it is not clear um especially for the supplemental what is creating these enormous costs you're asking for an additional three hundred fifty billion dollars which to new yorkers is gonna seem like a slush fund to them so it's unclear Are these costs to pay for the destruction because of the war to our bases and operations abroad? Is this cost because of um the increase in cost to our naval navy ships because they were extended at sea? Are these costs because of wasteful domestic deployments of DOD personnel?

1:21:00 – 1:21:35

Senator, again, thanks for the question. Uh, the sixty seven billion dollar supplemental I wasn't involved in in the generation of that because I'm not in the position of Comptroller. Um, but let me say this. The department needs a generational investment. It's a defense, right? The Arleigh Burke class destroyer, the first one was commissioned in nineteen eighty five, forty years ago. It's still the mainstay of our surface fleet. The Air Force is planning to fly the KC one thirty five until potentially the twenty seventies. We have to update our platforms. We have to buy affordable masks. We have to procure autonomous warfare platforms and integrate them into the force.

1:21:36 – 1:21:39

Well, let's talk, let's talk about autonomous, um, platforms.

1:21:36 – 1:21:36

We have

1:21:39 – 1:22:31

I know that you've, uh, authored, um, uh, ev- at least articles or books, I'm not sure, on AI as well as autonomous s- systems. And I'm highly concerned about, uh, the bombing of a school in Iran, a girl's school. Um, that bombing has been deeply upsetting to New Yorkers. A hundred and twenty children were killed, and we still don't have a report on that. Again, transparency and accountability. It is essential that this department give this Congress the report of how that target was selected. Why more recent data and information showing that it was clearly a girl's school, and no longer part of the military base that was next door. Have you been given the report on how that targeting was made and whether AI systems were used.

1:22:33 – 1:22:38

Senator, I have not seen that report. I I regret the loss of any civilian life in any conflict.

1:22:39 – 1:23:32

I'm also deeply concerned that as we wrote this last NDAA, there was pushback by the department on making sure that there's a human in the loop. Um, the the language that they f- they agreed to was, um, appropriate human oversight. That is obviously not the same thing as human in the loop. And so when we are choosing targets, I understand when it comes to defense, having autonomous quick systems to protect men and women on the battlefield, protect our assets, protect our infrastructure is essential, and having AI enhanced capabilities to defend is extremely important. But I'm highly concerned that before we push send on a missile, that is gonna target perhaps a girl's school, because the targeting was done so poorly and the analysis wasn't done accurately, that we have a human in the loop. What is your view on that?

1:23:34 – 1:23:52

Well, Senator, I would say I think it's very important for the department to engage with the committee and talk about how it's using AI um and I think, you know, as somebody who worked on Project Maven and was a Target Officer in his career, I think AI has the potential to actually improve the safety um for civilians in warfare. It's all about how we implement it, but we owe you that conversation.

1:23:53 – 1:23:59

Absolutely, and we are waiting for that report. And, Mister Chairman, for the record, I hope we receive that report soon.

1:23:59 – 1:24:03

Uh, thank you very much, Senator Gilbrand. Senator Ernst.

1:24:03 – 1:25:48

Yes, thank you, Mister Chair, and I want to start by saying thank you, Mister Chairman, and to our ranking member as well, for recognizing our, uh, dear colleague, uh, Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina. I've looked across the the dais and, uh, that incredible gentleman was a friend, I think, to all of us on this committee, and he most certainly was a friend to our department of war. Um, so thank you for that and thank you for remembering him. Um, I won't be able to get to all of you today, um, but I do hope that all of you are committed, uh, to delivering results and specifically faster fielding of capabilities for our war fighter, uh, as we go through this next fiscal year. Um, budgeting is important. Our space capabilities and absolutely, um, Mister Hearst, we're gonna focus very heavily on clear accountability for the taxpayers and the war fighters. Um, so I will start with you, secretary. Uh, the fiscal year twenty-seven budget request was, uh, actually, uh, built before we started engaging in epic fury, before we had an oil blockade on Cuba. Um, so we have these, uh, um, issues that are pressing upon our department. Uh, and yet we're trying to manage those, uh, ongoing operations with the new operations that we have in the Middle East and the Caribbean. Um, so, uh, with the ongoing operations, we're doing modernization, we're developing munitions, um, we're, you know, replenishing, uh, systems that have been destroyed. So, uh, Secretary, is the fiscal year twenty-seven budget sufficient to cover these demands? Very simple.

1:25:50 – 1:25:55

Senator, I believe the FY twenty-seven budget request from the Department of War is sufficient to cover those demands.

1:25:55 – 1:26:09

Thank you. And is money currently being shifted from other priorities? Are we managing that money and taking from one area to cover down on some of those additional operations?

1:26:11 – 1:26:23

Um, Senator, again, I'm avoid a presuming confirmation, uh, so I'm not involved in the fiscal management of the department at this time. But I would say historically whenever there are contingency operations, the department makes trade-offs so then it's current year budget.

1:26:23 – 1:27:36

Mm-hmm. So I wou- I would argue that as we're moving forward, most certainly I'm sure money has been shifted and we need to replenish where we can. So I do hope that this committee and others in the Senate are able to come together and find a way forward to reinforce our department of war. Um, moving on to the audit, it's been brought up a number of times. The department is committed by the year twenty twenty eight to complete a uh clean audit. And we found a lot of material weaknesses in the fiscal year twenty five audit. I think there were twenty six of those weaknesses identified. And we still have taxpayers being asked to fund one and a half trillion dollars for the defense of our nation. Um, so what specifically, and this is coming from an old auditor, I started my elected career as a an auditor, mind you, for a very small rural county in Iowa, but as an auditor. So what specifically has changed in your approach to completing a clean audit? And what milestones do you assess you can meet at the one year mark?

1:27:38 – 1:28:31

senator the fundamental change in our approach is this previously we were pursuing over twenty five different opinions to get to the dow audit we're boiling the ocean slowly now what we're doing is we're pursuing a dow consolidated audit we're raising our materiality and we're focused on the biggest liabilities in our balance sheet we're gonna focus our resources against those the other thing we're doing that's compelling is we're hiring an ipa the ig is hiring an ipa to run the audit And this IPA is gonna have access to advanced tools and AI systems that will help them incorporate the data, look at it faster than the IG staff can. We're also doing that on our side, we're applying artificial intelligence. The Marine Corps, which has had a clean opinion for three years in a row, has many material weaknesses left. They got their opinion by substantive testing. We can do the same thing inside DOW with the use of artificial intelligence in the leveraging of resources.

1:28:31 – 1:29:50

No, I appreciate that. forward to working with you over the next six months in my remaining time here to make sure that you are achieving that clean audit um i do wanna uh recognize as well you do bring up the uss constitution and that's an interesting argument that maybe we need to have it is still an active naval vessel um so it does belong to the navy and it does have to be accounted for um but at the same time uh you bring up an interesting point where it's not uh, really focusing on an active mission for our war fighters. And perhaps as we identify issue areas such as the USS Constitution, and I'm not saying please, I know the Navy is just gonna come after me for this, but perhaps in the future we need to have those conversations about what remains in the inventory of uh the United States Department of War or what maybe gets shifted to um, other entities like the Smithsonian. where it could be supported by federal dollars and private donors. Um, again, the Navy will come after me for this, but, but it is an interesting conversation. I'm not supporting or not supporting, um, but certainly you do bring up an interesting point. We wanna make sure that our taxpayer dollars are going specifically for the white war fighters. So, uh, thank you all very much. Thank you, Mister Chair.

1:29:51 – 1:29:59

Thank you, Senator Arntz. I I wonder to what extent that is a um, um, rather rare example or um

1:29:59 – 1:29:59

it's rare

1:29:59 – 1:30:10

something that is writ large but um i'm i appreciate your input in that regard and uh thank you for your service uh senator hirono is next

1:30:10 – 1:30:34

thank you mr. chairman i asked the following two questions of all nominees before any of the committees on which i said to ensure the fitness deserves so i'd like the responses starting from mr. hearst and then we'll go down the line Since you became a legal adult, have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors or committed any verbal or physical harassment or assault of a sexual nature?

1:30:34 – 1:30:36

No. No, Senator.

1:30:37 – 1:30:37

No.

1:30:37 – 1:30:38

No.

1:30:40 – 1:30:45

Have you ever faced discipline or entered into a settlement related to this kind of conduct?

1:30:45 – 1:30:46

No, Senator.

1:30:47 – 1:30:48

No, Senator.

1:30:48 – 1:30:49

No.

1:30:49 – 1:30:49

No.

1:30:51 – 1:31:32

This is for uh mister hurst. Um, in April you testified that Operation Epic Fuhrer, better known as the warning rod, had cost approximately twenty nine billion dollars largely driven by munitions, operations and maintenance expenditures. More recently, independent assessments suggest the true cost is already over one hundred billion, when damaged aircraft, bases and other war-related expenses are what is the department's current estimate of the total the total cost of operation epic epic ferry including the other expenses i mentioned

1:31:35 – 1:31:50

senator during my testimony before this committee i conveyed the estimate compiled by the military officers of the joint staff in the civilian coptraler workforce unmodified um i don't have an updated estimate ma'am because i haven't been in the position of coptraler but if confirmed i'm happy to work with you to get that answer

1:31:51 – 1:32:55

well well all indications are that there are no uh there's no end in sight of the cost of this war and i think that this committee and the american people need to be apprised on a regular basis what is happening with this war because prices keep going up with all of the other uh items that the our families have to pay for and uh i'd ask you how uh how do you expect that these costs are being absorbed by the services and how are you assessing or how will you assess the uh impact that these uh this additional spending has had on readiness. At some point the cost of this war is going to impact readiness, i.e. we have ships in the Middle East, they've been there for months, when they uh they they need to be um um they need to be prepared, they need to um our shipyards have to have to ready them for the next deployment so how uh is all of this gonna happen are you gonna be responsible for coordinating some of this

1:32:58 – 1:33:12

senator if confirmed i would be responsible for helping the services solve current year execution problems um again i'm i don't know what the current state is because i'm not performing the duties of cop trailer but if confirmed i'd be happy to help work to get those answers for you

1:33:12 – 1:34:34

i hope that uh mister chairman that as we go along that all of our nominees who are not currently in their positions or if they are they're in an acting position then they can be called back to our committee so they can give us the appropriate information that we are requesting it is very frustrating to ask them what the costs are etcetera and the response is that we're not there yet and so we can't tell you so uh in your opening statement mister hearst you mentioned uh that your first priority is to prove the fiscal responsibility of the department to the american people. Fiscal responsibility at the same time uh the uh DOD obligated more than two billion in non-reimbursed funds and over two billion in reimbursable funds, which still hasn't been paid to the department of homeland security. And so as part of uh fiscal responsibility, do you uh intend to get this money back from DHS and do you anticipate giving uh more money reimbursable or not to DHS because they have their own huge pot of money that this congress just appropriated without any guardrails on their activity and they are in the process of killing more people. Did you get the money back? Do you intend to get the money back from DHS?

1:34:35 – 1:34:49

Senator, uh when I was performing the dues of the cop trial I signed a memorandum of agreement uh with dhs for reimbursement and i held several meetings with dhs leadership about reimbursement if confirmed i will continue to pursue reimbursement for the department

1:34:48 – 1:34:56

do you know if they reimburse the billions that the dod already provided to dhs

1:34:56 – 1:35:00

and my current position as assistant secretary of the army for man power and reserve affairs i i don't know

1:35:02 – 1:35:25

again mr. chairman uh this is pretty frustrating so this goes to the question i was uh you uh mister her about ship maintenance and i should ask mister o'malley you know what i'm gonna obviously i'm gonna need to submit this question for the record but i have concerns about ship maintenance as our ships are deployed for much longer uh deployments on the especially in the middle east thank you mister chairman

1:35:25 – 1:36:08

um thank you sir and and your um comment is noted uh i would um remind you that um, it, it is improper for any nominee to, um, assume any duties or take any actions that would appear to presume the outcome of the confirmation process. And, uh, so that, um, that's a question that we always ask and, and we very much mean it. So, there is, uh, a balance there and I can appreciate your, um, uh, your, your, uh, opinion in that regard. We now move to Senator Scott.

1:36:09 – 1:36:35

Thank you, Mister Chairman, first off uh thank each of you for um being willing to serve, congratulations on your nominations. So uh Secretary Hurst let me start with you. I just I just my question was all gonna be or the beginning for you was gonna be about what um Senator Ernst brought up to how do we get these audits done, I mean it doesn't it makes no sense, I mean I'm a business guy, I couldn't erase a dime um if I uh if I couldn't do audits. So, do you feel comfortable that this is gonna get done?

1:36:37 – 1:36:46

Senator, I'm confident we can do it. I have a lot of faith in the comptroller workforce and the service comptrollers. It is a tremendous effort. It will take a new approach.

1:36:47 – 1:37:34

OK, thanks. Mr. O'Malley, um, com- the government of Communist China has decided to be our enemy. Um, uh, what I've never understood, I've been up here seven and a half years, is why our military continues to be dependent on Communist China for anything. um when they come up here we're buying our drones from them um even today we're still we still buy computers and all sorts of tvs all sorts of stuff that we use we're we're completely dependent on them for generic drugs uh the um uh which they could they could stop giving to us at any moment so what's your strategy to stop buying uh all this stuff from communist china who i mean we're spending a lot of this money in the military because they wanna be our enemy and then we're buying stuff from them makes no sense to me and it doesn't seem like it's the change is happening very fast.

1:37:35 – 1:38:09

Uh yes, Senator, uh China is clearly our number one adversary. Um the um as it relates to the supply chain, uh we need to do a better job of illuminating the supply chain um and systematically identifying um targeting and decoupling from China. Um I think we need to continue to deploy the advanced supply chain tools that we've been working with. to gain uh you know multi-tier visibility with with no choke points um and of course we also need to reassure these capabilities um as quickly as possible and it will certainly be a focus if confirmed

1:38:10 – 1:38:19

so is it gonna happen i mean everybody you know in the last seven years everybody comes up and says yep we're gonna do this but is somebody gonna do it

1:38:21 – 1:38:22

was so senator

1:38:22 – 1:38:24

it's not happening i mean as far as i can tell

1:38:25 – 1:38:43

so the department recently release the twelve sixty h list um about the technology of chinese military um identifying isolating adversarial military influence um that strikes me as a first a good first step and to continuing to uh emphasize uh decoupling from china

1:38:44 – 1:39:01

so um dr. hernandez beckero so the space uh space coast is a big deal in florida right uh i think it's probably we've got the best commercial space capabilities and the best skilled workforce probably in the world uh, for space launch uh there. Can you talk about why this is important to uh the Department of War?

1:39:03 – 1:39:41

Yes, Senator, hailing from the great state of Florida and having spent my time uh at the uh space coast, I absolutely agree with you, it's essential. Uh, our launch capacity is the best in the world and we need to continue to maintain it, uh, and increase it. Uh, we need more capacity from our launch uh facilities in order to fill out the hybrid architectures, we're generating uh and developing more satellites than ever, uh that's seen in the proliferated architectures that we're deploying, and that puts a lot of demand on the on the spaceports, so it's absolutely essential that we maintain and we grow that capacity.

1:39:41 – 1:39:41

Right.

1:39:41 – 1:39:45

And if confirmed, I will work with department stakeholders to ensure that we do that.

1:39:45 – 1:39:48

Alright. Thank each of you for um your commitment.

1:39:53 – 1:39:56

Thank you very much, Senator Scott. Senator King.

1:39:58 – 1:40:24

Mister Hurst, I'm unpersuaded by your professions of ignorance about the cost of the war. You were the acting Comtroll, or Chief Financial Officer, of the Department of Defense since, uh, until May twentieth. That's about seven weeks ago. And to sit here today and say, well, I don't really know and I'm not in the position, come on, you had to know this question was gonna come up at this hearing today. How much has the Iran war cost the american people

1:40:26 – 1:40:35

senator king i'm will give you the same answer i gave you during the posture hearing that it was twenty nine billion at the time i left the position uh if confirmed i'm gonna work for this

1:40:35 – 1:40:40

does that twenty nine billion include damage to facilities and and uh assets in the region

1:40:41 – 1:41:01

no no senator um that estimate did not include military construction again we don't know what the posture is gonna be there are lessons learned from military construction from this conflict I would say one of these is that the United States needs to invest more in uh hardened and deeply buried facilities, uh particularly in these kinds of areas, uh but it doesn't reflect MilKom.

1:41:01 – 1:41:13

So that's not part of the estimate. What the the estimate that you gave of twenty nine billion was simply uh muni- essentially munitions and and expenditures in direct result of the of the conflict.

1:41:14 – 1:41:24

Senator, yeah, I would characterize that estimate as largely munitions, from memory it was over twenty billion dollars in munitions and the most, the rest of that operational cost whether that's fuel

1:41:24 – 1:41:29

in preparing for this hearing you didn't do any you didn't ask any questions about updating that that number

1:41:29 – 1:41:34

i i felt it would be inappropriate to do so because that's not in my current role in the department

1:41:35 – 1:42:14

well uh i i think it's it's very frustrating to the american people that we we can't get a a straight answer on what this war is costing uh not to mention what it's costing and has cost to the american people at the at the gas pump and in other costs uh Mr. O'Malley, um, on acquisition, one thing that I think is important today, uh, more than perhaps in the past, is buying the intellectual property when we buy a platform, so that we can maintain and build parts, every, every depot, every aircraft hangar, every ship should have a, a three D printer. We shouldn't have to go back to the manufacturer. Do you agree?

1:42:16 – 1:42:49

Uh, yes, Senator, I, I do agree that, um, obtaining the intellectual property upfront is should be a focus of the department as we're negotiating agreements um i do think there's a balance here we need to let industry know that we have the ability to protect their ip after it's transferred to us uh but i will um i i'm thinking about what the cno testified recently uh where he said that the inability to perform organic repairs due to lack of technical data is inexcusable um i certainly support that and um I think intellectual property is.

1:42:48 – 1:43:07

I I I appreciate that. And then, to reiterate the point, right to repair is an important part of our responsibility and something that we should ensure that this is an enormous cost center. And also, in a time of conflict, it's it's a time issue, is it not?

1:43:08 – 1:43:30

Yes, Senator, um, when I first started at the department, uh, I sat next to a military assistant who, uh, told me a story about being on a fob in Afghanistan. having to wait five days to have his equipment repaired. Uh, they had to bring a contractor in to get it done. Um, I I was very surprised by that, um, certainly not, uh, acceptable and, um, if confirmed, it will be a, it'll certainly be a focus of mine.

1:43:30 – 1:43:44

Well, I I I hope that this is a serious commitment because, uh, both in terms of time and cost, uh, the American people cannot afford, uh, long delays in this kind of situation. Thank you. Uh, I do have that commitment, do I not?

1:43:44 – 1:43:46

Yes, Senator, I could absolutely commit to working with you on it.

1:43:46 – 1:43:56

Thank you. Uh, Mr. Hernan- or Doctor Hernan-Piquero, uh, a big part of the cost of Iron Dome is gonna be in your, your domain. Do you have any,

1:43:57 – 1:43:57

Go ahead.

1:43:57 – 1:44:12

any estimates or have you looked at Iron Dome and at, at what the cost projections are? Because we have estimates from the administration of a hundred twenty-five to a hundred and eighty-five billion dollars. CBO recently said over a trillion dollars. What's this gonna cost us?

1:44:14 – 1:44:19

senator king uh i have not been briefed on the details of the golden dome project and the development

1:44:19 – 1:44:21

i said i said iron dome didn't i golden dome

1:44:21 – 1:44:50

uh uh yes senator but um uh it was started as that and so i appreciate that the the system is complex but i and i have not been briefed on the details but i do know that the administration and the and that the program manager on that effort is laser focused on ensuring that we do that affordably And if confirmed, I will work closely uh with the program manager to insure that the space elements of that architecture are scalable and can be delivered at an affordable cost.

1:44:50 – 1:45:15

Thank you. And um, Mister O'Malley, I'm I'm out of time, but uh perhaps I'll follow up uh with a question on this. I'm very concerned about the administration's continuing pressure toward building warships abroad. I think that's a terrible idea, both from a national security point of view and an industrial base point of view, American workers point of view, uh, Are you aware of this push by OMB to build warships in South Korea and Japan?

1:45:17 – 1:45:23

Uh, S- s- Senator, I'm I'm not aware of that specifically, uh, but it's certainly something that I'd take for the record and happy to respond with.

1:45:23 – 1:45:34

Well, I hope you will, because it's very disturbing and and wrongheaded in in my view, and I think it's a uh, an insult to American workers. So I would appreciate if you would follow up on that. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

1:45:37 – 1:45:43

Uh, thank you. Uh, Mister Hurst, should you be confirmed,

1:45:42 – 1:45:42

Uh-huh.

1:45:44 – 1:46:10

um, and, um, if a member of this committee or a member of this Congress called you up and asked you for some information about the cost of the current, uh, operation in, uh, and around Iran and the Strait of Hormuz, you would, um, readily speak to that member of congress and supply that information, would you not?

1:46:11 – 1:46:15

Chairman, absolutely. On this or any other issue, I will be transparent with congress.

1:46:16 – 1:46:23

OK. Thank you very much. And I I believe uh Senator Banks is next in line.

1:46:23 – 1:46:41

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Secretary Hearst, the one big beautiful bill provided funding to critical industrial base areas, such as solid rocket motor production some of this funding remains unobligated as of today why have those funds not been obligated

1:46:45 – 1:46:54

senator i'd have to get back with the department and find out exactly uh what funds are unobligated from those lines um but i commit to doing that and and i'll take that for the record

1:46:54 – 1:47:00

uh i appreciate that no no no idea can you speculate it all or i appreciate you getting back with us and

1:47:01 – 1:47:04

I I don't know where that is in the contracting process, Senator.

1:47:04 – 1:47:23

OK. All all industrial base funding through IBAS and title three must go through the economic defense unit for deal team involvement for negotiating equity. What can be done to expedite that process, especially for solid rocket fuel production?

1:47:27 – 1:47:35

Um. senator uh that's a little bit outside of my lane um but i can take that for the record and find out what the current policies are in the department for that kind of acquisition

1:47:35 – 1:48:04

ok i i look forward to that appreciate that also mister hearst if confirmed you'll play an important role in the potential reconciliation three point O last year the reconciliation bill secured one hundred and seventy million dollars for a navy radar depot but the money instead went to the army How will you ensure that the department follows congressional intent for future reconciliation bills? Certainly better than the last one.

1:48:06 – 1:48:19

Senator Banks, I think we can make some improvements in our process and communication regarding reconciliation spending. Uh, part of that is developing better tools inside the department, so we can quickly gather information and share it with Congress. And if confirmed, I'm committed to doing that.

1:48:19 – 1:48:21

Any ideas on how we can do that better?

1:48:21 – 1:48:31

I I think the the biggest thing is making sure we have the uh software in place and visualization tools to track things in real time uh so we can share adjustments to spend plans with congress

1:48:32 – 1:48:42

ok i i look forward to you submitting uh your questions to the first couple of your answers to the first couple of questions uh for the record i'll look i'll look for those answers mister chairman i yield back

1:48:43 – 1:48:48

um thank you thank you very much and i do believe we have senator kelly next

1:48:50 – 1:50:24

thank you mister chairman um mister hearst the administration wanna follow up on uh senator king's question about golden dome so it's made it a priority it is a significant investment in limited resources that we have um so before congress commits taxpayers to what could become the most expensive defense program in our nation's history We need some confidence that the system is gonna deliver the capability that's being promised. And to me, right now, it's clear that it won't. The most ambitious elements of Golden Dome is the space-based interceptor layer. Uh, and that is gonna face significant technical challenges. Um, the cost, the physics, the likely reliability, in my view do not support a full scale space-based intercept architecture. This means that we could spend more than a trillion dollars and end up with a system that's not gonna work and it's not gonna improve meaningfully improve our security. So, Mister Hurst, what analysis gives you confidence that Golden Dome is a responsible use of taxpayer dollars rather than an extraordinarily expensive system that's not gonna achieve the stated objectives.

1:50:25 – 1:50:49

senator kelly i appreciate your background in this area um i would say i have confidence in this because i trust the program manager general gutlein to make these kinds of determinations and change course inside the program if necessary to achieve an outcome at the appropriate cost for the taxpayer this is a better issue to be held in a classified session Uh, but if you haven't gotten a brief from him, sir, I I'd recommend it. It's it's compelling.

1:50:49 – 1:51:02

I've gotten I've gotten multiple briefs from him. Uh, have you seen an an analysis, a technical analysis that has convinced you that this is achievable? Or you just trust that he tells you we can do this?

1:51:04 – 1:51:08

I believe it's possible to have a space-based interceptor capability. I think, um,

1:51:09 – 1:51:10

Based based on

1:51:11 – 1:51:14

I think I think the big the big determination there is

1:51:11 – 1:51:11

on what?

1:51:14 – 1:51:19

what will the cost per unit be, whether or not it's a fieldable capability that produces the kind of result we want.

1:51:20 – 1:51:32

do you understand that defeating a system with countermeasures and decoys is cheaper than interceptors

1:51:33 – 1:51:38

um i'm familiar with some of the dynamics of an um engagement in a space environment.

1:51:38 – 1:51:52

yeah and that so that becomes a math problem like in economics math problem. Is that the adversary's ability to defeat the system is less expensive than our cost to build the system.

1:51:55 – 1:52:06

It will depend on how the technology turns out, but I think there's an opportunity to avoid um that exact engagement scenario, uh in a manner that makes the system uh more effective.

1:52:06 – 1:52:07

How do we do that?

1:52:07 – 1:52:10

I think uh again that'd be a better classified session.

1:52:10 – 1:52:11

But you know how we do that?

1:52:12 – 1:52:22

Uh, I have it, I've had a brief on that and um, if that's still a general good line of thinking is, uh, I think it's a possibility that we should be interested in investing in the research and development dollars in it to procure.

1:52:23 – 1:52:46

Let's say uh, if the department cannot demonstrate that Golden Dome will provide the level of protection that the administration publicly states it will, I mean why would, why would Congress be asked to commit more than a trillion dollars over the life cycle? before these questions have all been answered, because I'm not convinced they've been answered.

1:52:46 – 1:52:50

Senator Kelly, I haven't heard that cost estimate of a trillion dollars. I've heard one.

1:52:50 – 1:52:50

From the CBO.

1:52:51 – 1:53:07

Is that what you're saying? Well, I I think the department's cost estimate at the time that I was PTO comptroller is a hundred and eighty-five billion for the entire system. Um, and the most compelling parts of Golden Dome for me are the situational awareness aspects which will pay dividends for the department outside of, just missile defense.

1:53:07 – 1:54:14

I agree with that. So there are things in the program that make sense. uh, detecting launches, even some other approaches to this, the space-based interceptor part is really, really hard, and the physics clearly favors the offense. So, s- we could go down this road, spend hundreds of billions of dollars, and not get any return on that investment. And missile defense is, you know, too in- important to pursue this just based on aspiration. alone. So, I wanna make sure that we have a system that is technically achievable, strategically sound, and represents the best use of limited resources. Um, and so the department should be able to demonstrate not only what the Golden Dome will cost but that that it can realistically deliver on this promise of missile defense and I have not seen any convincing evidence of that to date. Thank you, Mister Chairman.

1:54:16 – 1:54:19

Uh, thank you, thank you very much. Uh, Senator Sullivan.

1:54:19 – 1:56:48

Thank you, Mister Chairman. I wanna thank the witnesses and their families for your uh commitment to service. It's not always easy, it's can be really hard on the family, so it's great to see all the families supporting our uh nominees today. Uh, I wanna mention to a couple of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle, uh, Senator Kelly, I was with some of the defense tech companies that are working on missile defense and Golden Dome, and I think it'd be great for you and Senator King, Senator Kaine, all you guys, uh, gals, to meet with some of them as well. Um, think there's a lot of innovation happening, and I know they'd welcome the opportunity to brief you guys. Bringing down costs, increasing technological capabilities, and I think it's an exciting time in our missile defense world. Also on the supplemental, um, I really wanna encourage my Democrat colleagues not to just reject that. Little bit of history lessons. Some of you were here, some of you weren't, but when Biden was president, when Schumer was the majority leader, the White House brought up a Ukraine supplemental, and a lot of us worked on it. We improved it, we made it better, and then we voted for it. And this is for Senator Kelly and others when he's leaving. Um. you know, during the NDAA mark-up there was a lot of discussion about munitions. People wanted to talk about munitions. And so this is a munitions supplemental. And I really, it would be really disappointing if my Democrat colleagues, uh, say out of hand we're gonna reject the supplemental. We didn't do that when Biden was president and Schumer was majority leader. And it would be really disappointing if you guys did that, and if you guys voted against cloture on the NDAA today. There's a lot of politics going on, but usually the politics that are encompassing the country don't usually kind of come to the armed services committee. And if the NDAA is rejected today, if the supplemental is rejected, uh, I think my colleagues on the other side of the aisle, uh, of the aisle know that that'll be just for politics. And usually we try, the serious senators on this committee, try to forego politics and focus on national security. And I hope when it comes to supplemental, when it comes to getting on the NDAA today, that um they do the right thing and uh that would be voting for these things or at least considering them i know the minority leader schumer doesn't care about national defense but you guys do and i think that's important so um

1:56:48 – 1:56:53

if the war was authorized mister senator if the war had been authorized it would be a different discussion

1:56:48 – 1:56:56

let me uh let me let me just uh let me uh let me uh was the ukraine war authorized

1:56:55 – 1:56:59

the the gentleman the senator from alaska has the floor

1:56:57 – 1:57:54

just yeah uh i think you know i'm onto something that's correct And I hope you guys just don't reject it out of hand, cuz you're being told to by your uh far left leadership, which isn't serious about national security and never has been. So, let me um, let me turn to uh Mister O'Malley, um Mister Hertz. One of the things that I've been trying to do, again bipartisan in this committee, is lead the efforts on multi-year procurement opportunities that can help us on our defense industrial base, can help us bring down the costs. Um, can you talk more about the utility that comes from multi-year procurement, uh, capabilities in the Pentagon, and encourage services to use it? Some have, some haven't, and I think it's a tool that's important. Either of you can take that.

1:57:54 – 1:58:16

Uh, thank you, Senator. Yes, multi-year procurement is a powerful lever to drive down unit costs. um, to expand industrial capability, capacity, and to secure our supply chains. Um, this long-term demand signal is important for industry, it gives the defense industry a base predictability and stability, um, and it allows the suppliers to make larger capital investments. Um.

1:58:16 – 1:58:20

And do you, do we see all the services utilizing this to its full capability?

1:58:21 – 1:58:35

Um, s- s- Senator, the, this, the services, uh, are working through all of their programs. It's my understanding. working through all their programs and working through the trade-offs on that. Um, so I do know that they're engaged in that, in that question.

1:58:35 – 1:58:40

OK, if confirmed. Can you help, uh, encourage them to do so? Some have done it better than others.

1:58:40 – 1:58:42

Yes, Senator, if confirmed, I will.

1:58:42 – 1:59:24

Great. Uh, Mister Hernandez, uh, Bar- Barquero, I wanna talk about some of the things that are going on with regard to missile defense. Um, in Alaska we have Clear Space Force, the LRDR system there, Coburdane. at shimmy uh of course the um ground-based missile interceptors at fort greely uh if confirmed will you commit to working with me to achieve the funding needed to bring the next generation of capabilities in terms of missile defense to alaska where uh we are the cornerstone of missile defense for the country right now and the golden dome is gonna build on the uh components in alaska but the components are still very important

1:59:27 – 1:59:37

Senator, I'm aware of how vital these systems are and if confirmed, I would look forward to working with you to ensure that we have the right uh sensing systems and response systems to protect our homeland.

1:59:37 – 1:59:39

Great. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

1:59:39 – 1:59:40

Senator Slotkin.

1:59:42 – 2:03:19

Thank you and thanks for being here. Um, you know, I think um, it's important to recognize that we are back at war with Iran. The cease-fire is dead. Uh, fourteen American citizens have been killed, um, uniformed military, four hundred injured. The Iranians now have a veto over what goes through the Strait of Hormuz. Um, Mister Hurst, you are, you are, um, here to get the top job, um, as Comtroller, handling the money for the department, hugely important job. Um, and you've heard from my colleagues, and, and I will say for, for Senator Sullivan, those of us who care deeply about national defense, I I don't think it's a a big ask to try and just get the straight numbers for the cost of this war. And this committee for twenty years handled the cost of Iraq and Afghanistan. That's part of our business. So to ask that we just vote on something and i- without having basic accountability, as you depart, Senator Sullivan, I think is disingenuous. We should be able to get just a very basic answer from the person who wants to be the comptroller, on the cost of the war. Now you said you didn't prepare that answer today, um, because you didn't, uh, wanna look like you had any idea what was going on with the budget. So I did some back of the envelope math, just from what's available on the cost of the war. Um, we know that the war has already cost the taxpayers separately out of their own pockets a hundred million dollars. The cost of gas, you know, fuel prices that have gone up, the cost of airline tickets, delivery uh service fees, um that's seven hundred and fifty dollars out of every American household in the entire country since February. So it's a hundred million dollars. But then there's the the second time they have to pay. You know, they already paid at the office and they've gotta pay again with whatever the ultimate cost of this war is gonna be to the department. The the math that I've seen is you've sent over a formal a request for sixty-seven billion dollars to cover down on some of the costs of the war. Um, that doesn't include any of the repairs to the major damage to our bases and locations in the Middle East, MilKon as we call it. We've seen reports of another thirty billion dollars needed for MilKon. And then since the war has restarted just this month, back of the envelope is a billion dollars for July combat operations. So by my math that's ninety-eight billion dollars. for the cost to the department. You can correct me if if I'm um getting any of those numbers wrong. So a hundred billion dollars already that American taxpayers have paid, plus a coming, let's round it up, ninety-eight to a hundred billion coming in the department's billed, which is taxpayer dollars. So we're starting to hear reports that the department is strained in paying its basic bills. Um, they're parking jets. The CNO was up here in May and said, If he doesn't get more money, he's gonna have to cut training. We're hearing that folks are having a problem with just doing basic exercises. We're hearing that repairs on our bases, like things that serve our families, we're only doing emergency housing repairs. Um, you were, you don't wanna answer any questions for the Comtroller but you are sitting in a job for the army. Can you please say under oath any things that have been postponed, cut back, um, or, uh, put on hold because we do not have money anymore in the army due to the iran war

2:03:21 – 2:03:24

senator i don't have a listing of specific training exercises

2:03:24 – 2:03:48

do you know of any just in fairness has anything been put on hold have anything been has anything been changed in the department because of the cost of the iran war which uh would be normal for me that would be something i would expect every family understands if you're gonna spend a ton over here you gotta tighten your belt But do you know of any programs that have been put on hold, suspended, because of the Iran war?

2:03:48 – 2:03:55

Senator, I don't have specifics, but I will say this, whenever there is a contingency operation because we build our budget two years in advance of getting it,

2:03:55 – 2:03:56

Mm-hmm.

2:03:56 – 2:03:59

we have to make trade-offs inside that budget to fund current operations.

2:03:58 – 2:03:59

Sure.

2:03:59 – 2:04:00

That's always been the way it is.

2:04:00 – 2:04:44

Sure. But I I think this is again, we we want to understand what those costs are. Um, you will be the comptroller in charge of the very new grants and loans that the department putting out and I'm very concerned about just the look of corruption. Um, we know that the president's sons have gotten three point two billion dollars in contracts from the federal government since he became president. Um, some of these things, nine hundred million dollar commitments to Navy contracts for companies associated with Don Junior. Do you understand that even the appearance of a conflict of interest makes you subject to an an an IG uh report? um and that you will be in charge of approving these major contracts as they go out the door.

2:04:45 – 2:04:48

Senator, the Comptroller doesn't approve contracts,

2:04:48 – 2:04:50

The spending of dollars.

2:04:49 – 2:05:05

but I we we approve obligation of dollars, but we give it to program offices to go and execute. Um I have great faith in the department's ability to control uh for any kind of uh bias or injustice in awarding contracts. I think we do that very well. I think

2:05:05 – 2:05:27

So you'll be willing to put your name on some of these but some of the biggest contracts in Pentagon history are being let right now. And you're the guy who has to check the switch, right, to get that money. Or I just wanna make sure we are understanding that you will be responsible for putting your stamp of approval on the movement of that money for contracts that could be linked directly to the p- the president's sons.

2:05:26 – 2:05:32

Senator, I wa- I wanna clarify, the Comptroller does not award contra- contracts to the entire department.

2:05:31 – 2:05:32

You move the money.

2:05:32 – 2:05:34

We give program offices money or services money.

2:05:35 – 2:05:49

They make contract awards. You can call it a technicality. I was at the Pentagon. If you don't want that money moving, it doesn't move. So I just wanted me understanding, and I know my time is up, that your name will be on that for these contracts, these historic contracts that are being let to the president's sons.

2:05:51 – 2:05:56

Uh, thank you, Senator Slotkin. Uh, we have Senator Budd and then Senator Kaine.

2:05:57 – 2:06:24

Thank you, Chairman. Congrats to, uh, each of you on your nominations, and thanks to the families as well. Uh, Secretary Hearst, Um, it's great to see you. Based on your time, um, on projects like advanced, uh, Project A, uh, Maven, Project Maven. What's your vision for aligning our defense budget to better support the rapid scaling of AI and autonomous systems? And kind of draw from your history a little bit, if you will.

2:06:27 – 2:07:02

Listen, I think we're in this really interesting path finding phase right now. Well, we're not ready to whole scale commit to programs of record. that are related to autonomous warfare. Uh, but part of the FY twenty seven budget request is arranged as a fund for the defense autonomous warfare group so they can do that path finding and sprinkle that technology across the entire department and then also start to integrate it to existing programs and future programs of in requirements form. Um, but I think what we're gonna start seeing here in the next five years is a rapid acceleration of this technology's integration to every single platform inside the department of war.

2:07:04 – 2:07:23

Thanks a lot. Um, Doctor Hernandez-Bacaro, um, good to see you as well. So, I had a chance to meet uh recently with the next Chief of Space Operations, and I learned about the investments we're making, including uh space-based AMTI. So, what's your plan to make sure that that's a success?

2:07:25 – 2:08:08

Senator, uh, the space-based MTI is a vital uh element of the architecture, provides domain awareness and it's the front-end of the space-enabled kill chains, if confirmed, I will have oversight over that part of the portfolio and my goal will be to, as I noted, my priorities, uh, to take advantage of the acquisition reform that's underway to empower the portfolio acquisition executives that are executing that program, to ensure we do that at speed, uh, building out on the existing capabilities that are out there that we've been able to working with our with partners across the department and uh across the interagency. Uh, and if confirmed, I will be committing to ensuring that we deliver that at speed.

2:08:08 – 2:08:25

Thank you. I look forward to that. Uh, Doctor Mason, it's good to see you again. Um, I'm excited to see what you're gonna do at the NRO. So, with the rapid proliferation of commercial space tech, um, how do you plan to integrate those assets into NRO's operations?

2:08:26 – 2:09:12

senator budd first of all thank you for taking the time to meet i enjoyed our discussion and and got a lot out of it uh in terms of the next gen hybrid architecture uh the key there is that to use your word that these capabilities are integrated uh in the past when we were first starting as a nation the commercial was a bolt on uh so looking at the proliferate as well as the exquisite integrate it together uh is the key uh i would say that in terms of the question about artificial intelligence Uh, that's gonna be the, uh, the means by which that is done. There is, there is, uh, it's not possible to do what we, the government wants to do in terms of, uh, the hybrid architect without AI and then doing it responsibly in a way that we get great effect as a nation, uh, but also are mindful about, um, risk management as well.

2:09:13 – 2:09:31

Great, thank you. Uh, Mister Malley, um, congrats again on your nomination. So, given your mixed background in private sector investments in navy intelligence what are you most excited to tackle first when it comes to cutting through red tape and getting cutting edge capabilities into the hands of our war fighters faster

2:09:32 – 2:10:17

uh thank you senator um i appreciate you acknowledging the private sector background um at the company that i founded we were very much focused on taking large data sets and being able to understand uh answers to questions that maybe you didn't even think of and um it would allow us to um just move that much further ahead in the decision making process. That is certainly something that I'd be excited about. Um, so, but if confirmed, my top priorities are uh the secretary's vision for acquisition transformation um and into a new war-fighting acquisition system, rebuilding the defense industrial base, expanding its capacity, bringing in new and innovative companies, um and elevating and empowering importantly uh our acquisition workforce, uh so that we can make faster risk informed decisions.

2:10:18 – 2:10:43

Very good. Um, question again for you, Mister Malley and Doctor Hernandez-Piqueiro, um, about multi-year procurement. So, there's efforts to do multi-year procurement, um, and the authorities for that on ships, aircraft, munitions. So, what are your thoughts on additional acquisition programs that might be beneficial for? Something like satellites? Anywhere else we could use this multi-year authority?

2:10:45 – 2:11:40

Uh, Senator, I'll start by saying that uh earlier there was a question around launch and the capacity associated with launch, and we're putting a lot of demand on our launch capacity. Uh that would be one area that I would look at uh to not only multi-year procurement, just any incentives that we can do to attract more businesses to go into our launch, to expand our launch capacity. Um that's consistent with how it's been done across the department and other programs, is essentially like capacity uh incentive for businesses to invest. and infrastructure and capital equipment to do that. Uh, and then certainly if, as we proliferate it, as we proliferate the architectures, we have to produce more satellites. Those are elements that perhaps these models would apply. And if confirmed, I will look at uh all of those areas to ensure that we have the right capacity to deliver and to include and to use any s- any tool available at our disposal, including multi-year procurements.

2:11:41 – 2:11:43

Thank you very much. Uh, Mister Malley.

2:11:44 – 2:12:14

uh thank you senator multi-year procurement is a powerful tool the the department um is currently using thanks to the congress to um uh send a stronger demand signal to industry um i also think about the the transition to the program acquisition executive and the service acquisition executive giving them the authority um that they need to not focus on necessarily isolated programs but broader capability portfolios um so multi-year procurement is certainly a tool in the toolbox and um it has been utilized, it's continuing to be utilized and we thank the Congress for it.

2:12:15 – 2:12:16

Thanks, Chairman.

2:12:17 – 2:12:20

Uh, thank you very much, Senator Budd, Senator Kain.

2:12:21 – 2:13:23

Thank you, Mister Chairman, thanks to the witnesses, just a a a point in response to Senator Sullivan and he and I chatted as he was leaving, We do have some time left. not all supplementals are exactly the same and one of the issues that we're sort of grappling with, and this is no surprise I suspect to the witnesses or folks watching with the supplemental is the supplemental is on top of a presidential budget request that increases the pentagon's budget by forty percent in one year and so we're sorta grappling with the forty percent in one year increase and then the supplemental on top of it i think it's natural as exercising oversight to see well if we're gonna increase the defense budget that by that much do you need a supplemental too or can the priorities in the supplemental be folded in and mister hearst my questions to you are sort of i wanna do some budget math with you and you're gonna be better at this than me so i want you to correct me if i get anything wrong last year we passed a reconciliation bill and in that reconciliation bill we provided a hundred and fifty three billion for do d is that right

2:13:24 – 2:13:25

yes senator

2:13:25 – 2:13:47

and your testimony i think is consistent with this that a bunch of that a hundred and fifty three billion has not been obligated the records that we got from the pentagon that were current through July two suggest that sixty eight billion has been obligated but eighty nine billion of it has not been obligated. Does that sound generally accurate to you?

2:13:49 – 2:13:55

Uh, based on the number you gave, Senator, but I I do expect that number to continue to increase through the fiscal year.

2:13:55 – 2:15:25

Yeah. Um, well, well here here's what interests me. So we did a reconciliation bill last year and eighty nine billion of that to DOD is still unobligated. And so then I thought, eighty-nine billion, that that is a s- a a number that's remarkably similar to another number. The administration has sent us a supplemental request for eighty-seven billion dollars. Now, not all of that eighty-seven billion is for the DOD. Sixty-seven billion is for the DOD. Other portions of the request, for example, aid to farmers who have been hurt by tariffs, OK, but set that aside. We have eighty-nine billion dollars unobligated to the DOD from the reconciliation bill. And the administration is asking us for sixty-seven billion dollars in a supplemental that they recently delivered to us. So, so here's the question that I really wanna get to, and I don't know whether in your current role or in your past role, were you grappling with this? Has the Pentagon scrubbed the priorities that make up that sixty seven billion dollars in the supplemental. So for example, twenty one billion is munitions. Have you scrubbed those priorities and then looked at the unobligated eighty nine billion and said, wow, we already have money that we could use to do things that we think are necessitated in the supplemental request. Do you know whether that's been done?

2:15:27 – 2:15:29

Senator, I think it'd be best to be uh, maybe it'd be best to

2:15:50 – 2:17:48

i i suspect that it is and yet we do act according to priorities and so you know we're hearing that the supplemental is needed, let's just use the munitions, of the sixty-seven billion, twenty-one billions for munitions in the supplemental. That is a dire need to replenish munitions stock. It it may be that there are things that were in the reconciliation bill last year that are unobligated priorities that are important but aren't so urgent. And, you know, the the each priority you can give it an importance ranking and each priority you can give it an urgency ranking. And I gotta believe that some of this sixty seven billion dollars in the supplemental, is stuff that would match up with some of the line items, in the unspent, unobligated money from last year. And we wouldn't be doing our oversight job, if we were to just, kind of, you know, forget about the eighty nine billion dollars that still hadn't been obligated, and say we got a rubber stamp to sixty seven. We, we ought to be looking to see whether we can accomplish some of the objectives with money that is already at the department that hasn't, been obligated. And the last thing I'll say on this same topic is, you know, we've also been told that there may need to be a reconciliation bill. So, D and you and I chatted about this in my office, it's been a little complicated this year because the the there was an appropriations request increasing by forty percent last year's appropriated amount. And there is a supplemental request, and then there's also a suggestion that there needs to be a reconciliation request. You know, to to vote on door number two, and I don't, when I'm not exactly sure, behind door number one and door number three, we really need to look at this altogether. So my my hope is, just going back to all of you, is take a look at the unobligated eighty-nine billion and take a look at what you're asking for with the sixty-seven billion in the supplementary request, and see if there's dollars you already have that would enable you to accomplish objectives that have an immediate urgency. Thank you very much.

2:17:49 – 2:18:14

Um, thank you, Senator, and, uh, this concludes today's hearing. I wanna thank our witnesses. in their testimony. I wanna thank all of the families, um, who, um, uh, are present in support of, uh, of their family members for information of members. Question for the record will be due to the committee within two business days of the conclusion of this hearing which is right now. And we are adjourned.

Morning digest

Start every morning briefed on yesterday’s hearings

A free weekday email covering yesterday’s hearings and transcripts newly unlocked in the archive.

Free weekday email. Unsubscribe anytime.