Senate seal

Senate · Hearing transcript

Nominations of Kavoukjian, Steel, Dahl, Brat and Wendt to State Dept

Wednesday, May 20, 2026

Summary

  • The committee heard testimony Wednesday from five nominees for ambassador posts and State Department legal adviser without taking a vote.
  • Kavookjan pledged to protect Americans, deepen defense and energy ties with Norway, and visit Kirkenes immediately to signal Arctic priorities.
  • Chris Van Hollen pressed Dahl on whether the Iran blockade constitutes war, but Dahl declined to give a yes-or-no legal answer.
  • Sen. Lummis (R-WY) praised the nominee's qualifications while Jeanne Shaheen criticized prolonged vacancies and administration disregard for appropriated foreign aid funds.
  • The record remains open through May 21 for written questions before the committee votes on advancing the five nominations to Senate floor.

Morning digest

Get hearings like this in your inbox

Free weekday email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Hearing Details

Witnesses

Members Who Spoke

View on Congress.gov

Transcript

Sen. Risch (ID)24:29 – 25:00

United States Senate Foreign Relations Committee will come to order. Uh today we have a uh nominations hearing with uh five nominees uh here before us. We have um ordinarily uh I what I would do is make an opening statement and then yield to the ranking member, but we have two introductions and I know Senator Lummis has other things to do so We'll let you do the introductions, then we'll move to uh a statement from uh th- myself and the ranking member and then we'll hear from the nominees but uh Senator Lummis, let's start with you.

Sen. Lummis (WY)25:01 – 26:09

Well, thank you very much, Mister Chairman. It's an honor to be uh with this distinguished panel of senators, and it's also an honor to be at the table with this distinguished uh man and gentle women who are willing to serve our country in the capacity of ad- uh ambassadors and so thanks so much for um uh allowing me to introduce uh my friend, the Honorable Doctor David Bratt, President Trump's nominee to serve as US Ambassador to the Commonwealth of Australia. Doctor Bratt served Virginia's seventh district in the US House of Representatives for two terms from twenty fourteen to twenty eighteen. That's where we got to know each other when we served together in the house. Uh it was uh uh a wonderful experience and I can tell you firsthand that he's a man of extraordinary intellect deep conviction and unshakable integrity. So David's path to public service is one that few could replicate. He has a foundation in theology, you have a master's degree from in theology from Princeton,

David Brat (Witness)26:09 – 26:10

Seminary seminary, yep.

Sen. Lummis (WY)26:09 – 29:21

correct? Princeton seminary, uh a PHD in economics, you know you could probably be ambassador to somewhere who spoke Hebrew or Greek or Latin and you're going to an American speaking, I'm in an English speaking country, but that's uh beside the point. Um he has a PHD in economics and years spent in the classroom as a professor teaching economics and ethics, not as separate disciplines, but as deeply connected ones. Dave brings a rare depth of experience to everything he does, his background academia, finance, and public service has shaped his belief that economic questions are fundamentally moral questions, and that principled faith-grounded thinking leads to better outcomes for people and nations alike. He brought that same conviction to Congress. Dave entered public service because he believed our country needs voices, willing to speak hard truths, about fiscal responsibility, the foundations that made America great, and the importance of ethics in government, he was never one to shy away from a difficult vote. And those who served with him will tell you that when Dave makes a promise, he keeps it. That is a rare quality in any arena, and it is exactly the quality you want representing the United States abroad. Today Dave serves in senior leadership at Liberty University, where he continues to champion the idea of good economics and good values are inseparable. In his current role, he oversees business relations on a global scale, traveling internationally, cultivating relationships with current and former world leaders, and bringing top executives and national and international figures together for meaningful dialogue. That will serve both of our countries well. uh when you uh take up residence in Australia. Dave lives by example and believes that a clear conception of ethical living, grounded in faith, produces better leaders, better citizens and a better world. He has carried that world view through every chapter of his career, and I have no doubt he will carry it with the same passion and integrity to Canberra. His rare combination of economic expertise, global relationship building and principal leadership will serve America well. Australia is one of our trusted and enduring allies. The relationship between our two nations is built on shared values, shared sacrifice, of which they are very proud, by the way, and a shared vision for a free and prosperous Indo-Pacific. De Brat, Economist, Educator, Man of Faith, and my former colleague is precisely the kind of ambassador who will strengthen that bond. I am very proud to introduce him to this committee and honored to call him my friend. Thank you, Mister Chairman, I yield back.

Sen. Risch (ID)29:22 – 29:33

Thank you, Senator Lummis. We appreciate that and we know you have another commitment, so you're welcome to stay or uh uh go about your business as you're required to do here. So thank you so much. We appreciate that.

Sen. Lummis (WY)29:33 – 29:33

Thank you.

Sen. Risch (ID)29:33 – 29:36

Senator Curtis, I understand you have uh some reports.

Sen. Curtis (UT)29:35 – 32:16

I do. Yeah, thank you uh, Mr. Chairman. Uh, Madam Ranking Member, so pleased today. Uh, and I can't tell you how pleased I was when on April thirteenth President Trump nominated Michelle Steele to serve as Ambassador to the to uh Republic of Korea. Michelle and I had the pleasure of serving together in the House. And I'll share a little bit of her bio with you, but before I do that, I will just tell you If character matters to you, if hard work matters to you, if competency matters to you, if uh dedication matters to you, this is the right person uh for that position in in South Korea. Uh Miss Michelle Park Steel is one of the first Korean American women elected to the US House of Representatives where she served two terms representing Calif- California's forty-eighth and forty-fifth district. While in Congress, Miss Steel fought for California families and small businesses, served on the influential House Ways and Means Committee, and worked on the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, Education and Labor, focusing on issues ranging from tax reform to US-China policy. After fleeing North Korea during the Korean War, Ms. Steele's parents met and built a life in South Korea before moving to Japan where Michelle studied at the Japan Women's University. Her father encouraged her at a young age to move to the United States. Motivated by the challenges her mother faced as a small business owner, navigated tax laws and state regulations, Miss Still ran for and won a seat on the State Board of Equalization, the nation's only elected tax board, where she represented over nine million constituents. She later served as supervisor and chairwoman of the Orange County Board of Supervisors. Miss Still's long record of achievement in elected positions and extensive service as a public service leader at a local and national levels is coupled with her overseas experience and that I'll make sure well qualified to serve as Ambassador to the Republic of Korea. Miss still earned a Bachelor of Science Business Administration from Pepperdine University and an Executive Master of Business Administration from the University of Southern California. Now all that said, uh although uh she is trilingual, including fluency in Korean and Japanese, I did discover one small imperfection during our trip to Taiwan. She does not speak Mandarin. People there naturally assumed that if they wanted to talk to me, the Caucasian guy, they first needed to go through Michelle. They would begin speaking to her in Mandarin only to look surprised when the white guy turned out to be the translator. I am so proud to introduce and support Miss Still, and I hope uh you find her equally as qualified as I do. Thank you.

Sen. Risch (ID)32:18 – 36:16

Well, uh thank you uh so much uh Senator Curtis. We uh we sincerely appreciate that. Um I have a few remarks to make and then I'm gonna turn it over to the ranking member, and then we'll hear from each of you. So uh first of all I wanna thank all of you uh for being here and for being willing to serve, and especially we'd like to thank your families. Uh we know that on these kind of uh things uh the families are as much a part of the service as you are, uh they sacrifice as much as you do, and um in many instances even more than you do, so we really appreciate uh uh the families. Uh so let's start uh a missed deal. In many ways uh South Korea has been a model ally for the United States. Uh as you know better than most, our economic and security relationship with Korea is incredibly important. President Lee has made commitments up uh to up Korea's uh defense spending and to deepen relations with the United States and with Japan. But we also need to up our cooperation in shipbuilding, semiconductors, artificial intelligence and nuclear energy, all critical sectors to ensure uh the US and our partners uh remain at the forefront of tech competition. Today I'd like to hear from you on your priorities for implementing our trade and investment framework with Korea, if confirmed in your and if confirmed, and your views on how we can address the regional threats uh from China and North Korea. Uh, Mister Kabukjan, As you know, Norway uh is a key US ally in Europe uh and the High North. It's uh bordered with Russia as well as its sovereignty over uh Svalbard and the long Arctic coast make it a key partner in countering Russian and Chinese malign activities in the North Atlantic. Norway is also key to building a European energy mix that is independent and secure from Russian interference. We need to work together to advance this goal and protect critical infrastructure. I look forward to hearing how you would uh work with Norway to advance these key priorities. Mister Wendt, the United States uh partnership uh with Albania has benefited from significant growth in recent years and now more than ever. Albania is an important NATO ally, helping provide stability in the Western Balkans and standing up to Russian influence. It is very important for the US to continue its support of Albania's implementation of government and economic reforms they have undertaken. which will in turn increase opportunities for greater cooperation. I look forward to hearing your thoughts on these issues. Mister Dahl, I do not envy the task before you. The legal advisor is integral to the planning and execution of our most complex and consequential foreign policy decisions. Whether it is the military, economic, or gray zone threats posed by Rus- China and Russia, complex international uh treaty negotiations, or protecting our most precious resource, American citizens abroad, you will be uniquely poised to inform the President and the Secretary on extremely consequential issues. This job will certainly keep your hands full, but if confirmed, I trust you will work uh with this committee to ensure our national security is protected. And finally, Mister Brat, Australia is one of our most important partners in countering China's influence in the Indo-Pacific. If confirmed, you will oversee a historic transformation of our alliance with Australia as we step up our diplomatic, economic and security cooperation through AUKUS and other initiatives. In this role, I hope you will also push our friends to fully implement their new investment screening and foreign influence laws, to counter malign Chinese influence and assist them as they seek to counter the rise of anti-semitism that we've seen in Australia and for that matter, around the world. Thank you again to the nominees and to the families, and with that turn uh the podium over to the ranking member, Senator Shaheen.

Sen. Shaheen (NH)36:16 – 38:30

Thank you, Mister Chairman, and welcome to all of our nominees today. Um thank you for your willingness to think about continuing to serve this country, and welcome to all of your family and supporters who are here this morning. Last year at our nomination hearing for the legal advisor to the State Department, Mister Dahl, I asked him whether he would commit to following the law. And he actually struggled to answer. It was an yes or no question, but he couldn't give me a yes answer. Over the last year, that attitude toward the law, including refusing to spend funds that Congress has appropriated, has had real consequences. We've seen the termination of global health programs, and now we're seeing an Ebola outbreak in Africa that has real implications for countries around the world. We've seen family planning commodities that have been left to expire in warehouses instead of reaching women and families who need them. Foreign assistance cuts have weakened our ability to stand with Ukraine against Russia. And none of that makes us safer or more secure. Mister Dolle, if confirmed as the State Department's next Legal Advisor, I hope you will ensure that the administration follows the law. Because, as we know, the law is not optional. Mister Brat, you've been nominated to be the US Ambassador to Australia. Um, like the Chairman, I think Australia is a vital ally, particularly on AUKUS. It's gonna be um critical to US Ambassador to help encourage that AUKUS continues to move forward. It's also important for critical minerals, for countering Chinese coercion in the Indo-Pacific. And the administration's prolonged review of AUKUS has created uncertainty that I think has really been unnecessary at a critical time in the region. It took more than a year for the administration to nominate someone to this post, and I'm glad that they finally have. I'm delighted because it's delays like that that weaken American credibility with our allies. Mister, is it Kvookian?

Kavookjan38:32 – 38:33

Kvook John.

Sen. Shaheen (NH)38:34 – 38:34

Kvook John.

Kavookjan38:34 – 38:36

But I'm not fussy, Senator.

Sen. Risch (ID)38:37 – 38:39

Not when you're at this can be here.

Sen. Shaheen (NH)38:41 – 38:47

Now, are you of Armenian descent, because in New Hampshire we have a lot of Armenians whose last name ends in the same way.

Kavookjan38:47 – 38:55

Yes, uh, you'll hear about this in my opening statement, I'm Armenian on my father's side and Norwegian on my mother's side.

Sen. Risch (ID)38:56 – 38:56

Hmm.

Sen. Shaheen (NH)38:56 – 42:04

Well, we're delighted that you're gonna have a chance to go back and uh See Norway firsthand. Um, when our embassy in Oslo was targeted in a terrorist attack in March, we had no US ambassador on the ground. And just as key posts across the Middle East remained vacant following Iran's recent retaliatory attacks, it's critical that we have ambassadors in US posts around the world. Norway is on the front lines of growing Russian activity and sabotage efforts in the Baltics and the North Sea and in the Arctic. If confirmed, I hope you will work closely with our Norwegian allies to strengthen NATO's presence in the Arctic and to counter Russian aggression. The United States needs to show up and lead in moments like these. Mister Wendt, you've been nominated to serve as ambassador to Albania. And again, as the chairman said, Albania is one of our closest partners in the Western Balkans and a NATO ally, and it has really stood with us in so many ways. It's also stood with Ukraine and supported sanctions on Russia. If confirmed, you will be the first U. S. Ambassador to Albania in three years. At a consequential moment for the region, diplomatic leadership matters. Miss Steele, you've been nominated to serve as Ambassador to South Korea. Um, Senator Curtis talked about your trip with him to Taiwan, but um, he and I And Senator Rosen from this committee recently traveled there with a bipartisan delegation. And across Asia we heard the same message repeatedly. They want to see the United States stand by its allies. That's why I was troubled when I heard the President suggest that arms sales to Taiwan might actually be an open item to negotiate with with China. I think Taiwan's security is not a bargaining chip it's central to deterrence in the Indo-Pacific. and allies like South Korea are watching closely to see whether American commitments remain firm. That matters not only for our security alliances, but for our economic partnerships as well. If confirmed, I hope you will work to strengthen our alliance with Seoul and reinforce deterrence in the region. Let me conclude by highlighting that last week, more than two hundred and fifty foreign service officers were separated from the Department of State. These are professionals with deep expertise in whom the United States has invested time and resources. I am very distressed that we are hollowing out America's diplomatic core and at the time when America's leadership needs to remain strong in the world, when growing threats around the world could move us in the wrong direction. So, again, I appreciate all of you being here this morning, your willingness to be nominated and considered for these critical posts. Thank you, Mister Chairman.

Sen. Risch (ID)42:05 – 42:29

Thank you, Senator Shaheen. Uh, we'll now hear from the nominees. Um, we'd like you to keep it to about five minutes. Uh, if you have uh, more lengthy remarks than that, we're more than happy to have those included in the record. So, uh, give us all you want. Just keep your remarks to about five minutes if you would. We appreciate it. So, um, Mister Brat, we'll start with you. Thank you very much. Uh, Chairman Risch, Ranking Member,

Sen. Shaheen (NH)42:28 – 42:29

Um, you wanna turn on your

Sen. Risch (ID)42:30 – 42:30

what a day.

Sen. Shaheen (NH)42:30 – 42:30

mike.

Sen. Risch (ID)42:30 – 42:31

It's been a while.

David Brat (Witness)42:33 – 46:41

Thank you very much. Uh, Chairman Risch, uh, Ranking Member Shaheen, and distinguished members of the committee, thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today. It is an honor to be nominated as United States Ambassador to the Commonwealth of Australia. President Trump and Secretary Rubio have called upon diplomats to be champions for the American people above all else. If confirmed as ambassador, I will ensure American interests and American citizens always come first. First, I want to thank President Trump for the incredible honor of representing him and the United States in Australia. Second, I want to thank Secretary Rubio for the incredible team sitting all around us that has shaped uh at the h- that he has shaped at the state, and for the crucial support I have received all the way through this process. It's been remarkable. Finally, I want to thank my loving wife Laura behind me for her strength and courage as we face another great journey together. I also want to say a personal hello to Australia on this big day, if confirmed. I love everything about your country. I'm a tennis fanatic. I follow your pros, the Open, and of course, the game of Prime Minister Albanese. I'm looking forward to sports diplomacy across the board. I love the Australian people I have met in life and I appreciate their decency, their wit, their sense of humor above all. As Aristotle said, true friends must pursue similar ends and similar goals, and we do. We all share the same values of life, liberty and happiness. The US, United States lost a hundred and sixty thousand of our best who gave the ultimate sacrifice in the Great Pacific Wars of World War Two. to gain a maritime foothold and ensure free navigation for the next generations. Australia has been with us every step of the way, with loyal friendship and with courage. If confirmed, I'm excited to build great friendships with you in person. Few countries are as integral to US interests as Australia as evidenced by the broad, bipartisan support for the alliance, a long-standing treaty ally, five eyes partner, AUKUS and Quad member, our partnership with Australia makes America safer, stronger and more prosperous, in the words of Secretary Rubio. Few uh our relationship with Australia under this administration is deepening. During the President's meeting last October with Prime Minister Albanese, our leaders charted a course to take the alliance to new highs. Building on that historic summit, I see opportunities to advance our priorities in three key areas. uh which the committee's already suggested this morning, critical minerals and commercial diplomacy, number two, defense cooperation and number three, partnership in the Indo-Pacific region. Uh the first priority, the critical minerals framework signed by President Trump and Prime Minister Albanese lays a solid foundation for securing these important supply chains. If confirmed, I would focus our team on fully executing this foundational agreement. Australia remains a promising market for US companies. Building on the administration's recent success in securing access for beef, US beef, I would work to ensure a level playing field for all US companies. I'd also be a steadfast champion of Australian investment into the United States, partnering with Australia's superannuation funds, uh which will go over a trillion dollars in the next ten years, to execute on plans to in- invest uh in the US. If confirmed, I would also continue to strengthen defense cooperation, including uh working with Congress to further streamline defense trade controls. Amidst China's unprecedented military build-up, the US-Australia alliance is an essential pillar of regional stability and deterrence. As the President has instructed, I would ensure the mission moves full steam ahead, including AUKUS, on AUKUS and other alliance priorities. Finally, if confirmed as Ambassador, I would expand our partnership with Australia across the Indo-Pacific, and especially in the Pacific Islands. Working with Australia to build out critical infrastructure, support private

Sen. Risch (ID)47:02 – 47:05

Thank you, Mr. Brat. We'll turn to Mr. Wendt.

David Brat (Witness)47:05 – 47:05

Thank you.

Sen. Risch (ID)47:05 – 47:06

The floor is yours.

Wendt47:09 – 51:29

Chairman Risch, Ranking Member Shahin and members of the committee, I'm honored and grateful uh to President Trump for the trust placed in me with this nomination for the position of US Ambassador to Albania. For over thirty-four years, I served the United States of America as an active duty soldier. I'd spent uh four and a half years in the infantry and thirty years uh as a green beret. That tenure included being assigned to the US State Department for two years while leading an eight country coalition as the US security coordinator for Israel and the Palestinian Authority. In that position, I operated daily as a part of the US embassy in Jerusalem, while reporting directly to the US secretary of state. Since retiring from uniformed service, I've been blessed to teach command and leadership at my graduate school alma mater, the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California. So today, my wife is overseas in Okinawa, Japan, with our US Air Force Captain, son-in-law, and with our daughter and our granddaughter to help care for another newly arrived granddaughter. Our son, a US Army first lieutenant, serving as a paratrooper in the eighty-second airborne division, is sitting behind me. He and his wife are serving the country while Fort Bragg, North Carolina. We are a family that loves the United States of America, and we are thankful for the opportunity to serve such a remarkable country. As the commander for NATO's special operations forces, Albanian special operations troopers were a part of my command, and I worked with them on the ground in Albania. In Afghanistan, I served as the deputy commander of a regional command that included Albanian troopers. I found that the Albanian Special Forces troopers exemplify the warrior spirit of the Albanian hero, Skanderbeg. And the Albanian people themselves are a proud, hard-working, and hospitable people. If confirmed, my top priorities will be to protect US citizens and advance American interests. If confirmed, at post we will utilize four lines of operation as we assess our way forward to further develop the embassy's country plan. The first line will explore ways to make America safer. Supporting Albania as they continue their fight against corruption, as well as transnational organized crime and drug trafficking linked with Latin American drug cartels will help make America and Albania safer. Second. We'll work to make Al- America more secure. These actions will also benefit Albanian security. I will work diligently to support Albania's progress towards the Hague twenty twenty five NATO summit agreement to thoughtfully increase defense spending to five percent of GDP by twenty thirty five while supporting increased US and Albanian cyber security capabilities and investigating mutually beneficial initiatives. across multiple military domains. Third will be our focus on making America more prosperous. These efforts will simultaneously benefit Albanian prosperity. As Albanians' AI, energy, infrastructure, mining, and other economic sectors grow, US businesses and investors should face level contractual and legal playing fields. Fourth will be our focus on the post itself. including a key line of effort that I call human factors, which will seek to utilize both standard and creative ways to care for the most valuable part of the post, its people, both publicly and in their professional careers, and with information they're willing to offer privately and and personally. In conclusion, if confirmed, I look forward to collaborating with the members of this committee and our partners in Albania to achieve these important goals. And I welcome any questions you may have.

Sen. Risch (ID)51:30 – 51:34

Thank you very much. Uh, Mr. we'll now turn to uh Miss Thiel.

Michelle Steel (Witness)51:36 – 53:57

Chairman, Ranking Members, and Honorable Members of the Committee. Thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today. It is honor of a lifetime to be present Trump's nominee for US Ambassador to Republic of Korea. I'm deeply grateful to President Trump and Secretary Rubio for their trust in me to serve the American people. I want to thank my family, my husband of forty-five years, Sean, my daughters, Cheyenne and Siobhan, and their husbands, Wolf, who's been deployed since March. This is second deployment. He's a Navy Lieutenant Commander. Johnny still stays in London with my fourth grandchild. My sister, Joey, and my brother-in-law, Sh- Sherman, and my actually three adorable grandchildren, Declan, Rosemary, Charlie are sitting in the back. Today, I reminded of a Korean saying. After hardship comes joy. Like so many Korean Americans, our story began in hardship. My parents fled North Korea during the Korean War. They started a family in South Korea, a place made safe and free because more than thirty-six thousand Americans gave their lives in defense of freedom. While we were living in Japan, my father encouraged me to study in the United States, which he saw as beacon of hope, freedom, and prosperity. He was right. English is my third language. And only in a country like ours could someone like me serve their community in Congress. During my two terms in Congress, I worked to strengthen our national security, preserve economic prosperity, protect American workers and businesses, and advance human rights, including on the Ways and Means Committee. If confirmed, I continued that commitment by strengthening our alliance with the Republic of Korea. For more than seven decades, the alliance between United States and the Republic of Korea has served

Sen. Risch (ID)53:53 – 53:54

Oh my goodness.

Michelle Steel (Witness)53:57 – 56:15

as the linchpin of peace, security, and prosperity in Northeast Asia. Our combined defense posture, anchored by the twenty-eight thousand five hundred members of US forces, Korea, and reinforced by America's extended nuclear deterrent remains ironclad, it is the bedrock of our alliance. President Trump opened the historic new chapter in our alliance with his twenty twenty five state visit to Gyeongju. The twenty twenty five UK ROK joint fact sheet outlined the once in a generation upgrade to our security cooperation. As part of this modernization, Seoul has pledged to expand its defense spending and to bolster our shared deterrence posture. Our governments cooperate closely to respond to the DPRK's unlawful weapons programs. It's expanding cybercrime operations and it deepening military cooperation with Russia. We are strengthening a vital trilateral partnership alongside Japan to defend the free and open in the Pacific. South Korea is one of the America's most important trading partner and a critical investor in rebuilding American industry. In twenty twenty five, we welcomed the US ROK's strategic trade investment deal, in which South Korea commits to invest three hundred fifty billion dollars in US strategic industries and reduce barriers to US exports. American companies operating in Korea deserve the same market access that Korean companies enjoy in the United States. The United States and Republic of Korea share one of the world's strongest alliances and I look forward to supporting the next phase our our great alliance. I look forward to your questions. Thank you.

Sen. Risch (ID)56:15 – 56:20

Thank you, mi- uh, Miss Steele. Uh, let's go to uh, Mr. Kavookjan.

Kavookjan56:25 – 1:00:06

Chairman Rish, Ranking Member Shaheen and members of the committee. I am honored to appear before you at the nominee for United States Ambassador to the Kingdom of Norway. I am deeply grateful to President Trump for the trust he has placed in me with this nomination. If confirmed, I pledge to serve the American people with diligence, fortitude and integrity in this important post. I also want to thank my family, my former colleagues in the CIA, my partners at White and Case, which has been my professional home for the last forty years, the nominations team at the State Department, some of whom are here today, and Senator Tom Cotton. I appreciate all of their support throughout this process. Thanks as well to my late parents, who made patriotism a core value in our home. And finally, special thanks to my wife, Jana. I would not be in this position without her. She will be our best asset in Oslo if I am confirmed. This nomination is especially meaningful to me as my mother was born in Norway, near the Lofoten Islands, in a house my great grandfather built that still stands. My Norwegian-born uncle served in the OSS during World War Two working with the Norwegian resistance. I was raised in Minnesota, home to more Americans of Norwegian ancestry than any other state and a center of Norwegian American culture. I was, believe it or not, a competitive ski jumper in my youth. I am hopeful that this background will help me build strong relationships with our Norwegian allies. It also means that if confirmed, our family will have gone from a rustic island farmhouse in a fjord north of the Arctic Circle to the ambassador's residence in Oslo in one generation. That is a quintessential American story with some Nordic nuance. If confirmed as ambassador, my top priorities will be to one, aid and protect US citizens in Norway, including our embassy staff. Two, advance American security interests by building on our long tradition of military and intelligence cooperation with Norway. Three, further strengthen our economic ties with Norway, especially in the area of critical minerals and energy. to diversify the global supply chain. And four, build closer cultural connections between the American and Norwegian people, so that the bond of trust we have forged over the last two hundred years continues into the next generation. As a founding member of NATO and the eyes and ears of the alliance in the Arctic, Norway understands its commitment to our shared security. It is meeting NATO's enhanced defense spending targets. Indeed, it is now the first country in the history of the alliance to spend more per capita on defense than the United States. Many of its upgraded systems are purchased from the United States. Norway's strategic location, its military capabilities and its experience operating in extreme cold weather make it an indispensable security partner. If confirmed, I will work to further strengthen cooperation with Norway on defense issues with special attention to Russian and Chinese activities in the Arctic that are opposed to our interests. National security is inextricably linked to economic strength. I will therefore have confirmed work to increase business ties and trade between our two countries, especially in critical areas like rare earth elements. Norway's recent joining of the PAK silica initiative is an important step in ensuring US access to these resources. Norway also has a thriving energy sector that plays a vital role in global energy security supplying thirty percent of Europe's oil and natural gas and reducing reliance on more problematic producers. Norway has the world's largest sovereign wealth fund valued at two trillion dollars, roughly half of which is invested in the US.

Sen. Risch (ID)1:00:06 – 1:00:06

Mm.

Kavookjan1:00:07 – 1:01:40

I would welcome the opportunity to encourage more direct investment by Norwegian companies in the United States to create American jobs and to reduce trade barriers so American firms can compete fairly in the Norwegian market. Finally, if confirmed, I will work tirelessly to promote cross- to promote cross-cultural initiatives that bring the Norwegian and American people closer together. Norwegian immigrants have made enormous contributions to the United States, especially in the upper Midwest. Roughly five million Americans have Norwegian ancestry. But as new generations grow more distant from their immigrant past, we must work to ensure the bond between our two great peoples remains strong. For example, if confirmed, I will seek to arrange for a Minnesota Vikings football game to be played in Oslo. Nothing could be more effective in inspiring Norwegian Americans to visit their ancestral homeland. and form new ties with their American, with their Norwegian cousins. I want to conclude with a quote from our former Secretary of State, George Shultz, on the most important lesson he learned from his many years on the world stage. Quote, " Trust is the coin of the realm. When trust was in the room, good things happened. Everything else is details." Unquote. Our relationship with Norway is built on a foundation of trust. That trust comes from a long history of working together, shared values, shared interests and candor. If confirmed, I will continue that tradition of trust. With that foundation, I am confident that, as Secretary Shultz said, good things will happen. Thank you for your consideration. I welcome any questions you may have.

Sen. Risch (ID)1:01:40 – 1:01:44

Thank you, Mr. Kovach, and we're gonna move now to Mr. Dahl.

Dahl1:01:45 – 1:02:37

Chairman Rish, Ranking Member Shahin, and distinguished members of the committee. It's the privilege of a lifetime to appear today as the President's nominee to be the Legal Advisor to the Department of State. I want to thank President Trump and Secretary Rubio for their confidence in me. I also want to thank my wife, who has been so supportive over my career and who is here today, my wife Jessica, along with our children, Elias, uh Vivienne and London, my twin brothers here, along with my parents, and my mother and father-in-law are also here. I am deeply indebted to the the sacrifices and support that they have shown. I also want to thank the team at the department who has helped me prepare for this opportunity. The prospect of working with such superb and dedicated people has demonstrated a key facet of why this position is so desirable. Years ago I came to Washington DC from Kansas where both my wife and I were raised,

Sen. Risch (ID)1:02:37 – 1:02:37

Yeah.

Dahl1:02:38 – 1:02:40

wanting to pursue a career in the government.

Sen. Risch (ID)1:02:39 – 1:02:40

Yeah.

Dahl1:02:41 – 1:05:27

Interested in international relations, in early September two thousand one I submitted an application for a national security education program scholarship to study Turkish in Istanbul, which itself entailed an obligation to work for the government. Little did any of us know how the events of that month would reshape our lives. I was eventually granted the chance to pursue a master's in Arabic and modern Middle Eastern studies and subsequently filled a role at the Treasury attache's office at the US embassy in Baghdad. I later returned to Treasury in DC and worked on the inter-agency group focused on Afghanistan before heading to law school. I share these experiences because they formed my impressions of the fundamental role of the rule of law, incredible institutions in ensuring pathways to stable and prosperous coexistence. In short, they highlighted the centrality of communal trust to the success of any public endeavor. A thriving society rests on predictable legal norms, and when it acts as a single community externally, it must do so with conviction and credibility. The legal advisor's office is core to those principles and accomplishes its functions across an array of complex, and intersecting legal regimes. Paramount, of course, is the delivery of accurate and objective legal advice to the secretary and to the department more broadly. It has a particularly distinct role, moreover, in advising on and articulating the meaning of international law. That law is not just a set of rules, but a framework for communicating our principles, expectations and aspirations to the global community. The department then grants to the legal advisor in supporting the secretary, a legal mouthpiece for conveying our values abroad and engaging in dialogue about those values. My legal career spanning both government and private practice informs how I understand the obligations of the legal advisor's office and the wide array of talents and skills that the office possesses. I have spent years advising clients on a variety of crisis management, international negotiations, litigation, governance, and operational strategy issues. That experience also provides signals on how the office can continue to engage effectively with the various communities of interest, with Congress, across the executive branch, with the American public, and with the world community. I am incredibly grateful to be considered by this committee, and if confirmed would be deeply honored to serve. But for now I recognize we have much to discuss, and I look forward to that engagement.

Sen. Risch (ID)1:05:29 – 1:07:47

Thank you, uh, Mister Dahl. We'll now proceed to a uh round of questions, uh five minutes for each member here, and I'm gonna start with myself. Um, Miss Thiel, uh y- you know, uh I think most everybody on this committee is has gone to Korea. and stood on the dmz and looked one direction and then the other direction and you can't help but think about what happened there uh in korea on a korean peninsula after world war two as the world was was readjusting itself to a new world order and people were deciding what kind of government they're gonna have on the one side you got this autocracy uh that is uh incredibly closed society uh with no rule of law and uh an incredibly uh difficult standard of living uh and uh in a communist country. On the other side you have a robust democracy uh and uh people have a high standard of living and um uh i and obviously it's a capitalist free market system. And you look at those two and and you think how could any human being stand here and look at this and not easily see uh which way is better. Um uh it it to me that was uh that that is just uh staggera and here you had a really monolithic population of people who occupied the peninsula all one country, all one uh one race, one group of people, and yet one went one way and one went the other and and and half of them living a horrible life right now and the other really living a a life that is much different than here in America as I traveled around around South Korea. So um i in any event, the thing that struck me is over the years back, they each each country had a reunification department, if you would. And now that's gone. Uh each of them have disbanded that and it seems like you can't pick up the paper every day or or turn on the TV or the internet and not see that they're that that North Korea is challenging more and more, South Korea. Uh it it's It's not a pretty picture and it really isn't uh very encouraging for the future. I'd like to hear your thoughts on that.

Michelle Steel (Witness)1:07:50 – 1:09:08

As I said on the opening statement that my both parents fled from North Korea from communism. They lost everything there and they came down to South Korea and they rebuilt. And then my father became diplomat and then went to Japan and then we came to United States. We all know that how many people suffering in North Korea. That's why we need very strong alliance between United States and Japan and South Korea. It's not just protecting South Korea, but it's protecting all in the Pacific region. So that's why we have to have a strong alliance between United States and United States been there. And our relationship is really ironclad. And we have a very, very strong relationship. It's not just military-wise, but economy side same thing too. So because of US's help, that Korean economy just grew top in the world for top six. So I'm very proud that I c if confirmed that love to be in South Korea, we gonna work better and we gonna work together, and we gonna have stronger relationship. between South Korea and United States.

Sen. Risch (ID)1:09:09 – 1:09:55

Well said. Thank you so much. Um, Mister Brat, uh, the um AUKUS agreement has really reinvigorated the relationship between the United States and uh and Australia, and I know I'm sure you followed that. Uh, there's a lot of us that have been uh involved in that from the very beginning and are very enthusiastic about it. Um, then uh following that, of course, we've got the new critical minerals agreement, which I'm sure you're uh aware of. That's something that uh uh we're w is really necessary for us, for the free world really. Uh and again that has helped reinvigorate our relationship. I know Australia's got some uh we we think uh we have a China problem here. They got a real China problem there. Uh your thoughts.

David Brat (Witness)1:09:56 – 1:12:45

Y yes uh thank you Chairman uh uh let me just start off wi with the rare mineral piece. Uh, I'm not a chemist, but I'm trying to get up to speed on all that. I I talked to the heads of national security and they put it in terms that I had not yet heard, right? So if you look at the economic value of the rare earth minerals, et cetera, it doesn't really show up. Uh, but what what is so important about the rare earths, the minerals and the processing is that they're vital to every aspect of the economy, every aspect of our economy. Uh, not just the F thirty fives. not just the submarine engines, your lawnmower engine, et cetera, right on down the line. And the impact of uh of uh i- i- if we get into an adversarial position on that with with some of the countries around the world right now, that that can have the loss of of of that uh trading of rare minerals can have a significant GDP effect that that goes beyond a few percent. And so I think it's important to convey that to the American people, as you said, the importance of that and con convey how important Australia is to us. They're mining experts, they're processing e- uh experts, they're refining experts, they have engineers. Uh, we need to get that skill base going over here and invest beyond STEM into that kind of engineering in the processing of the rare earths, where China's got ninety percent, uh, of of the processing, uh, around the world. And so I'm gonna work on that. Uh, well, probably one of my main priorities, uh, working the uh mission and the embassy. And then uh on AUKUS uh as you've just laid out and I see my Senator Kane walking in the room the AUKUS the AUKUS uh I know is uh vital in his work. Uh that's huge, that's that's just not a submarine deal, it's you know that's three submarines over a decade and then three more down in Adelaide but built with the UK and interoperability, and all this kind of thing. Uh nuclear powered conventionally uh conventional arms uh i- is important in that respect. Uh, Australia's already put over two billion into industrial production on AUKUS, and that doesn't even include the subs yet. And so, but the, the key I think to that piece is it is a model, uh, for a multilateral, uh, uh, coordination, uh, with the UK, uh, as we pivot to the Pacific. Now we have the UK with Australia, with the United States, uh with interoperability with the with the Marines, uh more forces are on the way, uh we have to work that out with Australia, uh but that that AUKUS framework uh is is much more uh than than just uh industrial uh, you know, economics. It it we it it it's security for the South Pacific.

Sen. Risch (ID)1:12:45 – 1:12:45

Yeah.

David Brat (Witness)1:12:45 – 1:13:00

A- and right now we're having maritime challenges across the board throughout the islands. uh all the way through the Marianas, up through South Korea, the Philippines, uh and so I look forward to working with this committee uh on on those issues.

Sen. Risch (ID)1:13:00 – 1:13:16

I I think you've got uh a good understanding of this, and your particularly your focus on the critical minerals. I was really surprised uh when the Aussies tell us they got like fifty-three of the fifty-five we're looking for there, Yeah, yeah. and and uh they've got processing figured out, which is gonna be really important to us. Senator Shaheen.

Sen. Shaheen (NH)1:13:17 – 1:13:47

Thank you, Mister Chairman. Um, Mr. Dahl, as I said in my opening remarks, um, your predecessor, excuse me, last year, or when he came before the committee, couldn't commit to following the law. And, um, I appreciate your, um, state opening statement and your adherence to the law, but I feel compelled to ask you this question. Um, do you commit to following the law if you are confirmed for this post?

Dahl1:13:48 – 1:13:54

Absolutely, Senator. We all have confirmed, taken oath to the constitution and the lawyer's role is to follow and advise on the law.

Sen. Shaheen (NH)1:13:55 – 1:14:21

Um, well Last year the administration let five billion dollars in foreign aid and international organization funding expire without congressional approval. The chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, of which I'm a member, um who is a member of the majority party, called that a clear violation of the law. Do you agree that funds that are appropriated by Congress should be spent as provided by Congress?

Dahl1:14:23 – 1:15:01

Thank you, Senator, and obviously I recognize the criticality of the appropriations process and uh the various uh components of the appropriations uh bills, the mandatory spending bills. I don't know what the internal discussions were or the legal uh analysis that was done on those issues. But I know that in the process of analyzing any sorts of appropriations bills, there will be recognition for mandatory spending clauses, uh, incorporations by reference, and an additional analysis which I would be working on the team to address. With the team to address, excuse me.

Sen. Shaheen (NH)1:15:02 – 1:15:33

Well, you make me a little nervous, Mister Dahl, because I hear that as hedging. I think that was a simple question, um, a yes or no question, but I would ask that you commit to explain the department's view on why you believe the path that you're recommending on whatever the issue is is legal. Um do you commit to do that and to share with the committee those views? Because um I also serve on the armed services committee and it's been like pulling teeth to try and get legal opinions for actions through the military.

Dahl1:15:33 – 1:15:45

Yes, Senator, I absolutely commit to that type of transparency in discussion. It's something that's been a healthy part of my experience in the past with the federal government on engaging with the relevant committees and would continue to do so if confirmed.

Sen. Shaheen (NH)1:15:46 – 1:16:28

Thank you. Mister Brandt, in twenty twenty four you said that if you were still in Congress, you would oppose additional support for Ukraine. Now, if confirmed, you're gonna be headed to one of our most important posts in the Indo-Pacific, as we've all acknowledged. But Australia is also a major donor of equipment and training to Ukraine, um, including through contributions to the the Perl program. despite not being in Europe or NATO. So if confirmed, will you work to ensure that Australia's doll dollars that have been contributed toward the Pearl program go toward the intended goal of providing Ukraine with US made weapons and not be used for something else?

David Brat (Witness)1:16:29 – 1:16:47

Yeah, yes, of course. Uh, Australia is a sovereign country. Uh, they will be our partner. They've been our best partner for a hundred years. Uh, I'll be working underneath the president of the United States, if confirmed, underneath Secretary Rubio. Uh, again, if confirmed, and I will get security clearances that might help educate me, uh, beyond what I know now.

Sen. Shaheen (NH)1:16:47 – 1:17:27

Thank you. Um, General Wendt, I am, as I said I'm a big fan of the partnership that the United States has had with Albania. Um, I find Prime Minister Rama uh to be very interesting and uh one of the things that I'm encouraged is that as um a tall man yourself, you will stand eye to eye with Prime Minister Rama. Prime Minister Rama has what he calls the tall man's caucus, so um I'm delighted that you will be able to join him in that, and I I think you should share that with him if you're approved and on the ground.

David Brat (Witness)1:17:22 – 1:17:24

So exactly. Yeah.

Sen. Shaheen (NH)1:17:28 – 1:18:16

Um but one of the things I think we should continue to do is to support Albania's efforts to reform, um, which are part of its EU membership ambitions. They've created an anti-corruption body, the Special Structure Against Corruption and Organized Crime, or SPAC it's called. I assume that's how they pronounce it. And it's been very successful in tackling transnational criminal organizations and high level corruption. I think it's a great example of what US foreign assistance has been able to support, um, to safeguard Albania's democracy. investments in the country. So can you talk a little bit about from your perspective what role you think that kind of a corruption body can play in supporting the investment climate in Albania?

Wendt1:18:19 – 1:21:12

Thank you, Senator, for that uh very important question. And uh just before I get into it, I will make a point uh if confirmed of uh discussing the Tall Man's Caucus uh ov over in Albania. Um A a the the the SPAC um is uh from everything that I read. In in my previous visits in Albania, I I didn't I did not interact with them. I was interacting with military and and with regular people in Albania. The the the SPAC from everything that I read um is has been a very valuable organization. It has been apolitical. It has been independent. The uh uh uh prosecutors. that uh go into the SPAC or undergo very careful vetting uh to include being polygraphed. They are overseen by the IMO, the International Monitoring Organization, with both Europeans and Americans. They have uh their own investigative body with the NBI. They're the National Bureau of Investigation. They have their own uh special prosecutor's office with the the SPO, the uh that's there, and their own special courts. And they're codified in article one forty eight of the Albanian constitution. And so, uh, i if confirmed, uh, I can I can certainly commit to, uh, uh, pushing forward in supporting their continued apolitical and independent operations. You mentioned the, uh, transnational criminal organizations also that they're that they're working against. They have they have been invaluable. everything again that I have read about them, their uh information sharing with US law enforcement agencies there in Toronto, uh with the Department of Justice, the FBI, the DEA plug uh that is there, it has been seamless. It's been transparent. And it has resulted in the US, I I I'm told, and again I in reading about it, that uh it has resulted in uh prosecutions against uh criminal elements in the United States. in US cities, and also uh fairly recently in a multi-ton uh interdiction of cocaine coming out of Paraguay. So uh to to just to sum uh I I think their work in these areas are critical, uh as long as they remain apolitical and independent. And I I also think that effect on US business opportunities with contract law enforcement, Uh, it will aid in security and tenders, uh, transparency. Uh, and it will it it it will level the playing field help help to level the playing field for US businesses uh in Albania. Thank you, Senator.

Sen. Shaheen (NH)1:21:12 – 1:21:14

Good. Thank you very much. Thank you.

Sen. Risch (ID)1:21:15 – 1:21:16

Thank you. Senator Daines.

Sen. Daines (MT)1:21:17 – 1:22:03

Mr. Chairman, thank you, I am struck by how highly qualified this panel is today. Uh, thank you for stepping back into the arena to serve our country in these very important capacities. I want to start with my Norwegian ski jumper, um. I we share uh Norwegian heritage thanks to our mothers, uh you your mother as well as my mother w- was an Ericsson. Um as you know Norway was one of the original members of NATO, it's long shared a contentious border with Russia, and has a very clear-eyed vision of the threats it possessed. Norway has been a most important partner for the United States. How would you as ambassador prioritize Norway and Europe's posturing towards Russia?

Kavookjan1:22:06 – 1:23:03

Well, thank you for that important question, Senator, and I I agree with everything you said. I actually have given a lot of thought as to uh how I would uh signal my priorities uh we haven't if I were confirmed. We haven't had an ambassador there for a while, so I think it's important that the next ambassador hit the ground running. And it uh again, this would be if I were confirmed, I have a I have a plan. Uh and that plan is as follows. Uh obviously on landing in Oslo the first thing I would do is present my credentials to the king which would be a a great honor, one of the great honors of my life, and then proceed to give my introductory talk to the embassy staff. I would then plan again following all the necessary protocols, to immediately get on a plane and fly to Kirkenes on the Russian border with uh top-level Norwegian military and intelligence officials

Sen. Daines (MT)1:23:03 – 1:23:03

Mm.

Kavookjan1:23:03 – 1:23:28

to hold meetings with them and local officials about the uh Russian and Chinese activities on the on the border and uh the threats that that they're perceiving uh there as well as in the greater Arctic. I think that would send a very clear signal uh as to what my priorities are, and I think it's important that we we do that.

Sen. Daines (MT)1:23:29 – 1:24:02

You've thought this through, thank you. I think that would send a very strong message out of the gate, in terms of priorities and importance. Um General Wendt, uh you're not only tall, but you were thirty years as a Green Beret, so I thank the tall man caucus here, uh Senator Shaheen. He certainly has been sending the right guy over there to stand tall for America in Albania. You've got an incredible amount of experience leading soldiers, working with embassies around the world, including direct experience with the Albanian military. How do you believe this experience would enable you to have conversations to advance our interest in Albania?

Wendt1:24:04 – 1:27:29

Thank you. Thank you, Senator, for that question. Um When I when I arrive at a at a uh at an organization that I'm going to lead uh what I've done both as the again as a US security coordinator in Israel, in the Palestinian Authority, and then also uh uh taking command of all of NATO's special operations troopers, that the first thing I like to do is to uh listen. And some of the worst uh leaders I've ever found in any, whether it's civilian or or military organization, are those that show up on day one and just say, this is how it's gonna be. And so what I plan is an assessment, if confirmed. Uh an assessment, uh the the third line of that assessment, or excuse me, the second line of that assessment, uh as as I mentioned in the opening remarks is uh making America stronger in ways that are mutually beneficial and making Albania stronger also. So a key piece to this, uh Albanians uh uh I have found the Albanians that I've served when with both in Afghanistan and again as as the commander for NATO, uh special operations. Uh they have guts. They're they're they're good men. And um so making sure that uh they are properly equipped, that they meet NAG NATO's capability targets. Uh Albania has this last year according to NATO numbers that I have read, met their two percent Hague uh GDP spending requirement, and of course they have signed up now for the uh five percent uh uh uh, uh excuse me, five percent out of The Hague and two percent out of Wales. Uh GDP three point five percent of base uh uh costs for defence and then one point five for infrastructure and cyber and some of the others. I'm confident that there will be, as a part of this assessment, there will be a uh uh a plethora of ways that we will be able to find that are beneficial for our NATO alliance with them and strengthening them, um that will go across the military domains, that meet uh current NATO capability targets, and then also infrastructure pieces that can be dual use potentially for military uh and for uh uh uh civilian uh uh growth there. Porto Romano uh is one of the one of the key ports there that uh currently uh i if it had, in the future, a uh a a secure cargo facility, a a secure pier. It's co-located uh with, it won't be effective till twenty thirty as the target, but with a pan-European corridor number eight. And then from there, military items could absolutely flow uh in, and that would be very beneficial uh for NATO. Benef and beneficial by the way for potentially US businesses that can help uh in those uh uh port improvements and infrastructure improvements. So I I think a a key piece to to put a pointed piece on your question, Senator, is to after going in, getting on the ground, I'm just a such a believer of I've learned around the world that I I really don't know a lot unless I personally see what's happening on the ground. And I'll I will look forward to forwarding that.

Sen. Daines (MT)1:27:29 – 1:27:34

General Wen, thank you. I know I'm out of time here, and congrats on your new grandchild by the way as well. Mr. Chairman, thank you.

Sen. Risch (ID)1:27:35 – 1:27:36

Uh, thank you, Senator, Senator.

Sen. Curtis (UT)1:27:37 – 1:29:36

Uh, thank you very much, uh, Mr. Chairman. Um, uh, General Wen, uh, there's been a disturbing and growing list of examples in the Balkan region, where the Trump family and political allies of the president have been seeking to use their proximity to power in order to get rich. Um, there's the example of the Trump hotel proposed to be built in Belgrade, which fell apart amidst a massive corruption probe um regarding permits that likely were not supposed to be given. There is the example of Trump ally Michael Flynn and Trump's personal election lawyer having won approval to build a lucrative energy pipeline worth millions of dollars in the region despite these two individuals having zero experience in energy infrastructure. There's actually an emerging story in Albania where some of the presidents Political consultants are now making millions off of advising uh the opposition. Um In Albania, this is a country that's made a lot of progress on corruption. Um but I do worry that our diplomats in the region are being asked um to facilitate these contracts that are not in the best interest of the United States, but are putting money into the pockets of Trump himself, his family and his friends. And so I just want a a personal commitment from you, um, that you are not gonna be in the business of trying to facilitate um, business that's not in the best interests of the United States, but is in the best interests of people close to the president. And, um, your commitment that you will stand up uh in our effort, long-standing effort, to fight corruption in Albania. Albania is a great friend. um but a country that still needs to make progress and our embassy there has to be fighting corruption, not helping to enable it.

Wendt1:29:39 – 1:30:48

Well thank you, Senator, for your question. Uh I I I'm I'm not uh familiar to be with uh p- uh personal, you know, family pres of family investments uh in Albania, but I I uh i- if there are any questions about their personal interactions, uh I I would Direct you to them. I kn I know my job as a US ambassador is to facilitate US businesses. And if they are conducting business, they're all US businesses without preferential or derogatory treatment uh based on personalities. I just my job, I wanna make sure that things are done the right way, that the rule of the law is followed, that the playing field is level, and uh Uh, and and, uh, the second piece, Senator, you mentioned about corruption. Again, I agree, the the the SPAC organization that is there, the special structure against uh uh uh corruption and organized crime, uh I I believe has been, from what I read, has been very effective. I'll I'll look forward to getting on the ground to to understand really uh what's happening and not happening,

Sen. Curtis (UT)1:30:48 – 1:30:52

I I I think the the phrase you used uh

Wendt1:30:48 – 1:30:48

but

Sen. Curtis (UT)1:30:52 – 1:31:17

make sure the playing field is level. That's what's most important. Um, because, um, right now it doesn't look like it's level. It looks like if you're a friend of the president, you get advantage, even from the embassy, in pushing your business deals. Um, of course, your job is to stand up for US interests, but we wanna make sure that every US business, not just those that have connections to the president, um, get a chance to do business in the Balkans.

Wendt1:31:17 – 1:31:24

Um, thank you. And I can commit that to you, Senator. I will, I will, uh, uh, ensure across the board to be advocating for US businesses.

Sen. Curtis (UT)1:31:25 – 1:32:04

Mr. Dahl, um, I I I understand you're gonna be sensitive about commenting on the war in Iran, but just give us a broad sense of how you think about the kind of hostilities that would require uh the administration to come to Congress for consent. Obviously, this is the most sacred clause, some may argue, in the entire Constitution. Um, just, you know, let me let me give you a real world example. Um, does a conventional ground war, like the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, um, are those, uh, the kind of military engagements that require congressional authorization?

Dahl1:32:06 – 1:32:46

Senator, thank you for the question. I'm obviously, uh, sensitive to how live of an issue this is for all of us and the significance which, uh, we take the discussion Uh obviously the question of defining hostilities has been something that the executive branch in conversation with the legislature has uh been examining since for fifty years since the War Powers Resolution was passed. And the there's a myriad uh of OLC opinions that look at different facts and circumstances, and as an attorney, my obligation is to take a objective analysis in conversation with the other

Sen. Curtis (UT)1:32:50 – 1:33:17

I I I appreciate your your careful answer here, um and I'm not trying to provide a gotcha, but but maybe just just, and I'm over my time, just maybe try to answer my direct question, because I I hope it's an easy one. For a conventional war like Afghanistan and Iraq, would you agree that those wars required congressional authorization, that the president did not have the power to engage in those conflicts without The authorization of Congress.

Dahl1:33:17 – 1:33:33

Uh again, uh, Senator, these things can seem very simple. You have to look at the facts and circumstances relating to every single event that you're discussing. And if called upon to analyze these types of issues, I would be taking them all fact by fact to give that type of

Sen. Curtis (UT)1:33:33 – 1:33:35

I think that was a pretty easy question,

Dahl1:33:34 – 1:33:34

Yeah.

Sen. Curtis (UT)1:33:35 – 1:33:37

but I'm uh over my time. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Sen. Risch (ID)1:33:38 – 1:33:39

Thank you, Senator Ricketts.

Sen. Ricketts (NE)1:33:40 – 1:36:09

Thank you much, Mr. Chairman, and thank you to all of our candidates. and your families for your willingness to continue to serve the United States. Uh, we are really lucky to have people like you and your families who are willing to step up and serve our nation. So thank you for what you're doing. Uh, Congressman Steele, you uh talked about your your experience in fleeing North Korea. One of my friends who's since passed away was uh a Marine corporal during the Korean War. And he would be so proud of looking at you know those satellite maps that show the Korean peninsula at night, where you can see above the thirty eighth parallel, it's all black, and below it you see the lights of Seoul and all the other Korean cities that are vibrant. And it always made him feel good that he had been a part of that conflict to help preserve the freedom for at least half the peninsula. And looking, I think, to the chairman's point about how much South Korea has done versus what's happened in the north. Um, so I think it is, uh, as you mentioned, it's it's a the linchpin of our Indo-Pacific alliance and security is that relationship with the Republic of Korea, because it exemplifies exactly what we as free nations can do to oppose tyranny. And that's why this is very, very important. Under, um, President Trump, that partnership has evolved to prioritize economic and supply chains, and I think you mentioned that as well. Certainly last year's Korea strategic trade and investment deal was a a historically forward, and in that deal, uh Seoul pledged to eliminate the non-tariff barriers and end discrimination against US firms. However, USTR USTR's March twenty twenty six national trade estimate tells a little bit of a different story there. It highlights a broad range of Korean barriers continue to stifle American agricultural and digital services. A particular concern is South Korea's recent decision to end voluntary additions to the soybean quota, import quota. The US provides about eighty percent of uh Korea's soybean imports. This policy hurts farmers in my home state of Nebraska. We cannot celebrate new deals while old barriers remain or new ones are being created. American farmers and companies deserve the full benefits of agreements that we signed. if confirmed, will you commit to ensuring the full implementation of the Korean strategic trade and investment deal?

Michelle Steel (Witness)1:36:11 – 1:36:36

Thank you, Senator, for that question, and first of all that I wanted to say thank you to all those uh Korean veterans that they've been serving in South Korea uh the uh during the Korean War, because if they were not there, I was never born because my father and my mother came from different region of North Korea to South. That's the way they met in South Korea, and I'm here,

Sen. Ricketts (NE)1:36:36 – 1:36:36

Mm.

Michelle Steel (Witness)1:36:36 – 1:37:21

and I'm so grateful for that. For the trade issue, actually there's a joint fact sheet. There's a three hundred fifty billion dollars is coming in, mostly investment in United States and and we have three most important things right there between South Korea and United States, is we um advancing that US ROK, that alliance military capabilities important. Second thing is trade. Um trade issue for the uh beans and other egg cultures that if confirmed that I'm gonna sit down with the Korean government and whoever that needs control of these trade issues because

Sen. Ricketts (NE)1:37:18 – 1:37:18

Mm-hmm.

Michelle Steel (Witness)1:37:21 – 1:37:59

that joint fact sheet is not really clear about that three hundred fifty billion dollars plus a hundred fifty dollar ship building. So I wanna see that exactly where that's coming from. On the ch free trade agreement between South Korea and United States right now that it's surplus in South Korea over fifty billion dollars I always think that ch free trade is always win-win and we can renegotiate so love to see that excite that how we gonna actually export more to South Korea if I confirm. I get confirmed.

Sen. Ricketts (NE)1:37:58 – 1:38:00

Great. Wonderful, Congresswoman Steele.

Michelle Steel (Witness)1:37:59 – 1:37:59

Thank you.

Sen. Ricketts (NE)1:38:01 – 1:39:01

Also, you know, AI has the potential to revolutionize many industries and and dictate the global balance of power. Some of the conductor supply chains are critical to winning this race, and we cannot see this dominance to our adversaries. Our current export controls have seen some success, but there are still loopholes that are dangerous that remain. While American firms follow the law, some foreign companies, including Korean ones, are backfilling communist China with dual-use tools, We need to permanently close these loopholes. It's one of the reasons why I introduced the Match Act with Senator Kim, Risch and Sch- Senators Kim, Risch and Schumer to be able to help do this. We've added Senators Crapo, Shaheen, Cotton, Coons, Warren and Banks who would welcome other co-sponsors. The bill levels the playing field for American companies and US technology um must not power the coercion of our Korean allies in the West Sea or other partners in the Indo-Pacific. If you're confirmed, will you commit to ensuring that the ROK prioritize collaboration on these emerging technologies to prevent them from getting into Communist China's hands?

Michelle Steel (Witness)1:39:02 – 1:39:09

Thank you, Senator, and thank you for introducing matching matching act and yes, I'd love to do that

Sen. Ricketts (NE)1:39:09 – 1:39:10

Great.

Michelle Steel (Witness)1:39:10 – 1:39:11

if if I get confirmed.

Sen. Ricketts (NE)1:39:10 – 1:39:13

Thank you very much. Uh, we'll work on that. Thank you.

Sen. Risch (ID)1:39:16 – 1:39:18

Thank you. Senator, uh, let's see, Senator Keene.

Sen. Kaine (VA)1:39:18 – 1:39:53

Yeah, thank you, Mister Chair, and congratulations to all the witnesses. I'm I'm gonna start with my Virginian colleague, uh, Representative Brad, he and I served together in the Virginia delegation, but he made a controversial decision earlier in his career when I was governor. I asked him to serve on the governor's board of economists to give advice to Virginia on revenue forecasts. And of course he agreed to serve the Commonwealth. And later when he was running for office as a Republican, the fact that he had agreed to serve at the request of a democratic governor got him in a little bit of hot water. So I don't wanna hurt him with my colleagues on the other side of the aisle. But he

Sen. Risch (ID)1:39:53 – 1:39:56

He's standing in line here, so it's an early bet.

Sen. Kaine (VA)1:39:55 – 1:40:38

But he but he but he did a good job for the Commonwealth and a and a good job in Congress. Um, Representative Brad, I just wanna say this, I just came back from um, Australia and I heard what you said about AUKUS and and just two thoughts from thirty-seven events in seven days in four cities. Um, it's a really powerful um uh alliance, the Australians, whether it's the the the government or the opposition, strongly in support. Um there was a report at the Pentagon sort of questioning the, uh, Bridge Colby did it, questioning Australian compliance and also questioning us, some tough love for both sides. And one of his questions was are the Aussies investing enough in the infrastructure, and what I saw tells me yes, and and you'll reach your own conclusion.

Sen. Risch (ID)1:40:36 – 1:40:37

Yeah.

Sen. Kaine (VA)1:40:38 – 1:41:10

But one thing I did hear that I just wanted to bring to your attention is, there's huge opportunity for American businesses to do work, say in critical mining and also in the AUKUS partnership, there's a little bit of anxiety on the on the Australian side about AUKUS, that if all the work is done by American firms in Australia, hey, what about our great innovative defense firms? So I hope you'll not only engage American firms, but look for joint venture opportunities and make sure the Australian firms know that they're also really welcome to help this relationship be all that it can be.

David Brat (Witness)1:41:12 – 1:41:21

Yeah, no, I I appreciate the comments and the question and uh, Of course, that's uh, I've been getting more LinkedIn friends over the past month than I I got chamber people, press people,

Sen. Kaine (VA)1:41:21 – 1:41:22

Good.

David Brat (Witness)1:41:22 – 1:42:00

I'm staying quiet and if confirmed I'm gonna go all in on the business side. Uh, the President and uh Secretary Rubio a couple of weeks ago sent a miss about to all the ambassadors uh on top of everything else, uh foreign direct investment, but it it that's gotta be a win-win, you know what Michelle was just saying, uh i- i- i- i- that's the way free markets work. Right, and so it's win-win. They're our good friends. I I I have a very positive feeling about the Australian people. I think they like us, uh and we need to step up and show that we're all in. And uh with respect to uh Bridge and all that, the president said uh full speed ahead.

Sen. Kaine (VA)1:42:00 – 1:42:01

Yep.

David Brat (Witness)1:42:01 – 1:42:03

I think Bridge said, " I work for the president,

Sen. Kaine (VA)1:42:01 – 1:42:03

Really good. Yeah.

David Brat (Witness)1:42:04 – 1:42:05

it's full speed ahead."

Sen. Kaine (VA)1:42:05 – 1:42:05

Sure.

David Brat (Witness)1:42:05 – 1:42:11

And so uh I'm full speed ahead. I I I I've been amazed and very happy to see the bipartisan

Sen. Kaine (VA)1:42:12 – 1:42:12

Yeah.

David Brat (Witness)1:42:12 – 1:42:16

nature of the work uh on all of Australia, every every meeting I had with the majority,

Sen. Kaine (VA)1:42:15 – 1:42:15

Yeah, the

David Brat (Witness)1:42:16 – 1:42:17

the majority,

Sen. Kaine (VA)1:42:16 – 1:42:19

the l- the last AUKUS call we did was a Ricketts' can- you know,

David Brat (Witness)1:42:17 – 1:42:17

yeah.

Sen. Kaine (VA)1:42:19 – 1:42:21

every deal we do in AUKUS is very bipartisan,

David Brat (Witness)1:42:19 – 1:42:20

Yeah.

Sen. Kaine (VA)1:42:22 – 1:42:22

so thank you for that.

David Brat (Witness)1:42:22 – 1:42:23

Yeah, sure.

Sen. Kaine (VA)1:42:23 – 1:43:37

Representative Steele, I wanna congratulate you for your nomination. You may not know this, but you and I were cosponsors of a piece of legislation in each house that passed that was really meaningful to me but I know it's even much more meaningful to you, the Korean-American divided families National Registry Act. You were the lead sponsor on the House side. Senator Cruz and I sponsored it on the Senate side. It got included in the NDA in twenty six. And the idea of it is what can we do to help families that were divided by the war to at least start to at at least start to gather the information that would enable them to, uh, communicate one to another. And I don't really need to ask you about it because since you were the sponsor, I know, should you be confirmed, you'll make that a priority, the relationship between South of North Korea is pretty tough right now, but I think you would be the perfect person to make that a priority, and I look forward to supporting your nomination. I just have one minute left, and so I do wanna direct a question to to Mr. Dahl. Um, you're a good lawyer, you give a lot of advice to clients, and you've worked in government for for a good while. Um, you would agree with me that that being as communicative and transparent as you can be with this committee in Congress is an important aspect of your work, correct?

Dahl1:43:38 – 1:43:49

Yes, Senator, that's been a part of my past work and I understand in important part uh some of these issues we are discussing are a dialogue uh between the branches and that's a priority.

Sen. Kaine (VA)1:43:49 – 1:45:47

Yep. And and I know that you have a chain of command and you know and and they have opinions about these things too and I I get that, but but here is an issue for my committee colleagues. Wars are always accompanied by a legal opinion that's written by the office of legal counsel. the Justice Department, you referred to OLC opinions earlier. I've been here for nearly fourteen years. Every time we've been engaged in anything that's hostilities, there's a legal opinion, and the Senate gets to look at it. Often look at it unclassified, but we at least get to look at it. Um, we're at day eighty-two in this war against Iran, and the administration is refusing to let us look at the OLC legal opinion. Um, they're asking for a trillion and a half dollars in the defense budget this year. But they will not even let members of the committee's armed services, foreign relations, appropriations, intel review the legal opinion. Now, as a lawyer, I ju- I can't ask you about the OLC, you're not up here for that position, but when a lawyer tells me, we have a legal justification for war, but, sorry, Senator, we're not gonna let you look at it. some natural thoughts occur, it it doesn't even have to be a particularly suspicious mind to say, hmm, that's never happened before. Why can't we see the legal opinion? Is there something about it that's questionable? Is there a factual statement in it? That's wrong. And so I I I appreciate you saying you recognize that communication dialogue transparency is important. I would say to my colleagues, whatever we think about the war, this committee the members of this committee, which have jurisdictions over war powers issues, should be able to see the legal opinion on which it's based. And I we've made a request and been rebuffed, a bipartisan request, and we've been rebuffed in that request. I hope we might follow up and eventually get to see the legal opinion. Thank you.

Sen. Risch (ID)1:45:49 – 1:45:50

Sir May Holland.

Sen. Van Hollen (MD)1:45:53 – 1:46:12

Uh, thank you, Mr. Chairman. Um, Congressman Breit, good to see you. Congratulations to all of you on your nominations. Uh, Mr. Dahl, a question for you. Uh, you would agree that if confirmed, you have a duty to provide the Secretary of State and the administration with your very best legal advice, right?

Dahl1:46:14 – 1:46:14

Yes, Senator, always.

Sen. Van Hollen (MD)1:46:15 – 1:47:10

And so I wanna ask you some questions based on legal principles, and I wanna start with the issue of blockades. And there's a Supreme Court decision from eighteen sixty-two that lays the foundation on this question, uh, in the prize cases, and I'm quoting from the opinion, "The proclamation of a blockade," made by President Lincoln at the time, " The proclamation of a blockade is itself official and conclusive evidence to the court that a state of war existed." This may be an old opinion. But it's current and good law in my view. Do you know anything that would dispute the finding in this Supreme Court decision that a blockade if you're s- blockading someone, you're at war with them?

Dahl1:47:11 – 1:47:30

Senator, I think whenever you review old precedent, it's very um important to look at the facts and circumstances relating to the words that are used how they're used now how they've been used over time. And when you are analyzing and giving advice on the basis of those types of precedents, the words matter a lot.

Sen. Risch (ID)1:47:30 – 1:47:31

Mm-hmm.

Dahl1:47:30 – 1:47:35

Um, th this word has been used much in the public debate.

Sen. Risch (ID)1:47:31 – 1:47:31

Yeah.

Dahl1:47:35 – 1:47:51

It has many different meanings to many different parties. And so as part of an analysis that you would be doing uh as the attorney when with the team responsible for those issues, you have to get down to the exact meaning, what the context was, how it's defined, and what that means for the advice you're giving now.

Sen. Van Hollen (MD)1:47:51 – 1:47:55

So when you say this word has been Do you mean the word blockade? Is that what you're referring to?

Dahl1:47:55 – 1:47:55

Yes.

Sen. Van Hollen (MD)1:47:55 – 1:47:56

Okay.

Dahl1:47:56 – 1:47:56

Yes.

Sen. Van Hollen (MD)1:47:56 – 1:48:38

Um, well, you're right, let's look at some more up-to-date legal opinions from the United States government. I'm looking at an OLC opinion from January, nineteen sixty one, uh, and reading here, quote, a blockade is a bellar belligerent act which as a matter of international law is ordinarily justified only if a state of war legal or de facto exists. So, There's no other opinion that I'm aware of from the U S government that contests that finding. And so, simple question, uh, do you think that that statement, just that statement, is legally correct?

Dahl1:48:39 – 1:48:42

Senator, w- again, when w- when you're outwards

Sen. Van Hollen (MD)1:48:41 – 1:49:05

I'm not asking, with with all due respect, I'm not asking about facts. I know you have to apply the f- this to the facts, but this is the statement It says, a blockade is a belligerent act which is a matter of international law, is ordinarily justified only if a state of war, legal or de facto exists. Do you agree with the statement in the most current OLC opinion?

Dahl1:49:05 – 1:49:15

Yeah, and again, Senator, respectfully, when a lawyer is advising on these types of questions, it's always more than just a simple yes or no, and it would be imprudent for me to answer it that way.

Sen. Van Hollen (MD)1:49:14 – 1:49:17

Yeah. Well, with respect to somebody who practiced law,

Dahl1:49:16 – 1:49:16

But

Sen. Van Hollen (MD)1:49:17 – 1:49:33

I find it really surprising that you can't answer a simple question that's been the basis of Supreme Court decisions and US law. Do you dispute the fact that there's a blockade, a US blockade in effect against Iran right now?

Dahl1:49:34 – 1:50:02

I see that it has been described that way. I don't have all the facts and circumstances about how the naval assets or uh, spread across the region and what the considerations would be relating to that. But certainly in the context of an international armed conflict, the quote that you referenced discussed international law. International law of course is a distinct body from the domestic law. And sometimes words are used uh between those two, but they have very different meanings.

Sen. Van Hollen (MD)1:50:02 – 1:50:03

Well, with respect,

Dahl1:50:03 – 1:50:03

Since the

Sen. Van Hollen (MD)1:50:03 – 1:50:38

what I was reading from the OLC opinion in the early Supreme Court case, i the Supreme Court case was was US law. Let me i if in case you have any doubt that we have a a blockade on. Let me just read you from Secretary Hexeth's statement. Um, he goes on to say, which is why our ironclad blockade remains in full effect as well. President Trump s quote, "The blockade is genius. The blockade is one hundred percent foolproof." Are you really doubting that we have a blockade in effect in Iran?

Dahl1:50:38 – 1:51:14

But Senator, uh, thank you, and I think the issue is that when you are using those terms in the context of both international and domestic law, there are implications, and you have to analyse what those implications are. For example, Uh, w wait, wait, wait. we discussed I discussed with Senator Murphy the War Powers Resolution, Yeah. which uses different terms around war and conflict. Yeah. And when you use the word blockade, it has implications in both international law and domestic law. And so just agreeing to simple framings of that concept is not acceptable for a lawyer. You have to be able to handle these.

Sen. Van Hollen (MD)1:51:12 – 1:51:29

So the President of the United States and the Secretary of Defense are, to use your words, just engaged in a simple framing. Let me ask you a simple framing question. If a foreign power blockaded the United States, would you consider that an act of war or would you have to really look at all the facts?

Dahl1:51:30 – 1:51:32

Again, when you're saying " blockades the United States",

Sen. Van Hollen (MD)1:51:32 – 1:51:35

A blockade, let me let me describe the blockade.

Dahl1:51:32 – 1:51:34

you're just putting yourself in a good position.

Sen. Van Hollen (MD)1:51:35 – 1:51:48

A hundred percent full pl- proof blockade as President Trump. If a foreign power imposed a one hundred percent blockade on the United States, do you have any doubt that we would consider that an act of war?

Dahl1:51:49 – 1:52:04

Senator, the question about uh an act of war, declaration of war is a conversation the branch uh the the congressional branch has a say in that and again sitting here right now speaking in terms of hypotheticals, it's just too

Sen. Van Hollen (MD)1:52:05 – 1:52:56

Yeah. With with respect, Mr. Chairman, this is not a hypothetical. As the Secretary of Defense, as the President of the United States have said, we have a hundred percent blockade. That is not hypothetical. It's happening as we speak. And we also know that international law, as well as previous US opinions, say that if you've got a blockade, that is an act of war. And I understand why you and the administration are ducking this issue. It is because of the War Powers Act. because you can't you wanna toll the War Powers Act at sixty days and pretend this conflict is over while we have a blockade which US legal opinion has said means we're engaged in hostilities and engaged in a war and then you're failing of course to comply with the War Powers Act so thank you Mister Chairman I have no further questions.

Sen. Risch (ID)1:52:56 – 1:52:57

Thank you. Senator Shaheen.

Sen. Shaheen (NH)1:52:58 – 1:53:52

Um I just have um two final points. The first is for you, Miss Thiele. Um, I was pleased to hear you say that you really wanna see where the three hundred and fifty billion is coming from, um, because when when we were in, um, Seoul earlier this year, um, this issue came up, but there was no transparency around how the money was gonna be spent. And the administration has not been transparent with Congress about, um, its investment agreements. either with uh South Korea or with Japan. So I think um this lack of transparency really raises a lot of questions, so I appreciate that you are very interested in seeing what those dollars, where they're coming from and what they're gonna be used for, um and will you commit to sharing that information with this committee?

Michelle Steel (Witness)1:53:52 – 1:53:53

Yes, I do.

Sen. Shaheen (NH)1:53:54 – 1:54:21

Thank you. Um, Mister Kvook, John, I just wanted to say I appreciated your thoughtful um approach to what you would do to send a message to Russia about the commitment that the United States has um and the concern that we have about Russia's actions and the Arctic um in the high north and their other um nefarious activities around the world. So thank you for that commitment. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Sen. Risch (ID)1:54:22 – 1:54:28

Thank Thank you, Senator Shaheen. Would you like to ask another question?

Sen. Shaheen (NH)1:54:31 – 1:54:33

Okay, all right, here we go.

Sen. Risch (ID)1:54:31 – 1:54:34

Feel free. Don't go on and on.

Sen. Shaheen (NH)1:54:35 – 1:55:26

Um, well, let me follow up then, Mister Kvook-John. If if you're confirmed, one of the issues that has been a real concern in the Baltic region has been Russia's sabotage of sub-C cables. And um we have actually have legislation before this committee that's actually gone out of this committee that would address um a response to the activities that we're seeing from Russia and China um from other adversaries that disrupt our sub-C cables. But if you were confirmed, what particular areas of Russia's hybrid war efforts do you think would be important to prioritize um in Norway and with the Norwegians.

Kavookjan1:55:28 – 1:57:31

Well, thank you for that question, Senator. I am familiar with that legislation, which uh you and Senator Sch- Risch uh co-sponsored, and it's great to see bipartisan agreement on these issues. Um the the big priority is the undersea cables, as you pointed out, not just communication cables but pipelines. And we've uh see I'm only have access to open source information right now. Uh, if I'm confirmed, I'll get classified briefings. But just from the open source information, there's so much public activity we need to monitor and encounter with our Norwegian allies, uh, all of these malign activities that we're we're seeing. Every day you seem to see in the news a new report about some some action, uh, and it's not just the, uh, using the shadow fleets to, uh, evade sanctions and to conduct intelligence to monitor cables and and uh oil pipeline uh locations. The Russians are subtly challenging Norwegian sovereignty on Svalbard. That's a very important one that needs to be uh addressed. Uh, you're seeing military parades on May ninth with uh on an island that's not supposed to have any military activity whatsoever. Um. We're seeing uh just the last week or so, we saw a Chinese national uh arrested on Andoya. She had uh was building a twenty-two ton satellite receiver that she said was for weather data. So these are the types of activities going on, and uh I'm gonna work very closely with our Norwegian allies. I hope that this trip I plan to take uh right after my introductory speech will uh not only give me information about what's going on and allow me to see it firsthand, but you know, traveling like that with the top officials will will build a bond early on so we can work together very effectively, I hope.

Sen. Shaheen (NH)1:57:32 – 1:57:33

Thank you. Thank you, Mister Chairman.

Sen. Risch (ID)1:57:33 – 1:57:34

Senator Hagerty.

Sen. Hagerty (TN)1:57:38 – 1:59:09

Thank you, Mister Chairman. And congratulations to all of you here today. Uh, it's quite an honor to be nominated and I hope that you all will navigate the confirmation process well. Um. First, I'd like to start off with you, Miss Thiel. Uh, you and I have had the opportunity to meet to talk about how important the US-Korea relationship is. And I'd like to delve into that with you just a little bit further. It's it's uh no n- no surprise that I view this relationship as a key alliance. Uh, South Korea is one of the countries that shares not only a deep economic partnership with America but also a long-standing security relationship with us. And I would say this too, my my daughters are looking forward to going to the BTS concert in your home state. Um, so it really has a cultural componentry that continues to get deeper and deeper. Um, but if I think about the strengthening ties, one of the key areas that's a great example of that is a project that's happening in my home state, Korea Zinc. And that's a project I wanna make certain that you're aware of. It's highly strategic, has to do with critical minerals, Korea's Inc is coming and making a multi-billion dollar investment in my home state of Tennessee. And I would like you to be uh my partner, if you will, to make certain that you uh get fully up to speed on the project. And I look forward to you, while you're in Korea, if you're confirmed, um making certain that this is a top priority, that it that it be taken care of well. If you'll commit me, commit that to me, I would very appreciate your support of the project.

Michelle Steel (Witness)1:59:09 – 1:59:14

Thank you, Senator. Yes. If I get confirmed, yes, I will support.

Sen. Hagerty (TN)1:59:13 – 1:59:55

Yep. And and I also wanna raise an issue that I hope you'll be able to advocate for us with the South Korean government. Um, it it's also uh disturbing to me, given the depth of the relationship, that particularly with some of our technology companies, uh, that they seem to be discriminated against uh in South Korea. And I would um, you know, I think many of us know the situation with Coupang, but it's also an issue with some of the other large technology companies. So I would very much appreciate your attention to those matters as well, to make certain that all US companies, technology companies and uh alike are not treated in any way differently, not just versus South Korean companies, but for example, Chinese companies.

Michelle Steel (Witness)1:59:56 – 2:00:32

Last year in uh November, President Trump and President Lee, they actually set the agreement for joint backship. On that joint backship, they made it very clear that US companies cannot be discriminate, nor they gonna have unnecessary barriers. So if I get confirmed, yes, I'm gonna follow up with that clearly, because all the Korean companies here in the United States, they get equal treatments. And I think United States companies in South Korea has get equal treatments with their companies too.

Sen. Hagerty (TN)2:00:32 – 2:01:05

I if you're confirmed, you will be carrying the full weight of the United States in your voice. And so your advocacy is advocacy is gonna be absolutely critical. Mister Brad, I'd like to turn to you and and talk with you about your vision for a very important relationship. Um, U S Australia relationship is has also been uh, I think, deepened greatly with with AUKUS. It's a major undertaking. I think it's gonna contribute not only to our joint uh national security, but it's also gonna be a force multiplier for us in the Indo-Pacific. And I just would like to hear from you how you're thinking about the AUKUS relationship, how you'd support it if you were

David Brat (Witness)2:01:05 – 2:01:48

Yeah, thanks, Senator. I uh gave remarks on AUKUS pillar one uh earlier, full speed ahead, uh bipartisan support, uh trilateral nations, uh bringing UK and Europe down into the Pacific on the pivot with our national security strategy. Uh, two billion dollars already put in uh by Australia just for industrial development prior to submarine development. Three subs by the end of the decade, uh another three to be made with the UK, down in Adeline, Australia. Uh so in- interoperability, twenty five hundred marines we have up north already, in Darwin adding probably two thousand uh more uh coming.

Sen. Hagerty (TN)2:01:46 – 2:01:46

Yeah.

David Brat (Witness)2:01:48 – 2:02:08

Uh but pillar two, just to get what you just said about the the economics, uh pillar two is uh Australia uh h has a uh comparative advantage in in quantum computing they take great pride in that. Uh, they do cyber work, uh, and they're big on artificial intelligence, and then on the, on the, on the,

Sen. Hagerty (TN)2:02:07 – 2:02:09

I'd also encourage on pillar two that it,

David Brat (Witness)2:02:08 – 2:02:08

on the, yeah.

Sen. Hagerty (TN)2:02:09 – 2:02:12

it's a great opportunity to bring in other allies like Japan,

David Brat (Witness)2:02:11 – 2:02:11

Yep.

Sen. Hagerty (TN)2:02:12 – 2:02:12

like,

David Brat (Witness)2:02:12 – 2:02:12

Yep.

Sen. Hagerty (TN)2:02:12 – 2:02:17

like South Korea, and I, I would encourage you to do that. We'll be happy to work with you on that regard. I'm gonna come,

David Brat (Witness)2:02:17 – 2:02:17

Yep.

Sen. Hagerty (TN)2:02:17 – 2:02:57

come to you, um, Mister Kovushian, um, uh, to talk about Norway for just a moment. In closing, um, you know, President Trump has emphasized the fact that our European allies need to take greater responsibility for their own defense and contribute more to our collective security. And if you think about how Russia's continuing their aggression in Europe, how China continues to seek to expand its influence in the Arctic region, uh, Norway has emerged as a strong example of the kind of capable and committed NATO ally that the United States needs. Your background with international private sector leadership, your intelligence experience, your personal ties to Norway, I think all of those speak well to, uh, strengthening our relations with an important NATO ally.

David Brat (Witness)2:02:57 – 2:02:57

We're gonna.

Sen. Hagerty (TN)2:02:57 – 2:03:08

like Norway, and I I would just like to hear your thoughts in terms of how you would um, particularly approach Norway in their role partnering with us in in strategic areas like the Arctic and the high north regions.

Kavookjan2:03:10 – 2:03:44

Thank you for that question, uh, Senator. Uh, I I commented on that earlier, uh, as well. Uh, one of the first things I'm gonna do when I get to Norway is, uh, travel personally up to with top-level uh Norwegian officials and uh see firsthand what's going on. I I agree with you that monitoring and countering uh malign Russian and Chinese influence in the Arctic region is a critical concern of the United States and that's gonna be top priority for me.

Sen. Hagerty (TN)2:03:45 – 2:03:49

You know, I it's gonna be an area of contention. Uh it's it's it's evolving as we speak.

Kavookjan2:03:49 – 2:03:50

Well, it should be.

Sen. Hagerty (TN)2:03:49 – 2:03:52

And I very much appreciate your close attention to it, Mister Chairman.

Sen. Risch (ID)2:03:52 – 2:03:52

Oh, yes.

Sen. Hagerty (TN)2:03:52 – 2:03:53

Thank you for your time.

Sen. Risch (ID)2:03:56 – 2:03:59

Thank you, uh, Senator Hagerty. Uh, Senator Shahin.

Sen. Shaheen (NH)2:03:59 – 2:04:35

Yes, I just wanted to to thank, um, Miss Thiel, because I know that my staff asked you about the first global international competition that's gonna be held in South Korea. Um, and you pledged to support that effort if you're confirmed. I really appreciate that. This is an international robotics competition that has about a hundred and eighty countries that participate. from all over and it actually began was begun by uh inventor dean cayman in new hampshire and it does great work so thank you and anything i can do to be helpful with that um i'm certainly uh committed

Sen. Risch (ID)2:04:36 – 2:05:10

uh thank you senator schahin i'll join in that miss steele uh thank you to all uh of you uh we uh appreciate your uh uh participation your family's participation i think the comments that have been made here uh this is an outstanding panel we're looking at we don't we don't always see this kind of quality all in one place and uh we've sure got it this time and uh and we appreciate that. For the information of the committee the record remain open it'll close a business tomorrow May twenty first including for members to submit questions for the record, uh we thank the committee uh uh this hearing is now adjourned. Thank you.

Morning digest

Start every morning briefed on yesterday’s hearings

A free weekday email covering yesterday’s hearings and transcripts newly unlocked in the archive.

Free weekday email. Unsubscribe anytime.