Senate seal

Senate · Hearing transcript

Hearings to examine college sports, supporting student athletes, and fair competition.

Wednesday, June 3, 2026

Summary

  • Sen. Cruz and Sen. Cantwell touted their bipartisan Protect College Sports Act to create national NIL, transfer, and eligibility rules.
  • Nick Saban (Former Head Football Coach, University of Alabama) warned unlimited transfers, collectives, and lawsuits destroyed competitive balance and threaten Olympic sports.
  • Sen. Cantwell pressed Lance Holtzclaw (Student Athlete, University of Utah) on having three coaches in three years harming team development.
  • Sen. Cruz and Sen. Cantwell agreed Congress must act to protect women's and Olympic sports from runaway pay-for-play spending excesses.
  • Witnesses urged swift passage to stabilize college sports, warning inaction will force program cuts and create an elite football super league.

Morning digest

Get hearings like this in your inbox

Free weekday email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Hearing Details

Witnesses

Members Who Spoke

View on Congress.gov

Transcript

Sen. Cruz (TX)26:06 – 37:45

Good morning. Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation will come to order. College sports is one of the few institutions in America that still bring entire communities together. Families plan Saturdays around kickoff. Students pack arenas on cold winter nights. Alumni come back to campus every fall to see friends, to sing old fight songs, and to cheer for the same colors that they wore decades ago. Rivalries are handed down through generations. They become part of family traditions. part of lore and stories that span decades and that connect generations. They become In every corner of the country, college sports carry a sense of place and identity that very few other institutions in America can match. But today, tragically, The foundation underneath college sports is cracking. Fans can see what's happening. Rosters turn turn over every year. Your team develops a great team, and boom, the next year they're gone somewhere else. Schools fight to keep pace with out of control NIL spending. Coaches have to re-recruit their own locker room each off-season. Eligibility disputes are decided by lawsuits and emergency injunctions. Historic rivalries go away. Pro athletes are returning to play in college. The richest conferences keep pulling further and further away, and the mid-major programs become farm teams for the Blue Bloods. In twenty twenty four, Marshall withdrew from the Independence Bowl after its coach left. And twenty-five players entered the transfer portal. UNLV fans watched their three and O team lose its starting quarterback mid-season after an NIL dispute. And the Pac-twelve, one of the most historic conferences in college sports. collapsed under realignment. These things only happen in a broken system. To be clear, this problem wasn't caused by student-athletes profiting from their name, im image, and likeness. The problem is the old system was dismantled without a durable replacement. College athletics is being torn apart from every direction. State laws compete against each other. Agents, collectives, boosters, and media companies make decisions without care for the student-athlete or the greater good. And when national organizations try to create some structure, they're repeatedly sued, forced to change the rules again, or simply blocked from enforcing them. As a lawmaker, It was not my intention to try to insert Congress into college sports. College sports came to Congress because changing the law is the only way to fix the legal chaos that we're seeing right now. Congress, unfortunately, helped create the legal environment in which college sports now operates. Federal antitrust, broadcasting, and interstate commerce laws shape what's and conferences and governing bodies can do. If college sports cannot enforce basic rules because of the laws that Congress wrote, then Congress has a responsibility to adjust them, and we're the only people who can. That's exactly what the Protect College Sports Act does. Legislation that ranking member Cantwell, Senator Schmidt, Senator Coons and I introduced. That's what it's designed to do. For the fans, the Protect College Sports Act creates a national rulebook that restores order to a system that is overwhelmed by transfer chaos, recruiting, inducement, tampering, eligibility lawsuits, and unchecked bidding wars. It preserves real and legitimate NIL opportunities for student-athletes. That's better and more fair. But it also makes clear that college sports should not be a constant and unrestricted free agency, where programs are rebuilt every off-season through payroll instead of coaching, player development, and fair competition. It puts education back into college athletics. Most student athletes, we know, will never play professionally. The statistics are ninety-nine percent of the more than half student athletes in America will not play in the NFL, will not play in the NBA. But college sports is an incredible avenue for opportunity for them. Those athletes, they play to compete, to earn a degree, to gain discipline, to become leaders, and to build a foundation for life beyond the field or beyond the court. This bill is designed to put student athletes on a path to a degree. And it protects their scholarships regardless of injury. If they blow out their knee, their scholarship is still there, and regardless of their performance. The bill also brings accountability to the NIL and to the agent marketplace. It requires standard terms and legal protections in NIL contracts. And it prevents agents from charging outrageous fees, which right now is an endemic problem. Young athletes and their families deserve clear contracts, honest representation, and protection from people who make promises they cannot keep. It establishes strong health and safety protections and restores clear eligibility standards so that rules are not written by local judges or a G League player coming back to swipe a roster spot from an eighteen year old kid fresh out of high school. The Protect College Sports Act also gives universities the option to pool media rights, the same authority given to professional leagues like the NFL. I want to make clear, this provision is entirely optional. It is also not a statement on the current use of the Sports Broadcasting Act, as I know many of my colleagues have expressed concerns that the antitrust exemption given to professional sports leagues is not serving consumers in today's landscape. This new option exists so that schools can make TV money work for college sports by helping to generate revenue to support and preserve Olympic sports and women's sports, to protect traditional rivalries for fans, and to keep games accessible for all of those who love them. Some critics ask, With everything going on in the world, why is Congress focused on college sports? Let me explain. If we do nothing, the current trajectory will concentrate more power in fewer hands and will widen the gap between the richest programs and everyone else. In a few years, if we do nothing, we could lose dozens of historic football and basketball programs, not to mention tens of thousands of Olympic sports at colleges dependent on the revenue from football and basketball. Is that what our country wants? To allow federal law, the failings of Congress, to kill off everyone but the SEC and Big Ten. Look, I'm from Texas. I love the SEC, the Big Ten. They're b- they're incredible institutions. But I also love all of the rest of institutions that make college sports so fantastic and fun to watch. If we do nothing. A few years ago, college football in Texas could be reduced to UT and A and M. Both incredible institutions, but if we wake up and those are the only football programs in Texas, we've done something tragically wrong. As much as I love them, I wanna see Baylor and Rice, TCU and SMU and Texas Tech and all of the great institutions being able to compete and having a chance. Our system of college sports is unlike anything else in the world. This is something to reflect on. There is no nation on planet Earth that has anything remotely comparable to college sports in America. I have to admit, before we began working on this, focused on that i never thought of that you just kinda take for granted that's that's what saturdays are about is college football but there's no other country that has a half million kids at any given time many from low income environments many who would never otherwise have a chance to go to school have an avenue to get an education to learn discipline to learn sportsmanship to learn excellence that is extraordinary If we wake up in a few years and instead of a half million kids in college sports, we have half as many, and that opportunity has been taken away, that would be a profound disservice to this nation. And I believe all of us should prevent this. Let me make a final point. L look, this is a time when both political parties are battling like crazy. We practically can't agree on anything. We wake up in the morning, say good morning, and half of us say, no, it's not. Like, it's just that's the reality of the world we're in. I hope and pray and I'm encouraged that this is a moment where we can come together and I will say I I wanna take a moment of praise for ranking member Cantwell. She and I have spent hundreds if not thousands of hours negotiating this bill. It has been excruciating. I am certain ranking member Catwell thought at multiple times we're never gonna get there I have to admit I thought at multiple times we're never gonna get there I'm gonna confess to everyone there is a secret sauce which is when we had moments when everything broke down I did have my staff bring in Cuban coffee I I am now the the the lone remaining Cuban American in in the Senate and Cuban coffee,

Sen. Cantwell (WA)38:10 – 38:12

Well, thank you, Mister Chairman.

Sen. Cruz (TX)38:11 – 38:12

Yeah.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)38:12 – 47:28

And yes, thank you for that coffee. I am from Seattle, so that is a way to get get us going. And uh, I wanna thank the witnesses especially for being here, each of you represent a special expertise on this subject, and your uh thoughts and wisdom today will be much appreciated. My colleagues probably know that there are probably twenty-five things that Senator Cruz and I don't agree on, and that's just in this committee. So saying that it is an accomplishment for him and i to agree on this is saying something we agree today that college athletics are in crisis and we agree that the system is broken and unsustainable universities athletes and fans are pleading with us to do something about this issue schools are cutting women's and olympic programs and they are dropping scholarships I think we have a poster out here that shows that. Erasing roster slots to try to keep pace with out of control spending in football and basketball. And I think as coach Saban says in his statement, that this has turned into pay for play. So we cannot have a pay-for-play system and then continue to cut this many women and Olympic athletes in various programs. Just since twenty twenty three, over a hundred programs and more than one thousand athletic scholarships and rosters in women and Olympic sports have been eliminated. And it's going to get worse. In April, the University of Arkansas and Saint Louis University both announced within days of each other they were going to cut the women's, actually, and men's tennis team. Kansas, Colorado, Rutgers, and Washington State, my home state, beloved institutions with strong alumni bases and storied histories are getting hollowed out. And even if the universities are not cutting sports programs, they are taxing students who are not athletes and taking money out of their general funds to cover ballooning athletic program deficit. James Madison University now charges every student an extra twenty-four hundred dollars a year, for athletics. whether or not they ever step on a field. What once felt like a shared national pastime has become a free-for-all, a money flowing with few guardrails, players and coaches constantly moving, and schools struggling to keep pace. As coach Saban notes in his testimony, and I thank you for emphasizing the effect on women and Olympic athletes. I appreciate that coming from a football coach. the whole ecosystem is important. Coach Sabin says, quote, " We will lose scholarships, we will lose Olympic pipelines, we will lose chances for young people who may never play professionally but whose lives are changed by college sports," end quote. The pay-per-play antics and this failed system are putting our future Olympic athletes and future women sports participants at risk. When you ask the American public in a poll about this, it's not football that rises to the top. Only fifty-four percent of the respondents say they really care about football. Eighty-seven percent of the respondents say the most important thing they worry about is women and Olympic sports. And why not? Because they understand how unique they are and how threatened they are by a system that cuts even one dollar from where we are investing today. Clearly, both of these things, women and Olympic sports, need larger investments than we are doing today. Other countries like China and Russia recruit their athletes and do it through dedicated programs and dedicated facilities. We rely on our college system instead to help train the best. Three out of four members of the twenty twenty-four Olympic team in Paris were current or former college athletes. And it was the women Olympians in Paris who took home the majority of the gold. As Notre Dame athletic director, Piet Bakhvich, who Bakhva, who is here with us today, said, quote, "If we continue to go down this path of no legislative action, Olympic and women's sports around the United States will be at risk both this year and years to come." End quote. i believe the failure of us to act here will make us responsible for the outcome of future olympic teams if we don't come up with a solution but as my colleague senator cruz said none of this is inevitable we can and we should write better rules that put athletes first and keep our institution strong and that is exactly what the college sports act does it protects college athletes hard-won rights to be paid name image and and recognizes revenue sharing as in the settlement agreement. It replaces a patchwork of weak state laws with strong federal laws. And our bill makes sure that an athlete cannot lose a scholarship because of an injury or a bad season. And it requires division one schools to guarantee those scholarships even after they've graduated to make sure they can complete that col- after they've finished so they can complete their college education. It requires division one schools to have medical care while athletes play, and for five years after. And we create a sixty million dollar trust fund for athletes with long-term conditions like CTE. That is landmark investment. It also makes sure that medical staff is independent, so that coaches can never overrule a doctor. And it ensures that whistleblowers can't be retaliated against. The bill puts real rules on unscrupulous agents who have started to our youngest athletes at the high school level. And it does this by making sure that we cap their fees and make sure that they are registered in their states. It also ensures that the NCAA and conferences cannot provide women with unequal facilities. That means travel, meals, rest, championship tournaments. Women's get to be, women get to be treated equally as the men's team. And these rights have teeth. If they're violated, the athletes can have their day in court. This bill also gives institutions a way to raise more money without having to rate endowments or levy new fees. I believe, and I hope that Mr. Gee will emphasize on this today, we cannot lose the innovation race with China because we are cutting university R and D and putting it into sports instead. These institutions have very important roles for our nation right now. And any school that chooses can pool its media rights and negotiate with them, similar to what the NFL and NBA do today. It lets these schools build smarter schedules so regional rivals can play closer to home. It requires that every football and basketball game be offered in local markets for free viewing in the home market. I think every one of my colleagues will want to go home and talk about this. We are not letting content be put behind a paywall. so that you can only access it your favorite team if you buy a subscription. And it brings in real revenue. Experts believe that this could bring in an additional four to eight billion dollars in media rights revenue, money that we would like to dedicate to women and Olympic sports. The solution here is to grow the pie, not shrink it, and give schools more resources. Senator Capito and I wrote the equal pay for team USA now act now the law of the land which requires women representing this country receive the same pay medical care and travel and expenses as men and this bill carries that same principle into law here for college we all remember that the women's n c a basketball players given a single rack of dumbbells while they were playing in a championship tournament and the men had a full weight room So this cannot be the standard. So, Mister Chairman, I again wanna thank you for the hard work that this legislation represents. Many athletes have been hurt by us not having this legislation. As I mentioned, athletes who basically failed to basically get a scholarship or a team that did not stick up for them when they were hurt and shouldn't be playing or someone whose program got canceled. and then tried to go play golf at another school only to be told by the ncaa they couldn't play this bill puts real athletes rights into federal law and i hope we can make it the law of the land very soon thank you mister chairman

Sen. Cruz (TX)47:30 – 48:43

thank you without objection i ask unanimous consent to admit the uh posters into the record and i'll now introduce our witnesses our first witness is coach nick saban which in in a hearing on college sports there is hard to find another witness who who needs no introduction. Mister Saban is formerly the head coach at the University of Alabama, a team under his leadership that was so damn good it was frustrating to every team in the country and certainly frustrating to every Texas team. Throughout his career, his team won a ridiculous seven national championships, one with LSU and six with Alabama, forty-nine of his players went on to become first-round draft picks in the NFL. And even more importantly, at the University of Alabama under his leadership, his players earned six hundred and fifty-six college degrees. Our second witness, someone who's become a friend over time, Pete Vivacqua, and I'll turn to our colleague from Indiana, Senator Young, to introduce him, but I will on behalf of the committee ask him to break into the notre dame fight song as he does the introduction

Sen. Young (IN)48:45 – 50:10

well uh thank you mister chairman and welcome to our witnesses uh very few leaders in america are as familiar with the intersection of athletics and business as pete bivacqua and it's a privilege to introduce him for today's hearing pete's been the athletic director for uh notre dame since twenty twenty four of course this is not his first go around at the university He's a fighting Irish alum. He graduated magna cum laude and was a walk-on punter for the legendary Lou Holtz. He arrived for his second stint at Notre Dame with extensive experience and great success in in sports business, serving as chair of NBC Sports CEO of the PGA of America and the first managing director of the US Open championship. He was also global head of golf at Creative Artists Agency, one of the premier talent and sports agencies in the world. I can't fail to mention that Sports Business Journal uh named him one of the one hundred twenty five most influential sports executives of the last twenty five years. Uh, he and I have had uh productive conversations about the future of collegiate sports. We will continue those conversations. I know his experience and vision will be instructive to all of us. So, Pete, thank you for being here. and for contributing to this important conversation today.

Sen. Cruz (TX)50:12 – 50:19

Thank you, Senator Young. We'll now turn it over to our colleague from West Virginia, Senator Capito, to introduce our third witness, uh, Gordon Gee.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)50:20 – 53:20

Thank you, uh, Chairman, and I am excited, uh, to be in this hearing today for many reasons, most importantly because we have two great West Virginians, uh, on the panel, one honorary and one born and raised in Marion County, the first being Doctor E. Gordon Gee and the second, Coach Nick Saban. Thank you both for being here. I'd also like to thank you all for giving me the opportunity to introduce Doctor Gee, a champion for cath- college athletics who has made a profound impact on my state's trademark public land-grant higher education institution, West Virginia University. Doctor Gee, or as we call him, Gordon, was born in Utah and attended the University of Utah, but he is quick to mention that he is a born-again West Virginian. Having served twice as president of WVU, and he always wears his signature, he had the gold and blue bowties. He has experience having served as president of five different universities throughout his career, the University of Colorado, Ohio State, the Ohio State University twice, Brown University and uh Vanderbilt University in addition to WBU. He has also signed more uh college diplomas than anybody else in in the history of this country. He has a long list of academic accomplishments and achievements in uh that he took into his retirement from WVU last summer. But we're here to talk about a a topic that Gordon remains central to Gordon's focus and identity and that is college athletics. Gordon has long been quick to recognize that on-field success translates to the overwell overall well-being and health of an institution. He says athletics is the front porch of the university, the place where people look at us and decide whether or not they wanna walk through that front door. He has served at the Big Twelve conferences, representative to the college football playoff board of managers, as well as chair of the Big Twelve conference board of directors executive committee. As Gordon navigated WVU through the challenges and complexities of the COVID-19 pandemic, he was a leading voice in maintaining that the twenty twenty college football season would go on, saying that West Virginia University will be playing football, even if I have to suit up myself. Gordon's, look at Gordon, uh, Gordon's vast experience in this field will enhance the perspective of our members as we discuss ways to protect college sports and support our athletes. He's battle-tested in this arena and understands factors that jeopardize the co- the future of college athletics as we know them and the impacts that they make. In a recent op-ed, Gordon noted that when it comes to the current state of college athletics, quote, there is so much at stake. the future of of the Olympics, the future of women's sports, the opportunity for young people to earn a scholarship, and compete for something greater than self, and become tomorrow's leaders. So I look forward to hearing from Gordon about how he sees Congress's role in preserving this crucial aspect of our society and I really thank him for being here, and thank him for his friendship.

Sen. Cruz (TX)53:22 – 53:30

I thank my friend, Senator Capito, and and in defense of our witness, I I will note he he may not be big, But I am confident he's really damn quick.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)53:30 – 53:31

Mmm.

Sen. Cruz (TX)53:32 – 54:22

Uh, our next witness is Theresa Gold, Commissioner of the Pac-twelve. As Commissioner, Miss Gold has sought to build upon the one hundred year legacy of the Pac-twelve by launching in twenty twenty six with nine member universities. She brings extensive experience in athletics management from UC Davis, UC Berkeley, the West Coast Conference, and the Midwestern Collegiate Conference. And our final witness is Lance Holtzclaw. Mister Holtzclaw is a student athlete, welcome, playing defensive end for the Utah Utes football team. He played football for the University of Washington before transferring to Utah in twenty twenty four. Coach Sabin, you are recognized for your opening statement. Uh, can you make sure to turn your microphone on?

Nick Saban (Witness)54:23 – 1:05:25

Thank you, Chairman Cruz. I could use a little of that Cuban coffee. Cuz I didn't sleep much last night worrying about this testimony, uh, ranking member Cantwell and members of the committee, thank you for the opportunity to testify. And I really want everybody here to know, uh, that I'm not here to represent a conference or a team, but to preserve college athletics as a whole. You know, I think we all have to ask ourselves a question, what is our guiding principles for the future of college including Olympic, women, and non-revenue sports. You know, I've spent my adult life in college athletics. I believe in it. I've seen people come, young people come in the program. Um, need structure, need discipline, need coaching, need academic support, uh, need accountability. Uh, and I've seen them leave with a degree, a career, a family, and a better chance to be successful in life. I think the current system uh that we have in college athletics right now makes it more and more difficult uh to do these things we've moved away from development to focusing on money and not life skills so to put this in perspective if you had the biggest baddest ferrari that you could ever have and it was going a hundred and fifty miles an hour toward the grand canyon somebody needs to tap the brakes and i think that's what we all need to do here and i'm gonna veer a little way from my testimony and you some examples of you know things that i think people may not know that are happening in college football that are huge problems. First of all i think student athletes should profit from name image and likeness as long as those things are authentic endorsements they create branding for themselves they sign with the company they do promotions uh i i think these things are all healthy for their education as well as their quality of life. I think name, image, and likeness has become pay for play. You know, I said five or six years ago when a school that I'm not gonna mention who didn't do anything wrong had what is called a collective. A collective is a organization that raises money, basically from alumni, to be able to pay players and disguise it as marketing opportunities. When the school did that, the first school that did it, I said, does this what we want college football to become? And I got really criticized for that. But it has become that. And um, it's become pay for play. And we've also extended the opportunities now to funnel money from operations, which come to the universities, as marketing opportunities from the university's standpoint, to funnel that money out of operations into paying players. So now if you take that twenty million dollars or whatever it is, you could fund five or six Olympic and women's sports. So these are things that I think need to be addressed, and I think this bill takes a big step forward in doing that. So I think this bill also creates a competitive balance. You know, the NFL, the NBA, Major League Baseball, They all have some kind of rules that govern how they compete. It creates parity, it it creates um you know, something that gives you the opportunity to uh have a framework to build a fair play system in, which I think is really, really important, and I think this bill does that. Right now in college football we have no rules. We have state laws, we have different in every state, we have litigation. The NCAA cannot enforce their own rules, because every time they try to enforce the rule, there's a lawsuit. So, I mean, an example would be, Ole Miss's quarterback, they say he can't play next year, he's playing next year because of litigation. So, but this is just the way it is. It's become an arm race. Who spends the most has got the best chance to win. But I think it's a race to the bottom because if you don't spend to win, You lose your fan base and you don't have any revenue. So how do you manage the other sports? So, um, the one thing that I think this bill does, you know, sort of enhance the enforcement of the house settlement, uh, which to me is a start, which sort of creates a a revenue share, kind of a cap, uh, and also controls some of the name, image and likeness things that this bill tries to control. So, transferring. You know, I think transferring is a good thing. I don't think a player should be trapped in a bad situation. Uh, but I also think multiple transfers have a negative effect. Uh, I think there can be legitimate circumstances where you can transfer more than once. I think if you graduate you should be able to transfer again, cuz you might have a fifth year where you can have more success someplace else. But, unlimited transfers creates free agency. free agency with a collective, now you're talking about bidding more for players. And then you've got agents out there that are not certified, uh, that are enhancing players or encouraging players to get in the portal I can get you more money. So now we have this unbelievable number of players that get in a portal every year, and we have nothing to control agents, uh, we have nothing to control cam tampering. You know, Clemson had a player that was on campus for a whole week, and they come and get, got him off the campus and took him someplace else. So, the, these kinds of things going on in college football are absolutely not what anybody of, any of us signed up for relative to the educational institutions that, you know, we've all tried to, to represent. So, what's the cause and effect of, of transferring? I think every time you transfer you have less and less of an opportunity to graduate. You know, this hits home with me because I actually coached fifty years ago when people didn't graduate. And we saw thirty for thirties on what happened to their life. And we worked hard for a long time to get graduation rates where they are, and I'm proud of the fact that we had six hundred and sixty-eight or whatever the number is, you know, graduates at Alabama over seventeen years. So We we need to get back to, you know, that kind of atmosphere in college athletics. But if you transfer all the time, so first of all, we had players transfer that were in business, so they transfer, they couldn't get business school with the school they transferred to so they got general studies, so they could be eligible. So they minimized the importance of their degree because they transferred. And then also, could they graduate? You got guys transferring three or four years. We have guys playing seven or eight years of college football, which is ridiculous. We had fifty players in the draft this year that were over twenty-five years old, competing against seventeen and eighteen year olds, only because we have no structure in terms of what is eligibility. So the eligibility rule of five years is a really good thing, I think. I think we should protect prep schools if somebody wants to improve their academic circumstance, their clock shouldn't start. And they should still have five years after that, and I think defining who is a pro. I know a guy came from the G League, that's a pro. There's also guys coming from Europe that are pros, that are not under the same rules and regulations. I think all those things need to be controlled. So the collective, what what if we continue to invest more and more in football and basketball? Let me give you the history. My first year we had collective at Alabama. two point seven million. Next year, seven million. Next year, ten million. I retired. Next year, seventeen million, next year, twenty four million. Now you have schools that have close to forty million dollar rosters. So, if we continue to do that, we're gonna lose Olympic sports, we're gonna lose non-revenue sports, we're gonna lose scholarships, and basically what's gonna happen is we're gonna have football and basketball succeed and we'll have club sports for everything else with no scholarships. That that that's that's horrible. I mean, we can't let that happen. And I think we have to continue to figure out ways that we can raise revenue so that we can keep all sports and all opportunities for all young people intact. I think we have to protect scholarships. We mentioned that. Injury, roster decisions, athletic performance should not be r- reasons to get rid of a player. But what we've created now with the portal, which we think is a good thing, all the coach has to say to a player that's not very good is get in the portal. I don't want you on the team. So he gets in the portal and maybe he doesn't get an opportunity. Thirty percent of the people who get in the portal don't get an opportunity. So nobody talks about those things. And it minimizes because everybody recruits out of the portal how many young people out of high school get an opportunity to get a scholarship and play college football and start a career. So I think medical protection, injury protection, and health care are something that's really really important but i also think that congress does not need to micromanage college athletics there's lots of people out there that can help us do that congress does need to fix the mess and the courts create a national framework so people inside college sports can enforce fair rules without legal certainty every rule becomes another lawsuit every standard becomes another risk and the system keeps drifting toward the professional model I believe we want an education-based model that compensates athletes fairly, protects athletes properly, and still preserves development, competition, opportunity, and tradition. That is what this bill is trying to do. It isn't perfect, and I'm sure many, many adjustments need to be made, and I think there's a lot of people who can add to that. But this is a serious bipartisan effort to bring order to a system that is badly needs fixing. I don't think this is bipartisan. I think it should be nonpartisan. It's that important in terms of college athletics, in terms of the future for young people. It protects athletes, it protects opportunity, it protects competitive balance. It protects the sports that do not always generate revenue but still matter. It gives college athletes a chance to move forward with rules that are clear, national, and enforceable. For these reasons I support the Protect College Sports Act and urge Congress to act. Thank you.

Sen. Cruz (TX)1:05:27 – 1:05:31

Thank you, coach. Mister Mivakwa, you're recognized for your opening statement.

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)1:05:31 – 1:10:56

Well, uh, thank you, Chairman Cruz and and Ranking Member Cantwell. It it's an honor to be here, it's an honor to be here with my fellow witnesses and to represent Notre Dame. And I also wanna thank uh, Senator Young for a very nice introduction and also everything he does for our state in Indiana and for Notre Dame. I I agree with Coach Sabin, uh, this is a major milestone to have this bipartisan support to do something for college sports and I think this bill is an enormous step in the right direction. We we have to act now. There is a tremendous sense of urgency. If we don't act now, women's and Olympic sports are going to be de-emphasized or cut, as as you showed, Senator Cantwell. We need to act now to protect athletic departments, and we need to act now to make sure that the student athlete experience, and these are student athletes, they're not just athletes, that the student athlete experience is preserved and maintained and quite frankly reinforced around the country. We need sanity restored to the transfer portal. We need sanity restored to what it means to be a college student athlete around eligibility. I love the fact that we're talking about protecting scholarships, that we're talking about extended medical insurance, that we're talking about some real regulations around agents that are out there, representing these young men and women. We need a realistic cap. The concept of a cap emanating from the house settlement, in my opinion, is a fallacy. There is no cap. It's an equation. It's an X plus Y equals Z equation, X being the cap dollars, Y being the grey space of third-party NIL, which quite frankly right now is littered with abuse and uncertainty. The more money that can come from the cap directly to student-athletes, I think will go a long way. And at Notre Dame, you know, our North Star in the athletic department is preserving that student-athlete experience. We want an integrated student-athlete experience. And we spend so much time in this country talking about the superstars. In our world, the Jeremiah Loves, the Hannah Hidalgo's, uh, Caitlin Clark's, the Cooper flags. But if Congress doesn't act now, there are going to be thousands and thousands and thousands of stories of young men and women, particularly in football and men's and women's basketball, that bounce around to three, four schools. And when you're going to three or four schools over a defined finite amount of time, the educational aspect of this becomes a total farce. And maybe they're earning NIL money along the way, in bits and pieces. And maybe at a young age you feel that NIL money is gonna cure all of your monetary woes for the rest of your life. But these are not the type of kids who have the talent to make it in the NFL, the NBA or the WNBA. And you're gonna have a generation of student athletes, thousands of cases that are finishing their college journey without a college degree, with money that is fleeting, so by the twen time they're twenty five they've torn through that money. And it's kind of a good luck with the rest of your life. You know, when we make a promise to our student athletes, we talk about four for forever. You're four years at Notre Dame. You're four years, you're five years at any university. Whether it's the University of Alabama, West Virginia, the universities in the Pac-twelve where Lance is at Utah, that school owes those student athletes the skills, the education, and the degree to make it in life. And so, I applaud this bipartisan effort. Coach Saban said, " Hey, it's not perfect." But it's progress, it's tremendous progress. And if we don't act now, I, I fear the future of college sports. We need a realistic cap. We need to clear that up. We have to be forthright with one another. If we have these continuing runaway rostrophes, primarily around football and men's basketball, I think there's gonna be two inevitable outcomes. You're gonna have a super league. Because there's only gonna be a small number of universities that are gonna year in and year out and say, OK, we can still invest this type of money to field a nationally competitive football team. I don't think a Super League is good for college football, and I certainly don't think a Super League is good for college sports. The other thing, and I think we've all said it, and and Senator Cantwell, you said it so well. Even the strongest universities, the healthiest universities, if you continue to have these runaway roster fees, if you continue to have a failed house settlement with a cap that is not realistic and continued motivation to move into that grey space of thirty third party NIL, you are absolutely going to see the continuation of the slide that you put up with cutting and de-emphasizing Olympic and women's sports. And that would be a very, very sad day for this country and an unbelievably negative thing to take away all those amazing opportunities for hundreds and hundreds of thousands of young men and women who get their life started in a great direction by participating as a student athlete at universities all around this country. So I I thank you for the efforts you've made so far. I thank you for this bipartisan bill that you've put there. I hope and I know that you wanna work with all of us and leaders in the college space to get this bill in as good a shape as possible. And as I said, I'll repeat myself, I think it's a wonderful step in the right direction.

Sen. Cruz (TX)1:10:58 – 1:11:00

Thank you, Mr. Gui. You're recognized for your opening.

Gordon Gee (Witness)1:11:01 – 1:12:17

thank you very much uh mr. chairman and certainly uh ranking member cantwell i'm really honored to be here today in fact i feel a little bit out of place uh with all of these uh yeah i i couldn't i'm five five and a hundred and forty pounds i could hardly get out of bed in the morning let alone uh play anything so it's it's it's very difficult for me to think about hanging around with these folks but i'm but i'm grateful to do so and i thank you uh madam senator uh who is my dear friend from uh west virginia who does a great job uh but not only that as she is just a great person and her husband charlie is a member of the university's board of governors and uh and they are just devoted to west virginia so thank you very much i'm i'm delightful to be here delight to be here and and if i could just say amen to what coach saban said and amen to what uh uh to what my good friend pete said i would do so and uh but i will add a few other things yes i have an unstable employment pattern i have been president of five universities for forty five years um and uh most of the time i have left voluntarily um uh couple of time couple of times i i left just ahead of the sheriff but uh

Sen. Cruz (TX)1:12:17 – 1:12:19

mister sometimes that happens in politics too

Gordon Gee (Witness)1:12:19 – 1:18:37

i i could i i know we're we're in a we're in a uh uh the same kind of business in some ways you know i i i must just say that uh i get uh uh the you know woodrow wilson uh left the uh the presidency of princeton to become the governor of new jersey as you well know and when asquire left uh princeton he said he wanted to get out of politics so i uh i sort of think that we're in the same business as a matter of fact so i uh but but in during that time i've i've been privileged to serve these great universities but what i've really been privileged to do is i've been privileged to serve the people of the states in which i in in which i find myself and there these are wonderful people who care deeply about their institutions and care deeply about the opportunities for the young people and and so uh i get so much joy from from fulfilling those expectations and i do have my name on about a half million uh uh um um diplomas in fact i was in the hotel today writing down uh a guy said said uh hi i i was at vanderbilt with you He's about six ten. I don't know. He was big. Of course, everyone looks big to me. But I uh but uh he was a football player. And he's now working for uh Goldman Sachs. And he said that without that football opportunity at Vanderbilt, he would have been distressed. And I just thought that that was really driving the point home today. I've I've chaired the Big Ten conference uh twice. I've chaired the Southeastern conference. I've chaired the Big Twelve. I've even chaired the Ivy League conference, um, which was the most difficult, I might add. And, uh, and, uh, uh, and then of course I've been heavily involved in college, uh, in the college football playoff. But all all of this is just to say that I have seen it. I have experienced it. Um, and I do believe that there is an exes- existential crisis in college athletics. You're taking a look at the poster boy for some of those problems, uh, presence and Chancellors are not free from blame and certainly having been at this for a long time, I probably am at the head of that pack. We've agreed to outrageous salary contracts, reduce the academic mission of being a student athlete, and abrogated too much power to athletic directors and uh conference commissioners. Some, by the way, who seem more aligned with media companies than with their own universities. Um, the end result is that we now have an unsustainable system As as the coach said, as Pete said, we have an unsustainable system unless we take bold action. It's just that simple. The NCAA and the conference is lost in the courts because we fail to allow student athletes to function as true students with great talents who earn the right to monetize those talents so saying that I can hear the chorus now I there are people out there in the back and the bright red things say well this is just a fuzzy headed academic failing to understand the realities of college athletics. Well, I want you to know I plead not guilty. And the reason for that is the fact that I I fully understand the power of college athletics and its impact on the university. Uh, for example, I have yet to be able to persuade a hundred and ten thousand people to show up for a chemistry lecture. Athletics. Well, I I also point out that, uh, you know, coach, to me, uh to me uh to every all the fans it was just a football game to me it was my budget running up and down the field so i had to i had to keep track of that too but athletes play an incredibly important part in the culture and spirit of universities it is absolutely unmatched and what you said uh what both of you said but what you said senator is so true is the fact that i i have traveled the world i have been to so many different institutions around the world this is a unique part of the american culture and it really is so unique that no one has been able to replicate it so this legislation solves uh the governance crisis in college sports with sensible consensus rules which balance and respect both long term stability and student uh athletic crisis also solves the financial crisis which there is a huge financial crisis not only caused by athletics but we have a substantial financial crisis among universities in this country if we don't address it as part of that overall structure we are going to have considerable problems in terms of just sustaining our our our education system. Let me just give you an example. College sports will lose over five billion this year alone. Think about that. The system must capture the billions in media revenue uh that college sports leaves on the table each year. College football already has twice the viewership of the NBA um but half the media revenue. now that just seems to me to be uh to be unsustainable it's something that we cannot really really be able to uh to to even understand so i know that firsthand uh from my time in the conferences etcetera that this is a serious problem this bill provides the option to pull our rights and i say that again to pull our rights where the conferences and schools themselves will decide as you said this is optional whether to sell their rights together but the very fact that we have addressed this is so enormously important. So with this legislation, we bring common sense to a very intractable problem. And I am grateful that uh this is bipartisan. And I and I love what the coach said, it should be nonpartisan. Uh, college athletics should be nonpartisan. It should be about it should be about joy, achievements, and a variety of other things. So making certain that these, there are sufficient resources to support women's sports and Olympic sports are absolutely critical. senator can't well and i have talked about that so many times i feel so strongly about that so today we have an opportunity um and i do believe that that window will close quickly and there are those who don't don't want that window to remain open we have to run through it and i've got some pretty good full backs here including including my my guy right down here he said he'd be my full back too right as a matter of fact so thank you very much mister chairman

Sen. Cruz (TX)1:18:39 – 1:18:42

Although I warn you, he's a defensive end, so he's more used to tackling.

Gordon Gee (Witness)1:18:41 – 1:18:43

I kn- I know, I know, I know, yeah.

Sen. Cruz (TX)1:18:43 – 1:18:46

Uh, Miss Gould, you're recognized for your opening statement.

Teresa Gould (Witness)1:18:47 – 1:24:27

Good morning, Chairman Cruz, ranking member Cantwell, and members of the committee. Thank you for the opportunity to share my perspective on your vital work regarding college sports, an industry I have proudly served for more than thirty-six years. While college sports is now a massive business, Its core purpose remains unchanged despite recent seismic shifts. College athletics has always offered and continues to offer transformational opportunities for young people while serving as an anchor for alumni and communities nationwide to connect to the institutions they love, a cornerstone of American life that is uniquely ours. Today, however, a combination of both internal and external pressures has brought us to a concerning crossroads. Without immediate intervention, we risk significant damage to our colleges and universities, and even more importantly, to the student-athletes who are caught in the middle. Yet, despite the challenges facing the current system, college athletics continues to thrive, expanding its audience, producing future Olympians and leaders, and delivering meaningful value to higher education. Like much of college athletics, the Pac-twelve has faced unprecedented disruption. Yet through periods of adversity, we have remained relentless, creative, resilient, and willing to challenge convention. From securing national representation in governance at both the NCAA and conference level, securing student athlete benefits, providing national exposure for women's sports, the PAC-twelve has consistently challenged the status quo and remains committed to meaningful reform through this process. All of the challenges facing college sports cannot be fixed in a single bill. There are just too many complexities, yet we must act immediately on the most pressing needs that are in front of us. codifying critical student-athlete benefits and protections, providing a limited antitrust safe harbor, enforcing the house settlement as originally agreed upon and intended, ensuring that the implementation remains true to that intent, establishing strict safeguards against bad actor agents who prey on our student-athletes, and creating new mechanisms, including hold media rights, to generate incremental revenue, to help preserve women and Olympic sports, and to fund the growing costs of our evolving model. These core items, all included in the Protect College Sports Act, will help secure our model so that future generations can pursue the same impactful experience our country and the Pac-twelve conference I represent has provided for more than a century. Because many important issues cannot be resolved this year, the proposed commission provides the framework to evaluate the complex changes that require more time and broader collaboration. Leadership of this effort must come from a diverse, balanced body that includes student-athletes, represents the broad spectrum of division one membership, and is grounded in both accountability and transparency. Our future model must encourage fair opportunities for all institutions to invest in student athletes, ensuring reasonable access to the very highest levels of competition. Every program and every student athlete deserves a world where they have a fair shot. Through the commission framework, we must honestly engage in a conversation around student athlete employment status and collective bargaining. Student-athletes deserve a meaningful voice in decisions that affect them. And our future model must reflect that partnership. It should recognize the diverse perspectives and aspirations of all student-athletes, from those in revenue-generating sports with significant economic upside to those in Olympic and women's sports who may be seeking a different collegiate experience. They all matter and they all deserve a voice. The commission should evaluate innovative structures for the future that reduce travel, limit time away from campus, and support student-athlete well-being, while preserving competitive opportunities. And any future governance model must also represent the diverse realities of three hundred plus very differently situated division one institutions. The clock is ticking. We must act now to modernize our system. and address the complex challenges facing college sports. While no solution is perfect, we have a pivotal opportunity to make meaningful progress. Doing nothing is simply not an option. The Pac-twelve is committed to being part of this solution. If we come together at this critical moment, we can protect the traditions we love while recognizing the rights, offering the experiences, and delivering the protections that our student-athletes truly deserve. Thank you.

Sen. Cruz (TX)1:24:28 – 1:24:32

Thank you, Miss Gould. Uh, Mister Horchklaw, you're recognized for your opening statement.

Lance Holtzclaw (Witness)1:24:34 – 1:27:46

Uh, thank you to Chairman Cruz, Ranking Member Cantwell, and all distinguished members of the committee. I thank you again for this opportunity to appear before you today, available to me through being in college athletics. Uh, introducing myself to you all as I'm probably the least recognizable face sitting on this witness stand. But my name is Lance Holzclaw, and I am a football student athlete at the University of Utah. And it's an honor to be here representing current and future student athletes across the country. My journey to this table began in my hometown of Dorchester in Boston, Massachusetts. But during my sophomore year of high school, I had moved to Mesa, Arizona. And sports have become a major part of my life at a early age, and have helped teach me discipline, resilience, accountability, teamwork, and what true brotherhood looks like. Since Pop Warner football, I've dreamed of competing at the collegiate level, while pursuing an education that would prepare me for life after sports. Also, I'd like to thank my parents, Anika Garcia and Hubert Holzloh, whose unwavering support, guidance and sacrifices have made my journey possible. In high school, I was recruited during the COVID-19 pandemic. Recruiting visits were limited, evaluation periods were disrupted, seasons were cut short and canceled. and many of us were forced to make life-changing decisions under circumstances no previous generation had experienced. Following high school, I attended the University of Washington, where I began my college career. During that time, our team captured the final Pac-twelve championship, went on to college football playoffs and won the Sugar Bowl, and advanced off to the national championship game. I then transferred to the University of Utah, where I earned my degree in sociology and still have one season of eligibility remaining. Throughout my college career, I've experienced college athletics across the Pac-twelve, the Big Ten, and the Big Twelve conferences, giving me a firsthand view of how conference realignment has reshaped the student athlete experience. I want to thank this committee for recognizing the importance of including student athletes in this conversation, about the future of college sports. While I may not have the titles or experience of others testifying today, I do bring a perspective that cannot be replicated, which is the perspective of a student athlete living through these changes in real time. I've experienced the impact of NIL, the transfer portal, conference realignment, evolving eligibility rules, and the many changes shaping modern college athletics. These issues are often discussed through the lens of policy, economics, and governance, but behind every decision are real students, balance of academics, athletics, personal development, and preparation for life. That is why student-athlete voice must remain at the part of these conversations. Decisions about college athletics should not be made solely for student athletes, but made with student athletes. College athletics has provided me with incredible opportunities, relationships, and experiences that have helped me elevate my life in tremendous ways. I believe strongly in preserving these opportunities for future generations while continuing to improve a system that serves the student athletes at its center. Again, I thank you all for the opportunity to be here today, and I'm honored to represent the student athlete community. And I look forward to sharing my perspective with the committee.

Sen. Cruz (TX)1:27:49 – 1:29:53

Thank you very much. I appreciate each of the witnesses being here this morning, and I appreciate your testimony. I th- I think we've heard broad agreement from very different perspectives. That college sports is in crisis. It's ridden by chaos, court cases, and evasion of rules. And if this continues, we're gonna be left with thirty to fifty teams in essentially a mini-NFL. And the victims will be the fans, who see their favorite teams, storied teams with, and programs disappear. And hundreds of thousands of student athletes who will lose scholarship opportunities. Some might disagree. I will say I've been gratified since we introduced this bill last week, the response has been overwhelmingly positive. But there have been some critics who say they don't want Congress involved. They think things are fine. Uh, they think the powers that be can fix whatever ails college sports. And and if you want the status quo, if you think that college sports can fix itself, then you need to defend the alternatives to passage of this bill. The House of Representatives tried multiple times to pass a bill. Unfortunately, it failed. repeatedly. The Protect College Sports Act is the only bipartisan bill out there. It is the last, best hope we have to save college sports. So my, my first question to the panel is, is what happens if we do nothing? There's a lot of expertise on this witness panel. help us look into the future if congress fails to act if we get locked up in partisan grid gridlock and we just yell at each other, which sadly we're very good at what happens to college sports three four five years from now and i open it up to to anyone who wants to answer that

Gordon Gee (Witness)1:29:55 – 1:31:16

well i'll uh senator i'll start by simply saying that uh looking at the um looking at the trends that are going on at the moment if we if we think about the macro trends which are higher education itself. Higher education has lost the trust of the American people in many ways. We uh uh not many not as many students are going into uh into universities. We have um we have a uh demographic cliff. We've got all of these issues. So on the macro level and then all of the issues concerning the fact that our research really is what sustains us in terms of competition at an international level um without uh uh without solving this problem mmm s- many of those issues are going to be also uh writ large because athletics represents such an important way for us to tell our story i i i don't think of i don't think of athletics as being simply games being played i mean i do enjoy them but i think about it as a way for a university to tell its story about the quality of its institution about its research about its students about the things that are going on And with uh at the moment the chaos will simply prevent all of that from happening. It will be a significant blow to the higher education system, let alone to college athletics.

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)1:31:18 – 1:32:50

And I I would add, Senator Cruz, and I I certainly agree with Gordon, I think if it continues to go down this path, as I like to reference of kind of a financial train, and and like I think everybody up here, we we adamantly believe that student athletes ought to be compensated and should have a legitimate NIL compensation, of course. But you're gonna see certain schools invest, maybe almost singularly, in certain sports. And if you take football for instance, no matter what, if you continue to have all of your resources pulled into football with, with escalating roster fees, and not knowing where that ends, I believe the inevitable outcome is there's gonna be a small handful of schools that will differentiate themselves from other and play football at a super league level. And, I don't think it's good for college football to be a mini NFL. That's not the spirit of college football, that's not what college football is about. I think it would look far more like a JV football professional league, than everything that makes college football so special. And if certain schools pour all of their resources into football or to men's basketball or to women's basketball, what I said in my opening has to happen, even very well positioned schools, you're going to have to de-emphasize Olympic sports and women's sports. And so we have to kind of right this road, put some regulations around it, restore some sanity, preserve the student athlete experience, and make sure that we can chart a healthy, sustainable future.

Sen. Cruz (TX)1:32:52 – 1:34:02

Well, and you talk about the virtues of college athletics, as you know I had the the great joy of coming to Notre Dame and and last year for the a and m notary game game not meaning to to rub salt in the wound but you did come to college station and whip her ass the year before uh but but i will say seeing touchdown jesus it was a bucket list and and the culture at notre dame and alabama and so many schools is incredible and and your institution does have one of the iconic sports movies to ever be made rudy Which is not about an NFL player. It's not about a guy who's like, you know, an all-time great. It's about someone with heart that can, through sports, achieve something extraordinary. And, and, uh, Ms., Ms. Gould, the Pac-Twelve has had a tough few years. Um. What did the Pac-Twelve learn about conference realignment and, and the greater college sports ecosystem from your experience leading the Pac-twelve during what has been a very turbulent time.

Teresa Gould (Witness)1:34:04 – 1:35:22

Well, thank you for the question. It has been, uh, a challenging few years, but we are launching a new league on July one and we're really excited about that on behalf of our student athletes. Look, I think in part what I learned, and Lance, um, mentioned this in his testimony, was what can happen when you don't keep the well-being of student athletes at the center of your decisions. And what has transpired not just with the Pac-twelve, but across a lot of conference realignment and a lot of change that's happened in our system, is the well-being of student athletes is no longer at the center, because of the economic pressures that we're dealing with. We now have Olympic sports student athletes traveling coast to coast for contests. We have student athletes that never show up at an in-person class on their campus anymore and are completely missing out on campus life. So I think for me, you know, when I look back on all of it and how everything transpired, um I think we need to make sure that we always remember who we are here to serve and that the decisions that we make, while there are business ramifications, are decisions about the lives of the young people on our campuses.

Sen. Cruz (TX)1:35:23 – 1:35:24

Thank you. Ranking member Cantwell.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)1:35:25 – 1:35:44

Thank you, Mister Chairman. I wanted to um uh start with you, Mister Holtenclaw. I know you're no longer a Husky, but thank you for that uh championship uh game and season in twenty twenty four. Um, I think you told my staff one of the reasons why you transferred is that you had three different coaches in three years. Is that right?

Lance Holtzclaw (Witness)1:35:45 – 1:35:46

Yes, that's correct.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)1:35:46 – 1:36:05

So I think Miss Gould just said the effect on students, and people don't realize that then in this arms race of money and coaches transferring that the students, I mean, how can you be how can you learn any system or coach or synchronicity if you have three different coaches in three years?

Lance Holtzclaw (Witness)1:36:07 – 1:37:18

Well, like you say it, it is definitely a difficult task. Uh, I will like to explain a little bit. Uh, my first year I got recruited by one coaching staff, and then when I had got there, that coaching staff was no longer there. new coaching staff comes in, is played with that staff, and then a new staff comes in after that, I then transfer, have another staff there, one year there, another staff leaves. So, again, it just kind of ties back into people staying and leaving and kind of the leadership portion that's really important when it comes to the team. Uh, that leadership portion is so important, it drives the team, it keeps the team together, uh, it holds them tight together and creates that real family bond that comes in when you're playing college athletics. Um, it's extremely important to how the careers of these young men and women go out and how they're developed in their time in college athletics. There's so much that goes on with life development, that goes on with your education, that goes on with your life experiences. And I feel like that leadership portion being strong in a system and in a program is extremely important. So when pieces move around a lot, it can alter that sometimes.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)1:37:19 – 1:39:14

Well, it seems to me that this is one of the centerpieces that we're losing. I think all of us up here believe in competition, in real competition, but I think we love the fact that college athletics has put so much focus on developing teams who are successful because they build a team, and not because they have a billionaire in their back pocket. And I think that that's what we're facing here right now. Are we gonna create some rules here that puts people on some level of of equity and parity now i wanted to bring this up with you miss Gould because you've been very polite about this i mean the bottom line is wsu had a thirty five million dollar hole blown in their eighty five million dollar college budget basically that is the revenue that was taken out of the pac-twelve and i think the reason why senator cruz and i have a letter from the big ten and the ac um big twelve and the acc is because they think that that's what's going to happen to them next that somebody is gonna come in and rearrange the deck chairs of those conferences steal the eyeballs schools and then basically leave everybody with everything else now i i believe in the rivalry of the pac of the pac-twelve i believe in the the historic you know rose bowl competitions and the uh unbelievable rivalries between all of these west coast schools uh and and it's been phenomenal but now wsu instead of having a thirty five million dollar media budget has a i think ten or twelve million dollar media budget so are we just gonna let this continue to be this this arms race um what do you think that we should do to make sure that we are saving this and then for you mister uh gee i have a question because you were very clear about where you think the alignment is the alignment is with the new media companies even though we're losing five billion dollars there are people that don't wanna look at an option to create more revenue and that the schools So I I wanna hear from you on on that point, but Miss Gould.

Teresa Gould (Witness)1:39:15 – 1:40:17

Yeah, well, I appreciate that the the act has some um conversations in there about what the future model should look like relative to scheduling and relative to conference alignment and relative to the future model. I think we are at a crossroads where this history that we have in our industry of everybody just poaching some other league based on media rights dollars or whatever the driver might be i think we have to take a step back and really think broadly and creatively about what the future model should look like and as i referenced earlier because it has impacts on other institutions in these states and because it has practical impacts on student athletes i really look forward to the work that the commission will do around this and to be creative and innovative, maybe we look at regionalizing Olympic sports to try to keep student athletes at home. But I think now is the time for us to think about the role of conferences and what the structure looks like moving forward.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)1:40:18 – 1:40:20

Mister, Mister Gee, has the current system failed?

Gordon Gee (Witness)1:40:22 – 1:40:28

Absolutely, that's the reason we're here today. I mean, we would not be having this hearing if there, if we had a system that was working.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)1:40:29 – 1:40:33

And so what do we, what, what do you think that on this notion of,

Sen. Cruz (TX)1:40:31 – 1:40:31

Well.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)1:40:34 – 1:40:44

of why university presidents didn't understand that ad's and conferences were taking us down a different direction that was gonna be so painful

Gordon Gee (Witness)1:40:44 – 1:41:06

yeah i i think that um i've always said that uh there are kind of three uh third rails for university presence one is a university home other is athletics and and hospitals and uh i think that so many presidents want to stay somewhat distant from college athletics because there are lot of issues that surround that i think that uh

Sen. Cantwell (WA)1:41:05 – 1:41:10

but hasn't that cost us a lot of money it's costing us five billion dollars or so

Gordon Gee (Witness)1:41:07 – 1:41:11

it is cost us a it it is cost us a lot of lot of

Sen. Cantwell (WA)1:41:11 – 1:41:13

and it's causing mister holtz he he

Gordon Gee (Witness)1:41:13 – 1:41:13

yeah

Sen. Cantwell (WA)1:41:13 – 1:41:19

he wants an experience that that coach saban said that that's why he coaches because he wants to

Gordon Gee (Witness)1:41:18 – 1:41:18

yeah

Sen. Cantwell (WA)1:41:19 – 1:41:25

build that and he can't get that because now we're he is getting a new coach every every other year

Gordon Gee (Witness)1:41:25 – 1:43:01

uh you're absolutely right and that's reason that i am here today you know i should be playing canasta on a beach. I'm eighty two years of age, but uh but uh instead I've I've I'm I'm a convert. As as having been a university president for so long, I uh I realized that what we really have to do is we really have to think about universities having an obligation to each other rather than this kind of darwinning approach that we are that we're taking and and uh I'll be just very honest, I think that uh we have turned over too much power to commissioners, Uh, they have uh, they have a very uh, they have a very limited notion of what, what it should be about. The word student is not in their, in their uh lexicon, the word athlete is, and the word money, and uh this is uh, this is an issue that we have to get at. And I don't, I don't mean to throw them under a bus, although I just did, but what I, what, what I do mean to say is the fact that I think that university presidents need to take charge of this issue, and I believe that they will. You know, I I th think about my friends in the PAC-twelve uh, or in, not in the PAC-twelve, you you're you're really good. I was I'm I'm think I'm thinking about in the Big Ten and the and the SEC. I mean, I know I know most of those presidents, they're really smart people, they're wonderful people. Half of them have worked for me. But uh but we need to have an opportunity to really have those presidential discussions, because this is so simple. We have a revenue problem. Either we grow the pie or we destroy everything that we're about. It's pretty damn simple.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)1:43:01 – 1:43:01

Well,

Gordon Gee (Witness)1:43:01 – 1:43:02

Sorry.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)1:43:01 – 1:43:05

I don't care anything about your hype because you just packed a punch. So thank you very much.

Gordon Gee (Witness)1:43:05 – 1:43:05

Thank you.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)1:43:05 – 1:43:06

Thank you, Mister Chairman.

Sen. Cruz (TX)1:43:08 – 1:43:22

Thank you. I'll now recognize my my friend and and and partner in this bill, Senator Schmidt, who I will note is is the the single best baseball player in the US Senate, although to be fair, in the Senate that's not a terribly high bar.

Sen. Schmitt (MO)1:43:22 – 1:43:31

I was gonna say it's a low bar. It is a low bar. Maybe basketball too, Senator Cruz, you know, you know. Um. Uh, no, but thank you.

Sen. Cruz (TX)1:43:31 – 1:43:32

OK, your time has expired.

Sen. Schmitt (MO)1:43:34 – 1:49:02

Um, thank you. I wanna thank Senator Cruz and, and Senator Cantwell. Um, you know, my journey in working with both of them and, and Senator Cantwell on the, the Sports Broadcasting Act started about six months ago. And, and I think that, um, all of you being here today, lending your voice, uh, to the challenges and the opportunities ahead are very important. I think about, people have asked me why I've gotten so involved in this, and, and I've thought about it. Uh, more recently, you know, sort of the why, and I think that sports in general has, has provided me so many opportunities with, whether it's relationship building or just sense of community. As a former college athlete myself, I think of the lessons that I learned about um, character and determination and grit and teamwork and it didn't matter who the, you know, where he came from, his race, his religion, that was your teammate, and you had a goal. You wanted to accomplish something. There's so many great uh lessons to be learned in life through college athletics. And I truly believe that we are on the precipice of that going away, in large part, not not altogether, but as you've heard today, maybe for a much more limited number of people. You certainly won't have five hundred thousand student athletes being able to learn those lessons every year. Uh, it'll be something very different, something very different that we've gone accustomed to. And I think that college sports, college football in particular, I think, is such a uniquely American institution. And it really is worth fighting for. It's worth preserving. But that is not gonna happen by itself anymore. The system now is, as Coach Saban said, is a, a, a Ferrari going a hundred miles an hour and somebody needs to tap the brakes. And people have asked me, why is Congress getting involved in this? And it's a legitimate question. If you would have asked me this three years ago, I would have asked the same question. Why in the world would the federal government have anything to do with college sports? Well, the truth is, Congress is the only entity on the planet that can provide the antitrust exemption status to empower a governing body to set the rules and to enforce the rules and to have a five-year eligibility standard, to have a one-time or two-time, whatever the transfer portal looks like. No one else can do it. It's, it is up to us. And if we don't do it, I think if we're having a hearing two years from now, Um, shame on us, because it's gonna look a lot different and it won't be better. And I think as we've heard from the testimony, the way I view this thing is, there's two buckets. You have the governance issue, and you have the revenue issue. The governance issue is granting that authority to have the rules, to protect the student athletes, for there to be enforcement. On the revenue side, um, look the business model of college sports forever has been basically you make money program and it subsidizes all the other non-revenue sports, the women's sports, the Olympic sports. We will lose out. If this thing continues down the path, we will not have the same level of athletes competing in the Olympics. Women, I mean my daughters, they talk about the things that, that matter when you go back home. We're in a bubble here so much. But when you go back home, this is what people talk to me about. They don't talk about some CRA we just voted on. They say, what the hell's going on with college sports? They ask about aliens too, to be honest. But, um, But they do ask about this. And I, at my daughter's volleyball games, peop- parents ask about this. And, you know, their daughters may have an opportunity, they may not, to, to, to play college volleyball. But I think for women, the Olympic sports, this is critical. And so if that model is busted, if you're now losing money on your college football program, you're just not gonna be able to do those things. Or if you're spending all your money on your college football program, you're not gonna do those things. You've heard even, and look, uh, I, I'm a Mizzou, I love Mizzou. I love the SEC. It's what I watch on Saturdays. I watch other football too, much to my wife's dismay, and even late end of the evenings. Um, but, I want there to be an opportunity for other schools to be able to compete. And you've got the governance piece and you've got the revenue side. And I think it's very important. This is totally voluntary for the conferences to opt in. Um, nobody has to do it. I wouldn't want the SEC or the Big Ten to do it if it didn't make sense for them. And this is totally voluntary. It sets a process up. It creates a lane by which. conferences could pool their media rights to get a better deal. And if you have, like right now it's, NBA is half the eyeballs of college football, it's eight billion in revenue. College football all in is four billion in revenue. You can do the math, and you can argue that maybe it wouldn't be eight billion, maybe it would be, maybe it would be ten billion, maybe it would be twelve billion, but it's more than they have now. That is the revenue that can subsidize the non-revenue sports for the future. There are protections in place in this legislation to go do that. And so I just wanna have an opportunity for um these universities and these student athletes to continue to uh participate in something that again, is very American, um and it isn't, and we do so much partisan stuff here. It's like Thunderdome a lot of times, right? You got your red jersey on and your blue jersey on. This should not be one of those things. And so I appreciate you all being here. I wish I had time for questions, uh but I've run out of time now. Um but uh you guys have You guys have touched on a lot of the issues, particularly on the collective. I think there's a lot of challenges that need to get fixed with the collectives that are out there it is an end around right now of of the cap there's no doubt about that, there need to be save cards there. And then I think on the sports broadcasting and providing the opportunity for college football like you do for the professional sports to have those unified rights deals and grow the pie. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Sen. Cruz (TX)1:49:04 – 1:49:39

Thank you, Senator Schmidt. I also, I'm gonna ask now unanimous consent to enter into the record fourteen letters of support. uh, for senator cantwell's and my legislation, these letters consist of one hundred and thirty signatures, representing over sixty five universities, submitted by the atlantic coast conference, the american conference, the big twelve conference, conference usa, saving college sports, the president's round table on fixing college sports, duke university, kansas state university, university of louisville, university of nebraska, syracuse university, virginia tech university,

Sen. Blunt Rochester (DE)1:49:51 – 1:52:41

Thank you, Thank you, Mister Chairman and Ranking Member Cantwell, Mister Chairman and Ranking Member Cantwell, and also thank you to the panelists. and also thank you to the panelists. Um, looking at the panel before us, I noticed a very strong emphasis on high revenue football programs. So, Mister Chairman, as the committee continues uh its work on NIL legislation, Um, I think it's important that the committee also hear from experts that are representing female athletes, Olympic sports, athletes at non-revenue generating institutions, and HBCUs like Delaware State University. Um, I also want to note that I've been hearing a lot of serious concerns about the bill from student athletes and their families, uh, labor unions and civil rights organizations. As the daughter of a former student athlete, uh, my dad played basketball at Winston Salem State University. Um, he had to balance being a dad, his classes, as well as sports. He didn't have to balance some of the things that students have to balance today, like NIL and transfer portals and things like that. Um, but as the daughter of a former athlete, um, as a member of the Congressional Black Caucus, the former CEO of the Metropolitan Wilmington Urban League and a lifelong member of the NAACP, I'm taking all of these concerns very seriously. Um, my first question is uh to Mister Holzman. Um, I wanna first thank you for being here. Um, as you said, you are literally representing students of today and students of the future. So thank you for um for representing and also for being on a panel you coming from Dorchester to the United States Senate. So thank you first for for being before us. Um I as I looked at this, and also thank you to your family, uh one of the things I've heard a lot from are families who are very very concerned at this moment. Um this bill places no enforcement responsibilities with the Federal Trade Commission or State Attorneys Generals as I understand it. And instead it's largely uh leaves enforcement to student athletes themselves Student athletes should be empowered to pursue legal options if they believe their rights were violated. And I think we can all agree to that. Um, but they cannot shoulder this burden alone. Um, so, uh, my question to you, uh, Mister Holzman is, are you aware that the bill allows for attorney's fees and litigation costs to be awarded to the prevailing party meaning that the student athlete who sues if they lose they can end up on the hook for the school's legal fees and do you think other student athletes and families um are are aware of this or feel prepared or supported

Lance Holtzclaw (Witness)1:52:43 – 1:53:13

Uh thank you Miss Rochester, I appreciate that. Um the take that I would take on this is that it's a huge part of educating our student athletes and letting them know what rights and what resources they do have to use in these type of situations when they happen. And I fear that the issue that we run into a lot of times is the fact that they don't get educated nor understand and know the resources that they do have or the rights that they have until it's too late. They never know where where to go to,

Sen. Blunt Rochester (DE)1:53:10 – 1:53:10

Mm-hmm.

Lance Holtzclaw (Witness)1:53:13 – 1:53:25

who to reach out to, or what rights they have to themselves until they have to be in those type of situations and use them. So the issue that I see in that is that we do need to educate our student-athletes more about what resources are available

Sen. Blunt Rochester (DE)1:53:42 – 1:53:44

Yeah, I I can totally agree.

Lance Holtzclaw (Witness)1:53:42 – 1:53:42

Yeah.

Sen. Blunt Rochester (DE)1:53:44 – 1:54:36

I think as a student athlete, there are already responsibilities like classes, um, as well as other obligations, and that takes that takes up time and attention. And You know, one of the questions really is, do you feel confident, um, that most student athletes, like yourself or your teammates, have the experience or time or resources, um, to protect themselves from these violations? You mentioned that it's necessary to have that education. And I know even speaking to some of the parents who've reached out to me, one parent shared that, um, they were able to take their child to different schools, But they had to do it on their own dime. And a lot of folks don't have that kind of support. Do you think the majority of uh, student athletes that you talk to have the expertise or the time to protect themselves?

Lance Holtzclaw (Witness)1:54:37 – 1:55:47

The expertise part, definitely not. And that's what I speak into a lot when I say we need to educate our student athletes on again their rights and the resources that they have. Um, again, when you talk about families not having the means to be able to travel and get to all these different places on their own, it's definitely a very difficult situation to be into. Um, and I've experienced that on my own. Uh, we were limited to only a certain amount of visits that could be paid for by a university. And then any other school that you wanted to see, you had to carry out on your own dime. And in order to do that, your vision on all these different schools and your perspective on these different universities gets limited to a very small window. Um, again, that's gonna be solely on yourself and your team and your family to have to coordinate where you wanna go to and what details and on research and again, educating yourself on these different universities so you can work within these limitations uh it's hard to have to get there on your own dime but again you have to be able to work within the standards and rules and regulations and be able to figure out where you want to go to through your, previous and personal research.

Sen. Blunt Rochester (DE)1:55:47 – 1:56:24

Thank you, Mister Chairman. If you would indulge, if I could just ask one question to Mister, Mister Gee, um, and and I'll ask the question if we don't have time, he can submit for the record. But Mister Gee, Congress rarely grants antitrust exemptions and only when we believe the beneficiary will exercise the authority responsibly, and an exemption is necessary. Given the NCAA's repeated losses in antitrust lawsuits, any antitrust exemption warrants close scrutiny. So, Mister Gee, What NCAA activities do you believe truly require antitrust protections?

Gordon Gee (Witness)1:56:25 – 1:56:30

Well, I think that, um, first of all, thank you. It's wonderful to meet you. I, we haven't met before.

Sen. Blunt Rochester (DE)1:56:30 – 1:56:31

Good to meet you as well.

Gordon Gee (Witness)1:56:30 – 1:57:07

So it's, it's, it's great to, to be here with you. Um, you know, I think that, uh, the real issue for antitrust exemption is the ability to be able to, um, to, uh, uh, to collectively do our, uh, have our rights put together, you know, the whole The whole issue of course is, as I said earlier, growing the pie. And by that I mean, we have to be able to do what, what frankly what has happened with the NBA, NBA and the NFL, uh, and others. And that, that is the exemption that I think is the most important part of the antitrust activity.

Sen. Blunt Rochester (DE)1:57:08 – 1:57:25

Thank you. I I yield back and I understand, uh, also that the congressional back caucus has sent letters to the the chair and the ranking member. Um, This is just a really important issue at a very tough time. And so I hope that we take our time and get this right. Thank you and I yield back.

Sen. Cruz (TX)1:57:26 – 1:57:28

Thank you. Uh, Senator Blackburn.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)1:57:28 – 1:59:21

Thank you, Mister Chairman, thank you to each of you for being here, as you can see, there is a lot of bipartisan interest in doing something to correct this situation that seems to be running off the rails and quite frankly I think Congress's late to the game on this. I think the NCAA has really dropped the ball on this. They should have done something years ago. And as you can see from the audience behind you, I think every intern, college intern that is up here has tried to get in this room today so that they could see this. And I know that some from Tennessee are saying, " Go Vols!" and " Go Vanderbilt!" Mister Gee, they've had quite a season. We loved having you in Nashville at Vanderbilt. Uh, coach Sabian, I wanna come to you. We've heard a lot about navigating this marketplace. We're talking about a billion dollar marketplace right now that basically has no framework, no constraints, uh, Senator Cantwell and I had introduced the Hustle Act, which put in place some baseline transparency standards by requiring these agents to be registered. And we've heard from Mister Hulstclaw, sometimes you don't know what you don't know until you're too far into this, and I really appreciated your opening testimony. So, I'm glad that provision is in the Protect College Sports Act, but I'd like for you to talk a little bit about why there should be registration. why there should be transparency, why there should be disclosure requirements that would help protect the student athlete from exploitation.

Nick Saban (Witness)1:59:23 – 1:59:46

Well, we mentioned this before earlier in our testimony that I think it's imperative, uh, that student athletes, their families, you know, have protection from agents. Right now you don't have to be registered to be an agent for a college player, so anybody on the street can do it. Uh, we don't have any, um, regulation on how much they can charge. Uh, as I'm.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)1:59:46 – 1:59:47

Could their fees be capped?

Nick Saban (Witness)1:59:48 – 1:59:56

No question. Uh, I think that, you know, if you look at NFL, they're three to five percent. We have college players paying twenty percent.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)1:59:56 – 1:59:56

Yeah.

Nick Saban (Witness)1:59:57 – 2:00:44

Uh, we have agents that encourage players to get in a portal when it's really not in their best interest to get in a portal, only to try to, uh, stimulate more revenue for them. But really, for themselves with no guarantee that they're gonna get 'em more revenue. Uh, so I do think there should be regulation. I do think there should be rules. I do think they should be registered. You know, look, the NFL has a lot of really good rules. And you have to be a registered agent with the Players Association and the NFL to be able to represent players. And I think families and, um, student-athletes have the same, uh, should have the same protection in terms of the framework that we put around agents for college kids.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)2:00:43 – 2:00:57

ok that's great mister holtz-claw do you agree with what he said and i want you also to talk pardon me about the financial literacy should that be a requirement

Lance Holtzclaw (Witness)2:01:00 – 2:02:13

uh i do agree to part of what uh mister sabin is over there saying he is definitely speaking truth on to what happens in the lives of our students athletes when they have to deal with agents. Uh, agents do encourage a lot of decisions for student athletes that they have signed to their agency. And again, agents do get paid through what college athletes get paid. So them trying to influence the decisions of student athletes will influence their pay. Um, again, I think this goes back to the education piece of educating a lot of student athletes on the fact that your agent works for you and that you don't work for your agent. uh your agent is supposed to be helping you and again those ridiculous amounts of money that's being taken from a lot of these student athletes is is a disservice to the game you know and um i've had great experiences when it comes to me and uh an agent um i've also seen the bad side of other uh teammates that i've had that i've had to deal with bad agents and i've said this agent hasn't done anything for me they're taking too much money they're this they're that and there's definitely uh issue with anybody just being able to be an agent without those type of regulations i agree that there should be that

Sen. Cantwell (WA)2:02:11 – 2:02:28

ok that's great miss google i wanna come to you on the transfer portal and just have you talk for a minute about the damage that can be done not only to the school and the program but to the athlete with this constant transferring

Teresa Gould (Witness)2:02:29 – 2:03:42

yes thank you for that question and certainly while i think everybody this table you know supports freedom of movement and freedom of choice for student athletes um with guardrails in place I think there are so many consequences of what's happening right now Lance talked a little bit about how it feels to kinda jump from program to program and have lots of transition. What it does academically if I think we're going to start to see with graduation rates around transfer student athletes that our core purpose of tying college athletics to the educational mission is being lost because of this hopping around from institution to institution. It really does undermine the foundational team culture and team atmosphere, when you don't know year to year, month to month, who your teammates are going to be. And really these relationships that happen in these locker rooms are some of the richest and most transformational relationships that a student-athlete can have in their life. So I think there are academic impacts, I think there are culture impacts to teams, And I think there are mental health pressures too. When you have agents in your ear, you know, kind of pressuring you to consider other options when maybe it's not in your best interest or maybe you're happy where you are.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)2:03:43 – 2:03:45

Thank you. Thank you, Mister Chairman.

Sen. Cruz (TX)2:03:46 – 2:04:16

Thank you, Senator Blackburn, and I will note, oh, I think one of the most important parts of Senator Cantwell's and my legislation is a registry and important protections for student athletes dealing with agents and capping agent fees at five percent. Because I think particularly when you're dealing with seventeen, eighteen, nineteen year old student athletes, uh, there is right now pervasive exploitation of those student athletes. And, and one of the really important things we need to do is provide protections for those athletes. Senator Hickenlooper.

Sen. Hickenlooper (CO)2:04:19 – 2:04:20

Not sure this.

Teresa Gould (Witness)2:04:25 – 2:04:26

No, it's not, it's not.

Sen. Cruz (TX)2:04:31 – 2:04:36

I I will say for the record, that's the fastest I've seen anyone uh ascend the dais.

Sen. Hickenlooper (CO)2:04:38 – 2:06:57

You know, this is, these are difficult times, one has to take opportunities where they come. Uh Mister Chair, um uh uh Madam Ranking Member, thank you, you guys have worked, I know, hundreds of hours, thousands of hours on this and I uh recognize full well the the enormity of the challenge and the differences of opinion, and that you have uh both really done remarkable work to get to this point. Um, I think most of us would agree, I think everybody here would agree that college sports are at their best when they create opportunities for as many young people as possible. Um, it's uh it's, if you step back and look at it, uh Capturing young men and women at a young age, um, engaging them in all variety of sports is critical. Uh, uh, I've been amazed at the power of Olympics to do that as a, as a seedbed by which kids get engaged. Um, obviously Olympic and Paralympic pipelines run primarily through college sports. Um, and they play a really integral role in ensuring that the US Well, the US leads the world in medal counts. Sounds ridiculous, but it's part of our international brand. Um, uh, what differentiates us is our success as an Olympic, uh, uh, you know, uh, uh, uh, of a source of Olympic talent. Uh, the Protect College Sports Act clearly creates protections for non-revenue generating sports, but it does make them conditional on participation in a in a commercial arrangement. This means there is no guarantee that every division one school will be required to maintain their current scholarship slots and rosters, um, for that great diversity of sports that is represented, um, by the Olympics. And again, the, these are Olympic sports and, and women's sports, suppose I'm most, uh, concerned about. So, Miss Gould, I'll, I'll direct my question to you. From your perspective, is the risk of cuts and diminished opportunities uh, for college non-review and Olympic sports across division one sports, a, a real concern that needs to be addressed?

Teresa Gould (Witness)2:06:59 – 2:07:53

Thank you for that question. It absolutely is a real concern, and we saw some of the data earlier in the poster that Senator Cantwell shared. You know, look, there have been incredible amounts of cuts already to Olympic sports, women's sports, and if we don't start to put some expense controls in place, and there's more and more pressure to fund, you know, football and men's basketball, the revenue generating sports at a higher level, that money has to come from somewhere. So it's either going to come from the central campus and take funds away from general students and other campus initiatives, or it's going to be taken away from other programs within the athletic department. So I think we've seen the data. I think the threats are real. And I certainly appreciate that the bill addresses this, because it's an important issue for our country and for the student athletes that are competing in those sports.

Sen. Hickenlooper (CO)2:07:54 – 2:09:21

Oh, I appreciate that. Thank you. And uh, the statistics are s- I mean, amazing when you actually look at the the relevance that American people see for Olymp- for supporting the Olympics. Um, and this is one of those opportunities where if we don't act now, we might lose an opportunity that puts us on a, on a, on a road to a place where we don't wanna be. Um, so I look forward to working both with um, Senator Catwell and Senator Cruz on this, uh, going forward. Um, I can sneak in one more question. Um, uh, Mister Holzglaw, uh, we all want student-athlete- uh, athletes to have the opportunity to benefit from their hard work and talent. We wanna make sure that they don't get taken advantage of, and, uh, a number of people have described this a little bit. Uh, this Protect College Sports Act requires disclosure of NIL uh, compensation over six hundred dollars per year, while making sure that it, uh, protects student privacy and, and creates a, an NIL disclosure database of anonymized NIL data, to make sure that families and, and student athletes can assess fair market value, you can know what a fair decision is. Uh, so, Mister Holtzclaw, do you think greater transparency around NIL, NIL compensation would help athletes negotiate on a more level playing field, particularly those who may not have access to the same level of advisors or resources as, as some of the athletes at the bigger programs.

Lance Holtzclaw (Witness)2:09:24 – 2:09:58

Uh, thank you. Uh, again, I take this back to educating our student athletes, and I think that's really the forefront of what we need to do. Um, and that's gonna help us a lot. Uh, student athletes are going to be able to publicly be able to go out there and see different values and see if - compare and contrast to see if what they're getting and deals, details are, go along with what they think that they should be getting, or what the fair market value is out there for themselves. So that's just goes in and educates our student athletes and gives them a public platform to be able to see that visually.

Sen. Hickenlooper (CO)2:09:59 – 2:10:12

Great. Thank you very much. And I'm, I'm out of time, uh, Mister Vivek where you're you you're spared my uh question, as are all of you. I have so many questions to ask, but maybe I'll be able to come back later. Thank you all for taking the time out of your busy lives and being here. I yield back to the chair.

Sen. Cruz (TX)2:10:13 – 2:11:14

Thank you, Senator Hickenlooper, and and I will uh recognize that Olympic sports I know are particularly important in your home state of Colorado. And I think one of the really important parts of this bill is protecting Olympic sports and women's sports and non-revenue sports. One of the tragedies we're seeing right now under the status quo is it seems like, every single week, a different college is canceling women's sports, Olympic sports, non-revenue sports. If we don't act, we're gonna continue to see devastation. And I, for one, don't wanna see an Olympics where every gold medal goes to Russia and China, and Americans are not able to compete because we've devastated the preparation of our Olympics a- athletes, which is in college sports. I think that's one of the really compelling reasons for Congress to act and act in a bipartisan way. So we can all cheer on a ton of of of American golds in in in next Olympics. Senator Young.

Sen. Young (IN)2:11:17 – 2:12:03

Thank you, uh, Chairman, for holding this hearing. Uh, thank you to you and the ranking member for your incredibly hard work, members of your staff. I know it's really challenging issue and and, uh, uh, it's it's just great to, uh, uh, be here today and be part of this. The future of college sports is, uh, at a crossroads, uh, right now. We understand that. congressional action is necessary to ensure that the NIL landscape is built on clear rules, fair rules, rules that uh lead to a measure of uh predictability moving forward. We need to provide protections for our student-athletes and our universities alike, and ensure the longevity of not only college football and men's basketball,

Sen. Cruz (TX)2:11:58 – 2:11:58

Yes.

Sen. Young (IN)2:12:03 – 2:13:54

but our Olympic sports and uh our women. uh, sports as well. Without a federal framework, the legal and operational uncertainty around this space will only cause our academic institutions and our student athletes to suffer. However, with any legislation Congress contemplates, we need to do our due diligence to ensure that it's going to work as intended, hence this hearing today. In addition to many Hoosiers that are or will become student athletes, I have a diverse group of engaged stakeholders on this issue based in my home state, including the NCAA, US track and field, USA gymnastics, USA diving, and uh, just a host of top-tier universities, one of which I am I'm glad is uh represented today at the witness table. And while these stakeholders continue to review the legislation and consider how it will be effectuated in its impact on their own activities. I'm hopeful this hearing will help clarify many of these considerations. Mister Bhavakwa, thank you again for your testimony here today. Last year, the uh what we're calling the house settlement was approved in the Northern District of California, establishing a new revenue sharing structure to allow schools to provide direct financial benefits to athletes. The cap under this new structure was set at twenty point five million dollars per school for this past school year. Sir, can you speak to the revenue caps under the house settlement, whether you believe they're adequate or if they need, uh, some sort of adjustment to reflect the current reality when it comes to the revenue sharing landscape?

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)2:13:55 – 2:14:55

Uh, thanks, Senator Young. Uh, I I've been vocal and you and I have had conversations over the course of the last few years but on this particular issue over the course of the last year i think the house settlement did many good things i believe that the cap number in the house settlement is too low i believe we need to uh fix a more realistic cap and i go back to my my opening where there's this misnomer that there's a cap there is not there is no cap right now you have a cap outlined by the house settlement and then you have third party nil Unity. So again, I view it as an equation of X being the cap, Y being the NIL space equaling the total spend on compensation. I think the more dollars that can be transferred into the cap, and paid directly by universities in an incredibly transparent way, is going to help clean up the system. There is

Sen. Young (IN)2:14:55 – 2:15:12

So, uh, just to interject respectfully, uh, because our time is limited. what's the risk of maintaining artificially low revenue caps? And could there be risks of of fraud or other deceptive means of obtaining a competitive advantage?

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)2:15:11 – 2:15:54

Yeah, I mean, I think the College Sports Commission is doing as good a job as they can, but I think pushing money into that gray space of third-party collectives and NIL, that's in my opinion where most of the uncertainty and the abuse is. What I would love to see happen is establishing a realistic And if universities choo chose to exceed the cap, tying in some form of subsidy on a certain percentage of the dollars, maybe it's twenty to twenty-five cents per dollar over the cap, that you have to reinvest in Olympic and women's sports. And I think that would create not only some certainty and some stability, but I think it would help preserve the future of Olympic and women's sports. I believe the cap is too low right now,

Sen. Young (IN)2:15:55 – 2:15:55

Yes.

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)2:15:55 – 2:16:03

and as much as I admire so many provisions of the bill, I think that the the minimus amount of six hundred dollars is too low unrealistic in clogging the system.

Sen. Young (IN)2:16:04 – 2:16:30

Just uh very briefly, Mister Bhavakwa, I was encouraged but not surprised because we've spoken uh at length about this, but in your written testimony you talked about preserving the student athlete experience, how important that is to uh remember that they are students. Um, give me uh a very quick answer about how Notre Dame does that, make sure we preserve the educational for student athletes and and maybe how you think congress should tackle this question.

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)2:16:30 – 2:17:33

Well, our student athletes are just that, they are truly student athletes, they go to in-person classes on campus at Notre Dame, they're integrated with the student body. And when I talk to student athletes, regardless of the sport, whether it's football or rowing, softball, I always try to convey to them that even if you make it and play professionally, and there's such a a small percentage of of young men and women that can play professionally. But even if you make it, if you're one of those chosen few, you're still gonna be done at a young age. And if you don't have that education, if you don't have that degree, you are gonna have a very tough road ahead of you. Take advantage of this time on campus to get an education, to meet people outside of your team, outside of sports. Build those connections. Become part of the greater community of your university. Because it's those relationships, those educations that education, that academic curriculum, that's gonna help you lead a better life from the moment your sports career is over for the rest of your life, because sports ends for everybody.

Sen. Young (IN)2:17:34 – 2:17:36

Such an important message. Thank you, Chairman.

Sen. Cruz (TX)2:17:38 – 2:17:50

Thank you, Senator Young, and I I will note one of the important things I think of this bipartisan legislation is is that it it provides authority for enforcing the house settlement but it also explicitly provides

Sen. Lujan (NM)2:18:07 – 2:18:18

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Good morning, everyone. Uh, Mr. Guy, I want to take a minute to brag about some of the women's teams at the University of New Mexico. Uh, UNM women's golf has won ten.

Sen. Cruz (TX)2:18:18 – 2:18:18

Mm.

Sen. Lujan (NM)2:18:18 – 2:19:06

titles women's soccer seven conference titles women's cross country fifteen titles new mexico state university women's basketball six regular season conference titles softball six regular season conference titles volleyball eight regular season conference titles after years of absence on any tv platforms we started to see many women's sports get more coverage on television my understanding is that much of that coverage started because the conference leveraged college football rights to ensure the networks also carried these non-revenue sports. Now, the bill we're discussing today seems to focus on getting more revenue from college football. Now, Mister Guy, if uh negotiators only focus on maximizing revenue for college football, are you concerned that women's and other non-revenue sports within New Mexico and other states will fall back to where we were twenty years ago,

Gordon Gee (Witness)2:19:07 – 2:19:07

Well.

Sen. Lujan (NM)2:19:07 – 2:19:09

uh, where very few games were available on television?

Gordon Gee (Witness)2:19:09 – 2:19:26

Well, thank you, Senator. Uh, absolutely. This is one of the reasons that I'm here. Again, um, unless we grow the pie, And this is the whole point. Unless we grow the pie, we're not going to be able to sustain really positive support for women's,

Sen. Lujan (NM)2:19:26 – 2:19:26

Right.

Gordon Gee (Witness)2:19:26 – 2:20:03

and for uh Olympic sports. And that uh that is the ultimate uh centerpiece, in my view, of this legislation. It protects student athletes, it uh provides a structure that we've needed to have, but most importantly, we've lost these cases, so we have no choice but to either diminish any support for uh uh uh for any of these uh programs or we have to grow the pie. And that's what this does. And it will it will uh in my view be very positive for women's uh sports and for Olympic sports particularly.

Sen. Lujan (NM)2:20:03 – 2:20:15

Appreciate that, Mr. King. Uh, Mr. Holzclaw, uh, one of my colleagues asked you a similar question, but prior to transferring to Utah it's my understanding you played three seasons at the University of Washington and during that time you

Lance Holtzclaw (Witness)2:20:20 – 2:20:24

Uh, I played under two coaches and was recruited by a different staff there in high school.

Sen. Lujan (NM)2:20:25 – 2:20:30

Appreciate that. Now, what effect did playing under the different coaches have in your years with your experience?

Lance Holtzclaw (Witness)2:20:32 – 2:21:31

Uh, what has changed for my experience is it changed the leadership and it changed uh the culture of our program. Uh, culture of our program, it's a big toll on the success of a program and success of the relationships built through throughout that program. Um, my first, my first two years in there. The culture in there was set for a while. We had a lot of players in there that have played with each other and played under the same leadership and played under the same uh coach and staff, and culture for a long time. So coming in there, that culture was set already and things uh rolled that same way. Uh, I would say the effect of changing that often does change the trajectory and changing the leadership and the culture of a program. Um, I would say it changes how things are in the locker room. I would say, uh, it changes people's values. It changes how people move around a lot. And it can, it can disrupt the consistency of how things are run on a program.

Sen. Lujan (NM)2:21:32 – 2:22:28

I appreciate that. And, Mister Chairman, Ranking Member, um, I raise this issue because it seems to me that the market for coaches is a bit of a mess as well. And salaries keep going up, and if a coach finds a better offer somewhere, they could take a buyout from the school, or if they get fired, they get a golden parachute. And all of a sudden, taxpayers across the country are on the hook for this stuff. I mean, no offense to the coaches here, accomplished and, you know, well, the the coach that that is here, he doesn't leave programs, he just keeps winning championships. I wanna encourage more of that. And I certainly hope that when there's language in here that seems to restrict the movement of student athletes, but coaches just can't leave mid-season. I, parity is parity, fair is fair. Treatment is treatment here, and I certainly hope that that's something that we can chat about and we can work together to to make sure that we can do something in that space. Um, I'm tired of buying new jerseys for coaches in New Mexico, cuz, you know,

Lance Holtzclaw (Witness)2:22:28 – 2:22:29

Uh-huh.

Sen. Lujan (NM)2:22:28 – 2:23:07

it's only good for a season and then, you know, I I start washing cars with it and I I wanna stop doing that, I wanna keep wearing them. Um, Mister Bivacqua, a major problem in college. sports that have unregulated, uncertified college sports agents. Um, I didn't realize they existed and I've been learning a lot more about this. Now these so-called agents are exploiting college athletes and their families because they get paid for every transaction whether you're in, you're out, you, whatever it may be. There's dollars flowing there, but then there's restrictions on everyone else. I don't understand that why the student athletes are just getting bumped around, but I see a challenge here. So why is it important to have a system in place to ensure that college sports agents are registered?

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)2:23:08 – 2:24:17

Yeah, I think uh, I think it's a key provision in this bill. Uh, coach Saban said it well too, I mean, so hey, there are good agents and there are bad agents. But young men and women, seventeen, eighteen years old, who are not used to negotiating with agents, are not used to what it means to pay a fair and reasonable commission are being taken advantage of around the country. We need a database, a registry for these agents. cap on their commission to make sure these young student athletes are not being taken advantage of coach Saban also mentioned it's often the agent who starts talking about putting a particular student athlete into the portal test your market value you can get more money if you go to that school or this school with no regard for the culture of a team with no regard for where that young man or woman might academic journey. So we need to clean up that area and have a registry and rules and regulations and that cap on their commission to make sure we're protecting our student athletes. I feel incredibly strongly about that.

Sen. Lujan (NM)2:24:17 – 2:24:19

Appreciate that. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you for the time.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)2:24:19 – 2:25:26

Mr. Chairman, if I could, just for, since Senator Lujan asked about it, there is uh, doctor Gui of the section of the bill that also says on media rights that uh these non-revenue sports should be let out of comprehensive media contracts where you know, fox or espn buys the media rights but then doesn't do anything to promote the women's golf or or anything so it allows for those entities you either use those rights and promote them or you get to have them back as an institution and that i believe would really foster in this world Uh, you know, I do I think some volleyball team or golf team or some of these teams, well, look, that's an impressive record, right? And do I think that they're going to make, uh, hundreds of millions of dollars? No. But do I think they can make millions of dollars if somebody lets them go promote themselves? Yes. And so we definitely want to free, if you will, these, uh, individual teams within an institution to go pursue making their their program more successful this way.

Gordon Gee (Witness)2:25:26 – 2:25:52

Yeah, Senator, I'll just respond by saying when uh I was I was chairman of the Big Ten when we created the Big Ten network. And that was the whole purpose was to create an opportunity for all of the sports to be shown. Now I'm not uh contending that that's what we ought to do r- now, but I do believe that that started the ball rolling of many people interested in volleyball and golf and a variety of other things that had not been shown for a long time.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)2:25:52 – 2:26:32

Well, but I I Good. Good. Good. freeing schools to go these uh non-revenue sports to be able to go pursue their own media rights is also a valuable part of the section of this bill.

Gordon Gee (Witness)2:26:32 – 2:26:33

And I agree with that.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)2:26:34 – 2:26:34

Thank you.

Sen. Cruz (TX)2:26:35 – 2:28:11

And I will say this this provision saying that that if there's a comprehensive media deal, and if there's a particular sport that's not being utilized, that's not being put out to the public, that the rights revert back. uh, the, the, this was I, I think a very clever idea. It was entirely Senator Cantwell's idea, but, uh, but I thought it was very clever to expand the ability. Look, it's the father of two daughters. I, I wanna see women's sports get as much, uh, as many eyeballs, as, as much support as possible, and that's a really important piece. And I'll, I'll say additionally, Senator Lujan, um, on your very good questions you talked about the, the, the problem of, of coaches leaving, uh, and leaving during the season. And one of the provisions in this bill that's gotten a lot of attention, been widely referred to as the Lane Kiffin rule uh says that that that coaching staff that that a school cannot recruit coaching staff or hire coaching staff during the season or during the playoffs and and i gotta say it's not fair to play players if you're heading into the playoffs and suddenly right before you go into a game your coach leaves and goes to a rival that that's not fair and so what senator Cantwell and i did is adopted the role the NFL has which is you can recruit coaches, just do it in the off season. Don't do it while, while kids are playing for them. Don't pull the rug out from them in the middle of the season. I think that's a much more fair way to do it. And and that that's a lot of what what we try to do in this bill is, is find common sense rules that would protect athletes and protect the system. Uh, and let's see who Uh, Senator Curtis.

Sen. Curtis (UT)2:28:12 – 2:28:20

Thank you. Uh. Mister Holz-Clause, my colleague alluded to, you've played for a lot of different teams and this wouldn't be a good sports

Sen. Cruz (TX)2:28:17 – 2:28:17

Right.

Sen. Curtis (UT)2:28:20 – 2:28:27

hearing without a little banter so I'm kinda curious what is your favorite team? And just in case you need any help.

Lance Holtzclaw (Witness)2:28:29 – 2:28:35

I wouldn't call any team my favorite, but I do represent who I currently play for, which is the University of Utah.

Sen. Cruz (TX)2:28:33 – 2:28:34

K.

Sen. Curtis (UT)2:28:36 – 2:28:37

You, you should be in politics.

Sen. Cruz (TX)2:28:38 – 2:28:44

Okay, that that's damn diplomatic and Senator Curtis, you better be worried that he may file for for elections.

Sen. Curtis (UT)2:28:43 – 2:29:18

Oh. He looks far more comfortable in a in a uniform than he does in that suit, I'll tell you that. So, let me start with you and and kind of uh follow up on this question. In this different uh framework, you've seen different state laws, institution rules, and constant legal authority changes. So from your perspective as a student athlete, what would be the benefit of having one clear national s- framework for naming likeness, transfers eligibility athletic protections rather than asking athletes to figure out a different system depending on where they play

Lance Holtzclaw (Witness)2:29:21 – 2:29:59

i think what it does is it creates standardization and it creates regulation and kinda keeps everybody in a set standpoint of what we can and cannot do uh i feel like it makes things a little bit easier in some senses and um the way i would look at it is to look at things in a situation of eliminating the gray area a lot of times. And that uh is a big part of things that we should do when we're looking at a lot of people that don't really have the knowledge always of what they can and cannot do, and don't really know the legal frameworks of everything all the time.

Sen. Curtis (UT)2:30:00 – 2:30:32

Good, thank you. Uh, Mister Bubacar, uh, Utah will host the twenty thirty-four Olympic games. I'm sure you're aware of that. And many of the athletes who represent Team USA in those games are being developed right now through college sports in Utah. That pipeline includes skiers, runners, and a host of other athletes who rely on college programs to help them achieve their dreams. As an athletic director responsible for making real budget decisions, what signals from Congress would incentivize schools to not only preserve non-revenue sports, but expand opportunities for these athletes?

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)2:30:33 – 2:31:51

Well, Thea, thank you for that question, and I am a tremendous fan of the Olympic movement. I go back to my days at at NBC sports, uh, which has been the home of the Olympics for so long, and I've been fortunate enough to go to many Olympic games. Some of our proudest moments are ca- on campus, or when our student athletes represent our country in the Olympics. That's a moment of pride for Notre Dame. It's obviously a moment of pride for their friends and families. I think there does, uh, there does need to be real teeth in the Bill. where you are going to protect Olympic sports and the Olympic movement, because without universities maintaining and investing in their Olympic sports, there, the US Olympic movement will take a major step backwards. And I think you really, quite frankly, need to hold our feet to the fire. And if you're a university is going to invest so heavily in the sports like football, and men's and women's basketball, I do believe there needs to be a quid pro quo. where we are now going to also demand that you don't take your foot off the gas, you continue to keep those Olympic programs, because the overwhelming majority of young student athletes, uh, young men and women student athletes in this country are involved in in Olympic sports.

Sen. Curtis (UT)2:31:51 – 2:31:55

Yeah. Do you think this bill that we're looking at does that and sends those signals?

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)2:31:56 – 2:32:14

I think it sends those signals. I think, you know, as as as Senator Cruz and and Senator Cantwell said, I think the bill is a work in progress. I think it could do a stronger job, uh, a more straightforward job, a clearer job of protecting Olympic sports depending on where the the remainder of the bill heads.

Sen. Curtis (UT)2:32:14 – 2:33:04

Thank you. Coach Saban, I was moved by something you said in your written testimony. You talked about young people coming into a program needing structure, discipline, coaching, academic support and accountability, and leaving with a degree, a career, a family and a better chance to be successful in life. It reminds me of a comment by BYU head football coach, I suspect you know, Kalani Sitaki, where he said that the best part of the job is to coach great leaders. That is exactly what college athletes should be about. Those life-changing experiences are not limited to football. They also occur in everyday sports that generate no revenue and have few fans, yet transform, and yet they do transform the lives of young people. So my question is this, as Congress looks at the future framework of college athletics, what do we need to get right to ensure we not only protect, but help grow non-revenue sports?

Nick Saban (Witness)2:33:05 – 2:34:32

Yeah, well I think, um, a lot of the things that we've discussed here today, uh, are certainly imperative. I think in the future, I think if we keep going in the direction that we're going and making these huge investments in football and basketball in terms of paying players, which is going up and up and up and up, that we should change the comment from student athlete to athlete that's a student because we're gonna have professional sports teams that are sponsored by colleges and universities. I mean, that's what's gonna happen. Because we're gonna be paying the players so much. And, um, and I really think the only way to remedy this is, you know, we have competitive conferences, we have competitive teams, we have competitors involved in trying to create an advantage for themselves in every way that we can. And in college athletics, we have no like legislative branch of government that says, this is what the rules are, this is, I'm the commissioner of the NFL, and this is what you're allowed to do, this is a salary cap, this is how we draft players, this is how we create parity, this is how we create revenue so that we can maintain a level of competition in all sports, Olympic sports and women's sports as well. We don't have that in college. So we talk about conferences getting dismantled and all that, that would never happen if you had somebody that was the head of all this.

Sen. Curtis (UT)2:34:33 – 2:34:34

Thank you, I I'm

Nick Saban (Witness)2:34:33 – 2:34:52

Because right now, you know, like they say back in West Virginia, it's not about the money, it's about how much. And now everything that happens is about how much money can we create, uh, and are we actually deploying that money in the right places to maintain student athletes' well-being?

Sen. Curtis (UT)2:34:52 – 2:34:56

Regrettably, I am out of time. Uh, but thank you. Uh, very much. Um, go Utes.

Nick Saban (Witness)2:34:56 – 2:34:58

I think I've been out of time about all day.

Sen. Cruz (TX)2:35:00 – 2:35:01

Thank you, Senator Curtis. Senator Kim.

Sen. Kim (NJ)2:35:04 – 2:35:38

Thank you, Chairman. And and I'm grateful for the opportunity to have this and for the witnesses here to come out. As we're talking about this hearing and talking about protecting college sports, but the title also says supporting our student athletes. And we've talked about that a number of different ways, but what I wanna focus in on is about injuries and about recoveries in that way and just what is provided when it comes to our student athletes there. So, Mister Bhivakwa, I guess I wanna just start with you, just to get a sense of what are some of the sports in particular that have the highest uh injury burden that you see in your program?

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)2:35:38 – 2:36:05

Well, it varies. You know, all sports have uh the the ability to be injured for a young man or a young woman. You know, obviously you think about contact sports, you think about ACL tears, uh that seems to be so prevalent in so many of women's sports around the country. But I think it's a combination of what we really need to focus on. And one of the things I was incredibly encouraged about in the bill, is this emphasis on extended medical insurance.

Sen. Kim (NJ)2:36:05 – 2:36:05

Mm-hmm.

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)2:36:06 – 2:37:11

So, there has to be an emphasis on strength and conditioning, that is so important, that that transition from high school to college. Nutrition, the use of data analytics, diet, rest, all of that. It's, it's not only injuries, but it's injury prevention. you have to be focused on injury prevention and then when there are injuries, because inevitably there will be, how do you get that student athlete healthy again, not just to play a sport, but healthy again to live their lives. One of the negative consequences, in my opinion, of the transfer portal is there's not that consistency of the maturation of a young student athlete at a particular school, with particular doctors and staffs and trainers. to know that young person's journey from an eighteen year old to a twenty two year old that also helps the prevention of injuries you're surrounded by your doctors you're surrounded by your trainers you're surrounded by your counselors if you're just jumping around from school to school every year you you're starting from from ground zero

Sen. Kim (NJ)2:37:10 – 2:37:12

continuity cares what you're talking about

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)2:37:11 – 2:37:16

that you know coach saban is one of the best football coaches in in the

Sen. Kim (NJ)2:37:13 – 2:37:13

yeah

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)2:37:16 – 2:37:34

the history of the country and the mount rushmore of football coaches i think one of the other reasons he was so successful is there was such consistency at alabama for so many years not just who's your head coach who are your trainers who's your strength coach who can you go to for an opinion their doctors

Sen. Kim (NJ)2:37:34 – 2:37:48

so we're looking at you as you said injury prevention and the and strength training we're looking at the immediate response to injuries as well as the extended medical care beyond their time is that that that's sort of the continuity i guess i'd uh if

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)2:37:45 – 2:37:50

and that is and and senator kent just get on Just getting to know the person.

Sen. Kim (NJ)2:37:49 – 2:37:49

Go ahead.

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)2:37:51 – 2:38:02

Whether you're his or her academic advisor, or trainer, or nutrition coach. Getting to know the person, building a relationship with the person leads to a healthy life, and a healthy time period for them at a university.

Sen. Kim (NJ)2:38:02 – 2:38:23

Oh, I would hope all of us can agree that that's what we want. I, I guess what I'd like to just ask you kind of bluntly here is, is that being provided equally across all college sports? Or some of the higher revenue generating sports? getting more resources when it comes to injury prevention, the care, the extended medical?

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)2:38:23 – 2:39:01

Yeah, we we say at Notre Dame, listen, if you're the starting quarterback at Notre Dame or the third string outfielder, right fielder on the baseball team or the softball team, your your life is gonna be different. Whether that's the amount of attention you get, your visibility, your NIL opportunities, but there are certain things that should be non-negotiable. one of those is health nutrition safety injury prevention mental health resources academic resources whether you're a superstar or never gonna see the field those things need to be non-negotiable

Sen. Kim (NJ)2:39:01 – 2:39:33

i appreciate that uh uh you know about your institution miss gould i i guess i just wanna ask you just you know you see a wider lens here is is that something that's a guarantee everywhere what is it that we should be thinking about on it? I know in this bill I I believe that there's about sixty million dollars uh for a a fund in terms of being able to do that I'm just trying to get a sense of like, what's enough, like what do we need to do to make sure that our student-athletes across the board get fairness in terms of how they're treated when it comes to injuries in their health.

Teresa Gould (Witness)2:39:33 – 2:40:29

No, I appreciate the the emphasis um in this bill around student-athlete health and well-being, and I agree with Pete, I do think that sports medicine services and kind of holistic wellness support for student athletes is a priority across all of division one and i would hope that all of our leaders on our campuses uh make that a consistent application across all of their student athletes i think the protections that are codified in this bill are really really really important both in terms of the time on the campus and what happens post eligibility when they leave our campuses i would say that as spending and the arms race continues to spiral out of control, this becomes harder and harder for institutions that don't have resources. So I appreciate that this issue has been brought to the fore through this act, and I think it's an important one that we protect for all student athletes in all sports at all levels.

Sen. Kim (NJ)2:40:29 – 2:40:30

Good. Thank you. Uh, you're back.

Sen. Cruz (TX)2:40:31 – 2:41:43

And I thank Senator Kim for his very good questions. And and I will say one of the really important parts of this bill that Senator Cantwell and I worked hard on is is providing what i think will be landmark protections for athletes, both health and safety standards, so you don't have a kid uh with a concussion being forced to play, providing health insurance coverage for injuries across the board, men and women, for injuries or diseases that that come from playing sports, not just while they're playing but for five years after they play, uh no out of pocket expenses for those athletes that's provided bill and as you noted there's also a sixty million dollar medical trust fund that it that is provided in part for uh schools like hbcu's that that have vibrant uh athletic programs but don't necessarily have the budget to provide that health insurance coverage and so that trust fund is created there to insure that we're protecting athletes not just the superstars that are on tv everyday but but the student athletes across the board and that that's something senator catwell and i both worked hard on Um, I will note, uh, for the record that coach Saban had a pre-existing condition, uh, pre-existing commitment,

Sen. Fischer (NE)2:41:43 – 2:41:43

Mm-hmm.

Sen. Cruz (TX)2:41:43 – 2:42:09

uh, talking about health insurance, sorry, that, uh, uh, uh, he had a pre- pre-existing commitment and so Mike had one. he's gonna have to leave in a couple of moments. So I've asked senators on both sides if they had any questions specifically for coach Saban and I'm gonna recognize senator Fischer and senator Bud for one question each for coach Saban and then he's gonna have to leave. And then after that I'll recognize Senator Moreno who's next up. But Senator Fischer, you you're recognized for this question.

Sen. Fischer (NE)2:42:09 – 2:43:25

Thank you, Mister Chairman, and thank you, coach, for being here today. I have a question on scheduling. When you played Nebraska, we were a member of the Big Twelve, and though now we're a member of the Big Ten. The Protecting College Sports Act proposes changes that would have major influences on conferences. concern in particular about how a prohibition on conferences expanding applies only to the big ten and the sec and i hope this provision can continue to be discussed by this committee additionally the bill would significantly influence the scheduling of football games towards historical rather than current opponents and though nebraska has now been in the Big Ten over fifteen years, we do have very few conference members who would constitute that historic component that's defined by the bill. So, coach, can you share how else Congress could go about preserving those historic match-ups while better considering the significant conference realignment that we've seen take place over the last many decades?

Nick Saban (Witness)2:43:26 – 2:44:52

Well, thanks for the question, but, um, I've always had the opinion that conferences who historically in the past have been regional in terms of, um, how those conferences sort of operated. I think the Southeast Conference has been able to maintain that. Other conferences have not. Uh, I think it is in the best interest of student-athletes that we do have regional conferences. Uh, I do think a lot of the traditional rivalries come regionally. But I also think that I was always a proponent of everyone having to play division one schools. Like, I was always for having nine or ten SEC games and two out of conference games of division one because, you know, we talk it about trying to create more revenue. Well, in creating more revenue, you have to create better inventory that is going to interest people to watch. So, therefore, the more really good games that you have as inventory the more people are gonna watch the more revenue goes up the more we can you know protect olympic and non-revenue sports so i do think the conferences should be regional in nature but i do think we should play games of national interest i don't think it's really fair that to someone playing at usc they have to go to rutgers to play whether it's a field hockey game or a football game so i think that's crazy

Sen. Fischer (NE)2:44:54 – 2:45:04

Uh, if I could have just one follow-up question when you talk about historic uh match-ups. Could you explain to us your lack of wins against Coach Osborne's Cornhuskers?

Nick Saban (Witness)2:45:05 – 2:45:08

I will tell you a story about Coach Osborne.

Sen. Fischer (NE)2:45:06 – 2:45:06

Thank you, sir.

Nick Saban (Witness)2:45:08 – 2:45:10

You know, my first game, my fir- he's the best.

Sen. Fischer (NE)2:45:08 – 2:45:10

He's the best, isn't he? Yeah.

Nick Saban (Witness)2:45:10 – 2:45:30

My first game at Michigan State, my first game as a head coach, we played Nebraska when they were winning national championships, and he was the coach, this was nineteen ninety-five. And we got beat like fifty-six to seven. And he put his arm around me after the game and he said, " You're not as bad as you think." And we actually went six and five. So he was right.

Sen. Fischer (NE)2:45:32 – 2:45:33

Thank you, sir, very much.

Sen. Cruz (TX)2:45:33 – 2:45:37

All right. Thank you, Senator Budd, uh, very quickly for your one question, cuz we're gonna lose direction.

Sen. Budd (NC)2:45:37 – 2:46:08

Thanks, Jeremy. Um, Coach Saban, I wanna ask you about some of this legislation's provisions regarding transfer and eligibility rules. So if Congress were to prescribe rules in law for the NCAA, or any other similar body to adapt for themselves, Uh, it could make the more rule making uh needed to adapt to inevitable changes that are gonna come in college sports. It's gonna make that more difficult in the future. So how do you think coaches would adapt their approach to player development if the rules were harder to change? And would you be concerned about that reduced flexibility?

Nick Saban (Witness)2:46:09 – 2:47:30

Well, I, I, uh, you know, we talked about players transferring and having one opportunity. If they graduate, they have another opportunity. If there's extenuating circumstances, they could have an opportunity. We won't don't wanna see student-athletes get trapped in a bad situation. But I think multiple transfers, you know, affect a lot of things. It affects ability to graduate, it affects development, uh, it affects what you, what you can major in, and what you can be eligible at at the next school. So I think multiple transfers have a lot of issues, um, that are not necessarily in the best interest in terms of development, being a part of a team. You know, somebody s- mentioned you're a part of a different team. We keep asking the young man over here who's a player at Utah, you had three different coaches. We have guys transferring three times to three different schools in three years, and we act like that's not a problem. What's the difference in that? You got three different coaches then. So um, I I do think that freedom of choice is important, but I do think the combination of the transfer portal and collectives, and being able to have pay for play, that creates free agency, all the time is putting four thousand guys in a portal is not healthy for college athletics and i don't think at the end of the day it's in the best interest of young people in terms of their development

Sen. Cruz (TX)2:47:36 – 2:47:48

alright thank you and i and i and i wanna thank senator Rosen for her indulgence allowing two senators to to to jump in front of her that that was very kind coach Saban i know you have the the pre-existing commitment So, so, so thank you for that.

Nick Saban (Witness)2:47:49 – 2:48:15

Again, I wanna say thank you to everyone here, to giving me the opportunity to be here. Uh, this is a, a pleasure. College football is really, and college athletics is really important to me. Uh, as a college coach and having the opportunity for years and years and years to help young people develop, I appreciate the interest here, uh, and the effort being made in continuing to be able to have young people benefit from college athletics.

Sen. Moreno (OH)2:48:15 – 2:48:15

I watch.

Nick Saban (Witness)2:48:15 – 2:48:15

Thank you.

Sen. Cruz (TX)2:48:17 – 2:48:19

Thank you. Uh, Senator Moreno.

Sen. Moreno (OH)2:48:19 – 2:49:01

Uh, thank you for the witness for being here. Coach, we'll see you later today. Uh, the um, I have to, I have to run to a meeting, so I don't have a, uh, any time. I would just say for the record I have, uh, three concerns with the bill. Uh, it doesn't adro- address the employment issue. Uh, we have forty seven NCA division uh, teams between three divisions, twenty thousand college athletes that I think would be left behind. So that gives me grave concern. Uh, number two, I think the bill needs to be narrowed and more targeted, uh, as a targeted antitrust exemption. And number three, and most importantly, it does nothing about protecting, uh, biological women from competing with men in sports. So, I'll leave my comments to that, but those are three grave concerns that I have about the bill going forward. Thank you.

Sen. Cruz (TX)2:49:03 – 2:49:04

Thank you. Senator Rosen.

Sen. Rosen (NV)2:49:05 – 2:49:10

Thank you, Chairman Cruz, Ranking Member Cantwell. I really appreciate this. I'm grateful for you.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)2:49:09 – 2:49:11

Thank you for your indulgence. Thank you.

Sen. Rosen (NV)2:49:11 – 2:49:11

Thank you.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)2:49:11 – 2:49:12

Thank you.

Sen. Rosen (NV)2:49:12 – 2:50:33

Um, I'm grateful for your work and all of my colleagues for their uh commitment to the conversation today I'm gonna build upon a lot of questions that have already been asked. And I think that the main issue that we're here today is we have to realize that um, our students, they're our kids, they're our future, whatever they do, and they're not a commodity. And that's the really important message we have here today. And so, I've heard from my state's universities and their leadership, including uh former Governor Sandoval who sits on the Mountain West Conference and the NCAA excuse me NCAA boards and has been leading on this issue about how the current chaotic system is unworkable and how important it is to establish stability for universities and students. And so from my understanding of the bill put forth by the chair and ranking member, the biggest challenges it takes on stem from issues present today in college football. Mm-hmm. For schools outside the power for conferences like those in nevada i'm wondering what key problems you think the protect college sports act addresses so so mr. g um as a former president of the non power force of a non power force school what do you see as the problems this bill solves for for schools like unr and unlv who don't generate revenue from football the scales of the schools in the big ten or the sec

Gordon Gee (Witness)2:50:33 – 2:51:35

yeah i i guess you're talking about that i was the president brown which is a non ivy li or which is a non at least the ivies are right now i don't think they may become but i i i think uh that for every for every part of intercollegiate athletics what what i'm really concerned about is that um what we need to do is we need to develop basic fair rules for everyone we need to make certain that uh and and i'm talking about everyone in all of these conferences i'm talking about the fact that we need to have protection for student athletes and for and and for the institutions themselves but finally and again i come back to this because i have made this point probably ad nauseum and that is that this bill allows us to grow the pie so that all the schools including those who are smaller in smaller markets so to speak that they will be able to continue to thrive uh governor sanderval and i have had a lot of conversations about this and he has

Sen. Rosen (NV)2:51:33 – 2:51:42

yeah and now he's president of unr just to make myself clear for uh uh for everyone who former governor now president of the university of colorado right now

Gordon Gee (Witness)2:51:38 – 2:51:42

yeah yeah he is yeah i i still call he has

Sen. Rosen (NV)2:51:42 – 2:51:44

we still call him governor too so

Gordon Gee (Witness)2:51:43 – 2:51:52

yeah yeah i i still call him governor but uh a good friend of mine but but uh he is in total agreement with this bill and what we're trying to accomplish right

Sen. Rosen (NV)2:51:52 – 2:51:57

i wanna stay on this topic then because schools unlock revenue if they make the college football playoffs right

Gordon Gee (Witness)2:51:57 – 2:51:57

mmm

Sen. Rosen (NV)2:51:57 – 2:52:31

it's a billion dollar a year revenue stream outside of the ncaa so according to the knight foundation ninety percent of that revenue goes to schools in the power four and notre dame while we'll always cheer for them we love to watch football uh my state's biggest schools unlv and unr have consistently missed the college football playoff and with that this revenue stream i know the world is all about likes and influencers and media and all of that and revenue streams but mister g the protect college sports act um would it help schools like unlv and unr who don't receive revenue from the college

Gordon Gee (Witness)2:52:50 – 2:53:24

Well, Well, you know, you know, first of all, first of all, this is this is an opportunity to grow um the revenue for everyone, this is this is an opportunity to grow um the revenue for everyone, as I said before, as I said before. for for everyone. And uh but but at the same time we have to recognize that there are there are institutions that are going to be uh able to play for national championships and so forth. They should be rewarded. We're we're we're not about we're not about uh leveling everything, we're about creating opportunities so that every institution, every institution is going to be able to uh to continue to be competitive in in

Sen. Rosen (NV)2:53:23 – 2:53:30

So is it a question of do our universities just become sports revenue producers or are they still universities

Gordon Gee (Witness)2:53:29 – 2:54:00

uh you know of course uh uh remember i am a university president i i think i think first of all about the academic integrity of what we're trying to trying to solve and uh and i agree with the coach who uh who talks about the fact that we need to put the word student back into student athlete again and i think that that is what we're trying to sell this bill is the last great hope to try to bring some uh, semblance of common sense to all of that, including the academic issues that we're facing.

Sen. Rosen (NV)2:54:00 – 2:54:50

Thank you. I wanna build, my colleagues have talked a lot about women's sports. It's really important. When, uh, I was a young girl, there wasn't, uh, women's sports that were organized, and so this bill really does provide essential protections for women and broad-based sports. The protections are tied to voluntary participation in media rights pooling and I'm concerned that voluntary participation may not provide enough stability or certainty to adequately protect women's and of course as people have been talking about those Olympic sports that are so important to our national character, right? So, Mister Bibacqua, um, are these bills' current protections um durable enough to protect women's sports from being cut in the long term? And what other ways can Congress enable schools to protect uh women's and sometimes non-revenue generating sports programs but um that we all love to uh, still cheer on?

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)2:54:50 – 2:55:05

No, it's a, it's a, a great question, and you know, we have twenty-six programs, thirteen men's, thirteen women's. Uh, one of the most popular sports on our campus by far is our women's basketball. You know, we sell out our

Sen. Rosen (NV)2:55:05 – 2:55:09

The ace is three time WNBA champs. Let's talk about women's basketball.

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)2:55:08 – 2:55:56

Well, well, yeah, so women's basketball you see how certain uh, women's volleyball is growing, the excitement going on right now with women's softball. You know, I go back to what I said earlier, I do think there should be a bit of a give and take. Like if you're, if you as a university make the decision to continue to invest so heavily in sports like football, and men's basketball, and women's basketball, there has to be an agreement, a a contract if you will, that you're gonna continue to invest in Olympic and women's sports. And I think that combined with title nine requirements, will hopefully keep women's sports at the college level going in the direction they're going now which I think is incredibly exciting and I think they're operating at an all-time high level of success.

Sen. Rosen (NV)2:55:56 – 2:56:09

Do you think as a follow-up Congress should consider requiring other revenue sharing agreements outside of the sports broadcasting act that could be redistributed to schools to maintain and support some of these broad based sports or women's sports?

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)2:56:10 – 2:56:57

Well I think that the you know scholarship protections the distribution scholarships, the roster limitations, and just a, an agreement that you have to continue to invest in those women's and Olympic sports. It gets back to what is NIL? What are these name, image and likeness deals? Coach Saban said it repeatedly, and I agree with him. It's really become pay for play. And I think you have to increase the cap to make it more of a revenue share, and then allow the universities to distribute that, certainly primarily to their revenue sports. You know, in our case, our main revenue sports is football first and foremost, but then men's and women's basketball. But I do think the bill starts to talk about ways to make sure that you can't go all in on just one sport at the expense of others.

Sen. Rosen (NV)2:56:57 – 2:56:58

Yeah.

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)2:56:58 – 2:57:07

Because that would lead to the disintegration of opportunities for young men and women who are participating in those Olympic sports and obviously young women in women's sports.

Sen. Rosen (NV)2:57:08 – 2:57:09

Thank you. Thank you, Mister Chair.

Sen. Cruz (TX)2:57:10 – 2:57:12

Thank you, Senator Rosen. Uh, Senator Fisher is now

Sen. Fischer (NE)2:57:15 – 2:58:21

Thank you, Mister Chairman. Mister Babakwa, uh Nebraska's really proud of our women's volleyball program, that we've won a total of five NCAA championships, we're regularly one of the top programs in that sport. In fact, Nebraska Volleyball has sold out their home arena, every match dating back to two thousand one, and even sold out Memorial Stadium for an event in twenty twenty three as we continue to explore the nil legislation it is important that these athletes maintain their nil opportunities you were just addressing much of that can you comment on how this specific piece of legislation addresses women's and olympic sports programs like nebraska's volleyball how how do you think it it would help those programs without the federal government deciding who's gonna win and who's gonna lose if they're gonna be dealing out funding.

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)2:58:22 – 3:00:06

Yeah, the the the success of women's volleyball, and I I point to Nebraska, you wouldn't you would know better than I do, but you know, eighty-one, eighty-two thousand people to watch a women's volleyball game. It's it's exciting, it's a it's a it's astounding. And I go back to what I had said, that I think there has to be a commitment. Schools are gonna pick sports. You cannot be, in this day and age, a year in and year out national championship competitor in all of your programs. It's just impossible. So you have to go back to the basics. At Notre Dame, do we wanna win national championships in football? Absolutely. Do we wanna win national championships in women's basketball? Absolutely. We start every season That's our goal for those programs and others. But, the true student athlete experience has to be more than just national championships. It has to be, you know, what are you learning, how are you developing, what's that education you're getting, what's that opportunity that you're provided. And that's why I go back to my belief that you should tie in universities, and I'll use the term again, hold our feet to the fire. That as you continue to invest in those primary sports, and they're different. Volleyball's also a big emphasis for ours right now. We have a wonderful coach and we're going in a great direction. But you can't do that. You can't be all in on certain sports at the expense of others. And I think one area where the bill can be improved is tightening that language, making that language a bit more forceful, that as you continue to put your gas on the, uh, foot on the gas on major revenue sports like football, men's and women's basketball, we are not going to allow you to take your foot off the gas. of women's sports and olympic sports.

Sen. Fischer (NE)3:00:07 – 3:00:19

OK. Thank you. Um, Mister Gee, Nebraska is also home to the College uh World Series, the Men's College World Series that's coming up um in just a a week or so now.

Gordon Gee (Witness)3:00:14 – 3:00:14

Yes.

Sen. Fischer (NE)3:00:20 – 3:00:47

Last year that College World Series brought nearly one hundred fifty million dollars in economic benefit to the city of Omaha. So as we consider this n i l legislation how can congress ensure that we're protecting some of these really uh cherished traditions that we have whether it's the college world series or it's basketball's march madness

Gordon Gee (Witness)3:00:48 – 3:00:54

well i really appreciate but but i i've seen the seen the uh stadium in omaha i'm actually hopeful that

Sen. Fischer (NE)3:00:53 – 3:00:54

isn't it

Gordon Gee (Witness)3:00:55 – 3:01:45

uh the west virginia team is going to be there this year you know we have fingers crossed and uh i spoke uh gave the keynote address at the uh gallup organization last year and so i was right there in the neighborhood so it was great fun i will i will tell you that um this bill i'm gonna i'm gonna come back at this again you you'll you'll think that i'm wearing uh a sandwich board that says vote for this bill but i really do believe that to answer your question that without this bill we will have chaos with this bill we'll now have an opportunity to really address the issues you're talking about. It it the bill, like any- everything else, is not perfect, but it goes so much further to solving the problems and giving a structure to solve the problems, and solve the the the traditions and and ability to be able to protect those.

Sen. Fischer (NE)3:01:44 – 3:01:53

But are are there structures within this bill that you can point to right now that would protect uh College World Series?

Gordon Gee (Witness)3:01:56 – 3:02:01

Yes. I'm I'm just looking at uh I'm just looking at uh I'm gonna ask him, isn't there a

Sen. Fischer (NE)3:02:02 – 3:02:04

No, we're not gonna let Sander Cruz.

Gordon Gee (Witness)3:02:02 – 3:02:04

Yes. Yes,

Sen. Fischer (NE)3:02:04 – 3:02:06

Is he a participant in this discussion?

Gordon Gee (Witness)3:02:04 – 3:02:07

I'm gonna let him I'm gonna let him respond, OK.

Sen. Fischer (NE)3:02:09 – 3:02:10

I can talk to him anytime.

Gordon Gee (Witness)3:02:10 – 3:02:11

I know, but I'm I'm I'm

Sen. Fischer (NE)3:02:10 – 3:02:12

I wanna hear I wanna hear your thoughts.

Gordon Gee (Witness)3:02:12 – 3:02:14

he's much more interesting than me, go ahead.

Sen. Fischer (NE)3:02:14 – 3:02:15

Oh, please.

Gordon Gee (Witness)3:02:15 – 3:02:16

No.

Sen. Fischer (NE)3:02:15 – 3:02:23

Now we're getting g off topic. Please, Sander Cruz, you are much more interesting, please tell us.

Sen. Cruz (TX)3:02:23 – 3:02:35

Well, I I I'm not gonna take Senator Fischer's time other than to say number one, you are absolutely right that Nebraska's women's volleyball is impressive as all get out and the massive crowd that came out to to watch them play was was

Gordon Gee (Witness)3:02:34 – 3:02:34

Mm.

Sen. Cruz (TX)3:02:35 – 3:02:40

really ground ba- breaking and and I think changed college sports.

Gordon Gee (Witness)3:02:37 – 3:02:40

That's good. Yeah.

Sen. Cruz (TX)3:02:40 – 3:03:23

Um, I I will say in terms of your specific questions, one of the really important provisions here is we've tied the pooling of media rights to a mandate to protect roster spots and scholarships for women's sports, for non-revenue sports, that those two are intertwined for Olympic sports because we wanna keep all of that uh fully protected and and uh uh just to be a uh a home state partisan for a minute i am particularly proud that right now we're right in the middle of the women's softball world series which is between texas and texas And and in my view, we win either way, so I'm cheering for them both and and and really happy with that. But but

Sen. Fischer (NE)3:03:23 – 3:03:23

Yeah.

Sen. Cruz (TX)3:03:23 – 3:03:26

that's an enormously important part of this bill.

Sen. Fischer (NE)3:03:26 – 3:03:27

OK. Thank you.

Gordon Gee (Witness)3:03:27 – 3:03:30

And and and he answered my question. Thank you very much.

Sen. Fischer (NE)3:03:31 – 3:03:31

Thank you, sir.

Sen. Cruz (TX)3:03:32 – 3:03:34

Uh, Senator Moran.

Sen. Moran (KS)3:03:34 – 3:05:58

Chairman, thank you. Um. And I thank our witnesses for being here. Chairman, as as you and Senator Cantwell know, uh, I I should be a significant supporter of this bill. Uh, it's an effort that began with Senator Blumenthal and I and, uh, added, uh, Senator Booker. And so many of the provisions, uh, come from a draft that we introduced in twenty twenty three. And I thank you and Senator Cantwell for, uh, closing that gap that we've been unable to accomplish for a long time. And the longer this problem, uh, remains, the more damaging the circumstances going to be to the things we're talking about today. I wanna ask a couple of questions from these witnesses. One has to do with pooling rights under the agreement. Uh, and that is the Sports Broadcasting Act has allowed professional leagues to pool their media revenues and collectively negotiate media deals with the intention of increasing access to viewing live sports. But since we, Congress, enacted that act, uh, streaming has fundamentally changed, uh, the media marketplace. In Kansas, if in a professional sport, if we're trying to see the Chiefs game, if you wanna follow every Chiefs game, you need reliable broadband, smart TV, streaming device, multiple subscriptions, and it's costly and confusing. I never know. I Google now how do I watch a sports team play ball? Uh, and we have lots of places in our state that don't have broadband and access, even if the game is there. The Pro- Co- the Protect College Sports Act of twenty twenty-six would adopt this broadcasting model if seventy-five percent of the current FBS schools opt to pooling their media rights. I appreciate that it's not mandatory, but I'm worry of the consequences of adopting this broad-b- broadcast uh framework. What safeguards are in this legislation to prevent what I described as being the case that we have with the chiefs or what safeguards should be added? And I think I've phonetically spelled out your name, sir.

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)3:05:58 – 3:08:38

No, it's it's it's a tough last nap. Uh, you know, I I was encouraged in reading the bill that the provisions that related to the sports broadcasting act were voluntary and senator cruz made a point of reiterating that in his opening that it's voluntary uh i think intellectually i understand it it makes sense uh i go back to my former life at nbc sports and you know kind of combining my experience at nbc sports with my experience at notre dame i do think it could be difficult that's why i like the fact that it's voluntary uh my concern with the area of the bill is there are agreements in place, many long-term agreements, agreements the longest of which extends into the mid-twenty thirties. So unless you interrupted the major media deals across the country, nothing could really be done roughly for a decade. Conferences, Notre Dame or independent in football, we would all have to negotiate agreements prior to that date in the mid-twenty thirties. Putting on my media, former media executive hat, if I knew I was negotiating an agreement with a university in our case, or a conference for a limited amount of time, I would refer to that as a stub deal, and I think the ultimate value of the deal would go down. So I fear that many conferences and universities might take a financial step backwards before they could take a theoretical step forward, in aggregating the media rights. So that's a concern. My second concern is if you wanna truly maximize the media value around the largest sport in terms of eyeballs which is college football i do think the best way to do that is a super league and i don't i certainly don't want a super league and i'm not sure anybody necessarily wants a super league flooding the market aggregating the market bringing it to uh uh an aggregate form to major media companies i i'm not sure that's going to drive the value some say it will If you wanted to maximize media value, around college football, I think you would take twenty four to thirty teams, create unbelievably competitive scheduling, where a team like Notre Dame would play Alabama, Georgia, Penn State, Ohio State, Michigan, and start to get a number that more closely resembles an NFL number. I could be right, I could be wrong, but that's why I was encouraged that it's a voluntary application, and that a lot more work could be done over the course of the next series of years to see if the value could prove itself out.

Sen. Moran (KS)3:08:39 – 3:09:08

uh let me see if i can summarize so i understand what you're saying the way i would take what you said is that this is a few years out so we have some time cause there's contracts already in place to figure this out it is voluntary but there is still concern that the outcome of those voluntary decisions may not end up with the best result that there is that more more needs to be done between now and the time you're then shopping for, uh, the television market.

Sen. Sullivan (AK)3:09:09 – 3:09:09

Correct.

Sen. Moran (KS)3:09:10 – 3:10:19

Uh, it, this, this topic has been raised, the subcommittee that I used to chair in this committee had responsibility for amateur sports. That's why we got engaged in, in, uh, NIL and it also has, uh, has authority over, uh, the US Olympics. And, uh, I think there's a lot to be concerned about here, and you can, uh, assuage my concerns. about what we do for a we we've mentioned a couple of sports in which we talk about the Olympics, but there's a whole array of Olympic sports that I'm worried about, uh, training the next generation of Americans who compete on the global stage at the Olympics. Um. The, I guess, what what priorities would you suggest beyond what's in this bill, if I want to be a champion of the future of the US Olympics and their athletes, what provisions should I be worried about that's in the bill, or that should be, I know, I think most of you are here as advocates for this bill, I understand that, but what, what else could be done that would protect what I'm concerned about? Uh, maybe you, Ms. Gould,

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)3:10:18 – 3:10:19

Mike. Oh, sorry.

Sen. Moran (KS)3:10:19 – 3:10:20

or about, that'd be fine.

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)3:10:21 – 3:10:43

No, I'll I'll start and then and then Teresa, please. I don't I don't necessarily in my reading of the bill think there are provisions in the current draft that are detrimental to the future of Olympic sports. I do think working together with all of you and leaders in the college space, we can add provisions that are more advantageous to securing the future of Olympic sports.

Sen. Moran (KS)3:10:45 – 3:10:46

Anyone else?

Teresa Gould (Witness)3:10:47 – 3:11:28

Yeah, I might just answer it at a macro level, because while women's sports and Olympic sports are not explicitly called out in every provision of this bill What this bill provides is more certainty than we have today. So if you're a university president, trying to make decisions about funding for an athletic department, if you're an athletic director, if you're a conference commissioner who's constantly getting reduced distributions because of litigation, this creates more certainty. And to me, more certainty allows the leaders in our industry to make the appropriate decisions to fund broad-based programs.

Sen. Moran (KS)3:11:29 – 3:11:42

Ms. Gould, let me summarize what I think you said, is there's problems today in colleges and universities being the training ground for Olympic athletes. But if we have more certainty, we may be able to do it better than what we're doing it today.

Teresa Gould (Witness)3:11:42 – 3:11:43

Correct.

Sen. Moran (KS)3:11:43 – 3:11:44

OK. Thank you.

Sen. Cruz (TX)3:11:46 – 3:12:24

Thank you. And I will say, Senator Moran's very helpful questioning, um, on the questions you raised. sports broadcasting provisions in this are as mister emphasized entirely voluntary and any school or conference can choose whether to participate or not so it creates a new avenue it's our hope that that will substantially grow the revenue that is available for all the programs if it doesn't they won't choose to do it and and and nobody is being forced to do anything and i will say on the question of streaming i too am concerned about the fragmentation and how hard it is to watch games One of the things Senator Cantwell and I did is we were deliberately neutral.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)3:12:22 – 3:12:23

Soft.

Sen. Cruz (TX)3:12:24 – 3:12:54

We took the same language from the Sports Broadcasting Act about sponsored telecasts. So there is ongoing litigation with the NFL right now about the extent to which that covers streaming or not. And and we're deliberately neutral on that. Uh, we did not wanna piss off the NFL. We didn't wanna engage in that at all. So we just said, look, what, whatever, by using the same language, whatever the standard is for the NFL will be the standard for college football as well. And that that seemed to be the prudent decision not to not to poke a hornet's nest but

Sen. Moran (KS)3:12:54 – 3:12:56

not making a decision whether that's the right statement

Sen. Cruz (TX)3:12:56 – 3:13:14

right right we're we're just we're we're saying nothing about that and finally i will say on women's sports another provision that is important in this is a requirement of parity for championship facilities and training facilities and gyms for men and women and that's that's in the bill to require parity there uh senator bud

Sen. Cantwell (WA)3:13:15 – 3:13:18

can i just clarify one thing there is a provision that says it

Sen. Cruz (TX)3:13:20 – 3:13:21

Yes, yes.

Sen. Moran (KS)3:13:20 – 3:13:20

Right.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)3:13:21 – 3:13:26

So, it it will be available locally in your community.

Sen. Moran (KS)3:13:26 – 3:13:29

Is that different than the professional sports act?

Sen. Cruz (TX)3:13:30 – 3:13:30

Yes.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)3:13:31 – 3:13:50

It it's making the requirement so that we we are seeing an advent of streaming media companies trying to put professional games behind a paywall. And that is frustrating, a lot of people, the the provision of the bill says that you, even if you do that that game has to be locally available to that community,

Sen. Cruz (TX)3:13:50 – 3:13:50

For free.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)3:13:50 – 3:13:52

without being behind a paywall.

Sen. Budd (NC)3:13:53 – 3:13:54

Yes.

Sen. Moran (KS)3:13:54 – 3:14:02

Senator Zahar, while I understand this is a provision you particularly were interested in being in the bill and I look forward to making sure that I feel comfortable with you and your work in this.

Sen. Cantwell (WA)3:14:01 – 3:14:06

Thank you for your, thank you for your past leadership on this issue, it has been a long, long time.

Sen. Cruz (TX)3:14:06 – 3:14:22

Yeah, and, and I will likewise commend Senator Moran has been a leader on this issue for a long, long time. You and I have spent a lot of time talking about this and I'm, I'm grateful for your you've been really integral bringing together the the bipartisan coalition behind solving these problems. Uh, Senator Bud.

Sen. Budd (NC)3:14:22 – 3:15:20

Yeah. Thank you, Chairman Cruz, and thank you, ranking member Cantwell, both for your efforts and dedication in supporting both student athletes and programs alike. The bipartisan legislation we're here to discuss, it's a very thoughtful compromise, but it's incumbent on us and the members of this committee to reach an agreement that ensures that we don't have to come back to this committee room in a in a few years just to keep up with, I know, what's gonna be an ever-changing landscape. And my home state of North Carolina, uh, our institutions of higher education help prepare many of our next generation, gives them tools and skills, uh, to keep our state the number one workforce. There's no doubt that college athletics, both directly and indirectly, play a role in attracting and keeping students enrolled in school and making North Carolina home after they graduate. But, Mister Geed, I know you're a West Virginian, I'm married to a West Virginian, Appreciate your service there to that great state. Uh, I will lament that she is a a proud alum of the Thundering Herd though.

Gordon Gee (Witness)3:15:20 – 3:15:21

Uh-huh.

Sen. Budd (NC)3:15:21 – 3:15:21

So.

Gordon Gee (Witness)3:15:21 – 3:15:26

Well, I call myself a uh, the Thundering Mountaineers when I'm being ecumenical. OK.

Sen. Budd (NC)3:15:26 – 3:15:28

When you're over towards Huntington, I understand.

Gordon Gee (Witness)3:15:27 – 3:15:28

Right. Yeah.

Sen. Budd (NC)3:15:28 – 3:15:53

Um, uh, President Gee, you you mentioned that this legislation, it solves the financial crisis crisis that a lot of universities are facing. And I know that institutions with athletic programs of all shapes and sizes, they're struggling to stay afloat. So how would an increase in revenue stabilize athletic departments and help academic institutions fulfill their educational mission in the face of a potential enrollment cliff?

Gordon Gee (Witness)3:15:53 – 3:16:41

Uh, yeah, absolutely. Um, critical to um to the very issues that you've raised, first of all, uh, we know that most institutions in terms of athletics are already uh losing a lot of money, uh five billion dollars overall, as I mentioned earlier. and so by by increasing the pie we provide an opportunity for people to at least have a chance to maintain their athletic program without and and i've heard this from everyone here and we've heard it from a number of uh the questions if we don't do this it's going to start to really uh have a choice of we're either going to support athletics or we're going to have to close them down in order to be able to to sustain the university. I mean, it's that simple.

Sen. Budd (NC)3:16:41 – 3:16:42

Mm-hmm.

Gordon Gee (Witness)3:16:42 – 3:17:14

You know, and and on top of it, universities themselves are having tremendous challenges. We've got the enrollment cliff, we have students uh in your own state, about ten percent fewer students actually opting out to go to college. So all of those issues mean that this act really helps us to stabilize something that is so enormously important to our institutions. But at the same time, uh, it does not uh, does not deteriorate what is happening on the academic side of the uh uh of the university.

Sen. Budd (NC)3:17:15 – 3:17:43

Thank you, sir. Um, you may have answered a piece of this, but we'll elaborate a little bit more. So would the bills title one antitrust protections that allow for the enforcement of transfer rules, and third-party pay for uh pay for play arrangements, um, would that be sufficient to stabilize the growing amount that schools feel they need to direct towards a roster of revenue sports in order to keep up and with the introduction of enforceable rules create more stable revenue outlooks for this.

Gordon Gee (Witness)3:17:43 – 3:18:25

Well, uh, that's the whole purpose of the act absolutely is to create stability. Now, let me just say something as University President, a a former University President, I now have my First Amendment rights restored by the way, which is kind of fun, but um I uh I uh I think that universities also have to participate in this process. You can't simply grow the pie and then spend that money you've got to make certain and theresa would agree with me we've got to make certain that the universities themselves are making good choices uh so that the pie is not simply being eaten up by by growing uh by growing needs rather there is there are solid and appropriate choices being made

Sen. Budd (NC)3:18:26 – 3:18:27

thank you mr. chairman

Sen. Cruz (TX)3:18:29 – 3:18:30

thank you senator sullivan

Sen. Sullivan (AK)3:18:31 – 3:20:13

thank you mr. chairman thank you for this really important hearing for From you and um Senator Cantwell, I appreciate the witnesses being here. I'm gonna kind of um change direction just a little bit and give you a specific issue that not sure relates directly to the bill, but I just want your advice on it and I want kind of to send the message to maybe others in college football and the NCAA who are watching this hearing. I have the honor of chair, I'm the chairman of the board of visitors for the United States Naval Academy. And uh, I get to see these young men and women who inspire me, who are going on to serve as officers in the Marines in the United States Navy. You know, many Americans look at the current landscape of multi-million dollar bidding wars and feel we are losing the very soul of amateur athletics. Um, yet, the second week of December, every year, the American people get to watch the Army-Navy game. And it stands much more than just a, for a important football game and college football, it's a powerful reminder of what college sports were always meant to be. An area for character development, teamwork, leadership, where young people play for the love of the game and purpose far greater than themselves. Young men on those fields aren't looking for the highest bidder or checking the transporter. Portal. They are preparing to lead the American soldiers and Marines and sailors, and maybe risk their lives for our great nation when they graduate. I don't know, have any of you been to the Army Navy game?

Gordon Gee (Witness)3:20:13 – 3:20:14

I have.

Sen. Sullivan (AK)3:20:14 – 3:21:04

OK, I think it's one of the most inspiring things in the country. And by the way, it's also a cr- incredibly powerful recruiting tool to get young men and women who are watching on TV to join our military. for almost two decades the NCAA agreed that this should be the only football game, college football game, the second week of December. That was the essentially gentleman's agreement with the Naval Academy in West Point. However, the money driving college football started to erode on that. And we started having games and now there's even talk of playoffs to compete with the Army-Navy games. So Two years ago, Mr. President, I'd like to s- uh, Mr. Chairman, I'd like to submit this for the record. I let a letter to the head of the NCAA,

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)3:21:02 – 3:21:04

With with that objection it would be admitted.

Sen. Sullivan (AK)3:21:05 – 3:23:41

the head of college football, saying, " Don't do that. That's bad for the country." I had dozens of co- uh, senators and congressmen sign this letter. They still weren't listening. So to the president's credit, he issued an executive order, uh, just a couple months ago, saying, " Hey, hold off NCAA." College football quit encroaching on this great game, America's game. You can't be that greedy and profit driven. And by the way, this is the message now to the NCAA and college football. The president of United States is now saying in an executive order, stop it. OK, I was there at the signing of this executive order. So my question to all of you is just very importantly, um, from the vantage point as leaders, how can the pure mission driven model of our service academies serve as a north star as we write this legislation to restore fair competition? How can we use the inspiring example of the Army-Navy game and members of West Point and the Naval Academy to realign modern college sports with the classic American values of duty, loyalty, sportsmanship? People love watching college football. in part because of these values. And we're losing them. And the one place that still has them is the service academies. And now even the NCAA is trying to encroach on that. I find it shameful. We're fighting back with the President's EO and this letter and probably legislation. I might have amendments to this legislation, really good legislation by the way, that preserve the Army-Navy game. But any of you who have views on this and, you know, just again, more broadly, Uh, I think these players represent the truest definition of the student athlete. Um. Uh, Mister, I I'm a, I'm a big Irish fan. Uh, but no offense even to Notre Dame. I think this is the true student athletes right here at the service academies. They uh uh operate entirely outside the NIL. By the way, it's hard to get recruits. You got a great football player, wants to join the Naval Academy. Maybe he wants to go somewhere else to get money. It's not always easy to recruit these guys now. So I'd love your thoughts on a national framework that can elevate this idea of student athletes, amateurism, that all Americans want. And that's why millions watch the Army Navy game each year. And I certainly hope the NCAA or college football, if you're watching, stop it, quit encroaching on the game.

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)3:23:42 – 3:24:12

Sure. I I would say the uh The student athletes who play all varsity sports, but you mentioned football at the Naval Academy, West Point, Air Force Academy, they're more than student athletes. I marvel at the fact of our student athletes can balance academics and athletics. I've had good friends who have played on those teams, uh, when I was growing up, and they have a whole nother level of, uh, what they need to do each and every day. Uh, it's, it's

Sen. Sullivan (AK)3:24:12 – 3:24:28

By the way, if you're a English major at West Point or annapolis you're not just an english major you're an electrical engineer you're a weapons system these guys have they all have to graduate with intense degrees in some of the nuclear engineering hardest classes yeah so you're right

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)3:24:28 – 3:24:38

no it's amazing and notre dame has a special relationship with the naval academy going back to a uh pledge that father hesburgh our our legendary president made

Sen. Sullivan (AK)3:24:33 – 3:24:39

i know it's a it's a great story

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)3:24:39 – 3:24:53

yeah coming out of you know during world war two uh you know the naval academy did so much to keep Notre Dame healthy. And you know, we play the Naval Academy every single year. We'll be playing them in Boston this year on November seventh.

Sen. Sullivan (AK)3:24:54 – 3:24:56

And by the way, I guarantee you'll sell it out.

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)3:24:56 – 3:24:58

It'll be sold out. It's a game.

Sen. Sullivan (AK)3:24:57 – 3:25:00

I hope the Naval Academy wins. No offense to the Irish.

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)3:24:59 – 3:25:29

Well, it's it's a special game, and you know, at the end of the game there's such a mutual respect. The Naval Academy comes, we go to their sideline first to listen to their alma mater. Both teams, they then come to our sideline as we play our our alma mater. So, it's a game with that we respect and admire and i've been to several army navy games and wonderful they're absolutely wonderful when you talk about scheduling i for one definitely think the window needs to be protected but i think it's a bigger issue than

Sen. Sullivan (AK)3:25:27 – 3:25:29

yeah for the army navy game

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)3:25:29 – 3:25:32

for the army navy game but it's bigger than just college football

Sen. Sullivan (AK)3:25:30 – 3:25:30

good

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)3:25:33 – 3:25:44

there's so much tension now in the media space and only so many available windows particularly with the expansion of the cfp to twelve games and maybe to twenty four games and and and

Sen. Sullivan (AK)3:25:44 – 3:25:44

yeah

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)3:25:45 – 3:26:12

next few years so i think it's a larger conversation than just college football what are other major sports what are professional sports doing that week because as the nfl and i'm a huge fan of the nfl and the nfl is a remarkable sports entity but as they start playing more games on saturdays as you go into december the number of available windows in in and major media uh partners can offer is condensed so i think that's

Gordon Gee (Witness)3:26:10 – 3:26:13

well wait just to just to

Sen. Sullivan (AK)3:26:14 – 3:26:21

my my warning and the president's executive uh executive order, it goes to the NFL too. Nobody should be encroaching on this game. That's my thing.

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)3:26:20 – 3:26:23

I would love to see that window protected.

Sen. Sullivan (AK)3:26:23 – 3:26:23

Good.

Pete Bevacqua (Witness)3:26:23 – 3:26:30

Whether the entire day can be protected, that's probably another another question and another topic of conversation.

Sen. Sullivan (AK)3:26:30 – 3:26:32

Thank you. Any other thoughts on on this topic?

Gordon Gee (Witness)3:26:32 – 3:26:40

Well, I I I would just say that um Senator, I think that uh the Army Navy game is America's game.

Sen. Sullivan (AK)3:26:40 – 3:26:41

It is.

Gordon Gee (Witness)3:26:41 – 3:26:48

And I think that we ought to preserve that, as as Pete just said, the window ought to be preserved for uh for that particular game, no matter what.

Sen. Sullivan (AK)3:26:49 – 3:26:49

Thank you.

Gordon Gee (Witness)3:26:49 – 3:26:59

And and but I just admire what the academies do. I've spent a lot of time with the academies and uh just the opportunity to see what they do uh is something that inspires all of us.

Sen. Sullivan (AK)3:27:00 – 3:27:18

Yeah, it's often referred to as the only game in America where the players on the field are getting ready to commit their lives to the people in the stands, watching. It's pretty powerful. Any other thoughts on this? Thank you, Mister Chairman.

Sen. Cruz (TX)3:27:19 – 3:28:33

Thank you, Senator Sullivan, and thank you for your uh commitment and dedication to the service academy and to the fighting men and women uh of our military. It it is inspirational. Um, I I wanna thank each of the witnesses for being here today. I think this testimony was exceptionally help helpful. And and and Mister Holskoll, I wanna I wanna say in particular, I I just wanna I think your testimony is a powerful illustration of why college sports is so important. In a conversation Senator Cantwell and I both had just a minute ago, we looked at each other and said, you know, look, you're a college student. This is a pretty intimidating place to be, and I think your testimony was extraordinary. And it may be because you're used to enormous men crashing into you that you're not scared by much. But but it really, you did, you did an exceptional job, and, and, and I i appreciate your being here i appreciate all the witnesses being here but but uh i appreciate your testimony i will i will say senators will have under the close of business on june tenth to submit questions for the record and the witnesses will have under the close of business on june twenty fourth to respond to those questions and again thank you to all the witnesses thank you to the senators uh and with that that concludes today's hearing

Sen. Sullivan (AK)3:28:33 – 3:28:34

mmm

Morning digest

Start every morning briefed on yesterday’s hearings

A free weekday email covering yesterday’s hearings and transcripts newly unlocked in the archive.

Free weekday email. Unsubscribe anytime.