Summary
- Steve Pearce (Nominee to be Director, Bureau of Land Management) pledged to uphold federal law against large-scale public land sales and defer disposal decisions to Congress.
- Kyle Haustveit (Nominee to be Under Secretary of Energy, US Department of Energy) promoted geothermal expansion and announced 171.5 million dollars funding for reservoir characterization and pilot demonstrations.
- Ron Wyden pressed Steve Pearce on his past statement that most Western public lands are unneeded, questioning his fitness to lead BLM.
- Republicans praised local input and energy dominance while Democrats warned against public land sales and discriminatory freezing of wind and solar permitting.
- Committee will weigh confirmations shaping management of 245 million public acres, DOE energy research, and FERC grid reliability amid rising electricity demand.
Morning digest
Get hearings like this in your inbox
Transcript
Order of the Senator, uh, Lee will be here momentarily. Uh, good morning. Welcome to all of you. Today we will hear from three exceptional Americans nominated for senior positions in the administration, one for each of the three agencies under this committee's jurisdiction. The nominees are the Assistant Secretary of Energy, Kild Hosswit, the, to be the Under-Secretary of Energy for the Department of Energy, Commissioner David Lissert, nomina- re-nominated to another term as Commissioner for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and Congressman Steve Pierce to be the Director of the Bureau of Land Management of the Department of Interior. I want to thank President Trump for sending all of these qualified nominees. Uh, we do have Senator Lummis here, who's going to make an introductory statement for, uh, former Congressman Steve Pierce. And we're so delighted to have you. I know you're on a tight schedule, so we would, in the interest of time, turn directly to you, Senator Lummis.
Out of order.
Well, thank you kindly to my dear colleague from Wyoming, Senator John Barrasso, and uh thank you committee for uh allowing me to introduce to you uh my friend and former colleague Steve Pearce as nominee for director of the Bureau of Land Management. And I'll tell you absolutely without a doubt there is just no better person for this job than Steve Pearce. Uh, Steve and I served together in the United States House of Representatives. We worked side by side on natural resource issues that are vital to our Western states. And I got to see firsthand how he operates. He fights for his constituents. He listens to his constituents. He's one of those rare uh Republicans who served in a bright blue state. And the way he got elected was by constantly going and listening to his constituents, not just showing up during election years, but showing up every weekend for family events in the communities that he represented. And he, it was, it was such a unique way that he had secret sauce. uh in his district that it was even featured in the Wall Street Journal, how he got elected. He is very attuned to the people he represents. He fights for his constituents. When New Mexicans needed people in their corner, he showed up every time. So after decades of serving the people in New Mexico, Steve came away from this town with an understanding that a lot of people lack and that's how the decisions that are made here work on the ground, how they land in ranching communities, energy producing counties, tribal nations and rural economies. He doesn't see the Bureau of Land Management as a line item in the federal budget. He sees it as boots on the ground in communities that depend on how their land is managed, you know, over time. Uh, it's getting to be that fewer and fewer people even know what BLM stands for. One night I was watching TV and they said, " OK, our next guest is the head of the BLM." And I thought, " Oh my gosh, we're making news." Little did I know that the next person to be on the screen was the head of Back, Black Lives Matter. And I never thought about them as, uh, acronyms that represented such different things to such a different audience. And that's why it's so important to have someone at the helm at the BLM who really understands the boots on the ground, the difference between BLM land and National Park Service land, and uh US Fish and Wildlife Service lands. Very different purposes for our wilderness areas than our BLM land, very different applications. of things like Flitmore the past in the mid seventies. And right now you're facing a nominee who understands those differences and is truly capable of implementing the law, the way it was designed. And while Steve Pierce is a fighter, I can also tell you he's genuinely kind and thoughtful. We used to sit next to each other on the floor of the house. We both have a love of the Tao Society of Artists. And one day I looked over and he was flipping through the artists that he and I both love and share and collect. And it became one of those wonderful uh relationships you have with another member who has an interest outside of uh the immediacy of what we deal with. It was Sorry. Uh it was Such fun, because so many of the things depicted by those artists are the land, the scenery, the sky, the water, the air that is subsumed on our BLM lands. So we've shared many memories in our time in the house. I love his dry sense of humor. Um, it is, it gives a lighter air to the contention of our jobs. And when things got tough, he, he keeps showing up. He doesn't turn away from those uncomfortable dialogues. He keeps listening. And he found ways to work across the aisle to get things done. That's exactly the kind of leadership BLM needs. Steve holds a core belief I share. The people who live and work on our Western lands know better than the people here in Washington what they need and how they can, we c- how we can be good stewards of those lands. He believes strongly in respecting states and listening to local expertise. He knows that Washington should partner with, not dictate to Western communities. He knows responsible economic development can transform communities and live families while preserving these magnificent landscapes that we represent. You know, there's just no one better. to head the Bureau of Land Management. Steve Pearce has the experience, the vision, the tenacity, and the heart. This is a man with heart to do this job well. So I strongly support his nomination, and I urge my colleagues to confirm him. Mister Chairman, thank you so much.
Thank you, Senator Lemes. Uh, we're now gonna turn to Senator Hoven, and after that, Senator Heinrich and I will give our respective opening statements and we'll proceed from there. Senator Hoven.
Thank you, Mister Chairman, and thanks to both you and uh, Ranking Member Heinrich. Appreciate you holding the uh, hearing today and I appreciate this opportunity to welcome Kyle Hausweit uh, back in front of this committee and it wasn't that long ago you were here, and you're back for very good reasons with a uh, I think uh, just a great decision uh, by President Trump to nominate you for this new role at the Department of Energy. Uh, Kyle served at the DOE with distinction. He was the Assistant Secretary for Hydrocarbons and Geothermal Energy. And, uh, doing a great job in that role. And we've worked closely with him, so I know that firsthand. Uh, and his background in, in energy, uh, diverse, uh, whether it's fossil fuels, uh, but all types of energy, uh, really is, uh, impressive. And now he is nominated for the Under Secretary for Energy Slots, so the - the - the third ranking position, uh, in the Department of Energy, and is a great, uh, do a great job in that role, along with, uh, Chris Wright, who also I know personally and has done a fantastic job, and James Danley, who we all know from his time at the FERC. Uh, so just an outstanding team leading the Department of Energy. Also, congr- uh, welcome And congratulations to Bria, his wife, and four children. I think they're all, I see three. I'm missing one. But, uh, he's
Nevaeh.
Oh, they're, oh, she's, yes. My gosh, she is a young lady. I missed that. It, are, are you, Neva, am I saying that right?
Nevaeh.
Nevaeh. Well, welcome to you. I'll bet you're a good babysitter for the other three. I'm just guessing. Yeah. Uh, Harper, Noah, and Hudson. So welcome to all you guys. Hudson, what happened to your wrist? Huh? You playing some sports? Oh, OK. I know how that goes. Um, Brea's from Canberra, so that's not too far where I grew up, northwest of Minot there, so.
So.
Uh, you have a beautiful family. And, um, I guess you're, you're, uh, you better, Kyle, Kyle, you gotta be on your game, man, cuz it sounds like the parents are watching, uh, remotely, your parents, Tom and Donna. And, uh, grandparents, Dewey and Phyllis, so you're gonna really have to be on your game today, man. Um, but again, uh, congratulations to them as well. Born in Fargo, we love that, uh, and, uh, raised in Tioga. So, again, another person from Northwest North Dakota, like, like myself and your wife. And, uh, grew up living in the energy economy in the Williston Basin. So, I mean, i- it's in his blood. Uh, third generation energy worker. Petroleum engineer by training. Uh, but, uh, innovator and a problem solver. Uh, co- he, uh, invented a patented hydraulic fracturing technique, uh, that's now used across multiple shale basins, and, uh, and technology that, uh, as both the Chairman and Ranking Member know have been incredible in unlocking, um, energy from shale across the, the nation, both oil and, uh, natural gas. And what we've been working on, uh, what we call in North Dakota Crack the Code-two. So Crack to Code-one was when we figured out how to produce, um, oil and gas out of shale economically. Obviously we knew we could do it from a technological standpoint for years, but the key was making it commercially viable. And, uh, we worked on that actually back during my days as Governor in that two thousand time frame and of course with directional drilling and hydraulic fracturing now, uh, you know, we've unlocked the shale plays not only the in the Bakken but in Texas, permian basin and the eagle ford as and in new mexico in a big way and of course the marcellus up in this part of the country so it's it's absolutely been a revolution in terms of energy for the country now crack the code two point O is using enhanced oil recovery to double that production and we're gonna do it even cynthia in places like wyoming if you can imagine that it's a big deal
it's a big deal
and kyle understands this at the level that is gonna enable us to crack that code a second time and it has huge ramifications for our country and that's why it's so important he's been nominated for this position of leadership at the Department of Energy. So uh with that, again thank you um, Mister Chairman and ranking member for the opportunity to uh introduce, Kyle Hauswein.
Thanks so much, Senator Hoven, and uh uh thank you, Senator Lomas, for joining us. Uh we could go ahead and have the witnesses make their way to the table now and um but be- before we start with you, you Go ahead and have a seat now. Senator Heinrich and I will now give our respective opening statements. Today's nominees have, uh, been nominated to positions and have a lot of challenges before them. And well, they'll face monumental tasks and, um, stakes that go beyond the responsibilities and the duties of just in a one agency. They go to a basic question. Can the United States govern its resources in a way that's capable of meeting the moment? Electricity demand is rising at a pace that we haven't seen in decades. Data centers, advanced computing, and the return of domestic manufacturing are pushing our grid to its limits. Wide stretches of the American West are under federal management. and decisions made in Washington can make or break the communities that surround those lands. Our foreign adversaries recognize the implications that are at play. They're expanding their production and strengthening their control over mineral supply chains. In past years, we watched the Biden regime partner with the progressive environmental lobby to willfully ignore some of those realities and instead layer on rules holding American-made energy hostage for unrealistic, unachievable environmental objectives. Domestic energy production was blocked at every turn, and we became dangerously reliant on foreign supply chains from adversarial countries that aren't, to say the least, all that interested in seeing America succeed. Rather than treating American energy and mineral resources as strategic assets, they instead treated them as liabilities to be phased out. and to be kept in the ground in perpetuity. We saw a governing philosophy that ignored the people most directly affected by their decisions. Local officials, county commissioners, tribal leaders, and small businesses showed up, offered their expertise, and then watched painfully as the final outcome bore little resemblance to what they put on the record. That approach deepened distrust and deeply damaged the relationship between Washington and communities throughout America that were forced to live, with consequences made hundreds, sometimes thousands of miles away. Each of you, if confirmed, uh, uh, for the position for which you've been nominated, uh, e- each of you will have tasks before you that that involve reversing that course. At the Bureau of Land Management, that means, uh, administering some two hundred and forty-five million acres public land and seven hundred million acres of mineral estate under multiple use and sustained yield mandates that have been outlaw uh outlined over the years by law uh by congress. And at the Department of Energy, that means overseeing the office's responsibility for electricity, nuclear energy, hydrocarbons, geothermal, cyber security, the strategic petroleum reserve and the emergency grid authorities congress has provided under the Fe- Federal Power Act. And at FERC, it means exercising regulatory judgment over interstate transmission, wholesale markets, natural gas infrastructure, and the orders that shape investment across our entire economy. What matters now is how that authority will be exercised. Will America's resources be developed here at home? Or will we be forced to rely on foreign competitors? Will communities have a genuine seat at the table, or will they simply be notified after the fact uh that their concerns have been disregarded? I look forward to hearing from each of you on how you'll intend to carry out the duties and the responsibilities of uh the respective offices uh uh to which you've been nominated. Thank you. And uh, Chair now recognizes uh Senator Heinrich, the ranking member of this committee.
Thank you, Chairman. The committee has previously considered nominations for two of the nominees before us this morning. Uh, the Senate confirmed Mister Haustveit's nomination to be the Assistant Secretary of Energy for Fossil Energy last September, and Mister Lissert's nomination to serve the final year remaining on a vacant seat on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. But the committee still has an obligation to examine Mister Haustveit's qualifications for the broader responsibilities that he will, have if confirmed to be the Under Secretary of Energy, and we must consider whether Mister Lucert has earned an additional five-year term on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Uh, our third nomin- nominee poses a somewhat, uh, greater challenge for us. Uh, Congressman Pierce, uh, who I've long known and often worked with, has been nominated to be the Director of the Bureau of Land Management. If confirmed, he will become the Steward of more than two hundred and forty-four million surface acres of public land, and another seven mil- uh, seven hundred million acres of sub-surface minerals. The Federal Land Policy and Management Act, the law that established the Bureau of Land Management, prescribes how the director is to perform his important duties. It says that he is to manage the lands and resources under his jurisdiction as public lands. They belong to the public. not to any special interest, but to the American people as a whole, and not to our generation alone, but to future generations as well. The public lands charter calls for them to be managed for fish and wildlife, as well as for energy and mineral production, for recreation, as well as resource development. Their value is to be measured not in economic returns or unit output alone, but also in the intangibles of scenic, scientific, historic, and archaeological re- uh values. Uh, a friend of mine, uh, likes to describe pol- public lands as the anvil on which our collective Western identity was forged. I think that kind of sums it up. Uh, the Federal Land Policy and Management Act says that our public lands are to be retained in federal ownership, and managed to best meet the present and future needs of the American people, and where appropriate, preserved and protected in their natural condition without permanent impairment. The act tells us that the director must be someone who will carry out these functions, and perform these duties in accordance with these principles. Uh, Congressman Pierce has had a long career in public life, and he is well known to many of us. He served seven terms in the House of Representatives, and three terms as the head of the Republican Party in my home state of New Mexico. As a public official, he's cast many votes and made many public statements. Some of these positions that he has taken, um, he called for the selling off of public lands. And that makes it challenging for n- for me to, uh, view his tenure, his potential tenure at the BLM, as one of stewardship. And so my questions today will largely reflect not just those reservations, but the conversations that we had in my office yesterday, Congressman. And it is, of course, the President's prerogative to nominate who he wants, but it is also the responsibility of those of us on this committee to assess uh Mister Pierce's nomination and to recommend whether or not the Senate should confer him in. For much of our nation's history, our predecessor committee proudly bore the title " the Public Lands Committee". Oversight of the public lands was our original purpose, and it remains one of our foremost responsibilities. To discharge this trust, we depend heavily on the dedicated public servants at the Bureau of Land Management. who devote their careers and their lives to the care of our public lands. And we depend on the Director of the Bureau to carry out the functions of his office in accordance with our laws and with FLITMA. Our hearing today is Con- Congressman Pierce's opportunity to make his case for his nomination and to share his vision of how he would manage the public lands if confirmed and to allay our concerns. Uh, I look forward to hearing from him. Thank you.
Thank you very much, Senator Hunter. OK, um, our fir- first witness today, um, uh, will be the Honorable Kyle Hossfite of North Dakota, nominated to be the Undersecretary of Energy. That's the third highest ranking officer in the Department of Energy with broad jurisdiction over many offices and programs at the Department of Energy. He currently serves as the Assistant Secretary of Energy for Hydrocarbons and Geothermal Energy, a position to which the Senate confirmed him last year. And in that position he currently already plays a a leading role in investing in research development and implementation of fossil fuel derived projects in strengthening American energy dominance and critical mineral supply. Uh, he is um, uh, prior to his current service, Mister Haasveit worked on energy issues in the private sector. and he's a graduate of Montana Technical University at the, and uh, the University of Oklahoma. Our second witness today is the Honorable David Lussert of Louisiana, nominated, re-nominated uh, to his current position as Commissioner of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Burke of course is charged with developing electricity and natural gas at reasonable prices and has jurisdiction over interstate electricity transmission and wholesale electricity sales as well as interstate transportation and sales of natural in addition to regulating hydroelectric facilities. Mister Lissert is also no stranger to this committee, as he too was confirmed uh to his current post uh uh by this committee and by the senate uh just a few months ago. He's got a distinguished career at both uh uh federal and state levels in government. Um in addition to his deployment a as a United States Marine in Afghanistan. Mister LeCert is a lawyer. Uh, he's served as a lawyer at, uh, among other things at Baker Botts and graduated from Nichols State University and Louisiana State University. Our final witness today is, of course, the Honorable Steven Pierce of New Mexico, nominated to be the Director of the U. S. uh, Bureau of Land Management, or BLM, within the Department of the Interior. Congressman Pierce has a long record of public service representing New Mexico's second congressional districts, i- in the House of Representatives for fourteen years. Part of that, he served in the New Mexico State Legislature. He also served as a pilot in the Air Force during Vietnam, where he was decorated for his actions during combat missions. He's a graduate of New Mexico State University and Eastern New Mexico University. His service as an elected official from a Western state provides him with the necessary experience and expertise uh to run a BLM. Uh, before the witnesses begin their testimony, I'll square them in. So if each of you will, uh, please stand and raise your right hand. Do you solemnly swear that the testimony you're about to give to the committee will be the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth?
I do. I do.
Let the record reflect that each uh witness responded in the affirmative. You may be seated. Also, it is the committee's practice to ask the following three questions of all three nominees who appear before us for confirmation. First, will you be available uh to appear before this committee and other congressional committees? to represent the positions of your agency and respond to issues of concern to Congress. Yes. All three witnesses responded in the affirmative. Second, are you aware of any personal holdings, investments, or interests that could constitute a conflict of interest or create the appearance of such a conflict of interest, should you be confirmed and assume the office
No.
to which you've been nominated? No. All three witnesses responded in the negative. And third, are you involved in or do you have any assets in a blind trust?
No.
All three witnesses responded in the negative. With that, I'll now uh uh invite each of the nominees to offer their opening statements, and to introduce uh their uh guests with them if they choose to do so. We'll begin uh with Secretary Haas-Fey.
Chairman Lee, Ranking Member Heinrich, and Distingu- Distinguished Members of the Committee, thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today. I'm deeply honored to be considered for the role of Undersec- I want to express my sincere gratitude to President Trump for my nomination, and to Energy Secretary Wright for his support. Thank you to Senator Hoeven for the kind introduction. Thank you to my family and friends here with me today, and those watching online. Here with me is my high school sweetheart, best friend and wife, Bria, our four children, Nevaeh, Harper, Noah, and Hudson, along with several close friends. Thank you all for your love and support. I wanna give thanks to my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, for his grace and guidance in this journey. I was born and raised in North Dakota, just a few miles from the historic Williston Basin discovery well. My family's roots run deep in both energy and agriculture. One grandfather managed drilling operations while the other farmed her family homestead, where he and my grandma still live today. Growing up, I've found appreciation for both industries and the critical role energy plays in modern agriculture, from fueling tractors to providing the fertilizers that nourish our crops. I'm proud to say that I'm a third-generation energy worker. My family's connection to energy spans decades, and their hard work instilled in me a deep respect for the industry and its importance to our nation. With a small nudge from my late grandfather, I pursued a degree in petroleum engineering at Montana Tech. followed by an MBA in energy from the University of Oklahoma. This combination of engineering and economic study has been instrumental in shaping my career and preparing me to address the challenges and opportunities in the energy sector. Early in my career, I was fortunate to lead a team that invented and commercialized a diagnostic technique now used globally to optimize hydraulic fracturing and resource development. This experience sparked a growing passion for energy and technology. which led me to leading an energy ventures team. In this role, our team had the privilege of investing in early stage technologies rooted in fundamental science including a leading next generation geothermal company with operations in Nevada and a five hundred megawatt development underway in Utah. Our team also conducted technical evaluations for innovative projects such as direct lithium extraction from brine in Arkansas and California. carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration in Wyoming, and produced water treatment and beneficial reuse in New Mexico. These experiences have given me a front-row seat to the incredible innovation happening in our energy industry across our resource-rich nation. I've been blessed to build my career during one of the most transformative periods in energy history, the shale revolution. The shale revolution, brought about by industry, and enabled by part from fundamental research from our tremendous national laboratories. This technological breakthrough moved the US from the world's largest importer of LNG to the world's largest exporter, positioning us as the global leader in oil and natural gas production, transforming us from energy dependent to energy dominant. The energy industry has not only powered our nation, but it has also fueled economic growth, strength in national security, and improve the quality of life for millions of Americans and our allies around the world. US natural gas has delivered affordable, reliable and secure energy, and at the same time reduced the emissions from electricity generation by more than forty percent. It has been a privilege to contribute to this progress, and I am passionately aligned with President's, President Trump's common sense energy agenda. an agenda that will ensure that future generations have access to affordable, reliable, secure, and abundant energy made in America. If confirmed, I will honor the fundamentals of science and economics to serve our country. I'm committed to advancing policies that unleash US energy dominance, foster innovation, and ensure that America remains a global leader in energy production and technology. If confirmed, I will work to leverage the incredible talents within DOE in our national laboratories to drive forward cutting edge research and development. It's an honor of a lifetime to contribute to the mission of the President and the Secretary, to fuel peace and prosperity through energy. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your questions.
Thank you, Assistant Secretary Haasbeit, Commission, assert. Chairman Lee, Ranking Member Heinrich, and distinguished members of the committee, good morning. I'm grateful for the opportunity to appear before you again today. Thank you to President Trump for renominating me to serve a full term on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and thank you to this committee for your time. Thank you to my family who are at home today in Louisiana. Public service can be a tremendous burden, and this burden disproportionately falls not on the appointee but on their loved ones. Thank you for the grace you continue to give me while I serve the American people. I'd like to briefly speak to our accomplishments since I've been seated at FERC, my commitments made to you in the fall, and address what you can expect to see from me if I am given the honor of serving a full term as Commissioner. At my first open meeting we proposed rulemakings to expand the successful pipeline certification program to both hydroelectric and liquified natural gas facilities. We prioritized cutting red tape, advancing stalled projects, and ensuring that permits are issued in a timely and legally defensible manner. I want to pause on LNG for a moment. Utilizing our vast natural resources is not just an economic advantage, it's a geopolitical necessity. that ensures our allies are fueled by reliable American energy, rather than the coercion of our adversaries. Critical to this goal was maintaining and developing a robust export infrastructure here in the US, a mission-critical task that I am focused on achieving. I have also been very vocal about the need to declutter the Commission's dockets. Proceedings that linger for years serve no one. They create uncertainty for investors, delay critical infrastructure, and erode confidence in the regulatory process. Since my first month, I have supported action to remove outdated regulations and issue timely orders. And I will continue striving for more efficient and disciplined processes at FERC. In our second month, we demonstrated our commitment to powering America's leadership in artificial intelligence and advanced technologies, while protecting rate payers. This may be the defining competitive challenge of our generation. If we are not the world's leader in AI, our adversaries surely will be. We need to meet this moment and we will do so without sacrificing affordability. In December, we issued an order addressing service to large load, including data centers, co-located with generating facilities, through revisions to PJM's tariff. I recognize this represents a first step in a very long road, but I'm proud of the decisive action the commission took. At a time when energy demand is rising and reliability challenges are mounting, the commission has acted with focus and disciplined urgency. Year to date, we have already issued eighteen percent more orders over the same time period in twenty twenty five. Since I've joined the commission, we have voted in nearly three hundred proceedings and authorized the addition of four point one four million decaherbs of natural gas transportation capacity, enough to support the electricity needs of thirteen to eighteen million American households. That pace will accelerate as we move distract- remove distractions and focus on what matters within our statutory jurisdiction. By narrowly focusing on that jurisdiction, we are building, We are advancing, and we are strengthening energy security for our nation. I made commitments to these senators across the aisle about how I would approach this work and I welcome accountability for those commitments. For my first open meeting, I stated plainly, " My duty is to the ratepayer." There are always people looking to curry favor for one project or one industry, and I meant what I said. None of those people represent the ratepayer. I do. My commitment to the ratepayer is not wavered, and this commitment will not relent for as long as I have the privilege to serve. On affordability and reliability, I'm fully all in. Growth must not come at the expense of ordinary Americans already concerned about their energy bills. It is our duty as commissioners to fully protect ratepayers from undue costs and to power American industry through low growth and re-industrialization. We can do both, and we must do both. In the fall, this body asked me to commit to resource neutrality as required by the law. I have demonstrated that commitment, and I'll continue to do so. This body also asked me to commit to upholding FERC's independence. I'll always uphold that commitment. The value of this commission to markets, to investors, and to the American public depends on its credibility as an independent decision-making and rate-setting body. FERC's decisions are subject to judicial review by the courts, and I will ensure those decisions are respected and carried out in the interest of the people in accordance with the law. Will I continue to seek input from all stakeholders? Absolutely. Sound decisions require broad engagement. But consultation does not compromise independence. My duty is to the law and to the statutory responsibilities entrusted to the Commission. We have several monumental challenges facing our grid, any which would be generational in nature. I'm confident that we can empower American innovation to see us through these challenges to the more efficient, more powerful, and more affordable grid of tomorrow. Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to your questions.
Thanks, Commissioner. We'll hear now from Congressman Pierce.
Uh, good morning and thank you, Chairman Lee and Ranking Member Heinrich for your leadership.
It's it's your uh, it's your microphone, Bud McKay. Yes, thanks.
Good morning and uh thank you, Chairman Lee and Ranking Member Heinrich for your leadership on this committee. I'm deeply grateful for the support of my family, friends who are with us today or watching on C-SPAN. I especially want to recognize my strong and amazing wife, Cynthia, our daughter, Lori, our grandson, Preston, his wife, Erin, our granddaughter, Olivia, and my brother, Greg. I'm honored to be nominated by President Trump to serve as the Director of the Bureau of Land Management. Growing up in a large family on a small five-acre farm, the New Mexico farm, the concept of preserving and conserving the land and water was instilled in me through necessity and it was refined by the training I received in four H. During my years at New Mexico State University, I worked every holiday and summer in the oil fields to pay for college. In my junior year, I won the draft lottery and got free flying lessons in an After graduation I went straight to USAF pilot training. Then my first assignment was flying combat missions in Vietnam in nineteen seventy-one, seventy-two and seventy-three, where I earned a distinguished flying cross and multiple air medals, and developed a love for veterans in aviation that exists today still. In twenty sixteen, while still a member of Congress, I flew my single-engine four-seat Mooney's aircraft solo, circumnavigating the globe in fifteen days. dedicating the effort to the warriors who never made it home. I continued to fly and work for veterans today. When I got back from Vietnam, I experienced the healing serenity of backpacking in wilderness areas across the country in nineteen eighty-one I married my wife Cynthia and together we bought a small struggling oil field service business and for fourteen years I learned the art of repairing problem oil wells. We were basically plumbers working five thousand feet deep. fit well with the values with which I was raised, work hard, treat others fairly, provide good customer service. We sold the business in two thousand three. I served seven terms representing the second district of New Mexico, a majority minority district which was thirty-four percent registered Republicans. The district was seventy thousand square miles, larger than the state of Florida with about one third of the state being federal land. The second district provided many examples of what multiple use means. hunting and access, and outdoor sports are drivers of one local economy. In another area, oil and gas provide the jobs, yet another has national parks and monuments. The district had mining, grazing, forest, wildfires, wilderness areas, and was home to Native American Pueblos, tribes, and chapter houses. Much of my life is a life of service, and I'm proud of that. During my fourteen years as a congressman, I traveled the district extensively, seeing firsthand the problems faced by my constituents who, like my parents, work hard every day trying to provide their for their families. I also saw what the founding fathers feared, a federal government acting as an absentee landlord, which instead of partnering with with states and local communities, rules over them. After a devastating wildfire, the Forest Service assigned local ranchers in my district to grazing lands as far away as Wyoming. The cost of trucking cattle at distance would have led to the extinction of small ranchers and collapse of the local economy. My staff identified nearby allotments that had not been grazed for years, and lobbied the Forest Service to open those. The agency initially stood its ground, but ultimately could not dispute the facts. The ranchers and the local economy survived. I was great- gratified to include funding in an early appropriation process to clean out the sediment threatening the health of Blue Hole of Santa Rosa, a popular recreational spring in the M- New Mexico desert. We got word shortly after that the agency had repurposed those funds. I'm proud of my efforts to claw the funds back, to clean out the spring for future future generations. These examples show uh my distinct dedication to working with local stakeholders and the federal government to ensure our land managers making decisions based on local input in accordance with the law. If confirmed, I fully intend to uphold these same principles as BOM Director, and ensure local input is a key factor in my decision making. I've also seen firsthand the importance of our public lands. and support those missions completely. I met many of the dedicated public servants who make the uh federal agencies work, and together we accomplished amazing things. When the lesser prairie chicken was at risk of being listed as endangered, my office worked with all the stakeholders to aco- to establish a voluntary process to increase habitat and prevent a listing. I believe that we can duplicate those efforts to solve not only endangered species, but orphaned wells, abandoned mines, and many issues, including providing clean and plentiful water. President Trump has proven we can achieve his vision of energy dominance by providing clean air, water and soil. We must preserve the natural spaces so that all people have access to the spiritual beauty of the outdoors where hunting and fishing can be passed down from one generation to the next where critical minerals can be developed freeing us from dependence on China and uh Native American lands and resources can be protected the security and economic health of the country, especially the Western states, rests squarely on the shoulders of the BLM, we can and must balance the different uses of public land. Local economies and future generations depend on us doing our job right. Thank you, and I look forward to your questions.
Thank you very much. We'll now begin our five-minute rounds of questions, uh, alternating between Republicans and Democrats in order of seniority, subject to the early bird rule. And, uh, we'll begin that now. Uh, uh, Assistant Secretary Haasveit, let's start with you. My state, uh, state of Utah has a enormous geothermal potential. And the office that you currently lead at the Department of Energy, um, funds geothermal research and development. Can you talk about some of the exciting work, uh, that has been going on in that office, the one that you currently lead, um, uh, when it comes to developing, commercializing geothermal power at scale?
Yes, Senator, thank you for the question. Uh, to start with, we share oftentimes that the problem statement for geothermal today is identical to that of the shale revolution twenty-five years ago.
Mm-hmm.
We have a vast resource in place that lacks the natural permeability to produce at commercial rates. That was the same problem statement for oil and gas twenty-five years ago. We solved that with horizontal wells and multi-stage stimulation. It's the same problem statement for geothermal today. and one of the methods to extract that resource is with horizontal wells and multi-stage hydraulic fracturing. A project in your home state, Forge, funded by the Department of Ener- Energy, was groundbreaking. It provided critical drilling information, which led to commercial leasing and now active development of a five hundred megawatt resource in southwest Utah. Along with that, just this morning we announced the department's largest ever funding opportunity for geothermal, a hundred and seventy-one and a half million dollars, focused on reservoir characterization and pilot scale demonstrations. On the resource characterization, what's important about that is the western part of the country is not as well explored as many of the shale basins. The shale basins had a benefit because most conventional basins exist on top of an unconventional shale. So we've drilled through these resources for over a hundred years, and with that we've logged it and we could map it. We lacked that information in the subsurface in the west. And that's part of the reason that one of our topic areas is to do exactly that, help support the industry in de-risking the resource and finding more hot rock that we can develop commercially. Our goal is to take geothermal out of the other bucket. When you look at the energy stack, you see this sliver of energy that sits on top of all the other primary energy sources. Our goal is to provide cost-competitive gigawatt scale power generation from the vast amounts of geothermal resource in the United States.
So your hope is that on those Western lands that are not as well known that haven't been as thoroughly explored to help replicate some of that so as to create the information necessary that would lead to more lease sales and more utilization for geothermal.
Yes, Senator, that's correct.
Thank you. Uh, commercial assert uh, natural gas is is the backbone of the modern electrical grid in America without access to natural gas, without access to, you know, very plentiful supplies, of natural gas at reasonable prices. There would have been widespread outages across the East Coast, uh, just during the most recent winter storm. We don't even have to go back more than a few days, uh, to cover that. Looking back at your first few months as a member of FERC, a- how has, uh, has FERC moved the needle on clearing the backlog for natural gas pipelines and LNG facilities? Nothing.
That's a great question, Senator. Thank you very much, and thank you for acknowledging the work that natural gas has done to keep the lights on, keep homes warm, and quite frankly save people's lives over the past several weeks, uh, as the most of the country have gone into a deep freeze, a really unprecedented deep freeze, um, where gas has really done all the heavy lifting. Um, and at FERC, I think you could see, I, I'd mentioned in my, in my opening, um, we've, we've approved more gas, uh, than the first four months during my tenure here than we have in quite a while. We're gonna continue to keep that work. We're gonna continue to right size NEPA under seven county. Uh, we're gonna continue to, um, to - to hold our states, um, to the fire and - and make sure they're making smart right decisions, um, for a lot of generation siting. And - and quite frankly, we need to focus more on natural gas as the reliable clean energy source that it is. And you're right, you could see moving up, up, up and down the east coast, the areas where they have an abundant supply of natural gas through our pipelines, fared much better than the areas that did not. So, we think that we're very blessed geologically in our country, um, to employ these molecules, to put them to work, and we need to do a better job of that across the board.
With those pipelines, I I completely agree, the uh pipeline infrastructure is essential to that. What do you see as the biggest obstacles slowing that and threatening the progress on that front?
Well, I think you see that here. I think we've struggled with the Clean Water Act certifications for quite a while. Um, I personally do not believe that one state should be able to hold the
Great. Thank you, Senator Heinrich. Thank you, Chairman. Uh, welcome to all of you. Uh, Congressman, I'm gonna start with you. And, um, when I looked at the - the, um, the constituent, uh, communication w- with respect to your nomination, there were sort of like two issues that dominate probably ninety plus percent of it. And we discussed these, uh, yesterday. Um, the first is just the, the, the issue of the potential broad scale divestment of public lands. And this is something that came up with, uh, Secretary Bergman, his nomination, uh, as well. And I think he did a good job of talking about how, um, the while it may be completely appropriate to divest of certain isolated parcels of public land for affordable housing and other public purposes, that there wouldn't be a broad scale, uh, selling off of the public lands. And because of some of your previous writings and statements, uh, there, there is a concern in the publicans, um, among New Mexicans that that a sale of public lands on a broader scale might be part of the the new BLM agenda. Can you speak to that and maybe allay some of those concerns?
Thank you, Senator. Thank you, Senator, and I appreciate uh the chance to talk about this. Uh, the the secretary has been uh very straightforward that he does not visualize any large scale uh sales of land. Flipman does not allow BLM to go in and the director of BLM to have these large scale sales. Um, that's something that, that frankly the isolated parcels, I would look to the members of this committee to identify those. I think that from my time in office, um, I know that, that I would have understood better than any director of BOM, the sensitivity of this piece of land or that piece of land. And so that's the reason when I say, um, I'll look to you all on that. Um, there is a, there is a, a monumental amount of work to be done. And and and again I would say gladly I would use the help that you all could provide in I identifying those parcels. But just to put it into context, when I first got to the state legislature, uh, Los Alamos, the home of the Los Alamos labs, was trying to get five acres and they'd been trying, they said, for years. I don't know if that's even occurred today, but when it didn't occur then, the the community was forced to move twenty miles down a mountain and form a community there people could afford to live. And then in the wintertime we'd lose two or three people who work at the labs every year, off those snow-covered passes. And that's, it's that kind of restrictive holding that, that I think that we're meant to address. But again,
Is where the focus should be.
I'd, I'd look, look to you all to provide that focus for the agency.
Uh, the other issue, and I've, I've got correspondence from a, a number of Las Cruces City Councillors, Mayor of Mesilla, Dona Count- Dona Ana County Commissioners, um, and state representatives and senators in southern New Mexico, as well as soil and water conservation district members, uh, is the issue of the - the future of the Oregon Mountains Desert Peaks National Monument. Uh, I know that there's a lot of water under the bridge on that issue between both of us. But, uh, what would you say to those elected officials in Dona Ana County about your approach uh with respect to the monument?
Uh, Senator, again, thanks for the opportunity to clarify that because, uh, that issue was - was very hotly contested in the county for about fifteen years, and eventually it was designated by executive order. Uh, I very rarely look in the rear-view mirror, and especially looking at this job and the - and the amount of work ahead of us. Uh, I don't anticipate going back and reviewing that. At the end of the day, it's a presidential decision anyway, um, but I don't - I don't view myself going in making a recommendation there is too much ahead of us to get done to focus on things that have happened in the past it's been recognized in operating
i appreciate that very much um i also wanna say how much i appreciate your interest in orphan wells and uh uh abandoned mines that that's a place where i think we can really build some bipartisan support for that kind of work and i look forward to uh uh uh continuing that conversation with you uh i'm gonna switch now to mister hausfeit and i'm gonna ask the same question that i that i asked your predecessor during his uh hearing about a year ago and that is would you agree that in this environment uh of increased demand probably the most increased demand we've seen since the invention of the the air conditioner um that we need an energy strategy that is focused on rapidly expanding production from all available sources, including things like renewables and storage.
Senator, thank you for the question. As we've seen in the last month or so, it's critical that we prioritize reliability. Uh, we've seen with the winter storm that when people need lights, they need heat, we need to make sure we've got the energy forms available to deploy on the grid. So I believe in the best of the above. Uh, not at all not all energy is created equally and not all energy types should be be
uh yeah and uh i i would agree with you that reliability is non-negotiable i will also point out that you know we've been able to develop a grid in new mexico that is uh incredibly clean and and more reliable than most in the country and yet also produces that energy at a price per kilowatt hour that is a lot lower than many places around the country. And, uh, I think I w- I hope that we can continue to see that kind of progress.
I look forward to working together. Thank you.
Senator Parasso.
Uh, thanks, Mr. Chairman. Uh, Congressman, great to see you again. I sure enjoyed working with you when we cha- when you chaired the congressional Western caucus. Congratulations to all three of you. I'd like to just start with you, though, because, uh, we worked together and we spoke yesterday in my office, specifically about the uh the BLM and the critical role it plays in the lifeblood of the economy of the state of Wyoming. Uh when you we had your nomina- when we had the nomination hearing in this room for secretary Burgum, uh I asked him a series of questions about the BLM and things and decisions related to Wyoming and I'm gonna ask you similar questions today about my home state. The uh specifically we talked yesterday about the Rock Springs RMP resource management plan. Uh we spoke in detail about it and It was something that the last administration came out with, rejected any input from the state of Wyoming, accepted comments from around the world, including apparently some from bots from China, and something that clearly the the last administration was promoting, that locked up millions of acres of land that local communities and the entire state relies upon. The governor, the state legislature, the county commissioners, the local communities all strongly opposed the plan. Uh, will you commit to working with my office and to the State of Wyoming to amend what I believe is a disastrous plan?
Absolutely, Senator. I think one of the more important elements of any plan is l- is local input. Custom and culture is known by the people who live in an area, uh, very seldom known by the people in Washington, and, uh, that is a strong commitment I make.
Uh, since you talk about the people that live locally, I think we're very fortunate in Wyoming to have field offices for the Bureau of Land Management uh throughout our state. This allows the federal agency to better serve our rural communities, and many of these offices are located near the natural resources all across the state where there where they have a oversight. The field offices are located in our more rural areas, directly near our agriculture and our energy uh interest in industries, Buffalo, Cody, New Castle, Pinedale. So I'm hearing from local leaders who would like to make sure that there is certainty for the next few years in terms of field offices will stay in these communities. So would you be willing to commit to working with my office to ensure longevity for our Wyoming field offices?
Absolutely, Senator, and again, my county is now the the highest well-producing county in the nation, and I we recognize the importance of having a close-by office to where you can take questions to them and get answers and so I absolutely commit to work with you on that.
Great. Um, Mr. Lissier, earlier this Ma- I guess earlier this month you appeared at the House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing uh in your testimony you stated that a big part of permitting delay results from permitting decisions that take too long uh and the leveraging of judicial review to create a th- uncertainty around project development. I mean fear, uncertainty and doubt are the things that stop things. Um delay is no longer the currency, it once was and we frankly can't afford these uh types of delays. In your view, what are the biggest obstacles to a more stable and timely
Thank you for the question. I think the Supreme Court did a, uh, went a long way in that with the unanimous decision in seven county last year. Uh, I think it, the unanimous nature of their decision speaks to the bipartisan nature of that NEPA has been uh running amok and is now uh had been, um, used to, to block projects rather than to review projects. I think that's step one. I think step two is we need to identify that the time is now to take action. I think that we've been sitting on a lot of projects for too long, whether they be in permitting, whether that be in interconnection, whether that be in siting. I think that we need to do a better job collaborating with our states to permit, site, and build more generation, and do a better job of building and progressing interstate pipelines. Um, and doing all of the above. I think that we need to do everything better. So narrowing it down to one issue, one fact pattern, I think would be foolish.
Good. Are there steps you've already taken since you've been on the, on the first?
Yes. So, we've uh, we've right-sized our own NEPA process, which is ongoing and continuous. This work is not a magic bullet. We're gonna continue to get more efficient, more effective. We're gonna continue to move projects faster, out of our queue. I know that a lot of things have languished over time. So, taking a look at what is on our docket, taking a look at what is within our jurisdiction, what is not, I think all these things are going to enable us to more narrowly focus, use staff more wisely, and get projects built.
Great. Thank you, Mister Chairman.
Senator Wyden.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Uh, Congressman, we don't know each other and, uh, didn't have a chance to visit, so I tend to look at documents, public documents, and what I have seen with respect to your views on selling off public lands doesn't really square with what I heard you say to my colleague here, so I wanna ask you about some of these, um, comments. Um, Not long ago you said with respect to public land located in Western States, and I'm a Westerner, you said, and I quote, " Most of it we do not even need." Now, my question to you then is is there too much public land in the West now, in your view, because that is a direct quote, a quote that you made in connection with some leadership matters previously. So, tell me how we square those two views, because that is a very blunt statement. With respect to public land in my state and in the West, quote, most of it we do not even need. So, is that something you said some time ago and you no longer believe? Or perhaps you could just make
Thank you, Senator, and I appreciate uh the question.
sense out of it. And w- pardon me one second. Um, Mr. Chairman, I would just ask that we put into the record at this point in the question some of the specifics that I'm asking about.
Without objection.
Excuse me.
So again, uh, Senator, thanks for the question. I look forward to visiting with you in your office and getting to know you and your state uh more personally. Uh, but the uh, the statement made there was when I was represented as a legislative uh person, uh a district that was I I think at odds with uh with federal agencies many times because the management uh of those lands is is uh sometimes not well done as it should be and local people pay the price. It cost them jobs, cost them their careers, cost them their land. And uh, so I spoke of of those frustrations. But uh, I don't uh, I as I expressed to Senator Heinrich, I don't visualize selling large swaths of land.
Well, let's let's be clear on this. You no longer uh, agree with the statement you made years ago that I quoted you on? Because people can change their mind. That, I I get that. Do you continue to hold that view or have you changed your mind about something that we're we're Westerners and we care about these kinds of things. So what's your thinking today?
Again, Senator, I uh I'm not so sure that I've changed, I'm not sure that that I was not speaking out of uh sheer frustration with an agency on behalf of the people who are being overwhelmed. So uh I do not believe that we're gonna go out and wholesale land from the federal government. Uh that again has been stated by by the uh the secretary and federal law says that uh that we can't do that from the blm itself
well with respect to that it's pretty hard for us to be able in the west to trust someone who fundamentally doesn't believe that these public lands are important i know you answered my colleague to the effect well we may not be able to do all the things that some people care about but you're gonna be in a position of great influence and i followed that i was chairman of this committee for some time before i went uh as a nurse and and i i wanna know somebody say,
no the i have i'm
you know that really was extreme i don't believe that anymore and what you said to me just now is well i'm kind of frustrated about it back then and we'll try to work something out now and i just will tell you i think we've gotta do better.
no it's i it's thank you senator and uh i absolutely believe in the public lands and the I think that, that one of the most important things just in my personal life, uh, was the, the hikes that we would go on. Uh, we, our family would go to Tucson and, uh, my granddaughter sitting behind me was about five or six. She was the only one in the family who would get up early and say, I'm gonna go walk at five if you wanna be, uh, be out there if you wanna go with me, and she would. And that was really, uh, special time. So I recognized the importance of the, of the, uh, federal lands and support the missions completely. I do not believe that uh we have too much federal land uh sitting in public hands. I know that it creates great stress in the west to have these lands managed from Washington. That I do know.
That last statement indicates your change in your views, so I wanna have some more conversation. If you are, that's a different uh story because these are are treasures and I look at your career and these documents because we didn't you know know each other and You've made something of a career out of supporting the selling off of public lands, and I wanna know if you're changing your position, and, uh, my door will be open to talk further. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Thank you, Senator Wyden. Uh, it's important for us to remember that current federal law doesn't allow this. It does not allow the mass sale of, uh, federal public lands. And so, uh, you know, e- absent an act of Congress authorizing such a thing, uh, the question is moot and, um, Uh, Congressman Pierce has noted this point repeatedly and, uh, has, um, acknowledged that he'll follow up the law.
Mr. Chairman, just very briefly, I had about ten more seconds.
Yep. Go ahead.
I think my concern is that when we have these smaller, you know, parcels and the like, which can be sold, that's what concerns me and I look forward to continuing the conversation.
Great. Thank you. Senator Rish.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Uh, Mr. Hausweit, Thank you for agreeing to meet with me. We're gonna meet a little later today. Uh, we have the advantage of, uh, you having performed, and I hear nothing but good things. Looking forward to talking with you. Um, and, uh, Mister, uh, Lissert, same thing with you. Uh, you've had a year over there and I hear nothing but good uh good things about your service there. So it's always good to have this when we're voting on a confirmation to see, uh, uh, to have a background, uh, where people have served in that position. So Uh, to both of you, thank you for your service. Um, Mister Pears, thank- thank you for meeting with me, and, uh, ye- uh, y- you know I'm, uh, a one issue guy on - on your, uh, appointment. And, uh, uh, I - I want to, uh, I want to stress for people watching this today that we're talking about a job, uh, that you're appointed to, to manage the BLM. And I stress manage the BLM. The policy regarding the BLM you understand is the purview of this body and the body you formerly served in. You you agree with me on that?
I do, Senator.
And, uh, we we had a, uh, good discussion along the lines that Senator Lee, uh, just underscored, and that is that there is no authority, uh, for you, uh, for that matter, for the president, uh, to sell off public lands. You you agree with that?
I agree with that, Senator.
Um, and as I explained to you, uh, Uh, this is a ninety-eight percent issue in Idaho. Uh, in all my decades of serving the state, I've never received such passionate and unified messages as I have on this particular, uh, topic. Idahoans do not want their public lands sold, period, full stop. Uh, public lands are, uh, really part of us, they are really sacred to us. So, a- any hint, uh, that that could happen really raises the ire uh of uh Idaho people. And uh look it's more than that, it's personal to me. My undergraduate degree was in forestry uh with studies in uh in uh range management and wildlife management. And I did that because I love the public lands. So it is very personal to me. And let me tell you some experience we've had in Idaho. And it's uh although not wide spread, uh the examples were were very concerning to us. for years and years, two-thirds of the state of Idaho is owned by the federal government, and managed either by the forest service or by - by BLM. And, uh, for years and years, there were some blocks that were owned by some of the timber companies, most notoriously, uh, uh, was, uh, Potlatch, uh, and Boise Cascade. They were great neighbors. Uh, the - you didn't know whether you were on a - a piece of forest service land or whether you were on a piece of, uh, uh, of their land. Uh, but, as you know, they went through the REIT reorganizations and as a result, those blocks of land changed hands and went into private sector, uh, for, uh, from people, uh, outside the state. What we wound up with was gates, fences, no p- trespassing signs, and I'll tell you, this is incredibly upsetting to people who have used a piece of land for, uh, opening day of elk season for generations. They've set up camp and now, now they couldn't. Now, again, that was not widespread, but it gave us a glimpse as to what could happen and very possibly would happen if these lands were sold off. So we're out. We don't want that. We don't want anything to do with that. And, uh, I appreciate your stating to me, and I hope you'll state it again publicly, that you understand that the job you're being appointed to, uh, regards the management of these public lands, which I think you're very qualified to do. But as far as uh a uh wholesale sell-off of that, you have nothing to do about it, no matter what you thought about it, there'd be no way you could uh get this done without the concurrence uh of the United States Congress which I can tell you is extremely unlikely at this point. It, it, your thoughts.
Thank you, uh, Senator, I again appreciate the time that we were able to spend in your office, and I came away with a very clear understanding of your position. It's uh one of the points that I made to Senator Heinrich that that is uh when it comes to distribution of land, I look to you all to provide the the groundwork. Uh you all will know your state, you'll know the parcels of land much better than uh people in Washington. And so that's that's my commitment to you, that we'll work with you on and follow the law completely.
Well, we we appreciate that, and I would say this, that uh so there is a clear understanding here uh this uh isolated parcels that are very small parcels that are sometimes needed for hospitals or for schools or what have you uh this committee well i have been on it uh has approved i think thousands of those sales over the years but they are very very small pieces and i have never seen a uh a whole sale sell off of a large tract of land. And i know of no uh suggestions right now that that should happen so i appreciate your understanding that you're center to manage the land and this other issue, which is a huge issue, uh, is not one that we're gonna have to be worried about at this time. So, with that, thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Thank you. Senator King.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Congressman Pierce, I'm sure it feels weird to be on that side of the dais, but, uh, so far you're holding up
A little bit strange, but we're holding up,
You're holding up quite well.
if you're asking.
Thank you. Um, uh, I want to change the subject, uh, to - to - to energy. Uh, the public lands, of course, have enormous energy potential in a whole host of areas. My concern is that the administration seems to have made a decision that fossil fuel extraction on public lands is OK, renewables not so much. In fact, there's now a rule that every renewable project, whether it's wind or solar, has to go directly to the secretary for his approval. This doesn't apply to fossil plants. The chairman has made the point in f- prior hearings, we're facing a two percent a year increase in which is unprecedented. Compounded in ten years, that's a thirty percent increase in demand. How do we, how are we gonna get there by eliminating a significant source of energy, uh, from, from consideration? And the other side of this question is, how will people feel on your side of the fence in two, four, six, eight years when it's reversed and all fossil fuel plants have to go through some kind of special extra review that never results in any any permits. Uh, do you see what I'm saying, I mean, uh, I would I would be fine if we were talking, OK, we're gonna review all projects on public land, but to say we're gonna only review uh, renewable plants and not fossil fuel plants, uh, strikes me as A, not in the public interest because we need that electricity, and B, it establishes a terrible precedent for the federal even-handed regulation, if you will, of energy sources.
Uh, Senator, appreciate, uh, the question. The, uh, the answer, uh, is, comes down to the fact that, that I will be working for the President and for the Secretary. Uh, that doesn't mean that I won't, uh, visit with you, figure out what your, your issues are, and take those and represent them.
Yeah, but you're gonna be a Policy Advisor. You're gonna be the Head of Public Lands. And, uh, we're talking about development on public lands. I s- presume somebody's gonna ask you your opinion. Do you think it's a good idea to basically say we can do one kind of development on public lands, and not another. And by the way, do you know if there's any legal authority for that kind of distinction?
Well, I'm not yet in the, in the position, I don't have access to all the information that's there. It's a, it's a conversation I'm uh more than willing to have with you and with the administration. But, but I don't know the rationale, don't know the law regarding it, be happy to investigate that to its fullest.
Well, one of the problems with this, and, and it, you know, the, the prior administration had different policies, is what I'm calling the whiplash effect. where the law and, and, and procedure and rules and regulations change dramatically from one administration to the other. And the result to that is business doesn't have the confidence to invest. Because when you're talking about a multi-million dollar, perhaps billion dollar investment in an energy facility, you need to know that the rules will be the same when you get to the end of that process. So, I hope you will take this into consideration, and also I'm gonna be pursuing the question of what is the legal authority that the secretary has to abricate uh an unto himself this uh a essentially a new permitting review of review for certain kinds of energy projects uh and not for for uh some others. Mister Lester first I wanna thank you because you have kept your promise. You have worked on the FERC in the in the prior months uh in a bipartisan way. The FERC is working I think very effectively and I think you've you've met the representations that you made were here, here before. This energy demand that I mentioned is not only on the, on the capacity side, but it's on the grid side. We're gonna need huge, uh, investments in, in the expansion of the capacity of the grid. We need to use the grid more efficiently. The grid is like a church that's built only for Christmas and Easter.
Mm-hmm.
There are a lot of empty pews in February and June. It is. And we gotta figure out how to use this thing more efficiently rather than dump in billions of dollars which are gonna go right to the rate payers. And I'm, what I'm getting at is gets. Technologies that will enable us to increase the throughput of the grid without new pole, without new poles, without new rights away. Perhaps reconductoring, but also dynamic line rating. I hope this is a priority for FERC because you you said a few minutes ago and i loved it when you said it i represent the rate payers and as you know transmission and distribution is now fifty percent of most electric bills it when i can remember when it was twenty five or thirty percent and it's getting higher so tell me how you feel about gets
yeah thank you first um i sit in the
that's grid enhancing technologies that's what g. e. t. s. stands for go ahead
thank you senator you know i sit in the church pews of firk everyday much more so than my home pews of my home parish back home uh sad to say Um, but, but you're, I think you're right. I think we need to squeeze every megawatt out of the existing grid that we can. Whether that's dynamic front-line ratings, whether that's grid enhancing technologies of any type, but I can't endorse one over another. I think we need to do a much better job of being efficient with the grid that we have, in addition to building new transmission. So you're gonna see more from me in those coming months in that regard.
I, I, I appreciate that and I'm, uh, I'm out of time, but Mister, uh, Hausweit, what I'm particularly concerned is, and, and you don't have to answer this, we can do it for the record. is cyber. Caesar is part of your jurisdiction and I'm very worried. We talked about the gas pipeline. Uh, the work I've done in cyber indicates to me the gas pipeline system is quite vulnerable. I can tell you almost to a certainty that China right now is trying to penetrate those SCADA systems on our on our gas pipelines. I hope this is, will be a point of emphasis for you, you'll restore whatever cuts have been made to staff at Caesar because you are on the front lines of our country being under attack. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Thank you, Senator King. Senator Brankowski.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Gentlemen, thank you for being here this morning, your willingness to serve, appreciate uh each of you. Um uh Congressman Pierce, I I appreciated our meeting uh several weeks back. It was good to to reconnect with you. Um as I mentioned in in my office uh when you're confirmed to this position you're gonna be spending a lot of time focusing on Alaska issues, not just because we're special, but because we just have more BLM land than anybody else out there. So all my friends talk about what it means in their state, very, very important. But, uh, it, it, you will find that this is a significant part of your portfolio. So we're gonna be counting on you to help us restore this, this balance that we talk about within our land management plans. We had some good news this past week, finally, with the lifting of PL uh the public land order uh fifty one fifty, fifty one eighty, so those are good but we got a lot more work to be doing uh for Assistant Secretary Haasveit. I appreciate your willingness to step into this Under Secretary role at at at DOE. Um I uh I I I'm I'm sure that you have this this this aperture, this view of of the department, but I wanna reinforce it. It really is about working to commercialize new resources and technologies, so that we're always pushing to build out uh our new supplies. I think we recognize not everything is gonna be perfect, not everything is commercially viable right now, but that's the point. That's why we have the DOE, to to help get them there. And so it doesn't help us when the administration decides that they're gonna, they're gonna say, OK, these resources are good, these are bad, they pull their permits, uh they pull their funding. So again, it's just is pushing on the innovation side. And then, uh, to you, Commissioner Lucert, you were just here last fall. Um, you know how strongly I feel about having a full complement at FERC. You guys have a tough job and you need all of you there. So, um, we're in a little bit of a different place in Alaska cuz we don't have the interstate grid but we have a whole range of FERC issues that we're gonna be asking, the FERC, to weigh in on and, and, um, hoping to be able to ask a question in that regard. Uh, let me, let me first turn to you, um, uh, Congressman Pierce, and, uh, uh, been a lot of discussion about what's going on with our public lands, but we have been, we have been fighting mightily for years now to deliver on, uh, promises made to our Alaska Native veterans at the time, um, of land selections. Those who were serving in Vietnam were not able to get Um, this is going to, this is going to require not only the opportunity for, um, expanded land availability, uh, but, but also timely processing, um, along the way. And timely processing requires people. There's so much in the BLM space that just requires you to be able to move permits, and do reviews, and when you don't have the men and women that are doing that, it makes it really, really hard to do the job. So I just, I'm gonna ask you to commit to prioritizing adequate staffing within the BLM offices. I'm looking particularly at the Alaska State offices. You know, we've we've got a big mandate under the President's day one, um, Alaska order. But you can't do that as head of BLM unless you have the folks. So, just asking for your commitment on that.
Uh, Senator, I'll be happy to - to commit to work with you, I'll be happy to come and visit personally, uh, those field offices, and to - to look specifically at the issue of - of Native American veterans. Like I said in my statement, in twenty sixteen I flew my single engine small airplane around the world, committing it to those who didn't make it back from Vietnam. I was fortunate enough to come back, but there's still a heart in - a hole in my heart for those who didn't make it. And, uh, I will pay special attention to that issue.
Thank you.
Look forward to working with you.
Thank you. I appreciate that. And, uh, I invite all of you, each of you, to, to join us in Alaska. Um, you always learn a lot when you make the trip. Um, Assistant Secretary, I, I want to ask you, um, because there are a couple offices within the Department of of Energy that we pay particular attention to. I've always felt that the Office of Indian Energy can do more. um, in terms of financing tools, leveraging to support, uh, rural and, and Alaska Native communities. Um, equally important is the Arctic Energy Office that has been elevated from the Office of Science to now sitting under the purview of, of, of S-three, which will be, be you. Um, so can you share with me real quickly your views on the Office of Indian Energy, and what do you think of the Arctic Energy Office. Do you think it's a valuable part of DOE?
Senator, thank you for the question. Absolutely, both offices are critical. We went through a realignment in November and specifically emphasized those offices. So I'm I'm proud to have the opportunity to to work with those individuals, if confirmed, uh, to to partner with Alaskans, to partner with partner with our Native Americans across the country. Uh, there's there's tremendous opportunity in your state and across the lower forty-eight as well.
Good. Look forward to working with you on that. And then, uh, Mr. Chairman, I do have one quick, uh, follow-up for - for Commissioner Lissert, and this relates to, um, uh, the Alaska natural gas pipeline proposal. Uh, FERC has already, uh, done the - the work there, but there is a great deal of conversation about the potential for a spur line to the second largest community in the state that would be Fairbanks, and, uh, and how FERC can ensure that uh that there is a potential for that uh i recognize that i'm out of time and so i'd like to have that conversation with you later uh perhaps off-line
i would love that
thank you thank you mr. chairman
thank you senator brokowski senator cortes masto
thank you mr. chairman uh to the nominees congratulation congratulations welcome welcome to all your family members here uh mr. haaseveit thank you for meeting with me in my office i appreciate the the conversation uh congressman pierce I'm probably gonna talk mostly to you. Uh, and this is why Nevada, in Nevada over eighty percent of the land is managed by the federal government, and sixty-three percent is the BLM. Um, the economic vibrancy of our state relies on a good relationship with the federal government and in really clear, um, immediate answers, um, on management decisions working with our state. Um, one of the areas I wanna talk to you about is uh in nevada years ago we we passed the southern nevada public lands management act an act and piece of legislation that secretary bergham has has praised as well this is a model um for land disposal uh like states in in in in the west uh where there's a lot of federal land and what it does is it prioritizes disposal through a process that targets parcels based on local need and utilizes conservation, for infrastructure, for recreation, for education in the state in which the land sales took place. Um, I have introduced legislation to expand that, uh, disposal boundary to the benefit of my state for economic development, for conservation, for housing, for a number of things. Um, my question to you is will you support community, community-driven legislation, like the Southern Nevada Lands Bill, that facilitates very specific disposal of land identified by local officials for housing and economic development.
Uh, Senator, uh, thanks for the question, but also thanks for the time that you spent, uh, in your office. I thought it was very instructive and, and helped me understand a state that's even more federally owned than ours. Um, but yes, I have read the comments coming from you and from the previous senator about the economic boom that is occurring on land that had very little value in the hands of the federal government. And I'm not familiar with the the expansion that you're talking about. But generally I would say that uh that I will fall very closely uh in the issue to where you stand. I just haven't looked at it and not familiar. Be happy to work with you.
Based on your experience, though, in New Mexico and in dealing with land from your private,
That's That's
it is important that locals are part of this conversation and that the federal government Pays attention to the local needs of stakeholders.
It is correct. And, and then Las Cruces,
Mm-hmm.
that we're, we're building houses on some of the most fertile Rio Grande Valley land, taking it out of farming use, when less than a half mile away there's, there's just range land that is, is currently unused by the federal government. And, again, we never got that transition done. We, we attempted it, but that was just, I think, forty acres and, and we could never get it done. So I'm Uh, I've said multiple times that I'll work with every member of the committee in their state to figure out what makes sense in their state. I don't visualize the federal government having the best insight on that.
Thank you. Um, one of the things I didn't get a chance to talk to you about when we were meeting, and, uh, the question is, it's pretty simple. We've seen this issue in the state of Nevada, but if a rancher is grazing cattle illegally on federal land, how would you handle that?
The, if they're grazing illegally? Oh, I think that the the laws will be upheld and uh we should should dig into that. Uh, and and again there are pieces of the agency which deal with that, but uh absolutely um believe that permission has to be given when when a landholder be it personal or or federal. Uh, the permission has to be sacred.
Thank you. And then let let me just touch on something Senator King talked about and I I think we talked about this as well. Um, in Nevada, Um, we currently produce forty-one percent of power through renewable resources. Most of that solar, solar industry in my state is roughly about thirty thousand jobs, um, which is more per capita than any other industry. It's about a thirteen point three billion dollars in investment. The problem we have right now is that Secretary Burgum issued a memo July fifteenth, um, in twenty twenty five that requires every single permitting, uh, decision point from wind or solar projects to be elevated and decided by him. That has essentially frozen all of our projects and stopped solar, uh, uh, i- in in the state of Nevada. Um, wouldn't you agree that the administration should be evaluating potential public land uses objectively for its highest field of resources, rather than making a determination on energy preferences?
Uh, Senator, um, uh, that's a very similar issue to, uh, what Senator King brought up and and uh I'm unfamiliar with the order and frankly have had very little discussion with the secretary up to this point on any issue um and even less with the president but I suspect that it's a conversation that that we will have I'll seek understanding and uh be working with you to get your questions specifically on that.
Thank you, and I know I'm running out of time but let me just do one final thing here. Resource management plan statewide, I have been asking the department for this, for this very reason. Because the federal government owns so much land, there has to be a partnership and a resource management plan taking into consideration our state, our local stakeholders, our tribes, and working together. Uh, I would hope that when you get in this position, you are willing to work with us on updating our resource management plan statewide for the state of Nevada. That is to the best interest of both people in the state of Nevada, but also the federal government.
I think it was Senator Heinrich that uh mentioned that we had tremendous outreach into every community in in the second district of New Mexico, and I would visualize the same same effort going into the States. Uh, so uh, you'd find me a willing partner on looking at that and working with the local communities, because that's the voice that we've got to protect. It's their economy, it's their life, it's their homes, it's their culture, it's their customs, and those are things that I'm deeply to whether Native American land or just your average, uh, c- c- mountain community or whatever, uh, yes, I would, uh, commit strongly to that.
Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Thank you. Senator Jentz.
Chairman Lee, thank you. Uh, first of all, I want to give a heartfelt thanks to each of you and your willingness to serve in these very important roles. And I truly look forward to working with each one of you, uh, once you are confirmed. Assistant Secretary Haas-Feyt, It's great to have a Butte grad here. As we say back home in Montana, it's not Butte, Montana, it's Butte, America. But a graduate of Montana Tech, it's a great institution and, um, really pleased to have a little of that DNA here at Washington. Uh, Congressman Pierce, we served together in the House of Representatives when I first came as an, as a freshman in two thousand thirteen. We served on behalf of two great Western states, uh, New Mexico and Montana. During those years that you served in the House, you sponsored a number of natural resources bills, including ones that sought to serve the interests of tribes, of ranchers, of recreationists. In fact, one of those bills was the Making Public Lands a Public Act, which directed a portion of the Land and Water Conservation Funds for increasing public access for hunting, fishing, and recreational shooting. In fact, in Montana, where we're famous for a lot of things, but the movie A River Runs Through It, where Brad Pitt suddenly disker- discovered fly fishing and ruined it for the rest of us. Um, seventy-five percent of our fishing accesses, and I've had a fly rod in my hand since I was eleven years old from my grandpa Danes, as a kid growing up in Montana. But seventy-five percent of our fishing access sites were funded by LWCF. We have accessed these amazing rivers and streams because of the Land and Water Conservation Fund. And it's been successfully used to unlock access to public lands that prior were inaccessible due to checkerboard land ownership. Under President Trump, in fact, we permanently authorized and funded LWCF in that very bipartisan Great American Outdoors Act that many said was the greatest conservation win in fifty years. My question, Congressman Pierce, if confirmed, will you continue to support expanding hunting, fishing, and recreation access on BLM lands through the LWSUF program?
Absolutely, Senator.
Congressman Pierce, we also had a great conversation about the need for forced management when you uh stopped by my office. The need for reforms as it relates to forced management. BLM manages one point three million acres of forest land in montana and the dakotas yet simple projects get bogged down in red tape and sadly endless litigation however we're making progress in helping to remedy that uh i've got a bill that will fix that ninth circuit court cottonwood decision it's passed this committee now by voice so we've got a really strong partisan support for us, and it's included in the Fix Our Forests Act. Congressman Pierce, do you agree that we need to increase the pace and the scale of forest management on BLM lands and pass reforms like the Cottonwood Fix, the Root and Stem Act, as well as the Fix Our Forests Act?
Absolutely, Senator. In in New Mexico we had uh a forest in my district that was about a million acres and they were cleaning up and uh taking out the fuels for like five hundred acres a year with a million acres, you'd never get to the end. And, and I visited with uh members of both side of the aisle about the need to go in and aggressively begin to remove the fuels if if we do that, then we're gonna increase the water supply in in the west, which is always a problem. Uh, every tree uses a certain amount of water that should be percolating down into the aquifers recharging the streams and and rivers and and stream, And so those large scale thinning projects of tens of thousands of acres instead of hundreds of acres is something that I visualize. Um, but I would also say that it's gonna take the backing of this committee to do those large projects because it's very sensitive uh on uh it's very sensitive political issue. I understand that. People say we're gonna go clear-cut. I never think we're gonna do that, but we do need to aggressively thin.
We've watched some remarkable outcomes from proper thinning in our forests. Like, you know, these trees are a bunch of straws in the ground. They're pulling water out. And you thin them out, then the trees remaining grow a lot faster. You suddenly see springs that you never knew existed are refurbished. It's - it's quite remarkable what happens to the ecosystem when we do proper forest, I mean, wildlife habitat, not to mention reducing the risk of catastrophic wildfire. And by the way, jobs for loggers in - in our sawmills as well, which is also an endangered species now. in montana i was a kid growing up we had thirty active saw mills we're down just a handful because of the loss of access in many ways to our to our natural forest
we've experienced the same thing in southern new mexico and and again the a raging fire was on the lincoln national forest up near ruidoso the uh mescalero indians have a forest that butts right up against it and that raging fire dropped down and became a grass fire because the mescaleros had cleaned theirs they had had to go through the same rules same laws And they were able to do it and so these are the things that that cause local communities to say there is hope when they see uh members of the Senate on both sides saying let's get after it and let's start cleaning up our environment.
Yeah, I'm out of time here, but it is encouraging, this is becoming increasingly a very bipartisan issue uh to uh to address this cuz fire knows no boundaries as we know.
It's very bipartisan.
Um I've got a few more questions but I'll submit those for the record. Mr. Chairman, thank you.
Great, thank you.
Thank you, Senator Daines. Uh Senator Padilla.
Uh, thank you, Mr. Chairman. Uh, thank both you and, uh, Ranking Member Heinrich for organizing this hearing. Um, Mr. Pierce, I appreciate the, uh, time we were able to spend in my office, uh, just yesterday. I'm going to echo some of the concerns and sentiments that, uh, uh, some of my colleagues have raised about public lands. Uh, and it is a bipartisan. I know Senator Rish, uh, especially was passionate earlier in the hearing today. From a California perspective, the Bureau of Land Management manages nearly fifteen percent of California's landmass. So it's critical uh for us that BLM and the BLM Director maintain these lands for future generations to enjoy and not uh just need to sell them to the highest bidder. Uh, these BLM lands in California include Chuckwala National Monument, Uh, for years, uh, I worked with numerous, uh, tribal leaders, uh, who led the effort to protect the natural resources, uh, in that area and to promote access to what is now Chuckwala. Uh, it was a thoughtfully crafted proposal, as you and I discussed in my office, that, uh, took into account, uh, the input from stakeholders, uh, conservationists of course, energy developers, utilities, tribal leaders, hunters, recreation groups, uh, and others. And we ended up with universal local support from the state and bipartisan support here in the Senate and in Congress. Uh, as a result, it was one of the outcomes of that five tribes have even formed an intertribal commission to solidify their enduring commitment to protecting sacred lands in Chukwala. My question is clear and simple,
Mm.
Mister Pierce,
yes
thank you that's a great answer short clear concise and on the record and i appreciate your support for maintaining these protections and please know that um also want to work with you uh to uh arrange a meeting with you and the members of the intertribal commission so you can learn more about chukwa don't expect you to be an expert on day one Is that a meeting that you're willing to uh commit to, should you be confirmed?
Say that again, Senator? This
The meeting with the uh the tribal commission uh that has been formed now that the d- monument designation has been finalized.
Senator, as a representative of southern New Mexico, we had uh multiple Pueblos, we had uh Apache tribes, and we had Navajos. Uh, we worked extremely closely with all of those to accomplish objectives they were looking for in their lands. uh i would visualize uh very similar uh the native americans sometimes are overlooked from washington and and uh so
not just sometimes far too often
we became a a voice for them and would continue to do that
right and we talked about uh uh meaningful substantive uh consultation not just the checking of a box it has happened so much over the course of history
absolutely
um my next question is for mister uh frirk has taken action to speed up large load trend uh interconnections to the existing grid. While load flexibility and co-location can be valuable tools for maximizing the use of our existing grid, um, they're no substitute for smart transmission investment to ensure future reliability. Tell me if you disagree. You know, I think the way I see it, to be smart, need a plan. Um, so as electricity demand continues to rise, do you believe that FERC should continue to support long-term regional transmission planning?
Absolutely. I think, um, that the far too often in the past, I think we probably could have tightened some screws with some of the, some of the plannings, uh, that have been done both regionally, inter-regionally, and at the state level themselves. I think that, uh, it's important that we squeeze every possible watt out of the existing grid that we have. Um, and that means more diligent, more proper planning, and and taking a harder look at all the decisions before us.
OK. Uh, thank you for that. I know uh uh I have less than a minute left here. Let me just uh say uh I'll be submitting a couple of additional questions for the record uh to each of you and want to register a one of those questions and concerns will be staffing cuts. You know, we're uh uh serving under administration uh whether it's through the budget process or through the doge process last year there's been funding cuts in a whole lot of places of the federal government staffing cuts in a whole lot of places of the federal government with increasing demand on the services and guidance uh that these uh departments and agencies are meant to provide how we are supposed to achieve that going forward with limited resources so look forward to ongoing conversation with you thank you
senator cassidy
thank you um Mister Haasveit. Louisiana has a big meta-AI center in northeast Louisiana, but there's one just announced with Amazon in northwest Louisiana. In both cases, both companies have committed to building the sufficient power generation so as not to raise rates. The president in the State of the Union said again we should not be raising rates and said that these data centers should. How do you ensure that? uh how do you make sure that they actually are carrying their weight if you will number one number two there's gonna be a lot of transmission line upgrade required for this and so the second part of this is how do we get that permitting through so that as they um um uh do carry their weight in terms of in terms of generation we have the transmission capability to make it happen
thank you for the question senator on the first one we have a president who is an incredible deal so he's already negotiated the deals with uh the largest hyper scalers uh the deals that he highlighted at in the state of the union last night uh focus on not only bringing their own power to provide what they need for their hyper scalers but more than enough so that we can have a downward price pressure for residential consumers uh so working with the developers is key we we need to win the ai race uh these ai data centers and power generation
Now, except that, so if it's behind the meter, then you're gonna have sufficient generation, but sometimes they're gonna have to transmit, say, electrons from the panhandle of Oklahoma, uh, to Northwest Louisiana. And that's gonna require transmission lines. Transmission has been very difficult to get done. Any thoughts on that?
Yes, Senator. I appreciate the question. It depends on where we're at. There's different solutions for different regions, but the same deal-making that the President has done for power generation, will be done for transmission as well. uh the president's committed to avoiding putting any upward pressure on rates to consumers due to data centers we wanna support the build-out without burdening
I accept that, but I'll go back to the practical nature, it's been very difficult to get large transmission lines done. Uh, I mean it can take a decade or more, I'm told. Um, uh, mister Lussert, any thoughts on that?
Yeah, absolutely, I think we could probably talk for for weeks on end about this issue, uh,
I got two minutes left.
I think First and foremost, I think we have to, we have to give flexibilities to the entities that have earned the trust and respect to have those flexibilities. We need to build procedural safeguards in place to make sure the consumers are protected. And that's why, um, my f- within my first two months on the job, uh, we committed to a P- an order within PJM which allows for new transmission the first new transmission services over the past twenty years, called firm and non-firm co-located demand. So I think it only makes sense that if we have a load that is in proximity to the generator, that's gonna reduce the amount of transmission that is required to serve that load. So, it's - it's a partnership with the States.
I get that, but if you have load which is distant from the user, then we're gonna need that transmission line, and that's been really hard to do.
It has been really hard to do, but it's been thrown out of whack many times because of the early retirement of base load power and the over-reliance on renewables. That's why we have m- uh, men- many, many areas in the country which transmit load over a large a large uh square mileage, i think that increases the cost, because you have to build that high capacity transmission from one area to another. i think it's vitally important for seams as we're going, especially in the west, in california, with an s p p. um but but co-locating load makes practical sense.
i accept that.
and uh i understand it's on it's on a uh rehearing for me so i can't get too much into the order uh but that's that's a vital step in the right direction.
then the mr. mr. haas on a different topic. The Supreme Court seems to have closed the door on that EPA tariffs. But clearly the president wants to continue to use tariffs to protect American businesses and American workers. Uh, and, and if you look, countries like China, uh, arbitrage or ignore environmental laws to lower the cost of manufacturing, as much as by twenty percent. Our manufacturers move there, we lose the jobs, but the pollution blows over on our country. Now, um, so I proposed a foreign pollution fee that would be roughly equal to the avoided cost of complying with environmental regulations to be tacked on any good which is polluting uh coming from a place like China. Any thoughts on that?
Senator, first, the the president's tariff plan has been wildly successful. We've met with countless companies who have told us
I accept that. I got a minute left. I got thirty seconds.
It They've told us that they're building here because of that. So I think the president's solving the solution by re-industrializing in the United States Uh, so I I hope that your plan is a mute point and we industrialize in the United States. We build what we need. We control it.
But it seems like those tariffs have been part of which have incentivized them to build here but now the tariffs are gone um uh again I'm promoting a congressional tool to give to the president that would stand up in court, but give business a kind of certainty as to what the tariffs would be. I'm out of time, I'll just say Steve Pearce, good to see you ma'am, uh and um uh you got my vote. Thank you.
Senator Callego.
Thank you, Chairman Lee and Ranking Member uh Heinrich, and thank you to our witnesses for being here. Thank you uh Congressman uh Pierce for uh coming by my office yesterday. Had a little hiccup with daycare and uh it was uh very accommodating considering my daughter was running around like crazy as usual. But um you know, you've you've heard it from some of our western states uh all today, and I'll give you the stat that everyone else has. You know, we have twelve point twelve point one million acres of Beeland land. Uh, we're very, very, very lucky to have such a beautiful state, the most beautiful state uh in the country. Um, and uh, within this land we have national monuments to highlight, you know, the beauty, the culture of the state too. Course, one of the ones that we we always talk about is the Grand Canyon and the ancestral footprints of such uh and so because of uh it's already been asked uh but uh but I have to do it as a as a home-stater uh because this has been somewhat uh controversial which when it comes to the Grand Canyon uh monument that has been, uh, ping-ponging back and forth, Love to make sure that, you know, there is still going to be support for that and, and would like to know if you have any plans to roll back uh protections for the Grand Canyon.
Mike.
How do you get?
Thank you, Senator, for the question, and I did enjoy the visit yesterday and uh the daycare thing uh rings heavy and, and uh is nice.
Yeah.
The uh, uh, so the monuments are, are something I uh do support deeply. And, uh, understand the Grand Canyon, it's, uh, one of the most magnificent things frankly in the world. Uh, so, uh, we'll do whatever we can to work with you any way that's necessary on that.
Right, thanks. And, uh, you know, this administration's announced initiative to build housing on federal lands with very little detail. And I think done smartly, especially as, uh, for rural Arizona, it can be, uh, uh, in a way that could be very good to help the, the costs. But after the announcement I actually asked the president, uh, and his administration, details on that cause I wanna make sure what we don't happen is that the the best lands get given away to the richest uh men and women and they end up being you know the uh estates for them and then we stop you know our communities from being able to access land that is important to fishing hunting uh camping uh because that's usually the land that is the closest to the cities but then it's also land that's most likely to be invaluable so we wanna make sure that that you know anything going forward I want it to be thoughtful I want it to make sure that it actually is actually you know, accessible to working class people. Um, so I just wanna, you know, uh, make sure once you, should you get in there, will you commit to providing the answers for these types of questions or inquiries, especially from, you know, U. S. Senators?
Absolutely, Senator, and I've mentioned a couple of times today that on those issues of use of, of, uh, public lands in your state, I really look forward to, to working with each individual senator, that each state is gonna be different. But then as far as access, and, and working class people
yeah
uh my dad was a kind of the lowest level of the oil field we had a five acre farm and uh with six kids we literally sold vegetables on the highway to to make things meat
yep
the only thing we had to do for vacation was to drive up to cloudcroft and go through that national forest that was that was our vacation and if we had little more gas we could go to black sands
that is yeah that is very true for lot of people in arizona too so you know for me it's important that that blm blm land especially the ones closest to the cities, is not sold off to, you know, potential as trophy homes to, to billionaires. So hopefully, you know, what I'm trying to communicate to you is, like, I want to make sure that doesn't happen. You'll do everything in your power to make sure that doesn't happen. Lastly, you know, as a veteran, uh, many of us use our public lands as a, basically, public therapy, if you want to call it that, right? And it's a great, great way to de-stress. It's a great way to think about what's, uh, going, uh, on in our lives. It's a lot of us will go camping together. Uh, Billingland is often the front yard for rural veteran uh communities. So how will you measure BLM's success in creat- in recreation and community benefit, not just in kind of production such as like metrics, metrics such as leases, whether it's mineral leases or or grazing leases?
The, again, I experienced the same thing you were talking about when I got back from Vietnam, backpacking in in uh California, some of the wilderness areas and the Hiva, uh exactly what you're talking about. And I think that that access is the key, and some public lands don't have very good access. My brother's in a wheelchair that President Bush put him on the uh, the Commission for Handicapped Access, uh, especially Tour Parks, I was co-chair of the National Park Subcommittee. We dealt with that issue a lot, and so access is is extremely uh, important to me, for, for everyone, and, and especially you're talking about aging populations.
Hmm.
Um, they just, they gotta be able to get there if, if we're gonna enjoy it. Right. Thank you. I'll be back.
Senator Hoven.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Um, Assistant Secretary Hausweit, um, in two thousand North Dakota produced about a hundred thousand barrels of oil a day and it was going down. We went to work, we cracked the code on the shale play. We drove it up to one point five million barrels a day. And now we're back down, now it's starting to decline down. We're at about one point one million barrels of oil a day. So we need to crack the code again, this time with enhanced oil recovery. And if we can do it by taking CO two from our coal-fired electric plants, we also double the life of those coal plants, give them a new revenue source. We passed forty-five Q, a tax credit, to help do that, and use that CO two for enhanced oil recovery. We've pulled about five point seven billion barrels out of the ground out of the uh shale now, the Bakken shale. We think we can easily double that. We're only getting about ten percent of the oil. So, uh, there's incredible potential here. If we can do it in the, uh, Bakken, then they can do it in the other show plays around the country. Tell me now, what can DOE do to make that happen, crack the code two point O?
Senator, as we've spent hours talking about this, it's something I'm passionate about. It's the top priority in our oil and gas office,
Me too.
absolutely. Uh. leaving these resources behind with only ten percent of the resource extracted is irresponsible it's not being a good steward of these resources we've been blessed with so the way that we can help uh it's multi-prong some of it's through applied research at our national lab to make sure we understand what we deploy how we deploy from the chemistry that we blend with the co two or surfactants or or rich gas uh to the metallurgy that those gases are coming in contact with And through our funding mechanisms, it's extremely important that we pilot these technologies at scale in the field as soon as we possibly can to give them the best chance of success. We need to be thoughtful in transitioning these ideas from laboratory to field development to full scale, like we did in the Bakken, commercial development. So industry takes it and scales it as we know they can.
Right. And we know we can do it technologically. The key is is getting it to commercial viability, right? And that's right in DOE's wheelhouse, isn't it? So this is an incredibly big deal. I know Secretary Wright understands it, I know Secretary Danly understands it, and I know you understand it. So that's why I'm very excited about your leadership at DOE. Now, somewhat related, but I think in an interesting way, uh, we're also looking at using a lot of that oil and gas infrastructure to see if we can't do uh, some exciting new things with geothermal. And so, talk to me about what you see as the potential also, I mean, again, we're using existing resources and we're using them in new and creative ways, better environmental stewardship and a lot more energy, and we need electricity and we need, uh, you know, uh, transportation fuels, we need all of it. So what about geothermal? What what can we do there?
So the the Williston Basin has one of the higher uh thermal gradients foreign oil and gas reservoirs, not as high as our friends out in the west where they've cooked off most of the ice carbons.
You mean places like New Mexico or Utah or those kind of places?
They're, it's a little hotter.
It's not really exciting for them, you know,
It's
just if anybody were,
But als- what we have going for us in North Dakota is geothermal is all about a delta T,
you know
a differential in temperature. And as you know, it's not always warm in North Dakota.
Not always.
So the produced fluid doesn't have to be as hot to get the same benefit in terms of the differential between the produced fluid and the ambient temperature. That's where we extract the fluid. extract the energy from the fluid and convert it to electrons.
Mm-hmm. And what, and what kind of initiatives, what are you all looking at to help do that?
The, just this morning we announced the largest ever funding opportunity for geothermal with two topic areas. One is what I talked about earlier with CO two, but now for geothermal, field pilots. We need people that drill real wells to go to the field and demonstrate these projects at scale. And the other one is to characterize. North Dakota doesn't have to do a whole lot of characterization with tens of thousands of wells you know your subsurface better than almost anywhere in the world areas in the west where there's very few vertical penetrations cause there's no existing production we need to go collect that subsurface information so we know where the highest quality resource exists
yeah and our energy and environmental research center at the university of north dakota can be very helpful with that and i would also uh think as you mentioned the national labs have a really great role to play here too so this is about american innovation and ingenuity that can create incredible new energy opportunities. Would you agree?
Absolutely, Senator.
And you're certainly committed to working on those things with the members of this committee.
Absolutely, Senator.
Yeah. Thank you.
Thank you.
Uh, uh, Mr. Lucert, thank you for your good work on FERC. I support it, I support you, and I appreciate it. You play an important role in - in your knowledgeable, thoughtful, and good about communicating with us. So I wanna thank you for that.
Thank you, Senator.
And, uh, Mr. Pierce, I - I - I don't know how somebody can bring a better background to the job than you. not to mention your incredible service to this nation in Vietnam. So if there's anything you want to put on the record, go ahead, but uh I think uh it I'm I'm just thrilled that people like you will step up and serve.
Thank you, Senator, appreciate that.
Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Senator Hovind, there will be a uh thermodynamics test for members at the end of the hearing if you wanna stick around. Senator Hickenlooper.
Thank you, Mr. Chair. Uh, thank you, all three of you, for being here. Um. Colorado is, uh, deeply invested emotionally in our public lands. It's, uh, not just the seventeen billion dollars in our outdoor recreation industry, but it's a, a sense of connection to our history, to our identity. Um, what, what it means to be a, a Coloradan. Um, now I've got a couple questions. You know, the, uh, Mister Pierce, the, and we talked a little bit on the phone about this, uh, When we, when there was talk of selling off large amounts of public lands, uh, uh, recently, um, we had over, over eighty thousand Coloradans reached out to say that they were against any large scales, uh, selling of public lands. And we know that there are existing ways that, and towns in, across the West are getting little bits of BLM land here or there for, uh, buildings. Um, but there has been huge out- uh, uh, outwelling of of people concerned about your nomination uh over many of the things that you've said around selling public lands. I know uh Senator Wyden, I watched his uh questions as well, and you said you'd follow the direction of of Congress. But I think oftentimes someone in your position influences Congress. And I guess the question is are are you free of those past comments, and there I could read back several, uh where you've supported the the widespread sale of uh, public lands either to pay down the deficit or to get money for education or, whichever reason, um, i- is that something you really can renounce and feel that if you were being asked by Congress to pr- provide input what would you say?
Uh-huh. Uh, appreciate number one the conversation, the time that you took a couple of days ago that was very instructive and I appreciate that. Uh, as far as the large scale wholesale of land, I think that the, uh, secretary has been very clear FLPM uh prohibits uh any large sale scale sale by the director. Uh, and so, uh, it would be at the secretary level, and he said, and I would intend to follow his lead on that, that there won't be any large scale sale of the lands.
Well, but if you were asked by Congress your opinion, what, I mean, what Do you still feel that would be your own personal opinion, would it be an efficient and use useful uh process to be able to sell off more of that land if Congress was asking they might change such a statute.
Well, that, uh, Senator, is, uh, kind of a multidimensional question. Uh, sometimes, um, the eastern states don't understand the role of PILT. And they begin to suggest that PILT should be taken away, that it's welfare to the west. And those conversations then take, take a whole different tack on, on the issue. Uh, so
Well, but if you were asked to sell if they were said to pay pilt to sell public lands again i don't think there'd be any question the people that are calling us and and so concerned about your nomination
yeah
that would not be a a a reason to suddenly begin selling land
that's not uh a position that i would take but also it's a position that's not even allowed by the director and uh i've indicated multiple times today that i'll work with the members of the committee on on the land and their state that uh i think that's where the best insight is gonna come on what to do with public lands
ok you know the uh one of our people calling into my office reminded me of something i had said that when this is i've said it multiple times when someone reveals himself do you believe them um and i think that there's a lot of distrust and you're gonna have to work very hard um to to dispel that i also want to ask a little a question about methane um you know the blm's methane waste prevention rule back in two thousand seventeen um uh allowed us to conserve gas and - and that otherwise would have been vented or flared made common sense but when I was governor of Colorado we actually sat down with the oil and gas industry and the environmental community and we spent a year and a half creating concise, efficient regulations that did everything possible to make sure that we did not put those harmful pollution pollutants into the air and that we were able to get maximum benefit from them uh and yet now we see that uh that the administration is trying to roll back the current rule that prevents methane waste on public lands um I think we've already proven that the energy sector can can get behind dealing with this why are we trying to you know pull that back
The uh senator I'm not familiar discussions that are going on right now i've i've had very limited contact but it would be happy to work
well let's say would you would you support high standards you know in terms of methane waste methane waste prevention would you support that kind of uh you know public operation on public land
one of one of the things that that i'm just remotely familiar with since uh getting nominated is that there's uh a very large attempt to gather methane in particular fields and use it to generate data centers in other words using that methane in a productive fashion that's something i would be very supportive of
of course but i'm talking about whirling back you know the the the existing regulations that are in place
uh again i'm not familiar with the reasons that uh the administration would be uh suggesting i'd be happy to look at it i'm happy to investigate it but uh i don't know that i could comment on it right now
ok thank you appreciate you hold back the chair
thank you very much uh senator hickenlooper um alright i wanna thank the witnesses for being here today um uh for answering our questions. Uh couple of housekeeping items. Before the end of the hearing I wanna um ask consent to enter into the record eighteen letters of support for Congressman Pierce signed by thirty different groups. They range from the Navajo Nation to the New Mexico Association of Conservation Districts. Hearing no objection, those will be admitted into the record. Questions for the record of the hearing are due by six p m tomorrow evening. That's Thursday, February the twenty sixth. The record of the hearing will remain open for statements until uh, this, uh, coming Wednesday, a week from today, Wednesday, March fourth. Um, uh, thank you to the ranking member, Heinrich, and, uh, his staff and the members of the committee. On behalf of the committee, I'm pleased to congratulate each of you on your nominations and look forward to working closely with each of you as we ap- approach, uh, at the moment where your nominations can move forward, uh, a- and proceed to the floor. I hope every senator on the committee will continue to work with me to encourage leadership On both sides of the aisle to bring these nominations to the floor as soon as possible, the committee stands adjourned.
Morning digest
Start every morning briefed on yesterday’s hearings
A free weekday email covering yesterday’s hearings and transcripts newly unlocked in the archive.



