Summary
- Sen. Lisa Murkowski said she will support Mark Cruz's nomination for Indian Health Service Director and advance it quickly toward markup.
- Mark Cruz (nominee for Director, Indian Health Service) pledged early tribal consultation, improved patient care, and modern facilities drawing on his Klamath and Rosebud teaching experience.
- Sen. Brian Schatz pressed Cruz on IHS's 15.3 percent attrition rate, arguing pay and benefits drive vacancies more than Indian hiring preference rules.
- Members of both parties agreed IHS needs sustained funding, workforce fixes, and expanded tribal self-governance while protecting trust obligations from broader department cuts.
- The committee will accept written questions until tomorrow evening before voting on Cruz's nomination to lead 15,000 employees and modernize health records and facilities.
Morning digest
Get hearings like this in your inbox
Transcript
Good morning. The committee will come to order. It's uh my pleasure this morning to be able to welcome to the committee, uh, Mister Mark Cruz, the nominee to be the Director for the Indian Health Service at the Department of Health and and Human Services. Um, we are we're graced this morning in our committee room to have a a leader uh and a colleague from the house join us, the chairman of the Appropriations Committee, the Honorable Tom Cole and and and uh Chairman, I know that you have a very busy morning over there. Uh ordinarily the the uh Vice Chair and I would give our opening comments, but I think I would like to defer to you this morning as a as a courtesy for time, um for your introduction for for Mister Cruz if you would like.
Well, thank you very much Madam Chair. That's incredibly gracious and I'm
We're gracious on this.
very it is very gracious of you. And uh very, very um uh pleased to accept that generous offer and I'll deliver my remarks. If it's okay with your permission, then I'll exit the room so I can get to my mark-up. But thank you again.
We respect that, yeah.
Thanks for your consideration. Mister Vice-Chair, it's good to see you again as well. Um, good morning to everyone. I'm very proud to be here to introduce my friend Mark Cruz, who's been nominated to serve as the Director of the Indian Health Service. But first, I want to extend my thanks to President Trump and Secretary Kennedy, for this nomination and for instilling such a focus on tribal health issues. Uh, Mark's nomination reflects the administration's continued commitment to strengthening the federal government's relationship with our tribal nations and ensuring that native communities have strong leadership at the helm of their primary health institution. On top of that, I want to recognize the broader work that Secretary Kennedy's department has undertaken to strengthen the IHS and improve outcomes across Indian country. Uh, HHS has made real progress on investments and expanding access to care. Not to mention just last week they convened the first White House Council on American Indian Affairs meeting. This work matters, and today's nomination of Mark Cruz continues that momentum. On a personal note, I've known Mark for many, many years, uh, and it's been amazing to watch his professional journey and his unwavering commitment to serving tribes across this nation. Mark and I first met in the summer of two thousand eleven during one of my Codells to South Dakota which focused on tribal relations. Mark was teaching at a high school on the Rosebud Indian reservation at that time. Even at our first meeting, Mark immediately stood out to me, not just for his knowledge and work ethic, but also for his genuine respect and care for tribal communities. Later that year, on December two thousand eleven, we reconnected at the White House Council on Native American Affairs Tribal Leader Summit at the Department of the Interior. Following that meeting, Mark joined my office as a legislative fellow, focusing on tribal policy and funding issues. During his time on my staff and throughout his congressional career, we had the opportunity to work closely together on a number of different Native American issues. Among them were the passing of the Tribal Labor Sovereignty Act in the House, and improvements uh to tribal educa- the tribal education system. Our advancements on these issues gave me the a front row seat to mark steadfast leadership and dedication he listens he's talented at relationship building, he asks questions, he is knowledgeable, and most important of all, he never lost sight of who the work was for, our tribal communities. Those experiences, along with many others throughout the years, gave me confidence early on that Mark was a leader. Since then, I've watched him continue to grow as a public servant. And throughout all that growth, he's maintained respect for tribal sovereignty and a clear understanding of the federal trust's responsibility. The director of Indian Health Service is an important job. It requires someone who can lead and navigate challenges, while at the same time keep Native Americans at the center of every decision. At a time when improving tribal health outcomes in Indian countries remains both an urgent challenge and a shared responsibility, I know Mark will rise to that challenge. So today, if you take uh one thing out of my remarks, let it be this. I support Mark's nomination and I can confidently say there is no one better suited for this role. He's a leader, he builds bridges, and he works across the aisle. He knows that Native American issues and are genuinely bipartisan and in most ways nonpartisan. You either believe in tribal sovereignty or you do not. And you either understand the trust responsibility of the United States or you do not. Mark understands both. As a member of the Chickasaw Nation, I know firsthand how important it is to have tribal representation here in Washington, D. C. And it's an honor and a privilege to be one of those strong voices for our tribal nations myself. I know Mark is also up to this task as a member of the uh Klamath tribes himself. His upbringing and experience will give him an insight into this role that very few have. If he is confirmed as the head of the IHS, Indian country will be in good hands. I'm so proud of Mark for how far he has come since those days when I first met and began to wor- and uh we began to work together and I'm grateful for his dedication to tribes public service. I have every confidence that Mark will be successful in this role as IHS Director, and that under his leadership, the Indian Health Service will continue advancing its missions and improving health outcomes for tribal nations and Native Americans across the country. I encourage you to move forward with this swift confirmation of Mark Cruz. He will never let you or Indian country down. Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you, uh, Chairman Cole. Thank you. I'm sure that, uh, uh, Mr. Cruz appreciates those words, very kind. Um, I want to show my appreciation and just extend my thanks, uh, for all of the work that you have done for Indian country. Your leadership in the house over the decades in this area has been, um, extraordinary. And as the Chairman of the Interior Appropriations Committee, where we work on these budgets, uh, I know that Indian country and, uh, Native people across America have, uh, a good strong leader and support over there. So we appreciate your words on behalf of this nominee and - and again your good work over on the House side.
That's very kind of you, Madam Chair. Thank you very much. And I won't leave till I'm excused. I know whose house I'm in.
You may be excused and, uh,
Thank you very much, Madam Chair.
any time. Thank you.
Mister Vice-Chair, thank you and thank you.
Good luck over there this morning.
Thank you.
Thank you so much.
Very much appreciated. Good luck.
Well, we shall start our our hearing then. Uh, again, we're considering the nomination of Mark Cruz to serve as the Director of Indian Health Service at the Department of Health and Human Services. President Trump nominated Mister Cruz for this position on June first of twenty twenty six. Uh, Mister Cruz, it's great to be able to welcome you to the committee and and I offer my congratulations on your nomination and my thanks for your willingness to step into this position I appreciated the opportunity that we had yesterday for the discussion um you made a couple points yesterday that I felt were um really compelling and are are worth repeating here today because I think that they demonstrate a very clear understanding of the role that you have been nominated for and and the responsibilities. First you said tribal consultation is a process, not an event. Think about that, how important it is because so much of the time around here tribal consultation is just kind of a check the box exercise. We meet for one meeting and boom, we move on to something else. But you say tribal consultation is a process and I could not agree more. Meaningful uh consultation requires ongoing engagement, trust and accountability, and you're certainly going to be doing a lot of it as director if you are confirmed. Uh, you also noted that HHS is a federal department that touches the lives of Native people from birth to death. And this observation reflects both the scope of the department's responsibilities, but also the importance of just getting it right.
Mm-hmm.
You've got a full spectrum here. The director of IHS is the most senior senate confirmed official at HHS, charged with carrying out the federal trust responsibility and advancing the agency's mission of improving health outcomes and addressing long-standing disparities that face uh American Indians and Alaska Natives and if confirmed, you will oversee health care services delivered through federal federally operated facilities, support tribal health programs operating under self-determination and self-governance authorities, and work with urban Indian organizations provide critical services to Native people living in urban communities. You'll also be called upon to understand the unique challenges facing Native communities and to help develop practical solutions that improve access to care and health outcomes. And while you do not come from the career ranks of IHS, your experience gives you a strong foundation for this position. Your lived experience in Native communities, your service as First Tribal Senior Advisor to Sen- Secretary Kennedy and your previous work at the Department of Interior as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs have provided you with valuable perspective and experience. I also recognize your role in advancing uh the President's FY twenty-seven budget proposal for IHS uh which includes an eleven percent increase in funding uh continued advanced appropriations and full funding for contract support costs and uh, one O five L lease obligations. You noted that the budget submission reflected partnership and consultation with tribes. I think this is really important for every agency that fulfills the Federal Trust's responsibility. The committee has received more than forty letters from tribes and tribal organizations that support your nomination and those letters will be included in the hearing record I've also heard myself from tribal leaders in Alaska, who have spoken highly of your understanding of the unique legal and policy framework that governs native health care and tribal programs. So, Mister Cruz, I - I - I don't usually say it before we've actually gone through the hearing process but I am looking forward to supporting your nomination and - and working with the Vice Chairman and our colleagues uh to move your nomination through the committee. IHS needs a confirmed director. You know there's a lot of work ahead of you. Uh, we continue to face significant challenges, including workforce shortages, behavioral needs, aging health facilities, and ensuring that tribal self-determination remains at the center of federal Indian health policy. And these are, these are issues that, that not only require, um, sustained attention, but real partnership throughout it all. So, looking forward to hearing more from you this morning about your vision for IHS and your priorities. Um, I anticipate that members will have additional questions for the record and I will look forward to your responses to those as well. So again, thank you for being here. Congratulations on the nomination. And I will now turn to the Vice Chair, uh, Senator Schatz, for his comments.
Thank you, Chair Murkowski, and thank you to the nominee and his family for being here. If confirmed as the director of IHS, Mister Cruz will manage a multi-billion dollar budget and approximately fifteen thousand federal employees. He will also be the most senior Senate confirmed executive charged with carrying out the agency's mission and will be expected by statute and tradition to fulfill the federal government's trust and treaty obligations to provide health services to American Indians and Alaska Natives and improve their health outcomes. At a time when IHS faces persistent workforce shortages, aging infrastructure and ongoing concerns about service delivery, this committee has a responsibility to carefully examine whether any nominee is prepared to meet the demands of this position from day one. This responsibility takes on added significance as tribal nations navigate proposed changes across the federal government including actions that may affect the delivery of trust and treaty obligations that are often happening without meaningful tribal consultation. So in today's hearing I look forward to hearing how Mister Cruz, if confirmed, plans to strengthen the quality and access to health care services for American Indians and Alaska Natives, improves operations and addresses challenges facing IHS, especially the workforce shortage. These duties are critical no matter which party is in the White House, and so today's hearing is an opportunity for Mr. Cruz to demonstrate his commitment to serving native communities and his readiness to provide leadership, expertise, and the advocacy necessary to uphold the federal trust responsibility. I thank the chair for convening this hearing and I look forward to hearing from Mr. Cruz.
Thank you, Vice Chair. Uh, Mister Cruz, the the rules of our committee require that, uh, all nominees be sworn in connection to their testimony, so we will now swear you in before you testify. I would ask you to to rise and raise your your right hand. Do you solemnly swear that the testimony you are about to give to the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs shall be the truth the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
I do.
You may be seated. Now before you begin your statement, I will ask you three questions that I uh address to each nominee that comes before this committee. First, will you be available to appear before this committee and other congressional committees to represent departmental positions and respond to issues of concern to the Congress?
Yes, Chair.
Are you aware of any personal holdings, investments or interests that could constitute a conflict or create an appearance of such a conflict, should you be confirmed and assumed the office to which you have been nominated by the president.
No, chair.
Are you involved or do you have any assets held in blind trust?
No.
Very good. So, Mister Cruz, um, again, we're pleased that you are before the committee here today. Uh, I would ask you to proceed with your testimony. We do have, uh, your full written testimony, uh, that each of the members have. Um, so however you would like to, uh, uh, truncate that, uh, or expand on that, we appreciate it.
Absolutely.
And if you have any friends or family that you would like to have recognized, we also, uh, welcome that as well. So you may begin.
Great. Great. Uh, while Kleecy, Chair Murkowski, Vice Chair Schatz, and distinguished members of the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, I'm Mark Cruz. I'm deeply honored, as are my family, the Klamath tribes and my fellow Oregonians, that President Trump has nominated me to serve as the twelfth director of the Indian Health Service. My life has been profoundly shaped by people who took a chance on me. Growing up in a rural community, I am forever grateful to the families who opened their homes, gave me rides to games, or made sure I had a meal. In that same spirit, I'd like to make a few acknowledgements. First, I want to thank Chairman Tom Cole for his generous introduction. He gave me an opportunity right out of grad school. and has been a constant source of advice, counsel, and support throughout my career. Second, I wanna thank my brother Cougar for being here today, and recognize my sister Shawnee, who couldn't join us. I also honor my late brothers Cody and Victor, um who remain in my heart. Um, I wanna give a heartfelt thank you to the many friends that I have here in the room. Many from my hometown of Klamath Falls, Oregon. Um, and my tribal delegation, Chairman Ray. Angie Wilson, who runs our health, and Councilman Jackson. And my best friends, Kyle and Blake. Also wanna recognize the BIA director who's joined us here today, a good fellow friend in Oregonian. And I wanna thank the people who have sent prayers both traditionally and by text message, they both count. I appear before you today humbled and grateful. Ready to share my story and my vision for the Indian Health Service. As a proud citizen of the Klamath tribes, a first generation college student, and a former foster child. As a, as is far too often, I come from a broken home. I'm the son of a deported drug dealer and a lifelong addict. I'm also the grandson of Barbara Unive, who after overcoming colon cancer at the Santa Fe Indian Hospital, and leaving a comfortable life in Dixon, New Mexico, she returned to Klamath to raise me and my siblings. Her love and sacrifice made everything that followed possible. In some places it takes a village to raise a child, in Indian country it often takes an auntie or a grandmother. For more than a year, I have served as senior advisor to HHS secretary Robert F. Kennedy, junior. I thank the secretary for creating position in response to tribal leaders' requests and for entrusting me with that role. I work closely with department colleagues, tribes, and advisory committees to address the variety of issues that come before the department. That also means going to your state, such as Alaska and New Mexico and Oklahoma and North and South Dakota, amongst others, where I coordinate and collaborate with other federal agency leaders to address issues brought forth by tribal communities and promote health care affordability and improve nutrition in Indian country. If confirmed, I am committed to continued rigorous engagement and follow-up. Life in Indian country can be extraordinarily difficult. As a former high school teacher on the Rosebud reservation, I saw firsthand the devastating effects of suicide, substance abuse, missing and murdered Indigenous people, gangs, economic hardship, and chronic disease. While these challenges persist, I have also witnessed the extraordinary dedication of health care providers, teachers, and law enforcement officers, both Native and non-native, who walk into our communities every day and work tirelessly to empower the next generation. Last summer, I visited the Rosebud Hospital. While I saw the real challenges with workforce, facilities, Management. My spirit was lifted when I heard someone call out, " Mister Cruz." It was one of my former students from St. Francis, who is now working the front desk, twelve years later. In that moment, I was powerfully reminded why I'm called into this work. Committee members, I firmly believe that tribal consultation is a process, not an event. Tribal leaders in Congress can count on me to engage early, listen carefully, and be transparent. I am realistic about the challenges, but optimistic about what we can achieve together. With strong federal, tribal, and urban Indian health partners, outcomes will continue to improve. We see this in the work to return traditional first foods, the secretary's work to address the chronic disease epidemic, work in the special diabetes program, amongst many others. If current confirmed as director, what I will bring is direct lived experience and the communities and systems I would oversee, my family, my friends, and my tribal community will live with the consequences of that work I do for decades to come. I would welcome that challenge and I'd be honored by the opportunity. Thank you for the consideration of my nomination. Sabkatsha.
Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Cruz. Um, we will now begin a r- a round of questions. Um, I am going to ask consent to include in the hearing record the letters of support that we have received from Mister Cruz's nomination uh so they will be included um let me ask first about the dual role um that you will be um uh taking on you're gonna continue to serve as Secretary Kennedy's Senior Advisor for Indian Health while also leading IHS obviously both roles are are critically important Um, IHS is central to fulfilling the federal government's trust responsibility to provide the the health care to American Indians and Alaska Native, but many issues that impact, uh, tribal communities extend well beyond IHS and across HHS. We were talking about them just yesterday. It's everything from from Head Start, it's LIHEAP, that's some of the domestic violence, um, programs, uh, child welfare, homelessness. There's so many other areas. Um, Now, HHS is, um, um, I was gonna say undergoing, but they are, um, uh, they have announced a pretty major reorganization. Uh, we held an oversight hearing here in the committee to ensure the federal trust responsibility and the tribal programs were protected throughout any restructuring um but one of the things that we heard very clearly at that hearing was that tribes need strong advocates. within the department who understand how decisions across HHS impact our native communities. So, can you just speak to, uh, first of all, this dual-hatted, uh, responsibility that you - you have, but also, um, how you will elevate tribal issues across the entire department, and as there are discussions about organizational changes within HHH, it's HHS itself, how we ensure that not only it's meaningful tribal consultation, but protecting these programs that serve uh native communities. So often it doesn't the the programs themselves don't have uh tribal in the title, but again the impact to um to our native families is quite considerable. Can you speak to these issues? Thank you.
Yeah, thank you, chair. Uh, first to um th- your question about the dual role. Um, the secretary created this senior advisor position, and I'm the first such to do this job. And so we're still figuring out a lot. But as you mentioned, there's a lot of work in of tribal affairs in the different operating divisions. Uh, a piece of my work in that role has also been to work closely with uh the Indian Health Service. Thankfully we have a couple of political appointees there. Um you know one of my hiring philosophies is to hire people smarter than myself, so we have Doctor Hartwig, uh a experienced family provider, and Clayton Fulton, a lawyer, uh who are helping within Indian Health Service. If confirmed, I would look forward to closely working with them um and taking on some more of those management responsibilities. that the IHS director is responsible for. But what's surprising to me is that it's taken so long for that senior advisor position to be uh created. But it's also surprising to hear that the IHS director hadn't had a meaningful role with the secretary prior to this senior advisor role being created. So in a way, if confirmed, I would have I would be dual hatting, but I would essentially be uh preserving that close relationship with the secretary. And as we manage within the department, that is just a critical relationship to have because we do hear about a number of issues from tribal leaders and tribal health departments and our urban partners about issues that are occurring in different operating divisions. And in my current capacity, I get to troubleshoot that. um in a future capacity as director um again if confirmed, uh I would continue to do those things and advocate even more ferociously for the equities of our tribal partners and our urban Indian partners, so I see them as very complimentary. Um the IHS director is an important advocate for Indian country within the department, and I think that both are achievable and they're not mutually exclusive. And the final point is, I also hear all the time about the silos that HHS has artificially created. We get it in QFRs, we've seen it in GAO reports. The beauty of this role would be to be able to navigate between OpDiv and OpDiv and be a part of budget formulation conversations in ACF, in other operating divisions. And so I look at this as a a positive and a win for Indian country.
Well It is a challenge and it's one that I hope every morning you wake up and you think, how am I going to reinforce the tribal provi uh priorities at all these levels within a massive department where most of the people around you are not focused
Mm-hmm.
on the needs of Indian country.
Yep.
And so for you to be that advocate within the department and continuing this role as senior advisor, I do think is important. I think it's pretty telling, um, uh, that you note that there has been, um, somewhat of a disconnect, I'll just phrase it that way, between the IHS director and, um, and the department itself and, and the secretary's office. And maybe that's why we have, we have struggled, um, uh, sometimes over the years with a,
Mm.
um, just a lack of of connectivity there. So we're putting a lot on your shoulders here. Um, but, uh, uh, making sure that you are first and foremost thinking about, uh, tribal, um, tribal interests and, uh, the interests of Native Americans, Alaska Natives and Native Hawaiians every day is is where we want you to focus.
Absolutely. Absolutely.
Vice Chairman.
Thank you, uh, Mister Cruz, um, thank you for being willing to serve and thank you for the conversation yesterday. We we talked a little bit about the IHS uh s staffing problems and under
Mm-hmm.
the current administration, IHS's attrition rate re reached a four year high, fifteen point three percent in twenty twenty five. Um, you know what this does to service delivery. Um. We talked yesterday about housing, about pay scale, about Indian preference in hiring. Um. But in the in the written correspondence, you you tended to focus a little bit more on Indian preference in hiring than the other things. And I told you I was open to modifications if they were a real impediment. I just don't want them to be the scapegoat. It seems to me that if you're being asked to hire to to look first at a tribal member,
Yeah.
that's sort of intuitive anyway, because it's hard to keep people in these jobs in health care. And to the extent that they belong to those communities, they tend to stick around. And so it's just a smarter investment. But nobody's prohibited from hiring someone who is not a tribal member. Um. And so I I just wanted to put a fine point on what do you actually think the problem is with the IHS staffing shortfalls.
Yeah. Uh, thank you, Vice Chairman. Um, as I noted, this has been a long persistent challenge of the Indian Health Service. And in my current capacity as Senior Advisor, I've worked with the Indian Health Service team to understand why for decades we've heard of this vacancy rate fluctuate. And we can and, you know, GAOs look uh, you know, independent observers have looked at this. And as we noted, it's a number of factors, um, housing opportunities, education opportunities, a variety of factors. But when I really push back, like those are well documented again for a l for a while. But then I see my six thirty eight tribal partners who also have a duty to hire and provide direct services. Why are th th why is their vacancy not thirty percent? So that's where I wanna look to uh their expertise, their experience, and then ultimately their flexibilities that IHS i isn't subject to. So. The more we can bring authorities and flexibilities to IHS to and this long time vacancy rate, the better. And if it's a matter of our hiring managers, um, you know, being overly cautious, like, I wanna understand why and where that comes from.
Yeah, the other thing is under six thirty eight you can you can do different things, right? You the pay scale's different.
Yeah. Yep.
That's probably the main thing, like intuitively if you're trying to fill a job, the more you pay, the more applicants you're gonna get.
Absolutely.
And so the six thirty eight That authority is to me probably the dispositive one. Um, they can hire J one visas and they can provide additional benefits. And so, um, the reason I care so much about this is frankly twofold. One is like this is the problem, right? You can't run any healthcare delivery service with a fifteen percent attrition rate. And so it's extremely important that we actually identify the rate limiting factors and not the potential scapegoats.
Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm.
And one of the things this committee has been very good about doing is sort of whatever disagreements Democrats and Republicans have, or may have had in the past, or continue to have regarding DEI and all of that, we sort of hold harmless what we're up to because of trust in treaty obligations. And so I was a little worried that it was like it's preferences and hiring, and then we're down a road where there's a whole sort of swarm of internet trolls on both sides of this equation, and we're not like figuring out what's the damn problem.
Yep.
Seems to me, if you're talking about flexibilities, it's not necessarily that six thirty eight has unique flexibilities on hiring preferences, but just they can pay more, provide more benefits, and hire different people. And so I just want your commitment to attack this problem, um, as if I didn't know which political party you belonged to, cuz I, that's my expectation for you as IHS director.
Thank you, Vice Chair. Uh. you have my commitment to work with you on it, like a long-standing problem that I wanna get after, and I wanna just be honest about the situation. And at the end of the day, my priority, if confirmed as director, is patient care. I'm tired of visiting facilities where they've had double-digit vacancy rates and I really wanna work closely with my team. I've been a fierce advocate internally for hiring exemptions and put together a robust twenty twenty six hiring plan, so This is gonna take time. We didn't arrive here in eighteen months, and it's gonna take a a a concerted group collaborative effort to get out of it. So I look forward to working with you and your team.
Thank you.
One final question. Do do we have your commitment to be responsive personally if any member of the Indian Affairs Committee has any question will you call them back within a reasonable time frame?
Yes, Vice Chairman.
Thank you.
Thank you. Senator Smith.
Uh, thank you, Chair and Vice-Chair, and welcome to the committee, Mister Cruz, and thank you for our conversation last week. It was very helpful to me. Um, so here's what I'm wrestling with. You clearly have an understanding, a firm understanding of the federal government's, uh, trust and treaty obligations to tribal nations and to Native people. And you have the support of tribal leaders in Minnesota, which is, of course, very important to me. Um, yet you also have served as senior advisor to senator, to uh, secretary Kennedy during a time of great tumult in the department. Um, this administration has gutted public health, health research, mental health programs, um, which in my view has caused real harm to Native communities, um, even if IHS was spared. And as you have said, um, the Department of Health and Human Services touches all aspects of life for Native people, not just, it's not just the IHS. So I'm trying to reconcile this, and I wanna ask a couple of questions to try to get at this. Um, the first question has to do with, um, the, um, eleven fifteen Medicaid waivers, okay.
Mm-hmm.
So we know the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recently published guidance implementing a provision of the one big beautiful bill that makes it harder for states to offer services like traditional healing and Medicaid programs but essentially states are now being required to resubmit existing eleven fifteen waivers. um, and prove that a service is budget neutral. And, um, you've touted the use of these waivers to expand access to traditional healing. So can you talk about this? How would this new budget neutrality requirement, you know, have an impact or how might it impede access to services like traditional healing?
Mm-hmm. Uh, thank you for that, uh, question, Senator, and I really appreciated our conversation and the heartfelt nature of it. Um, specific to your question, around the section eleven fifteens. So I am generally aware I don't work at CMS directly. Um, I wasn't involved in that role making. However, um, I have seen, uh, correspondence from tribal organizations that have, um, provided their views and feedback on, um, th these regs. Uh, some of it's been positive, some of it has asked for additional, um, work. Um, I will work closely with the DTA team, um, to understand what that budget neutrality actually does for the traditional healing, but the secretary and I have been supportive of those methods.
Okay.
You know, it's kind of a all hands on deck. Um, what we what we know is what works for one person may not work for another. So that's why we've been supportive.
Right. Well, we can follow up on that and and and further that conversation.
Um, yeah, so would love to follow up.
I think it's an example of why it's so important that these,
Mm-hmm.
you know, the these sort of broad-based changes in Medicaid that have a big impact on Native communities, that that is that is well thought through.
Mm-hmm.
Let me follow up just a just a little bit more clarity on the question that, um, Senator Murkowski was asking about dual roles. So will you which office will you work out of? Will you work out of IHS or will you stay in the secretary's office? Like, how will that work?
So, thank you, Senator. A lot of the, uh, those logistics were still working out if confirmed, right? It's predicated on a positive vote.
Uh-huh.
Um, so I, if confirmed, I will be showing up in Rockville. That's the duty station of the Indian Health Service director. Um, I've also know that I will keep an office near the secretary, where I currently uh, the one I currently occupy.
So you would imagine going back and forth a bit?
And Yeah, absolutely.
Uh-huh.
And a lot of our leaders do. Um, I see our HRSA administrator.
Uh-huh.
I see our CMS administrator and we have our all politicals meetings. Uh, oftentimes senior leadership from different op divs are staffing the secretary in meetings or briefing him.
Okay.
And so having that public board presence is important.
Well, and w- I'm sorry, uh, so you would continue. And and then will you be paid out of IHS or out of the secretary's office? Is that figured out yet?
Uh, uh, I haven't we haven't figured that out, but my understanding is if I encumber the IHS position, um,
That would be better.
I would have to be paid out of IHS,
Okay, okay.
yeah.
Um. Um, s- um, Senator Shatz was, um, getting at that a little bit, but I'm getting at this next question a little bit. It has to do with big big hullabaloo at the beginning of the Trump administration about how there was a sort of a blanket um all DEI initiatives are, are bad and need to be thrown out, this happened everywhere, and it was really, um, in my view, very unfortunate how, um, Native people got caught up in that as if providing particular attention to Native people was part of some broader DEI initiative. Can you just commit that in this role that you will um ensure that programs that are
Mm-hmm.
serving tribes in the Native Hawaiian community are not considered DEI or sort of cut because of the misconstrued connection between DEI and those tribes and those programs?
Yeah, yeah, I'm aware of the DOJ clarification last spring and I will support the trust and treaty responsibility that the federal government has for tribal partners.
Okay, and just one last quick question. Will you support advanced appropriations for IHS and strong funding in upcoming budgets?
I support the president's budget request that does include advanced appropriations.
Okay. I have a follow-up question on urban um indigenous communities, but I'll submit that to the record. Thank you very much.
That's great.
Thank you, Senator.
Thank you, Senator Smith.
Thank you.
Senator Lujan.
Good morning, sir.
Thank you for taking time to come by the office. Very much appreciated the conversation.
Yes.
Um, as as you've heard from all of my colleagues, I I share with Democrats and Republicans here how important IHS is to our constituents,
Mm-hmm.
um, to the people that have entrusted us with these responsibilities. Um, in New Mexico you're familiar. You've you've visited recently, um, to the nation, uh, to the Navajo Nation as well as a few other, um, sovereign nations as well.
Yes, Senator.
As you know, IHS serves as a backbone of healthcare for communities. And and I remain concerned any time I get a call from a constituent or see someone at their home or if they stop by and visit me cuz they see me out on the farm doing something and tell me what happened, and it's not a good story. Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. Um. Nowhere is this more evident than at the Gallup Indian Medical Center, which we sp- spoke about in my office. Yes, sir. One of the largest Native serving medical facilities in the entire country. Now, GMI, GIMC contends with persistent drinking water issues, as you're aware. Uh, people from IHS have visited over there, um, as a matter of fact when I brought up in a hearing here that the drinking, that there were signs around the hospital that people shouldn't drink water.
Hmm.
Someone from Washington DC ordered them to take the signs down.
Hmm.
Not fix the water problem. Take the signs down.
Hmm.
That's not leadership. That probably put some of my constituents in harm's way.
Mm-hmm.
Now, I hope that the United States knows that we cannot allow a facility of this importance to keep operating under these conditions. Getting a new facility built is not optional, it's imperative. As I've shared with you, this facility was left out of the FY twenty seven budget, because it was deemed not quote " shovel ready".
Hmm.
So my question is In this new role, will you commit to working with the Navajo Nation to ensure that the project is shovel-ready so that it will be included and it is ready in time for the next budget cycle?
Senator, thank you. Um, I really enjoyed our conversation and specifically about my visits to your state. Um, when I walked in in my current capacity as senior advisor, one of the areas I wanted to look at was our construction program. because there's no more direct signal of one's commitment to health than a modern clean safe facility. And when I saw that IHS had eight projects on their nineteen ninety-three list, my jaw dropped. And unfortunately, Gallup Indian Medical Center is one of those projects on that list. And I asked the basic question, why has it taken thirty-three years to clear this list? And what is the plan of action? And so, um, what I can share is I wanna make sure that those remaining projects get on a a a a path towards completion so whether it's environmental review, permitting, I wanna understand that, if it's design, build, I wanna understand that, and then uh I'm also actively monitoring where uh projects such as the one in White Mountain Apache are So from being on the list through ribbon cutting, I wanna know where each of those are. And then I also wanna know where the resources are gonna come from to finish those projects. I have fundamental issues with the way the federal government um completes Indian schools, Indian justice centers, Indian hospitals and clinics. We pay with cash up front. It's just not a very efficient use of a big capital with big facilities. And I think that's been part of the challenge we've seen over thirty-three years and why it's taken us this long to get where we are. So yes, I am firmly committed to putting those projects on a glide path out. It's gonna require resources. There's no there's no bones about it. The latest estimate I received to get those eight projects done was eight billion dollars. My annual appropriation in that line item is just under two hundred million. Doing quick math, it's gonna take us about forty years to get those eight projects done. That's unacceptable.
So is this a flaw in the budget? Did the budget leave these projects out? And is that something you'll advocate to correct and get the a- and and ask for eight billion dollars in the president's budget cuz the president's budget, didn't ask for eight billion dollars.
So, Senator, um, what we did was within the authorities that we have at HHS, we created a one billion dollar neff commitment. So that was a strong step by the secretary to recognize and acknowledge And then I look forward to working with my colleagues at OMB too.
But, Mi- Mister Cruz, I, uh, sorry to interrupt,
Yeah.
there's my time's running out here. If the problem's eight billion dollars, if that's the need, then the request is eight billion dollars.
I look forward to w- working with you, Katie.
It's not one billion so we can say we're gonna do better. That that's failing. And I'll blame every other president, every other administration that came before the thirty-three years.
Mm.
They didn't fix it either.
Mm-hmm.
I'm here now, you're here now, President Trump is here now.
Yeah.
Pres- uh, Secretary Kennedy is here now. Are we gonna fix it or are we gonna come back in here and say, " Well, We put another hundred million dollars, we're not making anything better. And so I I hope we can get there.
Yeah.
The last question I have here, sir, well, for I also wanna thank you, I I raised an issue with you and your team
Yes.
about um a position that was taken by HHS and IHS with the sanitary um entity about uh uh uh uh what I would call a bad decision, an arbitrary decision about treatment of GRT to Santo Domingo Pueblo.
Yes, sir.
After we met, I was informed that Santo Domingo Pueblo got a letter or a communication that said that that notification, that internal guidance memo was rescinded. Is that true?
Yes, Senator, very smart.
I I want to say thank you for that. And to all my colleagues, just as we fix tax issues. I certainly hope that we can do a policy change here so that this confusion is not created at any one of these facilities again to um misspeak uh over tax treatment to sovereign nations as well and Mister Cruz, I won't ask you this uh in the hearing, I'd ask for you to respond uh in in in writing, but is there any action that's been taken by Secretary Kennedy while he's been secretary of IHS or HHS and IHS under him that you disagree with? And I have a list of terminations, problems across the country. I'm really interested here because this will help us understand the priorities that we can expect to be addressed um and Madam Chair, as I turn the turn turn the my time back to you and as as it expired, I also wanna say that maybe Mister Cruz should have been nominated as Assistant Secretary of Indian Affairs. And the reason I say that when Senator Smith asked him a question about making a commitment to consultation with tribes, Mister Cruz didn't hesitate. He said yes. I'm still waiting for the Assistant Secretary of Indian Affairs to say that he will commit to consultation with tribes, and I just don't know why that's hard. So I want to commend you for your response today as something that we should all take seriously with consultation. Uh, for that. Thank you for the time, Madam Chair.
Thank you, Senator Lujan. Senator Cortes-Masto.
Thank you, Mr. Cruz. Thank you. Uh, a- along with my colleagues, I so appreciate you meeting with me and taking the time. Um, congratulations on your nomination.
Thank you.
Let let's talk about the dual role, one thing we didn't talk about. I think there is an opportunity. Um. with this dual role that you have. I'm conflicted as well because I think there's gonna be times when the secretary um is going to be issuing issuing some sort of edict which may conflict with Indian country and you're gonna have to make a decision.
Mm-hmm.
But there's also an opportunity here, and I I wanna put this in front of you. Senator Rounds and I introduced a piece of legislation that's called um the Stronger Engagement for Indian Health Needs Act. And what it actually does is it elevates the IHS director position to assistant secretary. Why? Because right now, in addition to the workforce recruitment and retention challenges, uh, IHS leadership can't directly hire or fire their own employees. You don't have a lot of authority to do anything.
Mm-hmm.
And by elevating it to assistant director, I'm hoping it addresses a lot of the challenges we're facing right now. So you have a great opportunity in your senior advisor role,
Mm-hmm.
along with what you're doing now as the director of IHS, to see if that should be elevated. This there's legislation out there. ask that you would consider that and take a look at the legislation uh and let us know and report back to us if that if that makes sense. Would you be willing to do that?
Absolutely, Senator, and uh really enjoyed our conversation and the needs of the Nevada tribes. Uh, Angie's in the room here with me, so um really glad that uh I have her counsel on speed dial.
As are.
And yeah, absolutely happy to look at that. Um, if confirmed as director, I wanna understand my full hiring and firing authorities, and if there's legislation out there that would potentially give any IHS director those authorities um happy to review that and work with you and your team.
Thank you. Um uh I I wanna talk a little bit about the staffing that that you and I had talked about uh as well. Um uh my understanding IHS already faces a thirty percent staff vacancy rate and chronic underfunding as we have talked about. Um because of this uh, and this is something that's consistent and I'm gonna, um, agree with my colleague, uh, Benrey Lujan, uh, it's consistent under any administration right now, and this is our frustration.
Yeah.
Um, and so because of that, Mark Wayne Mullen, when he was here, um, we introduced a piece of legislation called the IHS workforce parity act. And that's to strengthen recruitment and retention by providing greater flexibility uh for providers in IHS.
Mm-hmm.
So I would hope that, um, you would be willing to look at legislation or some opportunity to work with Congress to help strengthen that recruitment and retention that's gonna be Mm-hmm. your biggest problem as you well know you and I talked about in the provider Yeah. country not just um finding the providers but um in geographic locations, Yeah. Yes. you know, some of our tribes are three, four hours away from an urban area, Mm-hmm. it is very challenging. So I'd hope you'd be willing to consider legislation like the one I've introduced with Mark Wayne Mullen.
Yeah, thank you, Senator. It's a persistent challenge, a well-documented problem. I'm willing to look at all methods to reduce that vacancy rate, get more people um into our hospitals and clinics to provide these services. Um, I'm supportive of uh education pipelines. We have a we just uh signed off on a wonderful uh partnership agreement with Haskell Indian Nations University in Lawrence, Kansas. Uh, we worked jointly with the Department of the Interior on some land. We're gonna build a bigger clinic, um, on campus there, and we're also gonna get more nursing students. Um, I, if confirmed as director, I'd love to work with, uh, organizations such as AHEC and identify where can we get more nurses, where can we get more behavioral health specialists, where can we get more dentists. So, i- the, I'm very eager, um, where I see challenges, I also see opportunities, and that's why it excites me. And I wake up every morning knowing that I get to advocate for Indian country, and be that ambassador, if you will, within the department, and build those relationships, because governing is relationships. And um I th- I th- I feel like in the year in my current capacity, we've shown uh some success and a few wins, We've had a secretary that's engaged more with Indian country than any of his predecessors. And so I'm really looking forward to going through this process and if confirmed, continuing and taking that to the next level as IGES director.
Thank you. And then we also talked about this, and I I I need your thoughts and commitment on addressing this issue. Um, throughout my career, uh, protecting children and other vulnerable populations has been a core priority.
Mm-hmm.
Given past high profile failures within Indian health services involving the sexual abuse of Native American children by medical providers,
Mm-hmm.
um, ensuring safety and accountability is a top concern. And so my question to you is if confirm what specific steps will you take to ensure that IHS facilities are safe environments for children?
Mm-hmm. Absolutely, Senator. I take this issue very seriously. I find it repugnant. and it's some of the darkest pieces of our society. And if confirmed as director, I will utilize every authority, any legal authority under the director's purview to root out that disgusting and despicable behavior. I will have zero tolerance towards any matter that I become aware of. And we'll make sure that, um, under the processes laid out in IHS, that if it's criminal referral, that that happens. If it's active investigations that those occur and they occur in a timely way, that's responsive to the victim and their families.
Thank you. Thank you, Mister Cruz.
Thank you, Senator. Uh, Mister Cruz, you and I had an opportunity to speak a little bit about, uh, one O five L lease payments and, um, the concern that I expressed that it's it's this balance we've got to continue supporting tribal self-determination. Um, well, we also address the funding pressures that are associated with with both contract support costs and one O five L. Um, and I I I don't expect you to in, uh, one minute or less be able to solve the problem, but I do recognize that you have you have, um, uh, some history and some background in this in your experience at both Interior and HHS. And so, uh, what I would like is your commitment to work with this committee as well as, uh, those of us on the Interior Appropriations Committee and our tribal leaders,
Mm-hmm.
um, to really figure out how how we are addressing, um, uh, the the many issues that are in front of us with contract support costs and one O five L.
Yeah. Absolutely, Chair. I love one O five L leases. I think they are uh have really improved infrastructure in Indian country. They've been a critical tool to our six thirty eight partners. So I do eagerly look forward to you uh working with you and your team on this matter. Um this is a policy area I'm personally invested in um having been there for uh one O five L lease number one at the US Department of the Interior. And so um It's one of those really powerful authorities that does a lot of good, but can go sideways very quickly if mis-applied or, you know, mis- uh, mismanaged. So, look forward to working with you. And it's also unique because the governing part nine hundred regs apply to both the US Department of the Interior and, uh, US HHS. And so we h- I've seen it, uh, having been at both, like, we have different views about different matters on the same reg.
Well, and I think I I think it is an important one and and one that, you know, we're we're sitting here in the authorizing committee now. Um, uh, but again I mentioned my role on the appropriation side of it and just having some, some level of of a predictability when it comes to budgeting. Um, as as you know, these are these are challenges also that we have to to to reconcile, so I look forward to uh ongoing engagement with that. Um uh speaking a little bit about uh tribal self-governance um uh you we've been expanding self-governance across HHS for a period of time um uh in my view um uh some good uh good improvements and developments Um, but we also know that we've got some some barriers as to this as well. Uh, I am going to be introducing soon with the support of my Vice Chair here, uh, the Native Children's Commission Implementation Act, um, which we're really quite excited about, but we're going to be proposing in that targeted self-governance uh pilot that is focused on SAMHSA programs. Um, again, looking to ways that we might be able provide tribes with with greater flexibility. And and so I think you have shared it with me uh privately, but um can you share with the committee here uh your views or your support for the goal of expanding self-governance opportunities uh across HHS, and hopefully your commitment that you can work with with tribes and
Mm-hmm.
and those of us here on the committee and in Congress to to identify some additional areas and ways that we can move these efforts forward.
Yeah. Uh, thank you, Chair. Um, self-governance really excites me and strong supporter. So I've been very clear with the advocates when asked and, you know, the secretary is on the record, uh, both publicly and in congressional testimony being generally supportive of the concept of self-governance. I'm going expanding beyond Indian Health Service. The challenge is our authority, and that's gonna take a congressional fix. You know, our OGC has looked at this sideways, up and down, tried to get there and get creative. We just can't. So we're gonna have to work together, and I look forward to working with you and your team on that, um, to do so. Um, just a couple of observations really quick. Uh, you have the contract support costs of one O five L, uh, matters that um you always have to be aware of when it comes to six thirty eight land, uh but also the staffing that goes behind it. You know, it it takes human capital and personnel to approve both the contracts, the title one contracts and the title five compacts, the review of the audits, there's just a lot of human capacity uh that is involved and so right now, all of our are not set up that way, so that would take, you know, additional um, capacity and resources from Congress.
Okay, well, we will definitely look forward to working with you on that. Senator Rounds.
Thank you, Madam Chair. Uh Mr. Cruz, first of all, thanks for the opportunity to meet in our in our office. I I appreciated it. I um really thought that you were thoughtful in the way that you responded to a number of the inquiries we made with regard to improving the quality of life an- and an- and an Indian country, and in particular with nine um treaty tribes within South Dakota, uh we care about trying to improve the quality of health care, the delivery of that on a tribe by tribe basis, recognizing their autonomy uh and their sovereignty, but also recognizing that a lot of the challenges are similar in each one of those rural areas. Uh i- in- in- Mr. Kruse, in your testimony you mentioned that one of your top priorities is improving purchased and referred care. Uh, I agree that significant improvements are needed. That's why we've introduced the S ten fifty-five, the Indian Health Service Emergency Claims Parity Act, and S six t ninety-nine, the Purchase and Referred Care Improvement Act. The Indian Health Service Emergency Claims Parity Act would move the PRC's emergency notification requirements from seventy-two hours to fifteen days. The Purchased and Referred Care Improvement Act would require IHS to develop procedures to reimburse beneficiaries for approved PRC services within thirty days and make sure that IHS addresses any unintended cost for beneficiaries with approved PRC claims I wanted you to talk a little bit about those two because on the one side right now if you're telling people you've got a you've got to be able to make a notification within seventy-two hours or you're not going to pay the bill seems to me to be really unfair to people that are in a in an emergency situation, I think fifteen days is much more appropriate. And the second part on it is, is these folks have a tough time maintaining a good credit rating anyway, but when it comes right down to it, when they're gonna start getting billed for the fact that they can't get a bill paid within thirty days, and it's because and and it's a and it's an obligation that we have at the federal level and it's not getting taken care of by IHS that really does hurt some of the poorest of the poor within our country. Can you talk a little bit about how important those reforms are, and your thoughts about trying to get those, uh, should we get these passed, um, that we get that, that, that included and operational as soon as possible?
Mm-hmm. Thank you, Senator, and I really enjoyed our conversation. Uh, for the record, it was my toughest meeting, uh, with the set of Indian Affairs Committee members. Because South Dakota has some of these naughty-thorny issues and based on our conversation I went back, talked to a couple of my colleagues at Indian Health Service to understand what that looks like and why we don't already do that um you know, seventy-two hours seems kind of arbitrary to me um so if confirmed as director I would continue to look at the Indian Health Service team, understand that and work with you and your team on this legislation because At the end of the day, my priority is patient care. And I wanna make sure that if a tribal member who happens to have an emergency in Rapid City and end up at the hospital there you know while they're up there for the weekend or shopping, you know that they're not harmed financially or otherwise uh because they didn't turn in their receipt soon enough for reimbursement. So I wanna err and and be cognizant of the real life challenges and make sure that the PRC program works for our uh beneficiaries today and contemporaneous times and that it it ultimately works, cuz we have the resources there, we we have the know-how and the knowledge, and so it just makes sense to provide those patients that flexibility.
Well I I look I I look forward to working with you. I I think, uh, our tribes have made it clear that they think that you will do a good job for them, and I intend to support your nomination. But but I really want to get to the bottom of some of these issues that
Yeah.
our our our citizens simply shouldn't shouldn't have to contend with year after year and and these are some that should be fixed it's only fair.
Absolutely.
The other item that I just wanna just touch on briefly is right now I think sometimes there's a there's a a concept there within within uh uh Indian Health that suggests they're trying to figure out a way not to pay a bill than to pay a bill. When you start talking about coming from the wrong county within a state, and uh you're not being treated in the same county that you're being treated in, or uh you're you're not supposed to go to a particular facility because it's in a different county than what you live in therefore they won't touch the billing I think we all agree that that's foolish we've tried to fix that in the past,
Mm-hmm.
and then we found once again this challenge out there and I think you and I talked about it a little bit in my office, but this is one that I think has to be resolved.
Yeah. Yeah, so, Senator, uh, thank you for bringing this matter to my attention. I know I flagged it for the IHS team and happy to provide a written update on where we are with that um on the QFRs.
No, look, I I appreciate that and will give you that opportunity as well.
Thank you, Senator.
Alright, thank you very much. Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you, Senator Rounds. Um, I always appreciate the the questions that you have, um and and understanding um some of the the health care challenges that you face um in your region uh because it is very different than what we have experienced in Alaska. And it always hasn't been good in Alaska. Believe me, it's been pretty tough. It was very tough initially. Um but we are we are in a different place now. Um we've got two hundred and twenty-nine um federally recognized tribes in in Alaska um and yet uh through through what we've been able to do with self-determination self-governance um i- i- in in working through our Alaska tribal health compacts it's it's really quite remarkable and I think that Secretary Kennedy saw that in his visit uh last summer when he came um not only are we Are we building um uh uh infrastructure that um meets the need but we are we are in a place where our ability to deliver care um is probably uh some of the best example that you will see um in Indian country and some would argue that in in rural areas how we have done it um, through our compacting, um, is, is the promise and the model for that. And I'm not suggesting that we can take the Alaska model and replicate it everywhere, but it is a reminder to me of the extraordinary disparity that we have, um, when we think about, um, situations in, in, in your, uh, state of, of South Dakota, um, and, and what, uh, what Native people experience. um, the failures that they experience. Um, it makes me feel proud of what we've been able to do, but it makes me, uh, it challenges me to, uh, make sure that it should not depend on where you live. If you have a, a system that is designed to, uh, or a system that is there to protect Native people and to provide for their care, um, that care needs to be good and consistent throughout.
Madam Chair, if I could just respond, and I and I really appreciate your thought process on this. In in in South Dakota we have the nine treaty tribes. These are tribes that by treaty have established their sovereignty, but they've also established a relationship, a direct relationship with the government of the United States. And part of that agreement was the issue of health care and responding to the to the health care needs.
Mm-hmm.
So our tribes, uh, uh, they have an understanding that this is by treaty right. should be provided by our government. And they're frustrated because as a, as a treaty right, they, I think there's a thought that it should be provided and that we shouldn't have to be fighting for it all the time.
Mm-hmm.
The, the, the challenge that I have, because I, I don't think it's up to us to tell them how to get that health care provided to them, but we should be working with them in a consultative way to to make it deliverable based on what their needs are and the way that they would like to work with the government on it. And so, uh, whether it be by Compaqs, by six three eights, or directly through Indian Health, uh, I've shared with them that this is a decision that that they need to make, but we will help where we can to try to facilitate that final decision that that they do.
Mm-hmm.
And, uh, i- I I personally think that IHS needs to be a payer, but not necessarily the direct provider. I think that might be more efficient and provide a higher quality if we went directly to organizations that already exist within our state that whose profe- who whose responsibility is providing health care, whether it be a uh a a health care network or otherwise. But this is a decision that the individual tribes need to make and then we need to help them follow through on whatever they think is the right way to provide it for their people and uh I just would would look
mmm
forward to working with you to to try to work that uh in a way that works for them
yeah absolutely thank you senator
thank you thank you madam chair
thank you senator rounds uh let me ask a a couple more uh quick questions here uh to you mister cruz um Sanitation funding. We have uh made some some good inroads as a result of the uh bipartisan infrastructure bill. Um uh we just recently received the FY twenty-six uh IGES sanitation funding allocation. Mm-hmm. These were good, they're important, um and uh, you know, for those that have waited far, far, far too long for for sanitation infrastructure, um it is it is most welcome. Um, I I am concerned though because we know that the infrastructure funds are are, uh, uh, winding down. Um, and in fairness these funds were designed to address, um, the unmet needs. It wasn't intended to re- uh, to replace the need for for sustained, um, annual investment. So we we have to continue to build on this in a in a way that um, uh, allows us to, to operate and maintain these systems long-term. So, uh, a question to you is, is, um, how we ensure that we've got solid base funding going forward for operations and, and maintenance.
Mm.
Um, a- as, as we, uh, as we move forward on this, I, when I think about the role of of just basic sanitation in meeting health care needs of of Native people,
Yeah.
regardless of where they are, to me this is pretty basic.
Yeah.
Um, clean water
Yeah.
to drink, to wash your hands, um, keep your family clean. It's pretty basic and it goes to health care.
Yeah.
So can you speak to that?
Yeah, thank you, Chair. Um, I am on the same page, same wave-length as you when it comes to the importance of sanitation and the importance to health. Um, a couple of thoughts. Um, I understand IHS uh has gotten the last of that IIJA funding out. There are over two thousand active projects I look for- if confirmed, I look forward to ensuring those come to completion. Um, I also look forward to working with the team on lessons learned and identif identifying and advocating for a robust res uh resources to continue that work. Um, I think a lot of good has been done in this space. Look forward to being partners with you and the committee and the Indian Health Service staff to uh continue that momentum. Um, the other thing, as I was asking about this when I went back after our conversation is uh, you know, tribes add their projects to this list. So it's an I always ask, like, why is it why does it seem to grow or like how do we not get ahead of it? You know, it's one of those things where things change over time and, you know, people can add projects to this list and IHS stands at the ready to work with them on it. And, you know, it's about identifying the need and us doing our job to come be effective advocates and then go work with them to get those projects in their communities. So, um, I I look f- I'm eager to get more involved in this component of the mission of the Indian Health Service.
Well, I appreciate that and I uh I invite you up to the state any time. Um, you know, I look forward actually to the day when uh I have somebody coming out from Washington DC um to understand some of our situations and challenges. And and I look forward to the time when I have a hard time finding a village that is still lacking running water and um and and clean drinking water. Mm. And unfortunately, I've got a whole long list of them. Mm. Mm. And at the same time that you you think about um what that means just from a hard life, uh I bet if you wanted to do a direct correlation to the health of the children in that village that doesn't have the drinking water versus those and and just clean water to wash in uh versus those communities that do even have minimal um I think the the the statistics would speak for themselves, so let me turn to Senator Hoven. We had a great conversation here this morning with our nominee.
Thank you, Madam Chair, appreciate it very much. Um my office received letters of support for Mister Cruz's nomination to service director of IHS from both the Standing Rock Sioux tribe and the Turtle Mountain band of Chippewa Indians, and I would ask the chairman of Phenanyms consent to any of these letters of support into the record.
Absolutely.
Uh, and, Mister Cruz, thanks for coming to visit with me. Appreciate it. Um, one of the big challenges modernizing, um, IHS.
Mm-hmm.
Uh, you know, all health care is going through the same techno- technological revolution that everybody else is, maybe even more so in some ways with AI and everything else. What are your thoughts on how you're going to uh, but IHS needs to modernize.
Yeah.
Um, what are your thoughts on how you're gonna do that?
Uh, thank you, Senator. I think first and foremost is uh, my vision and goal is when you walk into an Indian health service hospital or clinic, you can't tell the difference between um a county or other private provider. And we see that in our six thirty eight space. We just see some of the most magnificent facilities, you know, travel to Oklahoma, uh, river people in Arizona, uh, the secretary and I have gotten out into Indian country to see some of these just amazing investments into tribal communities. And so what I'd like to do is, you know, take those lesson learned from our six thirty eight partners and see what we can do on the direct service side. Um. The other issue that I'm aware of that we're gonna need to spend some thinking time on and planning on is the electronic health records. That's a significant investment, and I think that's probably one of the system's biggest deficiencies right now, uh especially when you compare it to private or other models, is we really we really wanna make sure that IHS is uh patients are not impacted by having this antiquated legacy system. So that's something I'm eagerly looking forward to learning more about, engaging with the Indian Health Service team, and coming up with solutions to bring Indian Health Service into the next generation and provide modern clean and safe health options.
You'd say you've been out some with the secretary. You mean Secretary Burgum? Is that who you're referring to?
Uh, Secretary Kennedy, sir.
Secretary Kennedy, okay.
Yeah.
Um, well, that's good. Um, and I like you mentioning the six thirty eight. I think that creates real opportunities. That was actuall was gonna be my next question, but you went there. Uh, I think that gives you flexibility to work uh and empower tribes as much as you can, and they're at different levels in different places.
Mm-hmm.
And so uh that flexibility is important. The other thing that's really important um is that you've got a lot of people in uh medical professionals that actually wanna volunteer time.
Mm.
And the credentialing process prevents them from doing it. So you've got not not only doctors but dentists and other medical technicians and folks who would like to go out to the reservation and volunteer some time and uh, but they have problems getting credentialed through the IHS process.
Mm.
What can you do about that? And I brought this up before at this committee and it it's still a barrier.
Yeah, absolutely. Look, we wanna take advantage of all the opportunities that come forward. And so Um, I kind of alluded to this in my testimony. I hire, you know, my goal is to hire smarter people than myself. One such person is Doctor Hartwig, who's a political appointee um at Indian Health Service. And so um I'd rely on her expertise around how you do some of these partnerships, um what goes into the state licensing and credentialing. Um because we s- we are in thirty-seven different states, sometimes that gets a little tricky. And so I would really have to work with um the Indian Health Service career professionals and rely on their advice and their experience on how we do take advantage of people who do wanna come in good faith and help ensure that American Indian and Alaska Native patients have quality health options and even if it is on that temporary basis.
You need to because I think you're missing um you know highly skilled help that's available if you don't. Um, define success. So if whatever point you finish in this job, uh, you look at it and say, okay, you've succeeded. What is that? Define that.
Yeah. Um, thank you, Senator. I think putting that ninety-three construction list on a glide path to completion, um, is just one of the passion projects of mine. I think also, uh, the EHR is an uh critical component. Uh, making sure that we have a game plan. We're not gonna solve it overnight. It's gonna take tribal consultation, engagement with all of our partners, tribal and urban, to ensure that we're providing, um, uh, a plan that is implementable and realistic. Um, so those two, uh, come to mind. And then three is building a strong team, um, around me, the the d- and providing that stable leadership. And then I think finally my, um, you know, last line of thinking is I wanna, e- every step in my life I've tried to leave some place better than what I found it. You know, it's a traditional teaching of ours and, um, I look at this opportunity being the same. Um, I wanna find, I wanna leave IHS better than I found it.
Yeah, I think, you know, you mentioned building that team, if if you walk out and you've strengthened that team and and they're doing a better job, that's something that, you know, outlasts you and is would be a great legacy.
Absolutely.
So again,
Absolutely.
thank you uh for stepping up and we look forward to working with you.
Thank you, Senator.
Thank you, Senator Hoven. And, Mister Cruz, I'm glad you you raised the issue of electronic um health records and the modernization effort. Um, big uh big challenge um but has to be done.
Mm-hmm. Yeah.
Uh, but just in terms of of investments is my understanding. I, you know, you're looking at almost a a billion dollar price tag here. Um, uh, but it's not it's not just the cost. You've got you've got timelines that are involved in it, um, but also how this transition is gonna impact, um, those self-governance tribes that have already invested in their own systems.
Mm-hmm.
So how how you reconcile that Um.
Yeah.
Good luck, teaser. I mean, it's it's it's it's gonna be a challenge.
Yeah.
And I mean, we see this in other in other departments and other agencies, you know, most notably within the VA and uh and the DOD. Um, they've been saying for years that they're, you know, they're they're really gonna align their systems. But in fairness, DOD is waiting for VA to align with them and vice versa.
Mm-hmm.
And so you have kind of a a square off that's that's just been hard. I mean, they're getting there and I I I I shouldn't uh I I shouldn't compound their problems by being critical about it, but it is an observation that it is not as easy as as just writing um or getting the the funding authorization for it there is, um there's a great deal of effort that uh will be required, um but it is something that w is required, so.
Mm-hmm.
a big, big part of your challenge there. Well, I think you've gotten a wide range of of questions this morning from members of the committee.
Mm-hmm.
Uh, we will keep the hearing record open for the next twenty-four hours, um, but we would like to, uh, get these submitted, uh, by the end of business tomorrow so that, uh, we can, um, we can do what the committee needs to do next, which is is hopefully move you to to a mark-up. So Um, I appreciate the, uh, the, the, the honest and direct res- uh, responses that you have given to folks and, uh, with regards to any questions for the record that will follow, that we would e- expect a level of the same. But we thank you for being here. Uh, we thank your, your friends and, and supporters for, for being here to support you and for your willingness to step up and serve. And with that, the committee stands adjourned.
Morning digest
Start every morning briefed on yesterday’s hearings
A free weekday email covering yesterday’s hearings and transcripts newly unlocked in the archive.



