Summary
Mike Lee advanced S.465 and S.1568 on 11-9 votes and approved sixteen bills en bloc after rejecting Martin Heinrich's interconnection amendment 9-11.
Catherine Cortez Masto praised the Secure Grid Act and next-generation geothermal research bill for strengthening reliability and United States innovation leadership.
Martin Heinrich urged removing 'dispatchable' from S.465 to stay technology-neutral while John Hoeven opposed it citing urgent baseload reliability needs.
Mike Lee backed the Lit Act restoring incandescent choice while Martin Heinrich condemned it for raising household costs and inviting Chinese products.
Mike Lee committed to work through recess with Catherine Cortez Masto to ready three Nevada lands bills for markup later this year.
Morning digest
Get hearings like this in your inbox
Hearing details
View on Congress.govSenate
Senate Energy and Natural Resources
33m
Members who spoke5
Transcript
Committee will come to order. Good morning to all. Today we have over twenty bills with accompanying amendments. I support all of these bills and I uh urge colleagues to join me in supporting them. Um, uh by way of a a run of show, I'm gonna give my opening statement and then recognize uh ranking member Senator Heinrich uh to give his opening statement, given the number of bills and amendments that we're gonna be voting on, and in order to accommodate other members' schedules. We've got multiple chairmen i- in this room with other, uh, committee assignments. Uh, we're gonna try to coordinate those. So, to that end, even if we're mid-opening statement the minute we've got a reporting quorum, uh, we will detour momentarily in order to cast votes. Uh, and then after both the voting and the statements have concluded, Um, I'll recognize any Senator who may wish to speak on any, uh, piece of legislation notice for today's hearing for, uh, as long as they want.
No.
OK. Uh, we, we have several bills before us today, and I wanna briefly highlight two of mine. The first is the Liberating Incandescent Technology Act. This is one that we talked about in a hearing a week or two ago. The Biden administration used federal efficiency standards. to effectively remove traditional incandescent light bulbs from store shelves. LED bulbs are a great option in many ways for millions of Americans. If consumers prefer them where they prefer them, they should buy them. They have a lot of advantages. They're efficient. They, uh, promise to last a long time. Um, but they're not necessarily right for everyone for every single use. Washington doesn't need to eliminate the alternative. The uh bill I mentioned, uh acronymed as the Lit Act, removed removes incandescent bulbs from these federal efficiency requirements, and leaves that choice where I think it belongs, where I think most Americans would like it to belong, with Americans themselves. The second bill addresses off-highway vehicle access in Capitol Reef National Park in Utah. The legislation would extend Utah's motor vehicle rules for off highway vehicles to certain roads within the park. It wouldn't just open up the park generally to OHV use, but those roads, roads that already allow cars. Um, a- and this includes portions of the Burr Trail Road, Cathedral Road, Heartnet Road, Highway twenty-four, the N- Notom, Bullfrog Road, Polk Creek Road, Oil Ranch Road, and Baker Ranch Road. Um, I s- spent a lot of uh my youth and uh adulthood in and around uh, these roads, and a number of them have deep personal meaning to me, including uh, the Burr Trail Road, named after my wife's great-great-grandfather, John Atlantic Burr. He was one of two twins, born to Mormon pioneers, who took the odd trek, uh, uh, unlike most of my pioneer ancestors, who traveled across the plains in covered wagons and hand carts to reach the Salt Lake Valley in the eighteen forties. My wife's family decided to take a boat. Leaving from New York, they sailed all the way down the Horn of South America. And then up to the Sandwich Islands, now Hawaii, then they used trade winds to go to San Francisco. They were carrying a printing press that couldn't be hauled across the plains, so they then crossed the Sierra Nevada mountains to get to Utah. It's a miracle any of them survived. In any event, John Atlantic Burr was named John Atlantic Burr because he was one of two twins, born on that voyage, one on the Atlantic side, one on the Pacific side. And uh, he has a lot of prosperity, uh, proster- uh, pros- uh, posterity today. uh, including my wife and the nine children born to, um, her, their parents. Utahns and visitors from around the world love these lands. Uh, and this bill would make it easier for them to access and enjoy more of what Capital Reef has to offer. These are both strong bills and I urge my colleagues to join me in advancing them through the committee today. Now I want to turn to an issue that this committee has spent years working on. For years, uh, members on both sides of the aisle have recognized the same problem. America knows how to build. We have the workers, we have the resources, we have the technology. What too often stands in the way is a permitting system uh, that takes too long, that costs too much, and leaves too many projects waiting years or even decades for a final answer. We once built projects, vast projects, like the Hoover Dam, the Golden Gate Bridge, and the Empire State Building in years. not decades. The cost of these delays end up getting backed, yeah, uh, backed up and then baked into the cost of goods across the entire economy, from gasoline to electricity prices to grocery and home prices. Permitting delays have made it harder for American families to make ends meet. There's no reason the United States can't keep building great things and do so in a way that respects the environment, historical interests, and other things that are important to us. For many months, Ranking Member Heinrich and I have been working with uh uh Chairman uh Shelley Moore Capito and Ranking Member Sheldon Whitehouse on the Environment and Public Works Committee to find a bipartisan agreement that can make this process work better. That work involved a lot of negotiation, compromise, and persistence by members and staff of both committees, and it involved input from members on both sides of the aisle. We've stood on the shoulders of giants, uh borrowing from other proposals that have been submitted over the years by member, many members of this committee and others. So after a a lot of negotiations, Republicans and Democrats have reached uh an agreement on a bipartisan deal. But we gotta be clear about where things stand. Uh, we negotiated in good faith, we made compromises, we accepted the deal. We're at the gold line. And now it's time for Republicans and Democrats to move forward and for us to honor the agreement that we've made together and finish the job. This, of course, is the culmination of many years of work in Congress and many months of intense negotiations. The agreement addresses some of the most persistent sources of delay and uncertainty in the federal permitting process, which ultimately, uh, when reformed, will make life more affordable for hardworking Americans. So, I, I, I want to thank, uh, Ranking Member Heinrich, uh, uh, and Chairman Capito and Ranking Member Whitehouse and their excellent teams as well as all the other members who have provided helpful input along the way. Uh, that's what's gotten us this far. Permitting reform has been discussed in Congress for a long time.
OK.
Reaching agreement on the details is considerably harder. And it appears that we have
Yes.
a quorum present and uh
Let's do it.
so let's uh let's go ahead and start voting. OK, the first the committee will be voting on eleven amendments uh by voice. Absent any objection, I ask that we proceed to a voice vote on the amendments and block. These amendments are amendment twelve A to agenda item twelve. Now, unless I indicate other otherwise, each amendment that I reference, uh, uh, will have a letter after it. The same number will correspond to the agenda item, except where I indicate otherwise. So, amendment twelve A to agenda item twelve, amendment twenty-two A, amendment twenty-three A, twenty-five A, thirty-five A, thirty-six A, forty-four A, forty-five A, forty-six A, fifty-one A, And fifty-two A.
This sounds like a session of April, probably.
Yes, well, I can't quite do that accent. That's not what this is about. This is about boundaries. Uh, but, uh, uh, the, the committee will now vote by voice and block on these amendments. All those in favor, signify by saying aye.
Aye.
Aye. Opposed, nay. The ayes appear to have it. The ayes do have it. The amendments are agreed to. Now we'll turn to a roll call vote on an amendment Uh, amendment three A to agenda item three, at the request of Senator Heinrich. Absent any objection, I'll proceed to a roll call of folk. You wanna speak first?
Yeah, just briefly. Sure. Uh, Mister Chairman, uh, I would like to offer my amendment to, uh, S four sixty five. Uh, S four sixty five, the grid power act would allow transmission providers to submit proposals to FERC. Uh, that would allow, uh, fossil fuel generators to jump those queue lines. uh generator interconnection cues have faced backlogs for years. And to FERC's credit, the commission has taken action in recent years to speed up these cues quite a bit, including issue order issuing order number twenty twenty three. Um while issues remain with generator interconnection backlogs, favoring one form of generation over others is not a smart cost saving path forward. Uh my amendment would simply remove the word dispatchable from S four sixty five, it would still allow transmission providers to speed up their generator interconnection cues, but in a generation neutral manner. Uh, there's no debate that there is room for improvement, and our generator interconnection, intergenerator generator interconnection cues. And I think actually that our bipartisan permitting package once released will show how Chairman Lee and I agree on some common sense solutions to improve these cues. But FERC, has never been in the business of picking winners and losers, and they shouldn't start today. So I would ask for a roll call vote on that amendment.
Thank you very much.
Mister Cha- Mister Chairman.
Yes, Senator Hope.
So this is an amendment uh to a bill that uh I introduced along with uh Senator Young. Uh also it's cosponsored with uh by Senators Marshall, McCormick and uh Bernie Bueno-Mareno. And uh I want to thank them for cosponsoring. Uh, essentially it's an effort to try to increase grid reliability. So I, I certainly understand, uh, and sympathize with the important point, uh, that the ranking member made. And I know in the permitting reform bill y'all are working on, you know, you're going to what he just said, making sure that everybody gets a fair shot. But we have a real issue with grid reliability. And if we don't get more base load dispatchable energy on there, we de-stabilize the grid. So ironically, the unintended consequence of continuing to put intermittent energy on ahead of dispatchable destabilizes the grid, and you're gonna get less renewable or intermittent on there, if we don't start addressing this and addressing it now. And that's really what this grid reliability bill is all about. We - we understand, recognize, and I'm a fan of all of the above, uh, energy sources, but we understand different people advocate for different types of energy, whether it's traditional fossil fuel, renewable, intermittent, all those kinds of things. I get it. But if we don't start addressing grid reliability now, we're gonna take a problem we already have and exacerbate it. And that's why I would ask for a no vote on the amendment.
Thank you. A roll call vote having been requested, the clerk will call the roll.
Mister Lee.
No.
Mister Barrasso.
No.
Mister Risch.
None.
Mister Daines.
No.
Mister Cotton.
No by proxy. No by proxy.
Mister McCormick. Mister Justice.
No.
Mister Cassidy.
No.
Miss Hyde-Smith. Miss Murkowski. Mister Hoven.
Aye.
Mister Heinrich.
Aye.
Mister Wyden.
Aye by proxy.
Miss Cantwell.
Aye by proxy.
Miss Hirono.
Aye by proxy.
Mister King.
Aye.
Miss Cortez Masto. Mister Hickenlooper.
Aye by proxy.
Mister Padilla.
Aye.
Mister Gallego.
Aye by proxy.
On this vote the yeas are nine, the nays are eleven.
Um, uh, the nays have it and the amendment is not adopt uh adopted. Now we'll turn to the roll call votes on three bills. First is agenda item three, S four sixty five, sponsored by Senator Hovind. The clerk will call the roll.
Mister Lee.
Aye.
Mister Barrasso.
Aye.
Mister Risch. Mister Daines.
Aye.
Mister Cotton.
Aye by proxy?
Mister McCormick.
Aye.
Mister Justice.
Aye.
Mister Cassidy.
Aye.
Miss Hyde-Smith.
Aye.
Miss Murkowski.
Aye.
Mister Hoven. Mister Heinrich.
No.
Mister Wyden.
No, by proxy.
Miss Canwell.
No, by proxy.
Miss Hirono.
No, by proxy.
Mister King.
No.
Miss Cortez Masto.
No.
Mister Hickenlooper.
No, by proxy.
What is this?
Mister Padilla.
No. What is this?
Mister Gallego.
No, by proxy.
On this
But uh, Senator Cantwell wished to be recorded as if in person rather than by proxy.
Yes. Thank you. No.
Thank you. On this vote the yeas are eleven, the nays are nine.
Uh, the uh, uh, the measure passes. It will be advanced to the fourth. Second is agenda item number seventeen, S fifteen s sixty eight. Uh, which I have sponsored. The clerk will call the roll.
Mister Lee.
Aye.
Mister Barrasso. Aye. Mister Rish. Aye. Mister Daines. Aye. Mister Cotton.
Aye, by proxy.
Mister McCormick. Mister Justice. Mister Cassidy.
Hyde.
Miss Hyde-Smith.
Hyde.
Miss Murkowski.
Hyde.
Mister Hoven.
Hyde.
Mister Heinrich.
No.
Mister Wyden.
No by proxy?
Miss Cantwell.
No.
Miss Hirono.
No by proxy.
Mister King.
No.
Miss Cortez Masto.
No.
Mister Hickenlooper.
No by proxy.
Mister Padilla.
No.
Mister Gallego.
No by proxy.
On this vote, the yeas are eleven, the nays are nine.
Yes, fifteen sixty eight will be reported
Mister Lee. Mister Barrasso. Mister Risch. Mister Daines. Mister Cotton.
I by proxy.
Mister McCormick. Mister Justice. Mister Cassidy. Miss Hyde-Smith. Miss Murkowski. Mister Hoven. Mister Heinrich.
No.
Mister Wyden.
No by proxy.
Miss Cantwell. Miss Hirono.
No by proxy.
Mister King.
No.
Miss Cortez Masto.
No.
Mister Hickenlooper.
No by proxy.
Mister Padilla.
No.
Mister Gallego.
No by proxy.
On this vote, the yeas are eleven, the nays are nine.
Uh, uh, the measure will be purport, uh, reported favorably to the Senate. We'll now proceed to bills as amended if amended and, uh, voice, uh, votes on bills unblocked. These bills are agenda items twelve, twenty-three, twenty-five, thirty-five, thirty-six, thirty-eight, forty-one, forty-three, f- through forty-eight. fifty-one fifty-two and fifty-four those are respectively s twelve fifty-four and the house companion hr three three one s thirty three seventy one s three five two four and the house companion hr seven six one eight s four one one six s four one six six and the house companion hr seven two five seven s four two five two s four four O six s four eight four six S four eight seven O. S five three five two. S five three five nine. S five three six O. S five three seven four. H R six seven seven. H R two three O six. And H R five seven two nine. With the committee will vote on the sixteen bills and block by voice, as amended, if amended, for the sixteen bills as a block. All those in favor say aye.
Aye. Aye.
All opposed say nay. The ayes appear to have it. The ayes, you have it.
Mister Chairman.
These sixteen bills will be reported to a related Senate.
Mister Chairman.
Yes, Senator Kielman.
Uh, may I be recorded as an aye on the Heinrich amendment?
You will be recorded as an aye on the Heinrich amendment.
Thank you. Thank you.
Thank you. Um, let's see, um, why don't we finish opening statements. We'll we'll turn now to Senator Heinrich for his opening statement. Thank you, members, for your cooperation in the votes.
Thank you, Chairman. And uh I look forward to advancing a number of bills on this agenda, including important legislation that I have offered with Senator Risch to restore economic support for much needed road and infrastructure improvements, near the Department of Energy's waste isolation pilot plant. Um, I'm also pleased that we will consider bipartisan legislation related to cyber security and the electric grid and advancing geothermal research. At a time of rising electric bills and increasing new demands on the grid, this committee should focus on lowering costs and increasing reliability. Uh, that's why I've asked to have bipartisan weatherization legislation included on the agenda for fifty years the popular weatherization program has helped add insulation repair furnaces and make other home efficiency upgrades to households who need it most we have a chance to extend and improve a program that has served more than seven million family, saving households an average of three hundred and seventy-two dollars per year, and supporting eighty-five hundred good jobs. Unfortunately, the chairman has declined to bring weatherization bills a poor vote today. Instead, uh, we are spending our time and attention liberating, quote, unquote, light bulbs that industry doesn't even make, and most of us haven't seen or thought about in a decade. Uh, according to analysis of DOE and EIA data, by consumer groups, LED light bulbs save the average household three hundred and seventy dollars a year on their electric bills. Earlier this month I submitted a letter of opposition for the record to S fifteen sixty eight the Liberating Incandescent Technology Act or the Lit Act from Industry, uh the National Electrical Manufacturers Association and the American Lighting Association warned of Chinese products flooding the market if this bill becomes law. I would now ask for unanimous support, uh, sorry, unanimous consent to submit a letter of opposition to S fifteen sixty eight from consumer groups.
With that objection.
Consumer Reports, the Consumer Fe- Federation of America, and the National Consumer Law Center urge members to vote no on S fifteen sixty eight, and protect Americans from skyrocketing energy costs. I'm also concerned about S four sixty five, the grid power act. The bill would codify queue jumping, allowing natural gas power plants to connect to the grid faster than clean energy sources. This is not necessary, as FERC approved a one-time process to allow some power plants to skip to the front of the line while remaining technologically neutral. Changing this now, especially as this administration illegally props up uneconomic coal plants, could be harmful to families and small businesses' bottom lines. So, I uh have an amendment that would keep the requirement for FERC to modify its generator interconnection procedures, but would allow transmission providers to simply prioritize, quote, new power projects that will improve grid reliability and resource adequacy, end quote. Any project, not just those favored by this administration, that improves our grid's reliability, could be expedited under this language. Additionally, I'd like to voice my concern over S twenty nine seventy, the OHV's in Capitol Reef National Park Act, which would authorize the use of off-highway vehicles inside the park. All twelve roads defined in the bill are accessible to conventional vehicles, so the idea that this bill increases access to park land is dubious. If passed, the bill would strain local emergency medical services, wear down backcountry roads faster, and push noise levels past National Park Service standards. Lastly, on the North Rim and Kaibab National Forest Restoration Act, I have filed an amendment to ensure transparency and oversight of the non-competitive contracts authorized by the bill. Uh, we have seen what happens when this administration doesn't have to go through regular competitive contracting processes. We get shoddy work, like the reflecting pool, with taxpayer money funneled to the president's donors. The last thing the communities of Northern Arizona need is for bid contracts to be awarded to fly-by-night companies that cannot get the job done at the end of the day. Uh, I know how important this restoration work is, uh, particularly to the members from Arizona, uh, so I am not going to ask, uh, t- not going to vote against the bill today, but I hope that we can put some necessary guardrails into this legislation to ensure that the work actually gets done and taxpayer dollars aren't diverted to this administration's. vanity projects. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Thanks so much, Senator Heinrich, any other senator like to recognize,
Mr. Chairman?
yes, Senator Cortez Mester.
Thank you. First, Mr. Chairman, I want to thank both you and and ranking member Heinrich for working with me and my colleague uh Senator uh Murkowski on including the bipartisan energy bills on the agenda today the the four one six six which is the secure grid act and the S four four zero six the next generation geothermal research and development act. Um, the Secure Grid Act will help states better prepare for risks to their electric grids. It will bolster annual state energy security plans to combat threats, including supply chain constraints, weather-related threats, physical grid attacks and growing energy demand. The next generation Geothermal Research and Development Act will establish a robust targeted road map to support new geothermal technologies. Nevada is currently the second largest producer of geothermal, electricity in the United States. This legislation will help Nevada and the entire United States compete globally and remain at the forefront of geothermal energy innovation and job creation. Uh, advancing these two bills is critical for securing our grid, and so I appreciate the support today. I want to take a moment though, Mister Chairman, and also talk about some lands bills from the state of Nevada. Um, uh, there were three of them that we were hoping to be on the agenda today, as you well know, and your staff. One of them was S one zero zero five, the Southern Nevada Economic Development and Conservation Act, S four six two, the Truckee Meadows Public Lands Management Act, and H R twenty three seventeen, the Northern Nevada Economic Development Conservation Act. Um, while these bills sponsored by myself, Senator Rosen, and our Congressman from Nevada, Congressman Amadei were ultimately not included on the final list of the bills that were considered today, I want to note we have been working closely with you and your staff And we hope we will have, uh, the Chairman and the ranking members, we thank the ranking member as well and his staff for working with us. We hope you, we have your support to move all three of these bills together at our next mark-up. I just wanna note that, again, I, I appreciate your, your staff have been willing to work with us, including through October, even during the recess, to get these bills in a position to really, um, move them in November, and I cannot thank you enough. Um, as you well know, Um, since Congressman Amaday's bill passed the House a few weeks ago, we have been working together to utilize the remaining time we have this Congress, since he is leaving Congress, he's retiring from Congress, to move all three of these bills. And as you know, uh, the Southern Nevada lands bill that I introduced was passed with bipartisan support out of this committee last Congress, and that's what we're looking to do. Um, in Nevada, smart federal land policy is critical to support conservation. Lowering housing costs, create jobs, responsibly plan for future growth. It's all about these bills, including Senator Rosen's Washoe bill. All three of them are important for the state of Nevada. So, Mister Chairman, one, um, I hope we can continue working on these bills and can you commit, if not a specific date, November eighteenth to a date in November that we can look to put these bills on the agenda?
Yes. Um, look, um, uh I very much wanna make that happen, you know, with, as we've discussed in the past. We've got a lot of commonalities between our states, we've got a lot of federal land, and both states have growing populations with, uh, uh, a lot of needs. And also a lot of economic challenges just related to the fact that we're sort of bounded, uh, by federal land on, on all sides.
Right.
Um, I'm, uh, uh, very anxious uh, to move this forward. Uh, uh, when we met earlier this year to talk about it, I laid out some clear objectives. I'd love to work with you on this. Um, uh, the, uh, wanna take a hard look at the, the designations, uh, in your bill, and also consider extending some of the same treatment that you've got with, uh, Sniplema, uh, to some of the other, um, uh, Western states in similar positions. Um, I'd, uh, eagerly, uh, work to get your bill ready for market. Uh, we, when we talked a few months ago, we, we agreed on some broad terms. There was a, a breakdown in communication along the way. We started hearing back from your staff again last week, and we're making really good progress. So, um, we'll, we'll commit to working, um, through the upcoming recess with you on that. I would very much like to get this marked up this year.
I appreciate that. Thank you. And for the record, I also have a statement from Senator Rosen I would like to submit. It's a similar statement of support.
Without objection. Yeah, you and, uh, Senator Rosen have worked Thank you. Senator Markowski.
Thank you, Mister Chairman, and thank you and the ranking member for - for this hearing this morning, and for being able to move a good package uh of bills out. And I wanna acknowledge and thank my friend from Nevada, Senator Cortez Mesto. We've worked on a lot of good things together and we're continuing that, uh, with two of the bills that we've been able to advance. Um, I am really excited about the next-gen geothermal research and development, and uh I I know the chairman shares enthusiasm about uh geothermal prospects and how it can play a uh a more important role in our energy conversation. Right now we've got some technologies that would allow us to access heat in places where conventional geothermal hasn't been practical and and the r- potential resource is enormous it's really There's a more technical term, but it's just cool. Um, or it's hot, I guess. Uh, hey. But, I mean, we're, we're talking about more than five thousand gigawatts of deep enhanced geothermal resource potential in the United States. And, and both of you, the chairman and the ranking member, know full well about, uh, the great potential there. So really excited about that bill, um, as well as the secure grid act, um, uh, working on that. you, Senator Cortes Masto, as well as Senator Shaheen, you know, when we're when we're talking about grid security, we need to be looking at the entire system here, not just the bulk power system. Uh, but we gotta look to the the the local distribution infrastructure that actually gets the electricity to the homes to the military installations, to the businesses. Um, and we all know we're asking more and more of of our grid demands growing and uh with all the industrial loads coming on we've just got to be doing more. So to be able to have a better framework for identifying vulnerabilities, I think is just smart and good common sense. And then the last one, um, that I'm pleased that we have been able to advance today is Earth MRI reauthorization. Thank you for this one. Been working with Senator Hickenlooper on it, um, to give us more and better information about hazard monitoring, um, but also critical minerals, geothermal resources, other subsurface resources. while we attempt to reduce the risk and the cost of exploration. It's a big deal in in my state when we see the the very significant gaps in geologic data. So we're excited about all of these. Hopefully we've got a path forward for them uh through the end of the year. And I want to just end my remarks not on these particular bills but to acknowledge the good work of of the two of you in advancing, permitting, form to the place that we are at. I know we're still awaiting text uh on this uh but certainly the framework that is out there is so good. Um and uh uh I know that in any any negotiated product, it's not a hundred percent of what anybody wants. But that's not what the legislative process is all about. It's a series of give and takes and and I think you have you have worked hard and diligently to make sure that the interests of of people around the country in very different places and very different spaces, that their interests are addressed. So whether you're from very rural Alaska or - or urban - urban New York, um, these reforms on permitting are going to be so important for the - the economic well-being, um, and just just the strength of our country. So I know we're just getting started. I know that there's gonna be tons of pot shots taken at you for leading on this bill, um, because people are gonna say you didn't do enough for me. But just remember that if we can get eighty percent, eighty five percent, think about where that places us today. So I would just remind all of us, let's focus on the good in this and not be so heavily critical on the things that we wish could have been in there, we put them on the next list for that next round of permitting reform. But my my thanks and appreciation go out to you, as well as Senator uh Capito and Senator Whitehouse. Well done.
Thanks so much, Senator H- uh, Senator Murkowski, I really appreciate it. Um, uh, I I wanna have your entire speech, particularly the end part, uh, uh, pep talk about the permitting bill, embroidered on a pillow or something, I mean, or put on a note card, I'll carry it around with me over the next uh few weeks, as we uh try to move this to the finish line. Uh, but thank you. And as I indicated earlier, where you stand on the shoulders of giants, you were one of those giants, several pieces of your legislation are in there. And of course, uh, when I joined this committee nearly sixteen years ago, I came and you were the ranking member at the time. You've been working on this stuff for a long time. You're also right, uh, geothermal is cool. I mean, the base load, dispatchable power, zero emissions, what's not to like about that? It's amazing. Technology's improving. I still love the name of your, uh, Earth MRI, Bill, although it always causes me to go down a deep dive, wondering what it would look like to put the Earth in an MRI,
Mm-hmm.
uh, how we would hold the Earth still for the exercise. Uh, how we would extract the metal, cuz apparently you can't have metal inside an MRI. It's interesting. Yeah, like a dynamic, like a magnetic,
Yeah, but it's like, no, now you got me going.
yeah, Yes. like a dynamic It could be a rotating machine. Yeah, yeah, yeah, rotated. Ruben's on it. He's he's gonna f- he's gonna figure out how to do it.
Oh, yeah. I think that was put up there, right? How well done was he?
Anybody else wanna be recognized, uh, to speak on e- anything that's come up today? If not, uh, the committee stands adjourned. Thanks to all of you, uh, for your cooperation and, uh, hard work on these issues.
Well done.
Morning digest
Start every morning briefed on yesterday’s hearings
A free weekday email covering yesterday’s hearings and transcripts newly unlocked in the archive.



