Summary
- Sean Duffy (Secretary, US Department of Transportation) said FAA hired a record 2,400 controllers and replaced half its copper wiring using $12.5 billion.
- Duffy said roadway deaths fell 6.7% in 2025, while DOT canceled 28,000 illegally issued foreign truck licenses for national safety.
- Rep. DeLauro pressed Duffy on the proposed $327 million Amtrak cut and missing independent Amtrak budget request for fiscal 2027.
- Rep. Womack and Rep. Clyburn jointly backed air traffic modernization and controller hiring while debating future federal infrastructure funding needs.
- Congress must write fiscal 2027 transportation funding before September 30 expiration of supplemental infrastructure dollars amid ongoing surface reauthorization debates.
Morning digest
Get hearings like this in your inbox
Transcript
The subcommittee will come to order. You'll have to pardon us a little bit. We're uh kind of running on fumes right now. Chairman Cole had us up till midnight. And uh And I had our subcommittee
Early.
up kinda early this morning. It is early morning. So um
Early morning.
they will uh they will earn a good rest when all is said and done. Today, this subcommittee welcomes the Honorable Sean Duffy, Secretary of the Department of Transportation to testify for the fiscal twenty-seven budget. Secretary Duffy, it's good to see you. Thank you for appearing before us today. Um, the President's request for DOT is twenty six point eight billion in discretionary budget authority for fiscal twenty seven. This amount includes an increase for air traffic operations to continue efforts to hire controllers and other safety personnel, another installment for air traffic modernization, and new investments in ports, shipyards and rail safety. We're gonna hear a lot about that today. This is the first year without advance appropriations from the IIJA, which totaled a hundred and eighty-four billion for the department, from twenty twenty-two to twenty twenty-six. I appreciate your efforts, and the efforts of your department to move things forward. Since you were in front of this subcommittee last, the obligation rate for the IIJA division J dollars has increased from thirty-nine percent to fifty-one percent. In the past year, the backlog of thirty-two hundred grand has, all but, been eliminated. We appreciate that effort and would remind you of the requirements set forth in the fiscal twenty-six law regarding proper execution of programs appropriated by this committee along with new congressional notification requirements. Our hearing today serves as an example of the reciprocal relationship between this committee and the executive branch to ensure the appropriate resources are provided to DOT to meet our shared goals of safety infrastructure improvements and modernization of our transportation systems. The investments we've made together in air traffic control prove this concept. Funding to rebuild the controller workforce, combined with long-overdue modernization of air traffic technologies, uh, reflects the kind of sustained bipartisan commitment that a safety-critical mission demands. This work is far from finished, and the challenges ahead are significant. The progress we've made shows what's possible when Congress and the Department focus on common priorities and follow through with real resources. As we look to fiscal twenty-seven, we know more needs to be done. For the seas, we need to ramp up our investments in the nation's maritime workforce and infrastructure to ensure we have the commercial competency to compete globally. This will also support our national defense capability in the Indo-Pekom region and elsewhere. For our surface transportation infrastructure, we're on the precipice of a reset following the expiration of the IIJA. How we build upon what worked and how we course correct from those investments that were serving political pipe dreams is the key question in my opinion for fiscal twenty seven. I look forward to seeing what our authorizing counterparts put forward. They're in the process of doing that as we speak. and we stand at the ready on the Appropriations Committee to cut the check when the time comes. I should be clear, however, that this committee has the sole jurisdiction on discretionary funding. Efforts to recreate the advance appropriations of the IIJA are ill-founded and not to be contempl- contemplated without the full involvement and deliberation of this committee. The invite remains, Mister Secretary, to come down to Arkansas's third district and see how the investments of your are flowing into communities like mine. The department is a unique department in that way, as the impact of your work is seen in every single congressional district. As such, this committee enjoys a history of bipartisanship, and I look forward to continuing as we begin the fiscal twenty-seven process. Speaking of which, I'd like now to recognize my dear friend and the ranking member of this subcommittee, Mister Clyburn of South Carolina, for any opening remarks he prefers to make. I now recognize the gentleman from South Carolina for that purpose.
Thank you very much, Mister Chairman, and welcome back, Mister Secretary. DOT's primary mission is to invest in solutions that improve transportation safety. This includes safer transportation in our skies, on our rails, in our ports, and over and under our bridges. According to the American Road and Transportation Builders Association, there are more than nine thousand five hundred bridges across my home state of South Carolina. And more than two thousand one hundred and thirty of them are in disrepair. To make matters worse, another six hundred bridges are structurally deficient, a number that has grown over the last three years. As you might be aware, South Carolina is the fastest growing state in the nation. This means that as we welcome more people and businesses, there will be more wear and tear on our roads and bridges. At the same time, South Carolina ranks among the highest for fatalities on our highways. According to the Insurance Institute of Highway Safety, in one year alone, twenty twenty three, My home state has seen more than one thousand fatali- fatalities on our roads, including in rural areas which face unique safety challenges. And this is not unique to South Carolina. In fact, the American Society of Si- Civil Engineers gives United States infrastructure a C grade. Uh, although an improvement uh from C minus, which it was before, it is in part attributable to the major investments enacted by this body. The bipartisan infrastructure law made a historic five-year investment in our nation's transportation systems. Whether it is helping to repair efficient bridges or improve our ports, these investment investments are intended to enhance safety, employ American businesses put more people to work and create new uh private uh public partnerships i am pleased that our colleagues in the house transportation and infrastructure committee have begun their work to reauthorize so many uh of the programs important to our districts however i am concerned that the committee this committee is not at the table uh to support another tranche of much needed supplemental advance appropriations. As you are aware, the bipartisan infrastructure law included an additional thirty six point eight billion annually over its five year span to help meet our transportation infrastructure needs. Unfortunately, no new supplemental funding will be available beyond September thirtieth of this year. I implore my Republican colleagues and you, Mister Secretary, to impress upon our leadership and the White House to help ensure that this committee continues to help close the gap on transportation projects across the country. I believe this subcommittee can work in a bipartisan fashion to deliver safer transportation networks for the American people. And I look forward to hearing from you, Mr. Secretary, about how we can best use America's resources and talents to build a safer, more secure country. Now with that said, Mr. Secretary, I would be remiss if I did not raise on this panel today my concern with your great American road trip. While I agree with the importance of having boots on the ground, so to speak, To learn more about the complexities of our transportation and travel needs across the country, it's important to keep in mind the millions of struggling taxpaying Americans who are not afforded the same opportunities. My hope is that as you move it around the country, you will include some roads less traveled. Now, while I do not argue with Robert Frost, I believe that what really makes a difference is in our lives, or the people we encounter during our travels, irrespective of which road one might take. It is my collective duty, our collective duty to make America's greatness accessible and affordable for all, not just some. And with that, Mr. Chairman, Uh, you're back.
Thank you, Mister Clyburn. And at the risk of uh patronizing the overall chairman, let me just say as I said earlier today, reimagining the appropriations process for this Congress has been a challenge for a number of years, dating all the way back to the time, Mister Secretary, that you were serving in this great body. This guy to my right that's about to speak deserves a lot of credit for moving us toward a much more perfect and meaningful process. He's done it skillfully, he's done it very patiently, and against great odds. And I want the public to know how grateful I am and how grateful this committee is for the work of our overall chairman, Mister Tom Cole of Oklahoma. You're recognized, sir, for five minutes.
Well, I thank you for that very generous and fulcrum but i can tell you any success i had wouldn't happen without my friend the ranking member uh because this is a bipartisan exercise in appropriation it always is and uh i'm particularly proud of this subcommittee because the bipartisanship that exists between its chairman and its ranking member and how well they've worked together uh so thank all of you and thank all the other members for being here secretary duffy welcome to back to uh thank you so much for appearing before this subcommittee again And for your continued leadership and service, I particularly want to commend you for your commitment to modernizing our air traffic control system. Upgrading aging air traffic control infrastructure is long overdue, and your leadership and urgency on this issue are exactly what is needed. As we move through fiscal year twenty twenty seven, uh, I remain focused on maintaining responsible investments in our nation's transportation system. Uh, as uh Chairman Womack has already stated, team has already made uh exceptional efforts to ensure that we're investing taxpayer money uh in uh infrastructure and safety uh improvements that are worthwhile taking a hard look at thousands of funding decisions to make sure they deliver real results for the american people you're to be commended for that the subcommittee furthered these efforts uh in the fy twenty twenty seven bill uh under chairman womack and ranking number library and leadership, supporting programs that improve infrastructure while scrutinizing those that are wasteful and duplicative. Uh, but make no mistake, we've not uh sacrificed DOT's safety mission in that process. Over the past three fiscal years, this subcommittee has made the hiring and training of new air traffic controllers a top priority and our FY twenty-seven bill was supporting twenty-three hundred new controller candidates on top of the twenty-five hundred we funded in fy twenty six reflecting the committee's commitment to rebuilding the controller workforce that keeps our skies safe and the economy moving i also want to recognize your personal interest and support for the mike monroney center in oklahoma city and your determination to supercharge controller hiring across the board that attention has made a real difference and it reflects a genuine understanding of what this facility means to the safety of our tire aviation uh system. We have uh the land, the facilities, world-class staff at Oklahoma City to insure that uh controllers receive in-person focused and state-of-the-art training. I'll continue to fight uh for the funding that this center needs to modernize and expand. And I'll frankly pu- push back any efforts to decentralize a week in what we've built there. This uh commitment extends beyond controllers alone. aviation safety depends on a full complement of qualified safety personnel across the faa i will also reiterate my steadfast commitment to prioritize investments in tribal and rural areas and the fy twenty seven bill under uh mr. womack's leadership demonstrates that commitment nearly seventy percent of america's uh road miles are in rural areas and about a hundred and forty five thousand of those miles are on roads
I thank the chairman.
Thank you.
And what I said about Mister Cole goes for uh the ranking member as well, Mister Deloro of Connecticut. Um, it is a true partnership and we're grateful for your leadership as well, ma'am. And I recognize you for five minutes.
Thank you very much, Mister Chairman, and it is uh an honor for me to work with uh both you and and ranking member, Clyburn, to work with you and Chairman Cole as we make sure that the appropriations process is as strong as it needs to be and that it is um really where the power of the purse resides and thank you very much um uh thank you uh mister secretary for testifying today we look forward to your testimony and to uh hearing your answers to our questions uh america's transportation infrastructure is crucial it's crucial to the economic health of our country it connects communities expands prosperity extends opportunities to people across this country, from big cities to small towns. Unfortunately, the President's budget request proposes substantial cuts to many of the programs and initiatives that Americans rely on. The budget proposes to cut three hundred and twenty-seven million dollars from Amtrak, including two hundred million from the Northeast Corridor and a hundred and twenty-seven million from the national network. Amtrak is crucial to my home state of Connecticut, where nearly one thousand of their employees are based. More than two million travelers were served by Amtrak in Connecticut, um, in twenty twenty five, and they f- facilitate an incalculable quantity of economic activity. Uh, investing in this service they provide is essential for supporting so many of my constituents. Uh, so I I'm disappointed to see, um, uh, such steep cuts proposed, uh, in the president's budget. It's crucial that this administration restore Americans' faith in the safety and security of air travel. Following a series of tragic incidents last year, uh, I understand the FAA, I understand that the FAA recently revised downward their projections for necessary air traffic controllers, the staffing levels, to maintain safe skies by roughly two thousand positions. And as we approach some of the busiest travel months of the year, the administration needs to do everything it can to provide the American people with the assurance that they will be safe in our skies. We didn't we need to know what is needed as appropriations committee to be able to provide the resources needed to keep pa- people uh uh uh safe uh uh to keep our our aircraft moving uh making the airspace more efficient. The American people are struggling every day uh with the rising cost of living and robust transportation infrastructure is key to connecting
Thank you. Uh, Mister Duffy, Mister Duffy, your uh full written statement will be included in the record. your uh full written statement will be in the record. And at this time, I recognize you for five minutes to summarize your remarks.
Uh, Chairman Womack, Chairman Cole, uh, Chairman Rogers as well, uh, Ranking Member Claburn, and uh, Deloro, thank you for having me. It's good to be back in the house. Uh, it's great to have such wonderful attendants, even though you guys are supposed to be gassed, you're all here. It's great for me. Um, I I I I hope today we do have a chance to talk about what Mister Claburn uh mentioned about the the bridges. uh it's an issue um and you also mentioned and we all know this that our infrastructure has a c rating um and i think as we sit here together um this is probably the most bipartisan place in this whole body uh we all work together because there is not a republican road or a democrat bridge um there's not a republican safe airport or a democrat safe airport it's we are all in this together as one american family and doing this together um i think is is critically important and uh chairman kohl i would agree with you on tribal lands as well making sure that is not forgotten uh in rural places like where i come from uh the road less traveled um is one that i have been on for a very long time so uh to the committee thank you for having me and again it's good to be back uh in the house uh for the past sixteen months with your support the department of transportation has been hard at work uh delivering wins for the american people we have a once in a generation opportunity to revitalize the critical infrastructure that millions of Americans rely on every single day. From our one rays, to our roads, to our railroads, we have upgraded our national infrastructure, invested in the backbone of our economy, and made life safer for American families. We are aggressively moving to clear the backlog of three thousand two hundred grants that were left behind in the last administration. Our goal is simple. to ensure that these grants deliver safe, enduring infrastructure that will serve Americans for generations to come. At the FAA, we have kick-started a historic overhaul of our air traffic control system. This has made it, this has made it possible because of this Congress and I am grateful for that. Thanks to the Working Families Tax Cut Act, we received twelve point five billion dollars as a down payment to begin deploying state of the art equipment across our airports and NASS. um and that work is underway we replaced fifty percent of legacy copper wiring converted two hundred and seventy eight radio sites installed fifty eight new surface awareness systems and transitioned seventeen towers to electronic flight strips but technology is nothing without people we need the people our air traffic controllers so since march we've hired a record-breaking two thousand four hundred air traffic controllers and we had an innovative gamer uh campaign we realized at the academy as we surveyed the the the the students uh uh out of two hundred and fifty surveyed uh all of them but three are gamers and so we made a pitch to the the gamers by the way they have multiple screens yes um they're problem solving and they're talking at the same time we received over twelve thousand applications in twenty four hours to be an air traffic controller it was it was it was quite historic um we smashed the old records it was a great ad campaign um and Uh, but it's, it is truly bringing in the best and the brightest who wanna serve their country, and and they're and they're concerned about safety. And I think these are the young men uh and women we're bringing into this field, that that is so important. We're also restoring integrity and safety to the American trucking industry. It was the policy of the last administration to allow for unqualified foreign drivers to get behind the wheel of a truck. Those days are no more. Uh, we just saw an incident in California a couple days ago, I think it was yesterday. um i think we all have to work together to have the right policy in place to make sure that our roads are safe and what should that policy look like uh i have my ideas on on what we need to do together we've worked uh with states to cancel twenty eight thousand illegally issued licenses for unqualified foreign drivers and we're holding um some states that aren't cooperating accountable we all need to follow the same rules we've also knocked more than twenty thousand drivers out of service for failing to meet basic requirements like reading the road signs or being able to communicate with law enforcement these changes aren't just keeping you and your family safe on the road they have added benefits to boosting wages for the great american truckers uh who serve our communities every single day our commitment to historic safety standards is already delivering historic results um in twenty twenty five we successfully reduced roadway deaths by six point seven percent across the nation mr. Kleibernath be happy to talk to you more about what's happening in south carolina but the numbers nationally have come down and that is a good thing uh this is the fifth largest drop in roadway deaths uh in the history of DOT so we're making progress we have a long way to go um we're at you know thirty six thousand plus deaths a year still way too many uh but we're making progress we're going in the right direction we're working on our freedom to drive initiative working on bottlenecks um uh across the country making sure we can alleviate uh traffic snares um i'm gonna try to move through this uh quickly but i wanna talk uh about um what we're doing uh collaboratively with states to finally make transit safe and clean and dependable i'm a republican and uh i recognize that our states do not work our cities not our states our cities don't work if we don't have good transit systems Um, but I do think we should expect from those systems that they are clean, that they're safe, uh, the people want to ride them. You should have your, well I have a, your sixteen year old daughter should be able to take um, the subway or the transit system at seven o'clock at night on a Saturday. And if we don't hit that standard, we have work to do together to make sure that is, the bar is high for us, to make sure that people wanna ride and they can ride and they can safely ride, cuz a lot of people can't afford. to ride other forms of transportation. So I think we owe it to our uh fellow brothers and sisters. I I would like to just mention bef- before I turn it back to you, Mister Chairman, I would at one point like to talk about the Merchant Marine Academy. Uh for those of you who have been there, um that's wonderful, if if you haven't been I'd ask you to go. Uh these are some of the most amazing young men and women, um have such great heart. And this, their academy was built in the nineteen forties, after world war two. and um it's as a service academy as americans i don't i don't think our our young men and women deserve to have um the buildings the heating systems the lack of dishwashers um i believe that either we have to invest in this academy um and in these young people or um i don't i love i love i love that i have it and you have it on this committee but if we're not gonna make the investments you gotta shut it down maybe you gotta give it to the navy and i don't want you to do that but we we can't let these kids american men and women in this academy have this kind of infrastructure we can't and because we let it go for so long it's gonna take a lot of money and that's the decision that you all have to make but i'll i'll plead with you cause if you haven't been there go see it and and and talk to the midshipmen and you'll be heartened to see the men and women that wanna serve this country and be mariners. So I've gone way over, Mr. Chairman, I apologize for that. I'm looking forward to your questions and uh thanks for having me again.
Uh thank you uh Mister Secretary and and on the subject of the Merchant Marine Academy there's a couple of kids from my hometown and Rogers it will be incoming freshman uh class of twenty thirty uh so you have my commitment to visit uh the Merchant Marine Academy uh we owe that to you.
Thank you.
We have um um typically start with the the leadership of the subcommittee, but today I'm going to yield first to Mister Shreve of Indiana. He is performing double duty today, not only is he a member of this subcommittee, but he's also engaged in the mark-up on TNI, on the service transportation bill. And so at this time I'm going to recognize Mister Shreve for any questions he may have. You're recognized for five minutes, sir.
Uh, Mister uh, chairman thank you very much i appreciate this privilege uh mr. secretary thank you uh for appearing uh before us thank you for spending some time in my state looking at a bridge project and and many other things i am the newest member of this subcommittee so this is a particular uh privilege uh and i serve on uh tni where we're obviously wrestling with the uh a surface reauthorization today and so there's a lot going on two floors down i'm looking at this as a new member but through the lens uh of both the appropriator and an authorizer uh i am from indianapolis where we met last time my district uh runs south and east uh our motto back home is we're the crossroads of america and that's not just a slogan indianapolis my district includes material portions of i sixty five i seventy i seventy four i sixty nine uh i've got parts of i four sixty five were a major short line rail state. We're talking a little bit about rail safety, uh, today and and beyond, two floors down. The Indianapolis International Airport's in my district. It is the top-ranked mid-sized airport in our country, and it's the home to the second largest FedEx Air Hub. So there's there there there's my uh my my pitch for Indiana's sixth district. Hoosiers know how to move freight. And we also know what happens when the system fails. In recent years, Hoosier families have suffered tragedies. involving commercial drivers who should not have been behind the wheel of eighty thousand uh uh pound rigs. Secretary Duffy, you have taken steps at your department, including stronger English language enforcement for commercial drivers and broader push to remove unsafe drivers from our highways. I wanna focus on what Congress, our Congress, can do to help you finish the job. Our protections are only as strong as the systems we rely upon That's why I'm co-leading legislation to modernize DHS's save system, so immigration status checks
Good.
to non-domiciled CDLs come back currently and quickly. Indiana has been cracking down since April first, just since April first our state has revoked eighteen hundred non-domicile uh domiciled CDLs. What else does this Congress need to codify or fund to help your department and F m csa keep in eligible and unsafe drivers off of our roads
uh thank you congressman not uh bad at freight and ok at basketball um in indiana and i appreciate your work on the on the save act that's uh that's important on the save um uh system so here's i want to to to to be clear to everybody on the committee uh the issues we've had with commercial driver's licenses um has been a nation wide problem there's not a difference between a democrat state and a republican state alike all the states uh perform poorly meaning they're they're giving uh commercial driver's licenses to uh people who maybe should not have been in the country at all they were illegal um or others who had come into the country in the last four years and they were given a driver's license for way longer than their work permit and so we've uh now modified the rules and um we're not allowing for the new rules on commercial driver's licenses to operate that way anymore one of the problems we have though is i don't have the authority to retroactively look at the all the thousands tens of thousands of commercial driver's licenses that were previously issued um and and encourage or incentivize states to take those drivers off uh the road and just one of the issues at play here is for an american truck driver to get a commercial driver's license we look at their record what do they have drunk driving so have speedings like who are they as a driver we'll look at their criminal records so we get a full purview into who these men and women are they that are gonna buy the uh drive these eighty thousand pound rigs when we've had uh people come into the country recently it's very challenging for us to look at their records and so we don't know who they are what is their driving record and i think that's creating some risk to the system and if you're going to church or you're going to walmart um you should be safe you should be the best drivers on the road not um some of the ones that are killing our families
uh so i'm i'm hearing that you don't have the data sharing tools or all those tools that that your department needs
uh i don't i don't have all the authority that i need and i would like to work with this committee in a bipartisan way to to talk about what should it look like
mmm
what should the rules be um and look forward and look back
i appreciate that
can i can i mention one other thing we we just uh launched the modus um system where we have a lot of these chameleon carriers and they are um you'll have one address that has a a hundred or a hundred and fifty trucking companies at one p o box or one address and just you guys see this across across the spectrum the technology is old
yeah
and we have a hard time dissecting the the the all the information so modus has come out uh new software system that's allowing us to actually have per view can have a hundred or ten or five trucking companies from um in in one peel box that's that'll that'll be a sign of fraud we should also have a conversation of do we want foreign operators in eastern europe or somewhere else to own trucking companies in the us and have a hundred trucking companies we're seeing some fraud with that as well we could work together on tightening up those rules that will drive the safety and and reduce fraud.
Miss, Mister Secretary, I would love to delve deeper into the problem of chameleon uh carriers, but I so appreciate your indulgence uh, Mister Chairman, and I yield back.
Thank you, Mister Chief. I'll recognize myself now for five minutes. Um, Mister Secretary, the the twenty-six uh, TIHUD bill requires billed awards to be based solely on the selection criteria in statute. That criteria include the extent to which a project improves safety, Quality of life, economic competitiveness, state of good repair, and cost effectiveness. Your FY twenty-six build NOFO issued in December includes project labor agreements as part of the economic competitiveness consideration for applicants. But I wanna talk about that for just a minute because I think every state that has, uh, and my staff can correct me if I'm wrong, every state that has an anti-PLA law is represented on this appropriations committee. Um, so, can you walk the committee through your rationale to add PLA preferences back into the NOFO?
So, the PLA's uh uh uh option is in there, but I believe there's ten criteria. So, a state like Arkansas would not be penalized at all if you have a, if you're one of the twenty-two states that uh don't allow for PLAs, there's no penalty to your state in access to the built grants. Um, it's one of uh ten factors that can be considered um in in the process. So it's not exclusionary at all.
What specific analyses or procurement reviews or economic calculations has the department conducted to evaluate whether a a PLA preference is um makes you know, or economically competitive? Can you help me understand what background you have to make those determinations.
well we'll look at um we'll try we'll ask for data to be submitted information to be submitted but eh eh we we we isn't you know this we want good good projects and projects that um we're not going to spend just a lot of money on to spend money we want the deliverable um and does it make economic sense as well um and so we'll uh we'll ask for information from uh from the project sponsor And then we'll analyze that and I'm not not to shock anybody, but sometimes people fudge information to us. Um, and we have to go through and suss out the truth of of the information that was submitted to make a a determination.
Well, I ask the question only because, uh, we wanna make sure that, uh, non-union states like my state of Arkansas can remain competitive. Uh, and it's good to know that they're not gonna be punished, uh, for having, uh, those, uh, those types of prohibitions. Um, finally as you know I've championed funding to address the chronic shortage of safe parking for American truckers. Our twenty-seven bill made uh another installment in this priority. The trucking industry, state DOTs and local communities are watching closely to see how the department moves on these grants. This is not a single agency problem. Um, it crosses the federal highways infrastructure portfolio and the federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration's safety and hours of service mission. It's not just a convenience issue, tired drivers who cannot find a legal safe place to stop are a safety hazard. And you don't have to drive America's interstates, particularly at sundown, to understand where these truckers are finding some relief. They're on our exit ramps and entry ramps.
That's right.
Um, can you provide us with an update on the implementation of this program, and specifically when you anticipate the release of a no-fo?
Yeah, so first I appreciate the committee's work in making sure it was two hundred million dollars for uh for truck parking and you're right uh you go to a a on-ramp or off-ramp on any freeway at sundown we have trucks uh pulled over they're looking for places to park sometimes spending upwards of an hour looking for a place to park and it becomes a safety hazard and a safety risk for the drivers but also uh for um uh those commercial drivers so i i believe it's either uh this week or the start of next week that nofo on the two hundred million uh will come out and if i i do think if the uh the money comes back for a second round of of truck parking i do think there could be an opportunity that we could work on is there is there a way we could expand the money that this body gives to have a public-private partnership where we bring in private capital to um truly expand and give us more uh parking across uh the country on our on our freeways and interstates
are federal highways and the motor carriers working on a joint framework on on this how these funds are gonna be deployed
well the world we've uh ost is uh putting out the the nofo and we worked with all uh all the modes and we'll together work through the best uh applications there's some there's a there's a thought process on how we could do that and um how we should look at
well
where we do it is it sporadic or is it on you know several different routes
we have another installment that's in our bill that we marked up this morning and will be in front of the full committee in a couple of weeks but i wanna make sure that truck parking will continue to be a priority of your administration
and i think we're going to ask for a quick turn um uh of the nofos so we can make determinations and get those dollars out relatively quickly
i thank the gentleman
thank you
mister cliborne
thank you very much mr chairman uh mr. i've got a a safety question uh that uh is a two-parter uh one involvement manpower the other uh methods um the first one is you know we've uh spent what ninety six million dollars to um hire a new air traffic controllers and i understand that um uh there's been a sort of a new supercharged hiring process uh that is uh is being undertaken uh but it's been called to my attention that the uh NACRA uh the air traffic control union uh is not involved in this process at all uh could you explain why uh the group representing uh the employed uh we're not
yeah
was not brought into this
that's a a great question thank you congressman for asking it um so just if you give me i'll try to be quick the historic level of staffing up till twenty twenty four was the one point eight seven uh which is what we've gone back to right now um and it was bumped up to a higher staffing level um for the last two years but historically that's the number that we've determined is a safe staffing level um to operate the national airspace but because of the disagreement between the faa that wanted the historic number and natca that wanted the the bigger number um you all told me to go to the transportation transportation research board and have the transportation research board independent nonpartisan look at this and tell us what's right what's right staffing levels and they did come back and they've said that the staffing level that we've come out with the historic staffing level is the right level not the heightened one from from Natkin i just i do work very well with Natkin the team and i'm grateful for the controllers and have a wonderful relationship with them
well i i hope that the relationship will continue because i uh do believe irrespective of what one's feeling may be about uh organized labor uh when there is a legitimate group uh representing employees uh i think uh irrespective of what not we follow their suggestions bringing them into the process uh i think uh is a good thing uh my other uh question on safety is this now i understand uh that um our commitment to modernizing uh your efforts uh has been uh met with some skepticism about a fee that you talked about charging uh in order to uh facilitate that modernization could you tell me a little bit about this fee and
oh no thank you that was someone had asked me a question um uh about how could we fund this so i would tell you i the twelve and half billion that you all gave me um i'm by the way that was a leap of faith that was truly a leap of faith because this goes back to next gen and early uh early two thousands we knew this was a problem and you all gave billions of dollars and the you never got the deliverable and so the you've seen all the aviation incidents and you took a leap of faith and given us that money i'm i'm grateful for but that's not enough so we're doing the infrastructure i mentioned the the telecom and the radios and the radars all the all all that's being done but the deliverable for the american people the magic for the american people is gonna be the software cause i think people don't wanna be delayed they don't wanna be cancelled if it's a mechanical issue or it's weather like we we can't control that but would have more uh more airplanes commercial general evatels drones in the airspace and the software is a big part of it and i don't have the i keep asking for money uh i haven't got it yet i'd love if you all want to give it to me um but if that wasn't the case another option i'm just an idea factory over here if you want to charge a fee and put that on to you know come in and and fund this um but but i prefer that you all just gave me the dollars And just if i can make one other clarification, the the way this works is that you're very strict in how I could spend the twelve point five billion. I don't have a lot of latitude. I wish I had latitude to take some of the money and move it towards software development. I don't think we wanna wait till the twelve point five billion is deployed and we got a better infrastructure and then you're like, well then let's take another three years and start to develop the software, like we sh- we I think we could do it all together. And that's what I'm
You have you given us a plan of how you would do this and how much it would cost
um yeah yeah i have i i think i did um i so i'm i'm gonna ask for uh so i wanted another uh i originally i was at thirty one point five billion dollars you gave me twelve point five well in everyone here has a problem with a uh a tower in their in their community everyone calls me about their towers cause they're really old i took the tower money out now and i'm asking for ten point two billion i think you all are gonna give me money for towers in your own districts cause everybody has a problem cause it's really old but the ten point two gives us some money for the chicago um the the the chicago tower and then gives us the money for um the software that we're gonna need now i'd happy to i i
well it's hard time has expired but i
i i would i would welcome to sit down and or give your team a call on what we wanna do
please please cause i'd like to know little more about this fee
sure
thank you mr. Kleibern mr. mr. kohl
you're welcome
uh thank you very much and again mr. secretary as i said in my opening remark we very much appreciate your focus on the mike monroney center and and uh getting a handle on this problem with the uh air traffic controllers how many of them we have producing i know that over many years uh uh we've gotten a a high washout rate which in some ways is reassuring cause it means the standards are high and and uh they're tough to meet But I know you have a particular focus on trying to improve the student graduation rate. Could you tell me a little bit about what you're doing and what kind of success you're having in that regard?
So, you you bring up a good point. Uh, the the washout rate is about thirty percent and you we want a washout rate. We don't want everyone that gets into the academy to graduate cuz you you you need the best ones and the and the right ones. Uh, thirty percent is too high. Um, and so we've had some unique an unique set of problems where we lost some students um last fall um and that's brought our washout rate back up cause they count as a washout um but what has been the the ad campaign to bring in excited young people to be controllers uh you know coupled with the time frame we've truncated the time frame that you can apply in in until you get a seat in the academy it's thirty nine days it was uh pushing a year before and by the way that was not an easy uh problem to grapple with probably one of the most difficult problems to grapple with how do we truncate the time you know get the physicals get the testing you know and get a spot in the academy um so that is still a work in progress but it um it should be lower than thirty percent but we had some unique problems in the fall
uh couple you and i'm sure you're aware of this uh recently we had the faa director mr. bedford out there which was i think the first time we've had a visit and seven or eight years really appreciated it appreciated the team uh very very impressive uh uh group that you've assembled there um could you talk a little bit about the importance when you're training of having literally direct trainers there with them not you know not trying to do all of this over the uh over the internet makes a big difference to have real instructors in a face-to-face relationship with students
so just to to be clear i i did beat the administrator to the academy i i've been there early in my tenure so um and it's it's a remarkable facility um and uh oklahoma city is the hub and they do an excellent job but you do want um hands-on skilled training this is not something that you do uh over the internet uh we get experienced controllers um experienced professors to come in and give great instruction to the young men and women at the academy um and if by the way if anyone hasn't been to the academy you should actually go and see the training facilities um in oklahoma city it's it's it's quite remarkable um and and one of the and you know this one of the issues that we have is the throughput through the academy and uh it's it's you need to get the right the right professors and the right um former air traffic controllers in um so we can move students through the system we've also offered students cause if you get if you fall behind you're just you're taken out and so we've offered uh tutoring services so if you fall little bit behind and you're you're you're an energetic smart young adult we can keep you in the program you gotta still you gotta still meet the scores you still gotta meet the benchmarks but if you just need a little extra help we're offering that to the young people uh who are there to get them you know to get them through and that can be helpful on the washout rate just a little extra time that you can give to someone can make a big difference for a great air traffic controller.
appreciate that uh i'm running up on the end of my time uh but i would like to ask you to i know we know we've got the olympics coming in twenty eight unusually oklahoma city is actually a minor part of the site we're not los angeles but we have softball and water sports and uh you've got a uh system of distributing the the monies we vote which seems to be working well but could you sort of tell us where you're at in that process
yeah so you uh you all sent uh a pot of money and uh i could i could uh walk through how that money is being spent but all of all of the locations for the olympics are going to um receive money obviously los angeles is gonna get a get a lot more uh for this for transit specifically almost ninety million but if you want oklahoma city or oklahoma is gonna be two point five million dollars um and again the the less you have going on with the olympics the less money you're gonna get in transit the most is gonna be
sure
california and they're getting the biggest chunk of the
not a not a complaint just uh wanted to flag it for you
california might object if we gave you as much as them this
ok thank you very much i yield back
thank you mr.
mr. Loro
thank you very much mr. chairman uh mr. secretary uh wanna talk a little bit about rail investments in rail including amtrak critical importance to the economy, particularly to my constituents and those who live along the Northeast Corridor, and rely on the service to connect them with their schools, with their jobs, uh, including myself. I take the uh, I take Amtrak twice a week, um, and love it. So I know that the uh Northeast Corridor Rail Line is a service uh, uh, it's a lifeline. Six trillion dollars of of the economic region which spans from twelve states from Virginia to Maine. Um. uh the budget request that we received from the department through omb in addition to that we've historically received a grant request directly from amtrak this year the amtrak board of directors which you are uh a member has chosen not to submit it's independent funding request to the congress um i appreciate receiving the department's request your views on this um but having the separate request from amtrak in in years past has been critical it helps the committee uh to fully understand stand how best to provide the resources to meet Amtrak's needs. Um, and while um, uh, the the chair of the subcommittee and I may disagree on the overall TTIA bill that passed out of the subcommittee this morning, I wanna say a thank you to Chairman Womack for including language that will make it a requirement um for Amtrak to submit a funding request in the future. Uh, your budget request, Mister Secretary, two point one billion dollars for Amtrak. It's a cut of three hundred and twenty seven million from last year's funding levels. to what extent did the federal railroad administration consult amtrak when it developed the two point one billion estimate for fiscal year twenty twenty seven
well uh congresswoman uh it's good to see you uh if you recall we
nice to see you
started the ovarian uh cancer caucus together which was
i remember very well
and you uh and you have been a a warrior um on that issue and i think america and those women who have ovarian cancer
thank you
need someone like you to fight for them so thank you uh for that and if it's if it's touched your life uh someone in your life you know how important it is and this body needs to pay attention to it
mmm mmm
um so thank you for that uh so we we submit as you know there's a back and forth that we have with the administration with OMB um and there are submissions that that we make and and we um work together and and come up with um uh a strategy and a set of numbers to submit to this body uh uh but i would join you i think that Amtrak is important our ridership is up we're dynamically pricing which i as as a business model is great as a writer it's not great cause my some of my prices go up when i'm travelling um i i would like to just
did you consult with am track so in terms of the two point one billion for fiscal twenty twenty seven
yeah am am track am track weighs in on you know their viewpoint um and and again we work with there's you know there's a lot of different components that go into putting this
yeah
product together to submit to you
ok uh it's my understanding though and i just um uh your request is three twenty seven below twenty twenty six but the capital plan that amtrak has laid out calls for two point four billion in in federal appropriations which is what they say is necessary uh to continue passenger operations there uh capital state of good repair activities for twenty twenty seven um so uh i've got some concern that capital and state of uh uh a state of good repair work may go unaddressed at at the lower level what are the implications if any if amtrak is funded at the lower level
well i think what's happened with amtrak is our revenues are up
right i applaud that and as the north northeast corridor
which is which is which is helpful people are people are riding right that's great and by the way in connecticut we've made as i think you're aware a lot of uh investments on rail
mmm
um in your critical juncture
right
um for for rail we made a lot of investments there
mmm
um but i think with the ridership and the extra resources that are coming in i think that's how we see the bridge being met um as we you know look at what what does the congress need to provide to amtrak and what can amtrak do on their own because of the great success of amtrak in this environment and the ridership and and the dynamic pricing
well i i i would just say look i i i i'm gonna look forward to hearing from an independent amtrak as well in the future i appreciate that and
sure
and to working with the chairman to fully understand what amtrak needs to support its rise i applaud you know the uh uh you know the increased ridership etcetera uh because it is such a a vital and valuable economic engine so uh and that you know we i i'm i'm for uh continuing to invest in rail and building the progress that we have we have made
could i ask could i mention one other thing on on amtrak we're we've worked with the unions and we've worked with uh other stakeholders
sure sure
we're and i'll i'll love to work with you as well when we get to that point but maybe you heard of this we're we're we're trying to look i don't look to europe all the time as a model of how i wanna do things but they do rail way better than we do
their rail is exquisite
they're way better and so we wanna take some lessons on how they've structured their rail and apply them here we're the only ones that do rail this way and i think if we rethink the model how it's structured not privatized well no one's i don't i will not no But I think if we do a different structure it's gonna be better for states, and I think we're gonna get better purview into how the money is being spent. And so I would, as we work through that, um, I would welcome your input and insight into what we're thinking about, but I I think we, I think we can do even better.
Look forward to that. Thank you, Mr. Secretary. Now you're back.
Thank you.
Chairman Rogers.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Uh, Secretary, welcome home
it's good to be home
you had a great career here in the in the house and you're doing great work where you are
thank you mr. chairman
you mentioned in your opening remarks about uh that your job is to work the family work for the family well you're an expert in that field too those uh nine kids uh you and the missus I wanna talk to you about two things that matter enormously in my district. Uh, the first is the Appalachian development highway system. Program has been a bipartisan commitment for over fifty years and remains unfinished. The corridors that still need to be built through some of the most economically isolated communities in America and completing that system would be genuinely transformative as we've seen in parts of the area so far tell me where adhs stands in the budget and whether the administration is committed
i
to seeing it through
uh uh i should also say i'd i i think i said former chairman it's like probably saying former marine this chairman um i'll i'll let me take a look i'd uh i wanna see where that's at i would be happy to follow up with you um on where that is and i would just note that in in your state you're right i know in south carolina the there's a lot of projects big projects and the population has changed throughout the country and how do we how do we look to those changes that can accommodate the american people and make the investments in the right places so i'll follow up with you on that project
good thank you
yes
the second uh issue is emergency relief funds um eastern kentucky has been hit terribly time and again with hundreds of roads and bridges destroyed um we also know the relief program has carried a significant national backlog uh at one point exceeding eight billion dollars which compounds as more disasters take place my communities can't wait years for the federal process to catch up to the damage on the ground that's there uh what is the department doing to expedite emergency relief uh to uh states with outstanding disaster related projects
well it the the resources that you all give me i i don't have a lot of dollars there um on the emergency front i usually look to fema to be somewhat helpful they have a way bigger pot of money for us um but it is looking to um those areas that have been hit hard by disaster and looking how we can apply grant money to those to those hard hit areas again american citizens that need the help of their government and their and their federal dot um to to make the critical investment so um if you want to talk further about what the needs are uh in eastern kentucky uh i'm i'm happy to do that and i'm not sure if there's if where the application process is um with from the state and the state dot um but i'll i'll get briefed up and i can give you a call
good thank you good luck
thank you
you're welcome
this watching coleman
Thank you very much. Thank you, Mister Secretary, for your kind words about my retirement. Um and thank you for being here. Um earlier this week, you were asked by Senator Gillibrand about the Gateway Tunnel project. Um and so this time you're going to hear from the other side of the Hudson about it. Uh your department notified the development, the Gateway Development Corporation, Commission, I'm sorry, that it was reviewing the tunnel projects for civil rights violations. And on February the ninth, the Southern District of New York put an injunction so that the federal funds would continue to flow. Could you, first of all, do you appreciate how important this gateway project is? Do you support it?
So, fir- first I will say congratulations, uh, not just service in the house, but a long, uh, line of decades of government service. So thank you. And I As I mentioned, you're going to, in an odd way you're gonna miss it. Um, you're gonna miss all the fights and the bickering and good times.
You're not gonna take all my time up saying nice things to me.
I'm not, but I will but, but I will tell you. Well, you deserve nice things to be said.
Thank you.
Yeah, this is, as I mentioned to the Senator, this is the largest project in the Western hemisphere.
It's so vitally important, I, yeah.
You have,
Um.
you have no argument from me what what we we we we have to also follow the law. And the, and um, that's what the push was on the project and
i'd yeah i wanna ask about that specifically
sure
what is the status of the civil rights uh review what were the reasons that it was even an issue
well it was there there was uh three projects and there was a lot of press and commentary about how they were going through race based contracting and dbe is is important and you know disadvantaged businesses and and looking at that but the supreme court said you just can't base it one factor can be race one factor can be sex but that can't be the only factor and that's what we found was the the way they were doing it and they've admitted that they said they'll change the way they contract and so that's it's still it's the money is flowing to the project right now but um and they've agreed like no we we can't do it that way and we won't do it that way
what what is the status of the review right now
Uh, well we
Is there?
so so the the there's still pending litigation right now and it's based on that review and
Okay. Pending, right.
there's a couple of factors at play, but I we're gonna be in a good place with the project.
So I spent a a good part part of my career in civil rights enforcement.
Yes.
The whole development of um recognizing, remediating the impact of prior discrimination, which is a legitimate responsibility of government when putting out taxpayers money can you tell me when you think that this review will be done and any barriers that exist or any concerns that raise can be um addressed
so i would i would tell you that this is more of a a litigation issue than now you know probably where we're at with the in the process of the review the the the project sponsors gateway
uh-huh
has been very cooperative at this point and we're working through the finer details
So can I thank you.
on that, but not long.
As the uh secretary then could I ask you for a commitment that there won't be any lapses while we're going through this because someone gets someone high up gets mad because things aren't moving in the direction that they'd like them to move or what or what not. That we recognize we gotta get this done, this is historic.
it's a it's a very big project so um versus something unforeseeable of course i'm gonna move forward with the project
so um the ranking member of of our committee basically took my thunder was because uh obviously if i'ma talk about gateway tunnel i'ma talk about amtrak that goes through it all the time cause i do have some information i mean they're over two hundred million passengers travel each year by approximately twenty one hundred trains they run on the car each day and this includes an average of a hundred and twenty two thousand riders each and every day so i my question is when we are when we are reducing the funding towards uh amtrak that obviously has a lot of outstanding needs with so many people in it running you know twenty four seven they need to have of this um trains in good repair and systems in good repair so if we're taking this money away from them are you anticipating replacing that loss to amtrak from another account and if so what might that be
so i'm committed to making sure amtrak functions and functions well and serves people and if i could just underscore this point yesterday we announced we are going to rebuild penn station now if if gateway doesn't happen does it make sense to do penn station probably not a lot of good work to be done but it's also in new york and it's trains and we're fully engaged going through that process and the announcement
mmm
you know came out yesterday so i do care about uh uh the service it's provided and i'm making investments to make sure that um along the the the track we are um going to well serve the people who um who ride.
I appreciate that. Um, I have two really quick questions. Number one, is you have any idea why Amtrak refused or did did not put in a request?
I do, I could double check that, I'm not sure.
K, my my last little tiny question
I could
has to do with the safety issues that um the secretary raised.
So gen- he's so generous, maybe he did.
Only because only because you're retiring?
It is
and uh
and and you don't have to deal with me anymore i know like a
and and all those great things that were said about you this morning in our mark-up
you know what
i'm good
we have a number of people that are taking part in this go ahead we'll uh we'll permit it
yeah yeah you are you a member of the board
yeah i'll check
Amtrak is good
yeah i've i've an i've an identity on the board yes but i don't i don't
ok so do you do you don't know why they didn't
well i have my my uh uh the s
i mean i'm curious
s two s two sits on the board and who by the way uh is one who actually loves Amtrak a lot and cares about it and uh listen you're not gonna we're gonna be in a good place
yeah ok
um
i'm gonna i'm gonna ask my colleague to ask that other question that little tiny question i had
you're you're you're
the safety ok safety safety and security for licenses licensing of commercial trucks
you're finished
you referred to it as a problem that we're having and you kept saying that you kept implying that it were that it was non-american folks that were responsible for this Do you have data that supports that they're the only ones and what percentage of it are immigrants that are driving these trucks?
Very quickly, very quickly.
Thank you.
We gotta move on.
So, yeah, I I
Okay, can I get an answer?
I, yeah, I'll I'll I'll I'll provide data. But as a as a percentage, um, I think we're seeing a lot of these crashes, but I'll I'll look at the data and send it over to you.
Thank you, Miss Watson-Kolman.
It was it was two minutes over, by the way.
Sheriff.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Uh, Secretary Duffy, it's great to see you again. And uh, you know one of my favorite parts of this job is nominating high school students to attend our military academies and um you you made some of the best and brightest uh of our children and um we uh you know particularly as a coastal community representative uh not only is annapolis very important uh in our selection process but also i push very heavily on the uh uh the um us merchant marine academy which i was really glad to hear you bring that up cause cause i wanna focus uh my questioning uh around our maritime industry and the needs there um and and having seen your frequent visits to the merchant marine academy campus it's clear to me that you and i share that pride in our students at the merchant marine academy um but you mentioned even in your opening remarks glad to hear that cause i know what a focus you're putting on that and uh and i was also glad to hear the the chairman kinda pickup that uh that challenge to look at uh the merchant marine academy and the and the really desperate needs there uh from a facility standpoint modernization and rehabilitation of of that campus i i know there is an academy modernization uh plan and uh if if you could talk just a little bit about that and how you think this committee i i want this subcommittee to hear about the merchant marine academy as it exists now and where you think it should be going
congressman i i appreciate the question um i again i don't mean to keep calling out mr. Clyburn but he mentioned that the the rating on our roads is a c the rating for the buildings at the merchant marine academy are an f
correct
it is it's deplorable the way these kids are are are are living they didn't have hot water for four months they did a dishwasher that didn't work so they didn't have paper plates and plastic forks and so one of the problems that the committee had and i think this is fair is um the you'd sent money and the money wasn't being invested and spent and the point you made to me was hey why are we gonna give you more money if you spend the money they've already given you and i think that's a fair point from this body we have hired the um the army corps um we have their aid team from the army corps they've developed a plan um but one of the issues is that um eh there's so much there's so much work just to keep it operational and i mean
right
keeping buildings from falling down that a lot of the money goes to that um uh uh so i would say to the tune of i mean if if if this is the proposal and it's gonna come in at you know uh for capital improvement seventy million uh shut it down send the kids home and i don't want you to do that i'd i'm i'm i don't want you to i want you to make the investment but we if uh sometimes we can forget about shipping well today we're not we see how important shipping is it is i mean
mmm
almost all our products move on ships and do we wanna have american sailors sail their ships if we come into times of conflict these are the these are the men and women who sail those ships to to back up our military they're a critical you know part of national security and i think they're worth it but we can't win this i i if we did it really quick it would be about a one point five billion dollars um it's if we take a long time it's gonna be three billion dollars but every academy is is getting you know six hundred million for this some are getting brand new stadiums And these kids own a hot water.
Right.
And uh I would tell you, just please go please go see the the young men and women. Come they're gonna graduate on the on the twentieth or twenty second of June. Come and see them. And you'll say they're worth they're worth the investment, they're worth the time. We shouldn't we should not cede the maritime industry to some foreign country. It should be ours. We were the best and we should be the best in the future.
Amen. Thank you. And and secondly, let me follow that up with the um uh another issue here and that is um our us maritime recruitment that i that i know you're you're you're behind uh when i look at the two uh jones act waivers the sixty day and the ninety day that's a hundred and fifty days that our uh us flagged vessels are not being utilized when they're available now under the five O one a waiver that's asked for by the secretary of defense that precludes uh uh any even look for jones act uh vessel availability if if the waiver is under the five O one b that's done by the department of homeland security and then there's a look marat has an opportunity to look and if there's a Jones Act vessel available they get that call as opposed to a foreign uh flag vessel can can you talk about the importance of supporting our the uh our our supply chain integrity and resiliency and the impact that these waivers are having on that
so uh if if first of all that it did come from from war and in a homeland together we were advised at the at the end that this was gonna happen but we were not consulted um but if if we can figure out how we get cargo on ships um we're gonna get ship building back in america and i think that's a a a some work we can all do together cause i think we wanna build ships in america but if you think this is like cabotage so we don't let a foreign carrier fly into the us pick up passengers in new york and then fly to california
right
we prohibit that you can't do it and it's the same philosophy in maritime right we you can come in but you can't sail around our ports and i think uh if we didn't have the jones act we wouldn't have a maritime industry at all
right
um and so uh this is a unique time and um we'll get through this time and i don't see long term waivers but in in this moment um i thought again uh war has different and probably better information on what they're seeing than i had and so i don't um i i'm not gonna comment on on the decision they had to make But thank you for bringing that up.
Thank you. I'm sorry, Miss Chairman, I yield back.
Thank you. And for the record, both sides are now even. On time. Miss Torres.
Maybe not for long. Uh, Secretary Duffy, thank you so much for being here um today, I I do appreciate you being here. Uh, the City of uh Claremont um they the City of Claremont was deemed uh ineligible for a fiscal year twenty twenty five safe streets for all grant uh because one of your staff missed an email um
missed an missed an email
the missed an email but um secretary mistakes happen i i get it um but the city of claremont shouldn't be penalized for an in-house error or be forced to pay thousands more in filing for a new application Uh my ask of you today is to cure this mistake uh with the City of Claremont. They are asking for their fiscal year twenty-five application to be considered um in fiscal year twenty-six without having to reapply. If they have to reapply then they are gonna have to cover the cost, thousands of dollars that they spent in the original application. I have an email here, I don't wanna put it to the record, I'm happy to give it to your staff, which is the email that was missed um by one of the staff
uh i would i would welcome that and if if that ever happens in the future and you wanna text me to i can so i can work on remedying that
thank you ok
more quickly i would welcome a text from you to say let's make this right right now not for the next cycle
right i i appreciate that
and i'll take a look at that
i i really appreciate that in your openness to um discuss all of these different issues off-line uh with us i will reach out to you on some of priorities that we have i represent a freight corridor um the la including priorities for the la twenty eight games uh one of those is going to take place literally like twenty seconds from my front door so i invite you to come and spend some time in in my district during that time and bring that beautiful family
welcome back barbeque at your house maybe or i'm not sure
yes of course so look much has been said already in other committees that i i i don't wanna talk about in that way about the road trip um i wanna do i i do wanna say uh personally that it it it warmed my heart um it brought to me a lot of memories of my childhood growing up in a um uaw household uh and being able to afford to take camping trips in the summer in the winter um a road trip is a great way to show off our beautiful national parks as we specially as we celebrate our two hundred and fiftieth birthday um it's unfortunate that president trump is making road trips unaffordable because of his illegal war in iran the tariffs and a complete disregard for struggles of working families um the closest my the families that i represent will get to seeing the beautiful sights is hopefully they'll watch on youtube or whatever other channel that road trip that you were in because i think it was beautiful um your trip was filmed over the course of seven months twenty four days between september twenty twenty five and may twenty twenty six um i wanna submit chairman uh for the record this article which states that during the forty three day republican government shutdown um we had air traffic controller high absences um people working without pay that at the very least three of those uh days of that trip um you know secretary was on that trip um between can i put this to the record
without objection
thank you um secretary uh duffy between twenty september twenty twenty five and may twenty twenty six the national transportation safety board aviation accident database uh states that there were over nine hundred aviation accidents a hundred and sixty seven of them fatal we have major dlt issues that you've outlined in your opening statement and while i also wanna celebrate the two hundred and fiftieth birthday we have a lot of urgent needs um you have a lot on your plate i don't envy the work that you have on your plate you stated that working remotely uh didn't affect your job performance uh being the secretary of transportation is a twenty four seven job my colleagues on the other side of the aisle um were convulsing when the former secretary of transportation took um parental leave when his twins um were unfortunately ill and hospitalized so i i i want you to explain to us um or just just talk to us about how how did you manage um that remote work um Is there anything that you can suggest to us as as more and more of our staffs are asking to be allowed to do some of that work?
I'm I'm gonna I'm gonna allow him to answer the question. I just wanna remind the subcommittee here that we have a five minute rule for a reason. And if you're gonna spend most of your time editorializing, that's your call. But uh, to be respectful of everybody else's time, let's um, let's hasten along, Mister Secretary.
Sure. i listen i appreciate the kind question and
i didn't want this to be a negative thing i want you to talk about people working yes
let him answer let him answer
i i don't take it i i appreciate the question actually um so just to be clear for the committee uh this uh was done to celebrate as you mentioned america two fifty with my own mother who passed away a couple of years ago um my dad wouldn't come with us but my mom would drive us from wisconsin to arizona or wisconsin to california or wisconsin to florida uh some of the finest memories i had with her and as she had a long death the kids talked to her about the road trips i've done those with my own kids
mmm
and i think it's a great way you guys all are from beautiful places and i know you want people to come to california as well so to incentivize people to see their country i think is a beautiful thing and i'm not yeah i know you're not saying they shouldn't but um and it's one thing that actually unites us is our the two hundred and fiftieth birthday but also the beauty of our country that brings us together and so this was run through the career ethics that worked for me in the last administration and well beyond that said yes this uh this makes sense it was in partnership um with a uh with a non-profit um it's uh in conjunction with america two fifty and freedom two fifty um and this body has told me that uh one of my jobs is to promote travel and tourism i didn't make any money i didn't get i don't get anything i did it with my my my children to to
but how did you manage the
to to film it and so to to that question i think that's a great question but if you you mentioned the the the shutdown
the remote
i think between everybody here um i was sick of seeing myself at airports all over this country i was everywhere um
thank you thank you mr. secretary we we we appreciate that
and i and i and i sick of so i i did this i i did it in a way
we appreciate that i'm gonna reclaim the time here Uh, it's it's and I I want I want our members heed the gavel,
Just getting going, Mr. Chairman.
Thank you, Chairman.
heed the gavel, Mister Zinke.
Well, thank you, Mr. Chairman, Mr. Secretary. How are you, sir?
Congressman.
And uh, I wish you would have went to Montana during your trip. I'm I'm I'm glad actually you were on the front line looking at the roads a as your job would entail, as I did when I was secretary.
Maybe I did go to Montana, you just gotta tune in.
Let's talk about Montana really, really, really quick. Uh, you're, uh, you're from Wisconsin, from Montana, you know, it's rural out there. And a lot of it is our essential air service. Uh, I I see in the budget on page twenty three. The the your recommendation is identify a cut of three hundred and eight million dollars, the EAS program, EAS program. Um, you know, Montana way out there, uh, some of us regulatory, uh, some of these security systems are adding a lot of cost. Uh, and we're not Chicago. Uh, we're Kalispell or we're Butte, Montana. some of these regulations may make sense in Newark, but they don't make a lot of sense out there. And on the cut, we would just wanna make sure and have your commitment that you'll, you'll look at those and make sure we don't cut services, um, but cut regulation, which, which will end in the same place, uh, less money will be spent. But the, the services I think are essential. So, if I could have your commitment, you'll take a look at that with us and make sure we don't cut the services, uh, behind the EAS.
don't wanna cut services i had es eas uh airports in my district and i would just you as as we didn't have funding for eas during the shutdown the the the president was i was in constant contact with him we found resources to keep eas uh operational so we didn't lose service to the rural parts of america during that shutdown of forty three days so that i think that underscores the commitment that i have with the president to make sure that um that we continue to provide for the uh rural parts of the country
yeah and not that appropriations is is a american interest or american indians and tribal centric but those those smaller communities you know serve our our reservations and our indian nations as well turn uh let's turn really quick to drones love drones um but it's been a topic for a long time i started first started working in drones in two thousand three and uh the attitude from department of transportation is you know how you how we safely fly drones, we just don't fly them. So, uh, when is the integration program of the drone integration into the NAS? Where is that? Uh, are we are we gonna give the drones five hundred feet and below? Are we still gonna require them to have pilot's license? Or we are we gonna have Europe run roughshod over us on their ability to fly drones and technology? Where is the drone program in in your assessment? And and and how can we move forward safely?
that's a it's a fantastic question and uh just to take one of your points
of course i said it
i i don't want i don't i don't want somewhere else uh to um dominate the drone industry um lot of lot of information can come off of a drone uh for those who may not like us so much we want uh uh american drone dominance and so we have put out rules that allow it easier for um a lot of these uh manufacturers and service providers um to navigate in the nass um and it's it's it but it it does go to the point that we are gonna have a more complicated airspace with its with drones and with evitals um and how we manage that becomes critical and and and what kind of a beacon or squawk does each of these have um is is critical to to safety but also making sure that we can continue to innovate in the country i think we're gonna all see not new york not in d.c. but we're gonna see uh drone deliveries um uh far more frequently it is happening in a in a lot of cities um but um i think it's gonna happen uh more frequently around the country
and and and does the department have an articulated plan on milestones and timelines to for integration into the nas
we did we put we put out um a proposal and i can send that over to you uh as well and by the way you know we manage we're trying to manage there's the commercial side of it there's also as you know this all too well there's a military side of drones as well and trying to marry those two things together on the national security front but also allowing the commercial side of the innovation to happen um is what we're working with war on right now to make sure we can do both
i think we're both talking the same sheet we wanna make sure we dominate drones but some of it is precision farming wildlife management all those things that can be done more efficiently and i appreciate your work on it and with that uh with the time i yield back
pipelines
thank you mr. espion
thank you mr. chairman secretary's been about a year since you were last here we were talking about air traffic controllers back then um i speak to the controllers often and they're really unsung heroes and
mmm yes
deserve our our full support uh i wanted to ask you uh the the house t hud bill provides resources that should lead to the hiring of an an additional twenty three hundred controllers that target number is not necessarily easy to obtain
mmm
i know that we are investing in in the academy but every candidate cannot go up and down to oklahoma anybody from oklahoma here uh but i'm proud uh of my work uh to design and establish the the charles b. rangeau infrastructure workforce initiative a city college in new york which brings young talent from harlem the bronx and the heights into the trades and onto jobs like gateways second avenue subways it had more than a thousand enrollees last year um i wanna know if if there's room for this type of initiatives to uh also build the capacity for atc candidates and are you willing to work with us
yeah we do have schools that we have a program where they can be trained in and if you have a a a a college or a school that would like to um talk to us about how they could uh apply and make that happen i would be uh be happy to do that can i just make one other point on the controllers we it one part is getting the controllers into the academy
sure
and that's important getting the right students into the academy we're we didn't think i've told you this but we are we are paying uh controllers who are of the age where they can retire they're the most experienced controllers that we have and and i want them to stay so i we've offered them a twenty percent upfront cash bonus for every year they'll stay i mean
good
new controllers are great but they gotta get trained up if you have a controller that you already have the expertise we don't wanna lose them and i've had i think at least six hundred controllers have taken us up on that and so we're trying to think of it through through every different lens of keeping more in and happy to work with you on on the school that could bring more kids from harlem into air traffic control
thank you thank you so much now local hiring uh uh our aspiration is as members of congress and representing our districts is that some of these projects like Gateway, Second Avenue, Subway, my district, and of course uh Penn Station which was announced uh this week uh that we have local hiring, that people from our communities, our constituencies get those opportunities. Uh you guys, how are you guys committed to local hiring?
Um I got a look at the the policies and the no-fos and the proposals. Um I think it's hard for a community when uh to your point you bring in an outside workforce some from some far out place instead of not just giving jobs but giving training to people in your community where the projects happen i think that's always best um but the requirement on local hiring i'm not sure that i have that um but i would be happy to talk to you about it and maybe we can modify how we do the no-faults
we'd love to discuss it with you cause i think many of these projects in my case second avenue subway we don't want it just to be three subway stops we want it to be an economic engine for the community to move forward together with with that initiative
yeah hundred percent
And I look forward to working with you. Finally, uh, Mr. Secretary, uh, Secretar- DHS Secretary Mark Raymuller just told uh, travel executives that he's serious about curbing international flights to US airports in cities with sanctuary policies, which obviously could force airlines to reroute and inflict economic pain on travelers. Um, what's your position on that?
Well, I I'm not familiar with the statement from um from the secretary uh listen i i view i view what i do through the lens of america and i think all of you could attest that that's the way i have i have run this department because again you can't i can't separate your district from my hometown cause we all travel through each other's district so um i'd like to take a look at his his comments and get the context and not even ask him a question of of what he meant by that but we we have people from around the world and around the country that need to be able to fly into all different kinds of places. We shouldn't we shouldn't shut down air travel in a in a state that doesn't agree with our politics. It's again, because by the way, that role will be reversed, right, we're gonna switch, we're all we all switch, you all switch spots at one point, hopefully not too soon, Mister Chairman.
Well I'll take I'll take that as an answer and I'll yield back.
But But
Thank you. Thank you, Mister Secretary.
Thank you.
Yes, Your Joyce.
Thank you, Mister Chairman. Um, it's always a pleasure to see you, Secretary, Dr.
Good to see you.
Uh,
Good.
first question I think I asked you last time you were gonna look into it.
Oh wow.
I'm gonna bring it up again just to refresh your recollection, but it involves the Port Infrastructure Development Programme and they have substantial investments in your uh ports nationwide. Uh, but since fiscal year two thousand nineteen, The funding of the Great Lakes, despite playing a critical role obviously in domestic manufacturing, energy, transportation, strategic material movement and supply chain resilience. These ports are essential economic and national security assets, and a continual investment in you know, will help us for our long-term competitiveness and the livelihood of the region. As the department looks ahead to future PITP I shortened that, PITP uh awards and broader infrastructure investments, how can DOT better position Great Lake ports to compete for federal funding opportunities. And additionally, what opportunities do you see in which we could expand federal investment in the Great Lakes and inland systems to strengthen domestic supply change economic resilience and long-term regional competitiveness?
I I think it'd be helpful to have a secretary who actually understood the Great Lakes, maybe lived on the Great Lakes, um, was near the Great Lakes. Um, I I I'm
That's why you got that one.
I'm I'm from Wisconsin and I I I lived actually in uh Ashland, Wisconsin, where I was the the prosecutor there. It's by the way it's beautiful. um but i i i think um there's a lot there's so many needs and i think it's a it's a competition between where are the biggest needs where is the biggest bang for the buck um but i will put some attention on to the great lakes uh more so uh than i have been able to at this point cause we are trying to get some of these um other projects out but i will maybe we can work together on where is where is where where do we get the the the biggest um bang for the dollars we put in but we can't forget the great lakes it's a it's a it's a it's a incredibly important artery um that um is is beautiful and important um for this country
thank you and uh we just wanna be competitive in the uh grant uh wear uh announcements
yeah
and if you you know you can't get to it i'm gonna sick marcy captor on you
i had
and and marcy is a a a storm when it comes to these things
it's great
another question i have for you is in the wake of the east palestine derailment real safety and system uh resilience remain a major focus for communities uh surrounding my uh my district and for congress as a whole one area that has received less attention in this conversation is the software systems railroads use to dispatch and route trains through there in uh twenty twenty four the fra stated there are currently no regulations supporting the oversight of train dispatching software these computer aided dispatch systems provide rail operators with real-time information on trail on train locations track occupancy and and such given the rail industry's growing reliance on these technologies how is the department in the fra evaluating the safety and resiliency of train dispatching software today
in the software um i i don't have an answer for you right now but i will take a look at that and i could
robo rail
uh circle back you back to you with uh with fra but you know rail safety and we saw with east palestine how
right
how tragic that was in the long-term implications and one of the things i think that we do actually very well whether it's in you know whatever mode of transportation we're talking about when when bad things happen and we we don't want that cause we're safety driven but we actually learn from what's happened and try to uh improve our systems that's right um so we don't make the same mistakes over and over again we continue to get safer with better policy and better equipment
well you know this is one of the things that's being band heard about now and downstairs in the t and i hearing but should additional federal standards oversight and reporting mechanisms be considered by the department or congress to help prevent widespread operational disruptions and strengthen rail safety
oh listen i think there's a lot that can be done in this body uh when you look at rail safety um and there's the rail safety act i know which is being considered uh right now is it downstairs is this where this is happening i'd
did you add
i know the financial services uh uh uh room is but yeah i know that's being uh that's being considered right now but there's a lot we can do to continue to drive safety and uh it's it's one rail is one of these things that you can forget about if you if you um if you don't uh work in it or you don't have rail close to you but it's a it's it's critical whether it's shipping or rail the country doesn't work um uh without these uh important modes of transportation so um i'm interested to see what the the committee does and um how they consider the rail safety act
certainly appreciate
but lot of good things in there
certainly appreciate it thank you keep up the great work i go back
thank you
mister quigley
thank you chairman miss secretary let's have a deal lightning round three quick questions three quick answers
then we're done
i'll be yeah uh you i'll write you a note
ok i'll get the ok
but you talked about big bang for your buck uh o'hare busiest airport
yep
um most flights transfer through there you mentioned the tower there
yep
um because that one tower is so understaffed we got a runway that's barely used and it's brand new how close are we to addressing that
so first i i can be kinda quick and not really quick because you're right it's if you've been up in the tower the i mean the airport is massive and how that airport functions is a testament to the great controllers that we have um but i i do in the request that i'm gonna make i can you have three towers um i do think that if we get a new tower um and we get better visibility i think you're gonna get better performance out of out of the airport and again as a wisconsin guy from rural wisconsin it's one of the main arteries that we travel through
and if you if you wanna go see a a packer game you gotta go through o'hare so that that's fine but you we we just respect this so we can finish
we didn't we we we didn't get to the bears this last year which was challenging for us it's been a long time yeah
more people no no i'm with you but we just gotta get it staff uh the red line
yes
extension and it it's hard for chicago us not to see that as some degree of vindictiveness of holding it back and it drives up costs and it puts risks but uh just put this in perspective big bang for your buck amtrak thirty four million rides riders a year chicago transit authority three hundred and thirty eight million it means the world to the south land extend that and and these delays make it more and more expensive can we get through this and not have to have a court order to get the money continually going through there to extend
yes yes just and and vindictive not i'm i've without even you asking me i'll will tell everyone you did ask me uh but listen i'm looking at o'hare uh i i haven't had any issue with chicago but it was
it's an idea
how they were how they were contracting and we're in a good place now money is going um flowing to the project what i would ask you i think we do all have to work together we do have to drive better safety we do need better policies in place so riders are are safe and i think that's just good government you'll get even more riders on your system
well let me just stop you for a second
yeah
this week i met with three bus drivers three bus drivers who had been involved in
yeah
crime scenes and the they were victims of this and we talked about what cta could do better so i acknowledge that but you don't help when you cut money instead let's talk about changes in policies but can you help us get more security and you know it's a lot easier to meet in the middle where we don't all yell at each other
uh hundred like hundred percent
so let's let's keep talking on that
and and there's um and i wonder if i could just quickly i've uh i don't wanna be the one that cares the most about it i think you know locally if there's a a lot of care if you if you'd if we can talk on a plan on what you'll do on safety and then what you gonna need me to come on the back-end and help you with
yeah
i'm i'm all in i don't i don't wanna fight on anything
yeah and we're on a path below where we're actually merging metra pace cta functions and you know we'll get there and they're gonna have a security force so that's part of me in the middle to keep us on track the interchange everything being biggest and best there interstate two ninety four and interstate two ninety eighty eight this matters to the whole country cause all the freight runs through this uh largest freight corridor in the united states uh and obviously the improvements that are necessary there uh this funding has not been obligated yet and the delays are impacting idot's ability to move forward with phase two of the project so can you follow uh for my friends in indiana and ohio and uh iowa and wisconsin this is where this is where everybody goes through so uh if you don't have it now if you could get back to us
what what was what what was that again what's the what what's the
on how we can get it it's the interstate two ninety four and interstate two ninety eighty eight in the chicago region the most congested freight interchange in the united states according to the american transport research institute idoc was awarded a ninety five point six federal mega contract in twenty twenty four for the uh interchange project Uh, so you could look into that.
OK, I have a list of all the I will cuz I have all the list of of of grants that um have not gone yet.
OK.
And I don't have that one on, so I'd I'd welcome
Very good.
that follow-up.
Let us know and we return the time.
We'll work through team. That was that was rapid fire.
Thank you, Mister Strong.
Thank you, Chairman Womack, uh, Ranking Member Cliburn. Uh, Mister Secretary, I congratulate you, uh, I noticed we had Chairman uh, Cole here, Chairman Rogers. you remember, Delora, I mean, uh, you bring all the heavy weights in here. Everybody likes to see the secretary of transportation.
Very nice.
And, uh, I think everybody's been, uh, very good on this. I think we ought all get extra, uh, project for each one of us, but, uh, that's just my opinion. Secretary Duffy, uh, thank you for being here today. It's, uh, good to see you again. Also glad to see, uh, members of your staff that have joined us today. I know it's a hard job what they do. I appreciate your commitment to the American people in making the effort to see America's Transportation Industry firsthand, meeting with civil servants and specialists to keep this country running. I wanna um um I would be proud to host you in Rocket City, USA, uh Alabama's fifth congressional district. Feel free to bring the wife and kids. We'll take you to space camp and the US Space and Rocket Center, and I know you'll have a great time there. Uh you start looking at the district uh the work building up to our nation's infrastructure modernization and aviation systems and ensuring federal dollars. uh deliver real results for taxpayers. My district in North Alabama is home to Redstone, Arstal where more than forty five thousand people commute through the the gates every day, making it the single largest employment site in the state of Alabama. Secretary Duffy, before um thousands of Redstone civil servants, contractors and service members can get on this base to carry out those critical missions many face severe traffic congestion and infrastructure constraints. surrounding the installation. These transportation bottlenecks do more than create uh computer frustration. They affect operational efficiency and create vulnerability around facilities essential to our national security. My district has seen firsthand how transportation investment directly affect economic growth innovation and national security. I'd like to thank Chairman Womack for including three hundred and fifty million in the build grant funding for direct investment. in high growth areas including the Huntsville metropolitan area. I served twenty-six years in local government, uh, and I'm just telling you I saw firsthand what these grants can do in local government. Uh, serving as the Chairman of the Madison County Commission, at that time the third largest county in the state of Alabama and now the second largest county. As the department evaluates build discretionary grant applications for project, projects like road widening, congestion relief, and capacity improvements, how will you implement target investments in high growth areas like Huntsville? And are you taking into account factors such as proximity to key national security assets in high growth areas?
So, first off, I I had I had NASA for a great four months and I was gonna go to take my kids to space camp, and I never did. Um, probably one of my regrets, and I could have come down and seen um your your district. I think um I mentioned this before, but the the country is changing and we have to try to meet the needs of the the the growth areas and um i and i'd like to come down cause nothing um you don't you don't get the same perspective when you talk about it versus when you actually come and see it but i have heard the stories about the congestion um that you have in your district um and how challenging it is and uh men and women are who are providing great service to our country are having challenges uh getting to and from work um and but that's that's we don't have and and you don't give me an endless amount of money and so uh figuring out what the right priorities are and what those bottlenecks are is what we work through um and um we're trying to use public private partnerships for some of them where it can work to to maximize our dollars or loan capacity uh to to build more can i make can i make one pitch with i know you do have a minute left but we if there's a way that we can all work together to everyone has projects that they want done if we could permit them faster we're gonna spend less money and that doesn't mean permit just say yes there might be a there might be issues when in with an environmental review that we just don't do a project but they can't take four or five and if we can do that better we can build so much more when forty percent of a project can go to the permitting process versus turn in dirt i can get so much more done um and that's a bipartisan thing we have to do together and i hope we we we would and still be responsive to the environment but also have the money to build in all these places which i think is important
i totally agree and another thing that i think that uh should be taken into account the states and local government need to get skin in the ball game if it's a number one priority in their area they've gotta find a way to bring dollars to the table and i think that ought to be given uh consideration when you do it uh mister chairman uh yield back
thank you
that's always helpful when when the states will give some money and put some skin in the game it's always helpful for us
mr. Aguilar
thank you chairman wilmack and rink and member Clyburn and thank you mr secretary for being uh back here before us today thank you mr. secretary i was disappointed to see the fy twenty seven uh pbr uh lack of critical funding for the la olympic and paralympic games which will be held uh in southern california where mrs. torres and i represent president trump touted the games at the state of the union this year and don't worry i stood up and clapped uh when he mentioned it i know you guys i know you guys thank you for that Uh, so you can roll the tape, I had a decent seat. Uh, and you yourself have called these America's games, uh, yet the budget request doesn't reflect that enthusiasm. For historical context, a Republican-controlled Congress provided two point one billion dollars in inflation-adjusted numbers for the two thousand two Salt Lake City winter games. While I was glad to see the T HUD bill we marked up this morning included eight hundred and seventy-five, million dollars uh for LA twenty eight uh thank you chairman Womack it's an improvement from last year uh despite the offset that we have concerns about it still falls short of what's needed to showcase our country on the world stage uh mister strong talked about local uh impact and local skin in the game uh the funding uh that we have proposed uh pales in comparison to the seventeen billion dollars our regional stakeholders have already invested in their own funds Uh, so, uh, we have that skin in the game. I wanted to ask a few specific questions. Uh, first, will you and the administration commit to supporting LA twenty eight with the similar federal backing that US uh hosted games have received in the past?
So, obviously every community is different and all the needs are different. But to your question, I think is, do you, are you gonna lean in and support the Olympics in LA? And the answer to that is yes. I was actually though
You know they're in twenty eight, right? You know they're coming up.
Do yes. they're coming up and i know that the the the the group from LA was here today
ok
i wanted to meet um and our team meets quite a bit with them i'm here with you so i didn't meet with them but uh yeah no i i we wanna listen this is not LA it is but it's it's America like we're showcasing America in um and i think this is the point you're making as well beyond the security component of the olympics which is the biggest part of it the second biggest thing is transportation and making sure we don't i don't want you to have gridlock that's reflects poorly on all of us i want i want a seamless system we have to work with lax we have to you know i think it is it archer is gonna do the evitals but making sure we have the the amount of money necessary for transit bringing buses and bringing drivers and having mechanics and to to make the flow happen i i commit to working with you to make that happen and with this committee cause it this reflects on all of us
to what level is dot coordinating working you just mentioned obviously the two big components are the transportation and buses and and the homeland side uh on the security um so what efforts are underway to to to work closely between those two agencies
so our our us and homeland
yeah you and homeland
uh there's a there
with regional stakeholders and and transit operators obviously too
there's a there's a task force it's all working together with a different um uh aspects of the federal government with the olympics um but then we also specifically meet with the olympics uh and what we use our role is technical assistance for the most part they're on the ground um telling us their needs what their thought process is on on the routes and the plan and what streets are open what's what's closed and we provide assistance in how they're thinking through they're gonna operate the transit system for the games
and do you feel
you make the both you got the you got both the paralympics as well right after it
yeah exactly yeah i mentioned the paralympics same same question
yeah you did
um uh and and your commitment is to push whatever whatever resources this committee comes up with uh whatever that top line number is your commitment is to get that out the door in advance realizing eh you know this is this is coming up i mean this isn't just you know planning money out in the future and based on where we have been historically we are we are behind
do i'll do i'll shake hands with you if you want and i commit to giving my out
you already offered your text mail your you know press the text and nobody i'll tell you to be honest nobody on this side has your has your number to text so it's very kind of you to offer but
ok i'll just i'll just just just for just for clarity i get more texts from democrats than my friends on the republican side of the aisle on projects so i'll i don't get texts from democrats
just nobody on this committee so that's fine i mean look you know congress and this gets a little friend group sometimes and maybe
i'll shouldn't maybe that's good but but that no i don't get texts i don't get texts
eh yeah exactly
right but i i uh why would i text you back though that's the problem
i don't i don't
you're not having your number two
i don't i don't know my
but no i i came into i came into working with you and i i'll get the money out and i want these games and as you you i think you quoted the president he he also recognizes that we need to increase that he's in office when these games go off we want to showcase the country and just even with i mean you have big fifa games uh coming as well which i think if i can make it out i wanna come to the games on the twelfth is it the twelfth
uh i
in l. a. i don't know
i'm gonna be here so i don't know
um um it's a friday but anyway i we we've sent money there too to all the different communities that you all you gave us a hundred million dollars and we've divvied that up uh based on all all the number of games each of the communities have and i think you had nine million dollars in l. a. for the games
i think that's right
for transit
You know, we have to make these, you know, games work, as you mentioned, I appreciate you, you know, uh, we agree, these are America's games.
Yeah.
Um, we want wanna make sure that uh, they're adequately resourced and we get the money out the door. So, appreciate it.
I'll give you my, if you stick around I'll give you my number.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Mr. Siskamani, bring us home.
Mr. Siskamani.
Thank you, Chairman. Secretary, good to see you.
Good to see you too.
Thank you for being here. I know you know Arizona well. We'll love to have you back uh, where your schedule permits. There's some great things to see that I wanna show you there. But the first one that I wanna talk about is bus safety. And I think you, you know, it was briefly touched on a second ago. Um, growing up in in Tucson, my my dad was a bus driver, so he drove buses for first for the school district and then he drove buses for the city for for SunTran. So ensuring that those behind the wheel of a bus, um, full of people feel safe and secure is a top priority of mine for the bus drivers themselves but also for the the the people that they're carrying in the bus. Since twenty twenty the city of Tucson has operated under a no fares on buses. And uh this has led to an increase in assaults on bus drivers, a tremendous increase actually. I wanna give you a few headlines here of examples of what I'm talking about. In July of twenty twenty two this is the headline, female suntran driver assaulted at Tohono O'odham bus terminal. On June twenty eighth of twenty twenty five this was the headline, suntran bus driver assaulted by a knife wielding man. On September of uh September ninth of twenty twenty five, bus driver assaulted as a suspect threw rocks at the driver. The suspect got off the bus and jumped onto another bus in the same direction. These are just a few examples, uh we're seeing hundreds of disturbing reports like this all over the country, not just in Tucson. Can you update us on your agency's efforts to stop cities like the city of Tucson, from putting our transit operators in harm's way?
first i i was a bus driver myself um that's where i first got my commercial driver's license um a seven months uh so no i take i take your point uh seriously what i i i i don't have a lot of authority right but to your point um one of the greatest success stories has been in san francisco they stopped a ferry evasion on their subway and crime plummeted i'm there there's a correlation if you just open if you open the systems up um you start to see more crime and the criminal element come in and uh i can't i can't leverage the the city to do the right thing but hopefully the community would step up and look at the data and you know push their leaders to to to stop some of the uh the policies that are not helping but inhibiting safety
well this is definitely no question uh a majority responsibility on the or actually all responsibility on the local uh city council and and mayor and decisions there to make these fairs basically free and and and having the consequences that i just talked about i do wanna explore different ways you mentioned the word leverage different ways that we can at a at a at a federal level also uh try to impact this because it's it's a safety issue as you mentioned i mean you have you had city of holder my my dad was as well before he retired this is a serious issue and it's getting worse so i i wanna i do wanna explore ways that we can probably look at something there that we that we could do we we have to i have to explore every avenue when uh when my the the the city where i live in and the major city in my district is not it's not gonna go the right direction uh we we need help
uh i i appreciate you bringing up the safety on on our on our buses and our just the the transit system that's too much i think our country deserves better our people deserve better
absolutely
and it takes leadership and it's hard to we don't wanna do the leadership that's not federal leadership that's the communities need to lean in and serve people better and we have to say this is this is for people moving from point a to point b and if we have a homelessness problem well transit's not the place let's deal with homelessness but let's not put them on transit let's not put criminals on transit we have to reserve that for the good people who pay for it that that need it
i i i would take the bus um when i was a kid uh to and from one of the first high school that i attended after football practice and you know late in the evening i i you know that that's not something that kids do anymore, that you just can't you're not you're not safe in that.
No.
Up just a minute left uh I'm gonna drop this question real quick, you already kinda talked about this the terminal radar approach control facility, TRACON on Davis Mountain Air Force Base. Um I've heard directly from the Air Force traffic controllers working there about the deterioration of the tower along with unsafe outdated work equipment. Um would ADOT be willing to look into the infrastructure needs here uh of of what we were seeing on the on the air traffic control look overall
i would i would welcome that just the the needs are so great um and we just we're we're getting out one point seven billion dollars that we had that that money is moving uh some of the towers are not ready to to take it but um i'd be happy to work with you but there's a huge need that's gonna you guys gonna have to deal with in the out years here and everybody has by the way customer clabourine is getting money for his airport
the air traffic controllers work hard and i think this is the one of the most bipartisan issues we'll find we all need this and uh we'll be glad to work with you on that.
Hope so.
Mr. Chairman, I yield back two seconds.
American safety.
Thank you, Mister Siskamani, and uh that completes our round of questions. I'm going to uh before I close yield to my friend, the ranking member, for any closing comments he'd like to make. Jim.
Well, thank you very much, Mr. Chairman, and thank you, uh, Mr. Secretary, for being here. You know, I um, I'm a great level of history. Uh, I i'm not proud of all of our history
oh my
uh but i love uh all of it in south carolina we have uh three national heritage corridors uh the south mountain national heritage corridor the garaguchi heritage corridor uh that's the low country uh and we have the uh uh what we call the southern campaign heritage corridor. That's a selling campaign of the revolutionary war. I don't want you all to mistake uh our reputation for having started the civil war. Uh, I um, I studied the civil war, but I don't, uh, I'm not proud of that heritage. So you're invited uh to South Carolina because all these heritage corridors uh are are in South Carolina, though I don't know what congressional district they're in in for another week or so. Uh, but i would love to see a tour uh like you've conducted to bring attention to the real history of this country uh i think if you consider uh a trip like that to uh one of all three of these heritage quarters it would be welcome in south carolina and i think it would highlight a history uh that all of us ought to grow uh to be proud of uh now we also have three national parks um you can come and go to the national parks uh all six of these uh these three parks these three heritage gardens all creations of yours truly and so i would like to have you come down and bring some attention to it i think your road trip will do that for us
what's i don't want
we're told they're doing that sometimes between now and november
congressman can i just quickly thirty seconds
sure
um uh i'm not i i can't tell you what and where the road trip went but they could have gone to charleston and they could have gone to the uh uh the the the marina there that goes from the mountains all the way down through um into the ocean and it's uh it's a it's a beautiful place and i'll i'll take you up on your invitation and you but just if i can make one last point you're the infrastructure needs of south carolina you mentioned the growth of south carolina Uh, it's per capita, not total growth, but per capita growth. It's it's huge. And uh, there's there's real needs of of uh roads and even evacuation routes out in South Carolina.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Not sure where all the roadshow went. Um, but if in fact it didn't go certain places where you've been invited and the roadshow comes back, understand you will be welcomed with open arms and without any criticism from this panel.
There's There's there's no season two, I guarantee you that. There's
We appreciate you.
Thank you. Thank you very much.
Thank you very much. Small Walmart brand Walmart.
Yeah. Yeah, you will be most welcome in uh the great Northwest Arkansas. The chair detects that we have a few interns that are in the audience here today, uh maximizing their opportunity to see government in action from a very practical standpoint. Mr. Secretary, if you would when this is over today, if you would stay for just a moment, give these kids an opportunity to engage you in conversation, maybe take a picture.
I would love that.
It'd be wonderful. Our time is concluded. Uh, I wanna thank everybody for being here today. There may be some members who have remaining questions that they need um uh answered, and if that's the case, uh submit those questions for the record, uh please do so promptly. Secretary Duffy, again thank you for your time. It's an honor and a privilege to have you here.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Morning digest
Start every morning briefed on yesterday’s hearings
A free weekday email covering yesterday’s hearings and transcripts newly unlocked in the archive.



