Summary
- Bryan Bedford (Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration) revealed radar replacement will slip to September 2028 and phase two needs additional $10 billion.
- Bedford reported replacing 64% of copper network, converting 402 radio sites, and exceeding fiscal 2025-2026 controller hiring targets with 11,000 certified controllers now deployed nationwide.
- Quigley pressed Bedford on withholding the congressionally approved 3.8% controller pay raise despite chronic overtime, burnout, and 65% staffing at Chicago O'Hare.
- Republicans praised the $12.5 billion modernization progress while Democrats criticized withheld controller pay, staffing shortfalls, and lack of detailed sustainment cost estimates.
- Bedford urged Congress to sustain funding for phase two modernization to avoid renewed delays, cancellations, and further strain on the overstretched controller workforce.
Morning digest
Get hearings like this in your inbox
Transcript
The uh subcommittee will come to order. Colleagues, today we welcome testimony from Brian Bedford, Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration. Administrator Bedford. As always, thank you for joining us today. Great to have you. We want a genuine partnership with you as you undertake the enormous task of modernizing our air traffic control system. I appreciate your leadership in deploying the resources this Congress has provided. The twelve and a half billion dollar infusion from the budget reconciliation package last year, combined with the resources this subcommittee has provided, has kick-started something historic, a generational rebuild of the national airspace system that has been deferred for far too long. We know this job is not easy. We are here to be a partner in the effort, even as we exercise our oversight responsibility, tracking progress against milestones as this multi-year effort unfolds. Our eye is on a common goal that benefits not just the traveling public, but the economy as a whole. If we all row in the same direction, we will build a truly modern, efficient, world-class system. Any major multi-billion dollar effort carries a certain amount of risk. Even if we encounter the occasional setback in executing something this transformative, I know we can work together to right the ship. Next-gen fell short. As we all know, this effort cannot fail. I'm pleased that our fiscal twenty-seven bill continues to provide the FAA with resources to modernize the system. The facilities and equipment funding in our bill, coupled with the reconciliation dollars, is giving the agency a strong down payment to make our aviation system the gold standard of the world. None of this works, though, without people. Hiring and retaining air traffic controllers remains one of our greatest challenges as a nation. I know your workforce plan sets real targets, twenty-two hundred new controllers this fiscal year, climbing to twenty-four hundred by fiscal twenty-eight. I'm pleased that you met your hiring targets last year, exceeding two thousand new hires, but we cannot underestimate the challenge ahead in finding the best possible controller candidates and getting them into the facilities where they are most needed. Because of this, this committee has included resources in our bill to meet your fiscal twenty-seven hiring goals, and hope that fully staffed air traffic control facilities are an attainable goal in the not too distant future. Uh, controllers are only part of the equation. The technicians, the engineers, and the specialists who install, maintain and operate this new equipment are just as essential. And I'd like to know how the FAA is building that technical workforce alongside the controller core. Air traffic control is not the only piece of this puzzle. Airport infrastructure, runways, taxiways, and the ground systems that keep aircraft moving safely is just as high a priority for members of this subcommittee than as uh for the flying public. A modernized airspace system only delivers on its promise if the airports it serves can keep pace. I look forward to hearing your thoughts on the infrastructure needs along with the technology upgrades already underway. Again, I wanna thank you, uh, Administrator Bedford, for being here and for the work you do and the work your team does every day to keep the traveling public safe. This is a big undertaking. I'm confident that with good faith and hard work on both sides, we'll get this right for the American people. That concludes my, uh, formal remarks. I now recognize the ranking member, Mr. Clyburn. for his opening comments.
Well, thank you very much, Mr. Chairman, and welcome, Administrator Bedford. I want to thank you for joining us today to examine how the FAA is advancing aviation safety. I appreciate your recent visit with me and our discussion on some of the technologies that can increase safety and efficiency in the national airspace system. Earlier this year, we discussed some of the administration's proposals to modernize the air traffic control system with secretary duffer and while modernization is a priority for both side to the aisle i'm personally concerned that staffing retention and air traffic controller pay continues to play out in the public while your focus seems to be primarily on technology upgrades system upgrades are certainly needed however modern technology cannot and my dad should not replace the faa workers needed to safely operate within the modernization environment i understand the faa is frozen ahead with twelve point five billion dollars provided in the so-called big beautiful bill but the administration has not yet laid out a detailed plan or submitted a funding request to explain how you will sustain let alone finish the effort. I expect to learn more from you today about how the FAA is is managing its resources and uh to discuss more in detail uh its plan. The committee provided ninety six million dollars in the fiscal year twenty twenty six uh bill to support the FAA's request to hire up to two thousand five hundred new air traffic controllers. You have now reduced the twenty twenty seven s target to hire only two thousand three hundred ATC's and a new ATC workforce plan changes hours and expectations for controllers. I remain concerned that these targets do not take into account challenges with uh uh uh uh academy success rates burnouts and retention issues and early retirements among our existing controller workforce. These challenges are not new but decisions on how to solve them cannot be made without the air traffic controllers workforce and their union. The FAA's twenty twenty seven budget request to fully fund uh facilities and equipment at its authorized level for FAA's Asian facilities and technologies, which I support. But we still do not have clarity on what on which systems are potentially being replaced uh with the modernization effort or how the FAA workforce will be trained on new technologies. Meanwhile, American businesses, including manufacturers, and suppliers face uncertainty and increased costs as they are left in the dark. With the constant ships and tariffs, America is losing the confidence of our partners to deliver and improve air traffic control system and cost-effective aviation manufacturing. Tens of thousands of jobs across a high-skilled manufacturing and engineering fields depend on the ability of US aircraft, manufacturers and suppliers to access global markets on fair and reliable terms. This is especially true for manufacturing in my own district and home state of South Carolina. Our aviation supply chain system requires certainty from our global partners and the trust that we can deliver state of the art transportation at our airports. This includes the modernization work already underway. Supply chain issues cannot continue to impede the on reaching our safety goals and global uh competitiveness. Mr. Chairman, It is our duty on this subcommittee to continue to help the FAA keep our skies safe. I look forward to working together to support robust investments in FAA technologies and just as importantly in its staff and the workforce pipeline. I look forward to learning more about how we can all work together to support the advancement of FAA and thank you uh, for being here today, uh, Mister Bedford. I look forward to hearing your testimony.
Thank you, Mister Clyburn. Chair now recognizes the full committee chairman, gentleman from Oklahoma, Mister Cole.
Uh, thank you very much, Chairman Womack, and thank you, Ranking Member Clyburn. Welcome, Administrator Bedford. It is genuinely a delight, uh, to see you again. And, uh, we appreciate you being here and are grateful, uh, for your continued leadership at the FAA. Um, this uh, is a genuinely excellent committee. I don't think we have any bad sub-committees quite frankly on uh, on the Appropriations Committee, but there's no question under Chairman Wolnack and Ranking Member uh, uh Clyburn this uh, and just look at the members here. I mean these are really serious members quite frankly. Uh, and they do a good job and at the end of the day they generally find a bipartisan way to get things done. So, you're gonna find a committee that's engaged and wants to be helpful to you. while uh obviously advancing the priorities of congress. Whether at the gate or on the flight deck, uh in the skies above, or just landed, your mission uh is clear, mister administrator, safety, security and efficiency. Congress is here to reinforce those key pillars and provide the investment and oversight necessary to ensure the FAA has the resources, workforce and capabilities to carry them out. When we discussed safeguarding our national supporting us aviation manufacturing overseeing drones and advancing emerging technologies i'm proud to say that this subcommittee does more than just talk about these priorities we fund them we oversee them and we work to ensure america continues to lead the world in aviation earlier this summer the house appropriations committee completed its work on the fiscal year twenty twenty seven transportation housing and urban development related agencies appropriations bill A strong measure led by Subcommittee Chairman Womack makes critical investments in the infrastructure workforce and innovation that keep Americans and our aviation system moving. I was proud to support its advancement and the work done to insure all twelve of our FY twenty-seven appropriations bills were reported out of committee. Unfortunately, we're still waiting on the Senate to move their bills so we can go to conference and finish the job and I have no doubt that uh that'll be a negotiated product coming out of that committee and i think it'll be stronger uh for the fact that we reach at some point a bipartisan agreement but we do need our friends in the senate to actually do their work so we can go to conference and begin that negotiation the men and women uh who depend on a safe modern aviation system should not be delayed because a partisan delay on the other side of the rotunda administrator bedford i don't need to tell you how important aviation is to oklahoma We're home of Tinker Air Force Base, Vance Air Force Base, and Altus Air Force Base, anchoring military uh aviation in our state. Notably, uh Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma City is home to the largest military depot in the world. And just up the road in Tulsa, the American Airlines base maintenance facility represents the largest civil air depot in America. The presence and footprint of these major installations reinforces our strong commercial aviation. and thriving general aviation community. And obviously under your supervision, Mike Monroney is one of the premier facilities in the federal government for ensuring aviation safety, for training our air traffic controllers, and frankly for doing groundbreaking research on the future of aviation. We're increasingly a hub for innovation that will define the next generation of flight, including unmanned aircraft flight. I was glad to see uh FFA and DOT break ground on the vertical takeoff and landing range this summer at Mike Monroney Aeronautical Air Center. Um, this dedicated vertiport will let the FAA and industry partners test and develop procedures for advanced air mobility aircraft. I also wanna recognize FAA's continued partnership with the Choctaw Nation. Their work under FAA's unmanned uh aircraft systems pilot programs has made Oklahoma national leader and safely integrating drones into our airspace. I believe Oklahoma is well positioned to help land on advanced air mobility uh as that industry mature, lead excuse me, on advanced air mobility as that uh industry matures. As this subcommittee continues to push for full year funding for the FAA and the rest of the Department of Transportation, safety remains our number one priority. Every decision we make uh on this bill is measured against that standard. So I look forward to to your testimony today, Mister Administrator, and I look forward to working with you and my colleagues on both sides of the aisle, to get a final bill across to finish fine before the end of the calendar year. Thank you Mister Chairman, and I yield back.
Thanks, the gentleman from Oklahoma, the uh full committee Chairman. Uh, Administrator Bedford, uh, the floor is yours. We um know that you have some prepared remarks. Your full written testimony will be included as part of the record. And I'm gonna yield the floor to you for five minutes, so you can summarize for the benefit of our subcommittee. You're recognized.
Well, thank you, Chairman Wilmack. And good morning, Ranking uh, uh, Ranking Member Clyburn and members of the committee. Thank you for the opportunity to discuss the administration's twenty two point four billion dollar fiscal twenty twenty seven budget request for the Federal Aviation Administration. But first, I'd just like to take a moment, I realize the families from flight fifty three forty two are gathering later this morning. I just wanna make sure that They understand that that's why we're here. We're here to make sure that we're doing the hard work that's necessary to prevent an accident like that from ever happening again. So I just want to remember those that were lost and let them know that they're in our thoughts and our prayers. The core mission, as you point out, Mister Chairman, uh, is to provide the safest and most efficient aerospace system in the world. That was the standard from the beginning, it remains the standard today. To meet today's demands and prepare the skies for tomorrow, on executing a rapid modernization of the national aerospace system hiring and training the best people and embedding predictive safety analytics into everything that we do demand on our airspace is skyrocketing commercial flight volumes are forecast conservatively to grow by more than forty percent through twenty twenty twenty forty six and alongside that we'll see rapid expansions in commercial space launches drone operations, and electric aircraft mobility. Yet our system today has remained reliant on obsolescent, decade-old technology, causing otherwise unavoidable delays and cancellations. Thanks to the leadership of President Trump, Secretary Duffy, and this Congress, you passed a historic twelve point five billion down payment through the Working Families Tax Cut Act. And with that, we are executing on the most ambitious modernization and delivering it in record time. Over the past year, we've replaced over sixty four percent of our legacy copper telecommunications network. We've converted over four hundred and two radio sites. Transitioned twenty two of our air traffic control towers from paper flight strips to electronic data stations. We've advanced surface movement radars at five major airports. We've deployed over one hundred surface awareness i want to recognize and thank our air modernization office for their amazing progress and continue to encourage their steady focus as we prepare for even greater deployments in fiscal twenty twenty seven our fiscal twenty twenty seven requests supplements that initial twelve and a half billion down payment with an additional one point five billion from our annual f and e budget for vital safety improvements to air traffic control infrastructure These funds will allow us to address important programs like our data communication modernization efforts, as well as funding, start, uh, to start the critical work of upgrading our automation systems, which will revolutionize how we can safely manage the growing air traffic demands for our country. The brand new air traffic control system is one of the most ambitious and critical infrastructure projects of our time. But updating obsolete and unsustainable infrastructure is only part of the mon- modernization initiative. To ensure a resilient, efficient, scalable and future-ready national airspace system, we also must modernize the traffic flow management systems, strategic planning tools, and deploy common automations with cyber-secure networks that tie it all together. We will accomplish this with four major foundational upgrades that will revolutionize how we provide air traffic services in the future. We will deploy commercially available technologies, customized for the complex requirements of the largest and most challenging aviation ecosystem in the world. These upgrades will build upon one another to reduce and minimize delays and cancellations, importantly, reduce controller workloads, and more importantly, get the flying public to their final destinations safely and reliably. Our people are our greatest asset. Air traffic controllers, technicians, safety inspectors. They're on the front lines every day, working together to ensure that tens of thousands of flights, that we manage arrive safely to their destinations. Rest assured we are addressing long-standing controller and other safety critical workforce shortages. Currently we have, over eleven thousand fully certified controllers. Deployed in our three hundred and thirteen federal facilities, with another four thousand developmental controllers. in the facility training pipeline, including nine hundred controllers who were already fully certified, but are now recertifying in the facility that they've relocated to. After meeting our fiscal twenty twenty-five hiring target of two thousand, we have also exceeded our twenty twenty-six hiring goal of twenty-two hundred additional trainees. And as you point out, our fiscal twenty-seven budget request includes an additional ninety-five million dollars to hire and train twenty-three hundred additional controllers. Hiring is critical, but it's also important that we develop and deploy modern, automated scheduling tools to improve our staffing efficiencies, and reduce the needs for chronic overtime usage. Increased staffing, lower overtime requirements, and providing our controllers with better work-life schedules. Oh, and also importantly, investing in the quality of their equipment and the facilities that we require them to work in. These are the factors that will significantly improve our controller's quality of life. Earlier this year, the FAA completed an agency-wide realignment to break down silos, enhance operational excellence, and increase transparency and accountability. Central to this strategy was the creation of an office of aviation safety management. This ma office unifies safety oversight intelligence and risk analysis that were previously spread across many separate FAA business units. We are coordinating holistic risk management strategy at the agency level now, eliminating those data silos and ensuring real-time access to agency-wide safety information and risk planning. This strengthens the agency's ability to proactively identify emerging safety trends and implement data-driven solutions. What used to take the FAA analysts months, now can be done in near real-time with significantly greater accuracy. However, there's still much to be accomplished. The administration's fiscal twenty twenty-seven budget request continues to bolster our ability to use comprehensive data integration strategies, to manage skies safely. In closing, I want to thank the forty-four thousand dedicated public servants at the FAA, for their continued hard work, and to Congress and the subcommittee for its continued bipartisan support. That initial twelve and a half billion investment, yes it's allowing us to build a solid foundation the twenty twenty seven budget request now allows us to begin necessary follow-on funding to finish phase one but let me be clear if we halt the momentum now and and don't accomplish the task associated with phase two of modernization once again we will see the system slip into higher delays higher cancellations in a less resilient airspace so i implore you let's work together to finish building the modern air
Thank you, Administrator Bedford. Um, we will now begin our question and answer period. We will stick to the five minute rule. So I would remind all of our members, uh, to confine your uh, your time w- within that five minute period. Um, we'll recognize in the order of seniority based on who was seated at the time that the subcommittee was gaveled in, and I will recognize myself to begin this period. Administrator Bedford, last year's budget reconciliation package, as we have all uh understood, had twelve and a half billion dollars, a down payment as we call it, for air traffic control modernization, funding two of its major efforts that are now underway, telecommunications upgrades and the radar replacement program. Now as of late August, our information says that sixty-three percent of the targeted legacy copper connections have been replaced with fiber five G low earth orbit connectivity and then on the radar side procurement early deployment work is now underway and and I recognize this represents real progress and wanna make sure we're getting full value for the taxpayer dollars already obligated so when do you expect the copper to fiber and wireless transition to be fully complete and when do you expect the copper to fiber and And is that timeline still on track?
Uh, yes, Mister Chairman, that timeline is not only on track, it's actually coming in to the left a little bit on our schedule. Uh, the original plan was to complete that work by December of twenty twenty seven. Uh, the line of sight that we have through our integrated master schedule now looks at, more September of twenty twenty seven.
OK. Uh, turning to radar, three billion of that twelve and a half was going to replacing up to six hundred and twelve radars by June of twenty eight. Can you give us a Quick update on where that stands. Are we having any supply chain uh, problems along the way, and uh, are we still on pace for the twenty eight deadline?
Well, I'm I'm uh, there is a little bit of bad news there, there are supply chain issues that we are wrestling with, uh, and import issues and tariffs, quite frankly. So, there are issues there that have slowed us down. We would have actually been a little faster in our progress reporting in this quarter, except we've had two units damaged in transit. Uh, so that's slowing us down. If i'm being perfectly honest with you, i think we should assume that the schedule will slip from june to september of twenty twenty eight. Um, i hope we can recover that and bring it back in, but we are encountering some challenges there.
How are you sequencing the uh prioritized work of this modernization program?
So, uh, i don't know if you guys had a chance to parse through the GAO report. It's actually it's a a wonderful document, uh, everybody on the committee to thoroughly read it um we have a couple of issues we don't necessarily concur with but we do have a advanced integrated master schedule that actually is now being run through paratons agentic ai systems and so as we now can actually look at how we might change things around to see whether or not uh in real time that will pull the schedule closer or farther away so we can it's kind of like going to your optometrist you know we can keep flipping the switches and see whether or not we get a better or a worse So, again, uh, with the advent of the agentic AI systems that we're using now, this is why I can come and tell you some of the slipping that we're seeing on radars, looks like it may put pressure, uh, on delivering that schedule. But we're talking, weeks or months, not years. Uh, and yes, we will continue to look for ways to supplement, uh, our deployment to bring that back on time.
We'll talk money for just a minute. If, if Congress does not enact another reconciliation package or supplemental for the modernization program we're talking about. It will be up to the facilities and equipment account to carry uh both the ongoing system modernization and legacy sustainment, which is is going to be essential. We can't have a gap, as it were. Uh, now we provided four billion as requested by the president for F and E in this bill. I think we had a kind of a standard of about three billion over time, but you know we've ratcheted that amount up. Um, that may be woefully insufficient to meet the resource needs uh to complete the program. So, give me your thoughts on the resourcing requirements and um whether or not FNE can handle it.
Uh, let me be clear, it can't. I mean uh the so I think one of the more underappreciated elements the modernization project is we have to build a brand new system right next to the existing obsolete system because with over eighteen million flight trajectories a year nearly a billion americans traveling every year we can't allow the current system to have any downtime so we literally have to build the brand new air traffic control system right next to the other and then synthetically shift over from old to new and i can certainly walk you through that but We're sitting here today with the knowledge that if we stop now, just building the infrastructure project itself, and fixing the people even, two of the three pillars of modernization. Gotta get the people right, gotta get the foundation of the infrastructure right, but the third issue is bringing in the technologies that will revolutionize how we can move traffic and grow capacity in this country. That's another ten billion dollar investment.
You know, I'm I'm I'm about out of time, I just wanna ask you real quickly.
Uh, of that four billion in F and E, assuming we get a bill passed, uh, Mister Chairman, um.
I've done my part.
I know you, I know you have. Um, of that four billion, ha, i- is, can you give me a percentage of what is going to legacy versus what's going to modernization? Uh, out of the four billion dollars, w- we are earmarking one point five billion to go to modernization. which will allow us to continue doing the work right now on both the the federal enterprise network system that's the new data architecture that we need to ultimately get into the cloud cyber secure uh data capacity that we need to manage the now so one and a half billion for that and to move the common automation platform forward
ok thank you mister claiborne
thank you mr. chairman i wanna change focus here little bit you close on uh mentioning safety so i'm gonna uh open my question in there uh uh in response to the uh uh tragic collision of uh american deagle flight fifty three forty two and the military aircraft of dca uh i believe the senate commerce committee in may uh uh you told them that um uh you'd implemented nineteen of the thirty three recommendations directed to faa there were fifty overall thirty three to faa now the ntsb has now reviewed uh your responses uh and as of yesterday deemed eleven uh of your uh actions uh to be unacceptable uh which uh maybe all the not that unusual however is my understanding that you sent a letter to ntsb on yesterday stating that you believe the faa has effectively addressed uh several of the recommendations including five uh that were deemed unacceptable And uh, do you intend to still work with NTSB? Uh, to incorporate their safety recommendations? The into your actions?
Uh, well, let me just clarify, of the thirty-five, they actually last night said ten of them were unacceptable. So, I don't want to undersell it. So we have ten items still out of the thirty-five recommendations that we are not eye to eye on. And yes, we will continue to work with the NTSB to find a resolution to those ten issues.
Are you saying rather than five, you have ten?
i'm saying that the ntsb had thirty five unique findings that they asked the faa to address
right
as we see there today we've addressed to their reasonable satisfaction twenty five of the thirty five and we have ten that we have not
but do you still work on those ten
we're well i think clearly we got a letter from them on the ten and now we need to dig deeper and find out what exactly about our solution they didn't like and how are we going to bridge that gap yes so we will continue to have engagement with the ntsb
well i appreciate modernization but i think all of us appreciate more uh safety issues when it comes to this
we'll have to do both
so now uh the gao reported uh yes issued a report on yesterday uh that my um problems with uh or issues i shouldn't say problems with issues with modernization according this report uh the faa has not developed a detailed plan with complete cost estimates to finish this ambitious effort and the estimates uh the faa has provided do not include government release costs or any post implementation operations and maintenance costs Uh, I do not question modernization. I'm all uh for being modern. But at this point, will the FAA develop a complete plan and present this committee uh with a fulsome look uh at the true cost of doing this job correctly?
Well, first, just to correct the record. I wanna thank the GAO. We asked them to come in and start this process. So we want transparency, we want accountability. So I am grateful. that they came in early on this process and started this effort again there is tremendously useful information in their report on just the magnitude of the problems the challenges that we face in modernization and again i think it's instructive reading for every member on the subcommittee to go through this report i've gone through it in great detail and while i do not concur with the two findings that they made we do have life cycle cost estimates for the entirety of the project and then we do have a highly integrated master work schedule which i referenced earlier so uh perhaps we need to get them back in and go through this one more time but focusing on the stuff in terms of the dollars uh you'll remember i think i wasn't here so i'm going by what i've been told when we first brought phase one of modernization we were asking for fifteen or sixteen billion dollars and that got cut back to twelve and a half billion in the working family tax cut act guess what it's costing sixteen billion dollars to do phase one and we're funding that gap out of f and e so i actually think the original cost estimates that we brought congress were pretty darn accurate we just didn't get the funding that requested and so yes the both are true we are gonna overspend the twelve and a half billion to get phase one of modernization done it's not true that we didn't have a uh correct estimate of what we thought that initial cost would be do you does that make sense
A little bit.
Well, again, I'm new to this too. So, um, but we do have a fantastic plan, we're gonna run over eleven thousand modern modernization undertakings over the next two and a half years. So, uh, the agency is working its tail off to get this done, and get it done right. The other thing that this, this report shows in great detail, is the FAA has been at this since nineteen ninety five, for over thirty years, and we spent over, uh, the report says thirty six billion dollars. unfailed modernization efforts. So, Chairman Wilmette, you're right, we've got to get this right. And I think we can do that with strong bipartisan effort. And I welcome each of you, your staff, your teams over to the FAA to the modernization office and you can see in real time what we're doing. So, open book.
Thank you. Mister Cole.
Thank you, Mister Chairman. Uh, Mister Stater-Betford, uh, your controller hiring targets are climbing toward twenty three hundred and beyond and every one of those tradees as you know has to pass through the academy in oklahoma city it's the gateway and we wanna make sure it's not a constraint on you reaching the uh targets that uh you've laid out in terms of staffing so is the minroni center appropriately resourced that is classrooms space instructors equipment uh so that we don't hit a choke point surging uh uh training for both controllers and technicians
Uh, well thank you for the question, uh, uh, Chairman Cole. Um, first, the Mike Moroney Center is a fabulous asset for the FAA, as you mentioned in your testimony, or your opening comments. So, we do more there than just train controllers. It is our logistics hub. Um, and while sometimes I can be critical, you know, there's a lot of things I look at that we do at the FAA that we don't do particularly well, that we can do better. Uh, but what I, one of the shining stars is our logistics team at the Mike Moroney Center. they've been doing theory of constraints for over a decade and and it explains something to me i think it's important for the committee to understand because it affects our budget that four billion dollars for sustainment it's actually also to replace legacy infrastructure but we haven't been able to afford to do that because the cost of the old legacy system is so extreme we're spending the majority of our budget keeping the lights turned on that technology is so obsolete i don't even know how we how we do it but the guys at the logistics center mike moroney has figured it out so those guys are fantastic classroom wise uh we're full you know so we can't put any more controllers into training than what we have now however through secretary duffy's leadership the faa has um created thirteen new uh certified training programs with local universities and colleges and those are creating new feeder streams for controllers that we can feed into our local facilities
uh again you you sort of touched on this but everyone asked it it may little bit different way but are you comfortable you have the resources to actually modernize the training center itself as you said it's old it's got lots of problems they do a great job running what they've got but at some point it it needs to change and again i know we've put a lot on your plate but uh having some idea in terms of long-term infrastructure what you need would be very helpful and how are we measuring up and helping you in that regard
well i'd i do think there is a lot of opportunity for improvement uh if i'm being fully transparent we have not looked at the curriculum for how we train a controller in over thirty years and so while we're bringing in new technologies unfortunately we're training them to do an old way of business and some of the things that we train them on for example we spend nine curriculum days training controllers how to do math to separate traffic when radar goes out But the procedure is when the radar goes out, we simply move the traffic elsewhere, you know, so there is no control, active controlling going on using math and controllers and slide rules.
Mm-hmm.
So there's nine days of wasted curriculum in my mind. So there's a awful lot of opportunity, I think, to improve uh, the delivery of training and the curriculum enrichment that we're providing our control is to make them more field-ready to go out and do the,
Mm-hmm.
or on-job training in their facilities.
i mean as as you know there's uh considerable controversy sometimes around not only how we train controllers but should we focus so much in one place i mean obviously i'm parochial local and we think that's the right way to do it so there's a common experience amongst the controllers themselves a common set of instructors curricula what have you uh what is your thinking on that uh and are you comfortable with that approach generating again ultimately the number of controllers that you need
well so in in my prior life uh you may have heard we've had pilot shortages uh so in the pilot shortage world we stopped relying on traditional uh feeder systems for us which were colleges and universities and we created our own vertical we created the largest privately owned pilot university in the country um because we wanted to be self-sufficient so i think mike maroney is similar to that but we don't rely just on one training facility. So we we we build a core that we keep busy, cuz it's highly efficient, and then we supplement with uh feeder streams from other uh these collegiate uh training programs so I think Mike Moroney is critical to have an efficient training facility but it shouldn't be the only training facility. We should continue to supplement with resources.
Uh there's a big difference between supplementing and duplicating. Uh you know and I think that's the core of the issue from standpoint here i'm just being candid with you if we're stretched to have the dollars to do what we're doing now and we are uh i don't think you know duplicating that facility someplace else and we hear that idea in the senate quite a bit uh makes much sense and can and terms of the resources we have so uh again i'm sort of out of time and running over we can have that discussion another time but uh again that's a important consideration for us So, uh, with that, Mr. Chairman, I'll yield back, but thank you again and thanks again for coming out and spending the amount of time that you spent there. It meant a lot to our delegation. I know Representative Weiss was there and, uh, just having somebody, uh, your administrative team on the ground was a huge asset to us and a big morale boost, quite frankly, to the people at the facility. So thank you.
Well, it was enlightening for me too, sir. So thank you for inviting me.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Uh, if it pleases the subcommittee, I'd like to modify the order of appearance here on the Q and A to recognize Mister Strong, who's got another commitment uh during this hour. And I told him that I thought we could uh recognize him a little bit sooner. So Mike, if you don't mind just holding fire for just a minute. So without objection
As long as you give me ten minutes, it's okay.
Yeah.
Thank you.
So without objection, Mister Strong, you're recognized for five minutes.
Thank you for the committee, I appreciate your consideration. Thank you Chairman Womack, Ranking Member Clyburn for convening this hearing today. Administrator Bedford, thank you for being here. My district in North Alabama is home to the Port of Huntsville, a unique multimodal complex that includes Huntsville International Airport. Uh, the Huntsville Airport integrates air, cargo, rail, highway connectivity to support critical supply chain for our national security and economic growth, and is the only FAA licensed commercial space entry site in the United States. Administrator Bedford, multimodal port strengthen our domestic supply chain and provide more reliable and efficient movement of critical goods and materials across our country. When the FAA evaluates infrastructure needs at an airport like Huntsville International, how does it account for its broader role as a part of a multimodal freight network, uh, supporting our defense industrial base and critical domestic supply chains?
Uh, thank you for the question, sir. The the It it's a actually a fairly laborious process. We're looking for airspace complexity, we're looking for the amount of demand uh that's on the system. We're looking for other ancillary effects uh, you know, to determine whether the infrastructure is appropriately sized for the the market requirements.
Thank you. Building on that, Huntsville International Airport has consistently been recognized as one of the top small airports in the country, serving a fast-growing region with over one point four seven million passengers annually. and has the second longest runway in the southeast united states. Administrator Bedford, how is the FAA ensuring small and mid-sized airports have the resources they need to keep pace with rapid growth and increasing demand?
Uh, well, again, through the the uh AIP programs and AIG programs, we have a essentially through the budgeting process a pot of money that we are allocating to small and medium size otherwise larger airports frankly would just crowd them out in terms of So, I think there's a very, um, considerate look to make sure that we're supporting our small and medium sized airports, uh, in keeping them healthy.
Mm-hmm.
Um, of course you can do more with more. Uh, so there's a, there's a lot of demand on those infrastructure dollars and not enough of them to go around.
Thank you. Does the FAA current uh, does its current funding criteria adequately account for growth when determining where resources are allocated?
i'm i'm not gonna say we can't do a better job cause i think there are you know we should always be striving to look for better ways to use data uh we do have very good uh information in terms of current demand and one year out demand we don't have great insight into demand much farther down the road
thank you airports need certainty in the federal approval process to plan and deliver major uh capital improvements but i've heard concerns that federal reviews can sometimes take longer than the construction itself. What is the FAA doing to improve its review and approval process, and eliminate unnecessary delays in airport infrastructure products or projects?
Yeah, so uh, of course, NEPA and other environmental reviews are a popular topic. Um, we're concerned about them as well. We're concerned about the time that it takes to to do anything in the national aviation system. No matter where we fly, there's somebody beneath those airplanes and that that those airplanes unfortunately even though they create less noise today than they did ten years ago twenty years ago thirty years ago they're not noise free and so as we try to increase capacity and drive more efficiency meaning the meaning the constraint is the runway
yeah
it shouldn't be the airspace we can create greater efficiency but as we do that we're moving noise around and that obviously creates challenges for us in terms of the timeline that it takes to effect those changes.
Thank you. The Department of Transportation said it expects FAA licensed launches and re-entries to reach ten thousand annually by twenty thirty five. Uh, I commend the administration's focus on strengthening American's uh leadership in commercial space and ensuring our regulatory and transportation infrastructure keeps pace with the in- industry's rapid growth. The FY twenty twenty seven third appropriations bill provides additional funding and hiring authority to accommodate increased commercial space operations. Given the increased uh support and engagement from both Congress and the President, can you speak to the current average time to process a launch or re-entry license, and how the new DOT Space Task Force will play a role in breaking down regulatory and operational barriers facing facing the commercial space industry?
Well, if I'm being perfectly honest, sir, we're behind. uh we should have been hiring five years ago in order to fill these positions to manage the the tempo and cadence of the launch request that we're seeing today uh so i would say while it's moving at about two x the speed it was moving two years ago it's still probably too slow for spacex and blue origin and companies like that i don't know that we'll ever be unless we get same day service i don't know that we'll ever be as fast as they want us to be but the overarching issue is maintaining safety I mean, we need to understand where these missions are going and how they're coming back, uh, and keep American public safe.
Thank you, Mister Chairman, I yield back, thank you for your patience.
You bet. Thank you. Mr. Quigley.
Thank you, Mister Chairman, Minister Ritter, thank you for being here. Uh, as the, uh, Co-chair of Quiet Skies Caucus and the fact that O'Hare is in my district, uh, well aware that aircraft noise isn't just a nuisance, uh, as you know, uh study after study is now showing that it actually has uh physiological harm to people particularly senior citizens one of the reasons when we did faa reauthorization twenty twenty four we created the aircraft noise advisory committee
mmm
uh we are almost two years since we did that two years past the deadline which we were supposed to stand that up uh so my recent letter to you there was a response but it still didn't have a timeline so we're we're other than we're getting to it so uh
also we have we have closed the committee uh we we closed the committee application process on august tenth and we are reviewing with the department of transportation committee members so i do think we're gonna have a resolution on that very quickly
yeah and for years we have looked at what level of noise is acceptable right there is a standard that the best could be described as what was arbitrary
mmm
uh and i was mmm consider that we created that in the sense that we didn't wanna create a standard based on science and health that we couldn't meet but it still matters that that we know what that risk is have you had a chance yet to start to look at that in terms of what are acceptable levels of noise over an extended period of time cause as you know it's an average
uh no sir i have not i'm not not gonna tell you that otherwise i have not looked at the noise uh levels
so uh this is me officially asking you to to do that cause the two are obviously related uh back to o'hare uh being in my district it's more than that it's still now and again the busiest airport in the country um and that's important not just cause it's important to chicago but it's such a vital part of our aviation system and if it's not working well the whole system suffers which is why it should have least some priority in terms of as we address the staffing issues it is uh sixty five percent staffed and as you know we've got people working overtime for years that are getting burned out and i understand they're offering bonuses and trying to get people it's still sort of just shifting the the the burden across the country but we built this we have a runway we hardly ever use which would help cause there isn't sufficient staffing at that particular tower i'm asking all this is preface to the fact that part of the way we tried to address that staffing issue was a three point eight percent pay increase they're getting one this can't supercharge the the the the plan to dramatically increase it has to and i would see it discourage it would have to be for someone who wants to do this or someone who's currently do this it's sort of showing a lack of concern about the stress that they're under financial and otherwise why hasn't this happened yet why haven't we given our controllers is pay raise that we voted for
well i think you had four questions in there so let me try to pick those up
that that last one is probably the most important one
yeah
they they'll go hand in glove the architecture of the chicago ohio airport requires us to staff three towers during peak periods of operations so in the budget supplemental that we've been discussing how can we build one tower to replace three which would significantly improve our staffing resources the systems that we operate in chicago aren't interoperable from one tower to another they're designed to have a single tower so when i send resources to the second tower they don't have any tools in which to efficiently dispatch traffic. So, I mean, just the architecture of the system is the big part of the problem there.
Yeah.
So we should address that. The second issue, uh, as it relates to design, if we had modern airspace design, we wouldn't have to do miles and trail, twenty miles, you know, over Chicago and back in order to sequence traffic. We could sequence that traffic at altitude and then do power off descents into the terminal environment. So, we can get double wins here by reducing workload sequencing traffic at top and descent and reducing noise significantly while driving traffic efficiency all with modernization
can i beg you to the pay raise part as before
as far as the as far as the ok as far as the pay raise concerns let's be clear i have the utmost respect for our air traffic controllers i value the work that they do as a pilot myself i rely on them so i'm grateful that we have them up there we are super charging the hiring um i will correct one thing for the record they did get the one percent
well you respectfully you seem to be putting
no
condition on something that we passed by what you just said
the condition is the condition that you put on it sir i can find the language and read it to you
was it condition that we you could do something else and not give them the three point full three point eight percent
um well the language says specifically uh that such adjustment has been implemented such that all employees to the extent the administrator determines in his sole discretion that improvements in workforce scheduling staffing utilization or other operational efficiencies are achieved
Well, I respect, I would close but if if they heard what you just said, they wouldn't think that you're showing them the full respect. Show them the full three point eight percent to show their respect to what we need them for. Thank you.
Thank you, Miss Quigley. Miss Bice.
Thank you, Mister Chairman, and first of all let me say thank you, Administrator Budford, for visiting the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center. As Mister Cole mentioned, it's incredibly important um to Oklahoma and uh we appreciate the students that are training there to keep our skies safe. Um, the goal for twenty twenty six was twenty two hundred trainees to go through uh the academy. Uh, we've exceeded that number, and I think it's impressive because there were only uh little less than sixteen hundred trainees that went through uh the academy just two years ago under the Biden administration so thank you for focusing on ensuring that we are increasing the number of trainees that are coming through um Secretary Duffy and President Trump. um have prioritized air traffic safety and um continuing to invest in the future of aviation so we're very appreciative um i wanna just circle back quickly about uh a comment that chairman cole made uh in regards to expansion of training facilities i i wanna make clear i i have not heard you say and i wanna confirm that you are not looking to build a second um uh training facility in the country is that correct
no we we have no plans to build a second training facility.
Perfect. Thank you for clarifying that. Um, there have been some discussions about potentially retiring the Rnav systems to include ILS uh systems at two airports in my district, Shawnee Regional Airport as well as Wiley Post Airport. And I just wanna say that with the twenty twenty eight Olympics coming up, we're hosting multiple events in Oklahoma City. In the fifth district, I would strongly discourage retiring these systems. uh because we would like to keep them for uh redundancy purposes to keep pilots and passengers safe so wanna make sure i touch on that um moving on to actual questions i've been briefed a couple on a couple of activities that could accelerate uh the and ensure that cutting edge technologies like uh high power microwave systems can be tested safely within the united states what additional authority or resources does the faa need to expedite those efforts
uh so today as you maybe aware we have uh i assume we talk about counter uas systems
correct yes sir
um we have nine test facilities for uas systems we would like to turn those into both uh uas and counter uas and i think we could stand to have more than nine i think uh there the demands on these training facilities are pretty significant uh so i think the you know the country could benefit uh in terms of innovation and designing these systems uh if we had more resource uh available to test and train in.
Um do you but do you feel like the current fa authorities will sufficiently allow for live testing? uh live third party ranges? For example we have the emerging aviation technology center um in the Choctaw nation, Oklahoma. Do you feel like there's any changes that need to be made from an authority's standpoint to continue to expand those?
Oh. My understanding, and I'll I'll I'll qualify that by saying it is my understanding, is that we we have pretty strong discretion in terms of what we can do on the the the ranges. uh i think what we again wanna make sure is whatever testing we're doing there does not interfere with any active uh aviation services that we're offering
you mentioned you'd like to see more than nine is there some sort of limitation that's prohibiting you from expanding that number
yeah the the current statute caps it at nine
so there is a statutory change that needs to happen to be able to expand
if we're if we're going to increase the number of ranges not necessarily what we do on each range
ok perfect um The FA's safety data transformation challenge showed that AI can identify and mitigate safety risk across across the NAS. Um, given the recent concerns about AI, how are you ensuring that new technology that's being incorporated um keeps decision making to the skilled air traffic controllers hands?
Yes. So, uh, uh, I realize this is a a a topic of popular conversation right now. You know, there, AI comes in many shades, you know, from machine learning or AI enabled. the way the faa thinks about the use of ai as a decision help tool not a decision replacement tool so you know we're not taking humans out of the loop when we look at ai that we're currently using in our safety foundry platform uh essentially what we're asking the ai do to do is go look at the entirety of data and you tell us if you're seeing trends or correlation or causation that i can't see and it is fantastic at parsing through terabytes of data and bringing things to us we don't then say, oh, the AI says to do this, let's go do this. It brings us back the data and then we apply human, you know, intuition and oversight to it. So, again, it is a fantastic decision support tool and it will be revolutionized revolutionary when we bring it into the national airspace system.
Miss Administrator, thank you.
But it won't control traffic.
Um, thank you for what you do. Thank you for focusing on making sure that we continue to keep our um sky safe and without misdetermined yield.
Thank you, Miss Bice. Miss Watson-Coleman.
Thank you, Mister Chairman, and thank you, Mister Administrator, for enlightening us in many ways, particularly as it relates to the modernization of infrastructure. I am concerned, however, with regard to your response to the Congressman's question regarding the two point eight um, pay rates. And I think that what you described is almost a catch-twenty-two situation. You want more efficiency. You don't think they've met that efficiency. you don't think that they're working as effectively but then you say you're understaffed they say that they're working six days a week sometimes ten hours a day sometimes even more and then have a responsibility to do training they're contending that the morale in the agency is very bad and that you seem to be operating it as if you're a a corporate bottom-line person who is concerned about um money and um that's what what i'm concerned about cause i'm concerned about safety and i'm concerned about respecting the work that the air traffic controllers should must do to keep us safe and i wanna know why in your discretion because it is solely your discretion you have not given them the three point eight uh percent increase it just seems like a very modest request for employees that are so vitally important to our well-being
well madam in full transparency i am trying to honor the language that's in the bill the bill the bill requires
the language is in the bill is that you are the one that have the
us to accomplish something
excuse me sir you have the discretion to give these three point eight percent increases it is in your discretion so what are you trying to honor
i'm trying to honor the language that says operational efficiencies are achieved contribute to addressing workforce shortfalls and enhancing aviation safety.
ok so if i may thank you so it is your contention that you don't have operational efficiency while you have um understaffing overworked individuals that are responsible for the safety of air traffic is that what you're saying
What i'm saying is i lean into the data i know you're i know you're listening to a lot of anecdotal information that's coming back.
are you
But the data will tell us something entirely different. So.
Um, uh, you know what I'm concerned about? You may look at data, but I listen to people. And if I hear consistently that the people that we as Congress are supposed to protect are being negatively impacted, that the people responsible for our safety in the airways are in fact, um, depressed and overworked and have mental health issues that aren't even being addressed appropriately. I listen to that. when i hear it more than once and i hear it in more than one um uh uh distribution of information i recognize that it's more than just anecdotal and so i ask you right now what specifically would it take for you to give this three point eight percent increase to these individuals and when what are you gonna do to help them to be in a position to receive it and i wanna know when and what
well the answer to your question is in the twenty twenty six workforce plan so it's
i ask you the question you give me the answer don't tell me to read something just give me the answer
the answer yes the answer is over the last fifteen years we've seen the
respectfully sir
efficiency of our controller schedules decrease from five hours on position to under four hours on position and i don't think that makes sense to me i think we can schedule our workforce more efficiently to get back to where we were fifteen years ago
how long have you been in this position
fourteen months
fourteen months what ok you're not gonna answer this question so let me just share with you what i think i think that the complaints that i'm hearing from various uh avenues are legitimate i think that the morale in the agency is very low and that's very concerning to me because of the work that they're responsible for doing i think that uh the fact that people are walking away before even um spending all the time that they could to accumulate full pension is something that has to do with why we have delays in newark airport why we have delays in other airport why o'hare has delays And I think that we are not looking at, or this administration doesn't value the work that people do on behalf of the country, and behalf of the safety and security of our nation. And I think that you need to look down and talk to those people that you are in charge of, and you need to have a better understanding of what their concerns are, and how you could improve the morale there as well as the safety and security in our airspace.
Well, respectfully disagree ma'am,
And I think that you're you're failing in that as this administration has and I yield back.
you know, if we wanna improve the morale of our controlling workforce, we'll hire them, we'll continue to hire, and we'll give them, put them in facilities that don't look like, like a junkyard. So why don't we invest in building facilities for them, where they have plumbing, and air conditioning, and working elevators. So yes, let's get adequately staffed.
Yeah. That too. But let's move on it. and let's deal with the human human aspects of what's happening.
I've been in the field. I've been over three dozen of our facilities in the past fourteen months,
Yeah, well,
so I'm out there talking to them.
then let let us do what we're expecting you to do.
I I'm doing exactly what you wrote in the law, ma'am.
Dear Lady, yours back. Miss Torres.
Uh, thank you, Chairman, and um, welcome to our committee,
Thank you.
Administrator Bedford. Um, my office sent you in advance some of my concerns, so we're no one is uh um surprised um i as i was sharing with you earlier i proudly represent the ontario international airport uh fifteen years ago the airport didn't have local control or the local people did not have control of their airport um so i made it my mission uh when i came to congress in twenty fifteen um to figure out how we can get uh back to owning the locals owning that airport and with the help of um representative ken calvert we accomplished that in just over a year um when i first got here
mmm
there are three appropri appropriators um that represent that region uh representative aguilar myself and um uh representative calvert and we're very committed to ensuring the economic growth of that region so i i wanna i wanna first of all i wanna invite you uh to visit the airport and the region and and and really assess for yourself and maybe your team um can help us assess the needs the growing needs of the region since um ontario took or their locals took local control of the airport um it has supported twenty four thousand jobs it added five billion dollars to the regional economy passenger numbers have nearly doubled to more than seven million passengers. And my favorite part is that you can still get from the curb and through security in about a quarter of the time as any other airport in the region. Ontario is one of America's busiest cargo airports and an important piece of the national supply chain, which is why I co-lead the bipartisan Air Caucus uh Air Cargo Caucus. This past year alone, I was proud to uh be able to secure thirty three million dollars in catch up dollars, because during the time that we did not have control, all of that slowed down, there was no airport improvements um that were being done. So, Mister Bedford, Ontario is an excellent example of what a growing airport looks like. Um it is well managed and again, I wanna invite you, I want you to commit. i'll be happy to to send your team and to come out and and and visit with us um so that you can see the happy to do so challenge that we have before us um thank you for that we'll follow up with you i recently met with our air traffic controllers in just a little different approach i've tremendous respect as you do um enumeration for the work that they do it's really really critical work uh the faa classifies the ontario air traffic control facility at a level five the classification does not reflect the operational complexity of the airspace which includes twenty four hour operations complicated overnight traffic and cargo demands and leaves our air traffic controllers with less pay less training dollars um and lower priority for technology upgrades and it's those technology upgrades that i mean also critically uh concerned about the towers should be reviewed and reclassified so our air traffic controllers are properly recognized and given the resources that they need in order to maintain the the experienced personnel that we need in the region um as you're very well aware because of my most recent complaints to the faa we have a lot of training schools in the area and suddenly with the tax um opportunities for uh private jet owners we have a whole new group of people that are training in the area
that area is very busy
i it's very busy um so again i i hope that you would reconsider looking at that carragh uh category five that they would that they have been uh put into and that and that we could um improve the staffing level for that airport
so just by way of background uh those levels are collectively bargained uh and and the last time they were collectively bargained was just as the biden administration was leaving so that was december of twenty twenty four
ok ok ok
uh the contract was amended uh and those levels were reassessed
and when um it doesn't make sense to me how um an airport that creates that much um work in the in the region and it is such an economic engine would have less staff than the than a little airport that is right next to my home laverne bracket field
i'll take i'll take well that that shouldn't the the the level uh sets the pay it doesn't set the staffing so i'll take a look at that
ok thank you i appreciate that i yield back
mister rutherford
thank you mr. chairman mister bedford uh thank you for being here today and i wanna talk a little bit about a general aviation airport in jacksonville florida which is in kind of a unique situation uh as you may or may not know following a decision by the nineteen ninety three braq commission
mmm
uh they closed naval air station cecil field and that airfield was decommissioned in nineteen ninety nine and was transferred to the jacksonville aviation authority uh however it proudly remains critical to a variety of national defense uh particularly the Fleet Readiness Center Southeast and and plays a critical role in federal counter narcotics uh operations the HITRON from the Coast Guard the helicopter interdiction um tactical squadron that is stationed out there flying both the MH sixty-fiveE and the the p three's out of there they have over two hundred personnel there it's a and their tempo is very high with you know the interdiction that we're seeing in in the caribbean uh now but uh so so they are truly meeting the needs of the department of war and the department of homeland security uh and and it's becoming a major military maintenance as i mentioned with fleet running in southeast and we see these operations can just continuing to expand and in fact CISL played a critical role uh you may know in staging uh air area for the aircraft that went to venezuela uh during that great uh operation snatching maduro out of bed uh now CISL as you know CISL has a very large infrastructure they have one twelve thousand five hundred and three foot runway um was actually used for space re-entry even with the shuttles um as as a standby then it has an additional three eight thousand foot runways with all of this work that's going on uh yeah because it's a typical it's not your typical general aviation airport it it really is more of a military airfield um but it isn't eligible to compete for grants and so what what i'd like to ask is if if we could work with you and your staff to look at some maybe some type of way that we can expand the grant opportunities uh to help maintain the runways uh the aprons the taxiways uh because it is a massive uh effort. And. i'd like to know if uh the faa if you all would be willing to help us with that.
so i i think there are。 two perhaps three things we should talk about uh first is uh i think we believe that airport should be eligible for aip. but it'll have to apply so there's probably some education that we need to do to make sure they understand what is available to them.
mmm
second issue are workforce grants so if there really is workforce development that's going on whether that's aviation. technicians or uh construction there may be things that we can do there from a workforce grant perspective we've i think we're close to issuing twenty six million in workforce grants we have another forty
mmm
uh that we can issue uh going into the next fiscal year
mmm
and then finally uh as i understand cecil is a contract tower not a actual uh federally owned tower uh we do have a program that looks at uh smaller towers you know that are federal contract towers not faa managed towers
mmm
um we have two that we're working through that process now mesa gateway and bozeman um this might be an airport that should have a look at to see whether or not it should move from a contractor tower to a federal tower
ok thank you very much we'll we'll get with you and talk some more about that cause it it it really is a critical need out there you you mentioned the copper wiring you're at about sixty four percent now i think
sir uh sir
uh from from your comments today um can can you talk just a little bit about if we are in the success that you maybe having with uh already integrating uh because of the fiber optics the high speed uh cable you've already been able to put in is is that are have we removed all of the uh visual separation of helicopters and commercial flights now
so the in response to the safety data that we're seeing earlier this year in march we issued what's referred to as a general notice and the general notice prohibits now employing visual separation as a as a means of practical separation between two traveling aircraft helicopter and a fixed wing aircraft in class B airspace arrival and departure corridors and class C airspace arrival and departure corridors and any place where we have a terminal radar approach uh uh capability so where we can separate traffic with actual controllers and positive radar separation that is the requirement now
ok good thank you uh my time's up uh you're back
mr. aguilar
thank you mr. chairman uh administrator thank you for being here today i uh am a district adjacent to uh miss torres uh so we appreciate you committing to to come out to visit the region uh you were just talking about aip with mister rutherford and uh we're thankful that the faa has awarded uh recent uh grant programs uh uh recent aip dollars uh to the region investments like these keep our airport safe and competitive boost our economy and support good paying jobs for the region i hope we can count on the faa s continued partnership to ensure this program remains fully funded and to be able to get funds out the door quickly. Uh, I wanted to turn to another issue I've raised previously, um, that would benefit, uh, the region. Last year, I asked your predecessor for a status update on the implementation of legislation, uh, that I, uh, carried, uh, the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Supportive Services Expansion Act, which was incorporated into the FAA Reauthorization Act of twenty twenty four. This law directed the fa to create a disadvantaged business enterprise program to give minority and women owned businesses a fair shot at competing For local airport contracts. Uh Do you have a status update uh on this i know the administration Has attacked programs like this in the past and i just wanna tell you how important it is For businesses to have an opportunity to compete for federal resources uh could you share the status of the disadvantaged business enterprise
uh well in all honesty i'd i'd rather go back and get more knowledgeable about it i do know that the the administration has gone through sort of a recalibration of uh its processes and priorities i believe that is done now so i should be able to give you a better response than what i'm able to do right now
just reminder this was legislative language here so uh i don't and i i i i understand you know that so uh this you know carries the
uh so yes
the the weight of law so uh understand um that you might need to get uh up to speed on this and i talked to your predecessor about this uh as i mentioned but would uh welcome an opportunity to talk with you about this uh in the future as well after you get some time yeah
uh will follow up with your office
i i appreciate it um administrator last november the dot the dot withdrew a biden era proposed rule that would have required airlines to provide compensation meals hotel and transportation for cancellations or delays of three or more hours due to factors within the airline's own control. Airline cause delays and cancellations stemming from crew scheduling or maintenance issues frequently disrupt. Millions of Americans travel every year, and American consumers foot the bill. Uh, in response to miss Watson Coleman, you said that you were driven by data. Uh, the data of your own agency showed that sixty percent of the delays of long domestic delays were airline caused. not weather or air traffic related. Why rescind the rule?
Uh, i really can't speak intelligently to that um, you know i'm not in the involved in the dot assessment on. Those sorts of issues, i mean i can speak to modernization or workforce staffing or anything faa related.
Did they ask you or the fa anything related to?
i i couldn't say,
The rule?
me personally no, but i don't know if they asked somebody else at faa.
Sure.
do you think that it's fair for the american public to pay uh to to pay for the delays
um uh i really don't have it but
you're you're a you're a pilot yourself you're a consumer um
the the data that i've seen would indicate that between weather and what air traffic control services cause that is the vast majority of delays in the system today
it's not what your own data says though
it's uh well we should compare no so so we got a second take away go back to on the small business piece and then we'll compare the data on uh delay causes
sure i'd welcome it you said that you were guided by data so i'd just like to know if that's if that's true or not if your agency's own data was the
sure absolutely bet
subject for the department of transportation um to make a decision uh yeah i'd be curious to know uh what data you folks were looking at um that's fair
i'd love to
i look forward to the conversation thank you mr. chairman yield back
mr. joyce you're recognized for five minutes
thank you very thank you very much mr. chairman good after good morning good morning
good morning
unauthorized drones continue to pose a potential threat to critical infrastructure and pose military relations across the country including the possibility that hostile actors could use drones to conduct surveillance or facilitate an attack given that the faa manages the national airspace system while dhs doj and dow have varying authorities to detect and counter these threats, how is the FAA coordinating with these agencies to insure unauthorized drone activity over critical infrastructure and military facilities is quickly identified and addressed further gaps in FAA's current authorities technology or inter-agency coordination that are preventing the federal government from effectively deterring and responding to these threats.
Well, thank you for the question. It's certainly top of mind these days. I will tell you, today we're coordinating much better than we were a year ago.
Good.
so um the president and his team have a significant line of sight on drones and um it's it's an interesting policy choice that we're in because on the one hand we want we see tremendous commercial opportunities for drones and the convenience that they can bring for the american consumers i mean imagine seniors who can stay at home and have medicine flown in real time you know right to their door uh so they're and we're seeing over a million drone operations per month just in dallas fort worth and it's expanding across the country so on the one hand
right
uh the president would like us to unleash american drone dominance to onshore the production and and innovation on drones which we can then of course see the the military applications of these so let's onshore that innovation here in america and so unleashing commercial drone dominance will unleash drone innovation of course um if we have one bad actor you know of course we have some folks who are ignorant of the law today the law requires drones to stay out of see sensitive areas uh uh sporting events things of that nature but even at world cup where we had a massive oversight on on it we still had seven hundred people operating drones where they shouldn't have been out of ignorance so i think that's the number one issue that we face is someone flying a drone where it just shouldn't be
as long as all seven hundred could be presumed to be ignorant you know some of the bad actors
well so we we caught all seven hundred of them
good
and uh you know so law enforcement we do have means by which we can identify the operator of the drone now but what we're really worried about is the
mmm
uh the nefarious actor who isn't playing by the rules and so for that we need a different form of surveillance on the southern border we created a buffer
mmm
five mile buffer across the entire southern border uh we've created space for a counter drone capability that has been deployed now and certified by or validated by faa to operate under the uh auspices of both military and department of homeland services so uh in the in the short answer we recognize the threat the federal government recognizes the severity of the threat and is taking action i think we could move faster uh again it wasn't wasn't being actioned under the prior administration so we are working rapidly to catch up with where the technology is but i think we've got the right line of sight on it and we've got the right team within the administration across all agencies focused on it
well sir when an unauthorized drone is identified operating over military installation or other restricted critical infrastructure what steps do you take uh to investigate and enforce against the operator how many of these incidents have you referred for civil enforcement or criminal prosecution and what penalties are currently available to deter individuals or potentially malicious actors from repeatedly violating these restrictions
uh so um i can't give you specific numbers we do have them hundreds dozens thousands i'm not sure what the specific number is but yes there is a um we do have um electronic conspicuity on drones they are required to broadcast uh they broadcast on mobile channels a law enforcement is able to obtain those broadcasts to identify who the drone operator is and actually locate the drone operator So, um, we we are referring those for prosecution. Uh.
Good. Uh, one last one, and this is, uh, one at home. You know, which
Sure.
i- is very important. Uh, an issue at Lake County Executive Airport involving runway twenty-three. The airport is currently operating under a no-TAM that limits the nighttime instrument approaches and airport officials have indicated the FAA has told them that no-TAM can be removed once the required nighttime evaluation of the runway is completed. The airport has been working to get that evaluation scheduled, but it's had significant significant difficulty getting that date set on the calendar.
Alright.
Given this appears to be the last remaining step, can I ask you to uh help me in making sure we can get that done in in short order?
I can't even get my hometown ILS certified. So, I'm not sure. I'm gonna be a lot of help there, but I'll take it back and we'll we'll see what we can do.
Thank you very much for your time, sir.
Thank you.
Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
Mr. Shreve.
Thank you, Chairman Womack. Administrator, um, I'm the newest member, uh, of the subcommittee. But I served on TNI and the Aviation subcommittee.
I think I am, actually.
And so, we we had an opportunity to visit a time or two on subject matter, including, uh, drones that, uh, we wrestled with mightily, uh, on Aviation subcommittee. Um, I'm a Hoosier, as are you. I represent, uh, uh, part of IND, the terminal,
yeah
infrastructures in in indiana sixth district uh and so in the in the vein of mr. joyce's questions the commercialization of drones in a distribution based part of uh america is a great big deal indiana is in a a drone corridor um the um on the issue of the drone infrastructure inspection grants i mean drones have been a material advancement in the utility of inspecting america's built infrastructure we don't have to have old bell helicopters running along utility lines and so forth uh and we're wrestling with infrastructure maintenance uh mightily uh tni committee and here on tihud uh but there's this uh grant program that congress authorized in twenty four i was not here then uh but funded uh as part of the twenty six fiscal year dot appropriation i was here um and uh dot i believe faa is involved in the administration of that program is that is that accurate
um i'll be honest with you i'm unaware of it
oh ok
but i'm i'm about to get aware of it
alright can if if you don't know would you would you please find and report back on what the department and faa is doing to insure the yes swift implementation of the grant program for this fiscal year fiscal year twenty six as this committee considers program funding for fiscal year twenty seven
i will do so
i would appreciate that um also in the vein of uh drones uh beyond visual line of sight bvls not not a familiar acronym to a lot of people But can you share how the department and the FAA has revised the BVLOS proposed rule to insure that lifesaving public safety operations, already happening at scale, uh, today across America will not be negatively implemented.
Uh, I can. I mean, the the BV loss is, uh, as you can imagine, it is a foundational bill in terms of how we're going to reconcile good drone use versus bad drone use um it wasn't initially intended to be that it was intentionally intended to be a good drone use but we want to future proof that now by making sure that we've got the right uh sandbox around how drones will operate in a way that we can easily identify bad actors and mitigate those threats so that that rule's taken little bit longer to get out but i think the reason for the delay is common sense um it is a rule that is got a lot of eyesight all across government right now and some of it is um um you know we're not quite there but we're working our way through it uh as it relates to law enforcement they will have privacy they will they will have full unfettered access to aerospace other drones will stand aside as law enforcement is taking care of their first responder obligations
i wanna i wanna circle back to the close to um controller staffing
sure
uh you updated us on that earlier in your remarks but taking it close to home in internaplis ind uh mario rodriguez uh our friend is actually out here i believe today with our state chamber board um the uh the shortages the acute shortages that we've wrestled with uh in the new york uh new jersey uh airspace play right on through to ind and columbus and and other secondary uh mid-sized airport markets i wrestle with it as a as a consumer um can you offer as best you may an updated timeline to getting the the controller staffing in the new york new jersey airspace up to where we've gotta get to so it doesn't directly acutely affect airspace such as ind
uh well so first of all let's all acknowledge that the controller workforce shortage is a decades long problem this isn't something that the trump administration invented uh we inherited a really poor hand and we're playing that hand out the best we can you provided budget for us to supercharge hiring thank you for that and we've taken that budget and we've hired over two thousand people in fiscal twenty five another twenty two hundred who are in the door as we speak another twenty three hundred are we're already you know in the identification and onboarding process ok that's fine great you're doing all the hiring that you can there's a lot of work between hiring and then training someone before they can actually dispatch traffic and yet there's another effect whether we can get them to go to new york um that is the most difficult place in the national aviation system to to staff um i'm not sure why but we've gotta figure that out so even if i could fully staff the NAS, I can't make people go work in New York. Uh, we have got to figure out why. I don't know if it and and and shame on me, I haven't been there yet. So in full disclosure, that's on my to-do list before the end of the fiscal year.
Administrator, I uh appreciate that and can understand that. I don't think a lot of uh people realize that our controllers have to retire at age fifty six, which certainly adds to the challenge.
Well, they don't have to. So there is, you can ask for an exemption and the uh secretary can grant an exemption and he has. Granted exemptions and he's added. I think a thirty thousand dollar a year incentive for controllers. Uh, to stick around longer. Um. But yes, after twenty five years and at age fifty six, you can retire with a full pension.
Thank you. I appreciate it. I yield back.
Mr. Siskamani.
Thank you, Chairman Womack, and uh thank you also. mr. for for being here with us today and and spending time with us answering some of the questions on the on the priorities of of the faa um i actually would like to start off by saying that i would love to have you in arizona so you can see for yourself some of the the great investments
can we do that in february
and projects what was that
can we do that in february
we i was gonna invite you in august see how committed you really are but uh but yes i i think you can be picking the spring is a good time to to be there and actually it wouldn't be a bad timeline given some of the the these investments in these projects and and what we can what we can do and which state they will be in so the first one i wanna bring up to you is the pinal air park our traffic control tower mmm yeah this is uh uh a key one for us uh i i wanna thank you and the thank you faa for accepting the uh pinal air park into the federal contact tower the the fct program as you know the air park supports more than one hundred thousand commercial and military making a new tower a major investment in the region's aviation safety economy and military readiness as well uh i was able to secure one point six million in the fy twenty seven ti hut bill for the initial stages of the tower construction this is an area in arizona that is growing exponentially right in pinal county it's in between tucson and phoenix so this is an area where a lot of people work a lot of people are moving in as well more traffic there could you walk us through the next steps for the local and the regional airports across uh the country and and specifically this one the uh fct program
well so the the fct program i think is a wonderful way for us to look at emerging airports and provide them with control services that otherwise they wouldn't qualify for uh a federal tower um so uh and uh in doing so as we create more contract towers we're also creating another workforce uh feeder stream you know because as they gain experience in the contract tower program they then become eligible to transfer into the federal uh air traffic control services organization so i think it actually there's multiple benefits there as far as uh where my heart is if you look over the last twenty five years we've seen a continuous decrease in service to small town america and it's unfortunate because driving is certainly
mmm
much less safe much more expensive i think um and less convenient and so being able to reconnect small town america to the nation's air transportation system i think is has to be one of our our key priorities aside from safety aside from efficiency we want more people flying and we want them to be able to fly with convenience we used to have service in south bend and evansville and
yeah
fort wayne and i mean we've lost service in so many places terre haute um it's unfortunate uh through the uh uh increase of advanced air mobility electrified you know small aircraft again i think this is gonna be our opportunity to reconnect a lot of small town america safely and efficiently to the national air transportation system so i think that's a place where we really should lean in
great well thank you um i was just right before this actually as i walked in meeting with some of the folks from home and the uh regarding the tucson tucson airport as well the tucson international airport and the tucson airport authority so on that my my next question is uh the the tucson uh airport authority which is in the middle of uh an airfield safety enhancement project uh program project while the airport has been fortunate to secure significant grant funding which they're very grateful for the uncertainty has been difficult as they plan uh the various phases moving moving forward as you know the fa engages in letters of intent in various projects but not airfield safety projects so um what prevents the faa from entering into letters of intent for airfield safety projects and and could the faa enter into letter of intent with airports that outline that that outline the uh its financial uh commitments particularly for multi-layer projects and multi-year projects such as the airfield safety enhancement program which can take up to about ten years to complete
yeah so um i'm not thoroughly versed in how letters of intent with individual airports i'm aware we have executed one with tucson for i think a hundred and seventy five million dollars so we i know we do them and we do them in ways to be collaborative um but i i think sitting here today the funds that we do get through budget are finite i think we have four billion dollars in our aip program uh over four hundred airports want access to those funds they're segmented between small medium and large hub airport so uh again we try to get the money out the doors efficiently and as quickly as we can and respect the constraints that the legislation requires.
Right. So I that letter of intent has been helpful in the planning phases of it. When it comes to safety projects, sometimes that doesn't seem to apply as well. So I'm interested to know what the the reasoning behind that, what could be done and what are the options there. I'm out of time, so we can talk that off-line.
Well, yeah, I'd be happy to if we have a safety issue there,
But
I'd sure like to know about it.
Sure, would love to work with you on that. Thanks, Chairman. You're back.
Thank you. Um, that completes our our uh first round. And um, I'm gonna extend the subcommittee hearing uh briefly. And if any of the members remaining have a follow-up question they'd like to ask, be thinking about that right now, I'd like to do kind of a lightning round and and and let me begin. Um, Administrator Bedford, I I wanna turn uh to your efforts on new automation software that i have seen demonstrated it's it's fascinating um in june of twenty six your agency awarded a twelve year contract for the flow management data services platform fmds and the new strategic management of airspace routes and trajectories the smart capability as i said i i i i've looked at it it's um to me it's fascinating Uh, and you're also pursuing a common automation platform to replace aging systems that track aircraft, ERAM and STARS, um, to be specific. Give us your thoughts on these platforms. Um, your vision and timeline for getting Smart and Cap developed and deployed, and how to, how to, how do the, how does this fit in the broader, uh, modernization program?
Uh, well, thank you for the question, Chairman Wilmack. I think this is the this may be the most difficult element of modernization to actually wrap your your brain around because when we talk about phase one which is all infrastructure it's tangible right we can see whether a tower is being built we can see a radar being installed i was at newark two weeks ago with the secretary we were literally dropping the crane with the new radar surface movement radar in place i mean so we can see it we can see trenching and new cabling and you know stuff shows up at the facilities the redesign of the actual traffic management systems that doesn't isn't something that we generally see but if you do go to our facilities and i would be happy to go there with you if you're interested um what you'll see is really old stuff that our controllers are using i mean it hasn't changed in fifty years even though we've modernized we had a modernization effort in the nineteen eighties we kept the interfaces exactly the same as they were in the sixties that's the thing that really has to change we have to rethink entirely the tools that we have and the good news is these systems exist today they're scalable the architecture nimble and we can put them in the cloud where we can get unlimited compute power and make sure they're cyber secure so lots of benefits of moving from what we have today which is three hundred and thirteen separate air traffic control systems you think of this as an integrated system It's really not. We have three hundred and thirteen individual air traffic control systems. OK, the positive of that is when one goes down, like Minneapolis center went down, I don't know, maybe six weeks ago due to a power outage. Not an FAA power outage, but a city power outage. But it brought our center down. And Minneapolis, Saint Paul and Minnesota went dark. No airs, no, no coverage, no airplanes moving. The rest of the world, you know, rest of the system continued to operate. But the point is, those systems are so fragile, you know, that any one of them could go in up at any time, versus having the ubiquity of cloud-based services where, even if something's happening locally, I can simply transfer that data to an, to a place where I do have power and I can continue to manage traffic. So, three things. We've gotta bring the systems into the twenty-first century. We've gotta bring our controller interfaces into the twenty-first century. and we have to bring our data architecture into the twenty first century today all the data is local so the new york data is in the new york center and nobody else can see it now the smart system that i demonstrated for you earlier we've taken a a different data source all the adsb data from the nas we it's infused into that system so i can see more today on my ipad than any controller can see in the entire national air aviation system That's how archaic the tools that we currently have are. So, I do implore you for the second round of investment. This is what will really supercharge our ability to safely grow traffic, and reduce the workload and strain on our controllers.
So, if you can do that with your iPad, why do we need air traffic controllers? Can't you just run it all yourself?
Well, uh. So, again.
Uh, that was a facetious question.
Yeah, sure, sure. Layer, we have layers and layers of safe.
Didn't get any laughs. But.
In in the,
Yeah.
at the end of the day, the human is the final layer of safety.
Yeah.
And sadly, we've seen where that's failed. And we don't want to have to rely
Yeah.
on human separation. We want these systems to be able to do it for them, but we need the human there in case.
It's gonna require more money too.
This second phase, which arguably is the most important phase, is at least another ten billion.
Thank you. Mister Kleiber.
Thank you, Mister Chairman. Uh, let me get back to this. Um. uh mr administrator i i've been here for over three decades but i spent about three decades as a manager of people uh governmental uh entities and as i read the legislation on the pay raise the intent was to put air traffic controllers on par with law enforcement that was intended at three point eight now the discretion uh that was given to you uh had to do i think with an improving uh the environment and the folks i suspect you may be having trouble getting people to work up in new york because of their pay and so it would seem to me if you give them their pay raise that we uh give i don't think the law give you the authority to squeeze more work out of overwork overstressed uh uh workforce so it would seem to me uh that uh this pay raise question uh you're taking some discretions not intended in the law certainly not intended when Congress approved was to put them on par with other people doing similar work. And I know a little something about being underpaid and overworked. Is so I think you're taking the stressing that was not intended.
Thank you for that. Miss Baish.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Um, to follow up on the line of questioning, you mentioned in your earlier testimony that um that you're you're concerned about the number of hours that are being logged um by air traffic controllers there's a discrepancy that you're trying to track is that accurate
also today we we don't track controller time unless they're physically separating traffic so on an eight hour shift um they come in and they do work when it's assigned to them and then when there's no work assigned to them we don't know for sure what they're doing you know and that's not to say they're not doing work we just don't know exactly what that work is because we don't actually like punch time cards or keep track of it so but we can tell with the data that we have is we can tell that you know fifteen years ago we were operating many more hours on desk than we are operating today and so we've seen a consistent decrease in the amount of time on position today and an increase in overtime usage and that i think it's we should be curious why that is we should ask questions because that's what we should do that's what you pay us to do so we're asking questions and what we're saying our schedules that are very inefficient where i have controllers in facilities with nothing to do and i prefer to have controllers in facilities when there's actually work to be done that's what we're trying and this isn't across the the entire faa this is really limited to about forty facilities across the country that need a deeper line of sight. And also I've asked our union partners to do with us is work with me to look at those facilities to see if we can improve those schedules. I yield. That's all I've asked.
I I personally just don't uh, I can't wrap my head around time on station or whatever you call it, going down and overtime going higher.
Those are the facts, sir.
Help help me understand Why I can't wrap my head around that.
What? Sure.
Is it management?
Well, so it may be, but let's talk about that. If we're doing a bad job of managing the workforce,
Yeah.
let's figure that out and fix it. So I'm not absolving management here.
Yeah.
We absolutely may be the problem. But I'd like to work with our labor partners to figure that out.
Yeah, very good. Miss Torres.
Uh, thank you, Chairman, and uh, I just wanna encourage you, maybe this is a round table. camera meeting that we need to have maybe a follow-up um with the administrator or the staff there's so many issues that we want to address um right now i wanna talk to you about preempting um state laws uh multiple court rulings and supreme court precedent have made it clear that the faa does not have the authority to overrule the state and local laws uh congress intentionally did not grant this authority under the faa reauthorization or other laws uh but despite this the faa recently proposed a rule allowing the faa to overrule and preempt any state and local meal and rest uh break laws limiting flight crews or flight attendants ability to be well rested i was on a flight a week ago from california to uh dca it should have been a five hour flight it took us ten hours to get here we were over dca um air for thirty minutes
the smart system will help
yes before we ran out of fuel and uh when we ran out of fuel we had to divert to bwi we couldn't um get off the flight there um for first time all year i checked in a bag so i was trapped i couldn't get off without the bag um my concern is for the the violent interactions that we are seeing more and more between the passengers and how they abuse um some of the flight crew um we need them to be in the best spirits um that they can possibly be and denying you know brakes because it's more efficient
mmm
or uh you know better for the airline is certainly not the experience that i want to have um the more patient that these flight attendants could be uh with these aggressive uh passengers the better off and the mmm safer that we will be by the way ken calvert was on that flight with me too anyway what can you do um to ensure that we are abiding by the local state laws rather than preempting them
well uh first of all i'm i'm not a lawyer and i'm not gonna pretend to be a lawyer um i do believe that um if if our our law team believes this is something that is relevant to assert our authorities that's what they're doing so i have to trust that the legal team actually knows what they're doing and there's purpose behind it as far as uh rest breaks are concerned we highly regulate through the faa the amount of duty rest that's required for the flight crews uh so i think we're concerned when we see state law preempt our regulatory authorities require. That's where we feel like we have to throw the flag on that. And if that ultimately requires a court of higher jurisdiction to arbitrate that dispute, so be it. But we do have the authority to regulate crew duty time limits and mandatory crew rest. And that's that's what we're protecting.
Uh, my time expired, but the courts did not agree with that yet. So, we can have a longer conversation on this.
I think this is the first time we've actually asserted our authority.
Yeah. Thank you.
Yeah. Thank you, Ms. Torres. Mister Siskamani.
Yeah. Thank you. Thank you for the this extra opportunity. I there was one more thing I wanted to bring up uh on the uh the FAA reauthorization act of twenty twenty four. On that on the bill it included federal funding for airports to convert from uh the AFFF mandated by the FAA to be used by all commercial service airports
Right.
to F three and properly disposed of the PFAS containing forever chemicals. the tucson airport authority has acted in good faith and converted from uh the afff to f three foam at a cost uh well over six hundred thousand right now in addition to the airport purchasing two new panther fire trucks and replace the tank of the rapid intervention vehicle so they they're doing all that they can on this um can you provide me some insight on the reimbursement process of this since they haven't seen it yet of of them and and the other airports that have um complied with the phone transition and they're still not seeing the the um the reimbursement and when can airports expect the financial relief from the funds uh they have expanded to address the environmental concerns
yes that one i can address um while while all of the uh system processing uh with the airports has been accomplished there is no money in the budget to fund reimbursement so this will have to be a unique line item that congress will have to give us uh budgeting dollars in order to do reimbursement for And it's not just your airports, sir. There are hundreds of these airports that require, are are seeking reimbursement for funding, we just don't have any money for it.
What's a ballpark figure of the funding necessary for the reimbursements?
Oh, um, let me, let me go back and get more intelligence before I, I give you that number, but I'll, I'd be happy to share that with both you and, uh, and Chairman Womack and Ranking Member Clyburn.
Yeah, I would be very interested in getting that, Sure. and, um, advocating for that. It's, um, I know that it's gonna I mean, airports have done this, expecting to get reimbursed and we should address that immediately. So, uh, thank you, Chairman, I yield back.
You bet. Thank you, Administrator Bedford, for being here today. We appreciate your time and your testimony. Uh, we may have some members that would like to submit some questions for the record. All we ask is that the agency respond in a timely fashion. Members, please submit any questions for the record to subcommittee staff within seven days. And with that, this subcommittee hearing stands adjourned. thank you
Morning digest
Start every morning briefed on yesterday’s hearings
A free weekday email covering yesterday’s hearings and transcripts newly unlocked in the archive.



